What's missing?
A few things became evident to me over the last 2 weeks...
1. You cant blame Romo , this year.
2.From a talent stand point, we are as talented as anybody in the league
3 WTF is missing?
Its has to be the intangibles.
The talent is there, as much as everybody bangs on the coaching they are not doing a bad job. At some point you just have to blame the players. Key penalties, missed field goals, missed tackles, a missed block, a dropped pass, it all adds up. The players are not executing. You cant tell me we were not in a position to win(or had a chance to) in any of our losses except Green Bay. The coaches are not perfect but they are good enough to put the team in a position to win every week. The players are just not making plays. If you watched the San Diego game and thought there was a huge difference in talent or coaching, then you watched a different game than i did. San Diego executed better, and made more plays. Period. We didnt loose because Wade sucks, Romo sucks, Ware got hurt, or any other excuse. We just didn't make the plays. We are capable, the coaches put the guys in position, and they have the talent, just didn't get it done. Maybe they are just not winners. And it hurts me to say it, I love this team!! But I have to be realistic. I pray they prove me wrong. It would be the best tasting crow ever!!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think coaching is more than just formulating game plans.
When a team is sloppy in so many areas and makes mistakes so often, that has to be coaching. Even guys like Jason Witten are committing back breaking penalties. I wonder how much they actually go game speed in practice, because they always say they don’t make those same mistakes during the week. But then at game time, the whole team is sloppy, starts slowly, and seems unprepared.
Also, I think there is more to a game plan than just coming up with clever play design. At some point, you have to recognize the talent level of your guys compared to the talent level of their guys, and then design plays accordingly. If your OL is rarely able to out muscle the opposing team, it is not their fault when you continue to call plays calling for them to do so. If your RB’s strength is getting the ball in open space, it’s not his fault when he’s regularly called upon to take the ball up the middle. If your LB is slower than their TE, you need to devise a scheme that doesn’t put him in man to man coverage with no other defenders within 15 yards. Etc.
I could be way off, but as someone else said, either this team isn’t nearly as talented as everyone thinks, or they are poorly coached.
by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 15, 2009 1:08 AM CST reply actions
Leaders
Leaders, accountability, consistant playmakers, and defined players roles.
We need...
A playmaker on offense, preferably at WR.
A playmaker in the secondary, preferably at FS.
Two more mean, nasty O-linemen.
I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?
That it?
I don’t really think getting four new players will solve the teams issues. They’ll help mask them, sure; but its execution that is just really poor at times-inconsistency. I don’t think new players will necessarily solve this teams inconsistency. The way I look at this team, it is more than good enough to make the playoffs and while those four players can make the team better, they probably won’t solve any of this team’s core issues. What will? I don’t really know.
I'm obviously talking about next year.
But this team needs more playmakers if they want to take the next step. I agree with you that they are good enough to make that next step, but the dudes that are here need to play lights out.
IMO, an overhaul is not necessary (personnel-wise), just some tweaking…some difference makers. Miles Austin and Romo are reaching their potential. Now, someone else needs to.
Mike Jenkins and Anthony Spencer are on their way up, now somebody else needs to come in a make plays.
Yes, four players could make a huge difference if they are playmaking upgrades at the skill positions, and can improve the overall play of the big boys up front.
Winning is all the mask you need.
I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 15, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
I got that it was for next season
But we are still a 13-3 team pretty much. I would love to have those players you mentioned along with a new kicker and holder, but I just don’t know if all those players will equal wins in the playoff. I agree they don’t need a complete overhaul, but I just don’t know if addition, addition, addition means superbowl. I think they need to work with what they got first and foremost and try and figure out the problem within first.
by tyhall on Dec 15, 2009 10:13 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
By 13-3 team I meant
We still have most pieces from that team. Sorry for the confusion.
by tyhall on Dec 15, 2009 10:14 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
No prob.
The way I see it is that playmakers (like Felix, DeSean, Hakeem Nicks) can make mistakes, but they will makeup for them via big plays. If a non-playmaker makes a mistake, it dooms the team.
Ever notice how the Cowboys get so stuck in a rut when they turn the ball over? That’s because they don’t have guys who consistently force turnovers on defense, and when they get turnovers they can’t always turn them into points.
Playmakers can break the morale of the opposition and really make a difference on a team. Who knows? Maybe a big play is all the difference in the Broncos game…the Giants game. Those games are ones where just one play could have made a huge difference. Unfortunately, it was the other teams that made them.
I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 16, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions
nailed it Aaron....
Out of those Ive been calling for a playmaking WR forever now….
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
If this is a passing team, then you need more than one.
What happens if Austin goes down, or if he didn’t blow up this season? We’re stuck with possession-type guys who may or may not catch the ball.
I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?
by Aaron Novinger on Dec 15, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions
I don't think it has to be a number one type receiver like Larry Fitz
but I really think we need a guy that can come in as a 3rd receiver or slot receiver and provide a safety valve option similar to Welker or Breaston (for Arizona) by getting off the line very fast and giving Tony easy throws. To me, I still think this guy should be Jacoby Ford out of Clemson. The dude is a track star and gets off the line very well. He could be that safety valve and also provide a deep threat for this offense.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 15, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
Ive been reading about Ford and I'm starting to like him Cowboyfan
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
I watched him in person against GT
and was so impressed that I asked my friend who #6 was like five times. He continually made good plays and was absolutely torturing our strong safety. Plus, he made the catch (over the shoulder) that more or less would have sealed the game for Clemson but they got called for holding and had to punt. Plus, even in the second game against GT, he beat us deep again and the defender prevented the TD by smacking him in the face. Luckily for us, there was no call. Regardless, I really like Ford’s potential due to the fact that he passes the eyeball test and the combine type tests. What’s even more is that he can return punts and kicks. Could you imagine how nice it would be to have a truly explosive receiver and punt returner? Granted, he is not as laterally quick as a guy like Desean, but he would definitely be an upgrade over Crayton.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 16, 2009 1:03 AM CST up reply actions
you hit nail on the head
The players simply aren’t executing during critical times in the game. That has absolutely nothing to do with coaching, thats simply on the players to play better.
Like you said, the coaches are putting them in positions to succeed, they’re just not coming through with plays when they need to.
A great example of this is the long completion to Jackson on 3rd down, when the game was tied and we had good ol mo on our side.
I know Newman was coached how to cover Jackson in that situation, Tony Dungy pointed out the same thing Sunday night, however, Newman simply didn’t make the play when we needed it. That play wasn’t the coaches fault, it was Newman’s fault.
Same with the PI call on Sensi on SD first drive, thats on Sensi, the coaches didn’t coach him to commit that penalty.
In Romo we Trust
It takes both playcalling and execution
In this short article the chargers claim they new what was coming on that goal line stand. Once they saw Barber in there, they knew he was getting the ball. A good coah would know his own tendencies and call something that would exploit the Chargers keying on Barber.
If the defense knows what is coming, as was apparently the case here, it does not matter if the offense executes. The defense has too much of an advantage for the offense to overcome.
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
I have to think the Chargers are full of crap with "we knew what was coming"...
If that’s the case, then they don’t watch enough tape because on that play we lined up Felix behind Barber and there have been at least two instances this year that we faked the Barber dive only to pitch it Felix from that same formation. We have also run a similar play with Barber in the tailback position. It is fair enough for them to say they made the correct guess, but there is no way they “knew” what was coming. Hindsight is 20:20, but if they had watched tape they should have recognized the possibility that the pitch to Felix was coming.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 15, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
wow Terry.....
That play wasn’t the coaches fault, it was Newman’s fault.
Can’t believe you actual agree. Newman has been a problem for 2+ years….the player needs to be demoted in the off season.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
You fail to mention
that Dungy also pointed out the Cowboys coaching woes…But I guess if you pointed that out it would weaken your point?
It's the coaching
Lack of fire, aggression, is on the coaches. Coaches keep their player’s heads in the game. This team needs a new personality, an aggressive one. Won’t get that with Phillips
Are we really that talented?
We need somebody like Ray Lewis on defense, somebody that will knock your head off and hold teammates accountable. We need a better offensive line, one with a meanstreak that doesn’t make stupid mistakes. We need better coaching, a coach who understands how to exploit another team’s weakness. Garrett is stubborn and does not use his players to the best of their ability.
by beautifultyrant on Dec 15, 2009 11:31 AM CST reply actions
"Garrett is stubborn and does not use his players to the best of their ability." x2
It’s clear that he has no idea how to utilize a three back system. They haven’t looked great in the running game since the bye.
x3 I actually think if he could get away from the "stubborn" streak
He would be the best OC we have had in some years. I really like JG, I just have an issue with banging you head against a wall.
I don't think we're as talented as you say
a. no elite safety, which the best Ds usually have. We have peices on D, but we don’t have much depth.
average oline and declining. I think this is talent/age.Coaching ahs something to do with it – every team has holes, and we should have been able to win at least 1 or 2 more of these close games with better coaching. But we’re not as talented as our fans think or the media says. Talent at offensive skill positions doesn’t equate to a great offense.
Coaching
Bill Parcells and his staff couldn’t get it done, and how many experts would put Tuna in the top 10 coaches of all time? This team still made the same mistakes under him. Now granted there are better coaches out there than Wade, but i just think he gets too much of the blame. Tuna too hard, Wade too soft, maybe Holgram, Shanahan, or Cower just right?
The only other issue is this team is built to win now, so you cant make wholesale system or personal changes. The window is only going to be open for so long, then back to the drawing board.

by 




















