Way to take that sack Romo!
Trust me, I was NOT saying that during the game last night. It was more like, "Throw the @$%$%$ ball!". But now that I look back, those were smart sacks and signs of a maturing Romo. At times it looked like the Eagles D had 12-13 men on the field because they were blitzing guys from everywhere. When your protection gets beat, 3 bad things can happen - sack, sack fumble or a bad decision throw. Romo did the smart thing last night...he took the sack, protected the ball, minimized the damage and came back for another play or series.
Philly got to Romo 4 times so let's look at those 4 sacks as well as the aftermath of those sacks to see just how smart they really were.
Sack 1 - 1st and 10 from our 45. Romo bootlegged out to the right after play action but Witten didn't get the key seal block on Parker the DE. The 250 lb. Parker came free with nothing but 5 yards of grass and bad intentions between him and our QB. Romo pumped, cocked the ball back again and was in his throwing motion. There were 2 receivers and 1 RB in patterns outside the hashmarks to Romo's side BUT there were 5 Eagles defenders in that same space. Romo doesn't make the bad decision throw. Instead, in that split second with Parker closing fast, he pulls the ball down, spins his back to Parker to protect the ball and minimizes the damage by taking the smart sack.
The Aftermath - 2 more plays, we punt and the Eagles start their drive from their 21. On 3rd down, McNabb throws a bad pass to Maclin who tips it and it's INTERCEPTED by Sensabaugh. Romo and the offense come back out to a short field and turn it into 7 points.
Sack 2 - 3rd and 8 from our 48. Romo's in shotgun with 2 TE's on Romo's blindside for max protect. Witten and Bennett double teamed the DE. Kosier took on Babin the DT and it looked like he thought he'd have help from Adams who ended up helping Witten and Bennett to triple team the DT. Babin beat Kosier one-on-one and put quick pressure on Romo which probably surprised him considering we were in max protect with 7 guys to block 5 rushers (4 guys to block 2 rushers on his blindside). We were expecting a heavy blitz that never came. Philly only sent 1 and left 6 in coverage. Since we were in max protect we only had 2 WR's on patterns and 1 RB for the check down. 3 pass receivers, 6 pass defenders...do the math. Romo moved right to avoid the quick pressure but again, avoids the bad decision throw, minimizes the damage and takes the smart sack.
The Aftermath - We punt and create a long field for Philly who start from their 16. They drive but the D tightens up and holds the Eagles to a FG.
Sack 3 - 1st and 10 from the PHI 17. Philly sends another blitz and the safety gets to Romo on this one. Romo takes the smart sack here and does 2 things as a result. First, he doesn't force a bad throw in the red zone and 2 he only loses 4 yards to minimize the loss in field position (he lost 7 yards on each of his 2 previous sacks).
The Aftermath - Romo comes back for another play and on 3rd and 14 completes a screen pass to Ogletree for 17 yards. The drive comes up short but we end the half with a Folk FG.
Sack 4 - 3rd and 17 from our 39. You knew the blitz was coming. Trent Cole gets into some funky stance, with his head about 2 inches from the ground like he's grazing on turf. Instead, he ate up Adams who really never had much of a chance on this one with no help. Cole got to Romo who again takes the smart sack, protects the ball, doesn't make the bad decision pass and minimizes the damage.
The Aftermath - We punt and Philly starts the drive from their 23. On the first play, Jenkins INTERCEPTS a pass intended for Maclin. The offense comes back out to another short field and turns it into 3 points.
You'll appreciate this stat.
Romo ended up with a very quiet 307 yards passing in the face of HEAVY, HEAVY pressure. The Eagles D has only allowed one other 300 yard passer so far this season...Drew Brees. Prior to that, you'd have to go all the way back to week 2 of last season before you find another QB who threw for 300 yards on this D and it was Romo in that wild MNF game. Let that sink in for a sec.
Romo keeps his head under pressure....and the blog doesn't call for his.
Last night, Romo accepted the fact that taking a sack wasn't the worst thing that can happen when the protection breaks down...as a matter of fact, there are times when it's actually the smart play. No Houdini escape attempts, no high risk throws into coverage, just take the smart sack, come back for another play and keep your ST and Defense out of a bad situation so that they can do their jobs. If he can continue to keep his head like he did last night and avoid those costly, momentum changing turnovers, I think we'll see more good things from Romo and this team. Heck, I may even find myself cheering, "Way to take that sack Romo!" during a game and I'll bet you will too.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
16 recs |
79 comments
| Add comment
Comments
The rest of the defenses Romo faces this season
before the week 17 rematch should be a piece of cake compared to that Philly defense last night.
He was incredibly calm in the storm of that pressure…..and as cool as the other side of the pillow.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 9, 2009 1:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Giants D can bring some pressure too...
…and with just their front 4. San Diego sometimes as well. But for the most part Romo should not see consistent pressure like that for the remainder of the regular season.
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
by gee-roj on Nov 9, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he'll never see the complex blitz schemes Philly throws at him
unless we play the Steelers again in the SB.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 9, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Round 4
That would be sweet.
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: 11-5?
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25
by Grady90 on Nov 11, 2009 11:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ONLY if the Cowboys win...
I do NOT want to see them fall to 1-3 against the Steelers in the Super Bowl. I’d rather they not make it, than to ahve that happen.
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
by gee-roj on Nov 12, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll never understand that logic
but then again, I’m not old enough to have the hatred for the steelers many fans do.
But I’d much rather make the nfc championship and say lose to Philly then not make it.
by foyesboys on Nov 13, 2009 4:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm old enough, but I'm with you
just get to the dance, baby
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
by dunkman on Nov 13, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Romo said he is "just seeing things now rather than throwing and hoping"
The mark of a great QB is knowing when to take the calculated risks and more importantly, when not to.
Sacks last night did not spell doom like Romo’s turnovers used to.
It’s still early, and he’ll ultimately be judged on his play in December, but you have to like the restraint he is showing these last few games.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Nov 9, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I think part of it is that he is simply seeing the field and the game better as well. Same thing I heard Brees say – at some point you understand virtually everyting that is happening around you.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 9, 2009 8:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This should be a weekly series
And this type of patience is exactly what I’ve been waiting to see from Romo. One could argue that this is the Romo we should have seen last year, but…better late than never.
Onwards and upwards.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 9, 2009 1:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
why last year??
The maturation process of an NFL qb is a slow process, it doesn’t happen over night, especially for a wild stallion like Romo.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 9, 2009 2:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
it was obvious he was struggling with it early this year, at times he got a little too conservative, some of his throws looked like they were off because he was avoiding INTs…it took a few games, but i think Romo’s coming around.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 2:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Last year because...
That seemed to be the natural progression in his development based on what I saw in 2007. Instead, last year, I saw him take a step back and become more reckless.
Like you said, the maturation of an NFL QB is a slow process, but he’s had 6 or 7 years now…so it’s not unfair to expect him to make the necessary adjustments in his game to keep getting better. No more season-long slumps.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 9, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The recklessness last year was in part
having an injured line and then trying to do too much himself. So this season even when the line is underperforming (like last night) he’s more under control.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 9, 2009 8:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, you have to throw 2008 out of the equation
with all the injuries we suffered, just not a good year all around.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
actually he's only had 3 and half years
Those years sitting on the bench didn’t teach Romo anything, the only way you learn to become a quality NFL qb is by playing, practicing with the scout team isn’t going to do it.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
actually he's only had 3 and half years
Those years sitting on the bench didn’t teach Romo anything, the only way you learn to become a quality NFL qb is by playing, practicing with the scout team isn’t going to do it.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You're st-st-st-stuttering again Terry
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry dunk, computer issues
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know but
it’s hilarious…
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 7:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You calling him a "stallion" just seems wrong....
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Nov 9, 2009 6:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
and I thought Aikman was the Cowboy QB who “took sacks”
by DavidH22 on Nov 9, 2009 10:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's Just "Turrible"
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Nov 14, 2009 2:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not really after year 1 - he threw the ball away
its hard to recover from negative yards in the NFL.
Romo has a quick release he should be throwing the ball away to save the sack.
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
by BoyfromOz on Nov 14, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the eagles blitz soooo much
that team is relentless. And our penalties that put us in long yardage didn’t help.
It should be easier, but at the same time, that doesn’t mean Romo will react better. Against Philly, you almost KNOW blitzes will be coming half the plays, so you’re more prepared to take sacks.
Also, the fact that the defense did a good job holding them down helped our O out – this is a different game if they go up by 2 scores at any point.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 2:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
only problem with Romo
is that he could learn to throw the ball away and save us the yardage here and there, but taking the sack is better than forcing something
by stephen1 on Nov 9, 2009 2:18 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
One step at a time… :)
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Nov 9, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you can't throw the ball away while in the pocket
that’s an intentional grounding call waiting to happen.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 9, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He has gotten some of the craziest Intentional Grounding calls I've ever seen
The one late in the playoff game against the Giants, I about lost my mind. He’ll probably get called for it on a touchdown pass one of these days.
by illcowboy on Nov 9, 2009 4:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you know...
… I found myself saying almost the same thing a few times last night.
yes -
but taking the sack is better than forcing something
ImpactNate is on point when he calls it a “smart sack.”
Romo continues to mature in his development, and I’m loving how this improvement is having a positive effect on our offense.
Is playing smart too much to ask?
by silverblue5 on Nov 9, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
another smart play
I forget when it happened, I think it was the drive where Roy had a couple receptions, but Romo was under heavy pressure on one of the plays where the Eagles rushed everyone, and he just lofted it up into 1 on 1 coverage to Roy – I thought that was a really smart play that will RARELY end in a turnover when thrown to a guy like Roy.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 2:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
and he threw it high so only RW could catch it
and he almost did.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 9, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yep
it was a safe throw that only roy could make a play on.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and he almost did!
that would’ve been a heck of a catch.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That would have been highlight reel material
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 9, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree completely with taking more sacks
Although it didn’t take me to after the game to realize this, I was clapping it up during the game that Romo was being patient and taking a sack when it wasn’t there. When you play a good defense you have to know to do that.
Sometimes there isn’t an open WR, sometimes the pressure gets to you, it’s ok to punt, rely on the defense and try again when we get the ball. Turning the ball over gives them great field position and momentum that we couldn’t afford to give up.
That has been my one and only knock on Romo over the years, he just didn’t seem to care at times and would make careless picks, if he wanted to grow up as a QB and take the next level he needed to take care of the ball, he’s obviously taken those steps this year so I have no quarrels with him at all.
Every game doesn’t need to be flashy, sometimes we need to be in a dog fight, where it’s not a 41-38 win, we had to trust our ST’s and defense along with smart QB play. Considering we should have 3 fresh RB’s come December you have to like our chances so far.
by LonghornsLegend on Nov 9, 2009 6:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
But think about it
when you have a suspect defense and suspect special teams, you can’t really afford to NOT try to make the play. The rest of the team is helping him as well.
I generally agree with your point, but I credit the whole team with making it possible to play this way.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 9, 2009 8:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
very true
it’s always a team effort
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we got your message......
three times LOL
by texstar on Nov 10, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was funny........
so I had to rib you a little
by texstar on Nov 10, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
P-p-p-plus one
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The other nice thing was 4 sacks and zero fumbles.
Great game by Romo. I guess that proves that it is actually possible to make big plays in the passing game without making big mistakes.
by Baked Potato Soup on Nov 9, 2009 6:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good Write up
Puts the sacks in prospective. Certainly the lesser of three evils.
by oldboysfan on Nov 9, 2009 7:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
And that's the real point
It’s about choosing not to put the game at risk.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Nov 14, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like Romo became a man last night
Seeing his amazing improvisational skills tempered with some restraint and a nice touch on the ball is bringing out the Romo we always hoped we’d see.
But you have to love his quirky escape plays too – how about the jump shot pass to MB3 to escape the sack.
Last night was the most fun I’ve had watching the boys in over a year – probably since the first Eagles game last year.
by Billito on Nov 9, 2009 8:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
and even that eagles game last year
had the normal cowboy/romo ridiculousness. We were doing fine then Romo had a great escape but threw an INT, and then soon after we were pinned in our own end zone and Romo had a strange fumble.
Personally, the game I enjoyed most this season so far was the KC game – I thought we fought and scraped and clawed and came out with one of our better wins in the last couple years.
by foyesboys on Nov 9, 2009 9:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
now thats just a ridiculous statement
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So is your theory that
it was Carrie or Jessica?
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 1:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha........
can’t wait to see the Romocism on this one
by texstar on Nov 10, 2009 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what I mean
He showed the killer combo of raw skills and discipline that could lead us to the promised land.
Relax Terry, I was complementing your BFF.
by Billito on Nov 10, 2009 5:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent post. It's a great thing to see Romo temper his Houdini act
and even better that people are recognizing it for what it is..a higher level of QB maturity. Now, when he escapes the rush and rolls out and still doesn’t see anyone open and throws it out of bounds to avoid a sack…I’ll be even more impressed than I am already.
by Benthere on Nov 9, 2009 11:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fabulous
Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden
by BishopWest on Nov 9, 2009 11:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent post!
The aftermaths of each of these sacks reveal why they can be such smart plays. Unless you’re down by a touchdown late fourth quarter, if they’re rushing everyone and the kitchen sink on a 3rd and 17, no point taking a big risk.
[As a sidenote, I don’t really have a problem with extremely long interceptions on 3rd and say 24. They can serve as a normal-length punt and return at worst and draw a pass interference call at best.]
by JohnnyRender on Nov 9, 2009 11:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your last point
the other part of it is, you have to go deep occasionally on a team that is keeping everyone in the box in order to run stop and throw blitzes at you. If you never go deep, they keep creeping in on you. So although I didn’t like the turnover, i did like the idea of trying to go deep to loosen them up a little.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 7:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great post
That’s about all I can add. Everybody else has pretty much chimed in with anything I was going to say. Romo’s coming into his own. This dude could actually become that guy we wanted him to be. He’s certainly stepped up his game. The guy’s absolutely deadly now. If not for guys like Brees and Favre, he’s probably the best QB in the NFC.
Obviously we’ll still be a bit skeptical until we see him play well in December(and I really hate to agree with the media types on this one) to cement his “elite” status, but all indications are pointing to a much improved QB.
Epic Fail since 1985
by the red scare on Nov 10, 2009 1:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Great post demonstrating Romo's development as a QB
I’m happy that he doesn’t feel the need to make the spectacular play every time anymore. He’s resigned to take the sack or throw one away and live to fight another play rather than force a pass into coverage. He’s also gotten much better at protecting the ball under duress. He’s finally realizing that he doesn’t have to win the game all by himself, but he could lose the game by himself if he turns the ball over unnecessarily.
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 10, 2009 1:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
But some of it is
he has guys making plays so that he doesn’t have to be the one to make all the plays. In the past the defense was sketchy, the running game was not good enough to carry the team unless they had the big lead, and the play calling was all about getting the ball to Owens which teams eventually took away. Now they are comfortable using a variety of weapons in a variety of ways.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 7:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
All good points, and Romo seems to be taking some steps in the right direction the last few games in this area
But no one’s mentioned the time he didn’t take the sack, because he got away with it-right before half (After WP burned the timeout, putting more pressure on the O!)
Tony R forced some passes into the end zone that could have been interecpted. And that would have been a momentum killer….The last one right into the middle, I guess trying to force it to Barber, was really bad.
Other than that, he seemed to be very calm and focused during the game and on the sdieline, what many of us have been looking for-not easy to do on the road against that Philly D.
by Realist Larry on Nov 10, 2009 1:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Especially when Witten was so open in the corner of the end zone. It looked like Romo was trying to squeeze it to MB3, but Austin thought it was to him and he deflected it. No way to tell if MB3 could have caught it without the deflection.
I don’t think they had enough time to get the FG unit out if he had been sacked.
I’ll give him a free pass on that play since nothing bad happened :)
You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.
by APerfectStar on Nov 10, 2009 1:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually I think those were good plays
he got rid of the ball on time instead of looking for other receivers. From my re-watching of the MBIII play, Barber had eneough separation to make the catch if Austin didn’t tip it. Hard to know if the pass would have been on target but at that distance, I’m guessing it would have been.
The remarkable thing to me was that the line consistently (or is that inconsistently?) made blocking assignment errors and Romo managed to not let that change his decision-making. That’s new.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 7:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If I remember right
If he’d taken a sack instead of trying to force it to Barber, time would have run out, and they wouldn’t have gotten a FG anyway. So, unless there was a big return, an INT and a sack would have been equivalent.
by jrduncans on Nov 10, 2009 8:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Nov 10, 2009 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You remember right...he can't take that sack in that situation,
When Romo took that smart sack for the 4 yard loss we called our 2nd time out. A couple of plays later, he hit Ogletree on the screen that got us to the 4 with a 1st down. He was rushing everyone to the line so he could spike the ball but the coaches used our final time out instead. With 20 seconds left and no time outs he can’t take the sack and JG can’t call a play that doesn’t go into the endzone.
What I wish is that they’d have let Romo spike the ball here even if it cost us a few more seconds. Having that time out would have given us some more play calling options from the 4 (like a run or play action pass). When you’re rushing like that, you most worry about your linemen being able to get their big butts downfield but if you look at the play again, since it was a screen, when Ogletree gets tackled at the 4, Columbo, Davis, Gurode and Kosier are all right there at the 4. Coaches must have seen something or didn’t want to get too cute in a tight game against a division rival on the road.
Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"
by ImpactNate on Nov 10, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's called "Throw it out of end zone high"
No sack though, you’re right-but that could’ve been a devastating interception.
by Realist Larry on Nov 10, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Larry, he had to force that pass or any pass
If he gets sacked, the clock runs out and we don’t get any points regardless.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Nov 10, 2009 10:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good post
Only one problem…there’s nothing here to debate.
He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson
by Fighter15 on Nov 10, 2009 6:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I second that Nate, very nice observation.
Let’s hope that Rodgers takes about 10 smart sacks this weekend and then throws up a couple of maybe’s out of frustration!
by StarPower on Nov 12, 2009 12:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















