The VRR: Surviving Injury Up Next For Cowboys
The Dallas Cowboys' relatively injury-free season was fractured on Sunday. More specifically, it was torn apart. Right tackle and resident tough-guy on the offense, Marc Colombo, fractured his tibia, but it turns out that will heal on its own. It's the torn ligaments in his ankle that require surgery.
Marc Colombo will undergo surgery to repair the torn ligaments in his right ankle and will miss at least six weeks. The fibular fracture will heal on its own. There is a chance Colombo could play again this season if the Cowboys make a playoff run.
We all know how important the continuity along our offensive line has been to the success of the Cowboys offense. Last year, the Cowboys lost that when they lost Kyle Kosier, and in turn started to struggle. Now, they must face life without Colombo for the rest of the regular-season at minimum. This time, they turn to Doug Free. We've been waiting for a while to find out what we have in Free, but obviously we didn't want to find out this way.
Still, we've been watching Flozell Adams over the past couple of years and wondering when age and injury would fully catch up to him, all the while wondering if Free was his eventual replacement. We'll get a preview of that when he takes over for Colombo over the stretch-run, even though it would be at the "theoretically" less-challenging right tackle position. Free has to show he can handle that, before we have any thoughts of him eventually taking over at left tackle. Marc Colombo will be back after this season, the question has always been when will it be over for Flozell?
More VRR after the jump...

Leonard Davis says that he and Free are already talking together and working toward integrating Free into a line that is not short on experience.
"The whole time Doug was out there, him and I were talking," Davis said. "We talked on the bench and just kind of went over some plays and scenarios, so that way when we got on the field we were able to communicate and be on the same page, because the worst thing you can do is go out on the field with somebody that's never had any game experience and not be on the same page."

The good news on the injury front is that Mike Jenkins appears to be fine after bruising his bicep during the game and shouldn't miss any time. The bad news is Ken Hamlin, who we don't know about yet, but conflicting reports give pause.
Safety Ken Hamlin has a high ankle sprain that could keep him out a couple of weeks. Alan Ball or Pat Watkins would replace Hamlin if he cannot play.
Over at DC.com, they were a little more optimistic.
Two other players were forced to come out of the game with injuries, including Ken Hamlin, who suffered a high ankle sprain in the third quarter and did not return after being taken to the locker room for X-rays. The Cowboys don't expect Hamlin to be out long term. "It's real hard to tell early," Jerry Jones said. "But it does not look like an extended period of time he'll be out."
Sounds like he could miss a week or two.

Are players named Roy Williams simply cursed in Dallas? Roy Williams, the receiver, had his best statistical outing for the Cowboys and was one of the few offensive players early-on that made any plays, only to have that all overshadowed by his disastrous fumble and drop. For the drop, he claimed the lights and his visor-glare blinded him - let me give that a simple 'whatever'. But, he at least recognized he helped blow the game.
"The fumble, that’s on me," Williams said. "The one in the lights, that’s on me. If the lights weren’t there that’s a catch. I lost this game for this football team. That’s the way I feel."

Nick Eatman makes the case that the Cowboys abandoned the running game too soon.
Barber gets 20 yards on his first two carries of the game and finishes with just three more . . . the rest of the game? Seriously? That's what I had a problem with. We're not talking about the game getting out of hand or the score was prohibitive for the run. And you can't say the Packers completely sold out to stop the run, or you would think the Cowboys might have attempted more than a handful of deep balls. The Packers' safeties were playing too deep to suggest a lot of eight-man fronts.
Raf looks at it with a different conclusion in this post, but let's talk about what hasn't been said much recently.
Felix Jones doesn't look anything like his old self since coming back from the knee injury. The quick burst, the explosiveness when he finds a small crease are just not there right now. He's still wearing the knee brace and over the past few games has added very little to the Cowboys cause. Should he be sitting until fully healthy? Is there a problem no one is discussing? Or is he just in a mini-slump? Without Jones' big bursts from the backfield, the Cowboys ground game is suffering.

Before we dive into this next story, let's all pledge that we are not in anyway blaming this game on the officials. But...didn't it feel like Dallas got hosed in the replay department on Sunday. By now we all know that the officials couldn't review the fumble that was recovered by Felix Jones. Still, even though it was the rule, that doesn't make us feel any better. That was a huge turning point in the game and essentially ended any chance of the Cowboys coming back once that Packers scored a TD.
"My mistake [thinking it was reviewable]," Triplette told a pool reporter after the game. "That’s not a reviewable aspect of a play. A recovery of a loose ball in the field of play is not reviewable by rule. So we just couldn’t review it."
I bet the NFL will review it, the rule that is, this offseason.
But how about another mistake that basically went unnoticed. On fourth down with just under 8 minutes to go, the Cowboys picked up the first down on a great "catch" by Patrick Crayton. Cowboys ball, first and ten at the Green Bay 29 yard-line. But the Packers challenged the play.
Triplette failed to penalize the Packers in the fourth quarter after coach Mike McCarthy tried to challenge a play when the Packers were out of challenges. Rule 15, Section 9 of the rule book states that "for initiating a challenge when all of a team’s timeouts have been exhausted or when all of its available challenges have been used: Loss of 15 yards."
A 15-yard penalty would have put the Cowboys at the Pack 14 with 8 minutes to go. Sure, a miracle comeback was far-fetched, but at least you'd like to have all the benefits of correct rulings to make it happen.

And to close, I have to give a shout-out to the Packers Charles Woodson. The whole Packers 3-4 defense was good, in fact great, but Woodson was the star.
Charles Woodson made enough for the Packers. He shadowed Witten more than the Cowboys thought he would, but he went further than merely playing his position. He was involved in all three Dallas turnovers.
We needed someone like him on Sunday.
0 recs |
84 comments
|
Comments
I was screaming at the TV after no penalty
was called on GB for the 3th challenge
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
I was as well...
Otherwise coaches would just throw it on the field at any time to get a stoppage and create a competitive advantage. It is absolutely ridiculous the ref missed that call.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 16, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions
That's exactly what I thought McCarthy was doing.
He’d be an idiot to risk a 15 yarder, but it turned out to be a brilliant move, as he didn’t even get the 15 yarder. I frequently find it at least suspicious how the officials can miss calls on the opponent, but flag us for minutia. When I hear someone else say such things I snicker to myself, so I usually bottle this stuff up.
Even at game speed when Felix recovered the fumble to me it was clear he was stripped after controlling the ball. In the final analysis, the Packers wanted it more than the Cowboys. I can’t sit here and cry about dropped balls, and bad calls, when our team lays an egg like that. You’d think at some point someone would do something right just on pure chance alone.
And one more thing. Did we set a record for number of 3rd and long chances?
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
I just saw this on Twitter.
http://lonestarstruck.com/2009/11/dallas-injury-report-buehler-to-have-mri.html
Ugh. Hope it’s not true, or at least, not serious.
He
shouldnt be covering punts, i know he’s a great athlete but really do we need to go back to Folk as kickoff specialist. Why cant Buehler get some looks on pats and eventually Fg’s?
by icouldusesomebaseball on Nov 16, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
because he's a distance kicker, not an accurate kicker
to help you remember, several years ago we had a 2nd kicker on the team, I believe his name was spelled Daluiso, or something like that. He was a KO specialist and the only time he kicked FGs was due to injury or if the attempt was extremely long…in Folk’s case that might have to be 54+ yards long. Unless Folk gets hurt, starts missing kicks regularly or its a long kick, Buehler is a special teams specialist and will cover punts, be on kickoff and punt return and chase down his own kick-offs. All you people clammoring for him to take Folk’s spot don’t know a thing about kicking…if Buehler was accurate and had the strong leg he’d been drafted in the 3rd round, not the 5th.
by Kansas Cowboy on Nov 16, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions
my question on Felix and the knee brace...
Aikman (or monkey-boy) said yesterday that Felix practices all week without the brace but then plays with it on Sunday…
i dont get it…wouldnt it make more sense to practice with the knee brace and then take it off on Sundays?? i understand that he practices without it to build up strength but clearly he doesn’t seem to be running the same with the brace on….
No because you can limit things in practice
You can’t tell the other team not to hit him in the game… plus he strengthens everything by playing without the brace
Cowboys fan since 1978.. I was 3 years old
The officiating was bad.
I don’t think that crew of refs had a clue. When is the NFL going to get full time refs? I never understood why in this day and time they still use part time refs.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
meh...i think it was about average
the Felix Jones thing couldnt be reviewed….
but i dont know how they overturned that fumble on the punt return….seemed to me like his knee went down on his own, came back up and mcbriar punched the ball out….its one thing to let it stand given the video evidence but i dont know how they overturned it
the offensive PI on Witten was legit….the hand to the face on Jenkins was ticky-tack
How about the spot on the overturned fumble punt return.
I thought it was about 10 more yards than it should have been.
Saints Dallas 2006 game
This is what I posted last night -
On the 3rd challenge, I believe GB should have got 15 yards penalty. I remember the Saints-Dallas game from Dec 06. The situation was the final 2 min of the first half and Parcells threw a challenge flag for some reason. If I remember right, the pass was broken up but Saints got 15 yards (& eventually scored) because Parcells should not have thrown the flag. This may not have changed the outcome, but I wonder if the Cowboys coaches missed something here.
i was thinking that too.....
although i was thinking that they would get a 5yd delay of game penalty
I just hope we don't have that particular crew again.
I’ve seen bad for both sides, but jeez they were just bad all the way around.
"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell
OT - Regarding Instant Replay
so i dont know all the replay rules, nor do i know if this question has been posed on btb before. How is it that you can’t review the fumble recovery by Felix when he was touched but they can review when too many men on the field after the play is ran.
by icouldusesomebaseball on Nov 16, 2009 3:09 PM CST reply actions
That's the rule, but it doesn't make sense.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
i dont know but maybe they dont want to make the play reviewable....
because most fumble recoveries include a dogpile where possession may change several times…so maybe they dont want to subject the replay officials to that type of challenge….i dont know – they seem to have enough trouble getting the fumble/down by contact challenges correct…
No, it doesn't make sense.
That would be like saying you can’t review whether the ground caused a fumble, or whether a player was already down before the fumble. They review stuff like that all the time.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Right.
Marc Colombo will undergo surgery to repair the torn ligaments in his right ankle and will miss at least six weeks. The fibular fracture will heal on its own.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Maybe possession of the fumble cannot be reviewed.
But as Troy pointed out, they could certainly have reviewed whether or not Felix was down by contact before he re-fumbled it.
Their excuse is bogus.
The refs didn’t cost us the game, but they certainly contributed their part. If we keep the ball there it’s not 17-0 but 10-0. If we get first down at the 14 after the illegal third challenge, maybe there’s a different outcome.
There, got that off my chest.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Why have review if they don't use it to get the plays right.
It would be fine with me if they dropped replay all togather.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
Good point.
Then we keep the ball after GB fumbles on the punt return.
Of course, we’d have to do something with it, but still . . .
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Bad calls would all even out
and maybe the refs would do a better job without big brother looking over their sholder.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
I just hope that none of the jerks on that officiating crew are allowed
in any of the NFC/AFC playoff games.
In fact, send them to the CFL!
Wharter
Actually we had significant injuries, but for some reason
1. nobody is making a big deal out of it and
2. the team is putting the injured players on the field.
Yes Felix Jones has not been the same ever since his injury and for the life of me I dont know why he is trotted out on the field, he is useless when injured. Let him seat on the bench for a month and than when healthy, fully healthy let him play. The cowboys did the same with MBIII although I think he is close to 100% now. Again playing injured players doesn’t do us any good, the players are ineffective prone to mistakes and prone to further injuring themselves.
well, I don't think you can say that.......
since he can’t seem to stay healthy for two consecutive games. Bad luck-maybe! But you can’t call him a complete back when he hasn’t even been able to stay on the field for consecutive games.
I think he meant Felix is already better at pass blocking than Bush
Bush also doesn’t run inside much (if any), and we’ve seen healthy Felix run everywhere.
Bush is almost more of a WR that lines up in the backfield.
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 16, 2009 11:28 PM CST up reply actions
I can call him a complete back because that's what he is
Jones can run inside and outside and catch the ball. Bush can’t run inside at all, he’s in all reality a WR playing RB.
Jones is nothing like that.
In Romo we Trust
Jones does not stay on the field long enough to be a complete back
Durability is part of the complete package for a back
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
By complete, I was referring to his skill set
but you’re right, to be considered one of the best, he has to stay healthy.
In Romo we Trust
But
I’ve never seen a better looking back in preseason and the first couple of games. He puts Emmit, Barry, and Jim Brown to shame…. Unfortunately, those guys got it done in the regular season.
by JimmyJohnson on Nov 17, 2009 7:22 AM CST up reply actions
But
that is a huge BUT.
As of right now, he is Mr. Potential
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Mike Hamlin is no where near better than Watkins right now....
Watkins will be the starter
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Dom Capers schooled JG.
The old man new what Dallas was going run before Dallas did
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
you are correct.......
I didn’t realize that we only ran 11 rushing plays. Kinda gets lost in the shuffle doesn’t it? Don’t know why we got so pass happy yesterday unless Romo was checking off of Garrett’s calls? Either Romo was checking off passing instead of rushing or Garrett totally screwed up. Why all the pass plays when your QB is getting killed?
GB laid back their ears and rushed Romo
not worring about the run. Not JG best called game.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
so you think it was JG and not Romo checking off?
I may be wrong (very possibly) but I thought that Romo is given both a rushing option and a passing option. Am I dreaming? If so, was this Romo or JG?
I guess some could be that, but not that much I don't think
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
Yep....;..
I just saw on DMN that Marion Barber’s fractured thumb was bothering him during the game which affected his pass blocking. So why wasn’t Choice playing instead? I just think, like you, that JG got totally out-coached. This is sure a head scratcher
The run game, though went
nowhere. We should be honest here. That was the lines’ worst game since last year. They couldn’t run block and they couldn’t pass protect.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I agree
I missed the first drive because the 1st game on FOX went long so I didn’t get to enjoy MB3 having any success. To me the running game looked ineffective, or the GB defense made it look bad, whichever. Romo saved them a few times on pass protection mistakes, but he was taking a beating all game long.
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 16, 2009 11:10 PM CST up reply actions
disagree
He can’t account for Roy’s fumble, Romo’s overthrow, missed blitz assignments, and penalties.
I don’t blame this one the coaches. The players simply didn’t execute the game plan.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Dallas
Is a good, but not elite team, so they will have clunkers occasionally..
This game was a clunker.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
yep
I was thinking that while watching the game
We are potentially a great defense. If the defense keeps improving, we will be in EVERY ballgame.
Offensively…its a struggle.We don’t have much of a run game. Our passing game is on and off, and flat out not very good at times due to a poor ol.
kinda humorous to think...
that everyone wants Wade’s head, but wants to give JG the HC position…
Garret may be a great OC one day. but that’s not this day.
It's not that I'm saying we're due a playoff win, but I didn't have my license to drive when we won our last one...
by bulldog jeeper on Nov 16, 2009 9:24 PM CST up reply actions
But don't miss the forest for the trees
nothing works when the line struggles, and they did in a big way.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
With Colombo most likely out for the season and Free now starting that leaves Proctor as the only backup.
Do we have someone on the practice squad to bring up or will we be signing someone to have 7 o-lineman.
JG can't execute the plays for them can He?
What happened to the training camp Mantra of “doing things exactly right.”
Blown assignments, poor execution, penalties were the cause of a lost
running game and the loss. IMO
Its way too easy to outright blame garret
and too many people do it.
When you aren’t moving the ball AT ALL like we were, and you’re constantly sacked and penalized, you’re not going to run much.
I agree
Mr. Garret’s boys may have been out executed, but he was not out-schemed or anything.
He will have to take the blame for getting them to play better though.
I'm not sure who to blame, Garret or Houck
but our OL got tortured
Red's boys did not execute well.
But IMO Capers got the best of him.
On Felix's non fumble recovery...
we’ve all been duped by the league into complaining at the wrong thing.
Our complain CAN’T be about why the play was not reviewable. Nor why the zebras didn’t know that.
Our complaint has to be about the wrong call on the field. Period. At real speed its obvious Felix recovered the ball. It was a punk play for the Packers to pull it out of his hands after he had it and was down. AND the refs missed that.
there is a saying, "keep playing till you hear the whistle"
anyway I know that when you play on the road, the home team gets the close calls, but this ref’s crew was off way off. Nevertheless, good teams will win, despite officiating and we didnt do it.
One more comment about Pats going for it
Not sure if anyone’s made a smart-alec comment about it yet, but since when did Belichick hire Barry Switzer as an advisor?
“4th and short deep in your own territory? Go for it Bill!”
I'm tired of the RB rotation method.
The idea is that you have a specific back specifically to be the change of pace needed to give the starter rest. We are over utilizing our 2nd and 3rd RB’s. The way they Garrett has been calling it is destroying momentum. MB3 was doing great until they switched him out for Jones, disrupting his momentum. Jones couldn’t do anything, and yet it looked like he was in the package much more than Barber or Choice. With Barber looking good, the rotation should not be so heavy. I would almost trust Choice more now than Jones.
When running the ball, reps should look like this.
Barber: 15-20
Choice: 8-12
Jones: 6-8
The most effective carrier should always be getting more reps. Jones is not that guy. Period
by Alexcomestokill on Nov 16, 2009 7:13 PM CST via mobile reply actions
said last week
that I was holding my breath that the line would stay together…well, there goes that hope. Raf is right , one more injury to the line and we ARE pretty much finished If that happens, it WILL be 3 yards and a cloud of dust for the rest of season, if we are lucky. Oh for some linemen that would have panned out in past drafts:((

by 























