Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

An experiment in ranking

First off, let me start out by saying that I have been reading this blog for a while now and have always enjoyed reading the views that are expressed here so in a way I consider this my first post. I haven't been posting much myself mainly because I haven't found much to put forth in discussions, but I felt that this was something everyone would want to see. A while back  I started an experiment with ranking each team in the NFL, with the idea of taking the schedule of each team and using Excel, creating a rating for each game, and totaling them into a score for each team. My big goal was to create something I felt was fair and would rate each team's performance with as little bias as possible, then I could see how good or bad my boys were in the league.

Star-divide

The system I chose to use to rate each game for each team by using two "scores" for both wins and losses.

First is the opponents wins/losses and second by the strength of victory/loss as compared to the average for that team. So for example, in the Cowboys win over the Raiders in week 12, I would take the wins of the current win/loss for the Raiders 5 and multiply by 15, then to rate how the Cowboys performed compared the the other teams that beat them, I took the average amount that the Raiders loose by which is 19.33, and the amount that the cowboys beat them by which is 17 points, got the percent of 17 into 19.333 which is approximately 87.9% and then added 87.9% of the 5x15 the wins of the Raiders.

Now for losses I would take similar numbers but instead of adding to the total I would take the current losses that team has and put in as a negative and then add in the percent of loss (if the team looses by more that the average loss it would put in a negative number and a positive for less than the average). now to avoid div/0 errors in excel, thank you Colts, I would add 1 in losses( that's why I multiply by 15 to prevent this from effecting the results.

I been running this for a couple of weeks to see how well the results work from week to week. Just a few facts I think everyone would like to know the saints were #2 until the Pats game and the cowboys bounced from the 12th and 8th spot until of course the saints game.

 

 

Rank Team
1 Saints
2 Colts
3 Patriots
4 Chargers
5 Cowboys
6 Eagles
7 Vikings
8 Bengals
9 Cardinals
10 Ravens
11 Packers
12 Texans
13 Jets
14 Giants
15 Broncos
16 Steelers
17 Falcons
18 Dolphins
19 49ers
20 Panthers
21 Titans
22 Jaguars
23 Bears
24 Bills
25 Redskins
26 Seahawks
27 Browns
28 Buccaneers
29 Raiders
30 Chiefs
31 Lions
32 Rams

 

I view these rankings as more of a look at how the teams have performed for this season and not an indicator of how each team is this good or bad.  but to satisfy my curiosity I took a look at how it predicts victories in the next week and since week 10ish(when I started). the rankings has performed at about a 89% accuracy with last week being the worst. but to see how good this works I will post how this is predicting next week. I have a feeling that this will not work well with so many teams vying for playoff spots but lets see anyway.

 

 

Rank Visiting team  @ Rank2 Home team  prediction
3 Chargers @ 21 Titans Chargers
24 Bills @ 17 Falcons Falcons
30 Chiefs @ 8 Bengals Bengals
29 Raiders @ 27 Browns Browns
26 Seahawks @ 10 Packers Packers
12 Ravens @ 16 Steelers Ravens
11 Texans @ 18 Dolphins Texans
22 Jaguars @ 4 Patriots Patriots
28 Buccaneers @ 1 Saints Saints
20 Panthers @ 13 Giants Giants
15 Broncos @ 7 Eagles Eagles
32 Rams @ 9 Cardinals Cardinals
31 Lions @ 19 49ers 49ers
14 Jets @ 2 Colts Colts
5 Cowboys @ 25 Redskins Cowboys
6 Vikings @ 23 Bears Vikings

 

Hopefully I managed to explain how the rankings work well enough. I do look forward for feedback to see if my line of thinking is valid or not in this setup.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 8 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Cool post

Would rec it but I’m on my phone.

Squish.

by Squishmytomato on Dec 23, 2009 5:14 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

I sat on my phone once.

It dialed my number.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 23, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Oooh

I only read btb when I’m pooping, though.

Squish.

by Squishmytomato on Dec 23, 2009 11:28 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Gross

Stay off of my posts!

:-)

"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Dec 24, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

lol

Squish.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 24, 2009 6:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Ranking doesn't mean much to me

I think one of the writers on this blog, Rafael, has a very good measure for pass/fail in playoffs. He takes the defensive rankings and offensive rankings and eliminates teams if they do not fit his criteria. I hope he does his break down before the playoffs start, then you can see for yourself.

If your system works for you, then use it. My personal opinion is match-ups need to be formatted in to create a more honest system. For example if a team has trouble defending the run and is playing a successful run heavy team, it MUST be considered. IMO, the NFL right now, is a pass-happy league, so you have to consider how well a team passes the ball, and how well a defense defends the pass

by spadesking131313 on Dec 23, 2009 7:31 PM CST reply actions  

Good but a lot of work

I find that after about 6 weeks you just start looking at Point Differential and it’s pretty accurate.
Simple, can do it in your head from the paper even (incl. on the toilet Squishy!), and factors in scoring D and O.

Also, won/loss record is a good indicator. :)

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Dec 23, 2009 11:33 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes

Recent FanPosts

97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Small
How The Giants GM Would Fix The Cowboys Overnight ... Good Read Jerrah!!!!
Zzzzwww_small
Twitter GM Mock
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui