Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tottenham's Plans for Northumberland Stadium Approved

Is Miles Austin an elite receiver?

The stats so far this year say he is. While Ranking 10th in the league in yards with 999 and a lowly 27th in catches (59), he ranks right up there in every other meaningful receiving statistic. Let's review.

Touchdowns

Tied for 2nd

1               Vernon Davis                    SF            11         

2              Miles Austin                       DAL        10          

2              Larry Fitzgerald                  ARI         10          

4              Marques Colston             NO         9             

4              Brandon Marshall            DEN       9             

4              Randy Moss                       NE          9             

4              Visanthe Shiancoe           MIN       9             

4              Reggie Wayne                   IND        9             

9              Dallas Clark                         IND        8             

9              Andre Johnson                  HOU      8             

Per catch average (Players with at least 30 catches)

4th overall

1              DeSean Jackson                PHI         18.9

2              Robert Meachem            NO         18.2

3              Hakeem Nicks                   NYG       18

4              Miles Austin                       DAL        17.2

5              Vincent Jackson                SD           17.1

6              Devery Henderson          NO         17

7              Kenny Britt                         TEN        16.9

8              Pierre Garcon                    IND        16.6

9              Mike Wallace                     PIT          16.6

10           Jerricho Cotchery             NYJ         16.4

20+ yard receptions

Tied for 1st

1              Miles Austin                       DAL        17

1              Marques Colston             NO         17

1              Reggie Wayne                   IND        17

2              Randy Moss                       NE          16

2              Santonio Holmes              PIT          16

2              Andre Johnson                 HOU      16

2              Antonio Gates                   SD           16

3              DeSean Jackson                  PHI         15

3              Sidney Rice                         MIN       15

3              Donald Driver                    GB          14

40+ yard receptions

Tied for 3rd

1              DeSean Jackson               PHI         9

2              Andre Johnson                 HOU      7

3              Miles Austin                       DAL        6

3              Randy Moss                       NE          6

3              Sidney Rice                         MIN       6

4              Steve Smith                        CAR        5

5              Marques Colston             NO         4

5              Donald Driver                    GB          4

5              Vincent Jackson                SD           4

5              Jerricho Cotchery             NYJ         4

Now do these stats prove he is an elite receiver? Maybe. They do show that he is a big play receiver. Considering that he has done this in 9 starts so far this season is even more impressive. Add to this 74.1% of his catches go for 1st downs and you have a budding star. So much is said about the lead time to develop receivers in this league and you really don't know what you have until the 3rd or 4th year. Well this is Austin's 4th year.  I think we know what he is now.

Now for the real question. What is Austin worth? He is signed to a 1 year restricted free agent deal worth $1.545 million. We already have a big ticket receiver in Roy Williams. Can the Cowboys afford to pay Austin #1 receiver money? Ones usually bank between 10 & 12 mil a year. I don't see the Cowboys being able to pay that kind of money. Would Austin take a good ole boy discount? Would the Cowboys consider franchising him and trading him for picks? Does Roy Williams have any trade value? Would the Cowboys even consider taking the cap hit that would come with Roy not being on the team next year?

These are all tough questions, but the bottom line is this is a good problem to have.  With all the doom and gloom lately I thought it might be nice to focus on our own little gem at receiver.


Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 112 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't worry as much about Austin's productivity

As I do about his health. He’ll be a RFA next year, and I expect we’ll slap the highest possible tender on him (transition tag for 1st and a 3rd, or maybe even a franchise tag which would equate to 2 firsts).
If he can demonstrate through next year that his injury issues are behind him, Austin will get paid.

by Conjunction on Dec 15, 2009 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

no way

i’m going to go ahead and say there is no way you guys get a 1st and 3d for austin. this is his first season and a short one at that. you can not argue the numbers, but you can argue that it is too small of a sample size to expect anything more than a second for austin… keep in mind, not every owner is jerry jones.

Eagles.

by #1EaglesFan on Dec 16, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Plenty of players have done less

in one season and been pursued like nobody’s business in the off-season…Austin will be wooed unless Jones makes his move first.

by DavidH22 on Dec 16, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Austin is good, no doubt...

But when I think “elite,” I think Larry Fitz, Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne, etc.

Miles Austin is not on that level.

by JimmyK on Dec 15, 2009 10:58 AM CST reply actions  

Austin numbers are that of many of the best receivers in the league.

Yet he has started only a little over half the season. Is he having an elite season as a WR? Ofcourse he is stats wise. Is he a elite receiver at this point? No, not even close to this point. IMO an elite reveiver is a game breaker all on his own and established himself as that for more than a few years. One or two good years is promising but you have to establish yourself more. Austin is more the level of Jackson and others that are young , seem to be on the path to promising careers but haven’t played long enough to jump to the next level.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 15, 2009 11:06 AM CST reply actions  

I agree

If he can duplicate these number for another season, he will be in the same conversation as Fitz and Andre Johnson.

by Impatient on Dec 15, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

+1

But I’m quite optimistic on it happening.

by tyhall on Dec 15, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I think he's a BIG Play receiver (at the moment)

He’s working on being Elite if he keeps this up season to season. I like where this is going because he’s a big receiver but he has the talent to take it to the house. I’d like Roy to become the receiver he’s supposed to be (I think he’s slowly getting there) but I’d like to see a wild horse come outta the shadows and emerge as a viable option…Jesse Holley. My be a little premature but with this season on the practice squad and a full training camp why not? He’d compete for that 5th receiver spot with Ogletree or maybe some shuffling around happens and Olgetree, Hurd and Holley have a battle for roster spots. There’s also the draft but I think we have more pressing needs now that Austin is emerging… ;)

God 1st, Family Always & Dallas Cowboys 4 Life!!!!!

by CodeNamedG on Dec 15, 2009 11:07 AM CST reply actions  

Austin is on the verge...

huge production and consistency make an elite receiver. How did he do against Champ, Woodson, and Rogers? When he has big games agianst big time corners, he will truly be eltie.

by beautifultyrant on Dec 15, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions  

Wel...

The Cowboys played Denver before Austins “breakout” the next week at KC.

At Green Bay he had 1 catch for 20 yards, but no one had a good game that week.

Are you considering Carlos Rogers an elite corner?

Austin did put up 7 catches for 145 yards against Oakland who possesses the best corner in the league.

by Impatient on Dec 15, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions  

Its rare that any receiver goes against one corner every play

Even the top flight receivers usually dont get shadowed unless there is a glaring mismatch

by Impatient on Dec 15, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep.

Just watched the Milers Austin highlights for that week. He did have one big play against Asomaugha (his first catch for like 49 yards), but the rest of his catches were against Charles Johnson. The Cowboys picked on Johnson all day – even Roy’s TD came when Asomaugha was lined up on Austin for a change and Johnson lined up on Roy.

by DannyWhite on Dec 16, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I think that he's getting there

maybe by this time next year, hell be there, but right now in terms of being a receiver, I have him on the 2nd tier with young guys like Jackson, Rice, Sims-Walker…

After Fuentes blows a save and an Angels loss to the Indians:
"Angels still in first place" - UCI Halo
"Hey you know who would have gotten those 3 outs in the 9th?
Darren O’Day." - FirebatM3
LOL

by MayurP on Dec 15, 2009 12:33 PM CST reply actions  

I'd give Austin some more time before calling him "elite"

I’d like to see him dominate some more…but otherwise none us of could be any happier with his production. Freaking ecstatic…

by DavidH22 on Dec 15, 2009 12:53 PM CST reply actions  

seriously

I don’t really care if hes elite right now, hes been exactly what we need. If this line gave romo time, we may see him completely explode.

by foyesboys on Dec 15, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Elite is too strong because I honestly reserve that for the top-5 or so guys

but he certainly is working his way up. What gives me the most hope is that the last few weeks he has made plays throughout the game with a consistency much more like a number one receiver is expected to. This is in contrast to the GB and Washington games where he disappeared for stretches at a time and the offense as a whole struggled. Going forward, I think he has a real chance to continue to get better and become a very good to elite receiver in this league as he further learns the nuances of playing every down.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 15, 2009 2:38 PM CST reply actions  

put away that anointing oil, as BP would say. lets see his numbers in the playoffs.

by DavidLaFleur on Dec 15, 2009 3:39 PM CST reply actions  

Depends what your definition of elite is

Like Romo, Austin has been putting up elite numbers and in all probability will continue to do so.

If your definition is the upper 25% of the league, then yes he is elite.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 15, 2009 4:06 PM CST reply actions  

I think Miles is top 10

Nothing wrong with that, considering he is 1st time starter..

He commands a double team and opens up the field for the passing game. I wish threw him more bombs. He could strech the field even more.

He is a WR you can build around.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 15, 2009 7:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Upper 25% is not elite

Austin is a very good receiver and in the top 25% of starting receivers (2 starting WR*32 teams =64 * 25% = top 16) but I think top 4 at your position makes you elite, meaning we are talking about Fitzgerald, Moss, A. Johnson, and R. Wayne. But it’s all subjective.

by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Dec 15, 2009 4:32 PM CST reply actions  

Moss may have been elite at one time

But every week it becomes apparent that he is a after thought and almost irrelevent
ha can be easily frustrated

by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 16, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Why

is it that every time there’s a fanpost that blows up …. Dawk’s ALWAYS in it? ha.

by Dub_TC on Dec 15, 2009 5:51 PM CST reply actions  

Bye Dawk successfully hijacked another threat.

Great post, sir.

Not too many receivers I’d take over Austin right now. Desean Jackson certainly isn’t one of them.

I’m still worried about getting the guy resigned. Jerry needs to lock the guy up long term yesterday. I don’t like the idea of just franchising him or what have you. Just pay the kid what he’s worth(and that’s a lot.) and be done with it.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Dec 15, 2009 8:31 PM CST reply actions  

nah its been a good convo for sure but he

didn’t do anything to it but give his opinion like the rest of us.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 15, 2009 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Gotta give Bye Dawk credit for defending his player so vehemently...

As for the argument, I think it is pretty darn close to a toss-up as they are both great players currently.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 15, 2009 10:33 PM CST reply actions  

Stop it with the rational thinking!

You could derail this whole post with your sanity.

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 17, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought this was just a Austin thread

and not another pissing match between Cowboys fans and a Eagles fan. Personally each player you have to account for in a game, Jackson does have a slight edge only because of his punt return abilities, I would say that Austin has a slight edge as a pure WR but Jackson’s PR ability brings him in front of Austin by a little. Both are very good receivers and we will get to have this pissing match for a long time. I don’t think his small stature will affect him too much, his agility is off the charts so as long as he doesn’t get his bell rung too much he should be fine, I will say that Jackson has a higher probability of missing a game or 2 a year but even w/ that Jackson would still be just barely above Austin in overall what he brings to a team…right now that is

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Dec 16, 2009 2:15 AM CST reply actions  

Jackson's size could be an issue

I have no doubt that he is a spectacular player, but how many players his size have had long careers in the NFL? I guess he sort of reminds me of the Marks Brothers in Miami, Duper and Clayton, who each had pretty long and productive careers. So we’ll see…

by DavidH22 on Dec 16, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions  

how many players his size have had long careers in the NFL?

Another question could be… “How many people his size have even played in the NFL?”

And yet another question (for everybody)… “How many examples can you point of smaller players that had their NFL careers cut short because their smaller frames couldn’t handle the abuse?” I know I can name dozens of bigger players where that’s the case. But seriously, if anyone can think of a few, I’m all ears.

by JimmyK on Dec 16, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

As a saint fan

We are lucky to be blessed with many good recievers and because of that i dont believe any will be considered elite
Miles Austin has stepped up and done what the Cowboys needed him to do it doesnt matter his size his speed or any of the other things people think an elite reciever needs
There is no doubt he is the person you can not leave un-checked on the Cowboys offense
He is the person that always needs to be accounted for or he will burn you
If that dont make him an elite reciever I’m not sure what will
So yes he is an elite reciever in the same fashion as Wes Welker

by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 16, 2009 9:48 AM CST reply actions  

I'd take Austin over Jackson in a heartbeat.

In 4 less games as a starter Austin has more TDs, more yards, more catches, and has a YAC 1.2 yards greater. Why is there even a debate? Jackson is a helluva punt returner, but as a WR he’s strictly a go-deep guy. That’s fine, but it means he’s one-dimensional and not as valuable as someone who can both make the tough catch in traffic as well as break a short pass into a long score.

The YAC comparison is particularly noteworthy. Jackson leads the league in 40+ yard catches, and has both fewer catches and yards than Austin, so the fact that he has a significantly lower YAC shows that most of Jackson’s big yardage comes from deep throws. And again, that’s fine, but it’s less valuable a skill than someone who can take a 10 yard out, break two tackles, and turn it into a 60 yard TD, IMO.

by DannyWhite on Dec 16, 2009 5:43 PM CST reply actions  

As for Austin, if you pro-rate his stats from his 9 games as a starter...

to the the 13 games that pretty much everyone else has played, he’d have 77 catches for 1326 yard and 10 scores. (and yes, I subtracted out the stats for his first 4 games before running those numbers). That’d be 1st in yardage and TDs and tied for 8th in catches (with JW no less). Pro-rating those numbers as a starter to a full 16 games, you’re looking at 94 catches, 1632 yards, and 16 scores. That would be among the all-time great single seasons for a WR (up there with Moss in 03 and 07, Harrison in 02, and Fitzgerald in 05).

As it is, he’s on pace this year, even with 4 games where he didn’t start, for 76 catches, 1305 yards and 13 scores.

I don’t know if Austin is an elite WR or not, because I think you have to prove it over a period of time instead of one great year. But he has elite size, strength, and speed for a WR, and he’s putting up elite numbers this year. So he’s definitely looking the part.

As it is, he’s on pace for 76 catches

by DannyWhite on Dec 16, 2009 6:03 PM CST reply actions  

I love when people "pro-rate" stats.

It’s ridiculous. Giants fans were doing that with Domenik Hixon this preseason, by taking the numbers from games he started and projecting them over a 16 game season. I remember them trying to make the argument that Hixon was better than Jackson, which was replete with ridiculousness.

In fact, here it is…

http://www.bigblueview.com/2009/5/16/877157/whos-better-domenik-hixon-or

Read that thread, and note how silly that looks now.

Stats are nice – They’re nice indicators of a player’s performance, but it’s not the be-all, end-all (and here’s where I’ll also note that Austin’s stats aren’t even better anyway). But come on guys, at some point, don’t you have to just look at the 2 players and see who’s clearly the better player?

by JimmyK on Dec 17, 2009 8:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Why has this turned into a debate about Jackson vs Austin?

This was supposed to be about one of the positives in the Cowboys roster and has degarded into a debate about who is better, Jackson or Austin.

Let me put it this way. Would you draft Jackson in the second round or take Austin as UDFA? Take a look at risk vs reward and you take Austin all day long. Sure Jackson has turned in an above average return for a second round pick but Austin has turned in and other worldly effort as a geek off the street.

by Impatient on Dec 16, 2009 7:57 PM CST reply actions  

To be fair, you were actually the first person to bring up DeSean Jackson, at Dec 15, 2009 6:21 AM EST.

by JimmyK on Dec 17, 2009 7:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Hit "post" too early

Miles is almost elite. So is Desean.

I have no clue how this thread got hijacked, or why Boys fans complied with the hijacking, but regardless. . .

Both still have stuff to prove.

Miles will get a huge deal soon — he won’t be on the market at all. JJ will NOT let Miles go.

For me, I don’t care about Jackson. Sure, he’s good. Sure, he plays for a team in our division. But this ain’t the Eagles’ blog. Go over there to discuss him

This is about Miles. Show him some respect, hm?

by dfan77 on Dec 17, 2009 6:03 AM CST reply actions  

Jackson is the most explosive WR in the league right now thats why...

I dont think there is any CB that can run with him stride for stride….for what he can do as a WR and returner gives him the edge over Austin…. And yes, if you all remember Austin was a kickoff returner. He was decent, but not great. Jackson has at least 3 or 4 TDs from returns I believe and has come close from to getting a couple of more. I dont have the stat, maybe BD can say how many.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 17, 2009 9:36 AM CST reply actions  

He has 2 this year, 1 last year as a punt returner. He doesn’t do kick returns (and shouldn’t) – too dangerous. What’s more remarkable is his return average – just under 18 yards per return, not to mention the many punters that have just kicked the ball out of bounds and given the Eagles good field position.

Also worth noting is his 125 rushing yards and 1 TD on 8 carries (a 15.6 average per carry).

by JimmyK on Dec 17, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Jackson as a WR/Punt Returner? Eh...

Give me Bob Hayes in the late 60s any day…

by DavidH22 on Dec 17, 2009 11:57 AM CST reply actions  

Yes.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 17, 2009 2:08 PM CST reply actions  

I can see the string of "no"s or non-responds...

but what about Steve Smith? Is he elite?

He’s got more receptions and yards than Austin and Jackson…so..no? Yes?

None of these 3 got a big sample size, Austin’s not even a full season, Jackson’s got 2 years and Smith was injured year one, behind Plax and Toom year 2..now, 2nd in the NFC in rec. and yards.

So…still no?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 17, 2009 10:54 PM CST reply actions  

I'd call them up-and-comers or rising stars

Not elite. Elite is more of a club that you have to pay your dues over several years to get into.

by Joon on Dec 17, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

agree...

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Right… still no, but I don’t think Jackson or Austin are elite receivers yet either. It all depends on what your idea of the word "elite means, but when I think "elite," I think Larry Fitz, Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne, etc.

Steve Smith is great of course and he can play for my team any day, but he’s not at the level of the guys above.

by JimmyK on Dec 18, 2009 8:38 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd say Steve Smith of Carolina would be considered more "elite"

than Steve Smith of Giants. That’s not taking anything away from SSNYG, but the numbers and years of production aren’t comparable. But SSNYG is getting there, that’s for sure. If he played the Cowboys every game he’d surpass Jerry Rice!

I had forgotten how the Original Steve Smith was a great punt returner in his early days…and is a great sucker puncher too, I hear.

But SSNYG is more of a possession receiver than a “big play” guy as compared to Austin and Desean, no? Either way, the NFC East has some great young receivers, that’s for sure. Maybe even Devin Thomas will develop as well…

by DavidH22 on Dec 18, 2009 8:28 AM CST reply actions  

he's used more as a possesion guy

than Austin and Jackson, that’s for sure.

But he also makes big plays too..he’s not all 5-10 yard routes on 3rd down.

I’m thought of him more as a young Keenan McCardell.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd say he's closer to Austin...

but Austin makes more people miss…that’s why he gets those big gainers.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes
Small
Garrett the next Jimmy Johnson...child please!

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker
Small
Making the case for Mark Barron

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui