Wade's Defense Will Guide the Cowboys' December Ship
The legend lives on from the NFL on down,
of the good ship they call Dallas Cowboys,
The team it is said, can be given up for dead,
when the skies of December turn gloomy...-- not Gordon Lightfoot, not The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald
Cock your head and you can hear it. The calendar turns to December tomorrow, and just as sure as the winter, the howling about the Cowboys' December collapses has begun. The subject has gained a mythic quality; it seems not so much an option as an inevitability: a tough December schedule looms and the good team is doomed. Doomed because its captain, Tony Romo, a sailor born by the sea, loses his compass when the weather turns cold and the pass rushes fierce.
Or so the myth sellers say. Is Romo truly a sunshine sailor? Are the Cowboys at the mercy of his mercurial December play? Grab your coats and your gloves and follow me on some football forensics, as we find out what really has caused the good ship Cowboys to wreck over and over again.
2005
The Cowboys crashes started before Tony Romo, and Wade Phillips, and most of the current players joined the squad. Bill Parcells' bunch gritted and grunted their way through injuries which claimed projected RT Jacob Rogers in Oxnard and LT Flozell Adams after six games. When Dallas beat Detroit on November 20, it was 7-3. On Thanksgiving Day, the Cowboys took a 13-3 Denver team to overtime, but lost when Ron Dayne broke a long, controversial run, which set up a Jason Elam field goal.
This disappointment was the first of many, as Dallas went 2-4 from November 21st to the finale against the Rams. The offensive line surrendered eleven sacks in two painful division losses to the Giants and Redskins. The latter let Washington leapfrog the Cowboys into the playoffs. That line, for those of you who have effectively disavowed it:
- LT -- Torrin Tucker
- LG -- Larry Allen
- C - Al Johnson
- RG -- Marco Rivera
- RT - Rob Petitti
Doug Free, for all his uncertainty, would probably star with that bunch. Allen's tread was worn, Rivera broke down after fourteen games and Tucker and Petitti were playing their last months as Cowboys. Bill Parcells and Jeff Ireland never could draft o-linemen in Dallas and it hurt them badly here.
2006
Romosexuals were everywhere. The world was Romolicious. The Romom Empire was in the making. Cowboys Nation was positively giddy over its new star, who replaced Drew Bledsoe after the veteran showed terminal shell-shock in a Giants loss at Texas Stadium.
Romo avenged the defeat with a memorable last-minute bomb to Jason Witten in the Meadowlands, which set up Martin Grammatica's last second winner. Dallas was 8-4 and in control.
But storm clouds were looming. Dallas had spoiled an inspired Romo performance at FedEx Field when the special teams bungled a short field goal attempt in the final seconds. The Redskins Shaun Springs blocked it and when Kyle Kosier was flagged for a facemask penalty while tackling him, Washington got to attempt their own field goal with no time on the clock. The Redskins made it and stole the win (something the 7-6 grousers should recall).
The secondary was also coming unglued. Aaron Glenn started '06 as Dallas' nickel back, but he lost his top end as the season progressed. Anthony Henry had a balky knee that locked up on him at times, but the coaches kept him in the lineup over Jacques Reeves. At safety, Pat Watkins started the season, but was driven to the bench after the Eagles beat him for two deep touchdown passes in their home win. The ever uncertain Keith Davis replaced him. Roy Williams was showing his freelancing tendencies, ones which would hurt the team badly in their playoff loss to Seattle.
In short, the Cowboys secondary was Terence Newman and a couple cases of duct tape. When Romo blasted Tampa Bay for 5 TDs on Thanksgiving Day, I wrote this warning, noting that the Bucs Joey Galloway had run wild through Dallas' secondary. The Giants didn't exploit it the following week but former Cowboys OC Sean Payton did the following week. Drew Brees riddled that secondary, throwing five TD passes in a 42-17 romp. Mike Vick hit them for four more the week after that, and Jon Kitna put four more past them in the season finale.
The secondary gave up 14 touchdown passes that December; the defense gave up 33 points per game in that span. Romo's guys scored a respectable 24 per game, but they knew they had to get to at least 35 points to have a chance. The offense topped that once, in Atlanta. Not suprisingly, it was Dallas' only win.
The broken pass defense shaped Parcells' thinking. He game-planned to avoid a shootout in Seattle, even though the Seahawks secondary was even more injury-depleted than Dallas'. When Romo dropped that late field goal snap, all the December frustration dropped onto his shoulders. The defense, the most culpable part of the team, snuck quietly out of the locker room.
2007
Dallas roared into December at 11-1, having beaten Green Bay in Texas Stadium, a game many pundits labeled an NFC title game dress rehearsal. The following week, Romo faced down the Tampa-2 demon. Buffalo had intercepted him five times in week five by doubling his receivers, daring Romo to consistently check down. He lacked the patience then to take the short tosses and forced passes into coverage.
In Detroit, HC Rod Marinelli threw the same game plan at Romo. This time, he played Montana-ball: 27 of Romo's 35 completions went to tight ends and backs. He found Jason Witten fifteen times. Their last completion gave Dallas a comeback 28-27 win.
The following week, Romo threw up a stinker, as Dallas lost 10-6 to the Eagles. Their seven game win steak was snapped and Fox's repeated views of Jessica Simpson brought the Memo Paris/Yoko Romo meme into being. Andre Gurode left the game with a knee injury and the doom-meisters crept into the open. Romo had the offense back on track in Carolina the next week until T.O. rolled his ankle just as Dallas was about to score its second early touchdown. The points slowed to a trickle from that point, though Dallas won 20-13.
Romo and many of the starters were pulled minutes into the Redskins season finale. Washington had the chance of facing Dallas in the playoffs, even if the Cowboys beat them, so the coaches treated this as a preseason game. Dallas finished December 2-2. The starters were 2-1, but when the Cowboys lost to New York in the divisional round, the memory of Romo's bye-week Cancun vacation and Jessica in the pink jersey were within easy reach for those wanting a quick, lazy excuse.
Three secondary players whiffed on Amani Toomer's short-catch, long-run TD and Jacques Reeves was Eli Manning's dartboard as the Giants drove the field in 42 seconds for a critical TD just before half. The Bruce Read special teams also allowed a long punt return to set up New York's last TD, but it didn't matter. Jessica had stolen Tony's mojo and the Cowboys season. Romo had produced a decent December, but everything from global warming to the high price of gas was on the cute couple.
2008
Romo opened December with his career stinker. On a cold night in Pittsburgh, Romo frequently overlooked open receivers in the short and intermediate zones to try passes downfield. When he looked short, Tashard Choice made huge catches and runs. Romo did make one of his patented spin-and-scrambles, and found T.O. for an early 3rd quarter score. Despite Romo's many misreads, Dallas had the ball and a ten point lead with just over eleven minutes left.
Then, the entire team unraveled. The first downs stopped coming. The pass defense loosened and the special teams gave up a long punt return to give the Steelers a very short field. Pittsburgh stunned Dallas with 17 late points. The defense rebounded to crush the Giants, sacking Eli Manning eight times in a 20-8 win, but this unit, which looked Doomsdayesque after the bye, completely lost it against Baltimore, giving up 77 and 82 yard runs on back-to-back plays in a 33-24 loss. The team seemed to give up there. They brought nothing to Philadelphia and were pasted 44-6. The D held for one series, but did nothing after Donovan McNabb found Correll Buckhalter off a scramble that set up Philly's first touchdown.
Dallas went 1-3 down the stretch and though the D gave up 32 points per game in the three losses, Romo again wore the horns. Romo, who ran an offense which had no speed and atrophied muscles in a December when it faced the NFL's 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th ranked scoring defenses. The line played the full season with Cory Proctor at left guard. Flozell Adams didn't miss a start despite a neck stinger which weakened one arm and an extreme finger infection which required antibiotic IV drips to treat it.
Dallas' skill position players dropped away one by one. Felix Jones never returned after his game six hamstring injury. Marion Barber never had great speed and was even slower after tearing ligaments in a pinkie toe. Sam Hurd broke an ankle in Arizona and went on I.R. Miles Austin went on the injured list three different times.
Roy Williams developed plantar fasciitis in a heel after the Thanksgiving Day win and lost his spring: he averaged 15.4 yards per catch in his November starts and 4.6 in his December games. Terrell Owens saw his production ebb. He racked up garbage yards in the second half of the Eagles blowout but averaged 44 yards in the other December games.
The Dallas attack came down to Tashard Choice's legs and Jason Witten's guts. The Senator suffered a broken rib in the Bengals week five win and rolled an ankle later in the season. Still, he soldiered on, and provided Romo's only consistent receiving target. Jason Garrett put Romo in the shotgun to protect him but it provided little respite from the rush; Romo was sacked 7 times in his first nine starts but thirteen times that December.
The offensive injuries meant the team was going as far as the defense could carry them and when the secondary again faltered, another season went down the drain.
What can we conclude from these shipwrecks of Decembers past?
- The December drops predate Romo. He was carrying a clipboard in '05 when the o-line sprung three leaks and Drew Bledsoe followed them to the bottom.
- Romo is good for one big December stinker. Christmas day '06 vs. the Eagles, the 12-6 dud versus the same Eagles in '07 and last year's Steelers abomination fall to Romo. If history offers any guide, one '09 dud remains. (This year's schedule has a surprisingly mild slate of scoring defenses: the 13th rated Eagles and Saints, the 15th rated Chargers and the 24th rated Giants. If you want some prime suspects, look to the Eagles, who cuffed Romo in '06 and '07, and the 7th rated Redskins, who held Dallas to a touchdown two games ago. Dallas has not topped 10 points in its three games against scoring defenses ranked in the top 10)
- The biggest December villain has been the defense, primarily the secondary. They flooded touchdown passes in '06 and long TD runs and passes in '08. They gave up the big pass plays that kept New York in the game during the '07 playoff loss. The offense line played a part in '05 and last year. The special teams also bear some blame. The punt coverage teams figured in the '07 playoff loss and the Steelers loss last year.
2009
What, if anything is different on November 30, 2009?
Let's begin with the special teams, which have improved under Joe DeCamillis. They still can't return kickoffs effectively, but every other unit is better. The kick coverage groups spearhead this unit, so the fears of a new back-breaking return are slim.
On offense, the skill positions look healthy. Witten has again rolled an ankle, but he's probably the worst injured Cowboys this year. The receivers are healthy. Miles Austin has replaced T.O. with '07 Owen- level production. Roy Williams still hasn't found his sea legs, but he's better than his '08 self.
The backs are nicked up, but as healthy or healthier than last year. The line has suffered one serious setback, losing Marc Colombo to a broken fibula. Doug Free has been steady in his two starts.
The pass protection remains a concern. Romo has already been sacked 25 times this year. He went down 20 times in 13 starts last year. This year, at least, Romo has a better running game and far more targets to throw to when he scrambles. Overall, this unit rates a wash. It has averaged just half a point more than last year's crippled squad.
Two September Games Can Mess Up Your Whole Profile
This means December and January, should it come, again depends on the defense. And this bunch offers real reason for hope. Ken Hamlin is out at the moment but should return soon, meaning all eleven of the opening day starters are healthy, as are the key nickel players Orlando Scandrick, Bobby Carpenter and Alan Ball.
Wade 3.0 has finally played up to his reputation. Those of us who praised the defense in camp had embarrassed looks on our faces when they face-planted in September. Tampa ran over them for 174 yards and Eli Manning, Steve Smith and Mario Manningham passed over them for 330 yards the next week. The D ranked 30th after those games, with these horrifying numbers:
438 yards per game; 135 rush yards. per game; 303 pass yards per game
Those stats have polluted the defense's stat lines all year. Look at the team's overall stat lines and rankings, and the averages from the last nine games:
| Games | Yards/Gm. | Rank | Rush YPG | Rank | Pass YPG | Rank | Points PG | Rank |
| 1-2 | 438 | 135 | 303 | 27.0 | ||||
| 3-11* | 303 | 8th | 95 | 7th | 208 | 12th | 14.2 | 1st |
| Season | 327 | 16th | 103 | 7th | 224 | 19th | 16.5 | 2nd |
*Rank shows where the team would rank in the overall standings with these numbers
Since week three, the defense has played at a top level. The yardage numbers for that nine-game stretch are comparable to Wade's '07 and '08 units. The big jump has come in scoring: the '09 Cowboys have been a stingy bunch. Their 16.5 average is almost a touchdown per game better than last year's defense, which allowed 22.8 points per game.
That 16.5 remains in peril. Where last year's December meant navigating four of the top five scoring defenses, this year's schedule brings four of the NFL's top scoring offenses:
- 1st. New Orleans
- 5th San Diego
- 7th Philadelphia
- 10th N.Y. Giants
The Cowboys have contained the three top-10 scoring offenses they've faced since the Giants loss. They held Green Bay to 17, the Eagles to 16 and Atlanta to 21. The Falcons are the only opponent to top 20 points since week two.
When you see the "Perils of December" stories, and some are already around, know that the quarterback may get the attention, but it's the defense which will either navigate the rocky waters at last, or wreck the Cowboys ship again.
Captain Romo, hand the wheel to Captain Ware.
1 recs |
231 comments
|
Comments
Even Aikman was stinking it up in December
Cowboys went between 1997-2001 without having a winning December record, when he was still playing. It’s definitely not all on Romo.
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: not 11-5 :(
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25
yeah, it's a function of team quality
when this team was really good, it could barnstorm december.
The recent Cowboys teams have been good, but no great ones in the bunch. This may be the best defense we’ve seen in a while.
Amen, brother
Pass the mustard.
He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson
I agree on the D
And it seems to me that the iomprovement has been better work out of the whole secondary, Brooking and maybe… Olshansky?
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Not to mention Sensi.
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: not 11-5 :(
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25
Parcells first year blew in December as well
The 2003 team made the playoffs, but started off 8-3, finished 10-6 in the regular season and one and done in the playoffs. Of course, that team was all smoke and mirrors and an easy schedule.
In Quincy I remember...
I’d like to think all is well with Quincy.
nice writeup. very cogent points
we’ll see, cause ready or not, December is coming
Thanks for the nostalgic trip down mempry lane ;)
In all seriousness, this was an excellently researched and well-written article. It’s input like this that makes the SB Nation as good as it is. With your relative health versus the walking trauma wards that are the Giants and Eagles, everything is yet again pointing your way to walk into the playoffs. I of course, will be hoping past practice holds true, but everything comes down to next weekend. I hate putting all the eggs into one basket, but realistically the Giants don’t deserve to go to the playoffs if they can’t come out at home against a division rival with their backs to the wall.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Nov 29, 2009 6:51 PM CST reply actions
It seems like we get teams at the wrong time.
I remember last year Hasselbeck returned to play after being out most of the season. Sure we won, but I’d rather have played against his back up.
Green Bay just lost and was embarrased in the process by the Bucs, and then we come in and they are desperate and playing their butts off.
Now, the Giants are pretty damn desperate with their season on the line, and we get to play them again. Whoo!
And take the Broncos, we play them when they are playing ridiculously well, but now people are all smiles when they see the Broncos on the schedule.
I’m not saying it’s not fair, but it certainly seems the fates are screwing with the Cowboys.
+ Redskins when they are desperate ... + Anyone on Turkey day ...
+ Just win baby :)
note: you could say we were that MUST WIN team in Phily, after last year’s debacle
Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.
LMAO RAF
“The legend lives on from the NFL on down,
of the good ship they call Dallas Cowboys,
The team it is said, can be given up for dead,
when the skies of December turn gloomy…
— not Gordon Lightfoot, not The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald"
FUNNY STUFF!!
HERE IS TO A GREAT FINISH TO THE SEASON!
Wrong!
It’s all Jason Garrett’s fault!!
But seriously, great article Raf and I agree. The key is the D
Garrett can help
I have found myself questioning many of his situational calls throughout the year.
i dont spout “playcalling” when things are bad for the offense. there are times when WRs are running open and romo doesnt get it there, or the WRs just drop it. those are not on garret.
But there are times when I find myself wondering why garrett makes some calls he makes. He ,can, and needs to do better in december.
Jarhead,
Sure, he’s not perfect no doubt but I think overall he helps us win games way more than helps us lose games. I was just poking fun at the "Garrett sucks" crowd.
you cant argue much with the offense's overall performance
since he has been the OC.
I just think there are things he can do better. I’ve really questioned some of his calls down around the goal line, and he puts tremendous pressure on his Oline when he puts Romo in the shotgun on 3rd and +10 while deep in his own territory.
in the two road losses, garrett did just that and gave up huge TOs that lead to points.
with the defense playing the way it is
and a great punter with solid coverage, there are times when you can conceed the drive isnt going to happen and call a draw or screen that likely wont work and punt it.
garretts best year was with sparanno helping..
I think he has talent but it feels like he’s just calling plays from a pre-written script, sometimes its like he’s watching another game he has a terrible feel for the flow of the game…I just wonder how good this team would be with a REAL play caller, but it is what it is, I hope the day never comes when JJ thinks he’ll be a better H.C. Than phillips…jmuncmmqbo..
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
by hashishkabob on Nov 30, 2009 6:02 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
as soon as this defense starts stopping some third and longs ...
Then Wade will have reached the pinnacle with this group.
by alanTdot. on Nov 29, 2009 7:06 PM CST via mobile reply actions
And creating turnovers.
Those may go hand in hand, though. Other teams aren’t scared of the Cowboys getting an interception, so why not take a chance on a long throw?
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:44 PM CST up reply actions
I think they may be starting to fear
Jenkins and Sensei, though, Those guys will steal a ball from the air.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Great read....
The main problem I see this year is the schedule for December…
1. @NYG
2. San Diego
3. @ New Orleans
4. @ Washington
5. Philadelphia
Non of these games will be easy and I wouldn’t be surprised if we 1 – 4 for these games. And I wouldn’t call a december meltdown….it’s simply very tough teams we’re facing (except for the Redskins). IMO we have to ABSOLUTELY beat the Giants (to even the table against them and because they seem weak now) and San Diego cause we’re at home. We simply have to play better than them and win. At that point with 10 wins, just win one more, steal the one from the redskins or something.
We have to be more consistent. This team is starting games very slow and against NO and SD that won’t do. And we certainly have to end the absurd tendency of false starts every-time we hit the red zone. .
If Dallas has any shot of competing deep into the playoffs
The schedule shouldn’t be of that much of a concern. If you can’t consistently compete with and beat the best teams in the league, what’s the point?
by StillHateTheGiants on Nov 29, 2009 7:34 PM CST up reply actions
exactly as Raf said
every game is winnable and every game is loosable. its up to the players to own it to themselves.
exactly
if we can’t beat the teams on the schedule, we don’t deserve to make the playoffs.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Part of it is that you get so beat up that you are physically run down...
once you get into the playoffs. But I agree. Doesn’t matter when or where you play people, you just need to figure out a way to win. Doesn’t matter if we have to play the 3 best teams in the league to win, we just need to win.
Look at what the Giants did, they beat the 2 number 1 seeds, and a #2.
I will throw out that I am tired of the Cowboys getting crap for losing to the Giants when the Packers and Pats lost as well. What, our loss was more damndable?
Great comment..and a nice informative article, Rafael..
I think Man Tab is right on the money here..Phillips is under the microscope right now..Jones hasn’t committed to picking up his option year which even puts more pressure on a guy who has one of the best records in NFL history, now look at what he is facing?..This is a brutal December schedule..that’s just the way the cards were dealt out..Will he be crucified for a negative outcome?..and be fired for not plowing through these five teams you guys face this month?..The only real weak team is Washington on the list..but they are still dangerous given they are division rivals..So say the Cowboys don’t successfully plow through this five game blizzard and as Man states wind up 1-4?..Blame Phillips for it?..Romo?..add more credence to a so-called “December Jinx”? Even though I am a Giants fan, I say that would be pretty damn unfair…I hope we beat you on Sunday, because we have to..and we need to beat the Eagles..Two crucial games. But then if you look at / compare the remainder of our schedule, we face a poor Washington team, a poor Carolina team, and a Vikings team who most likely will not field all of their starters..Do we have a challenge..Absolutely, but it pales when compared to what you guys are facing and therefore it would be unfair to criticise Wade Phillips for a bad December, if in fact that happens..You would have to be an idiot to fire a coach like Wade Phillips. The best thing Jones could do to help is give Wade Phillips a vote of confidence by extending his contract..take that pressure off of him he is under enough as it is..If he does get fired I hope we pick him up to be our DC, until he lands another HC job which he truly deserves..Oh well, sorry for writing a book here.
The absence of #31
in trail postion giving up the big play is probaly the real reason the defense is giving up a touchdown less this year. :)
He hardly even played last year.
And even though he only played 4 games for them this year, the Bengals have the #1 scoring defense in the league.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:45 PM CST up reply actions
What about the 2 or 3 years before that?
I used to kid that if I were a quarterback playing against the Cowboys, I would throw the ball to whoever #31 was covering.
His confidence was shot playing in Dallas.
If only someone shot Roy instead of Keith Davis...
maybe we would have done a bit better. Hell, we should have traded down as far as we could have and taken Ed Reed.
Shooting for the 3 seed...
I think anyway, can’t see Minn or NO losing 3 or more…I would take a 3 seed in a heartbeat!
i only need NO to lose 1 more. their other 5 dont matter at all
Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.
Thank you for setting the record straight on Romo, particularly for pointing out
how few his weapons were last season and how poor his protection was. Yes, he has the occasional stinker, but he’s hardly the only one, and, as a fan, it’s been galling to me to watch the media and a whole lot of fans let other culprits off the hook just because it’s easier to focus blame one person and turn him into a convenient scapegoat. As you pointed out, doing that is just lazy. My greatest hope is that this season, the D and the O line keep working to improve and help out the guy who has taken so much heat for them in the past.
Most excellent write up.
Speaking of the D-line
I think it is the most underrated in football. Those boys are playing tough and physical. One of the best in the league IMO.
Should be.
He’s been getting a lot of mentions from announcers during our games this year. He should make the Pro Bowl again without a problem, I’d think.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I also think Marcus Spears is playing well this year too.
He was solid last year and is probably playing even better this year. He’s not Richard Seymour as we’d all hoped but he’s no bust either.
He’s started nearly every game since he’s been drafted. He’s strong against the run. He’s seems a good locker room guy. He’s also still only 26 and I wouldn’t mind at all if we could resign him for a reasonable contract (Olshansky size but realistically probably a bit more). Having Ratliff (28), Olshansky (27) and Spears (26) all locked up guarantees us three solid to great Dlineman in their prime for our front 3 for the next 4-5 years. I wouldn’t mind if they kept Bowen (he always seems to be effective filling in and he’s only 25) either.
If we can resign him for Olshansky money...
I think we should keep him, but if he’s looking for Canty money, it’s time to let him go.
I wouldn't call it lazy.
I would say they went with the most likely solution. Romo clearly has a much lower rating due to lower completion percentage and more turnovers in December. We can apportion the blame in many different ways, but he deserves a good deal of it.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:49 PM CST up reply actions
The mindless "it's all Romo's fault" stuff I see here and in the media nearly every
day? Lazy as hell.
+1
its interesting that he mentioned the lower completion percentage…
if the defense had played well in those games (e.g. allowed fewer than 33 points), romo wouldnt have had to attempt as many passes. we’d be running in low scoring game.
That means fewer attempts, which means fewer incompletions and fewer defenses knowing we have to pass
I think you can call it lazy
when pundits omit all the other culprits. Romo deserves a share of the blame, but if you want to call yourself a “sport analyst” or “sports journalist” you ought to be able to recognize and discuss key elements – injuries, personnel gaps, other poor performances, etc. If you don’t then you are guilty of being a “sports tabloid writer”.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
More like sensationalism
There’s nothing buzz worthy about analyzing a team and giving the reason they don’t play well.
But if you find a face to go with your scapegoat AND some tabloid type stuff like Jessica Simpson, and a trip to Mexico, then boy oh boy you got a story that wil be contagious.
very true
that’s what my problem with the whole Jessica/Mexico thing in the first place. Not that it affects your game, but it gives the appearance of a distraction. BTW, I find it very interesting that I was taking up for VY before and a lot on here were saying he was terrible, draft bust, etc. Now look at the guy. He did wonderful yesterday. Goes to show that fans/media don’t know a whole lot about guys do they?
jury is still out on Young IMO
I have to see him sustain this kind of play into next year before I’ll admit I was wrong. If he does, I’ll admit it then.
In Romo we Trust
Oh, I'm not saying that he's of Superstar Quality......
but some people were saying some pretty nasty things about him. I’m happy for the guy because I have met him. He always had everything come easy, athletic wise. It’s good to see when he has faced some adversity, that he “seems” to be putting it together. He sure outplayed “pretty boy” Leinert yesterday didn’t he? A lot of people may not know that he came from a single mother household. His dad didn’t even talk to him (he was in prison) until VY became popular with the Horns.
I watched him play all his years at Texas
He matured a lot as a college passer. I felt that he should have stayed another year.
That being said, I always felt he had the ability to develope into a NFL caliber QB.
I'm glad he left when he did......
look at Sam Bradford. If he had left last year, he probably would have been the first pick instead of Stafford. Now, after the injury, his stock could be seriously hurt. Some say he’s lost millions.
If he played both ways...
and also played Safety… sure, heap on the blame, but it’s myopic and ignorant to assert it is all Romo’s fault.
I posted a couple of comments regarding Romo on your site..
He is a very talented QB..they all have bad days, but do the math..the guy has ‘game’..The garbage that gets thrown his way is ridiculous and it seems every year the spinsters call him out unfairly..they point crap out like oh, he has a girfriend, oh he went to Mexico, oh he went to Las Vegas..blah blah blah…I say big deal, who cares what he does with his time off? and what in God’s name does that have to do with his play on the field?..The last time I counted (correct me if I am wrong) is there are 11 guys on offense, 11 guys on defense and 11 guys on special teams..All three of those units need to be firing on all eight cylinders to win..The crap that he takes is just unfair..I’m a Giants fan, but I’ll tell you the one thing I admire most about him is he never, ever let’s that non-sensical bull get the best of him..His glory day will come.
brilliant
I’ve been waiting for this post all year. BTB always shines the light on the lack of depth on the media’s behalf when looking for the easy storyline. The team’s December struggles are well noted. Romo is always the scapegoat.
All 5 of our games are going to be very tough, including the Redskins. If we are to have a legitimate shot of winning the SuperBowl this year, we must prove that we are capable of beating good teams.
With an over view, nothing less than 3-2 is acceptable if you want to go into the playoffs as anything but a ‘they could get lucky team’.
With a finer tooth comb, victories over 2 of 3 among SD, NO and Philly cements this team as true contenders.
Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.
Yep...
3-2 is my prediction as well.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Nov 29, 2009 7:26 PM CST up reply actions
We definitely have to take advantage of the Giants next week...
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-giants-manninginjury&prov=ap&type=lgns
and it seems we might be facing David Carr….if we loose to him might as well give up on the season.
Plantar fasciitis hurts
really hurts. I had a very mild case of it last month and getting up in the morning took some effort. It has to affect you if you play NFL QB.
it says it's plantar fasciitis and also a stress reaction
whatever the hell that is……but I I wouldn’t mind at all if they dont have eli for that game.
I know a stress reaction
Can turn in to a stress fracture.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Eli is playing next week.
Hopefully we can get to him and end his season taking the decision out of the Giant’s hands.
No, Eli is going to play..
The Plantar Fasciitis has healed, now he is being treated for a subsequent Stress Reaction..He insists his foot feels fine and it is not bothering him, so he’ll be starting..If we don’t beat you guys and Philly, they’ll probably take a look around the league and evaluate whether the season is washed up from a wild card persective..then I suspect they’ll pull him and get him ready for next year..It wouldn’t make sense to run the risk of a fracture…that means the only teams that will potentially face David Carr is Washington, Carolina and the Vikings.
that Atlanta-Philly game next week is huge
The Falcons are likely cooked if they drop it at home, with 6 losses. Philly gets the 5th loss if they drop it.
Matt Ryan got hurt today
who knows if he’ll play. I don’t think redman can beat the eagles…….they barely made it against the bucs today
it's a completely different situation when you get a week to prepare
he had to play on the fly. Probably got 5% of the reps this past week.
ATL also lost Turner,
dont know his injury, but if your starting QB and RB are out, it becomes a rather tall order to win even against Eagles. Moreover, I dont know for the life of me why is ATL considered a good team to begin with.
Dallas will know by gametime
Iggles play early. Dallas plays at 4 EST, with Troy and Joe calling the game (go figure).
If Ryan can go they have a shot
Especially if Nerwood is healthy. Snelling and Nerwood can get it done.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
If only washington would've won today.....but pigs are pigs
cant count on them for crap…..
I know, go figure
for once I root for the Skins and what do they do? THEY LET ’EM OFF THE HOOK!!!!!!!!!!1
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
that was a bad call at the end though......
first, Campbell should have just run for the first down and then the refs should have called a roughing the passer penalty. At least, the Giants lost on Thurs.
It was terrible
There was also a phantom PI that was inexplicable. Officiating has been poor this year to say the least.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
You can't predict what Philly is going to do.
After they pulled McNabb, they only put him back in because their next game was a Thursday game. If it was a Sunday game, Kolb would have started, and they wouldn’t have gotten to the NFC championship game, and chances are the Cowboys might have been in the playoffs.
But… they are talented and even when they aren’t, they still can win. I’m never going to count them out until they are officially out of the running.
they're at home
Mike Smith has lost one home game in his two years in Atlanta.
Dallas is at New York.
Minnesota goes to Arizona,
The Packers and Ravens play. both teams will have wild card seeds in hand if the
Ravens beat the Steelers tonight.
Vince Young goes to Indy.
Some juicy, juicy games next week.
Ideal scenario we beat NY, Atl beats Philly and then NY beats Philly the next week..
too much to ask?
very nice analysis Raf as usual
I agree the defense needs to step up and continue playing well down the stretch.
Also, I disagree that night in Pittsburgh was cold….it was freakin frigid! The coldest I’ve ever been watching a game.
In Romo we Trust
Mister,
Romo grew up in Wisconsin. No excuse.
I never said it was an excuse
I agree Romo should be used to the cold, I was just saying that night was beyond cold because I was there.
Rarely is Romo mainly repsonsible for our losses but I admit that was one of them.
In Romo we Trust
well, it's a myth
that I think Romo is flawless, it just appears that way since I’m always defending him from all the haters.
In Romo we Trust
Rafael is a hater?
No need to reply. Just sort of underscoring the built-in insanity of your tired act… the provider of the best blend of Cowboys football analysis and entertainment actually hates Romo because he can comment on him without the same level of hysterical adoration that guides your every waking thought.
he can comment on him without the same level of hysterical adoration that guides your every waking thought.
Didn’t Terry just make the same comment..that it WAS Romo’s fault in the Pittsburgh game?
the built-in insanity of your tired act
He’s a Romo supporter when Tony is getting unreasonably bashed…to the point that occasionally he defends the QB when he probably shouldn’t but never against a well made argument.
The Romo-Haters created Terry’s fervent defense of the man…not Terry.
Can someone please define hater for me?
I see it so often on this board in response to any criticism of the team or players. I thought a hater was someone that dislikes or hates a player for no reason. However, on this board, it seems to mean anyone that ever says anything at all negative about something, whether they provide reasoning or not. I’m older than 14, so maybe I’m not understanding the nuances.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 30, 2009 8:25 AM CST up reply actions
the term hater doesn't really have an objective definition
My definition may be different from others but to me a hater is somebody who constantly criticizes a player without merit or justification and does it because he either doesn’t like him personally or as a player.
To me, criticizing a player after a bad performance isn’t a hater, however, doing over and over no matter how he performs constitutes a hater and there are plenty of fans on this blog that do that in regards to Romo.
Just for the record, I don’t consider you to be a hater of Romo.
In Romo we Trust
+1
I have the same definition.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Terry
If Terry has attacked Rafael for being tough on Romo, I missed it.
seriously, what are you talking about?
what in the world is going on when someone that feels a quarterback with the OUTSTANDING win/loss record that Romo has is ridiculed more than the people who think all things bad are that QB’s fault?
loopy.
Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.
Joey, you're clueless
I never said Raf is a hater, actually I think he’s the best writer on the blog and look forward to his articles more than any others and thats saying a lot because I have high opinions of Grizz and Aaron as well.
You more than anyone should know who I consider haters and Raf is no where close to that.
In Romo we Trust
You really don't need to defend yourself, Terry.
Don’t lower yourself to their level. We all love Raf, and we know you respect his opinions. I’ve gotten caught up in these traps too. IMO, a hater is one who attacks fans. We have an opinion, which may or may not be relevant, and all the sudden we’re haters, idiots, morons blah blah blah. The worst part of enjoying a site like this is you DO have to deal with some characters who never seem to be happy no matter what. Rest assured, the good guys know what’s really going on.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
Farve grew up in Mississippi.
Who would have predicted he would have done well in Green Bay.
Brett Favre
Could play well in the Antartic.
The O
Their performance the past 3 games has me a bit concerned. I was only able to see the Green Bay and Oakland games. Now, Oakland’s D isn’t that tough and one thing that I didn’t like was what Phil Simms had pointed out during the game: the offense seems to get a big play and then get a penalty.
Hopefully this team develops a killer instinct soon. They had a great opportunity to shut the door on the Raiders in the 3rd. Instead, I believe our O sputtered after a huge Witten gain and Oakland scored on their subsequent drive.
But oh well, we’ll see.
Nice writeup, Raf!
yes the O is worrysome and somewhat unpredictable, but
we might not have a HC, instead we are carrying one of the best DC in the league and this will make all the difference this year.
and a very average OC
But back to oakland you can’t really say they’re bad, I mean they beat cincy, and philly and I don’t remember if they won against SD but they played tough so its not like they are cleveland. They have some talent…
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
by hashishkabob on Nov 30, 2009 6:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I think your players may simply have been overlooking..that's a bad habit
Our guys did it with Denver..and got killed.
I don't think NYG will be
easy, but if Dallas plays their B+ game they will win.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
The scariest thing about the NYG is this is a survial game for them
It sucks to be playing a team who needs a win as bad as they do. Get ahead of them early and they may quit.
by StillHateTheGiants on Nov 29, 2009 8:06 PM CST up reply actions
Dallas is better than NYG
right now. If they don’t lay an egg they should beat the Giants
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
Fe Fi Fo Fum
Bring on Big Blue…lets have some fun.
but its a survival game for us too,
they are the easiest game of the remaining 5 (except maybe WAS, but who knows), and we should play for revenge aswell. Early lead will make them one dimentional and than we can unleash the pass rush
That is very true..
Again I’ll reference our game against Denver..We faced the same thing, now we are in that boat.
The defensive backfield and the offensive line have been awful in December's past.
I think One.cool.customer posted a statistic noting that Romo has been one of the most blitzed quarterbacks in the NFL this season. Oddly, his rating is only a couple of points lower when blitzed, than when he is not blitzed.
I believe that this is an indictment on the offenive line. A-gap blitzes, delayed corner blitzes, and other stunts have resulted in countless sacks, pressures, and hits on Tony this season. The Steelers and Ravens were both successful with this tactic last December, and this is a copy-cat league.
If the offensive linemen can hold the line long enough for Romo to deliver several long touchdown passes, teams will tone down the blitzes. If the offensive line can continue to open holes in the running game, and Felix can hit a dew more long runs, teams will stop blitzing altogether.
The defensive secondary has played much better against quality opponents: Atlanta, Green Bay, and Philadelphia. The run defense, however, is still surrendering 4.2 yards per carry (3.98 when the Tampa Bay game is eliminated). The Giants may not be the running juggernaut that they were the past two seasons, but any success on the ground will open up the passing game.
I highly doubt that Wade’s 3-5-3 defensive set will help the Cowboys this coming Sunday. The game in Washington will also test the Dallas rush defense: cold weather, coupled with a team that struggles to pass downfield. San Diego has rediscovered its running game and New Orleans seems to be able to do whatever it wishes offensively.
All of that glosses over the fact that the Cowboys have fewer takeaways than turnovers, and that Dallas is among the league leaders in penalties. I would like to see the Cowboys step up their game and reduce the penalties as well as produce more takeaways. Recent history suggests, however, that this is what the Cowboys are.
the best counter for blitzes are
quck slants, which are not TR best throws and RW best catches and
screens at which we have mixed success. If we can rectify those two the O will be purring along
romo threw a slant to austin that looked perfect.....and if those are not their best throws well practice them....
they sure as hell help beat the blitz
the 3-5-3 is a prevent
everybody runs it — in prevent situations.
hmm. i hadnt noticed that before… i would have thought you’d want more than 3 dbs on your prevent though.
The 3-3-5
has 5 DBs
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 30, 2009 1:28 AM CST up reply actions
Wow
My bad on that one… totally read it wrong. That’s what I get for reading late at night.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 30, 2009 8:17 AM CST up reply actions
Aren't most QBs' ratings HIGHER when they are blitzed?
Granted, they probably take more sacks and get off fewer passes, but that doesn’t factor into QB ratings.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
True
Most QB’s have higher ratings when blitzed.
It’s basically a numbers game:
Anytime you blitz, you’re bringing more people to the line of scrimmage and you have fewer people behind them. Now if the blitzers aren’t able to stop or at least disrupt the play, you’ve got fewer people in the backfield to cover the opponent, more space to defend and that could potentially lead to bigger plays.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 30, 2009 9:06 AM CST up reply actions
im not sure if i agree...that would mean then you would'nt be able
To throw against a prevent D, but we see teams move the ball easily against it…I would think pressuring the QB would lower his % overall. Otherwise why do it..
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
by hashishkabob on Nov 30, 2009 6:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
of the Top 15 QBs by passer rating
only four have a passer rating when blitzed that is below their total passer rating – Favre (111.0 vs. 112.1), Rivers (91.0 vs. 101.6), McNabb (88.3 vs. 94.0) and Romo (90.0 vs. 93.9) – and only Rivers number has a strong dropoff.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 1, 2009 6:17 AM CST up reply actions
The concern you guys have here in December..
Is the teams you are scheduled to face..There are no pushovers on it.
Sometimes I think it's a shame When I get feelin' better when I'm feelin' no pain.
Great write-up Raf. It gives eyesight to the blind (myself) when you give me the breakdown like that. I feel even a little more hopeful than I did before I read your piece and that’s saying something, due to the fact I had already convinced myself this team would do better than previous versions. Kudos!
As Romo goes, the Cowboys go. Including the defense.
The only problem with this article are Romo’s numbers over those games and Raf’s previous article on ‘Dirty Points’ explaining how the offense and special teams’ poor play and turnovers contributed to the defense’s ppg numbers. Which article are we supposed to believe?
2008 – Romo had 9 turnovers in 3 losses, 0 in the win.
2007 – Ignoring the WAS game, Romo had 3 turnovers in 1 loss, 1 in 2 wins.
2006 – Romo had 7 turnovers in 3 losses, 3 in 2 wins.
The Cowboys lost every game where he had at least 2 turnovers except the Giants game in 2006. I’m not trying to say that the defense doesn’t deserve their share of the blame, but that Romo is equally, if not moreso, responsible.
In 2008, the “defense” gave up 32 points per game in the losses, including 7 per game when they weren’t even on the field, and 9 more per game on drives that started in Dallas territory.
I’m not sure how a stinker is defined, but Romo’s QB rating in the 3 December losses last year were 44.9, 66.2, and 55.8. Those all qualify as stinkers in my book. This whole team needs to play better in December, but Romo is the main culprit, in my opinion.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:25 PM CST reply actions
Romo in the past was always trying to do too much
since the defense wasn’t very good. I think this year he has a lot more confidence in the defense and as a result he won’t try to force things when they’re not there.
In Romo we Trust
Oh, is that what it was?
I should have known that it was somehow still because of everyone else.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:42 PM CST up reply actions
Is he not on the team?
One guy choosing not to trust his teammates, particularly when that guy plays the most important role on the team, is a major problem. It’s just funny how you try to make it sound like the rest of the team forced him into making bad decisions.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:53 PM CST up reply actions
That was Terry's claim, not mine.
I think he just made bad decisions, but Terry said it was because he didn’t have confidence in his teammates.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions
those are the ones that drive me the most nuts.
bad decisions. the long throw against NY that got picked was wrenching.
but,
he puts you in a position to win almost every game. gotta take the good with the bad.
To an extent.
You have the bad with the good so long as the good outweighs the bad. For whatever reason, that hasn’t been the case late in the season. I like what I have seen this year, though, and think this will be the one that swings it back in his favor. Of course, I thought that the last 2 years, too.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:01 PM CST up reply actions
ask yourself this
how would you feel going in to this week if romo got hurt on t-giving?
Not good, but hopeful.
Right now, I feel good but anxious. I said that I think this is finally his year. However, I have to temper that enthusiasm, because he has been playing well going into December the past 3 years. That’s nothing new. Every year, the Cowboys are on a roll going into December, Romo is playing well, and things look good. Thus far, it hasn’t worked out.
Even though his rating is actually a little lower this year than the last couple of years, I feel like he has been playing better and smarter, as he is protecting the football and not making as many costly bad decisions, even in wins. I think that bodes well down the stretch.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:08 PM CST up reply actions
He has shown more growth this year than the past 3 years.
In my opinion, anyway. And that’s combined.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:10 PM CST up reply actions
thats exactly what I'm saying
Romo trying to do too much and therbey making bad decisions are the result of him feeling he has to because the defense wasn’t stopping the opposing team enough to win.
This year is different in that regard
In Romo we Trust
He told you that?
When the offense is scoring TDs for the other team and giving them the ball on our side of the field, that is not a strong argument. As a leader, he has to demonstrate confidence in his team, not take it on himself to win every game. Didn’t you see Teen Wolf?
And for whatever reason, his game has dropped off in December over the past 3 years. That’s undeniable. It can be spun in many different ways, but his numbers pre-December are vastly superior than they are after December. What happens in that month that he suddenly loses faith in his defense?
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:05 PM CST up reply actions
the entire team's game has dropped off in Dec
and that included the defense. The December blues are the result of the entire team playing poorly, not just Romo.
In Romo we Trust
I have NEVER said otherwise.
However, in my humble opinion, Romo’s play has dropped off the most, and has affected the team the most. I know it’s a team game and all that, but the quarterback position affects the game more than any other position.
And as I have said the past 2 years, it’s now up to him to change his legacy. All he has to do is not play poorly and it will end all the “December” chatter, no matter if you feel it’s warranted or not.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:32 PM CST up reply actions
That's the thing
In your opinion, Romo’s level of play has dropped the most.
The OLine level of play went to Hell.
There were a lot of injuries to key players.
The Defense started to appear on milk cartons.
But Romo’s level of play is the one that draws most of the attention… Is that because all that he does is tangible and some of the thing that his teammates are doing wrong are intangibles?
Pressures allowed, run blocking, failed blitz pickups, passes allowed, faulty tackling, coaching, etc.
You still want to say that Romo’s level of play was the most important factor? Go ahead! But you should know that there are those that don’t like scapegoats…
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
I don't think those things changed in December.
The OLine played that way all year, not just in December. Look at their numbers when Romo wasn’t the starter last year. Additionally, Romo was under assault in the Giants game and played extremely well. It’s one thing to be under pressure and another to turn the ball over because of it. I think Romo has shown extreme improvement in that area this year, and if he continues to play like he has, that will be the main reason for Dallas succeeding for the rest of the season and in the playoffs compared to previous years.
Dallas had injuries all year, and that’s just part of the game. They were arguably as healthy in December as they were in any month. Whether the coaching staff unwisely chose to rely on injured players rather than capable backups is another discussion.
I respectfully disagree about the Defense. They allowed 20 to Pittsburgh including a pick six from Romo, and 8 to the Giants. They were forced to continually take the field in poor field position due to turnovers, special teams, and 3 and outs. They certainly could have been more stout, but they were not the primary reason for Dallas’ losses, in my opinion.
If someone is primarily responsible for something, how are they a scapegoat? You may not agree with me, but I think that I have provided reasoning for my opinion and am not just irrationally picking someone to blame for no reason. Are you saying that Romo has not played poorly and turned the ball over? Do you not think that QB play, good or bad, is a significant factor in wins and losses?
I think that the evidence clearly shows that Romo’s turnovers have been the most important factor in losses. If nothing else, they are at least equally responsible as any other factor. If any other player had 2.7 turnovers per game in those losses, say Barber or TO, I believe they would be justly lambasted as the main reason for the loss.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 30, 2009 8:08 AM CST up reply actions
I agree with a lot of what you say
but the one thing I would argue that is that while the o-line may have been less than stellar the whole year, that hardly exonerates them from a good chunk of blame. Plus, considering the defenses we played down that stretch I think their woes were exacerbated and became even more apparent down the stretch. As such, it can’t be terribly surprising that Romo’s play dropped off in December.
Please don’t misunderstand, I am not saying that Romo is free of blame or should be fully exonerated for his play last year. He clearly had a very bad Pittsburgh game and did not play up to his standard of play that we are used to seeing. I am simply saying that to some extent that outcome shouldn’t be that surprising considering who was protecting him and who we were playing (aka teams with great pass rushes).
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 30, 2009 8:24 AM CST up reply actions
I understand your points.
And I also want to say, please don’t misunderstand, I’m not absolving the rest of the team from blame either.
It all really comes down to how much blame gets distributed where, I suppose.
Hopefully this is the last year we’ll have to worry about it, because Romo, the defense, the OLine, the coaching staff, and everyone else will put it to bed.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 30, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions
As I said, tangibles and intangibles
You can look at everything that Romo does and there are stats for everything.
We can also look at the OLine level of play and find stats, but most from most of the things you won’t. For example, in December Romo was sacked 13 times, the rest of the year? 7. Isn’t that a sign of a level of play drop off? What about pressures? Intangible, but considering the increased number of sacks, it’s fairly easy to guess that it went up. Run blocking? Blitz pickup? Intangibles, but OLine wasn’t playing well, so it’s easy to guess.
The Defense still allowed points like a bellow average Defense. Considering the money that was invested, the results were lame.
Have I said that Romo isn’t responsible? Not even Terry has said such a thing… He’s part of the problems that the team has shown at the worst possible times and the problems have been many.
As an example, would you say that Aikman was to blame due to all the problems that the Cowboys had between 1996 and 1998 to win games late in the year and in the playoffs (in 3 playoffs games Aikman threw 2TDs and 7 Ints)? Or was Aikman one of the factors, that included eroding depth and average level of play in a lot of positions?
It’s easy to blame and point the finger at the QB, but Football has a lot to do with the other positions, too.
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
Very intelligent argument.
Please tell me where I said that. Then, if you’re able, provide some facts or even theories that counter anything that I’ve said.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions
Oh, you're mad because I disagreed with Terry. I get it.
I didn’t recognize that you were his guard dog. I’m sure the guy prefers to fight his own battles, though. Let me know when you want to talk Cowboys, otherwise, have a great night.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:18 PM CST up reply actions
Nah, you just got the same snotty attitude you dished out when
someone disagreed with you. The fact that it was Terry is beside the point. It would have been refreshing if you had actually answered his perfectly legitimate response with football talk instead of smarting off in the same old kneejerk manner.
Romo was last year
He was awful in the Pitt game. Awful.
He was pretty bad for a half in the ravens game. He had a great 4th quarter though.
Everyone top to bottom stunk in the Eagles game. The Eagles had 17 points before Romo’s INT on the attempt to roy. THey had 24 points at halftime, and there was only one Romo turnover. Our receivers were shut down that whole half too – whenever he threw the ball, there was very little open. To say Romo was the “main culprit” in this game is a pretty bi exaggeration imo.
Aside from that…he flat out stunk in the Philly game in 07, but keep in mind he hurt his thumb that game. He was obviously not his accurate self, you don’t need to look at the turnovers to see that. He missed wide open receivers all day.
Aside from that, in 06 the Eagles and Saints again owned our wr core. TO was shut down by some noname on the saints and joselio hanson on philly. Romo really had nowhere to go and the defense did him few favors that december.
It really was only 08 that Romo was the “main culprit”.
As usual when we disagree, we don't actually differ by much.
It seems like you and I are usually just a few degrees off from each other. I consider Romo the main culprit because of the importance of his position and the clear drop in his level of play. I’m not saying that he’s the only culprit by any means. I think a lot of it depends on how much a part of the offense you consider quarterback play.
In that Eagles game, it was more the whole offense than just Romo, but he is the leader of the offense. They went 3 and out on 4 of their first 5 drives, then an interception, then Pacman fumbled a kickoff. Boom, 27-3. The defense didn’t respond to the challenge well, but it’s not like the offense was without blame either.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 29, 2009 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
if we had peyton or brady
would our receivers be any more open in those games? you can’t blame romo for the whole offense.
when the offensive line lets a guy through the middle untouched and romo gets sacked, thats romos fault?
or how about when romo hands off to barber and he gets stuffed at the line, thats romos fault too huh? just because hes the leader of offense?
ridiculous.
well
Its my humble opinion that the truly HOF great qbs (Brady, Manning) do look their wrs look much better than they are by getting them the ball in perfect position when they have the slightest separation. But Romo isn’t there and I’m not going to discount him for it, hes still a very good qb at what he does.
But I agree with you on the other points – when the OL is getting the qb killed and the wrs aren’t gettin good separation, that shows up a lot in Romo’s numbers but not theirs, and he gets too much blame.
One possible situation is that we see that the defense takes the reins for this team, as they have done the last 2 months, and Romo doesn’t need t force the ball to keep up with the opposition. Does this make him a better qb than in years past? I don’t know.
I imagine that a QB like Manning
would, in response to the blitzes and o-line breakdowns, change the play-calling to adjust to what the defense is doing.
If we had Manning or Brady...
Obviously this is a game where neither of us can be right or wrong, because who knows? But here’s my opinions:
Yes, they would be more open in relation to the quarterback throwing it to them. Peyton’s completion percentage numbers speak for themselves. The increased success of receivers arriving in NE and decreased success of those leaving shows the effect of having Brady throwing to them, in my opinion. When Romo is on, he’s as sharp as either of these 2, but he has not been as consistent as them.
While it’s not Romo’s fault entirely, he has to share some of the responsibility for reading and recognizing the defense and helping to set protections. If 8 guys are coming and 6 guys are blocking, he needs to realize that and adjust. And he can’t just let the ball fly or not be prepared to hold onto the ball should a rusher get through. He has done a much better job of that this year, and that is the crux of my argument that his play will be chiefly responsible for the team’s success this year. If he continues to do what he has been doing, I think they win at least 3 of the remaining 5.
Obviously it’s not Romo’s fault if a running play gets stuffed and the defense did not show that they were in an alignment that would likely stuff it. I can’t recall ever saying or implying that, and if I did, I was mistaken. For the record, Dallas averaged over 4.2 yards per carry in their December losses last year.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 30, 2009 7:37 AM CST up reply actions
Raf's Write up
Was a sequential look at some big plays that hurt us tremendously by the defense and ST.
This article was about the improvement of those units and how that will be the difference in this years team.
Romo is still the same..so why compare what he did before to what he might do now? With him he is the same guy playing the same position. So using his dramatic turn around as a focal point would have made little sense. He is playing better..but even if he doesn’t…he plays well enough that a much improved defense and special teams contribution could result in a successful december.
Another point.. using turnovers as a chopping block and claiming that each turnover as equally as devastating is obtuse. Some of those turnovers were not romo’s fault and some of them were..holding him accountable for all of them or saying that they were all equally important over a three year span is short sighted.
In the instance of the 2008 Pittsburgh Philly, and 07 Philly this argument makes perfect sense. Romo was risky and gave up defensive touchdowns and massive turnovers that cost the team the game…. as was mentioned in Raf’s article.
I only used the ones where he fumbled or was intercepted.
I didn’t credit other players’ fumbles to him. If he was the last one in possession of the ball from our team, he is at least partially responsible for the turnover.
Given that Romo has averaged 2.7 turnovers per game in December losses vs. 1 per game in December wins, I have to respectfully disagree that looking at turnovers is short sighted or obtuse. I think it has been proven time and again that turnovers are one of the most important factors in any game. Even looking at this year, Dallas has lost all 3 games where Romo had 2 or more turnovers and has not lost any where he had less.
My point was that while I agree that the defense and special teams have improved, that won’t matter if Romo is still the same. Raf argues that the Defense is primarily responsible for Dallas losing several December games, and I disagreed. I believe that Tony Romo turning the ball over is primarily responsible.
One of his points was that the Defense gave up 32 ppg in our December 2008 losses, which I think is skewed based on Raf’s own analysis from earlier this year, as 7 points per game were scored against the offense, and another 9 per game came from drives that began in Dallas territory. Could the defense have been more stout? Absolutely, but that’s still 16 points per game that I feel are on the offense. If that happens again this year, I’m certain that they will have a losing December/January again.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 30, 2009 12:36 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah, Sean Taylor definitely returned it.
That Redskins game and the Mark Brunnell to Santana Moss game were two of the most unbelievable losses I’ve ever experienced. I just sat there staring at the screen, thinking, “No, the game was over. We had won. This must be a mistake.” Similar to the Seattle playoff loss in that way.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
This is the perfect December
Great Read!
Really a good look at the “phenomenon” that has become the Dallas Cowboys in the month of December.
As I see it.. this is the best schedule possible to see if the Cowboys can break their dreaded December slump. If this team goes out and wins 3 or 4 out of 5 games..then we will know that they’re the real deal.
If it were a bunch of cupcakes at the end of the season then in the playoffs the questions would still be raised. The headlines about being still unproven would radiate and It would be the biggest “ya, but” about the Boys leading into the playoffs. But, If they can really compete and beat some of these good teams in the month of December then I think the questions about winning big games late in the year would at least be addressed enough to have some good momentum and confidence going into the playoffs.
Here’s to a great december
good sunday night game
too bad pitt cant tackle.
good ole billy cundiff
barely hit from 24 to make it a tie.
Good write up, Many of us have known that Romo hasn't been the problem
It’s always been wades defense, esp. the secondary. Last years main problem was safety and a miss evaluation of Anthony Henry/Terrence Newmans talent. Newman, with the emergence of Mike Jenkins has been shown to be what he always has been. A good decent corner, not anything special, and not a star, shut down corner. A. Henry was a liabity last year. He was traded to Detroit, and (although it seemed to shock some) isn’t even starting……… in detroit (ouch).
I think we have safety issues still, but the corner play is much better with Jenkins starting and Scantrick in the Nickel. Sensabaugh has been good. Seems we have a much better defense this year, and with brooking, no one is going to quit or there might be physical violence.
ha!
screw the ravens along with the steelers. and screw the ravens HC. He was quoted recently saying the cowboys are everything that is wrong in the NFL.
"Dallas has not topped 10 points in its three games against scoring defenses ranked in the top 10."
Hugely worrisome. The offense will have to be able to put up at least a decent point total against a top defense at some point.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
you don't see many NFC defenses in the top 10
Washington is there;
so is Denver.
Green Bay is the team. It will be interesting to see what happens if Dallas
hosts them in a playoff game.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 29, 2009 11:53 PM CST up reply actions
I hope we do
Honestly, I felt like we left soo many big plays on the field that game which changed the game. I want another shot.
me too
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
Capers was reading Red Balls mail last time
Would he do it again?
Winning in Green Bay is hard when they have a BAD defense.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
also, last season
there was a drop off in defensive production because of the punter’s injury.
it’s not sexy, it’s not terribly quantifiable, but I have to believe the short punts and resulting short fields had a role to play in the declining quality of play last season.
I don’t believe in any December Curse. That sort of thing is a myth, unless there is a continued conditioning or injury situation that is due to something the Cowboys continue to do wrong as an organization.
The teams and coaches and stadiums and opponents and plays are DIFFERENT every year, and so different as to not be comparable. There are no repeat culprits for the winter blahs… it’s always a combination of different variables. Rafael “proves” it with his top level analysis above.
However, I COULD buy-into a theory that continued failure has to do with choking/lack of confidence of players who staff the difference-making positions, like Romo or Newman or WR or kicker.
I do think Romo was tight and choked in those games that were lost due to him, but I don’t think at this stage of his career that there’s enough evidence to suggest that that is his defining characteristic. Those instances are anomolies.
I've got to think that part of our defense's big improvement in PPG is due to fewer TOs by the offense
Last year, the defense did okay in terms of yardage but gave up a disproportionate amount of points due to short fields given to opponents by Dallas turnovers, including Romo INTs. This year, our TOs are down, especially if you consider that 5 of them happened in one game (Week 2 NYG).
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
I wonder if Romo's December problems are not so much a problem with the calendar...
…and more a problem with the Eagles, particularly the season’s 2nd game against the Eagles. As Raf notes, 2 of Romo’s 3 December stinkers are against the Eagles, and I’d throw the 44-6 loss in there as well and make it 3 out of 4 (although that was clearly a team loss, Tony didn’t play well either).
So it seems logical that part of the December issue is an Eagles problem, and not an arbitrary aversion to a certain set of days on the calendar which stems from no logical cause. And I can’t really blame Romo or the Cowboys for that— Jim Johnson was a great DC, and playing well against him in the season’s second match-up, when he’s got one game under his belt against you already, seemed tremendously difficult.
Personally, I have always felt Andy Reid and Jim Johnson came up with their best game plans for the Cowboys, and in particular came out with brilliant stuff for the SECOND match-up in each season. Obviously JJ is gone, although his defense is still playing pretty well and Reid is still very much present.
So who knows if the trend continues this year, but if you look at the history laid out above by Raf, the Eagles seem to make up a large portion of this “December swoon,” at least as far as Tony Romo’s career is concerned. The Parcells Era stuff and the disasters in the secondary are another topic, but the offense’s chief nemesis seems to have been Philadelphia.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
definitely
the eagles game around christmas has been miserable for us for 3 years running now.
In our december struggles, they are the constant. Well, washington too, but its tough to take that 07 game into account.
Watched the re-aired 06 Seattle playoff loss recently
Not only was Roy Williams as bad as he ever was in that game, but Terry Glenn gave up a huge turnover in that game. Poor ball protection.
Last year basically what sticks out in my mind is Romo running for his life. I’m not convinced he was ever himself after the pinky break last year either.
We can go as far as we want as long as we stay healthy and don’t turn the ball over. Minimizing penalties certainly wouldn’t hurt.
Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"
I remember that Glenn play...
equally horrible was the call. A hitch to Terry Glenn on your own goal line? Really? The result was inevitable.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Perfect post heading into December Raf
Looking back (objectively) puts it in perspective.
“D” is for Defense, not December. If the defense keeps playing like they are, December (and beyond) will take care of itself.
D is also for No “Drama”. Remember the headlines and buzz this time last year? Jessica, TO, Crayton providing bulletin board fodder, Wade on the hotseat…everything BUT the important thing. Congrats to this team for not feeding the MSM monster and forcing Ed Werder to make his living somewhere other than in the Cowboys locker room.
And D is for “Destroy” which I’d love for us to do the the Giants season on Sunday.
Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"
i like your signature
have you seen the family guy episode (stewie kills lois i believe) when they’re in court and everyone yells “oh no” and the kool-aid guy jumps in with the “oh yea” and the judge goes, “everyone stop saying ‘oh no’ or the f**kin kool-aid guy is guna keep showin up.” lol classic
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Speaking of Nate.........
do you guys realize that’s Nate Newton’s son is a RB for UT? He had a pretty good game against the Aggies. Some reason, it’s hard to see Newton having a RB for a son. You would think his son would be an OL or DL. wouldn’t ya?
Maybe he was a problem child and had to run away from nate alot, so he went with RB, ;-)
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
funny........
he’s a pretty good athlete from what I have seen.
I heard Nate on the Mike Irvin radio show talking about his boy.
He said that Tray wanted to be a running back when he was a young kid like Emmit. Nate told him that he had to eat right and work hard or he would be a fat O-lineman like himself. Nate said that the boy from an early age really did it and never lost his focus. That says alot for his mindset and ability to keep his eye on the prize. He does remind me of Emmit as a RB.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
good stuff Wolf........
he must have his mom’s genes because he’s not big like his dad. He looks kinda small on the field-very much like Emmitt like you said
I still would like to see a few more "surprises" from Garrett…
I watched an interview with Belechik the other day about his upcoming game against the Saints. He said that if he were to take every formation that his team has or will see from the other 15 games they play on their schedule and combine them that it still wouldn’t match all the formations his team could see from the Saints in ONE GAME. I’d love it if people could say the same thing about the Cowboys.
Perhaps the Cowboys just don’t have the personnel to pull something like that off but just the same, I don’t want to look at my TV screen, on a 3rd and 2 situation see them in the shotgun and say aloud, "Please don’t run the half back draw from the shotgun here," only to see them do just that, (for no gain no less); if I can see it coming than so too can the opponent.
I always feel like an OC should come into each game with one play that the opponent does not have any film or tape on. Something new that no one has seen from them prior. The bubble screen to Olgetree against the Eagles is great example of this. Perhaps the Cowboys have been doing more of this than I realize but I feel as if I‘m rarely ever seeing any sort of new wrinkle in the playbook.
I’ve said all year that I think Garrett has been saving a few things for the stretch run; I hope he proves me right, starting with in the Meadowlands this weekend.
I know Raf has stated the Cowboys just aren’t built for long sustained drives and that they’re more of a fast-break team; if this is true than I fear we’re in for another December let down of sorts. The last thing the Cowboys want to do is get into a shootout with the likes of the Chargers and Saints. They’re going to need to help the defense by limiting the number of touches those offenses get. Nice long drives that eat lots of clock and end in the end zone are the best recipe for this. I realize this opens the door for more false start penalties but this team should never have to shy away from a sound strategy for fear of penalties.
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
To take the other side
If you have a team (especially an O-line) that can’t execute a more limited playbook without penalties and missed assignments, what would they do with more plays?? I think Jason’s imagination isn’t the problem. I think it’s the ability of some key players to absorb…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
there are two ways to do it
you can beat teams with scheme, the Jon Gruden, Sean Payton way, or you can try to beat them with talent and execution. That’s the Jimmy Johnson, Bill Parcells way. JJ’s guys were not complicated on offense or defense. they relied on athleticism and tight execution.
I see more scheme with the current guys, but not as much as you think. Garrett likes to go down the field, but that matches his talent. Austin and Witten can stretch a secondary. Felix Jones can make big runs.
When your o-line takes as many penalties as Dallas’ does, you go down the field.
In fact, Garrett played it your way, gee-roj, in ’07 and got crucified for it. The Cowboys stopped rotating Barber and Jones in the playoff game, went to heavy running, ground out a 20 play TD drive and what did it get them?
the defense gave up two fast break TDs to the Giants and people were grousing after the game that using Barber for four quarters took them away from what they did, and tired him out, etc., etc.
I don’t think Garrett will make that mistake again if they reach the playoffs this year.
by Rafael Vela on Nov 30, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
That drive you're referring to was brilliant...
I remember feeling great, thinking the Cowboys had that game in the bag when that long drive had ended. I was then astonished when the Giants marched right back down the field, and matched the Cowboys in JUST 48 SECONDS! That one was on the defense and I think it completely changed the complexion of that game. The Giants had the edge heading into the second half. If the Cowboys employed a similar strategy this year they would at least have 3 good backs they could do this with instead of wearing out just one.
The odd thing is the Cowboys are very good at "ball-control" offense when they have a 4th quarter lead; and it’s not just with running plays but short passes as well. Not sure why it couldn’t work for them earlier in the game if they’re facing someone like New Orleans who would be frustrated by such a long drive; Brees helplessly watching from the sidelines.
If Garrett’s preference remains to take a more aggressive, down-field approach I hope that at the very least Romo will be wise enough to take the underneath stuff if that’s all the defense is giving him. I hate it when the boys try and force it down the field. A dink and dunk drive can be just as effective (assuming its penalty free) and truly frustrate a defense.
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
Wow not a single player left
* LT — Torrin Tucker
* LG — Larry Allen
* C – Al Johnson
* RG — Marco Rivera
* RT – Rob Petitti
Andre Guroude was on this team but floundering at Guard. I always thought A. Gurude had ADD or something and needed to be more mentally engaged. Now he’s more successful at Center
Ware may be the most talented guy on defense....
……but Brooking is the Captain. In my opinion.
No doubt
Brooking is the straw that stirs the drink.
I'd say Brooking is the sugar
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Eventually Nick Folk
will cost us a game. and I have this eerie feeling it may be this week.
Texas Stadium has a hole in the roof so God can watch his favorite team play football.
He already has cost us a big 'un
Last year’s debacle began at Arizona where Folk’s FG would have changed the complexion of the game. And then you know what happened…
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 30, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
I thought we had FG kicker for many years to come in Folk.
Sure hope he snaps out of it and goes back to being Mr. automatic of yesteryear.
How bout dem Frogs!!!!
No doubt
That the Defense has to step up. The Giants game is winnable because I don’t think they are a very good team at the moment. Our DB’s must play better than they did in game 1. However, you must score points. Felix looks like he is healthy now which should help a lot. Don’t understand why we don’t run more screen plays with him. The Giants will be playing for everything next weekend. If we match the intensity then we win. Mark that down.
Romo's December QB ratings
While there is a lot of good insight in this article, it overlooks some key numbers. For instance, Tony Romo’s quarterback rating numbers in December:
2008 – 67.9 Comp % 56, TD 5 INT 6
2007 – 70.3 Comp % 60, TD 3 INT 5
2006 – 77.1 Comp % 60, TD 6 INT 8
This article is something of a whitewash over these facts. Romo’s only argument, against these numbers, which the article mentions, is that Romo was sacked at a much higher rate in the month of December, in particular, in 2006 and 2008.
So what you are esentially saying is
that things like playing catch-up, having to sustain longer drives, having poorer offensive line play, and having fewer weapons to run or throw to aren’t considerations on the numbers Romo produced? That QBs complete passes in a vacuum? Raf didn’t whitewash them he placed them in context. Since the position depends on a lot of moving parts to succeed, context is everything.
Where I fault Romo, and I think his words and actions back this view up, is for trying to do too much. Trying to make something out of a bad situation instead of occasionally taking a sack or throwing the ball away. But when your D is playing poorly, you have a porous offensive line and a very limited set of weapons, what are his options? Play safe and lose or try to make something happen and lose? This season, the defense is better, and he can afford to not press on a particular series, knowing they won’t give the game away. The Skins game is a great example. In years past, the defense might have given up a score. But now they can buckle down, and Romo didn’t go high risk until he knew he had one last series to win the game.
I know I’d prefer to go down swinging. But I don’t play FF, so maybe the stats just mean less to me…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I think that's the difference this year, for now at least
It seems like Romo actually trusts his defense to keep them in games when the offense isn’t operating well. Lately they have been making the stops that they weren’t making in the past, so there isn’t as much pressure (real or imagined) for him to put up points on every drive.
I have a hard time trusting the defense yet just because obviously they haven’t done it in December or January. I’m optimistic, yes, but at this point, I’m going to hold off putting my trust in them. I believe they can do it, but they have broken my heart before… lol
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
I can't believe it's December already
This season has gone by in a flash. It feels like hardly any time has passed since I was juiced up for the first game of the year.
Anyway… the 3 biggest concerns I see going into December are as follows (IMO)
1. Forcing turnovers. Dallas is 27th in the league with 7 interceptions and has a middle of the pack number of recovered fumbles (6). Giving Romo a short field can do a lot to take the pressure off of him and is a great counter to the top-notch offenses on the horizon.
2. Third down defense. Watching the Redskins/Eagles game was like deja vu when Campbell repeatedly converted third and longs. Obviously stopping teams on third down ends that chance of scoring but just as important to me is getting a stop on that first third down of the drive, which will keep field position in their favor (something they did not do against the Redskins, and as a result, had long field after long field on offense)
3. Third down offense. Just as important is first and second down ( obv lol) but 3rd and 4 and 3rd 10 are completely different. The defense has been good, but if the offense isn’t going to generate points, the least they could do is kill some clock, give the d some rest, and flip the field. I do think the offense will start putting up points again, but it would be nice to see them help out the defense for a change.
Along with one and two also go penalties which is an asterik category. Offensive penalties have killed drives. Defensive penalties have extended drives. Not much more really needs to be said there. You can’t blame one player because it’s coming from all over the place.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
those are definitely our weaknesses right now
Regarding #1, I’m not sure we’ll ever be a defense that creates a lot of TOs, hopefully we will someday, but I’m not holding my breath.
2 and 3 is where we need drastic improvement to beat the likes of the Saints and Vikings. Hopefully we’ll improve in those areas this month.
In Romo we Trust
thats true but
for instance the packers game.. Scandrick forces and recovers the fumble that was negated because of a penalty. A timely turnover can completely turn the momentum of the game and would have I think in that game. I’d say our best shot would be how the Redskins got a pick on Mcnabb yesterday.. the pass rush got a hand on him and forced a sky ball. Jenkins also has a nose for the ball. The defense always seems to be one play away from dominating a team, and i think TO’s would do that.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
I find it encouraging that the defense is that good in limiting opposing offenses points
and have done it with fewer TO than other teams. Dallas is not dependent on the TO to score or make stops. Now if the def can get over that hump then they will really start to dominate moreso than in the past.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Cue the magic ingredient "Field Position"
All hail King Joe D.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 30, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions

by 


















