The VRR: Cowboys Can Ride Three-game Win Streak for Only So Long
For the second week in a row, the Cowboys defeated their opponent in dominating fashion. The team's offensive, defensive, and special teams units outplayed, out-muscled, and simply outperformed Seattle on its way to a 38-17 victory.
As soon as the fourth quarter began, it was becoming more and more obvious that Dallas could not be caught. That felt good, but only for so long. Those scoring updates on FOX did little to shield us from the anxiety of how well the Eagles, the Cowboys' next opponents, were dismantling the Giants.
Admit it, you were staring at that big, blue star on the turf at Cowboys Stadium, but the peripheral view of your imagination was skipping ahead to next week, to Lincoln Financial Field.
We, fans, usually use Monday and Tuesday to relish and reflect on Sunday's game. On Wednesday, we are ready to transition. Nevertheless, the players, the coaches, and the media are already thinking Philadelphia. It was evident from the very first question in today's press conference with Coach Phillips.
But before we look to the future, let's first look to the recent past to see how this team achieved its 5-2 record yesterday. Here's what Coach Phillips had to say today about the performance of his players against the Seahawks.
Make the jump.

DL: Phillips seemed most impressed with this group. He singled out Jay Ratliff for his ability to play injured, while maintaining his high performance level. He also credited Stephen Bowen with a nice game, saying he plays his role well.
LBs: Bobby Carpenter (6 tackles, 1 sack) was the first named mentioned, here. He said it's "good to see him step up" and that he seems to be getting better and better in his role. He also mentioned Keith Brooking's consistency (12 tackles, 1 sack) and DeMarcus Ware (8 tackles, 1 sack).
DBs: Phillips calls Jenkins and Scandrick the "sophomore sensations". He says that they challenged Scandrick during the week to regain the technique he had last year. Scandrick responded well, he said, noting that he was supposed to have help on the TD caught on him. He seemed pleased that Jenkins had a quiet game, which simply meant he was doing his job well; and, he credited Newman for "making plays".
OL: He said that Leonard Davis had one of his best games with "knockdowns" and "runovers".
RBs: Their performance, he collectively called "solid". Their pass-blocking continues to impress him.
WRs: The "confidence we have in those guys is warranted," Phillips said. He noted how well they run with the ball after the reception (singling out Hurd's score) and then poked fun at Miles Austin for his inablity to dunk the ball over the goalpost. He also noted that the two P.I. calls on Seattle should also be seen as "big plays" by Austin.
Romo/Roy: "Tony doesn't throw many bad balls," he said. He has faith, as do the rest of the coaches, that all the work they do in practice, along with the talent between the two will pan out. He likens it do Ware's lack of sacks early in the season. The players all just keep working harder and harder until it produces for them on the field.
ST: They have been "special." Other than his giving credit to Crayton and the return teams, Phillips likes what he sees from the coverage units. Buehler and McBriar help, and guys like Hurd, Pat Watkins, Victor Butler, and Alan Ball all have great games covering kicks.
Young players: Phillips stressed that getting Hurd, Kevin Ogletree, and Doug Free in the game was not a direct effect of having the game in hand. These are three young players that the coaches feel they wanted to get some more game experience.

Keith Brooking is excited about this team, but cautious about "drinking the Cowboy Kool-Aid".
"We are just now starting to see all the hard work and sacrifices we’ve made come into fruition, and it’s a good feeling," Cowboys linebacker Keith Brooking said. "That’s the reason we play this game. This is so much fun. That’s the reason I came here — to be a part of Sundays like this. I’m just excited about my football team, our football team, the way we’re coming together."
"There’s a fine line, though. We need to enjoy it, but everyone’s going to be drinking the Cowboy Kool-Aid here and telling us how great we are and how good we’re doing. We have a long way to go and a lot of football to play. As long as we prepare the way we’ve been preparing and come out on the field with confidence on Sunday, we’re going to be right where we want to be."

Bobby Carpenter got in on the sack action yesterday, but this is the second straight game the defense has gotten off to a slow start.
"I've been saving them up," joked Carpenter, whose last sack before Sunday came on Dec. 16, 2006, when he dropped Michael Vick 11/2 times in a win over the Falcons in Atlanta. "When you've got a team that can bring pressure from all angles, it makes it easy for guys to get sacks because they can't afford to double-team guys."
While Dallas celebrated having at least three sacks in each of its last five games, the Cowboys weren't happy about giving up points on their opponents' opening drive a second straight game.
"We performed well, but at the same time, we can't start off slow like this every Sunday," said Jay Ratliff, who had three tackles after being listed as questionable Friday with a knee injury. "We have to come out fired up and remain that way until the end."

The Dallas offense is more sweet than bitter right now. If Tony Romo can just get on the same page with a certain wide receiver, the sky would be the limit for this team.
On getting on the same page with Roy Williams:
"We have to watch the tape. We have to see why certain things are different ways. I missed him on a big route early in the game; I have to bring the ball down some. But he’s doing good. He’s running good routes and he’ll be fine. It’s just a matter of going back and looking at the tape and seeing what we have to do better. It’s just part of growing with a receiver or group."
Coach Phillips, yesterday, on the 9-11 disconnection.
"I still see Roy and Tony not on the same page," coach Wade Phillips said. "They're getting closer, they talk to each other afterwards a couple of times. Tony thought he was going to go there and vice versa, so we just got to keep working at that. Roy is tough to catch on that slant pass on the goal line."
Here is the transcript of Coach Phillips' post-game press conference, courtesy of Scout.com.

Remember, Romo and another "Bigg" time player allowed the Cowboys to restructure their contracts so that the team could afford to re-sign players, such as DeMarcus Ware. Great teamwork!
Tony Romo and Leonard Davis both let the Cowboys move some of their bonus money around in the spring of 2008 to save room for future signings, including Ware's extension. By shifting their bonus deferment Romo and Davis combined to save the Cowboys roughly $8 million against this season's cap.

Jason Witten's climb-up-the-TE-record books watch:
Witten’s 36 yards today gave him 5,283 for his career and allowed him to pass Russ Francis (5,262) and tie Keith Jackson for 16th all-time among league tight ends.
Witten caught four passes in today’s game to give him 466 for his career and break a tie with Mickey Shuler for ninth on the NFL’s all-time tight ends receptions list. He is 14 catches behind Jackie Smith (480) for eighth.

The punt return game is back on in Big D. Only five other guys have two TD-returns in one season for the team.
Patrick Crayton became the sixth Cowboy to have two punt returns for TDs in a season and only the second to do it in consecutive weeks.
Really, no false starts?
The pre-snap penalties that hounded the Dallas Cowboys' offense in the previous two games were eliminated in Sunday's win against Seattle.
The Cowboys' offense ran 67 plays with only one penalty: the team-high fourth holding call of the season against tight end Martellus Bennett. It represented an improvement from the previous two games, when the offense had six false starts and one illegal formation.
0 recs |
109 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
its been a long time since Cowboys football felt this fun
now lets crush the Eagles!
by holycowboy on Nov 2, 2009 2:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't it just a couple weeks ago....
I seem to remember probably some of the most out of hand moaning and groaning on these boards I’ve seen since Parcels second season as HC….
Now that feels like it was light years ago since y’all were cussin at each other :-)
Sure feels sooooo good to have that over with…
I hope these Cowboys keep makin all the ones with the swinging door prints on their butts feel silly….
…. you know who you were…. :-)
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
....Annoy a Liberal... Work Hard and Be Happy
by DWARE for Prez on Nov 2, 2009 10:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bring on the Eagles
It’ll be close till the second half, when we pull away.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
by MrMinority on Nov 2, 2009 2:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
This team's track record...
…has been to beat the Eagles comfortably in the first match-up of the season, and then lose decisively in the second match-up.
However, this is further into the season than we usually play them. Andy Reid ALWAYS comes up with his best game plans for us (and it bothers me to no end— he’s a pass-happy maniac the rest of the year and then he plays us and suddenly they’re perfectly balanced), so I’ll always be nervous heading into a second half of the season game against Philly. Particularly on the road.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Nov 2, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we beat them pretty handedly in 2007
during a Sunday night game in November. The game Witten had his helmet ripped off and he almost scored.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 2, 2009 7:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And then Garcia trounced us in the rematch, right? Or am I thinking of 2006?
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Nov 2, 2009 11:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garcia beat us in 2006
the 2007 home game was the Jessica pink jersey game.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 3, 2009 7:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but..
Even if Westbrook plays he isn’t healthy, and unlike the Giants, we won’t get torched by Weaver (!!! lol). I think the Eagles will turn one-dimensional really quickly. Plus, this is a much different Cowboys team than last year. The defense is playing extremely solid and the offense seems like it has 15 weapons to choose from. Should be interesting. We need to keep the penalties and turnovers down. Romo still had that fumble that set up that late TD Sunday otherwise the defense only gives up a 10 spot.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
by Young Wiz on Nov 3, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh, forgot to mention the best thing about Coach Wade's presser...
NO NEW INJURIES!
Other than a couple guys a little banged-up…bumps and bruises stuff, I assume.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 3:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
yay! Knock on wood.
to be heading into the game with Philly with basically our entire roster intact and ready to play is huge. We’ve been really fortunate so far this year with injuries compared to last year and to other teams this year. Barber out for a game, Felix and Sensi for a couple, some other nicks and bruises, but after having such bad luck with our draft class with injuries during camp and preseason, we’ve been fortunate, and it is especially good to be heading into this big game for first place in the division with a full, healthy roster.
by scottmaui on Nov 2, 2009 5:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good news
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 3, 2009 2:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas opens +3
I guess the oddsmakers think it’s an even matchup. Normal homefield advantage is 2 or 3.
Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.
by DIRE WOLF on Nov 2, 2009 3:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Dallas + 3 means Philly is favored.
Due to homefield advantage.
by Damnsammit on Nov 2, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes its in philly
I love to dallas win in philly but obviously they have struggled there in the past..I had these 2 splitting this year so i will stick with that prediction…Dallas very well could win the next 3 out of 4 games which will put them in great position..However they must split the next 2 ..philly and gb..I love to see them win both but i must be realistic…
by scandrick32 on Nov 2, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bye dawk
You must admit that this dallas team is looking better than you gave them credit for..You killed our o line who have played very well thus far…You have also beat up on our defense who seems to be comming on right now and playing well as a unit.. Either way should be a good game…
by scandrick32 on Nov 2, 2009 3:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You must admit that this dallas team is looking better than you gave them credit for
On the whole, absolutely.
You killed our o line who have played very well thus far…
Well, I did and I didn’t. I’ve never hammered the starters for their talent. I hammered the OL as a whole for their extremely frightening combination of very old starters (all of whom are 31 years of age or older), and their totally inadequate depth. So far, they’ve defied the odds and all 5 starters have stayed healthy (and I hope they remain healthy). However, if these 5 guys were my OL, my fear would be that they could eventually wear down as the season progresses. You see what’s happening in DC with their old OL? That’s no coincidence.
But you’re right… They’ve been good so far, certainly better than I had anticipated.
You have also beat up on our defense who seems to be comming on right now and playing well as a unit.
That’s where I’ll disagree. The D has been bad in more than a few games I’ve seen. I missed the Seahawks game (my first Dallas miss of the season), so I can’t comment on that (although from what I hear they played well). Maybe there’s some improvement, but I’ve seen some pretty poor performances there. They have some pretty significant holes.
by Bye, Dawk :( on Nov 2, 2009 4:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, I'm surprised at how the Eagles O-line dominated the Giants O-line.
Were you expecting that kind of performance from guys like Winston Justice?
by Joon on Nov 2, 2009 5:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Justice has been a really pleasant surprise... but not dominant.
At the beginning of the season, when Shawn Andrews decided that he just really doesn’t want to play football, I couldn’t possibly fathom having Winston Justice play a full season as the starter at RT. Quite frankly, I didn’t think he’d make the team heading into camp.
But he’s been great. Here’s why…
- They give him a lot of help. They chip with the running backs on his side constantly and the TE almost always lines up on the right side.
- LT Jason Peters has been excellent. He gave up a sack and a fumble to Osi Umenyiora this week, and a sack/fumble against the Redskins last week. But otherwise he’s been fantastic. He’s been playing with 3 backups on the OL all season, and has gotten absolutely NO help whatsoever. None. The Eagles have put him by himslef on an island against guys like Julius Peppers, Richard Seymour, Andre Carter, Osi Umenyiora, Will Smith, etc, and aside from 2 bad plays, he’s been outstanding. Justice has benefitted by the play of Peters immensely because the Eagles have been able to shift protection his way.
- Against the Giants in particular, they ran a number of screens successfully early, which forced the Giants DE’s respect it, helping negate their pass rush. And once the Eagles got a nice lead, they had the luxury of pounding the run. The Giants never really had the chnace to pin their ears back and rush the passer.
by Bye, Dawk :( on Nov 2, 2009 5:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
LT Jason Peters has been excellent. He gave up a sack and a fumble to Osi Umenyiora this week, and a sack/fumble against the Redskins last week.
Yeah, that is excellent, for Dallas and especially D-Ware!
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 3, 2009 2:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oline
I think we all agree, the problem with the Cowboy’s oline is age and depth, so it puts them in a tenuous situation if any of the starters goes down, but as long as the starters are healthy, they are generally very good, in both run blocking and pass protection.
as for the D, they have been consistently improving through the season, which is what we want to see. In the early games they were inconsistent, sometimes giving up big ground gains, sometimes big air gains, especially at the very end of games, but they have really come together well in basically the last 3 games, minus just the final drive when the Chiefs were able to tie it up, but even in that game they came back out and shut them down despite good field position in two consecutive drives in overtime. The run stuffing has been pretty consistently good, the pass rush is getting better, the secondary is coming together and playing well and hitting hard, the two are feeding off of each other, and they really don’t have any significant holes that have shown up the last few games.
by scottmaui on Nov 2, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas D Is A Concern
Too many gashes up the middle; giving up long sustained drives to inferior offenses.
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think this philly game will be tougher than GB....
i think if we can beat philly…and that is a big IF…i would bet that we go on to beat GB and then wash and oakland at home…then the real fun begins…DECEMBER
by McLovin9 on Nov 2, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
But hopefully in week 17 we can have some payback …I hope the birds will need that win too make the playoffs lmaoooo …That would be somthing if it came to that…
by scandrick32 on Nov 2, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think (being optimistic) we'll be 11-4/10-5 when week 17 rolls around...
unfortunately the outcome of the 2nd philly game will likely depend on what the other teams in the conference (and division) are doing….minny, new orleans, nyg…..but would love to put a dagger thru their hearts and go into playoffs on that note
by McLovin9 on Nov 2, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
GreenBay is a welter weight
Philly is a heavy weight, no contest. Green Bay could get lucky and beat Dallas. Philly just has to be good to beat Dallas
by AustonianAggie on Nov 2, 2009 6:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, I'm not afraid of GB in GB.
We can beat them there. Philly is the toughest game of this month, hands down. Of course Washington always plays up to us when we are good, and vice versa, so they could be a difficult game, as well.
But Dallas at Philly is the game of the week. Can we match the intensity level of the Eagles this week? Regardless, if I were a betting man, and I’m not, I’d bet the OVER on this game.
by mdlusk on Nov 4, 2009 4:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great round up
Next week’s game will be tough, but who wants marshmallows for dinner? I mean, other than my 16 year old.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 2, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I guess NO needs to win tonight.
That would seem to help Dallas in the playoff picture the most. That is in the wildcard race.
Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.
by DIRE WOLF on Nov 2, 2009 4:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
we dont need no stinking wild card - we're winning the division!!
cheer for Atlanta so we can play at home throughout the playoffs!
by McLovin9 on Nov 2, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just in case
Tom Landry=the greatest football mind ever.
by DIRE WOLF on Nov 2, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree; Screw Wild Card
If we can’t win the division, then we are not good enough to matter in the playoffs anyway.
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This isn't a sissy-la-la division.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 6:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The 2006 Steelers would disagree
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 2, 2009 6:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Winning the division would be nice
but only a fraction of how nice it could be to win 3 or 4 playoff games
by AustonianAggie on Nov 2, 2009 7:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Penalty reduction
What a breath of fresh air that is. Hopefully the ‘Boys can continue to improve on the mental mistakes. Without them I believe Dallas can keep pace with any team in the league. Philly will provide a true litmus test of Dallas’ improvement in all areas. I think our ST might prove the difference maker in this game.
by Keys80 on Nov 2, 2009 4:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
good write-up Aaron
I love the volume of info you put forth. You hit all the hot buttons I was wanting to know about.
My question to you is: Can we hold Philly under 35?
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
by HudBaby on Nov 2, 2009 4:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I did not know that about Davis and Romo restructuring their deals
I am really impressed by that. I give them a lot of respect, and it really shows that they want to win. Secondly, I don’t understand the big deal is with the “911 connection” or disconnection or whatever you want to call it. Romo hit 10 different receivers yesterday. He spreads the ball, hits guys that gets open, and has been playing fantastic. We got rid of TO for a reason, we shouldn’t have to get guys the ball to keep them happy if we are playing well and winning. Its not like Romo is being biased, if Roy gets open, Romo will throw it to him, that is how this offense should work. We don’t need to force the ball to one receiver. I’m sure Roy will be fine, and if not, there is nothing we can do about it. I sure as hell don’t want him to have a quota like TO did.
by witten82 on Nov 2, 2009 4:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Austin didn’t get as many yards yesterday, but he was still effective. He and Williams drew PI calls, which moves the chains, too. Romo (and any QB) is much more effective when a defense can’t espcet to get the ball back by locking down one receiver.
by illcowboy on Nov 2, 2009 5:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
911 Is About Misconnections
Roy is not catching the passes thrown his way; some are off the mark, some are dropped. This is distinct from the throwns not made
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 6:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Which means he either steps it up, or else he doesn’t get the ball. I understand what your saying, but I was just confused because it seems like some people want Roy to get the ball because we paid so much for him. Like, Romo needs to get Roy the ball to make this offense better, rather than the offense is doing great and if Roy doesn’t step it up, he will continue to have a small role. I know you don’t believe we need to get him the ball, I’m just explaining my perception of some other people’s thoughts.
by witten82 on Nov 2, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Premature ...
to scoreboard watch. I have learned that if a team takes care of their own business, the other stuff falls into place.
Way too early for figuring out who falls into what playoff spot! lets beat the Eagles, and go from there.
by spadesking131313 on Nov 2, 2009 5:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Scratching my head in utter bafflement at this "not on the same page" story
I’m still willing to give RW the benefit of the doubt, but just how long does it take to get onto the same page with your QB?
- Michael Crabtree (he of the stupidly long holdout) had six catches for 81 yards in his second NFL game yesterday.
- Percy Harvin is lighting it up with a quarterback who wasn’t even on the team during preseason.
- Other rookies like Jeremy Maclin, Hakeem Nicks and Kenny Britt all have more receiving yards this so far in their first NFL season than RW.
Please Jason, fix this, ideally by next Sunday
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 2, 2009 5:49 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree looked good in his first game, too, no matter if it was Hill or Smith throwing.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 5:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting Point
Roy has a full season now – essentially – and a full offseason; wtf is up with this disconnect?
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 6:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they're playing possum and the pair will explode.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 6:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this is who Roy is.....
a receiver that catches 3-4 passes a game, blocks down field, and an all around team player?
by Road Warrior on Nov 2, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He is what he is ...
and his average rec and yards per game aint like the guy he is replacing here. Never was .. never will be.
Roy is a good blocker and has great size.
I think part of the problem here is Romo’s inability to throw the fade. He struggled with it with Bennett despite a huge size advantage, and the best of my memory he has always struggled with getting the ball up when he attempts a fade. You have to figure the fade is more than likely one of Roy’s favorite routes. .. Romo seems to need to see a player separate, and Roy is not that type of WR. He is a guy who uses his size, like Keyshawn did, that relied on his ability to get high (the height of the throw is critical) and his body to “box out” defenders.
To me, if Romo and Roy can work on a back shoulder throw, much like the pass Manning threw to Plax for so long, it would be difficult to stop because William’s size. Two things need to develope though, Roy has to sell the pattern, and Tony has to anticipate Roy’s route before he sees separation.
by spadesking131313 on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You've now covered
1% of the throws Romo and Roy could hook up on. That explains nothing about the other 99%.
Re-watch Sunday’s game. Romo threw several passes to Austin before his cut, like the inside slant near the goal line. He and Austin have mutual confidence that the pattern is going to be run and the ball is going to be thrown exactly as practiced. I think Romo and Roy do not.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 6:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Romo and Roy do not have that mutual confidence. I even suspect some of Romo’s “inaccurate” throws to Roy are actually the result of Roy not running the pattern exactly the way Romo expects it.
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
by 24Hz on Nov 3, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the hard part
without knowing the play, how the defense changed the route (sight adjustment or getting re-routed for example) and then looking at exactly how it played out, you can’t tell what happened. Which is why Romo and Williams always say “We’ll go back and look at film and talk about what happened”. They don’t even know for sure.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds good to me, but the same can be said about Hurd
and we’ve seen both those guys break out with big plays.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And the same can be said of Witten
Check his stats. Nothing special. But one piece of a winning puzzle.
Did I expect more from Roy when he got here? Hell yeah. But, when Romo is doing what it takes to win (hitting 10 different targets), everyone has to play their role (without complaining).
I’m saying that with all that’s expected of Roy, and his underachieving… he’s at least not complaining. And if you’ll note, the was the first to congratulate Hurd after his score.
As Spade was saying, just when you give up on a guy (not you – per say), he has the capability of a breakout.
Roy will have his games. It might be this week (something tells me with Philly’s pressure we’ll be looking for the possession receiver early).
by Road Warrior on Nov 2, 2009 7:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, I'm not too worried.
The team is winning as a team and the fact that not everything is working in perfect fashion just gives something for them to focus and work on. If a team like Philly focuses on shutting down Austin, then Romo can pick them apart down the middle and maybe even feature some different targets like MartyB or RBs out of the backfield.
When it all comes down, the defense is what will bring this team to true dominance. And they seem to be making nice adjustments and each growing into their roles.
What’s nice about this year is that it seems when guys are in a slump, they eventually respond in a positive way that helps the team.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 7:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bingo!
When we start losing games because RW and Romo can’t “connect”, then we can worry. otherwise . . . it’s Jerry’s money and Stephens salary cap headache.
As for defensive dominance: If the other team can’t score, we can’t lose.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
by Uncle Angus on Nov 3, 2009 6:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NO ANGUS!
We should worry about all the irrelevant stuff too! For example, did anyone else notice that Felix doesn’t double-tie his laces?? It’s a disaster waiting to happen. Why doesn’t Wade suspend him until he gets his head on straight? And it’s clear to the casual observer that Bennett didn’t look remorseful enough after breaking off his pattern. I know it was a blow-out win, but against the 1970s Steelers in a driving snow storm with seconds left on the clock, he COULD HAVE lost the game.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 7:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He really should double-knot.
It’s not that hard to do.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's Wade's fault
if they practiced double-ties in practice, they wouldn’t be screwing it up come game time.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The real problem could be that Jerry never hired a GM
or that Garrett is too pass happy. And if you don’t think that double-knots have been a real problem yet, you just wait until December, that’s when the Cowboys always trip over their laces. And one more thing, some of the guys that are tying double-knots aren’t tying them tight enough, especially Flo and Carp.
Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden
by BishopWest on Nov 3, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This team is just ate straight up
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But they don't want to strain a hammy
while bending over to practice tying their shoelaces ;-)
The one (of four) unsnapped snaps on chin straps are what drives me crazy, though. Attention to detail is the only way we’re going to improve!
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
by 24Hz on Nov 3, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cuz Wade uses velcro!
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Velcro is for the mentally weak
More push ups Aaron.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine.

I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ON A SWISS BALL??????????????
How Pilates of you. I’m at the end of my rope. We’re sending you to squidlo’s “Backyard Deep Snapper Camp?”.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, you ever try doing pushups on those things?
Not easy.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 3, 2009 1:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It it's not made of iron
or some other caveman material, I’m just not interested. I’m totally throwback/old school when it comes to the gym.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 2:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The disconnect all comes down to how they are making their decisions...
You can pick up a football with a receiver and be instantly on with the guy if the WR reads the D and makes the same adjustments as the QB is expecting him to make (what angle to run the route, how and where to break off the route, etc.). Right now though, Roy and Romo are seeing different things out there. Romo reads the defense and expects Roy to run one way, but Roy reads the defense and does something different or is not quite in the right spot. It really is a type of organic chemistry that changes depending on the people involved and their previous experiences. And while I know that seems like it should be easy to fix, it really is more fickle than that. The perfect example would be Miles Austin who couldn’t run a good route for Tony against Denver and then blows up the next week after he says he worked his hardest. Hopefully Tony and Roy work even harder this week and begin to truly get on the same page.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 2, 2009 7:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I read some article on the toilet the other day that WR routes are becoming alot more improvisational than planned.
The writer used Reggie Wayne and Manning as an example. Instead of running the prescribed route in the huddle, Wayne will change it up based on how he’s reading the DB. Manning knows him so well that he can “see” the same thing as Wayne, which often leads to a completion.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 7:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Woah thats interesting
wonder if thats pissing off the coaches. Are there any similarities between our O and Indys O?
BTW…too much info on WHERE you read the article, but thanks bro
by fretman on Nov 2, 2009 8:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
I couldn’t remember which mag it was and I already took out the trash…could’ve been ESPN the Mag or SI.
Anyways, it was all about basic route-running vs what’s really ran after the snap. Just made me think that there could be something to certain WRs being on the same “page” with certain QBs. A 9-route could turn into an 8-route in an instant based on the WRs decision.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 8:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah hah
I have ESPN the mag on the back of my terlet too. Not for reading though LOL. Seems like RW might be guilty of undiciplined routes
by fretman on Nov 2, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
or just thinking too much
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree wasn't really holding out.
He was unsigned and negotiating his contract. I think it’s a big difference between what he did and a guy who is already under contract choosing to not come to camp.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 2, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree was holding out for the contract he wanted.
I suppose a guy who’s already under contract can hold out for a new one, but both are hold outs.
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Nov 3, 2009 7:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How was he holding out when he wasn't signed?
Of course he isn’t going to come in and play and train without being under contract. If you’re offered a job but choose not to accept it, are you holding out?
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 3, 2009 8:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think everyone agrees with you in principle
it’s the semantics of “hold out”
Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK
by HudBaby on Nov 3, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Best point I've seen recently
Personally I think they’ll click eventually BUT…There’s something weird going on here. You could see it in Romos face before Austin exploded. So weird how Romo hits Witten, Crayton. Austin, Bennett, Ogletree, Hurd no problem…but some throws to RW aren’t even close
by fretman on Nov 2, 2009 8:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What if Atlanta comes out and waxes New Orleans, tonight?
Things that make you go hmmm.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 6:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Dallas would then go up; a notch in my view
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 6:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And then, what if Dallas creams Philly?
Gawd, we have to wait a whole week for this.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Aaron you make a good point about the pre-snap penalties
It is also a point that Brooking keeps making. One of the big reasons for the turn arround is the Cowboys are not beating themselves anymore.
by cowboy1966 on Nov 2, 2009 7:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Seattle sure was doing alot to hurt themselves yesterday.
Let’s hope the Cowboys used this game to fine-tune such things for next week and beyond.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 8:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how much of the false start improvement is a result
of the Cowyboys getting up to the line earlier?
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
by 24Hz on Nov 3, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It sure could be
and they seem to execute better too – blitz pick up for example.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 3, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Dallas Creams Philly
Then they are the cream of the crop and I will cream my pants
by Iowacowboy on Nov 2, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Plan on going shopping next Monday.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
man
We are going to need Barber to ball out. He is going to be in the game a lot because of his ability to pass protect. Screens please, we have to minimize the penalties, and stay out of obvious passing situations.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Nov 2, 2009 10:03 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
This may be a stretch, but we can assume that the 44-6 memory has put its target on this upcoming game.
The Cowboys this season took their #1 in the league rushing attack and shelved it during the bye—only to come out with a preference to air it out the last two games.
One of the great things about doing so is that these backs have each got a crash course in picking up blitzes (and have looked darn good doing it). With the Eagles coming up, one has to wonder if they were prepping a bit to take on such a blitzing D.
I can see for miles and miles and miles and miles and miles...
http://twitter.com/BloggingTheBoys
by Aaron Novinger on Nov 2, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
it’s a stretch at all. That 44-6 loss was huge for the decisions management made in the off season. The Cowboys should be breathing fire for this one considering it’s in exactly the same place of their previous embarassment. How this team plays this week will go a long way ( in my eyes) of determining if this team has real playoff potential. Not if they win or lose, but HOW they play.
by jevans1729 on Nov 2, 2009 10:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except that football scores are not subject to the transitive property.
case in point: Miami beat down Georgia Tech who beat Virginia Tech who beat down Miami. Who’s the best team among the three?
“Any given Sunday.”
by mdlusk on Nov 4, 2009 4:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no let down.
I was seriously concerned about a let down after the big win over ATL; I realize we still have more than half the season to go but my gut is telling me this team has turned the corner. While we may not have the talent to make it to the big Soup Bone, I feel confident we will be competitive the rest of the year…even in December.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
by angie'sdad on Nov 2, 2009 6:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
does anybody have a link for tonights game to watch it on the inetrent?
Im overseas with no BSPN
by ManTab on Nov 2, 2009 7:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Romo Rankings..
Romo has played himself back in to the Top 5 QB conversation. His accuracy and ball security has dramatically improved. 10 diff WRs with catches- that is smart football.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Nov 2, 2009 10:00 PM CST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
as the proud owner of two loud, aggressive dogs
I can’t wait to see D-Ware attack vick. But…then again, he’s only been in a few plays a game, and I can’t help but respect McNabb. This will be a great game for sure, but I’m pretty optimistic.
by SB2008 on Nov 2, 2009 10:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
random
Hasn’t romo being really good coincided with valerie bertinelli making fun of him?
"I just want to comment on how it’s become like a common thing in the [MLB] for guys to fall in love with [the Rangers’s] sloppy seconds." (thanks cstorm)
by ab03 on Nov 3, 2009 9:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe, maybe not...
Why in the hell do we got to be talking about the down-side of the Cowboys so early in the week?…Aaron even though I like your input on WR, I think it is non-applicable to what we are talking about with RW…If he and Romo had the relationship with each other that Wayne/PManning have Id say you make a good point, but geez, they have yet to get to much over 500yds in a season, so they cant be that tuned into each other yet…I personally think RW is about as much of a bust as Dallas has ever had(not downplaying the Joey Galloway trade much)…Anyways I think that Dallas has proven from the outswet of this season that we are THE BEST DAMN TEAM IN THE NFL, period…Sure we lost to 2 teams with (up until last week 11/2 record)..by mere points…Now how, how , how can we improve, other than not killing ourselves which we did in both games, and lost by 9 points combined…Cmon, geniuses tell me how in the hell do you improve a defense that shuts down the Offense of an opponent the N O R M A L L Y expected amount of time, and then has to do EXTRA DUTY when OUR offense insists on handing the opposing team the game…HOW can we be anything but optomistic, if we can have a turnover of -6 or -7 and still only loose to our opponent by mere yards, and seconds?…The only frikking team that beat Dallas this year is Dallas, and we know it, the She-Gals know it, and the Gnats went home knowing it…C’mon, dawgs, represent and stop dissing the BOYZ on what was predestined to happen…I mean I am talking to rational football minded guys am I not…Everyone knows we got a better team this year (well just as good without the drama) as we did last year, and that is +2 games right there…that would have gotten us into the Playoffs last year…We got rid of that “other” receiver now we have twice the reception power, and rotating them the way Garrett does, is turning out to be A W E S O M E…Every damn Sportswriter in the country wanted to know where Dallas was going to find the firepower to replace that “other” reciever, and we found it in the lockerroom all along in Austin…500 yrds plus and 6TDs…in 3 frikking games is something we should have had last year, but because of the lockerroom distractions we didnt have a chance to really check it out…Now Jerry Jones is going to have to find some money to keep Miles in Dallas for a long time, considering he is an un-RFA at the end of the season…Yeah we can franchise him, but wouldnt we much rather keep him as a willing player?..Now as for the game on Sunday with the She-Gals, its gonna be like the blow-out in ’07…no doubt about it…Romo aint got any pressure on him no more, cause now he KNOWS he can perform top level without that “other” reciever grabbing at his gonads any longer…YES we have the defense to stop those 2 ROOKIES who have been extremely luck at times(watch the Raiders game)..yes we have the firepower(also we have the pleasant opportunity to play fresh WR and TEs thruout the game…Remeber in "07 when Linc Field(eeeewwwww, that place gives anybody the creeps), was 3/4 empty by the middle of the 3rd QTR?…its going to be worse this Sunday, cause I dont think the FILTHYFOWLZ can hang with us when we got game like we do now…What are they gonna do run the DAWGBOY Michael Vick, and his weak assed attempts at the WildCat at us…LMAO….Is he still playing for FilthyVille these days or is he still out chasing cars, and rounding up the strays around Filthy?…Romo is throwing 2-3 TDs for the last 4 games in a row, and he is doing it with CONSISTENCY, and without INTs…McFlabb will be busted up just like we busted up Favre when he came to Dallas in ’07…Hes already a single sack away(well maybe just a 1/2 a sack with the “sports injury” he had in ’06)…DWare is gonna tear that boy a new one..Peters and Andrews…wtf???..LMAO…they couldnt hold rain-water in a barrel..I mean the She_Gals gave up more on defense last year(Dawkins, Considine, Thomas, Sheppard) than they could replace thru FA, and the draft…We all know that it was Dawkins last year that had the game on us in Filthy…2 fumbles, and an INT…We hes no longer there, and were supposed to be afraid of what, a couple of 2nd, 3rd year CB, and a safety who is already pissed-off cause he said they were treating him like a “red headed stepchild”…Cmon lets face we know what we are…We are a top rated NFL franchise, just a couple of mistakes and some outright sheer luck shy of being 7-0…Thats what the She-Gals know, thats what the Skins know, and the Gnats absolutely know it, cause if not for them mistakes they would be 5-4 and already packing their crap up for the long offseason…JMO…FEAR THE STAR
…
by Hawgz, Bugz, and FilthyFowl Hater on Nov 3, 2009 2:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Consider this advice as coming from a friend
According to www.plainlanguage.gov
Long paragraphs discourage readers from even trying to understand your material; short paragraphs are easier to read and understand. Writing experts recommend paragraphs of no more than 150 words in three to eight sentences.
Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden
by BishopWest on Nov 3, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cliff Notes please
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Nov 3, 2009 5:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















