Packers Preview: Packers Offer Fuzzy Target to Cowboys
Who are these guys?
The Green Bay fans are still trying to figure it out. Cowboys fans hope the Packers continue their identity crisis at least until next Monday. The Packers enter their matchup with Dallas at 4-4. A shaky, flawed 4-4 and yet, a dangerous, explosive 4-4. The Cowboys can avoid the blowup, but they must proceed with caution.
When Green Bay Has the Ball
When the Packers were 13-3 in '07, they liked to play, high-wire, spread formation football. They played a lot of three and four wideout sets, with RB Ryan Grant in the backfield with Brett Favre. They stretched secondaries with Donald Driver, Greg Jennings, Donald Lee and James Jones. They could go without a tight end or fullback much of the time because their line protected Favre well.
Two years on, the Packers are still playing down the field, but their protection has crumbled. Aaron Rodgers has already been sacked 35 times this year, leading one national pundit to dub the Packers line, the "baby swiss." They're been especially weak against the better defenses on their schedule. Mike Zimmer's Bengals bagged Rodgers six times. The Vikings sacked him eight times in their first meeting and six more times in the rematch. The lowly Bucs got him six times in their upset this past week. That's 26 sacks in four losses, numbers that probably had Wade Philips ready to call the blitzes first thing Tuesday morning.
To be fair, the Packers have suffered many injuries here. Their regular tackes, Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher, were not ready for the season opener. Tauscher had been released after tearing an ACL late last year but was hastily re-signed when the injuries piled up. Swingman Jason Spitz went on IR a few weeks ago.
Clifton and Tauscher both started last week but offered no clear improvement in protection. Of equal concern was the poor protection by the interior line. I saw one Bucs tackle walk RG Daryn Colledge right back to Rodgers to record a sack. The line looks even shakier this week, on the news that Tauscher is again injured. Rookie T.J. Lang will take his place at right tackle and will no doubt see lots of Demarcus Ware and lots of games by Anthony Spencer and Jay Ratliff when Dallas goes to a four-man line in the nickel.
Spencer has become very good at working the front half of a stunt and last week he crashed down on Eagles RT Winston Justice, knocking him off of Ratliff, who promptly looped in to sack Donovan McNabb.
Dallas can't go too blitz crazy, because the Packers are a decent running team. Grant is rotating with Ahman Green and the Packers would love to find an early rhythm with their runs. It will take some pressure off Rodgers. I say some -- six sacks per game is bad, any way you look at it.
When Dallas Has the Ball
There are five one-win teams in the NFL right now, and Green Bay has played four of them. They've supplied three of the Packers four wins, the other coming opening day against Chicago. The Packers defense slammed these weaklings, allowing just 35 points against the Bears, Rams, Browns and Lions, a tidy 8.8 points per game.
Then came Tampa. The Bucs hit the Packers for 38, raising the Packers average to a still-respectable 14.6. The problem has come against winners. Green Bay is 0-3 in two contests with the Vikings and one with the Bengals. What's worse, the seemingly stout D has allowed 99 points in those games, a not-so-tidy 33 point average.
Green Bay has struggled with power backs. Cedric Benson hammered them for 141 yards and Stephen Jackson added 117 the next week. The Packers did contain Adrian Peterson in the two Vikings contests, but left themselves open to Minnesota's passing game.
Playing eight man fronts is a dare the Packers rarely make because they don't rush the passer well -- they have just 13 sacks. Tthree players, DE Cullen Jenkins and LBs Aaron Kampman and Clay Matthews, have 9.5 of those 13. Kampman will miss the game, further weakening the Green Bay rush.
DC Dom Capers does not have many savory options. If he blitzes Tony Romo heavily, his coverage becomes vulnerable to short passes. Minnesota made several big plays on short tosses to Chester Taylor and on short crosses to Percy Harvin, who tortured the Packers safeties and nickel corners.
Dallas has the players to call a similar game. Felix Jones would welcome some short tosses in the open field. So would Sam Hurd, who scored a touchdown against Seattle by turning a short cross past Seattle's linebackers into a long romp up the sideline. Patrick Crayton hit the Eagles with a 62 yard seam route just before the half last week when he got behind their linebackers.
On the other hand, if Capers sits back, Jason Garrett will hammer Barber, Jones and Choice at his front seven repeatedly. The Packers do have good starting corners, so I don't expect lots of quick strikes up field. If the Dallas line can protect Romo, we should see a methodical, ball-control game plan.
Special Teams
I've harped on this matchup all week because I feel special teams could win this game. Dallas has been every effective covering kicks and has had exceptional punt return teams. Their one shortcoming has come on kickoff returns, where Joe DeCamillis has been unable to find the right blocking combination for his returner rotation of Felix Jones, Miles Austin and Kevin Ogletree.
If Joe D can settle his two-man wedges, he can demolish the Packers coverage team. They gave up 77 and 48 yard returns to Percy Harvin in the Vikings loss two weeks ago and a critical 82 yard return when they were ready for an early knockout against the Bucs.
The Packers have a big-legged kicker in Mason Crosby, but they really suffer when Crosby can't hit touchbacks. Crosby kicked four to open the Tampa game but left his fifth short and had it returned inside his team's red zone.
The Cowboys must practice bounced kickoffs and short directional kicks, especially if the weather reports call for cold conditions. Crosby began hitting bouncers and popups against the Vikings after Harvin showed his big return skills. The Vikings didn't get great returns on these changeups, but they were fielding the ball at their own 20 and 25 and therefore got field position around their 35 or 40. If the Cowboys up men can field these cleanly (and this IS something they practiced regularly in training camp, so I assume they work on it a lot) the team should get great field position after any Packers kickoff.
Dallas also has the suddenly explosive Patrick Crayton returning punts at a 16 yard average. DeCamillis may eschew returns and go after a punt or two; Tampa got an early score by blocking a Green Bay punt, which Ronde Barber returned for six. The Packers units have been ragged in all areas. Look for maximum Dallas pressure on all special teams downs.
Overall
Despite their protection problems, the Packers can score and probably will score. Nobody has held them under 21 points this year. Aaron Rodgers is a quality quarterback and he has three quality receivers in Driver, Jennings and Jones. The keys for Dallas are the same ones they took to Philadelphia: keep the big play receivers in front of you; deny Rogers the big throw; put heavy pressure on his patchwork line; protect the football when you have it, assuring Green Bay has to make long drives, and exploit the serious advantage on special teams.
If Dallas protects the football, it should win. But as we all know, who can predict turnovers? Green Bay's defense has at least one takeaway in every game this season and 18 total this year. Dallas can't lose its concentration, or it can lose the game.
0 recs |
74 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
O-Tree
“Dallas has the players to call a similar game. Felix Jones would welcome some short tosses in the short field. So would Sam Hurd, who scored a touchdown against Seattle by turning a short cross into a long romp up the sideline. Patrick Crayton hit the Eagles with a 62 yard seam route just before the half last week when he got behind their linebackers. "
Where’s the love for Ogletree? A few screen passes to him are definitely called for in this game. Let my man from Virginia spin some heads. Wahoowa!
by BillyBates on Nov 12, 2009 12:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Those flanker screens only work
against heavy pressure.
I’d like to see Ogletree in the slot but I don’t know if he’s ready for that yet.
When he is, you have three big WRs with two, in Austin and him, who can burn it.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 12, 2009 12:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
How big is Ogletree, exactly?
He didn’t look that big, but that’s compared to guys like Austin and Roy, I suppose.
Epic Fail since 1985
by the red scare on Nov 12, 2009 12:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He's 6'1" if I remember correctly
by Rafael Vela on Nov 12, 2009 12:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And 196 lbs
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 5:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what he was listed at coming out
So, lets run it through the translator… hmmm, add six, carry the five… right at 5’6" and 165.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 5:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So Is Maurice Jones-Drew
4’11" and 125?
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Nov 12, 2009 7:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sproles?
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Nov 12, 2009 7:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He is referred to pocket darren over at KSK

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Nov 12, 2009 7:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's awesome!
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 12, 2009 8:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Dunk
You must work for the government with math like that.
by oldboysfan on Nov 12, 2009 6:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh...I always pictured Ogletree
as being a sort of Kevin Williams/Kelvin Martin type receiver, i.e., 5’9" and 175.
by DavidH22 on Nov 12, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The other Cowboys WRs are big, so Ogletree looks small next to them.
Roy is what, 6’4", or 6’3" and Austin had to slim down to get to 214. He used to play over 220. He’s got a thick lower body. A 195 guy looks skinny next to those two, and to Martellus Bennett, who makes some of the linemen look puny.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 12, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This should be a good one
For Cowboys fans, anyways.
Austin always seems to torch the Packers, 3 years in a row(the two PI calls a few years ago pretty much won the game for us, if I remember correctly). Romo’s on fire right now, the D is clicking, and our special teams look legit.
Rodgers does scare me. That offense can score on us, but I like the way our offense matches up with their defense. I also like the way our D is playing right now. This one could get ugly for the Packers if our D can shut Rodgers and company down. They just got done shutting the Eagles big play offense down, so it’s definitely possible.
I certainly don’t see this one being a low scoring affair. It just remains to be seen whether or not the Packers can keep up with the Cowboys. If our D continues to play the way it has been, I don’t think Green Bay can.
Epic Fail since 1985
by the red scare on Nov 12, 2009 12:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I am most excited about our DBs
I have confidence that those guys will be in on every play. Sure, there will be times when the perfect pass will be completed, and they may get burned now and then. But unlike past years, I believe in Jenkins, T-New and Sensebaugh to run a tight ship out there. If our offense doesn’t screw this game up (i.e. 3-4 turnovers) I feel good about the game.
"Right after the game, say as little as possible."
- Tom Landry
by BillyBates on Nov 12, 2009 12:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The secondary has been playing great
Scandrick’s no slouch, either. A few passes completed on him have been really lucky. He’s almost always on his guy like white on rice. Ball’s been playing pretty good, too.
But yeah, T-New, Jenkins, Sensei, and Hamlin are the guys that deserve the most credit. It’s just awesome that our role players aren’t far behind those guys.
Epic Fail since 1985
by the red scare on Nov 12, 2009 12:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I wasn’t trying to diss Scandrick. That completion up the middle to the Eagles receiver was covered perfectly. Scandrick just turned around too late and it was a perfect pass.
"Right after the game, say as little as possible."
- Tom Landry
by BillyBates on Nov 12, 2009 5:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At least he turns around!
Unlike NEWMAN
by blee on Nov 12, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Secon-dary....ummm!
T.Newman still scares me when he puts himself on the best WR on the other team, because he sucks at covering and he has er’body fooled about his skills. He always gets burnt and just lately he has started to tackle because all the rest of DB have up their game….. just like Roy W.(horsecollar) his game is going to show up because he is masking his play right now……ask me if I’m a fan of his….well, what do you think??
RL Dixon Jr
by cboyfolife on Nov 12, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Always?
I don’t think that’s real accurate.
This is not Newmans best year, in fact I would say that he’s struggled some but to say that he just sucks a covering is an inaccurate statement.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Nov 12, 2009 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you have zero cred
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 12, 2009 11:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What happened to those Buehler TBs. I don't remember one last week. Is the air heavy in Philly.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
by CowboyMan on Nov 12, 2009 12:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the same thing during that game
Maybe there was some wind or something.
"Right after the game, say as little as possible."
- Tom Landry
by BillyBates on Nov 12, 2009 12:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He was asked to kick directionally to keep it away from D. Jackson
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 12, 2009 7:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
DeSean Jackson is big time
and Philly has good special teams.
I think they couldn’t count on Buehler kicking them out of the end zone and kicked to pin him into a corner rather than kicking deep down the middle and risking him bringing it out from three or four yards deep.
The Eagles had one return past the 30 so I think it worked. They’re a big play team, on offense, defense and special teams and Dallas frustrated them in all areas.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 12, 2009 12:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Makes sense, Thanks Raf.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
by CowboyMan on Nov 12, 2009 1:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fuzzy is right
Good description. I usually start to get a feel for the upcoming game by now and I don’t have one for this game. I’m a little uncomfortable with this one for some reason. Hope the Boys don’t take this one lightly..
by Benthere on Nov 12, 2009 1:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Warm & Fuzzy
You should feel real good. We own the Pack.
Like eating a peach
He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson
by Fighter15 on Nov 12, 2009 7:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have a bad feeling about this game. . .
and have for weeks. Even moreso now, with GB desperate, their defense relatively solid, them playing at home, and us coming off a huge win and four-game win streak.
I can’t get “20-25 points each, last minute win by GB” out of my head.
I hope I’m wrong, of course. Totally and completely.
by dfan77 on Nov 12, 2009 3:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
let's hope
Dallas has the same worry and puts in the work to make sure it doesn’t happen.
This is a game the Cowboys should win..but it is an effort game where a solid preformance gets a W and a half-hearted effort gets an L.
These are big games too because they show the maturity to beat a capable but ultimately lesser opponent
by SDTrueblue on Nov 12, 2009 5:20 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
You can't be too worried about it or you will end up making mistakes, by trying not to make mistakes.
Take each play as it comes and win your individual battle. Play hard and clean and let the chips fall where they may. Just remember they pay the guy on the other side of the line too.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
by GunsUp on Nov 12, 2009 6:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
where is there defense relatively solid?
they play a competent offense and they are putrid
Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.
by KDP on Nov 12, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Philthy not solid?
Atlanta? Oh, you mean their defense!
No, GB does not have a great D, but they are pretty solid. Great corners, great LBs. They do give up chunks on the ground and don’t get tremendous pressure, but they’re not bad by any means. Don Capers is a great DC.
With Kampmann expected to be out, they’ll have an even tougher time getting pressure on Romo. With time in the pocket, Romo & the RHG will have a field day.
He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson
by Fighter15 on Nov 12, 2009 7:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cant really see us losing this game.
In fact I would bank on 9-2 after beating GB, Oakland and Washington.
The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!
by aussie_cowboy on Nov 12, 2009 4:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
cheers!!
Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.
by KDP on Nov 12, 2009 6:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I like you enthusiasm aussie.
However, you can throw out the records when the Cowboys and Redskins play, something weird always seems to happen in these games. Remember the two Moss long touchdown catches a few years back?
by thepainster on Nov 12, 2009 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
and Washington made the playoffs that year.
I know that it’s a “rivalry game” but Washington is bad in every area of the field.
The only bright spot has been Brian Orakpo for them. The young receivers still suck, Chris Cooley is out, and their O-line is aweful.
There is no way in hell I see them beating Dallas in Dallas.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Nov 12, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting Sequence
Last year in the second week, we beat the Eagles in prime time, then went on the road to beat the Packers for the first time ever in Lambeau. After that we returned home and lost to the Redskins, came close to losing at home to a weak Bengals team, then went completely south in Arizona and were never truly able to recover.
We have a similar three game sequence of games again this year: Eagles on prime time, Packers on the road, Redskins at home, followed by a struggling AFC (Oakland) team at home. Then we travel to the Giants, and begin the month of December.
Let’s hope things turn out better this time. The early returns are encouraging. Ever since Kansas City, this team has played with much greater focus.
by kindablue on Nov 12, 2009 7:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good observation
the biggest difference – at least to this point – is the lack of significant injuries. The loss of Kosier eventually led to the loss of Romo. And of course, no Felix, limited Barber and on and on. If they can stay healhty, especially on the offensive line, I think their new-found focus will propel them beyond last year’s performance.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 7:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Injuries Hurt
No doubt. But I think the coaching has taken a large step forward this season, on offense, defense and special teams. Garrett was driving me nuts last year with his one-note play calling, but I’m pleased with what he’s done this year. He kept the Eagles off-balance with the Razorback and screens, and the Miles TD was a trap set up by running slants earlier in the game. Kudos all around.
by kindablue on Nov 12, 2009 7:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
they improved themselves on many fronts. I do wonder if the “TO Effect” was real. I didn’t really buy it before, but it sure does seem like they have a much more diversified offense – Romo is throwing to seven or more receivers every game and still they are putting up the numbers and scores.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 8:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The one TO effect that has been proven wrong is the offensive production has not dropped off from last year.
I am not sure but it could be the same amount of production as 2007 or at least it is on that pace.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Nov 12, 2009 8:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But, in all fairness, Romo didn't have time to throw with our broken o-line, if you're comparing to last year.
by GalTex on Nov 12, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no I agree
The TO Effect I refer to is that they can spread the ball around without it fracturing the locker room.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 7:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
amen brother
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 12, 2009 11:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the ST should be the main focus for dallas in regards to exploiting
mainly because the off and def are in such a state they will get the most attention, I hope dallas is eyeing for a big ST play.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Nov 12, 2009 7:49 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Philly was certainly a big test, but I think GB is, too.
How will the Cowboys handle a desperate team that they really should beat?
I think GB could give us some trouble, but we’ve shown improvement for weeks, now, and if the Cowboys focus on this game the way they have on the past few, we’ll come away with a W.
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
by 24Hz on Nov 12, 2009 8:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This will be a test
They are a solid team and will be fighting for their playoff lives.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 8:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The test is how the cowboys handle success, they have shown they can handle adversity but this game will show
if they can handle success. I think it was Brad Sham who said that yesterday on Talking Cowboys.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Nov 12, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Raf...
When do you think Wade is going to unleash the 46? Do you think we will see it this weekend against that suspect O-line?
by TheCowboyFan on Nov 12, 2009 9:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It pops up here and there for a play
but he hasn’t made it a basis for a game plan as it was for Washington II.
Teams with bad centers might bring it out. Remember, he did it to protect his MLB. The Giants and Stephen Jackson ripped them good. He was putting Burnett at MLB and needed to stack him.
Brooking has made the 46 an afterthought.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 12, 2009 9:47 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
raf
i really appreciate all you do for this blog, i also appreciate how available you are to answer questions and share your knowledge.
thanks pal for all the attention you give this blog.
by Musiccitynorm on Nov 12, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this is why we should be very careful about this game
by texstar on Nov 12, 2009 11:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
yea,
This is going to be a war! i hope the boys are aware of what they are walking into and get up for the task at hand. The Packers are playing for their ego lives.
by Musiccitynorm on Nov 12, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no doubt they will come to play
and my guess is so will the Boys. Should be a great game.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
by dunkman on Nov 12, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
It’s clear where they are coming from. Thanks Tex.
by oldboysfan on Nov 12, 2009 7:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Put it up on the bulletin board
right along with the mouse-traps. Great post.
by Silverblue on Nov 12, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't think it will make a difference for them...
All this touchy-feeling stuff doesn’t make their structural faults any better. You have to imagine that they felt as motivated, if not more, to beat the Vikings with BF as they do the Cowboys now. And, look what happened to them.
The second game at Lambeau Field wasn’t even competitive. They had to have known that if they could control AP the key to winning that game was to get pressure on Farve and knock him down. But, they hardly laid a hand on him as he went on to scorch them with some big plays.
So, what’s going to change this week? Is all this feel good talk going to make it possible for their corners to start playing better zone. They’ve got more than one player in a key position on that 3-4 defense with backside cover 2 who has no idea how things are supposed to work. We create confusion between the first and second level and we win.
by LDVFootball on Nov 12, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That was a good read
On what to expect from these guys. I trust that our Boys won’t take them lightly in the least.
by Joon on Nov 12, 2009 7:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
THAT is EXACTLY
What I am talking about. I know a lot of Homers here put way too much emphasis on pure stats. Here’s a news flash: it isn’t solely about stats, and never has been, ever, for any team. Never will be. LDV, you must be an engineer. :) And if not, you certainly think like one.
It’s true that “intangibles” are exactly that — they’re a lot more difficult to measure, if not impossible. You can stick them in rows and columns and add them up.
But do you think stats predicted a Raiders win over the Eagles? A Jets win over the Colts in SBIII? Arizona’s late run to last year’s SB?
No. No. No.
Will statistics USUALLY win? Sure enough. But to ignore the intangibles, the desire, the dynamics. . .well, you do so at your peril.
Any smart player or coach knows that.
The rest is all just Homerism.
by dfan77 on Nov 13, 2009 12:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is truly UNAMERICAN....
When you cant go on an American-based blog site of another team and criticize their whole stinking team(or lack thereof) for more than 36 minutes of one frigging day. I mean seriously, whats the sense of having a blog site, if you cant criticize with an open mind such as I obviously have, another teams lack of a QB with stellar numbers(in this instance I compared Sheli to Romo, and asked them if they really think he is worth the $97 million they paid him?) Now is that such a crime considering he has done nothing lately but LOSE to a pathetic bunch of second tier football teams, and that it even compounded matters when the Loses were in your own back yards…
Honestly though is that really a reason to bann a guy from your blog site permanently…
Geez, just because you tell them that their SuperBowl win has all the makings of a fluke,
and that their D-Line has a lot of re-pairing to do, over their bye-week, is that really a reason to deprive a guy the right to honestly express his opinion?…Didnt the Russian KGB send you a warning first to tell you to shut your trap, before they shot you in cold blood?…Have we sunk so far down, that people cant even ridicule, all in the sense of team Spirit, another teams pathetic doldrums?
Now I could understand if I constantly went in their and ridicued their team the way I did, and after several attempts to stifle the flow of anti-Gnat sentiments that I wrote didnt work, that first they would be nice enough to give me fair warning to cease and desisit, but to just write(quote)“I dont care who you root for that kind of behaviour will not be tolerated in here”(unquote)…What did I do?…Did I act like a troll and run away?…Nope!!!…
Did I do this out of an act of revenge, or in a hostile manner???…again I say Nyet!!!…I merely had it in my mind to go there and deliver to them a first i thought a contrary opinion, but when I arrived there, it was already doom, and gloom…Now me being the HOMER that I am for the Cowboys, surely they did not think for one moment that I was going to try and alleve any of their agnozing, by saying a kind word, or giving them any hopeful insights…NO SIRREE…I merely did what any other sincere and passionate fan of any other team who HATES the Gnats, I handed them a verbal knife to cut their throats, and end their downtrodden spirits…Again, I ask you what behaviour did I display that any other fan would not have done likewise?
I mean I dont wanna take this case to the United Nations, nor even have a Harvard Review Board study it, but I just wanted to truly vent some of the frustration i feel as a fan of another team, who is forbidden to have his opinion delivered to a crowd who really, really needs it…I mean if you just think about it for a second, what have the Gnats got to lose(except another game or 3 which would effectively knock them out of the playoffs) by reading the insights that I offer them, free of charge, no less, in open forum…
So I wrote to the owner of the blog site, and we have gotten his reply, that because of the inflammatory words that I wrote(dont exist), and the highly explosive way I wrote(geez, I must be a better writer than I though), that he felt that for the time being it would best serve the interests of his blog site for me to refrain from posting and that I was not wanted in there(damn, talk about hurting a guys feelings)…So, I must allow the humorous, and often vivid language that I used in his blog to go un-written for now…Ill bet if their team had a winning record, and they werent feeling like the proverbial “lower than whale shit”, what I wrote would cause for a heated and blandished discussion…Tell me what you think…should we be held in check by a bunch of milk-n-toast whining in the dark Liberalists such as the Gnat site blog owner?…FEAR THE STAR
by Hawgz, Bugz, and FilthyFowl Hater on Nov 13, 2009 10:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















