Stepping Into the Time Machine: Cowboys vs. Texans Preview
We're going back to 1960 this Sunday, a time when Dallas had an NFL and an AFL franchise. The Cowboys will don their blue and white inaugural year unis and the Chiefs will remind folks that they were the original professional football Texans, as they wear the same uniforms and helmets that Len Dawson, E.J. Holub and Abner Haynes wore. No word on whether Todd Haley will sport a Hank Stram-esque fedora.
The Chiefs look like an expansion team, starting 0-4 under new coach Haley. To hear many Cowboys partisans, they're also playing like their '60 relatives, losing two games in the final moments. I'm expecting a game with a lot of energy, though the execution could evoke memories of the preseason -- if the Chiefs have anything to say about it.
When the Chiefs Have the Ball
Haley was hired to replace the slow-ball coaching, nap-inducing Herman Edwards, whose game plans featured 28 weekly carries by Larry Johnson, lots of punts and 17-13 Chiefs wins when they worked, which happened less and less as his tenure progressed.
Haley coordinated Arizona's pass first attack last season, and I do mean pass first. His Cardinals had a 66 to 34 percent pass-to-run ratio. His Chiefs are not quite as extreme, but Haley isn't putting any governors on his game plans. Haley obtained veteran Matt Cassell in an offseason trade and he's attacking down the field. Kansas City spreads the field just like the Cardinals did under Kurt Warner last year.
The main difference is that Haley lacks the overall talent he coached at Arizona. He has Dwayne Bowe at one wide receiver spot and he has Larry Johnson in his backfield, but K.C.'s other skill position players are place holders. Haley has recruited a lot of former players from his prior NFL stops. Bobby Wade, who played for Haley at Chicago, plays WR opposite Bowe. Terence Copper, whom Haley coached at Dallas, backs up. Sean Ryan, another former Cowboy from the Parcells days, starts at tight end.
I think you get the picture. The Chiefs are gutty and they're aggressive, but they're not a crisp team. The receivers run bad routes. They drop passes. The offensive line has two young, inexperienced tackles,and Haley gives them little assistance, because he's not going to call a conservative game.
This should suit a Cowboys defense which has found its pass rush after two empty weeks to start the season. Dallas has six sacks the last two weeks and had a seventh nullified by a facemask penalty. The Cowboys broke down a very good Denver line several times last week and should get after Cassell, who is not the most mobile quarterback in the world. The most encouraging sign from Denver was the pressure generated by the left side, where Marcus Spears, Anthony Spencer and Stephen Bowen played some very effective games from three and four man fronts. They're matching up against Mike Goff and Ryan O'Callahan this week and we might see Spencer finally get on the stat sheet. It was his penalty which denied him and Demarcus Ware their first bagged QB last Sunday.
Johnson still has some zip in his legs, but he's a changeup in Haley's attack. The Cowboys have been good at stopping running attacks the last three weeks and Haley would go against tendency if he hammered Johnson at the Cowboys the way Edwards used to. This matchup will come down to K.C.'s protection versus Dallas' rush, and Dallas appears on track to win this. New York caused a lot of problems with their blitz packages last week, though I don't think Wade Phillips will dial up that many this week.
He's been relying on four man rushes a lot more this year and Wade has a compelling reason to lean on them more this week. Starting SS Gerald Sensabaugh will likely miss the game after surgery to repair a broken thumb. The Cowboys played Pat Watkins at the strong, and he'll likely return there this week, unless Wade decides to slide Ken Hamlin to the strong and play Alan Ball in the deep middle.
If Watkins does start, watch his matchup with Ryan. The former Cowboy racked up a lot of second half yards against the Giants last week. Denver didn't pick on Watkins much in their second half, but did make some yards splitting TE Tony Sheffler wide and matching up on Watkins in space. Haley doesn't have many favorable matchups and might make this a focal point of his plan. I think you'll see more zone to keep Watkins out of trouble.
In these cases, watch Demarcus Ware against Chiefs LT Brandon Albert. Albert was a very high pick in '08 but has struggled a bit to get his bearings on the edge. Ware hasn't posted a sack yet and could take advantage of Haley's go for it nature.
The Cowboys have to be prepared for anything. Haley told his team in week one that they'll have to win ugly games if they hope to win at all. They onside kick at any time. They opened the second half last week with one, despite being more than two touchdowns behind. They blitz crazy. They throw deep. They play hard, which the Arrowhead Stadium fans love. They'll aim to make this game sloppy, because sloppy is where they can compete. It will be up to Dallas to keep their collective composure and stick with their game plan.
The risks of a breakdown appear greater on the offensive side. This is a game the Cowboys can win with their defense. If they can keep Bowe under control and seal the edges when Johnson runs wide, the Chiefs will have trouble scoring. They don't protect Cassell well.
But I'll say it again. Be prepared for any gimmick, gadget or risk at any time. Haley has a lot of Parcells in him, and at this point in his head coaching career he has nothing to lose.
Tomorrow: the Cowboys offense versus the Chiefs defense.
0 recs |
40 comments
|
Comments
This has GOT to be the week that Ware gets his first sack
I’m predicting that he gets more than one.
Cowboys 28
Chiefs 10
by BishopWest on Oct 9, 2009 12:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When it came to a choice between the 1960's Cowboys and the Texans,
most Dallas fans followed the Texans. Especially after they beat Houston in that 1962 AFL title game.
Wharter
by Wharter on Oct 9, 2009 4:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Aye. Was just a little Angus then going to games with my Dad.
But never went to a Cowboys game until the Texans left. Then we transferred our loyalty.
I second the motion that D Ware get untracked in the sack department this week.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 9, 2009 6:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Spikes the Texans fullback was my hero.
The good thing about the Cowboys back then was you could see the real NFL play when they came to town, Packers, Browns, Giants ect. Tex once said thats why the Cowboys starting wearing the white jerseys at home, so the fans could see the other teams in there more familiar dark jerseys. Take notes there will be a quiz.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 9, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I remember his crew cut picture from my trading cards. A tough 'un.
Sherrill Hedrick was an LB that bowled and drank some beers with my dad at the old Superior Lanes on Central Exprwy, so I was partial to the defense. Saw Bobby Bly get four picks in the Cotton Bowl one afternoon, I believe against the Raiders, but I’m not certain of that.
Texans were tough in that league.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 9, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't the Oiler and Texan playoff over time game played on Christmas Eve
of 1962. I also liked the Oilers back then because of Don Floyd my sister went to high school in Midlothian with him. He played at TCU with Lilly on a very good team,they both were All American and pro bowlers.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 9, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now that is a detail of which I have no memory.
Other than a vague recollection that there was one, for the championship wasn’t it? It could have been Christmas Eve. I was probably distracted by the festivities.
That must have been a good TCU team, though.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 9, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Goldie oldie Dutch Meyer was the TCU head coach.
He was there for years. They had alot of good teams back in the ’50s in the good ole SWC.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 9, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That game was played on New Year's Eve in Houston.
A bunch of my fraternity brothers…1/2 Oiler fans/1/2 Texans…watched that game on TV.
Either 2 or 3 overtimes. Abner Haynes called the coin toss on the last OT, and mistakenly chose to receive. The texans won anyway.
Great memoies.
Wharter
by Wharter on Oct 9, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK thanks, I was 12 and thats why I watched it by myself.
My parents and older brothers and sisters were partying. I remember screaming at the TV by myself.
by DIRE WOLF on Oct 9, 2009 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 9, 2009 4:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I foresee a lot of problems in the Dallas secondary this week
Matt Cassel isn’t Eli Manning, but the Dallas DBs don’t inspire much confidence in me right now.
by Urinal Mint on Oct 9, 2009 8:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fortunately, Larry Johnson isn't Steven Jackson.
Who was a beast in last year’s embarrassing loss to the Rams. I would be more scared if I thought Larry Johnson was capable of returning to his vintage form. He seemingly isn’t. Cassel seems perfectly content in the role of “Checkdown Charlie” just going by his numbers. As long as the Cowboys run the ball and don’t dick around and only come away with three or four field goals in their red zone trips, they should win in a reasonably decisive fashion. On the other hand, if Garrett calls 50 passes because he decides this is the perfect opportunity for Romo to get his confidence back going into the bye week; look out.
by MadMick on Oct 9, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Analysis MadMick....
You took the words right out of my mouth. I’ll add one thing though- Garrett and his reluctance to make Romo “Checkdown Charlie” is not helping Garrett look very good right now. I have been one of Garrett’s biggest supporters until last years Pittsburgh game. Right now, I have to say that the only thing that will save Garrett is probably Shanahan/Holmgren coming in and showing all these coaches how to call a game. Garrett himself needs coaching, so we don’t know what Garrett is still able to learn or needs to learn. I don’t believe anyone questions Garrett’s playcalling (Wade’s Job), and there needs to be that kind of scrutiny. He was given the genious label without earning it. It was based on potential, just like the Cowboys potential of winning the Super Bowl. But it’s alot of hot air, and no substance to back-up these claims.
If Garrett made Romo more of a “checkdown charlie” as you put it MadMick, then he wouldn’t have to totally pull back on the reigns and make us a total running team. Garrett needs to make better decisions of when to pick and choose his deep shots down the field, and not just treat the downfield pass like it’s his “go-to” play, because every defense can see it. Our playcalling has to disguise what we are doing better than it has. No one is fooled when there is no RB back there with Romo.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 9, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Garrett is not attempting to "fool" anyone when there is no RB in the backfield with Romo
He is hoping that with 5 guys in passing routes that Romo can find at least one of them open, preferably someone with a miss-match.
Some times Romo and the receivers come through and some times they don’t.
The Cowboys are not the only team in the NFL to occasionally run a play with an empty backfield. It has been in NFL playbooks for years.
by BishopWest on Oct 9, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember during the '07 offensive explosion...
even though we had big plays that year, Romo threw numerous checkdowns to the RBs when things weren’t open downfield. And they worked since the LBs and secondary had to account for the WRs and Witten. Aikman did it a lot too.
by selke99 on Oct 10, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry Bish...
But that formation needs to be thrown out by Garrett. It’s not the issue of teams use it that should be debated. the real debate is should WE use that formation? No.
We don’t have the personnel to gain the respect we need from defenses for that formation. Miles Austin still has alot to prove, and he scares no one. DB’s are fast too you know. Since we had to rid ourselves of “Diva Omnipotence” (my new knickname for T.O.), and since he has faultered with the deep ball last year and probably would have this year too, what is it that kept Garrett from going after the type of speed reciever we need in the draft? Free agency? Someone to take some heat off of RW2? Ahh, you have no answer my friend Bishop? i’d like to hear what you have to say to that! We are seriously lacking in speed at the WR position. That is why I’ve been saying to put Ogletree out there. Heck, i even want Manuel Johnson out there if Garrett keeps this pass happiness going. Pretty soon, he’s not going to be so pass “happy”, and then he might look at the running back’s and figure “okay, maybe I’ll run the ball”.
I was steaming mad, brewing, when I watched the Giants draft Hakeem Knicks. We needed a reciever like that. We at least needed to start restocking our OL, and that is why we needed to move up and get Unger. No recievers in the draft because of the departure of “Diva omnipotence”, No OL again. How many bad coaching decisions do you need me to bring up about the offense? Is Garrett not in charge of this? Please don’t tell me that Garrett has no influence in the draft. If you say that, then I’ll respond with “he also should have no influence in what the offensive playcall should be”.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Oct 10, 2009 9:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DAL is not a "pass happy" team
Percentage of Pass Plays Called
First 4 Games of 2008 – 58.1%
All Games of 2008 – 57.7%
First 4 Games of 2009 – 54.4%
The passing is getting less and less
Percentage of Run Plays Called
First 4 Games of 2008 – 41.9%
All Games of 2008 – 42.3%
First 4 Games of 2009 – 45.6%
And the run plays are getting more and more
Your rational that our “go to” plays are passes “holds no water”
DAL has “go to” plays that are runs and passes.
by BishopWest on Oct 10, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see it....
We strugle and let a bad team hang on and then at the end either "heroics"to beat the KC Chiefs or another huge dissapointment. I have lost a lot of respect (if not all) for this team basically because what I was expecting this season is just not there:
1. Wade Philips as Deffensive Coordinator: Our secondary still sucks. Terence Newman is still considered number 1 even though he always breaks up when needed, no pass rush at all, no real replacement for Ellis, no nothing. This unit played good against Carolina and that’s it, they let Byron Leftwich pass for over 300 yards and Eli with a group of rookie receivers looked like Peyton, Wayne and Harrison out there. Good game vs Denver to also give it up at the end. They stink…..there;s nothing new about them.
2. Our WR corps: One good game vs the bucs and then they dissapear….NONE of these players can get open!!! NONE of them. And Romo is taking the heat from them. Yes, I miss Terrell Owens…..at least to draw double coverage because none of these bums need to be covered with 2 players. Miles Austin is just as guilty as the Deffense and Romo for the Denver game. Not knowing the route after a timeout s just unexusable.
3. Jason Garret as Offensive Coordinator: This arrogant prick is the biggest dumba$$ I have ever seen. the paly calling vs the Giants and throwing about 80% of the passes toward Bailey on the denver game is just plain stupid. What hurts the most is that he is the highest paid coordinator out there. This is the biggest rip off ever.
4. Romo: His confidence is gone. he made a mistake pushing TO outta town and now no one is open…..ooops. I like the guy and I think he has terrific skills…his head is what Im affraid of at this point.
This is a stupid team and I can’t help but to think that that is why we don’t have Parcells here anymore. The tuna was smart enough to realize that he was never gonna win with this bunch.
Tons of potential, pleanty of stupidity….the saddest part of it all: no guts! no fire.
by ManTab on Oct 9, 2009 9:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe I'm defending the stinking Giants.
But their receiving corps are for real and so far this season Eli is playing like a franchise QB. Otherwise, I do agree the secondary (which was supposed to be a strength of this team) has looked like a bunch of boners. Of course, a total lack of pass rush in the first two weeks and Ware still being M.I.A. through four games hasn’t helped matters. Maybe somebody will re-animate Ware because Spencer certainly isn’t going to get it done.
As for the receivers, I guess we were all being blissfully ignorant about their opening day performance. Let’s face it, Sabby Piscatelli made Roy Willy look like Ronnie Lott with his ineptitude in that game. If Austin continues to be a non-entity, I’ll be open to sewing my eyelids shut before I have to read about how much “potential” he still has come next offseason.
As for T.O., if he was still here; he wouldn’t be getting open either and if you’ve paid any attention, the few deep balls Losman has found him on he’s managed to drop so far.
by MadMick on Oct 9, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trent Edwards?
Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.
by sublimezg on Oct 9, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah yes, him.
By the way, how atrocious was the UFL opener? Anybody catch it?
by MadMick on Oct 9, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol no, what network do the games air on?
MTV?
Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.
by sublimezg on Oct 9, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards is no Romo by any means, it doesnt even come close
so in defense of TO there is nobody to throw to him, he is in football Siberia
by dcfanz on Oct 9, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean Trent Edwards ....
unless T.O. is in the UFL
Just saying …..
"even though I was born in Toronto Canada and I love the BlueJays and the Raptors and the Leafs .. I cut my finger this morning and I was BLEEDING CHIEFS RED BABY!!!"
by T-DotChiefFanSince93 on Oct 9, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice photo for your avatar.
Made me slosh my coffee this morning.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Oct 10, 2009 6:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
by far and away
the best avatar on this blog
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Oct 10, 2009 7:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I second that about the Giants
STeve Smith (NY) is probably better than Steve Smith (Car) at this point, Manningham is playing well, and that rookie whose name escapes me looks like a gamer. Imagine if the Cowboys actually used some draft picks on receivers, other than trading the front end of this past year for Roy Williams, the classic underachiever.
The Jets gave up a 3rd, a 5th, and a few scrubs to get Braylon Edwards. The Cowboys gave up a 1st and a 2nd to get Roy Williams from Detroit. They are statistically identical, one big season, and others well below that standard. Our Super Genius GM Jerry Jones got rolled by the Freaking Detroit Lions, the most inept franchise in the NFL. Does this not drive anyone else insane?
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 9, 2009 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
or was it a 1st and a 3rd? Either way, JJ got rolled
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Oct 9, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In some cases,
the WRs and TEs are open and Romo isn’t seeing them in time.
Also, Jason Garrett may be a lot of things you don’t like, but arrogant isn’t one of them.
by BishopWest on Oct 9, 2009 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If
the Cowboys lose …. could you imagine the posts we’d get there? Oh man.
by what_the_crap on Oct 9, 2009 10:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I cringe at the thought
Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.
by sublimezg on Oct 9, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you don't have to imagine
just think back to Rams week last year.
by Rafael Vela on Oct 9, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
but I think it’ll be different this time … last time, there was no Romo. This time, there is. People would want Tony’s head ….
by what_the_crap on Oct 9, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW i have the same feeling in my belly....
that i had before last year’s Rams game
by McLovin9 on Oct 9, 2009 10:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Separated at Birth...
Tony Romo meet Matt Holliday
by Montecito Tex on Oct 9, 2009 11:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
sloppy play
well…we certainly know how to play sloppy
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
by angie'sdad on Oct 9, 2009 5:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















