Thursday Cowboys Tape Review: Scouting Yourself, and Beating the Other Guy
Last Friday, in the Saints preview, I stressed the importance of self-scouting, to prepare for a coordinator who is one of the best at recognizing and calling defenses to your tendencies:
Williams' fronts look vanilla till just before pre-snap; he gives a lot of base 4-3 looks, then makes a lot of late shifts. He's a streaky game caller, and when he's on, it looks to opposing teams that he's in their huddle. His philosophy is to take away your ten best plays and make you adapt...
For this reason, opponents need to understand what they do, because the Saints will. The challenge then is not to try to make yourself over, but to change your tendencies, so you can still do what you do best, but do it in slightly unpredictable ways. Have a pet play you like to run in the red zone? Run it, but run it outside the 20. Have a play you favor on 3rd downs? Run it on first instead this week.
-- Knocking Off an Undefeated in Six Simple Steps, BTB, Dec. 18, 2009
A review of the Cowboys early touchdown drives shows the Cowboys were prepared for Williams' packages -- completely.
The Wrinkle
The Cowboys struggled against San Diego, and have struggled all year, with simple, off-tackle plays and isolations. Against the Saints, Jason Garrett and Hudson Houck sent an immediate message that things were going to be different.
On Dallas' first play from scrimmage Garrett deployed his unit in the 22 package, two tight ends and two backs, with Roy Williams the lone receiver. He called an off-tackle run for Marion Barber behind a fortified lead blocking scheme: the backs deployed in an offset-I left, meaning Barber was seven yards directly behind Tony Romo and fullback Deon Anderson was lined up four yards deep in the B gap, between LG Kyle Kosier and LT Flozell Adams.
Tight end John Phillips was outside of Adams, giving Dallas a power left look. Before the snap, F-back Jason Witten motioned to a standing position in the C gap, between Adams and Phillips. This means that Dallas had two lead blockers escourting Barber to the left side, rather than the normal one. They also ran this play to the edge of the package, outside of Adams. Isolation plays usually hammer inside, but interior runs are where Dallas has stuttered, while Adams, for all the abuse he takes in the press, remains a stout run blocker.
The power cracked open a nine-man Saints front, creating a seam that Barber hurried through for nine yards. Dallas let New Orleans know that they were going to run for the tough yards from this package any time they wanted to. In fact, Garrett ran this play four more times. He called the exact same play on Barber's three yard touchdown run, which capped Dallas' second drive. He called it twice to the right in the 2nd half and converted third-and-short plays with ease. On the last call, Garrett crossed up Gregg Williams by having Tony Romo fake the handoff to Barber, pivot right and throw a smoke route to Sam Hurd, who spun away from Mike McKenzie for a seven yard gain.
The play was five for five and it's the consistent muscle play this offense has lacked to complement its successful draw package. Look for it more going forward.
Back to the opening drive...
To DavidH22, with love, Jason
Blogger DavidH22 has argued for weeks that the Cowboys have made a fetish of trying to stay out of rhythm, to the point of being rather predictable; they rarely, if ever, run on 2nd down after a 1st down run. Williams obviously noted this tendency because on 2nd-and-1, he took the odd step of inserting his nickel defense, completely selling out for a Dallas pass. The Saints had only two linemen with hands down pre-snap, though one of their ends floated outside opposite Doug Free just before the play, giving the Saints a 3-3-5 look.
Dallas was in a 12 set, with Felix Jones as the lone back, two tight ends and two receivers. TEs Phillips and Witten lined up with Jones in a Packers set, a diamond formation with each tight end in an offset-I fullback position behind each B gap.
Though there is no tight end on the line of scrimmage, Dallas uses this as a running package, and they ran at the overloaded middle of New Orleans' front. At the snap both Witten and Phillips closed to lead Jones to the right, behind RG Leonard Davis. The Cowboys had seven blockers, the Saints six defenders. Both TEs locked on to linebackers, giving Jones a huge running lane. A safety dashed over from the slot to make an ankle tackle, but only after Jones had gained eleven yards.
Hiding Your Weapon in Plain Sight
Two plays later, on 2nd-and-10, Dallas went to a conventional two receiver, two back set, but deployed in a peculiar way. Both receivers were in a slot formation on the right and fullback Anderson was offset to that side, giving Dallas an overload of receiving options. TE Witten, meanwhile, was split wide left, as a wide receiver.
Williams again had his Saints in a 3-3-5 nickel and this time he brought an outside linebacker and a safety off Romo's blind side, while rotating his other two linebackers towards Miles Austin and Deon Anderson on the Cowboys' right.
Witten ran a pattern up the left sideline, clearing out the left flat. The Saints were completely exposed there and Garrett made the perfect call, a quick screen to Felix Jones over the blitzing safety. Andre Gurode got away with releasing downfield early but Felix Jones didn't need lead blockers. He caught Romo's floater and raced up the left sideline for another first down on the Saints' 49.
The Bait and Score
On the following play Dallas went back to the two tight end set with Barber as the lone back,but again presented New Orleans with a twist. Garrett deployed an unbalanced line, with right tackle Doug Free flopping left and lining up next to Flozell Adams. Dallas had three linemen to the left of center Andre Gurode, with blocking TE John Phillips flanking Free. Jason Witten covered RG Leonard Davis, but he was an eligible receiver.
The Cowboys have used this as a changeup formation before, and have run exclusively from it, either off-tackle power plays, or more frequently, a counter with the weakside guard pulling and adding to the overload on the strong side. It's no surprise then that Williams went all out to stop the run, bringing his strong safety up and setting him directly over Phillips, putting eight Saints in the box.
Garrett, however, had called for a deep, two-man route, with Barber and the tight ends staying in to block, giving Romo an eight-man pocket. The safety over Phillips recognized the pass, turned immediately and sprinted upfield to take away the slant and deep in lanes. His pursuit was futile: Miles Austin spun Malcolm Jenkins around with a stop and go move and got five yards behind the rookie Saints corner up the sideline.
New Orleans had Darren Sharper in the deep middle but he was too slow to close. Austin caught Romo's pass in stride and rolled into the end zone after Sharper's dive cut him at the goal line.
Jason Garrett made four key plays where his calls were contrary to the defenses Gregg Williams called to stop him. Williams believed he had Dallas' tendencies mapped out but he was far, far off the trail. Dallas' self-awareness got them big plays and big scores; they had two touchdowns and Tony Romo had over 150 passing yards in the first quarfter. Williams broke up a couple of mid-game drives with blitzes, but Dallas' offense remained one step ahead of the Saints all evening.
More of this please, Mr. Garrett.
53 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First time for everything.
This is the time of the season to pull a rabbit out of your hat Mr Garrett. Glad to see you realize it!
Great Write Up...
I just hope that Garrett can keep it up. He called a great game against the Saints and it will be very interesting to see how he does in Washington on Sunday considering that the Redskins have given him some trouble over the last couple years.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
It was Gregg Williams the DC there the past few years, that Garrett just schooled at NO
He moved from Washington’s DC to NO’s DC in the offseason.
I agree that we need to see much more of this.
raf great stuff as usual
Did you happen to jot down the # plays each WR played?
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account
by Wmillion on Dec 25, 2009 1:20 AM CST via mobile reply actions
No, don't have a tape to review so I don't know the number of snaps that Ogletree played
Curious to see that myself.
Snap counts by WR
Roy Williams 56
Miles Austin 56
Patrick Crayton 25
Kevin Ogletree 9
Sam Hurd 6
Total offensive snaps 77
And Raf, thanks for the freat article. This is why I come back here day after day to get my Cowboy fix. There simple is no other site and writer that delivers analyses and insights like these.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 25, 2009 7:43 AM CST up reply actions
Hey OCC
Can you help me out? I was recently looking for a site I could find snap counts per player per game or per season…or total offensive or defensive snap counts. Sometimes, the numbers don’t match. Do you know somewhere reliable?
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 25, 2009 8:02 AM CST up reply actions
No problemo
Profootballfocus.com has the snap count for every single player on every single team (among other things). Click on the By Week tab, choose the team, click on offense or defense under the team and a hyperlink to the Player Participation Log appears towards the upper right corner of the screen.
Here’s the direct link to the Saints figures. Remember, the site needs between 2-6 days to post the data for the last week.
Merry Christmas.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 25, 2009 8:26 AM CST up reply actions
Thanks much
You know, I can’t seem to find total offensive vs defensive season snaps on that site. Am I overlooking a link maybe? Sorry to be a bother.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 25, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions
You can do two things
look at every single game and sum them up yourself, or select the By Team tab – there you’ll see the total no of snaps for each player, but not the team total snaps. If you take the players with the highest number of snaps (on offense that would be Romo, Kosier and Davis, each with 950 snaps) you should be very close to the total no of snaps.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 25, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions
Thanks again
That’s kinda what I was thinking, but I was hoping I missed something that would be more exact. Asante.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 25, 2009 12:38 PM CST up reply actions
Oh yeah, this goes without saying
More Ogletree please!!
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 25, 2009 8:06 AM CST up reply actions
Merry Christmas to Cowboy fans everywhere, and to everyone in the Cowboys organization. GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
Merry Christmas Everyone!
I am overseas so I got to open my gifts while most are still sleeping but my wife got me an autographed Randy White Jersey and an autographed ball with most of the current Cowboys!!! Awesome presents!!! I am so stoked! Go Cowboys!
Merry Christmas to Everyone at BTB
And I get this Christmas present of another excellent analysis from Raf. I remember way back reading Raf’s stuff and how different it was from everything else out there. Spot on, intelligent break downs to rival what you might see in any NFL coaches meeting.
Thank you, Raf! You deserve an excellent Christmas and I hope you and your family have one this year. Merry Christmas, everybody.
Awesome write up
I love this stuff. Hurray for Garrett’s play-calling, hurray for execution! Let’s see more of both consistently! We dominated the undefeated Saints. We can win any game with this play-calling and execution.
Mele Kalikimaka!
In the Opening Nine Yard Run,
Anderson made a great and punishing block as he lead MBIII into the line.
Anderson's a good blocker
And plays with a ton of attitude and toughness. It seems like every time there’s a mini-scuffle going on between opposing players on the field, he’s always nearby backing up his teammate.
Colombo Is Like This, too.
I notice Free is adopting the same habit.
On that bomb to Austin
Free was lined up outside Flo and made a great secondary block to keep Romo protected for the extra seconds needed to give Austin time to make that double move.
free's position
he looked like a power forward boxing out his guy.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
Free has at least showed that he is going to be a capable fill in guy...
Even if doesn’t ever start, there hasn’t been that ridiculous drop off after Proctor filled in for Kosier last year.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 25, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions
Free
has likely earned himself a starting spot either next year or the year after.
with Flo getting up in age
Free may be the starting LT next year.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
Call me greedy on Xmas morning...
But I want to more games in a row where Garrett flexes his Princeton-educated muscle and not just the occasional brilliant game mixed in among a slew of average ones. I hope he’s got the hang of it.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 25, 2009 8:05 AM CST reply actions
This post is a big reason why I come to this site; it's not just to
talk Cowboys with other Cowboys fans, but to learn. Great write up.
Great to learn the "hows" & "whys" behind what we see during the game.
You’re like Bill Nye the Science Guy for Cowboys football.
Drinking the Blue Kool-Aid since 1980. "Ohhhhhh yeeeaaaaahhhh!"
This is exactly what this offense needed.
Too often the last few years we have played right into the defense’s hand, running exactly the plays they were expecting. We need to not only continue this trend of confusing the defenses, but I say we need to ramp it up even more. By this point in the season, the players know these plays like the back of their hand, so they can certainly absorb some creative mixes.
I had guessed Ogletree was in on at least 10 plays. It was good to see it was close to that number. I know the kid is currently paying his dues while he learns, but he seems to pay dividends too. More of this, as well please.
More Austin, more Felix, more Ogletree, and especially more unpredictability.
The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'
Making the run a priority
Has not been on Garrett’s list of importance. Some people, that have argued with me Vehemently and Venomously, take that statement I always make (Making the run a priority) as turning your back on the passing game. On the Contrary. It has a simpler meaning- mixing our offense better and putting defenses on it’s heels rather than attacking Romo all the time. The running game stiffles the pass rush as much as a good O-lineman does. No running game makes the offense one dimensional, a mistake the coaches can no longer make. They’re job is oin the line.
Garrett has shown tendencies to have a good running game, then go away from it the next game. If he does not mix the offense well, the Cowboys loose- plain and simple.
If Felix can’t run well, go with MB3 and see. If MB3 can’t, try Tashard. If Tashard can’t, try Felix. There should be no favorites in establishing the run. And there should be no doubt as to the importance of establishing it. If the Cowboys get a running back the ball and on track effectively, they win- against anyone.
So much for the theory that the O-line “Sucks at run blocking”. You have to be patient with the running game if it’s not working against a certain defense, not abandon it and drop back more. What the offensive lineman need is to be coached better in the run game, not call less runs and more drop back passes. You have to go into a game with an offensive mindset that the D-line is not going to stop your progress running the ball.
Now the real test- establishing the run against Wash, Phi, NYG, Green Bay, Minn, Ariz, etc. (teams with big & good D-lines).
I believe the Cowboys offensive line IS good enough, but not if you undermine it by calling alot of passes and not alot of runs to begin with. The run should be made the priority, since we already know the Cowboys have a good passing game.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
And keep mixing up formations.
I could only find once, early in the NO game, where Garrett went to the Shotgun for no reason (ie, it was not 2nd and very long or 3rd and long)-
the play got stuffed of course-
the mixing of formations w/Romo under center is also the key, so that the other team can’t tee off when we tip our hand.
Hopefully JG keeps checking in here for tips!
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 25, 2009 3:06 PM CST up reply actions
By the way Larry
That “Snarky” remark I made to Rafael was justified. He has been my biggest critic of actively promoting Tashard as running back. I just thought Tashard has been productive. I would say anything to jumpstart our running game. I am happy even loosing, but I am not happy not even trying to establish a running game. That, to me, is unforgivelable.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Dec 25, 2009 4:32 PM CST up reply actions
Not sure when that was or what comment
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 25, 2009 8:55 PM CST up reply actions
Making run is not a priority....
for a team that has consecutive 200 yard plus games early in the season?
Dallas had success with the power-I THIS GAME. Let’s see if they can maintain it. This is week 15. There’s a reason why they have not done it since week one. It’s not like Hudson Houck doesn’t know how to coach a power running game.
As for ignoring the run, I see Green Bay as the lone example of an extreme run:pass game. And you know, Garrett got roasted for running 14 times in that game, but a funny thing happened this past week.
The Steelers played the Packers and they only ran 17 times the game. But their QB threw for over 500 yards and they won the game. Their receivers didn’t fumble 40 yards up the field and their QB didn’t miss open receivers, as Romo did that week.
Bruce Arians ran the same game plan Garrett did, got better execution from his people and put 37 points on the board.
Funny game that football.
+1
The NFL is a passing league and the best teams are passing teams. Case closed DallasPalace
In Romo we Trust
Case Closed?
The season is not over yet genious. You say case closed when the playoffs haven’t even started. it’s more like “mind closed”, as in yours.
The Cowboys are not a good enough passing team to make it without an effective short running game.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Dec 28, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
My point has been more about not telegraphing the plays by formations
I’d like to see more running, sure, but mostly I think the difference last week was that Romo wasn’t going back into the shotgun for no reason at all, thereby tipping that it was either a pass or draw, and giving the D a big advantage.
Against NO we saw a lot more of Romo dropping back and various 2-back sets.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 25, 2009 9:05 PM CST up reply actions
As running plays go the challenge for this team is running WELL ENOUGH
It ran a power play better this week. But the best running plays were still versions of the draw to Felix Jones. It didn’t matter if it was the shotgun or with Romo under center. The longest runs are still lead draws, and delayed draws.
There’s no crime in this. This team doesn’t run power well and won’t. But it can run them well enough. There’s precedent. The ‘81 49ers couldn’t power run, relying on draws and sweeps and they won a Super Bowl. Last year’s Steelers could not pass block, but they run blocked well enough and won a Super Bowl. The Cardinals didn’t run well at all during the season, then ran decently in the playoffs and got within seconds of taking it all.
Look at the Chargers. They don’t run well. But they pass extremely well and run well enough to keep Philip Rivers upright, so he can dice up secondaries.
There’s a big difference between power running well and running well enough. This team can’t do the former. But it may be able to do the latter. We’re fixing to find out, as Parcells used to say.
I agree w/ all those points
Although in this last game I don’t think the did run from the Shotgun as much
or even use it, except when it’s really called for
and to me that was the difference. I’m just sayin’, make the advantage yours, make the D guess. Don’t tip your hand too much, and all throughout the last game it was more balanced.
Whatever, as long as the offense can keep it up, and the defense can keep playing at their high level!
They’ve put themselves in a position to play games that matter-just like last year.
Romo’s looking much better, and that’s important. No TO, that helps. Let’s hope this year they win out !
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 26, 2009 1:04 AM CST up reply actions
stupid dashes....
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 26, 2009 1:05 AM CST up reply actions
I feel like you're giving dashes a bad rep
They’re fairly handy, y’know.
Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.
by accidental innuendo on Dec 26, 2009 8:58 AM CST up reply actions
Making the run is a priority
when a team has shown it has a problem establishing it in short yardage situations. It’s either that, or be banished to the realm of one-dimensionalism, and that hasn’t worked out so well, has it?
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Dec 28, 2009 1:17 PM CST up reply actions
December plan outlined from the Beginning of the Season?
Is it possible that Garrett has been sticking to certain tendencies during the season to lull opposing Defenses into setting up like the Saints did? If so, its almost like JG has created a new level of play-calling solely for December – a GREAT way to shed the disasters of last few years, huh?
Does anyone know if Coach’s can afford to pop open a new can of plays this late in the season?
What?
Yeah a new startegy- loosing to the point of almost being bounced out of the playoffs AGAIN?
Respectfully, Cal, I hope you are NOT correct.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
by DallasPalace on Dec 25, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions
More of this smitter smatter?
I guess Garrett really is still holding back some of those vaunted specialized plays for Felix until the season finale against the Eagles? Masterful plan. Except, of course, for the part of the master plan that involves still having to claw for a playoff berth in Week 16.
How does the feeble fullback dive on 4th and goal against the Chargers figure into Garrett’s master plan? I guess he’ll look like the genius in the final seconds of the Super Bowl in the same scenario when he calls a fake FB dive to Barber and pitches to Felix instead.
Makes no sense as these guys have stated
16 games, each is too important.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Dec 25, 2009 9:05 PM CST up reply actions

by 





















