Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Carmelo Anthony, Amar'e Stoudemire Vow To Fit In With Lin

Seven Statistical Nuggets To Stew Over

Random statistical thoughts and musings from a zen-like state of calm as I think only positive thoughts about December.

Star-divide

1. 'Tis the season to be jolly.

"The only way to approach next month is 'It’s in the past'. This is a different team, and I hope we are showing people just that. I really don’t give a damn about what happened 10 years ago. I like us right now." - Keith Brooking

No further stats required.

2. What's going on on third and long?

Through eleven games this season, Dallas has allowed a 36.6% 3rd-down conversion rate (53/145), and is ranked an okay-ish 12th in the NFL. But what's puzzling me is the nature of the conversions.

The eye-ball test suggests that we've allowed an overproportional amount of conversions on third and long. Let's look at the facts.

Opponent 3rd down conversions by down and distance, 2009


Short (1-3) Medium (4-6) Long (7-10) Very Long (11+)
Attempts
28 41 42 34
Conversions
18 16 11 8
in %
64% 39% 26% 24%

The conversion averages are about what you would expect and are fairly close to the NFL averages (see the graph below). From the numbers, the 3rd and (very) long conversions allowed don't appear to be a particularly big issue.

Probability_large

Graph courtesy of AdvancedNFLStats.com

So why do we all start holding our breath, muttering silent prayers or simply closing our eyes when our defense faces 3rd and very long? Here's why:

Opponent completion percentages by down and distance, 2009


Short
(1-3)
Medium
(4-6)
Long
(7-10)
Very Long
(11+)
Passes
15 36 35 27
Runs
13 2 3 5
Sacks
- - 3 4 2
Pass compl. % 73% 56% 54% 93%

In third and very long situations, opposing QB's have completed a mind-boggling 25 of 27 passes against us. Fortunately, only 7 of those passes resulted in conversions, which brings to mind the Madden 10 quote "How can you get the 1st down when you complete the pass short of the sticks? What are they thinking?".

In third and very long, our DBs are playing about a mile back in the hopes of keeping the play in front of them, and crucially, in front of the 1st down marker. In the meantime, our D-line is throwing everything but the kitchen sink at the OL, but not with much success. 

So the next time we're defending 3rd and very long, hold on tight to your beer, cause you'll need it: It is almost guaranteed that there will be another long completion - just pray that it's short of the sticks. Couple of other random observations:

  • In the 113 pass attempts in 3rd down situations, we've had only one interception (Sensabaugh vs. Philly).
  • Not included in the 53 of 145 completions: 6 Penalties resulting in 1st downs (1x very long, 1 x long, 2x medium, 2x short)
  • Total yards given up on 3rd downs: 935, or 6.4 YPA. I don't know whether this number is high or low relative to other teams, but consider that excluding 3rd downs, our defensive YPA is significantly lower at 4.9.
  • Not surprisingly, on 3rd and short, run/pass is evenly split at 13/15. Also not surprisingly, on all 3rd downs with 4 or longer to go the run pass is 10/98, with 3 of the runs being QB scrambles.

3. Wake me up before you go go

In the 1st quarter against Oakland, Tony Romo once again started a game slowly, completing only 2 of 8 passes for 43 yards and a passer rating of 45.3. With the beginning of the second quarter, the floodgates opened and he went 16-21 for 266 yards and a passer rating of 149.4.

Somebody wake this man up a little earlier.

Consistently inconsistent: Tony Romo Passer Rating by quarter, 2006-2009


2006 2007 2008 2009
1st Quarter
70.4 62.8 71.5 79.8
all other Quarters
101.5 107.5 96.8 98.0
Difference -31.1 -44.7 -25.3 -18.2

 

4. Clutch: Exactly what you need, exactly when you need it.

As we enter the final stretch of the regular season, talk about 'clutch performances' is heating up as playoff spots are on the line for many teams. The 'clutch quarterback' is not a formally defined term, but in common usage it refers to a quarterback who makes important positive plays for his team at key moments and in the tightest situations.

Traditionally, 'clutchness' was defined simply by looking at the raw number of comebacks led by a QB in the fourth quarter or in overtime. DavidH22 points out in his Captain Comeback post that Romo has an impressive 10 such comebacks under his belt already.

But instead of just looking at the number of comebacks, let's look at four different stats that come close to describing clutch situations in a game, and together add up to a pretty good clutch performance overview.

  • 4th Quarter QB rating with the score +/- 7 points: Late game, high pressure situations. If not now, when?
  • QB Rating last two minutes of the half: Can the QB manage a two minute offense efficiently?
  • 3rd and long conversions: It's third-and-long. Your team needs eight yards or more to move the chains. Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
  • Red Zone QB rating: How does a QB perform in the Red Zone throughout the game?

2009 Regular Season, min 17 pass attempts on 3rd and long

Quarterback Team 4th Q: +/- 7 pts Rating Rank Last 2 mins of half Rating Rank 1st dwn compl. % on 3rd and long
Rank Red Zone Rating
Rank AVG
1 B. Farve
GB 124.0 3 106.1 6 36.5 6 114.8 1 4.0
2 D. Brees
NO 120.2 4 111.6 4 34.4 10 106.4 9 6.8
2 P. Manning
IND 128.7 1 106.5 5 36.1 7 96.5 14 6.8
4 V. Young
TEN 83.9 14 97.2 10 35.0 9 113.6 2 8.8
5 C. Palmer
CIN 76.8 18 84.1 13 50.0 1 107.0 7 9.8
6 T. Brady
NE 78.1 17 101.9 7 37.9 3 95.8 16 10.8
7 T. Romo
DAL 103.9 6 99.8 9 36.8 5 75.0 24 11.0
7 P. Rivers
SD 82.6 15 87.2 12 37.2 4 101.1 13 11.0
9 D. Garrard
JAC 86.2 13 127.5 2 30.2 13 83.0 22 12.5
10 K. Warner
ARI 87.1 12 77.5 17 27.7 19 110.3 4 13.0
11 E. Manning
NYG 101.9 7 75.2 19 31.3 12 96.2 15 13.3
12 B. Roethlisb.
PIT 96.9 9 100.9 8 28.1 18 86.7 20 13.8
13 M. Schaub
HOU 76.7 19 78.9 15 26.3 20 110.5 3 14.3
14 M. Cassel
KC 93.1 11 91.8 11 17.9 29 103.7 10 15.3
15 K. Orton
DEN 126.4 2 62.9 25 29.3 16 93.6 18 15.3
16 D. McNabb
PHI 62.4 25 127.7 1 28.2 17 90.6 19 15.5
17 B. Quinn
CLE 114.6 5 57.6 26 29.6 15 95.8 17 15.8
18 J. Flacco
BAL 80.5 16 79.8 14 35.8 8 70.8 27 16.3
19 J. Campbell
WAS 62.8 24 65.4 22 29.8 14 108.4 6 16.5
20 A. Rodgers
GB 76.6 20 78.4 16 25.9 22 102.1 12 17.5
21 J. Johnson
TB 93.8 10 66.7 21 33.3 11 39.6 31 18.3
22 A. Smith
SF 20.7 32 112.8 3 15.0 32 106.8 8 18.8
22 M. Ryan
ATL 52.3 28 70.0 20 39.6 2 74.7 25 18.8
24 R. Fitzpat.
BUF 101.4 8 12.8 32 19.0 28 102.7 11 19.8
25 C. Henne
MIA 55.6 26 51.3 29 20.5 26 110.2 5 21.5
26 M. Hasselb.
SEA 69.2 23 76.1 18
26.3 21 72.2 26 22.0
27 J. Cutler
CHI 69.6 22 64.9 23 21.7 25 57.3 30 25.0
28 M. Sanchez
NYJ 51.0 29 56.9 27 23.8 24 83.5 21 25.3
29 M. Stafford
DET 35.7 31 46.8 31 25.0 23 80.5 23 27.0
30 J. Russell
OAK 72.0 21 49.6 30 17.6 31 62.2 29 27.8
31 J. Delhom.
CAR 36.9 30 55.8 28 20.0 27 67.0 28 28.3
31 M. Bulger
STL 55.3 27 63.6 24 17.6 30 35.7 32 28.3

Couple of observations: Good QBs play a good game regardless of situation. Tony Romo's Red Zone woes are closely linked to the overall Cowboys Red Zone disease: Dallas is ranked 22nd in the league in Red Zone TD conversion with 48.8%.

****

The remaining season schedule is easy on the eyes

Schedule09_large

****

5. Something is different about Wade's defense this year

Statistically, Wade's defenses have looked fairly similar over the last couple of years, going all the way back to his days as DC in San Diego. In fact, Wade's San Diego and Dallas numbers from 05-08 look way too close to be mere coincidence. Top in the league in Sacks, above average in Yards Allowed and Yards per Play, about average in Points allowed and Defensive Passer Rating, and way below average in Interceptions.

Obviously, getting a boatload of sacks doesn't always mean you're the best defense, but pressuring the QB and flushing him out of the pocket should in principle benefit your defense.

Wade's defensive philosophy is all about pressuring the QB to create defensive plays - blitzing till the lights go out, even on 1st downs, pressure packages from different angles and all sorts of other weird stunts that should get you sacks like they were being offered up at a firesale. This type of play can result in the secondary getting burned for big plays on occasion, and Wade's defenses have traditionally been weaker in the secondary, whether due to scheme or player material I don't know.

Yet this year, the defensive numbers look markedly different. Granted, the season is far from over, but the perhaps most important defensive stat has changed dramatically: On Points Allowed we are currently ranked 3rd in the league.

Wade Phillips Defensive Stats San Diego 05-06 & DAL 07-09

Team Sacks Total Yards
allowed
Yards per
Play
Points
Allowed
Def. Passer
Rating
INT
SD 05
46 (5th)
4948 (13th)
5.0 (13th) 312 (13th) 84.7 (24th) 10 (29th)
SD 06
61 (1st)
4825 (10th)
4.9 (7th) 303 (7th) 76.6 (11th) 16 (19th)
Dallas07
45 (3rd)
4922 (9th)
4.9 (7th) 325 (13th)
75.1 (5th) 19 (9th)
Dallas08
59 (1st)
4809 (8th)
4.9 (7th) 365 (20th) 86.2 (20th) 8 (30th)







Dallas09
28 (T 7th)
3604 (15th)
5.2 (15th) 182 (3rd) 85.6 (19th) 7 (T 27th)

At the current pace (since week 3) we'll end up in the mid forties on Sacks, so that would still be good. Our lowly YA, YPA, DPR and INT's make our outstanding Points Allowed all the more astonishing. Look to Raf's most excellent front page article for more details on Wade's Defense.

 

6. Immovable Object, meet Stoppable Force.

The Dallas Defense makes oppenents work very hard to score points. With 19.8 yards required for every point allowed, Dallas ranks 2nd in the NFL (just below the Colts at 19.9). The Giants on the other hand are giving it up like it's spring break. Their 12.2 yards for every point allowed ranks dead last in the NFL. Should make for an interesting game on Sunday.

Bend but don't break: Leading Defenses 2009



Games Pts Yards YPP
1 Colts
11 184 3,654 19.9
2 Cowboys
11 182 3,604 19.8
3 Bengals 11 174 3,274 18.8
4 Cardinals 11 217 4,036 18.6
5 49ers 11 213
3,865
18.1
.. Ravens and Patriots also at 18.1
14 Redskins 11 205 3,281 16.0
23 Eagles 11 228 3,354 14.7
32 Giants 11 261 3,195 12.2

 

7. Lady Luck is smiling on these teams

This year, the Colts have won six of their 10 games by four or fewer points — including three straight escapes in the last four games. Houston’s Kris Brown missed a potentially tying 42-yard field goal as time expired, Bill Belichick lost his much-discussed fourth-down gamble and Baltimore’s Joe Flacco threw an interception on the Indy 14 with 2:49 left in the game, thwarting any chance at a possible go-ahead field goal a week ago. Also, in every single one of their last 5 games the Colts have trailed at one point in the 4th quarter.

 

For the season, the Colts are 6-0 in games decided by 7 points or less. Including last season, they are an incredible 14-1 in games decided by 7 points or less. I guess that's one way to get to a 20-game regular-season winning streak.

Other teams kissed by Lady Luck: Miami, 4-1 this season (and 11-3 over the last two) in close games. Cincinnati, Raf's pre-season pick, is 5-2, Jacksonville is 5-1.

Lucky? Perhaps. Or as Thomas Jefferson said: "I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it."

The Steelers and Ravens have drawn the short end of the stick, both going 1-4 this season prior to their matchup last night. No surprise that that game ended up being decided in OT. Ravens improve to 2-4, Steelers drop to 1-5 in close games. All the Steelers' losses this season have been close, losing 1 by six points and 4 by three points. That must suck big time.

The Cowboys and Giants are both 3-2 this season, the Eagles are 2-2 (and were 1-5 last year), the Redskins are 2-5 after yet another close loss.

___________

Sources:

1. Randy Galloway, star-telegram.com; 2. NFL Gamebooks, AdvancedNFLstats.com; 3. ESPN.com; 4. NFL.com, 3rd and long: Stats LLC, Red Zone: USAToday.com; 5. ProFootballReference.com; 6. NFL.com; 7. Sportsnetwork.com

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 47 comments  |  19 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This Is Real Professional, O.C.C.

I know this is a continual refrain, but I can’t believe y’all do this for free while the schmucks over at the DMN are getting paid. I mean I’m sure they don’t make all that much, workin for a newspaper and all, but you can’t even compare this, a FAN POST i might add, and the average blurb you get over there. What they do over there is sports gossip, this is real analysis.

by Dansonofdirm on Nov 30, 2009 6:25 AM CST reply actions  

agreed nice work

"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."

by saidseven on Nov 30, 2009 7:07 AM CST up reply actions  

+1 to all of it ...

… and good point, maui

But what you all missed, is the obvious … the essence … the nice rack on the 5th one :)

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Nov 30, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"

by ImpactNate on Nov 30, 2009 8:26 AM CST up reply actions  

For Stat #6, Last time I looked...

Giving up fewer points and fewer yards is better. This might be the most meaningless stat you’ve used yet (albeit anything that has us nearly #1 and the Gints last is OK in my book).

The stat is highly skewed though towards teams that give up yardage, but not points. Either way, having fewer points AND fewer yardage is always a good thing. Having a high YPP is questionable.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Nov 30, 2009 7:44 AM CST reply actions  

No wonder I stress on 3rd and long...

Great post headed into December OCC. I’m one of those that actually feel more confident when it’s 3rd and short instead of 3rd and long….now I know why.

The Giants on the other hand are giving it up like it’s spring break.

LOL too funny! Let’s hope that continues on Sunday, wanna get my copy of “G-Men Gone Wild”.

Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"

by ImpactNate on Nov 30, 2009 8:20 AM CST reply actions  

+1 loved it..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Nov 30, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Awesome post yet again...

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Nov 30, 2009 8:51 AM CST reply actions  

Wake me up before you go go...

The memories of that song just made me throw up a little in the back of my mouth…

It was greatly relieved however when I got to the, umm, schedule and saw the gnats gal…WOW!

by shaneshot on Nov 30, 2009 9:43 AM CST reply actions  

The Giants don't actually have a cheerleader squad

so that pic is cheating a little – although that young lady likes to think of and promote herself as the one-woman NYG cheerleader squad. More power to her.

by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 30, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

god bless her

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Nov 30, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

amen.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Dec 3, 2009 5:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Is there one who does that for the Browns, too?

NFL teams w/o cheerleaders…WTF?

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 3, 2009 8:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Bears, Packers, Lions, Steelers, Browns and Giants all have no official cheerleaders

Packers: “The Packers haven’t had official cheerleaders since 1988, however cheerleaders from the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay and St. Norbert College appear at home games throughout the season. The Packers discontinued their squad of official cheerleaders in large part due to fan indifference.” Musta been some nasty ones.

The Steelers had cheerleaders called the Steeleretts from 1961-1970.

The Chicago Honey Bears (It’s true, I kid you not, I swear!) lasted from 1977 -1985

If ever there was a team in need of some kind of spark and enthusiasm it would be the Lions, but William Clay Ford always wanted a ‘wholesome’ atmosphere. They did bring in high school cheerleaders and baton-twirlers and throwers to the games at some point, but that nonsense was quickly abandoned again.

The Browns are still thinking about whether or not to have a logo. After that, they’ll decide on cheerleaders.

And the Giants? They don’t have cheerleaders because nobody wants to cheer for the Giants.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 3, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

there aren't enough hot women in western Pa

for the Steelers to have cheerleaders.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice!

The Honey Bears is a good one.

How about the Lionesses? They play in a dome for crying out loud.

The Green Bay SayCheeses? The Cleveland Puppy Pound?

Steelers and Giants can’t go without.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 6, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions  

*can

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 6, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions  

you can say that again :)

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Nov 30, 2009 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

lol

Coach Winters: Mississippi State's offensive set. 2nd & 2 on our own 24, what defensive set might we call?
Alvin Mack: Eagle Zipper Hero, unless the setback shifts into the I.
Coach Winters: Good..[clicks to next slide], third and seven?
Alvin Mack: Oakie Thunder Lion. {What's your assignment?}
Alvin Mack: Kill the quarterback. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Hit the tight end so hard his girlfriend dies. {{Coach Winters clicks to next slide}}
Alvin Mack: Kill everybody.

by KD Drummond on Nov 30, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice stuff

The lack of turnovers is simply ridiculous. One interception on 113 3rd down pass attempts?! The defense is just slightly ahead of last year’s putrid turnover rate. I just don’t get it…tremendous pressure on the QB the last couple of years, but just 35 takeaways in the last 27 games? Pathetic. What gives?

As for Romo’s slow starts, I remember Parcells referencing this as well back in the day. And it probably plays a large role in the Cowboys having longest current streak in the NFL of not scoring a TD on their opening possession. Not that scoring a TD first is the end all, but it’d sure be nice to put some pressure on the opposing team right out of the gate.

by DavidH22 on Nov 30, 2009 10:27 AM CST reply actions  

Sensi's cast did cost us at least like 3 INTs I think

he had 2 bounce off of it in the Seattle game if I remember right… he was in perfect position but just couldn’t haul it in

by scottmaui on Nov 30, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

manos de piedra in that secondary

Sensi’s cast, as scottmaui pointed out.

Newman’s permanent one. Think of how many he’s dropped this year.

Jenkins is the one guy back there with hands.

by Rafael Vela on Nov 30, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Spencer, too.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Nov 30, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

A FS with hands is one of my prayers for the draft

it would kick Watkins off the team, and push T. Hamlin to be better, and possibly replace him sometime in the near future. Then hopefully M. Hamlin can push Sensabaugh in his second year at SS.

by mdlusk on Dec 3, 2009 5:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree with quincyyyy

and would like to see Sensi hold down the FS position and have M. Hamlin take over the SS position in the near future.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 3, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Thank you for backing what we've seen with defensive stats. Third

and long is just scary. As I’ve said before, I’m afraid it’s going to catch up with the Cowboys down the stretch against some high-powered offenses.

by Fernie67 on Nov 30, 2009 11:41 AM CST reply actions  

Awesome

Once again!

"Coaches who can outline plays on a black board are a dime a dozen. The ones who win get inside their player and motivate." Vince Lombardi

by Boyz4Life on Nov 30, 2009 2:02 PM CST reply actions  

Hats off to Coach Joe!?!

What other factor, beyond improved special teams play, accounts for the dramatic improvement in points allowed this year?

Our turnovers are not up much.

Our YPA and total yards are worse.

Our sack totals are worse.

So, other than winning the field position battle on special teams, what else could account for giving up so many fewer points this year?

I have one answer — our own turnovers must be down, perhaps way down. What else am I missing?

by VAfan on Nov 30, 2009 3:11 PM CST reply actions  

Great Post

That's why they call them business sox

by egriffey on Nov 30, 2009 5:27 PM CST reply actions  

Really good post 0CC

But on point 7, I wouldn’t really classify winning close games as luck, or that would make your 4th point irrelevant.

The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!

by aussie_cowboy on Nov 30, 2009 8:02 PM CST reply actions  

Agree to an extent

In close games, the outcome of the game is often decided by one or two plays, and sometimes even a coin toss. The Indy examples I quoted illustrate that very well imho.

At the same time, of course it is incorrect to attribute every close win to luck. I know that I took some creative licence with the headline, and that’s why I inserted the Jefferson quote to provide a little more balance.

As with most of the stats I have in these posts, the data is (by and large) correct, the interpretation may be slanted. Fighter15 makes a similar and correct point about stat #6 above.

To quote Joe Posnanski form SI: "I realize that some people would suggest that one clueless fool with Internet access cannot make “official” proclamations… but they are wrong. We can. And we do. All the time. You can go all over the Internet and see!"

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 1, 2009 2:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Good post OCC

I am really dissapointed in our red zone%. With Witten, Bennett, RW, a big OL & Romo it looked like this team would really be good in the red zone. Why can’t these guys get into the end zone more often?

by cowboy1966 on Nov 30, 2009 8:31 PM CST reply actions  

Great stuff as always

Love the Brooking quote at the very beginning. Guy is clearly the heart and soul of the defense, possibly the entire team. Here’s hoping he rubs off on our guys before the inevitable retirement in the next few years.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Dec 1, 2009 1:42 AM CST reply actions  

Did you really mention holding on tight to my beer?

Cuz thats a natural thing. Great post as always 1cc keep em coming!

by Benthere on Dec 1, 2009 3:09 AM CST reply actions  

Great post

ST has to be the catalyst for points allowed being way down, no more short fields, too many 3rd downs, I still want more INTs but I can live w/ it if we don’t give up many points

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Dec 1, 2009 8:30 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes
Small
Garrett the next Jimmy Johnson...child please!

Recent FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui