Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Ten Worst Swings Of The 2011 Season

Seven Statistical Nuggets To Keep Hope Alive

Random statistical thoughts and musings as I pop those antidepressants at an alarming rate.

On a more personal note, while I slowly succumb to my annual December depression, I find these posts harder and harder to write as our playoff chances slowly dwindle. Let me know how you feel about these posts in the poll below.

Star-divide

1. History in the making.

Never in the Superbowl Era have there been more 300+ yards passers in a season than this year (includes adjustments for number of teams and strike shortened seasons), and the season isn't even over yet. But what's even more astounding this year, is that the winning percentage in 300+ passing yard games is an unprecedented .671. Never in the Superbowl Era has that percentage been higher, in fact 300+ passing games in the past were largely a hit and miss affair: seldom has the winning percentage strayed far from the .500 mark.

300+ passing yards games per NFL regular season, Superbowl Era, min. 26 teams


70-77 78-93 94-01 02-07 2008 2009
300+ passing games/season 7.5 51.4 62.6 71.7 76 85
No. of teams/season
26 -28 28 30-31 32 32 32
300+ games in % of total games/season 6% 24% 26% 28% 30% 41%
Win percentage .500 .482 .531 .509 .618 .671

The period in NFL history through 1977 is occasionally referred to as the Dead Ball Era, as it was ruled by low scores and stifling defensive play. Many of the most famous defenses of modern NFL history – Pittsburgh's Steel Curtain, our very own Doomsday Defense, Minnesota's Purple People Eaters and the Rams' Fearsome Foursome – all played during that time.

In 1978 the NFL instituted sweeping rule changes to increase the pace of scoring which resulted in significantly higher offensive statistics, particularly in the passing game. Some examples: the league made it illegal for defenders to contact receivers more than five yards off the line, penalties for intentional grounding were reduced, offensive linemen were allowed to open their hands and extend their arms while pass-blocking (read: hold), a seventh official was added to monitor pass interference downfield, and referees were instructed to stop the play when a QB was in the grasp of an opponent.

More recent rule changes have put more emphasis on protecting the quarterback, but also calling contact down the field on defensive backs, making the passing game easier than ever before.

League Leaders 300+ passing games by QB through week 14, 2009


P. Manning Brees Brady Schaub Romo
Rodgers Roethlisberger Favre Rivers
# of 300+ games
8 7 7 7 6 4 4 4 4
W-L
8-0 7-0 5-2 3-4 5-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1

 

2. The resurrection of Roy Williams. Too little, too late?

Roy Williams appears to be back from his extended sabbatical. Since the Philly game in week 8 (exactly 1 year after his first game for the Cowboys), he has scored 4 TDs and improved his completion rate to 53.7%.

Roy Williams Receiver Ratings 2009


Cmp Targets Yds Cmp% YPA TD INT Rating
Games 1-7
14 39 249 35.9% 6.4 2 0 75.7
Games 8-13
22 41 329 53.7%
8.0 4 0 112.8

 

3. When even stats don't make sense anymore.

Regular readers of this series know that Passer Rating Differential (Romo's rating minus Opposing QB's rating) was a highly accurate predictor of game outcomes.

Since 2007, with Romo under center, the PRD was accurate 37 times out of 39. The only two games where PRD did not accurately reflect the game outcome were the loss to Arizona in OT in 08 (Romo: 116.2, Warner: 104.3) and the  win against Buffalo in 07 in a 5-Romo-interceptions game. (Romo: 39.5, Edwards 74.1). Over the last 4 games, the PRD predictor is 1-3. Looking at the NYG and SD games, one thing is for sure: The Cowboys have lost two in a row, and the passing game is the least of the team's worries right now.

Dallas Cowboys Passer Rating Differential, 2009


TB NYG CAR DEN KC ATL SEA PHI GB WAS OAK NYG SD
PR Differential
+56.0 -84.5 +19.6 -50.4 +22.9 +75.5 +15.3 +27.3 -13.1 -4.0 +42.9 +23.2 +22.1
Result W L W L W W W W L
W
W
L
L

 

4. Bombs Away!

7 of Miles Austin's 9 touchdowns this season have come on receptions of more than 20 yards, and he shares the league lead in this stat with Desean Jackson. It is no coincidence then, that Dallas ranks as one of the top teams when it comes to scoring TD's from outside the Red Zone. Gunnery Sergeant Romo: Bombs Away!

20+yards offensive TDs, 2009

Team
20+TDs % of total offensive TDs Wide Receivers Running Backs
Eagles
15 45% Jackson (7), Maclin (3), Celek (1), Weaver (1) Jackson (1), McCoy (1), Weaver (1)
Saints
14 28% Meachem (6), Colston (3), Henderson (2), Bush (1)
Thomas (2)
Giants
13 31% Nicks (5), Manningham (3), Smith (2), Hixon (1), Boss (1), Jacobs (1)
- -
Cowboys
12 40% Austin (7), Crayton (1), Hurd (1), Williams (1) Choice (1), Jones (1)
Patriots
12 33% Moss (5), Aiken (2), Baker (1), Faulk (1), Watson (1), Welker (1)
Maroney (1)
Colts
12 31% Wayne (4), Garcon (3), Clark (2), Collie (2)
Simpson (2)
Packers
12 33% Driver (3), Jones (3), Jennings (2), Finley (1), Havner (1), Nelson (1)
Grant (1)

The Philly and Dallas 'quick-hit' offenses rely heavily on the long strike. In terms of percentage of all offensive TD's, they rank No. 2 and No. 3 in the NFL, behind only the Buffalo Bills, whose offense might better be described as a 'quick-hit-and-miss' offense, scoring 9 of a miserly 19 offensive TDs from beyond the 20.

Special mention needs to go to Chris Johnson from the Titans, who has seven (!!!) 20+ rushing TDs this year, as well as two 20+ yard receiving TDs. Only once in the Superbowl Era has a player scored more 20+ rushing TDs in one season, Denver's Terrell Davis in 1998 with 10.

***

Abigail Klein, ever the optimist, is excited that we're still in the playoff hunt

Abigail_large

***

5. Target Distribution

Romo is completing only 54.3% of his passes to the top three wide receivers (Austin, Williams and Crayton), but is averaging a robust 9.0 yards per attempt to those receivers. Romo has a 108.2 passer rating throwing to the top three wide receivers this season, despite RW's shaky start.

Surprisingly, Romo only has a 87.6 passer rating when targeting Jason Witten, largely because 3 passes to Witten were picked. Romo does complete 74.8% of his passes to Witten, which is the third highest completion percentage (behind Jones and Barber) to any of Romo’s targets that have more than 10 receptions. Romo’s passer rating to TE's drops to 83.9 when Bennett and Phillips are thrown into the mix.

Romo may want to target his running backs more, as he has a 90.7 passer rating throwing the ball to them, and perhaps more importantly, he completes 75.4% of his passes to the running backs while averageing 6.2 yards per pass attempt. (Hat tip to ScarletO for the commentary, I just updated the numbers).

Here's how the Cowboys receivers stack up so far this season.

Receiver Ratings through week 14, 2009 (min. 10 Cmp)


Cmp Targets Yds Cmp% YPA TD INT Rating
Austin
58 93 999 62.4% 10.7 10 2 125.7
Crayton
31 57 482 54.4%
8.5 4 1 98.7
Jones 11 13 79 84.6% 6.1 0 0 97.9
Williams
36 80 578 45.0% 7.2 6 0 94.7
Barber
20 26 166 76.9% 6.4 0 0 92.8
Witten
77 103 793 74.8% 7.7 1 3 87.6
Choice 15 22 132 68.2% 6.0 0 0 83.9
Bennett
15 27 159 55.6% 5.9 0 0 72.9

 

6. The lost art of tackling?

What a difference a few missed tackles can make. Think about the missed tackles on Brandon Marshall, Hakeem Nicks, Ahmad Bradshaw and Domenik Hixon in the Giants game and how they hurt us. In fact, if you review the game highlights of the Giants game, you'll see that the Dallas Defense appears to have missed tackles on all four touchdowns. Conversely, think about the missed tackles on Austin over the season, and how they've helped us.

Make contact, wrap up your opponent (use of arms is encouraged), take him down. How hard can that be? Our secondary, particularly Terrence Newman, has been getting some flak here and elsewhere for going for the highlight reel takedown or interception, only to watch the ball carrier spin out of the tackle and carry on. Many a troll has derided our team for not tackling in pre-season.

So what do the stats say? Missed tackles are not an official NFL statistic but Pro Football Focus has been tracking them for two seasons. Here's how our Secondary stacks up in missed tackles:

Missed tackles by CB's and Safeties through week 13, 2009


Top 4 NFC EAST Bottom 4
Team
CHI CIN GB MIA
NYG DAL WAS PHI
SD JAC TB DET
Missed Tackles
21 21 21 22 22 28 34 36 41 43 45 52
Rank
T1 T1 T1 T4 T4 12 25 27 29 30 31 32

Missed tackles are spread fairly evenly across our secondary. Sensabaugh (6), Jenkins (6), Scandrick (5), Ball (4) and Newman (4), Hamlin (2) and Watkins (1) have all missed their share of tackles, but overall, we're not that far off some of the leading teams in the league.

League leader in missed tackles? Philly's very own Asante Samuel with 15. To quote Bye Dawk : "I hate… H-A-T-E… HATE Asante’s lack of tackling ability". I kinda like it though ...

 

7. Ouch!

Romo has been sacked more often this year than in any previous season and is also on track to get hit more than ever before. This cannot be good. quincyyyyy, draft us some OL-men!

Quarterback Sacks and Hits allowed on Tony Romo, 2006-2009


2006
2007 2008 2009
Games- ATT
11 - 337
16 - 520
13 - 450
13 - 414
Sacks
21 24 20 28
QB Hits
34 40 69 56
Sacks & Hits in % ATT
16.3% 12.3% 19.8% 18.9%

______

Sources: 1. Pro Football Reference 2,3,5,7. NFL Gamebooks 4. Pro Football Reference 6. Pro Football Focus

Poll
Would you like to continue with these posts through the remaining regular season?
Statgeekery rules! Keep em coming
104 votes
It would be cool if you kept these posts going
52 votes
I enjoy these posts a lot more after a win
8 votes
I'm depressed. Whatever.
9 votes
Don't waste you time
4 votes
I clicked on this fanpost by mistake. Those sure are a lot of numbers. What do they all mean?
1 votes

178 votes | Poll has closed

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 74 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Abigail lifted my mood

As did the rest of your post – thx

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Dec 14, 2009 6:28 AM CST reply actions  

Agreed

I look for these every week.

by Dansonofdirm on Dec 14, 2009 8:16 AM CST up reply actions  

+1

Keep ‘em comin’ man… after losses, they help to see the ‘bright side’… after wins, it shows what we need to improve on..

Superbowl, or BUST.

by .FRoST.USAF on Dec 14, 2009 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Abigail makes me excited too

oh, that we’re still in the playoff hunt? well, that too. lol

by scottmaui on Dec 14, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree Soup

She is my favorite!

"Coaches who can outline plays on a black board are a dime a dozen. The ones who win get inside their player and motivate." Vince Lombardi

by Boyz4Life on Dec 15, 2009 11:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice post OCC

but I cant believe those missed tackle stats are accurate (not a criticism of the posts author). It seems that teams miss almost 20 tackles each game.

The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!

by aussie_cowboy on Dec 14, 2009 6:33 AM CST reply actions  

Maybe, maybe not

I don’t know what the Pro Football Focus criteria are for missed tackles, so I can’t comment. But keep in mind, these are only the stats for the secondary, the Linebackers and DL are not included.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 14, 2009 7:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry, OCC

I find this stuff utterly useless and boring.

What does it all mean? Who cares about this sh** when they playoffs are on the line?

I posted back in October about the outcome of the rest of our games. So far (sadly) I’m perfect.

Your geekstats mean what again?

Yeah, I know I’m going against “The Crowd” — whatever. I’m sure your “Crowd” will spend many hours dissecting your stats, masturbating, and then posting tons of useless, incremental posts in game threads.

It’s really not all that difficult, guys. Really.

It isn’t.

Wanna-be MBAs who kinda sorta like and get football.

by dfan77 on Dec 14, 2009 7:13 AM CST reply actions  

It may be easy, but most of us are lazy, and I for one say thanks

to OCC for going and getting the information. It isn’t like he gets paid to do it. He is a fan like us and takes his time to bring us a different perspective.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 14, 2009 7:17 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I appreciate that he's a fan, of course. . .

But the data he presents is just data — it has no context, situation, or qualitative perspective.

Like most stats.

So it’s only marginally useful. I appreciate what OCC does, but — for example — his stats present an overly-rosy picutre.

And they completely ignore upcoming opponents and those teams’ strengths/weaknesses.

by dfan77 on Dec 14, 2009 7:23 AM CST up reply actions  

WTF is your point?

Talk about wasting your time. If you don’t like it, gtfo

by ChrisRichey on Dec 14, 2009 2:18 PM CST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Wow...

I have an easy solution – When you see a post that says “statistical nuggets,” don’t read it. It’s just that simple.

Really no reason to be a jerk, though.

by JimmyK on Dec 14, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, and keep them coming, OCC.

by JimmyK on Dec 14, 2009 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

You're not just going against the crowd; you're being rude and obnoxious. Here's

an idea; don’t open the post and bother OCC or us again and we’ll all be happy.

by Fernie67 on Dec 14, 2009 4:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I think a lot of us would really appreciate it if you just stopped posting this nonsense on OCC’s posts since this is the second time you have posted insulting and ultimately asinine comments on his statistical nuggets piece. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. I am sorry you failed stat class in high school, but you don’t need to take it out on OCC.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 14, 2009 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Stats help you understand why something is happening.

Some people are happy just to know what is happening, and others like to understand why those things are happening. Honestly, since you hate stats so much, I have to wonder how much you actually get football, since points, records, yardage, etc. are all stats. It’s not OCC’s fault that you aren’t smart enough to apply the data.

That said, OCC does typically post stats that favor the Cowboys, but this is a Cowboys board, and his goal is to inspire. That’s not my style, but it works for him and makes him very popular and his posts enjoyable. If you don’t like it, don’t click. You’re like the guy who calls in complaining about TV and radio shows that you don’t like, but refuses to change the channel.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 15, 2009 12:13 AM CST up reply actions  

What an A$$?

Why click the link then?

You picked the wrong blogger to criticize!!!!

"Coaches who can outline plays on a black board are a dime a dozen. The ones who win get inside their player and motivate." Vince Lombardi

by Boyz4Life on Dec 15, 2009 11:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm

I read your whining post about receiving a warning from BTB before I read this.

I think it was the masturbating line that probably did it.

Anyway, I think OCC puts up some of the most interesting posts in our BTB community, so even if you don’t like stats, there are a lot of us who appreciate well written fanposts that may shed light on the good and the bad of the Cowboys.

If you really love the Cowboys, why would you attack OCC and the people who enjoy reading his stuff, or as you call us “The Crowd” ?

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 18, 2009 12:20 AM CST up reply actions  

I did the same as APerfectStar

What could possibly be the point of complaining about a statistical post? Dfan77, please just go away.

by rhbgsherb on Dec 18, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for the breakdown OCC

Keep them coming, I’m not a stat guy, but I do like to hear the numbers behind the numbers to get a better understanding of where this team is heading, even if it is down the crapper.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 14, 2009 7:15 AM CST reply actions  

Do you really. . .

Need a lot of “numbers behind the numbers” to figure it out?

You have eyes, right?

by dfan77 on Dec 14, 2009 7:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Nope, but my parents taught me that if I didn't have something nice to say

about some one else to keep my effing mouth shut.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 14, 2009 9:04 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 14, 2009 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!

by aussie_cowboy on Dec 14, 2009 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

+100000

"Coaches who can outline plays on a black board are a dime a dozen. The ones who win get inside their player and motivate." Vince Lombardi

by Boyz4Life on Dec 15, 2009 11:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I apprecate your effort

Reading your posts for me is kind of like watching ESPN, reading SI and the Cowboys web site all rolled into one. I love the fact that you combine so much information in one place. It is slightly overwhelming though isn’t it? Seeing that we are this good but playing this poorly?

by UTexan on Dec 14, 2009 7:38 AM CST reply actions  

From one idiot to another

I was trying to be nice, which more people on here should. God I hope you all aren’t this rude in your daily lives. If you don’t like someones posts, then don’t read them. It really makes you look stupid for continually telling someone how much you hate reading their posts but, you still go back and read their posts.

by UTexan on Dec 14, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Poor dfan77

some Cowboys fans are happy and optimistic somewhere.

This must not stand!!!

And you say THEY need lives? Project much?

by Rafael Vela on Dec 14, 2009 5:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Keep up the good work OCC

I love reading these posts.

How Bout Them Cowboys!

by sprprsnmn on Dec 14, 2009 8:41 AM CST reply actions  

15 missed tackles for Samuel...

I assume that doesn’t include last night’s game? Because if not, you can tack on a few more.

And thanks for the shout out, bud.

by JimmyK on Dec 14, 2009 12:22 PM CST reply actions  

great stuff OCC

I really enjoy these posts every week and much appreciate the effort you put into them. They make the wins more enjoyable and help take the edge off the losses.

one thing that has kind of gotten lost in the last 2 losses is the emergence of Roy as a decent WR2. Of course he isn’t performing up to his contract and expectations (and very likely won’t ever), but thankfully Miles is (playing up to Roy’s contract and expectations lol). With Miles emerging as a real WR1 and attracting more defensive attention, Tony and Roy seem to have quietly gotten their chemistry and timing together better, and it is especially good to see his red zone effectiveness in the Giants game, which is one of the primary roles we expected him to play. This bodes well for the future in case we do manage to squeak into the playoffs…

by scottmaui on Dec 14, 2009 1:39 PM CST reply actions  

+2

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 15, 2009 12:44 AM CST up reply actions  

OCC

I see that stats.. I had a couple of questions for you.

Does Dallas win in NO?
Why does the D struggle on 3rd Down?
How does Dallas score more pts?
Your thoughts on Wade?

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 1:55 PM CST reply actions  

I see the stats..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL

If anyone could answer those questions they would

1) be filthy rich
2) be the Dallas head coach the next day
3) resign the day after that. See point no. 1

No amount of stats will answer those questions, but that was your whole point anyway, so I’ll not get drawn into a lengthy reply/rebuttal thread.

Cowboyfan729 put it best recently: " Nobody on here is saying that stats perfectly define football but their use is undeniable. Statistics show trends and allow for comparisons between teams and players. As such, stats can lend some real insight into how the game of football is decided and what things to keep an eye on with respect to the future."

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 14, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope

If you see my post on this board it isn’t about starting an argument/debate, I like to pose questions to see where other Cowboy fans heads are at..

I honestly want to know what you think, I respect your opinion. I am still trying to put my finger on what the hell is going on with my team.

I don’t have enough time to have a lengthy debate.. 

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok then, for what it's worth

1. Yes. The reason is simple: I am writing this from a depressingly anonymous hotel room in Lyon, France, and I have to think happy thoughts.

2. Dallas is ranked 16th in 3rd down conv. allowed (37.1%). Our particular weakness is on 3rd and long, and what happens there is our DBs are playing about a mile back in the hopes of keeping the play in front of them and in front of the sticks. Now that will only work if the D-line gets enough pressure to the QB to force an early release. Alas, our D-line is rushing the passer with all it’s got, but more often than not, that’s not enough. That in turn gives the QB more time to pick his targets and the receivers more time to get separation. The more time a receiver has, the less chance a CB has of covering him successfully.

3. Red Zone, Red Zone, Red Zone. This is one of Raf’s favorite topics (most excellent article here). Dallas is ranked only 18th in points made per Red Zone posession. Not elite by any measure. To quote Raf “If Dallas wants to improve its red zone performance this year, it will be on Hudson Houck and his linemen to raise their power running productivity. Turnovers will also have to come down, but the biggest change will need to come from the bigg guys on the line of scrimmage.” Oh, and a couple more field goals wouldn’t hurt either.

4. Wade. Here I firmly believe you’ve got to differentiate between the media persona and the Coach. And the only reliable source I have for Coach Phillips are the players themselves – and they’ve come out in support of Wade – so I don’t buy into any of this coach cupcake tabloid fodder.

However, there’s no denying that if we don’t make the playoffs this year, Wade is likely gone. And if we do make changes on the coaching staff, I don’t want any of these fat, over-the-hill retreads like Holmgren, Cowher, Shannahan or whoever is being touted as flavor of the week. My favorite would be Mike Pettine, Jets DC, still young and hungry, and with excellent defensive credentials.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 14, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

O.C.C.

We just got back from France earlier this year. We were in Belgium for 4 years. And yeah every hotel we stayed at was so depressing. I think that is the Goth requirement in that part of Europe.
We were everywhere from Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg and France and in 4 years only had 1 great hotel experience. And that was in Amsterdam and the hotel there was freaking awesome. Our room in Paris was cool too but only because of the location. The 600 Euros a night I could have one without!

by UTexan on Dec 14, 2009 5:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Holy smokes, did your hotel have Ritz in the name?

600 * @ 1.4 dollars/euro = 850 dollars a night!!!!!!

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 15, 2009 10:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I was going to give you crap about your exchange rate

but I looked it up and its actually down from 1.52. I live in Germany and we get raped with the exchange rate being so bad so I don’t look at it to often because it’s depressing.

Might be time to buy some more Euros.

Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK

by HudBaby on Dec 15, 2009 11:29 AM CST up reply actions  

When we were there it was 1.55 to a dollar. But it was so worth it!

We almost had to look up at the Eiffel Tower. We had the Penthouse Suite in a Chintzy little hotel right by it. When the tower would light up our whole room was bright. We sat out on the balcony and smoked some good stuff and enjoyed the city. We were only there for three nights but it was pretty awesome.
And we also walked everywhere in the city because diving there SUCKS! I set about hours driving around Paris trying to get to our hotel.

by UTexan on Dec 15, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with all of your points-thanks

1- I have no choice, I love my boys..
2-The soft coverage on the edge kills me. Sure could use a better safety play.
3-The O-line is big, but that is about it.
4-Wade has to go if the season ends with no playoff Ws. I am not sure who I want to replace him though. I wonder who the hot DC will be, no one is playing Elite D. There are some good O’s,but Sean Peyton-is the OC in NO, and Peyton is the OC in Indy.

Your take on Jason Garrett?

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 7:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you think on 3rd down D

If our cornerbacks played press coverage while our safeties sit deep, like a press-Cover 2, that would buy our d-line a little more time? We would still have deep DB’s to keep the play in front of them, but a jam would buy us a couple seconds.

by Joon on Dec 14, 2009 9:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Not OCC, but I hope you don't mind if I offer my opinion.

1. Yes. Because if they don’t, the season is pretty much over. Technically they will still be in it, but with this team’s history of poor play bordering on quitting in the last game of the season, another loss likely dooms us.

2. Totally agree with OCC’s assessment about the problem being the D playing 10-15 yards off of receivers. This is also the defense that they use towards the end of the half and games, and we see how it works then, as well. Our guys don’t have the combination of recognition skills and athletic ability to break on the ball that is needed to play that type of coverage.

3. Stop trying to be so damned cute with the play calling in the red zone. Calling the same pass play twice in the row isn’t the answer, and neither is 4 straight runs. There has to be some deception as well as execution. Rarely running effectively out of conventional sets hurts the team because play action isn’t believable. Don’t suit up Folk. If he’s missing anyway, why tie up a spot on the 45 for 2 kickers?

4. When a team consistently breaks down on various units, is typically sloppy, penalty prone, and out of position, that is a coaching problem. If it were one player, or even a few players, that’s on them, but this is a team-wide problem. If almost every student in a class is getting bad grades, that’s a teacher problem.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 15, 2009 12:26 AM CST up reply actions  

no thanks for your input.

I agree.. ESPECIALLY with #1 and #4

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 15, 2009 12:46 AM CST up reply actions  

They shuld havemade t look like the same play.

And then ran something different. That would have put the D out of position and would have allowed the score.

by UTexan on Dec 15, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions  

hahaha

samuel has 2/3 as many missed tackles as our whole secondary!

Thats not shocking though. Theres too much criticism for these guys – they generally do a good job of wrapping up. Some wrs have gotten to them, but I think about half of those or more have come against the giants.

The win loss percentage with qb rating is explainable for me. Romo has made the transformation into a qb who can lead his team but will be safe rather than risky. There were so many games we won the last two years where we won because Romo was lights out awesome. And when we were losing, his qb rating took a hit as he forced passes to try to lead us back. This year, he hasn’t taken many risks, which also bring about less big plays. No longer is that qb rating stat going to be a telling outcome in the big games.

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 3:41 PM CST reply actions  

good points

Gotta keep in mind though that Samuel has 7 picks this year. I might be willing to concede 15 missed tackles for 7 INTs, with a little safety help over the top – and it’s not like the Eagles didn’t know exactly what they were getting with him.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 14, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

not saying hes not a good player

he is. hes just fun to criticize. and watch flail around attempting to make a tackle.

How impressive has jenkins been? there have been so may times I’ve watched newman and how well he covers yet when the ball is in the air, hes rarely looking for it. The opposition has no fear of him. Jenkins meanwhile, is very rarely out of position, and always seems to be looking for the bal. Campos doing a good job with him.

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Not a huge stat fan here, however some of them interest me.

Besides, it’s just another flavor to the game that some people enjoy. I read your posts One.Cool as I find them interesting and well done. On the other hand, if I didn’t, I certainly wouldn’t make a reply to it. I would simply not open it. Non problem solved. Keep up the good work. The season, despite what 90% of the fans seem to think, is not over.

by Benthere on Dec 14, 2009 5:12 PM CST reply actions  

Excellent is becoming a norm

with these posts OCC. Many of the numbers confirm , as dfan77 stated what we see with our own eyes. This I find interesting because if we can see a problem and the numbers confirm the problem, why isn’t the coaching staff correcting the problem or at least scheming to cover the problem. The lack of adjustments is frustrating.

by oldboysfan on Dec 14, 2009 6:58 PM CST reply actions  

This is my biggest issue with the Boys..

        it feels like you can see the future sometimes watching these guys. They are stiflingly predictable on third and long, late game drives, and now unfortunately field goals. Missed opportunities are always there and they always seem to burn this squad.

 I’d like to see some adjustments made in some attempt to correct this.

by SDTrueblue on Dec 15, 2009 12:13 AM CST up reply actions  

i think our

current lack of elite pass rusher (which ware was in previous years) is hurting us. On top of that, hamlin being hurt isn’t helping anything.

If we had those two peices together, I think we’d be doing much better on third down. But they’re not.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 12:47 AM CST up reply actions  

They really seem to be missing Hamlin big time.

He may not get his name called as often this year, but they seem to miss his leadership and ability to call the coverages and get guys in place. I know that I’m appreciating him more since he has been hurt.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 15, 2009 1:15 AM CST up reply actions  

I wonder

if the reason Romo’s not throwing to the rbs is because we’re keeping them in there for protection more often.

In previous years, the running backs have been a big threat for this offense. That dimension is totally gone this year.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 12:49 AM CST reply actions  

I'm wondering what happened to getting Felix Jones the ball in space.

13 pass attempts to a guy that was supposed to be the answer to “Who is going to provide big plays for this team?” doesn’t seem like they are using him properly. Even when he runs the ball, it’s typically on similar plays as the other 2 backs, as far as I’ve seen, which is the shotgun draw up the middle.

Part of the reason for less use of the RBs in the passing game might also be that Choice is now the 3rd down back, and Romo doesn’t have as much confidence in him as he does in Barber or Jones. OCC’s numbers show that he has a significantly lower completion percentage to Choice, and maybe that in turn makes him target him less.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 15, 2009 1:21 AM CST up reply actions  

Your first stat just proves

that the NFL has become a passing league, almost like Canadian or Arena football. Running the ball is just a way of keeping the defenses honest. If you look at the best teams in the league, Colts, Chargers, Saints, Vikings, all have great qbs and they all pass to score points. Even the great A.P. numbers are down because of this reason.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 15, 2009 8:20 AM CST reply actions  

Didn't get to read this before today.

The sacks have gone up yes, but his INT’s have dropped, and I recall only 2 lost fumbles (DEN, GB) resulting from sacks. I think Romo’s gotten it. Take care of the football, and be patient, it increases your chances to win the game.

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 18, 2009 12:27 AM CST reply actions  

Christmas and all the activities

that go along with it has got my BTB reading time all messed up.

GREAT stuff OCC. Let’s hope that Drew helps us out on that rating differential tomorrow night. R’ecd.

Read the dfan77 stuff and hope the response he got shows just how much the readership appreciates what you do. Your stuff is well thought out, well written and for those challenged with ADD…it’s got GIRLS! I remember a college coach years back that got fired for splicing porn into the game film to keep his players attention….you ever coach college ball OCC? I kid.

Keep doing what you do because user generated content like this combined with our lead writers really make this a top notch site.

Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"

by ImpactNate on Dec 18, 2009 8:32 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes
Small
Garrett the next Jimmy Johnson...child please!

Recent FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui