Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

Except For Miles Austin, Cowboys Need Counseling For 'December Denial'

Food. Fun. Friends. Family. And by the time the weekend was over, Cowboys receiver Miles Austin also had himself six catches for 71 yards and a touchdown. It was a "Jersey Shore'' reunion for the Cowboys receiver - a Saturday lunch at the Champps in Las Colinas with old Garfield (N.J.) High teammate Luis Castillo, the Chargers lineman, then between the two of them almost 100 guests at Cowboys stadium on Sunday including Miles' old  track and football coaches -- but even with all the things he had going ...

Fuggitaboutit.

In many ways, the Cowboys offense - unproductive in the 20-17 loss to San Diego - had maybe one member who will grade out positively. That would be Austin. Otherwise? Consider the across-the-board failings:

Star-divide

* Dallas wants to demonstrate it has the skill to throw the ball? Sorry. Overall numbers deceive here; subtract the final Cowboys possession (featuring seven completions in nine Tony Romo attempts) which was all short-pass gimmes from the Chargers, and Dallas managed just 12 pass completions during the 58 minutes when it mattered.

* Dallas wants to demonstrate it has the muscle to bull the ball? Sorry. On four consecutive critical tries, the Cowboys could barely manage to nudge it four feet.

* How about salvaging those failures with balm of a field goal? Sorry. In what is now a weekly occurrence, Dallas' Nick Folk missed a field goal. He's missed six of his last 10 tries and at this point, he might want to get with Joe DeCamilis and administer himself an overall re-evaluation, including whether he's maybe kicking with the wrong leg.

We can all march about in December Denial here, but the id and the ego don't easily endure such overall failings ... especially when they occur with such seasonal regularity. Think about it: What separates this NFL player from that one?

An attempt at an answer (a wrong one): I think it was NBC's Rodney Harrison who compared the respective passing attacks of Dallas and San Diego by noting the height of the Chargers' receivers. Malcolm Floyd, Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates are all over 6-4. But Jason Witten is 6-5, Roy Williams is 6-3 and Austin is 6-3. So that's the difference? Like, an inch? Nah.

The separation is mental. The separation is confidence.

You are human - with muscle for armor and training like a warrior's - but you are human. Roy can't get separation from a Chargers cornerback. ... Witten can only get free for harmless dump-offs. ... Folk is splaying balls around like a first-time golfer at the range. ... The 1-2-3-4 plunges inside the San Diego four-yard line net you not enough, not enough, not enough and not enough and no touchdown. ... DeMarcus Ware (who will hopefully miss just a couple of weeks with a neck sprain) gets strapped down and carted off on a stretcher.

You are human.

This wasn't a play-calling thing, not to me. Let's go back to that second-quarter sequence and the goal-line stand. You probably know that this year, on third-and-1, the Cowboys had been a stellar eight-of-nine. You certainly know that on that very drive, the Cowboys were winning the hand-to-hand combat, having pushed up the field on 12 plays - 11 of them runs. So they got to the goal-line and they rode their best horses and their best horses came up lame.

"In hindsight,'' says O-coordinator Jason Garrett, "we could have done this, we could have done that. Leading up to that, the way we got the ball down there, we dominated them up-front. It made sense to us to continue that trend ...''

I can live with that.

But mentally, there is no denying that such challenges, as owner Jerry Jones noted, "certainly will take the air out of any team.''

It's in other areas where the football IQ of this team deserves to come under question, and that's mental, too. In the final two seconds of the game, after Tony Romo found Patrick Crayton for a meaningless-other-than-Fantasy TD, Romo excitedly waved two fingers in the air. ... Yay! ... Wait, what?!

Shades of the close in Denver: What were Tony's hands trying to say? "We're down four, getting ready to kick the PAT to close it to three, setting up a miracle onsides-kick play - but let's go for the two-point conversion, you know, just for fun?''

A similar braincramp after the game, as coach Wade Phillips is describing the lay of the land: "We thought we could hold them to 20. ... but we didn't do that. ...''

Yay! ... Wait, what?! Shades of Bobby Bowden: Wade, the final score was San Diego 20, Dallas 17. You DID hold them to 20. That wasn't the problem. The problem was that your offense played 59 minutes and 58 seconds and managed only 10 points.

(One more non-football braincramp, this one the fault of the suits: You pass out 90,000 cardboard 3D glasses ... to people who are watching a football game. ... in person? Maybe you think in-game sideshows are neat; There's Eminem over there and there's the Cowboys Cheerleaders in Santa costumes over there ... but shouldn't the 180,000 eyes belonging to the 90,000 customers be encouraged to focus on, you know, the game?)

The Cowboys offense is presently left with one lone bright spot, one singular guy who remains confident enough in his ability to put on a football show that he's flying in 100 friends-and-family members, playing host to his old track coach and staging a Jersey Shore reunion with an "enemy'' from the other team. Miles Austin did his thing, with six catches, 71 yards, a touchdown. He now has 10 TDs and 999 yards and a belief that he's top-of-the-world-worthy of the attention.

Which Cowboys are confident enough, mentally strong enough, to climb up there and join him?

Comment 186 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Miles is a shining light in this season, no doubt.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 14, 2009 11:09 AM CST reply actions  

If

there’s one thing I think this team needs to push them over the edge, it’s mental toughness. I knew that the team would deflate once they saw their best player being carted off the field with a neck injury. They’re human. But I think they need to be more tough. that’s the major thing that’s missing, in my opinion.

by Dub_TC on Dec 14, 2009 11:16 AM CST reply actions  

Actually they had him

they broke that play down on the Sunday night pregame show. Ask Newman did not jam the wideout and got beat. If he jam the WR that would have delay the WR at least a few seconds………….. enuff to allow us to get that sack that we miss as River was throwin the ball. That few seconds would have made that much difference. Any way never-mind the sack they said bc of the coverage we was playn TNew was suppose to jam him any way……………..after that call it a chain reaction.

by lostar2009 on Dec 14, 2009 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Crap

TNewman is pure garbage…..garbage! When are the coaches and everybody gonna see that this guy is a FAKE. He cannot cover and he will not tackle. You can go on and on about this and that but watch every game he gets burn……that interception was’nt nothing but what he was suppose to do. Chargers walk down the field with passes over our DBs And Safeties all game…I’m surprised that score was higher! Guess what…. we’re in trouble and will be in trouble until D-backs clean up their acts and play footbal…freakin’ primadonnas who don’t want to tackle. Then there is J.Garrett predictable play callin’, buddy you won’t get a head coaching job offer now because you have been exposed!

RL Dixon Jr

by cboyfolife on Dec 14, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions  

HOLD ON

We did hold Gates to 44 yard and one TD ( a pain full TD)……..T NEW may have sum problems but he is still to good to get rid off(unless u trade him)……… When he playd the slot he was the man 5 ints at least a season i just wonder what happen….. Did he just cum off his technique sum………….

Check mike Jenkins i 4give him 4 last year he don the 21 and he did not let down…They target him and he stood up…. Not going to lie though our secondary did seem a little intimidated to b real physical with the Chargers wrs.

by lostar2009 on Dec 14, 2009 4:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Wait, I'm sorry, I think I'm missing you here...

…where do you stand on Terence Newman?

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 6:04 PM CST up reply actions  

You have the heights wrong: Miles Austin is more 6-2 (measured 6'2.1 at the combine)

and Vincent Jackson and Floyd are 6’5. Their WR’s average 2.5 inches more than us.

by quincyyyyy on Dec 14, 2009 11:16 AM CST reply actions  

WR Needs

Before the season I would have said that WR was something we need to look at in the draft, but now I’m not sure. I would say OL and S are our biggest concerns.

I guess the fact that I’m thinking about his means I don’t think we are going to get into the playoffs or if we do it will be another loss.

Hope I’m wrong.

by staubachfan on Dec 14, 2009 11:22 AM CST reply actions  

Draft needs?

With respect, all of the pieces are already here. If every unit (offense, defense, specials teams) plays up to its potential in the SAME game, this team would be among the league’s best.

I can’t offer exact reasons, but I don’t see a Parcells losing games like this…

by TigerPaw on Dec 14, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions  

The Oline sucks.....

Romo makes them look good but they stink.

by ManTab on Dec 14, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Parcells is no linger here in part because he DID lose games like this

The Romo snap bobble was the last game, he didn’t want to go through another whole offseason and season just to get the CHANCE to try it again. Everyone says we need a tougher guy, and maybe they DO, but they already had one and it didn;t work out so well. A lot of the players on this team are HIS guys, by the way.

by John Boy on Dec 14, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

We need OL, S, and WR Help

So if dez bryant declares, he could be a 2nd round steal despite his off the field issues. Taylor Mays looks like a good S prospect in the first round. and OL help can be found in the 3rd.

baseBALLIN!

by kevzta on Dec 14, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

Mays is waaay overrated.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 14, 2009 8:41 PM CST up reply actions  

WR is still need...not sure why u think its not now...

Crayton is a NON-FACTOR as the #3 WR….besides Austin there is no explosive threat at WR…Anyone watch Desean Jackson last night…..hello….yeah, we need that type of WR to make this offense go…We are getting absouletly nothing from the #3 WR position…..nothing!…Ive also come to a conclusion that MB3 is nothing more than a #2 RB….game plan needs to change next year if he is around….Newman…..been saying it forever…not a starter anymore….move him to the slot next year and let Scandrick be the #2…Sensabaugh….hasn’t done a whole lot to think we should be paying him a big contract….looks like we will be trying again or in the draft at a safety…

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 14, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely agree...

We have to get a WR that has that type of explosiveness where he can get off the line in the blink of an eye and avoid jams. This will help us tremendously on beating blitzes and giving this offense a real quick boost. For me, the perfect guy in this mold is probably Jacoby Ford from Clemson. You can probably get him in the second round (might have to trade up slightly) and he is a guy who is a track star and has that burst off the line that makes him supremely threatening to defenses. Plus, he would finally give us a threat at the punt returner position. To me, he is the perfect guy for this team.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 14, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Ford returns kickoffs, too.

Maybe we can finally take Austin off that duty, and plug in Ford and have a dynamic duo there with Felix “hold on to the d*mn ball!” Jones, and Jacoby Ford. Give him the PR duties, too, and then a few speed routes during the games until he’s fully NFL ready.

He will probably be one of two or three fastest guys at the combine. and was the 60m champion of the NCAA, and was leading the 100m when he pulled a hamstring. I want him with a star on his helmet. It’s been far too long since we had a consistent threat on kickoffs and punt returns, as well as a being without a true speed threat at WR since Terry Glenn went down. Get him, Jerry.

And while you’re at it, Jerry, get a left tackle, a guard, a ballhawking free safety, and I’ll be happy. Perhaps its time to draft another kicker, too (only half-joking about this)?

by mdlusk on Dec 15, 2009 3:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I get the feeling that someone will reach for him

based on his blazing speed and the success of fellow young speedsters DeSean Jackson and Chris Johnson. We’d have to trade up for a very high second round pick.

by Joon on Dec 15, 2009 5:42 PM CST up reply actions  

We have that guy!!!

FREE THE OGLETREEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 7:02 AM CST up reply actions  

maybe..but I would still go and draft a impact WR next year...

Giants and Eagles have loaded up with talented WR through the draft…we need to do the same starting next year. enough with the projects and late round picks.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 15, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

The only problem I have is

they need OL, DL and S help more, so anyone taken at the WR position needs to be a “project”. With Austin, Williams and The Tree on the roster, they are pretty much OK there.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Only if the Tree is developed into the type of game changer that Austin is.

I wouldn’t mind another option, too.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 15, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions  

I think he's probably the perfect complement to the other two

Miles can both go deep and intermediate, Williams is a great intermediate slant guy and The Tree could easily become a slot receiver. He runs crisp routes and has great shiftiness.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions  

So do I.

I wish they would just junk the depth chart for now and FREE THE OGLETREE!

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 16, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

A convert! Finally!

Try some of this Koolaid. It’s delicious and it makes all the pain go away…

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 16, 2009 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I said it before and it will hold true again next draft...

Jerry is not going to use a first round pick on a lineman….a first or second round WR can be a starter and we have seen that already around the league…..draafting a WR to be the #3 is very realistic….any lineman we draft next year is not replacing anyone on the OL. Jerry needs to sign some quality FA’s because thats what has worked in the past. Free should be a quality backup next year with all the experience he is now getting…

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 15, 2009 10:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I think you're wrong

I think we are ABSOLUTELY going with ol or safety or trading down.

Free could very well be the starter next year.

We’ve said we want to be a “romo friendly offense” – well, the biggest inhibitor to that is the OL. by far.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

are OL is locked in for at least another season based on there contracts..

Your not going to see a first round lineman drafted by Jerry…never!

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 16, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Jones made this mistake in the Aikman era

by waiting until too late to re-seed the O-line and ending Aikman’s career pematurely. Essentially you’re betting that he will make the same mistake again. You could be right, but I think based on his ominous statements this season about linemen, he is not going to. I think line will rank high on his list, followed by safety and D-line,

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Regarding Romo, I'll just C&P what I said in Raf's post:
Actually, I disagree with you and some of the press on the “garbage time.” Romo was moving the ball in those waning minutes trying to put the team in position to try an onsides kick. In particular against New York, if the Cowboys recover that ball, who knows what could have happened? I realize that time just ran out yesterday, but Romo wasn’t just driving down to fluff his stats. He was trying to put them in position to tie or win.

I’ll just add that someone is getting those balls to your shining star, since he’s not throwing them to himself.

by Fernie67 on Dec 14, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions  

+1

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I guess we have to wonder

why the offense that they run during the last 2:00 of an out-of-reach game that scores touchdowns so easily isn’t run during the rest of the contest…my guess is it’s because the opposing defense isn’t playing a “prevent” and letting the offense have those little, time-consuming chunks of yardage.

I know, I’m a genius.

It’s no reflection upon Romo. But we do have to recognize that when it comes to crucial 4th down drives the past two weeks, especially drives in response to the opposing teams TD’s, the Romo-led offense has sputtered – to put it mildly – when it counts. Jesus, you can’t depend on recovering onsides kicks to win games…

by DavidH22 on Dec 14, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, "Romo-led offense" tells me you do put it on Romo, which I don't get.

What Romo should able to count on is his O line and the starting running back being able to punch it in from the one-yard line in four tries after a drive that has gone the length of the field, and his kicker being virtually automatic after a key interception. Ain’t happening, and that most definitely is not a reflection on Romo. One thing for sure: last week and this week, based on Romo’s performances, as well as those of Witten and RW and Austin and even Crayton, it shouldn’t have come down to trying to recover onsides kicks.

by Fernie67 on Dec 14, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

For what it's worth.

Dallas opens +7 against NO. The only other game Dallas has been the underdog this year was the Eagles game. Do you see a pattern here. :>)

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 11:27 AM CST reply actions  

A trend..

..usually has a sample size larger than 1. Just sayin.

Should be a fun game as the Saints play defense lately, almost as an afterthought. However, the ’Dome crowd after being forced to watch their saviors take a two-week road trip will be in a bourbon-infused frenzy come Saturday. If the unit that defensed Tom Brady shows up we could have a repeat of the last time the two teams played.

by TigerPaw on Dec 14, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

I was joking about the pattern.

NO is as tough at home as it gets. Dallas will have play an all most flawless game to win.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

Hmmmmmm,

I was guessing it would be double digets.

by Road Warrior on Dec 14, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Some of this seems like a stretch, Fish

I wonder if you’re ignoring some facts to further your theme here.

Witten has had a few good games in a row, with decent YPC. To say he’s only getting free for “dump offs” is misleading.

Also, I would call Tony Romo a bright spot on offense. 3 picks in 9 games. Excellent completion percentage and QB rating of late. Little to no help from his OL. To ignore him in favor of Austin as our “lone bright spot” seems a bit much.

Lastly, the runs that got us up the field on that drive that you cite were draws and runs out of the shotgun. As I think Raf noted previously, these are the runs that we are good at, but they not runs that work well in a goal line situation. So thinking that calling more traditional power running type of plays on the goal line would work seems a bit foolhardy (especially considering we were now facing an 11-in-the-box defensive front).

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 11:47 AM CST reply actions  

+1

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 14, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

+1 - good one; hehehe

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Dec 14, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Not sure it's just a December Denial

I think it may be much deeper. How often have you heard phrases like ‘Dallas has all the talent in the world’, ‘We have all the talent we need to win almost any game that we play’ or ‘Our talent level is better than our record’.

But is it really true? Or is it just a marketing story we’ve all been suckered into?

There is one question that Jerry needs to ask himself, and that is “Is this team really as talented as everyone, and especially me, is saying?”

If it is, then the whole coaching staff needs to go. Simple really.

If it isn’t, then Jerry & Co need to rebuild this team around a core of perhaps 10 players, and give up two or three crown jewel players along the way.

Over the next three weeks, Jerry will need to take a long, hard and honest look at the overall talent level on this team. All else follows.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 14, 2009 12:07 PM CST reply actions  

Agreed

It seems like Jerry is always the one saying how talented the team is. If true, who does that reflect positively on?

I would love if Jerry would make like the Patriots or Eagles and take a long look at the roster and get rid of players who are getting by on reputation or who may only have a good year or two left. But I seriously doubt that he is capable of accurately making such hard decisions.

by DavidH22 on Dec 14, 2009 12:22 PM CST up reply actions  

If you look at the rest of the NFC East, they have incredibly talented, young receiving cores

The Giants have Hakeem Nicks, Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, and Kevin Boss. The Eagles have DeSean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, Jason Avant, and Brent Celek

baseBALLIN!

by kevzta on Dec 14, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

that's what happens when you actually draft players at the skill position early in the draft

Dallas doesn’t, Jerry would rather draft projects or wait until they hit the undrafted free agent status…..that’s a losing philosphy as far as I’m concerned

by Deke on Dec 14, 2009 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree..

Another thing that do well is allow their young talent to develop on the field. Hurd and Ogleetree have made plays all season and still don’t see the field. If Maclin(i know he is hurt now) was a cowboy he would be on the bench. Reggie Brown and Avant would be starting.

Chargers cut Chambers(they gave up a 2nd rounder for this guy) who is now another teams #1, so their younger, more explosive players could see the field.

We don’t draft talent early and even when we hit on the talent, they don’t play.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

How true.

Heck, we’d have never seen Miles if Roy hadn’t have gotten hurt.

I guess this points out that our coaching staff can’t see the talent level in practice. Either that, or their just plain idiots. Take your pick.

by Road Warrior on Dec 14, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Not just the coaching staff. JJ makes no bones in boasting that every aspect

of this team’s functions are under his purview.
That includes as to whom is drafted, and what they are paid.
There will be one happy day when this martinet finally steps down and lets a football mind run this club.

Wharter

by Wharter on Dec 14, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Bingo Deke!....

How about going out and draft a first round play maker instead of trading down all the time…..

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 14, 2009 2:53 PM CST up reply actions  

co-sign

Is playing smart too much to ask?

by silverblue5 on Dec 14, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Not sure why that makes a difference

cause when you look at it Dallas is 3rd in offense in the entire NFL. Also , we have the most receiving yards in the NFC East to date. We also have one of the up and coming wideouts in Austin. He has started a little over half the season. He is tied with Fitzgerald for the most touchdowns with 10. He is one yard from a thousand yard season. Also, we have a 27 yr old tightend who btw is one of the best all around tightends in the game. The reason I say that is cause alot of the top tightends rarelyt block well, which is a big deal to Witten.

We have talent you just have to have someone to make it better and push it over the top.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 14, 2009 1:11 PM CST up reply actions  

just off the top of my head

 3rd in offensive yards is a useless stat, we’re around 13th in scoring, it’s all about scoring. 79 points in the last five games, three of those td’s and yards come in garbage time, that’s 8.8 points per game going into the fourth quarter..that’s not getting it done, period

This team doesn’t have enough speed outside on offense.

by Deke on Dec 14, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

you know that some point in every season teams

get the so called garbage yards :). A team that is never blown out and has lost 5 games by no more than 7 points is not a team lacking in talent. Its mental breakdowns and not executing and a little has to go the way of coaching.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 14, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

because our explosive player aren’t in the game in the red zone. Ogleetree, Felix, and even Hurd to an extent.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Agreed, I feel like Hurd would be more productive than Crayton if given the chance

Ogletree still might be a bit raw, but he’s also another guy who needs to see the field at least a couple times per game.

by Joon on Dec 14, 2009 4:14 PM CST up reply actions  

EXACTLY

How does a guy develop without seeing real game action?

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 14, 2009 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

forget speed. the raiders have speed

we need PLAYMAKERS

It's not that I'm saying we're due a playoff win, but I didn't have my license to drive when we won our last one...

by bulldog jeeper on Dec 14, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Holy crap

those are gawd-awful numbers

by DavidH22 on Dec 14, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions  

i think so too

I thnk we are talented at a few positions. QB. TE. WR. RB, although I’m not sure Barber is the kind of starter you need in this leagu, but garrett did a good job mixing all 3 guys in. Honestly, I felt that barber should have scored on the 2nd and 3rd down runs, he had an opportunity to where he usually comes through.

Defensively…we’re playing with a lot of heart but i question the talent here. It felt o me the last two weeks that even if we scored a td after the opposing team took the lead, they’d give it right up. We don’t have depth anywhere at all. We have talented starters at NT, OLB and CB, but I’m not too sure about our safety play, ilb play or DE play (Spears, Igor and Bowen have generally been serviceable). I think the lack of depth has a huge effect on our late game pass rush.

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 2:02 PM CST up reply actions  

This team is #3 in total yards and #13 in points.

That just ain’t right. Some is rotten at Valley Ranch.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

they were having this same problem in training camp Dire......

remember, they were moving up and down the field but couldn’t produce points-not enough points for the amount of yds. they were putting up. We were told that they were working on some things in the offense. I guess they’re still working-LOL?

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe someday they will get it down.

I think it’s too late this year.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 2:40 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed......

what I don’t like is the trend from last year still exists. Remember Romo was throwing interceptions in TC. We were told by Romo not to worry because they were working on some things. This would all be cleaned up. This year (2009) when we couldn’t score, Romo said not to worry because they were looking at some new plays yadda,yadda,yadda. Well, here we are 14 games later and we still have the same problem. We can’t score in the red-zone. I didn’t know until yesterday, or I blocked it out, that we hadn’t scored on an opening drive all seaso. That’s pretty pathetic when you look at it.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

If Dallas doesn't win out then no one will have to

worry about the red zone or anything else this year. I don’t think 10-6 gets us their. Dallas doesn’t have much chance to win tie breakers with the teams in the wildcard race.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed.......

I hope I’m wrong but I have this really bad feeling that the Giants will still get in. We should have taken care of business against the Broncos,GB, and Giants then we wouldn’t be in this stituation though.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 2:58 PM CST up reply actions  

a lot of it is the OL

We’ve seen entire halves go down the tubes cause of penalties. There are games where we get into the oppositions territory and IMMEDIATELY get a penalty. Its ridiculous.

but we’ve seen bad turnovers and fumbles this year too.

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 3:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Romo and Austin are shining examples

Yes, even Romo. Simply for the fact that for the first time in his career, he’s actually still playing good football in December.

2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: not 11-5 :(
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25

by Grady90 on Dec 14, 2009 12:08 PM CST reply actions  

Horrible play calling.... Bad coaching!!!

Good teams, EXPLOSIVE TEAMS, like the Giants and the Eagles last night call plays that allow them to throw the ball down the field for 50+ yards on any given play. The Cowboys are looking like some crappy version of the Patriots offense, without a deep threat still. We have a deep threat in Miles Austin and Ogletree — but nobody wants to call any plays to bomb the ball deep to these guys! Frustrating!!! We are so darn 1 dimensional, it makes me sick. The Shotgun is being used TOO MUCH…. We need to get back to the AIKMAN days where we ran 85%+ of our plays from the I-FORMATION where a run or a pass can totally surprise you. When you go from Shotgun back to a heavy package — the defense can totally predict RUN 90%+ of the time! It’s time to ditch Wade and bring on SHANNI in 2010!

by hakrjak on Dec 14, 2009 12:09 PM CST reply actions  

that's the truth........

Norv had some very creative plays that first drive didn’t he? Reminded me of when we beat the 49’ers the first playoff game. Oh, those were the days.. Remember how he ran Moose pretty much that whole first drive. Totally threw the 49ers off.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Ditching Wade isn't the answer to the offense

ditching redball is

It's not that I'm saying we're due a playoff win, but I didn't have my license to drive when we won our last one...

by bulldog jeeper on Dec 14, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Also, this offense needs more use of BOOTLET & "MOVE THE POCKET" plays!

I believe EVERY one of the plays called last night where Romo moved the pocket, or had to throw the ball on the run was a success…. Yet JG calls NO BOOTLEG plays EVER! Romo is a THROW ON THE RUN Quarterback! He thrives in that environment. If the OL can’t block for him, he needs the opportunity to roll out and make big plays down the field.

by hakrjak on Dec 14, 2009 12:12 PM CST reply actions  

coaching

when jerry jones fires wade and he will. he needs to serioulsy think about hiring a real gm to actually evaluate the enitire staff from coaching to players with an unbiased eye because he will find things that will need to be changed.

by wlay on Dec 14, 2009 12:27 PM CST reply actions  

untill he hires a real football gm....

and let him have control, expect more of the same. i don’t see guys like the walrus,or shanny,go to dallas without at least a promise of a free hand. all this talk of romo’s play,draft picks are meaningless without change at the top.

by r c a on Dec 14, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Jerry Jones is...

from the Dan Synder school of nepotism…or vice versa…did you know they pal around during the offseason?

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Dec 14, 2009 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

What was the message in the offseason?

Tougher HC? Does anything look different this season from the previous two? Is the tougher HC, who is now a dead man walking and the players know it, paying off?

by cow_fanatic on Dec 14, 2009 12:32 PM CST reply actions  

They need to replace Bradie James...

This is the second straight game where he was a no show. I’ve never really been sold on him anyway. He’s been here for the past five or six years and not much to bank on. Time for some new blood.

by TheCowboyFan on Dec 14, 2009 12:37 PM CST reply actions  

He's second on the team in tackles with 90, only 2 behind Brooking

But we do need Jason Williams to grow up in a hurry for next year.

by Joon on Dec 14, 2009 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

???

Of all our problem areas, you think Bradie James is our main issue?? Really?

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

You want to can him based on how many times you've heard his name the past two games...

Let me repeat: 90 tackles, good for 2nd on the team, 2 behind Brooking. We have bigger needs to address in the offseason than that, especially when we drafted Jason Williams to eventually take over.

by Joon on Dec 14, 2009 7:41 PM CST up reply actions  

He is the playcaller...

and for him to be basically non-existent when the team needs a playmaker is unacceptable…yeah 90 tackles, 58 solo is more like it with one sack. Last year he had 8. If you’re happy with his stats, that’s fine.

by TheCowboyFan on Dec 14, 2009 8:05 PM CST up reply actions  

It looks as if Wade is blitzing Brooking more, keeping OL off of him so he can roam.

Bradie is doing alot of the grunt work and playing defensive QB.

He made a nice play in the 3rd quarter (I think it was)…a TFL. We can’t expect him to be Patrick Willis.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 14, 2009 8:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, he's doing his job

I’ve seen both him and Brooking making plays in the middle. I guess people are downgrading him because of the sack decrease, but as you pointed out, Brooking is the one I’ve noticed more on those inside blitzes.

I think they are solid in the middle behind Spears,Rat, and Drago.

They’ve shut down most teams running games.

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 15, 2009 12:12 AM CST up reply actions  

thud

that was the cowboys’ season landing. dallas will finish 9-7 and wade will be or should be fired right there on sidelines after last whistle. several of you have already said it, this team lacks mental toughness. most times teams tend to emulate the coach in mindset. i think thats right in dallas’ case. sense of urgency, never saw it. from either wade or team. i don’t even want wade coaching defense. dallas needs heart not wade. and mine is not a knee jerk reaction. it’s reality imo.

by maxdout on Dec 14, 2009 12:53 PM CST reply actions  

Why does this team not play with a sense of urgency?

they go through a game like they’re sleepwalking, then when it gets to the end, they wake up and say “Oh it’s getting close to the end, we better start playing. That’s when the offense plays with some urgency only to end up short.” For those that disagree I will give examples: Ravens 2008, Broncos 2009, Giants 2009 (first game), Packers 2009.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 12:57 PM CST reply actions  

Agree

I totally agree with you, sitting watching another lost saying to myself, look at these guys sitting around joking like the game is over and we have won! No kind of urgency with no one except KBrooking and then when its 3min left they play like they’re tryin to win…..Those are coaches faults…..and itis Bulls..t!!!!!!!!

RL Dixon Jr

by cboyfolife on Dec 14, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Then you missed

Romo dropping the F Bomb as the clock was expiring.

It’s fine to mad and frustrated at losing, but trying to connect that to invented character flaws in the players is just silly.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 14, 2009 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Dunk......

I’m not talking about character flaws like cboy…..I’m talking about playing with an aggressive offense/defense and not playing back on your heels. Instead of reacting to the other team scoring, I mean playing an uptempo offense that is attacking instead of looking flat and uninspired. Make sense?

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

It does make sense

I am not sure if it’s urgency or a sharpening of their focus, like we’ve seen at the end of games or in the hurry-up, for example. My impression is that the o-linemen lose focus at times in the game – you see multiple glaring mistakes that indicate headspace and timing issues. In the last game I saw Free just completely miss his guy (no stunt or twist, just a straight-ahead pass rush. The guy must have thought Christmas came early) which led to a Romo sack. Hands to the face, false start, holding… all mental errors.

I just don’t know what you can do with guys like that except replace them over time.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 7:08 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree........

one thing that Phil Simms was saying on the broadcast Sunday when we got penalized in the Red Zone for a false start (it was Free btw.) was that sometimes whenever Romo is doing all of his adjustments at the line it takes too long and it’s hard for the line to hear especially when you are down on the goal-line. It’s apparently very hard for those guys to keep in that stance whenever Romo is audibling or whatever he’s doing. Therefore, you get a false start. I’m not blaming Romo, but I wonder if sometimes whenever he’s doing all the audibles etc. if it messes the line up because they can’t hear him. Maybe, instead of trying to get so fancy, they should just call a play.

by texstar on Dec 15, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe it's their size or just poor focus

Peyton Manning’s line waits longer than Sergio Garcia’s golfing partner and they seem to do OK. It may be valid for these mooks, but maybe nothing will work. Last week I saw someone jump before Romo even approached the line. It was nuts.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 15, 2009 7:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Sure, that's all well and good...

…but what about Terence Newman? Do you perhaps have an opinion on him?

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions  

well not sure what you watched Sunday

but there were more than one bright spot on this team. We have a lot of gifted athletes but players alot of the time resemble their coaches. Tough minded offseason, practices, meetings, etc. , we just don’t get that with Wade I am sorry. He is a decent D- coach but not head coach to me. You change the mindset from the get go with a coach with the likes of Cowher, Dungy, etc.

Romo has really matured, have we heard how many mistakes he has of late? The d-line shut down the run except for on drive only, so LB’s playeda part in that. I am sorry but Hamlin is better playing in the safety position than who we are throwing out there in his place. The running backs are doing what they are supposed too ….well that is until they need a season defining 1 yard gain and they fail. Like I said that is the will to more than anything. We have talent and we can draft and pursue FA’s but what we really need is a guy to lead them over the top. most of the teams winning either have a good established HC or one that is young and onfire with alot of spirit ( aka the HC of NO).

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 14, 2009 12:59 PM CST reply actions  

yep I agree...

Wade is not a winner and thats a fact….Folk should have been cut first thing this morning but knowing wade he will keep him on the roster..Wade needs to shake things up going into these last 3 weeks to get his team going in the right direction. Standing pat and sitting on your hands is not the answer right now..

by scandrick32 on Dec 14, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Wade is a winner, just not a winning when it counts HC :)

He’s like a compliment piece to a workable puzzle. He just doesn’t finish or have the personality to will the team to wins when they need it the most.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 14, 2009 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

When the Cowboys got to the Chargers 26, with about a minute left, they should have kicked a FG right there.

If, (and this is a big if) Folk had made it, they could then have tried the onside kick, and if (a bigger if) they’d recovered it they may have had time enough to get in the endzone for the tie. 7 meant nothing with 7 seconds on the clock. , time was everything. We lost, okay, bring on the Saints.

Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!

by CowboyMan on Dec 14, 2009 1:13 PM CST reply actions  

Absolutely - I was wondering...

when someone else was going to point that out – Raffy and Fish totally missed this point – I think more and more teams are doing this; either the games are fixed or the QBs are just selfishly racking up the stats because stats = $$$$$. It was obvious that Romo/Cowboys had conceded the game in the last minute for some reason. Good one, CowboyMan – you gots it right, bro.

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Dec 14, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought the same thing

except at the time I stated, “They should let Folk miss it now so we don’t get our hopes up.”

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

LOL

Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!

by CowboyMan on Dec 14, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

plus

then when he did miss, Wade could keep up his illusion that Folk hasn’t missed any crucial FG’s.

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 2:28 PM CST up reply actions  

That's what I would've done in Madden

I’m telling you, that video game teaches you clock management skills that traditional football coaches seem to lack.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 14, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Charger fan here

Just wanted to point out that Romo didnt have a “brain cramp” when he was holding up two fingers. He wasnt demonstrating that the ‘boys would go for two. He was simply saying there’s two seconds left on the clock.

by AirNorval on Dec 14, 2009 1:23 PM CST reply actions  

Thank you!

I originally read this article on my phone and meant to get to the computer and point that out.

"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee

by BigDinSC on Dec 15, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Coulda been a peace sign.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 16, 2009 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

What I hate about this year is

the Boys were in position to win every game except the GB game. No team has blown out this team, as a matter of fact the Boys have outplayed most of the teams that beat them. Here we stand head in hand backed up to the wall.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 1:24 PM CST reply actions  

exactly, talent wise we match up with everyone but

the problem is mentally we dont always excel :)

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 14, 2009 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

The Cowboys need that killer instinct that the teams

of the 90s with JImmy had and the great Tom Landry teams had.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

It's almost like the don't want to win in December.....

Call me crazy but Sorry, but it’s the same December pattern.

What happened last week after we scored the TD to go up 10-0? Defense lets the Giants march right down the field. Not to be outdone, on our next drive the offense says ‘hey, we can top that’…. Barber, chuck them the ball. Game over.

Yesterday, We get a 3-0 lead. Next drive, SD goes right down the field for the 7-3 lead. Stays 10-3 for nearly 2 quarters… and FINALLY, we tie it. Wheeeeew. There might be a chance?

Ummm, no. NEXT drive, defense lets them march right down for the winning score.

Successful teams win these games.

by Road Warrior on Dec 14, 2009 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

co-sign

Is playing smart too much to ask?

by silverblue5 on Dec 14, 2009 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Funny that you brought up the 3D glasses Fish

they kept showing fans wearing them during the game, and every time they showed an adult I wondered out loud why they don’t take them off and actually watch the game.

Another thing I wonder.. Why run a fake pitch on the goal line? Running on the goal line was fine, but the play on 4th down, IMO, was horrible. The fb dive, fake pitch is a good play, but for one yard? Ok, so you keep the backside honest… ok? It does nothing to help open up the hole and only takes away another blocker AND only gives Barber two steps of momentum before he hits the line.

Another thought. Can someone explain why I saw Phillips lined up wide so often? I thought he was a blocking TE? He was the guy Romo tried to force it to on third down before they had to settle for a FG. Why? Bennett didn’t even line up wide that much lol.

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

A pass on 2nd down just to keep the SD D honest

would have been nice. SD D was keying on MB3 on each play, even when lined up at FB.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 1:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely

make it a roll out, let Romo pass or run, in short do ANYTHING to force SD to widen their defense and not precisely know where the play was going.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 14, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah im surprised he didnt go with the fade to RW again.

I definitely would have liked to see a pass but you cant really blame him for calling runs. A play action would have been wide open tho IMO.

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

If you look at the 4th down play

a fake to MB3 and pitch to Felix was a walk in play. They faked the pitch and nobody bit on it.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

SD was a step ahead on that play

it’s backwards to run the dive there. If you fake the dive you can get the end to bite inside, leaving the pitch open like you said. the players that faking the pitch keeps honest aren’t affecting where the ball actually goes. They should have lined Barber up behind Anderson, put Witten tight left, motion Phillips to the left and run the naked boot. Oh well.

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

What the Cowboys need is a head coach that is a get in your face kind of guy and secondly a offensive coordinator who isn’t afraid to attack a defense when they are on their heals. Run, run, run all up the middle. Why not a 2 back set with Choice and Jones and let one of them run it to the outside, or maybe give it Austin out of the backfield and let him leap over the pile for the td. Get creative Garret or move along. Phillips your in the wrong business. If you want to coddle and protect your KIDS go be a kindergarten teacher. This is football, quit making excuses for them. Its my fault, thats all you say. When is it their fault? They are grown men, quit protecting them. So much talent and your wasting it? Please resign, im begging you.

by Going42 on Dec 14, 2009 1:44 PM CST reply actions  

Romo put two fingers up in the air...

cause there were two seconds left when he looked up.

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 1:51 PM CST reply actions  

Romo was not a bright spot?

Ha.

Hawkeyes n Cowboys. Bleeding Black, Gold, Sliver and Blue since 1987.

by HawksFlyHigh on Dec 14, 2009 1:56 PM CST reply actions  

I guess........

but, usually he just disappears when Romo does bad. Romo didn’t do great, but he wasn’t the reason we lost.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Answer me this texstar

Three games left in this season, does Dallas win another game if so against who?

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I honestly don't know.......

but I have my doubts that they can win another game. Think about it. The Skins are playing pretty good-not great-plus we have to play them up in Wash. I don’t see how we beat the Saints especially w/o Ware. We never beat Philly in Dec. I said all this to say I think we are done for the year.

by texstar on Dec 14, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions  

It's hard to argue that

They have the ability to win every game but not the mental toughness. Hope is not completely lost obviously, but 3 straight losses would be crippling, and can’t you just see the Saints coming out firing on every cylinder?

Each loss hurts just a little less than the one before. I can’t put my faith in this team, whether it’s the players’ or coaches’ fault. I say this knowing they are one or two big wins from sucking me back in, but I think I’ve finally changed my opinion on this season. At this point, I really want to see Wade and Garrett go. Hopefully Joe D stays. That’s all I’ve got.

I can deal with losing when it’s against a better team, but I really think we are better than the likes of SD and NYG. whatever.

"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."

-Ari Gold

by Young Wiz on Dec 14, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions  

The problem is structure and talent.

A head coach must coach, inspire, lead, put the players in the best possible position to succeed and get the most out of the players that he has at his disposal to achieve ultimate success. Just as important, the head coach needs the authority to threaten to get the most out of the players and coaches that are under him.

Without being in the locker room or meeting rooms I cannot sit here and say that Wade doesn’t do the things listed above, except one thing I do know and that is that Wade doesn’t have the authority to threaten the players or coaches and make changes to personel as he see’s fit. That task is at Jerry’s feet by design. I’m not even sure that if Wade had that power that he’d make the correct moves at this time but we will never know.

Wade’s chance to succeed in this type of structure hinges on emmense talent in all areas of the team and to have the players execute the plays designed for them. When things go south under this type of structure, Wade doesn’t have the tools to correct the slide. The system in place is too easy for the players and coaches to offer their excuses as to why the job isn’t getting done. The accountability of said actions is void and it makes Wade look like the bad guy.

Wade was doomed from the start without all engine parts running smoothly by accepting the head coaching position without any authority over his offensive coordinator and personel decisions. Dating back to last year, we’ve all been screaming for accountability from the players, but the one area that seriously undermines Wades authority wasn’t even offered as he accepted the head coaching position and that was Wade’s power to hire and fire to effect change.

Honestly Wade isn’t the type to be ruthless and threaten. He will ask and expect the players to play hard for him and most do. Problem is some probably don’t, there are always a few on every team and it only takes a few less than stellar efforts to stall a team’s success especially when they know Wade cannot let them go as a result. The most Wade can do is demote them and hope those players don’t erode the team.

As far as coaches are concerned, all Wade can do is ask for their best, he cannot demand their best or else. Big difference there. Until the structure of this team changes, expect no change in the results unless we load up on talented players who demand their brothers play at their level and hold themselves accountable. We just don’t have that much talent for that direction to take hold. We need talent in the trenches and structure from the head coach down. I feel badly for Wade because I think he’s a nice person who deserves better, but it is what it is. I just pray that the next head coach that’s hired when the time comes is given the authority to hold all personel accountable or else. More talented players who execute wouldn’t hurt either.

by T Zig on Dec 14, 2009 3:05 PM CST reply actions  

a bunch of responses. ...

OK, here goes:
*Romo’s final numbers are solid. But the 7-of-9 at the end was largely meaningless. So I’m pretty stuck on completing 12 passes and scoring 10 points over the course of 58 minutes … Am I being too hard on him?
*On heights, I’m rounding up to make a point. Malcolm Floyd could be SEVEN-foot-5 and that shouldn’t be any reason for him to be a more productive NFL WR than Roy.
*I agree with the FG-first idea … (I believe Simms addressed it on the CBS telecast.) And with the Madden observation; someday there will be an NFL GM who grew up on Madden and who will admit that it’s a scouting/management aid. …
*We can presume that Tony’s 2 fingers meant 2 seconds. I guess. But even then. … what does it mean? A 90-percent chance of not recovering, a decent chance of all those 2 seconds expiring while the onside bounds about … but yeah, ok, hooray, 2.
*’Jersey Shore’ vs Garfield, NJ … All I know about it is it’s up yonder and it ain’t Texas … so it’s all the same to me. :)
Fish

by Mike Fisher on Dec 14, 2009 3:12 PM CST reply actions  

the last two weeks

the only legitimate criticism of romo would be his drives in response to an opposing score in the fourth – his only 2 personally bad drives of the last 2 games happened then. Now those were clutch situations for sure, but 2/20 is pretty small.

In general…..we ran all over them, some receivers dropped balls, some plays the chargers had good defensive coverage. We should’ve had at worst 16 points when the chargers scored their 17th.

I just think that the story of this game should not be Romo, it should be the way this offense has continued to shoot itself int he foot as soon as it gets in scoring position. Or maybe a better reason would be poor ol play in the red zone?

by foyesboys on Dec 14, 2009 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, it wasn't Romo's fault they couldn't get when on the goal line... there is 7 points.

And he didn’t miss that field goad. Another 3.

And no, 20 isn’t great, but that could have made the difference in the game. Plus, he didn’t turn the ball over. So, I’d call that pretty bright.

by Road Warrior on Dec 14, 2009 4:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Fish,

How is Malcom Floyd a more productive NFL WR than Roy Williams? I understand that Roy hasn’t quite lived up to the high expectations so far but let’s not go overboard here. Malcolm Floyd currently has less catches, yards and TD’s than Roy this year. And the 27 year old Roy Williams career totals are about 4 times higher than the 28 year old Malcom Floyd.

by Luke. on Dec 14, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions  

*We can presume that Tony’s 2 fingers meant 2 seconds. I guess. But even then. … what does it mean? A 90-percent chance of not recovering, a decent chance of all those 2 seconds expiring while the onside bounds about … but yeah, ok, hooray, 2.

Honestly, you’re really nit-picking here just to prove a point that Miles Austin is the lone bright spot on this team. You had an agenda to start with, and stuck with it to make a point, which is fine. I’m sure you can find other things to criticize Tony Romo other than a largely inconsequential finger pointing. I rather doubt there was any malicious and selfish intent to show, “Hey, I got you 2 seconds!”

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Dec 15, 2009 4:52 AM CST up reply actions  

There is a lot of things that need tinkering,

but the first think that I think we need to address is the offensive line. We currently have an offensive line that is full of relatively well-known offensive lineman whose play doesn’t match up with their resumes (pro bowl appearances, etc.). More importantly though, their play is rife with mental mistakes along with an inability to successfully execute power running plays. As a result, Tony is constantly having to bob and weave through the pocket and our running game struggles in really short-line situations. This obviously hampers our offense and really limits exactly what we can do.

Also, for those of you that hate the shotgun, you should perhaps turn your vitriol towards the offensive line. It is their shortcomings that force Garrett to put Romo in the shotgun so that he can actually see the blitzes in the most effective manner (since he can’t trust the offensive line to actually effectively pick up blitzes) as well as give Dallas a chance to run the ball with draws.

Ultimately, these offensive line issues are what I see as the root of this offense’s struggles. They limit our passing abilities, and make it extremely hard to successfully execute those short runs that you need to convert in close games against good teams. Until they are addressed, I am not sure what to expect week to week from this team. What I do know though is that Flozell’s spot is the first place to upgrade and I think the draft (since free agency doesn’t exactly allow too many young, great OTs to hit the market) is the place we must do it (trading up would be just fine with me – especially considering we don’t have a whole ton of needs). After that, I think we need to invest some later draft picks in other line positions and in turn get rid of guys like McQuistan and Proctor that have been on this team for awhile and have failed to do anything significant. Hopefully Jerry will carpet bomb the offensive line like he did the linebacking corp. last year.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 14, 2009 3:35 PM CST reply actions  

I've got to agree on the O-line issues.

Plus, a couple of other points that have been made, but I really do believe them:
*We need more speed on Offense. I love Barber, but if Felix is healthy, I think he needs more carries and at the start of the game. Barber deserves his contract and is a very good player. But, he should be used in the manner that got him that contract in the first place. I think we can all agree that Felix is a huge upgrade to Julius Jones, so why not go back to an old formula that worked for us.
*Continuing on the Speed rant, we need at least one speed WR that the coaches trust to put in the game. Crayton has been a good player for us for a few years, but his solid play has diminished of late and he’s no longer a player that can be termed reliable. If we could pair another speed WR with Miles/Roy, I think we’d have the diverse WR set that you need to truly compliment Romo’s game.
*Time to see what drafting an O-lineman early will look like for us.

by desus32 on Dec 14, 2009 3:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Felix Jones doesn’t get more carries for two reasons: 1) Jones has not shown any regularity on staying healthy, and 2) Jones’ propensity to get hurt gives him less time to practice, thus, we’re seeing more instances of him losing the football in nearly every game now.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Dec 15, 2009 4:55 AM CST up reply actions  

I know it may seem like the season is over, and it is, but there is a bright spot. There are only

three games left with wade phillips at HC. We can look forward to a more competent coach being hired (hopefully). The two most rumored HC names out there are Shanahan and Holmgren. It looks as though Holmgren wants more of a GM role, so that probably leaves shanahan. So, if shanahan is the guy, then think about this, he won two superbowls in denver after taking the job from Wade Phillips. How cool would it be to play in a home game in the superbowl next year?

by just4fun on Dec 14, 2009 4:13 PM CST reply actions  

jerry

i also think jerry the gm needs to take a long look at himself. this dec slide has one thing in common-jerry. i don’t know what he does or says but he needs to butt out more. look at the yankees when steinbrenner was suspended in early 90s they finally righted their ship.

by maxdout on Dec 14, 2009 4:38 PM CST reply actions  

The only thing that will change Jerry is money and attention.

Jerry will changes things if people stop going to the games, stop buying the Cowboy merchandise and Dallas no longer has the great TV ratings . In his mind he thinks he is a great GM not because the Boys win SBs, but the fact that the Cowboys are the most valuable team in the sports world. Jerry loves nothing more than attention and money. The GM job brings attention and the Cowboys bring in the money. Why change it’s all working fine to him.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 14, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Couldn't agree more.....

He doesn’t even mind when they pan him sitting in his box with that dumbfounded look on his face as we’re about to lose another December game. Any attention is good attention… in Jerry’s World.

The sad fact is (while alive) it’s never going to change. This is Jerry’s toy and he’ll play with it how he likes. He really doesn’t care what the average fan thinks.

by Road Warrior on Dec 14, 2009 5:02 PM CST up reply actions  

fan

the hard thing about this year has been that i’m a cowboys’ fan not a jerry or wade fan. i will root for and support dallas no matter what. even if wade stays. i mean i wasn’t happy when they signed to but i’m a fan so what can i do. i will root for and support dallas but unfortunately that will benefit jerry. and i will keep buying merchandise and watching games. i know this helps jerry but i’m not supporting him, i’m doing it in support of the dallas cowboys.

by maxdout on Dec 14, 2009 6:30 PM CST reply actions  

Good analysis; although I do like Wade...primarily because he's Bum Phillip's son,

and somewhat “old school”. But I think that Jerry Jones is completely amoral.
Great story: JJ’d give his eye teeth to be accepted as a member in the Dallas Country Club. He lives a 9 iron shot from the main building. But everytime his name comes up for approval he gets black-balled. His son, Stephen is a member in good standing.

Wharter

by Wharter on Dec 14, 2009 8:00 PM CST reply actions  

coaching staff

please just fire Coach Wade
..he makes me fall asleep when i watch him
and i cant believe that first year coach, Jim Caldwell from Indy, has a 13-0 start in just his first season. *sighs

by pinoyintegrity on Dec 14, 2009 11:03 PM CST reply actions  

Well nothing has really changed in Indy

The offensive structure is intact from Dungy’s reign, and was intact when Dungy took over after Mora. Consistency. (Plus some QB who isn’t too bad)

As far as personality, have you ever watched a Bellichek presser? zzzzzzzzzz…..

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 15, 2009 12:25 AM CST up reply actions  

funny how both Wade and Caldwell have the same coaching personality

the difference between the Colts and Cowboys isn’t coaching, it’s that the Colts players make plays during crucial times of the game, the Cowboys, not so much.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 15, 2009 8:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Caldwell doesn't look like the sta-puft marshmallow man on the sidelines either.

I love you Terry, but Wade can not make these players play for him. They have to know for a fact that Wade’s job is on the line and still they play like there is no consequences for their misteps. If they love and respect Wade that much, they would be making every play possible to ensure his return next year. Even the blind can see that Jerry is in control of this team and that Wade is figurehead at best and scapegoat at worst.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 15, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions  

They do?

First, the offense made the same mistakes its been making for 8 years. And I don’t think the offense is on wade.

We held the Chargers to 10 points the first 50 minutes before Ware went down. I would say they got up to play for him.

I think the reason we don’t look as aggressive as other teams is cause we seem to have a real lack of young blood on the D, and along with that, we aren’t as fast as other teams.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Then the talent that has been hyped for the last three seasons is over-rated.

There are two reasons teams lose.
1. Pi** Poor coaching
2. Pi** Poor talent.
Take your pick and stick with the horse you want. One or a combo of these two statements is very likely true.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 15, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

The talent on the OL and at safety is vastly overrated

Those are our problem areas for sure which really need ungraded if we’re going to become one of the very best teams in the league.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 15, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

uhh.....

we’re 8-5. We’ve been a “winning” team the last 4 years. We aren’t pi** poor anywhere.

We are on a similar talent level imo to philly and the giants (when healthy). If you want to make the argument that coaching has something to do with our close losses, I’d agree with you, but the OL has been subpar in ALL of those losses.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes we are 8-5.

If we win out, I will gladly eat my big ol plate of crow. I just am not going to get sucked in by the all is well we are 8-5 crowd. I let that happen the last two years, and I know how those ended.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 16, 2009 8:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes
Small
Garrett the next Jimmy Johnson...child please!

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker
Small
Making the case for Mark Barron

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui