Is Miles Austin an elite receiver?
The stats so far this year say he is. While Ranking 10th in the league in yards with 999 and a lowly 27th in catches (59), he ranks right up there in every other meaningful receiving statistic. Let's review.
Touchdowns
Tied for 2nd
1 Vernon Davis SF 11
2 Miles Austin DAL 10
2 Larry Fitzgerald ARI 10
4 Marques Colston NO 9
4 Brandon Marshall DEN 9
4 Randy Moss NE 9
4 Visanthe Shiancoe MIN 9
4 Reggie Wayne IND 9
9 Dallas Clark IND 8
9 Andre Johnson HOU 8
Per catch average (Players with at least 30 catches)
4th overall
1 DeSean Jackson PHI 18.9
2 Robert Meachem NO 18.2
3 Hakeem Nicks NYG 18
4 Miles Austin DAL 17.2
5 Vincent Jackson SD 17.1
6 Devery Henderson NO 17
7 Kenny Britt TEN 16.9
8 Pierre Garcon IND 16.6
9 Mike Wallace PIT 16.6
10 Jerricho Cotchery NYJ 16.4
20+ yard receptions
Tied for 1st
1 Miles Austin DAL 17
1 Marques Colston NO 17
1 Reggie Wayne IND 17
2 Randy Moss NE 16
2 Santonio Holmes PIT 16
2 Andre Johnson HOU 16
2 Antonio Gates SD 16
3 DeSean Jackson PHI 15
3 Sidney Rice MIN 15
3 Donald Driver GB 14
40+ yard receptions
Tied for 3rd
1 DeSean Jackson PHI 9
2 Andre Johnson HOU 7
3 Miles Austin DAL 6
3 Randy Moss NE 6
3 Sidney Rice MIN 6
4 Steve Smith CAR 5
5 Marques Colston NO 4
5 Donald Driver GB 4
5 Vincent Jackson SD 4
5 Jerricho Cotchery NYJ 4
Now do these stats prove he is an elite receiver? Maybe. They do show that he is a big play receiver. Considering that he has done this in 9 starts so far this season is even more impressive. Add to this 74.1% of his catches go for 1st downs and you have a budding star. So much is said about the lead time to develop receivers in this league and you really don't know what you have until the 3rd or 4th year. Well this is Austin's 4th year. I think we know what he is now.
Now for the real question. What is Austin worth? He is signed to a 1 year restricted free agent deal worth $1.545 million. We already have a big ticket receiver in Roy Williams. Can the Cowboys afford to pay Austin #1 receiver money? Ones usually bank between 10 & 12 mil a year. I don't see the Cowboys being able to pay that kind of money. Would Austin take a good ole boy discount? Would the Cowboys consider franchising him and trading him for picks? Does Roy Williams have any trade value? Would the Cowboys even consider taking the cap hit that would come with Roy not being on the team next year?
These are all tough questions, but the bottom line is this is a good problem to have. With all the doom and gloom lately I thought it might be nice to focus on our own little gem at receiver.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
112 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't worry as much about Austin's productivity
As I do about his health. He’ll be a RFA next year, and I expect we’ll slap the highest possible tender on him (transition tag for 1st and a 3rd, or maybe even a franchise tag which would equate to 2 firsts).
If he can demonstrate through next year that his injury issues are behind him, Austin will get paid.
no way
i’m going to go ahead and say there is no way you guys get a 1st and 3d for austin. this is his first season and a short one at that. you can not argue the numbers, but you can argue that it is too small of a sample size to expect anything more than a second for austin… keep in mind, not every owner is jerry jones.
Eagles.
by #1EaglesFan on Dec 16, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions
Plenty of players have done less
in one season and been pursued like nobody’s business in the off-season…Austin will be wooed unless Jones makes his move first.
Austin is good, no doubt...
But when I think “elite,” I think Larry Fitz, Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne, etc.
Miles Austin is not on that level.
Austin numbers are that of many of the best receivers in the league.
Yet he has started only a little over half the season. Is he having an elite season as a WR? Ofcourse he is stats wise. Is he a elite receiver at this point? No, not even close to this point. IMO an elite reveiver is a game breaker all on his own and established himself as that for more than a few years. One or two good years is promising but you have to establish yourself more. Austin is more the level of Jackson and others that are young , seem to be on the path to promising careers but haven’t played long enough to jump to the next level.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
I think he's a BIG Play receiver (at the moment)
He’s working on being Elite if he keeps this up season to season. I like where this is going because he’s a big receiver but he has the talent to take it to the house. I’d like Roy to become the receiver he’s supposed to be (I think he’s slowly getting there) but I’d like to see a wild horse come outta the shadows and emerge as a viable option…Jesse Holley. My be a little premature but with this season on the practice squad and a full training camp why not? He’d compete for that 5th receiver spot with Ogletree or maybe some shuffling around happens and Olgetree, Hurd and Holley have a battle for roster spots. There’s also the draft but I think we have more pressing needs now that Austin is emerging… ;)
God 1st, Family Always & Dallas Cowboys 4 Life!!!!!
Austin is on the verge...
huge production and consistency make an elite receiver. How did he do against Champ, Woodson, and Rogers? When he has big games agianst big time corners, he will truly be eltie.
by beautifultyrant on Dec 15, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions
Wel...
The Cowboys played Denver before Austins “breakout” the next week at KC.
At Green Bay he had 1 catch for 20 yards, but no one had a good game that week.
Are you considering Carlos Rogers an elite corner?
Austin did put up 7 catches for 145 yards against Oakland who possesses the best corner in the league.
austin wasn't going agaisnt asomugha most of that game
though he did burn him badly once..maybe twice.
Its rare that any receiver goes against one corner every play
Even the top flight receivers usually dont get shadowed unless there is a glaring mismatch
the large majority fo that game
asomugha was on roy.
Yep.
Just watched the Milers Austin highlights for that week. He did have one big play against Asomaugha (his first catch for like 49 yards), but the rest of his catches were against Charles Johnson. The Cowboys picked on Johnson all day – even Roy’s TD came when Asomaugha was lined up on Austin for a change and Johnson lined up on Roy.
I think that he's getting there
maybe by this time next year, hell be there, but right now in terms of being a receiver, I have him on the 2nd tier with young guys like Jackson, Rice, Sims-Walker…
After Fuentes blows a save and an Angels loss to the Indians:
"Angels still in first place" - UCI Halo
"Hey you know who would have gotten those 3 outs in the 9th?
Darren O’Day." - FirebatM3
LOL
I'd give Austin some more time before calling him "elite"
I’d like to see him dominate some more…but otherwise none us of could be any happier with his production. Freaking ecstatic…
Elite is too strong because I honestly reserve that for the top-5 or so guys
but he certainly is working his way up. What gives me the most hope is that the last few weeks he has made plays throughout the game with a consistency much more like a number one receiver is expected to. This is in contrast to the GB and Washington games where he disappeared for stretches at a time and the offense as a whole struggled. Going forward, I think he has a real chance to continue to get better and become a very good to elite receiver in this league as he further learns the nuances of playing every down.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
Depends what your definition of elite is
Like Romo, Austin has been putting up elite numbers and in all probability will continue to do so.
If your definition is the upper 25% of the league, then yes he is elite.
In Romo we Trust
I think Miles is top 10
Nothing wrong with that, considering he is 1st time starter..
He commands a double team and opens up the field for the passing game. I wish threw him more bombs. He could strech the field even more.
He is a WR you can build around.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
Upper 25% is not elite
Austin is a very good receiver and in the top 25% of starting receivers (2 starting WR*32 teams =64 * 25% = top 16) but I think top 4 at your position makes you elite, meaning we are talking about Fitzgerald, Moss, A. Johnson, and R. Wayne. But it’s all subjective.
by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Dec 15, 2009 4:32 PM CST reply actions
Interesting, 50 % of your elite is from the U..used to be QB U...
oh and don’t forget all of the #1 RBs from the U…
Moss may have been elite at one time
But every week it becomes apparent that he is a after thought and almost irrelevent
ha can be easily frustrated
by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 16, 2009 10:03 AM CST up reply actions
Bye Dawk successfully hijacked another threat.
Great post, sir.
Not too many receivers I’d take over Austin right now. Desean Jackson certainly isn’t one of them.
I’m still worried about getting the guy resigned. Jerry needs to lock the guy up long term yesterday. I don’t like the idea of just franchising him or what have you. Just pay the kid what he’s worth(and that’s a lot.) and be done with it.
Epic Fail since 1985
nah its been a good convo for sure but he
didn’t do anything to it but give his opinion like the rest of us.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Gotta give Bye Dawk credit for defending his player so vehemently...
As for the argument, I think it is pretty darn close to a toss-up as they are both great players currently.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
Stop it with the rational thinking!
You could derail this whole post with your sanity.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 17, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions
I thought this was just a Austin thread
and not another pissing match between Cowboys fans and a Eagles fan. Personally each player you have to account for in a game, Jackson does have a slight edge only because of his punt return abilities, I would say that Austin has a slight edge as a pure WR but Jackson’s PR ability brings him in front of Austin by a little. Both are very good receivers and we will get to have this pissing match for a long time. I don’t think his small stature will affect him too much, his agility is off the charts so as long as he doesn’t get his bell rung too much he should be fine, I will say that Jackson has a higher probability of missing a game or 2 a year but even w/ that Jackson would still be just barely above Austin in overall what he brings to a team…right now that is
"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards
by nicholas.rodriguez on Dec 16, 2009 2:15 AM CST reply actions
Jackson's size could be an issue
I have no doubt that he is a spectacular player, but how many players his size have had long careers in the NFL? I guess he sort of reminds me of the Marks Brothers in Miami, Duper and Clayton, who each had pretty long and productive careers. So we’ll see…
how many players his size have had long careers in the NFL?
Another question could be… “How many people his size have even played in the NFL?”
And yet another question (for everybody)… “How many examples can you point of smaller players that had their NFL careers cut short because their smaller frames couldn’t handle the abuse?” I know I can name dozens of bigger players where that’s the case. But seriously, if anyone can think of a few, I’m all ears.
As a saint fan
We are lucky to be blessed with many good recievers and because of that i dont believe any will be considered elite
Miles Austin has stepped up and done what the Cowboys needed him to do it doesnt matter his size his speed or any of the other things people think an elite reciever needs
There is no doubt he is the person you can not leave un-checked on the Cowboys offense
He is the person that always needs to be accounted for or he will burn you
If that dont make him an elite reciever I’m not sure what will
So yes he is an elite reciever in the same fashion as Wes Welker
by mississippisaintsfan on Dec 16, 2009 9:48 AM CST reply actions
I consider Colston to be an elite receiver
on the same level as Austin, maybe higher.
I'd take Austin over Jackson in a heartbeat.
In 4 less games as a starter Austin has more TDs, more yards, more catches, and has a YAC 1.2 yards greater. Why is there even a debate? Jackson is a helluva punt returner, but as a WR he’s strictly a go-deep guy. That’s fine, but it means he’s one-dimensional and not as valuable as someone who can both make the tough catch in traffic as well as break a short pass into a long score.
The YAC comparison is particularly noteworthy. Jackson leads the league in 40+ yard catches, and has both fewer catches and yards than Austin, so the fact that he has a significantly lower YAC shows that most of Jackson’s big yardage comes from deep throws. And again, that’s fine, but it’s less valuable a skill than someone who can take a 10 yard out, break two tackles, and turn it into a 60 yard TD, IMO.
As for Austin, if you pro-rate his stats from his 9 games as a starter...
to the the 13 games that pretty much everyone else has played, he’d have 77 catches for 1326 yard and 10 scores. (and yes, I subtracted out the stats for his first 4 games before running those numbers). That’d be 1st in yardage and TDs and tied for 8th in catches (with JW no less). Pro-rating those numbers as a starter to a full 16 games, you’re looking at 94 catches, 1632 yards, and 16 scores. That would be among the all-time great single seasons for a WR (up there with Moss in 03 and 07, Harrison in 02, and Fitzgerald in 05).
As it is, he’s on pace this year, even with 4 games where he didn’t start, for 76 catches, 1305 yards and 13 scores.
I don’t know if Austin is an elite WR or not, because I think you have to prove it over a period of time instead of one great year. But he has elite size, strength, and speed for a WR, and he’s putting up elite numbers this year. So he’s definitely looking the part.
As it is, he’s on pace for 76 catches
I love when people "pro-rate" stats.
It’s ridiculous. Giants fans were doing that with Domenik Hixon this preseason, by taking the numbers from games he started and projecting them over a 16 game season. I remember them trying to make the argument that Hixon was better than Jackson, which was replete with ridiculousness.
In fact, here it is…
http://www.bigblueview.com/2009/5/16/877157/whos-better-domenik-hixon-or
Read that thread, and note how silly that looks now.
Stats are nice – They’re nice indicators of a player’s performance, but it’s not the be-all, end-all (and here’s where I’ll also note that Austin’s stats aren’t even better anyway). But come on guys, at some point, don’t you have to just look at the 2 players and see who’s clearly the better player?
Why has this turned into a debate about Jackson vs Austin?
This was supposed to be about one of the positives in the Cowboys roster and has degarded into a debate about who is better, Jackson or Austin.
Let me put it this way. Would you draft Jackson in the second round or take Austin as UDFA? Take a look at risk vs reward and you take Austin all day long. Sure Jackson has turned in an above average return for a second round pick but Austin has turned in and other worldly effort as a geek off the street.
Hit "post" too early
Miles is almost elite. So is Desean.
I have no clue how this thread got hijacked, or why Boys fans complied with the hijacking, but regardless. . .
Both still have stuff to prove.
Miles will get a huge deal soon — he won’t be on the market at all. JJ will NOT let Miles go.
For me, I don’t care about Jackson. Sure, he’s good. Sure, he plays for a team in our division. But this ain’t the Eagles’ blog. Go over there to discuss him
This is about Miles. Show him some respect, hm?
Jackson is the most explosive WR in the league right now thats why...
I dont think there is any CB that can run with him stride for stride….for what he can do as a WR and returner gives him the edge over Austin…. And yes, if you all remember Austin was a kickoff returner. He was decent, but not great. Jackson has at least 3 or 4 TDs from returns I believe and has come close from to getting a couple of more. I dont have the stat, maybe BD can say how many.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
He has 2 this year, 1 last year as a punt returner. He doesn’t do kick returns (and shouldn’t) – too dangerous. What’s more remarkable is his return average – just under 18 yards per return, not to mention the many punters that have just kicked the ball out of bounds and given the Eagles good field position.
Also worth noting is his 125 rushing yards and 1 TD on 8 carries (a 15.6 average per carry).
Jackson as a WR/Punt Returner? Eh...
Give me Bob Hayes in the late 60s any day…
Yes.
I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?
I can see the string of "no"s or non-responds...
but what about Steve Smith? Is he elite?
He’s got more receptions and yards than Austin and Jackson…so..no? Yes?
None of these 3 got a big sample size, Austin’s not even a full season, Jackson’s got 2 years and Smith was injured year one, behind Plax and Toom year 2..now, 2nd in the NFC in rec. and yards.
So…still no?
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
I'd call them up-and-comers or rising stars
Not elite. Elite is more of a club that you have to pay your dues over several years to get into.
agree...
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions
Right… still no, but I don’t think Jackson or Austin are elite receivers yet either. It all depends on what your idea of the word "elite means, but when I think "elite," I think Larry Fitz, Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne, etc.
Steve Smith is great of course and he can play for my team any day, but he’s not at the level of the guys above.
I'd say Steve Smith of Carolina would be considered more "elite"
than Steve Smith of Giants. That’s not taking anything away from SSNYG, but the numbers and years of production aren’t comparable. But SSNYG is getting there, that’s for sure. If he played the Cowboys every game he’d surpass Jerry Rice!
I had forgotten how the Original Steve Smith was a great punt returner in his early days…and is a great sucker puncher too, I hear.
But SSNYG is more of a possession receiver than a “big play” guy as compared to Austin and Desean, no? Either way, the NFC East has some great young receivers, that’s for sure. Maybe even Devin Thomas will develop as well…
he's used more as a possesion guy
than Austin and Jackson, that’s for sure.
But he also makes big plays too..he’s not all 5-10 yard routes on 3rd down.
I’m thought of him more as a young Keenan McCardell.
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions
I'd say he's closer to Austin...
but Austin makes more people miss…that’s why he gets those big gainers.
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 9:56 AM CST up reply actions

by 


















