Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

NFC Playoffs: The Dallas Drive for 24

The NFC field is set.  The Saints, Vikings, Eagles, Cardinals, Packers and Cowboys are in.  What is not known is the final seeding. 

And that counts. The NFC favorite won't be known until the games are played this week and we know the match-ups.  Because match-ups matter in this parity-addled NFL.  In fact, match-ups have always mattered.  Some quick historical snapshots:

1970 -- Dallas rallies from 5-4 and wins the division at 10-4.  The defense gets hot and carries the team to its first Super Bowl.  Let's consider the role favorable matchups played in the turnaround.  That fourth loss came in the Cotton Bowl on a Monday Night against the then St. Louis Cardinals.  The bloody final was Cards 38, Cowboys 0.

This, weeks after the Cards had spanked the Cowboys 20-7 at home.  Dallas did not match up with St. Louis that year, losing two by a combined 58-7, but the Cards got big headed after that blanking, which raised them at 7-2, and lost their last three games. Their December loss to the Lions gave Detroit the wild card.  Dallas beat them 5-0 in the divisional round.  It's doubtful the Cowboys could have squeezed a win from another rematch against the Cards, given how lopsided the first two games were.

Star-divide

1995 -- The Cowboys finished 12-4 but lost two to the 6-10 Washington Redskins.  They also were spanked by Jerry RIce and the 49ers at Texas Stadium.  Dallas had no answer for a package which put Rice in the slot and set him loose against Cowboys' linebackers and nickel safety Bill Bates.  A rematch looked possible until the 49ers were upset by the Packers, who then lost to Dallas in the NFC Championship Game.  Dallas got the opponent it could handle. 

1999 -- Tom Coughlin's Jacksonville Jaguars rolled through the NFL, winning fourteen behind a top six offense and the league's best scoring defense.  They smashed Jimmy Johnson's Dolphins 62-7 in the divisional round, sending J.J. into his second retirement.  The only team to beat them in their first 17 contests was Jeff Fisher's Tennessee Titans, who won both regular season contests. 

Fisher's Titans looked set for a quick playoff exit, until they stunned Wade Phillips' Bills with the Music City Miracle kickoff return lateral.  They upset the Colts the following week and gave the Jags an upset stomach the following Sunday, beating Jacksonville for the third time.  The Jags were perfect against everybody but the Titans, but it was the Titans they had to face, and so the Jags' Super Bowl dreams vanished.

     *     *     *     *

Let's take a quick look at the match-ups again.  The Giants did the Cowboys a tremendous favor yesterday, flopping in their Giants Stadium finale.  Let's say, just for argument's sake, that the Cowboys were to beat the Eagles next week, while those Giants won out and the Packers lost to Arizona in the desert on the final weekend.

Dallas would likely have claimed the 3rd seed and faced,  drumroll please ... the New York Giants.

I know few people relish a potential rematch against the Eagles in the wild-card round, but that looks far preferable to me than a third clash with New York.  The Giants are Wade Phillips' bogey team this year.  Eli Manning's offense is the only group to top 21 on his defense this year.  The 'Gints did it twice in fact, scoring 33 and 31 points.  Dallas has no answer for Steve Smith at the moment and New York's departure is the best news any Cowboys partisan could see today.

Every team in the NFC field has warts, and the tourney winner will likely come down to which team gets the most favorable road to Miami.  The Cardinals have lots of trouble at home for some reason.  The Packers offensive line has leaked all year and their secondary surrendered 500 yards to Ben Roethlisberger two weeks ago.  The Saints offense has suddenly lost its mojo, scoring 17 in back-to-back losses after averaging 36 points the first thirteen games.  The Vikings are also staggering. First, the Favre/Childress soap opera sucked up all the media oxygen.  Last night, the defense broke down in an overtime loss to the Bears. The Eagles offense has rolled the past few weeks but the formerly stout Eagles D has hemorrhaged points lately.

The Cowboys?  We know their foibles.  They don't power run.  Their protection can break down if you blitz them hard.  Their safeties and inside linebackers are vulnerable against the pass. 

They also have a major strength.  That same defense which could not stop the Giants has stopped everybody else.  They've held the other big-time NFC offenses way below their averages.  The Saints scored 17 against them; the Packers got 17; the Eagles 16 in their first meeting.  The Falcons are the only opponent besides New York to top 20 points since week two.

Dallas' offense can move the ball, but the lack of a power gear means they score less than past teams, despite ranking high in yardage.  I see Dallas following a blue print which worked magically two years ago.  I give you the '07 Giants.  The Super Bowl champion '07 Giants:

Playoff Points Scored

  • vs. Tampa Bay -- 24
  • vs. Dallas -- 21
  • vs. Green Bay -- 23
  • vs. New England -- 17

That's not the record of an offensive juggernaut, but the offense avoided turnovers and coupled their play with a defense which held its opponents to an average of 16.2 points a game.   The Cowboys are averaging just under 23 points a game right now.  Getting to 24 is likely the offense's target.  Dallas has the best defense in the conference and they've matched up with every remaining offense they've faced.  That's a big plus on Dallas' side.

Points Allowed, NFC Playoff Field

Team  Pts./Gm.    NFL Rank  
Cowboys     16.7      3rd
Packers    19.3      9th
Cardinals    19.5     10th
Vikings    20.3     14th
Eagles    20.9     16th-T
Saints    21.2     19th

Comment 174 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Just FYI, Todd Archer gave a quick breakdown of matchups based on week 17 potential results and

I want any one of the scenarios that gets GB to play Dallas; I want dallas to have a rematch against those fudge peckers. I want dallas to start a new tradition of GB QB’s that cannot win in dallas; I want goth rodgers in traction and I want dallas to put that pecker team in a hurt locker and send them home.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Dec 29, 2009 10:04 AM CST reply actions  

Wow!

Tell us how you really feel Cowboy78…

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Dec 29, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

The oline for the iggles is going to be an interesting match-up to see if it give dallas any advantage.

If the d-line of dallas can get more pressure due to this match-up it will help them have a better defensive performance against the iggles and give a better chance to keep the big plays in check.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Dec 29, 2009 10:12 AM CST reply actions  

So

if Philly wins, they get the 2 seed. Correct?

by Dub_TC on Dec 29, 2009 10:21 AM CST reply actions  

Your Sunday should be ...

At 12:00 noon you turn on the Giants @ Minnesota game. Rare to see, but all Cowboy Nation will be rooting for the Blue team. New York and Vikes in a shootout from the onset.

With the Giants taking a 10 point lead after a KO return for a TD, and it nearing 4 o’clock, your heart starts to pudder quicker with anticiapation for the Big Game! Knowing more might be at stake, you get even more pumped up! .. About 15 minutes later, the Fox ticker reads Giants 40 – Vikings 33.

Half-time of our game, and Dallas playing smash mouth defense is winning 17-6. You turn your attention to Arizona, where the Cards are grasping a lead of 21-10 over Green Bay, with the Pack driving right before the half.

Cowboys open the second half with a long 7 minute touchdown drive. Green Bay at halftime down 21-13.

As the 3rd quarter winds down, its Dallas with the ball and an 18 point lead. The Packers making a game out of it in Arizona only down 24-20, with a lot of time left in the 3rd.

Determined to get back in the game, the Eagles drive impressively down the field to cut the lead to 24-13. On the insuing drive, Romo completes a slant to Roy Williams for a first down as Dallas crosses mid-field and is killing clock. While, at the same time Larry Fitgerald grabs a Warner pass to the Green Bay 18 as the 3rd quarter ends, Arizona 24 – Green Bay 20.

The Cowboys run 5 minutes plus of clock and settle for a FG with 6 and a half left to go, up 27-13. Green Bay driving, as Fox game breaks showing Arizona’s Bonzi Wells rushing in for 6 early in the 4th. That score 31-20.

Meanwhile in Big D, the defense is giving up short passes inthe middle of the field as the Eagles cross midfield with less than 4 minutes to go. Seconds later, Spencer sacks McNabb and forces a 3rd and long near Dallas’ 40 yard line.

Touchdown Green Bay!

Dallas holds on 4th down. They have the ball with a 14 point lead and less than 3 minutes to go. A couple of first downs later and its game over … Dallas Cowboys NFC East Champions!

Fox brings us live to Arizona .. Cards with the ball and a 4 point lead with around 5 miutes left. Sack! Sack! Warner fumbles and its Green Bay who recovers. Aaron Rogers leads them right down the field to score with 2 minutes and 17 seconds left. Pack lead 34-31.

Warner regroups and has his team in Packer’s territory with a minute and a half and 1 timeout. After a Woodson pass defense, its 3rd and long at GB’s 31 yard line. Warner gets flushed and incompletes a pass throwing it away on the sideline. 46 seconds remain as Arizona sends out the FG unit ………… Wide right!! Wide right!!!

Cowboys clinch 2nd seed, and we all take one week off!!

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Everything sound reasonable

except this:

Romo completes a slant to Roy Williams for a first down

by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 29, 2009 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

maybe we can use him as a backboard

someone i blue will catch the ball as it bounces off Roy’s frying pans

by freightgod on Dec 29, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually, it sounds like he already did.

"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me

by BStylin Hawkye on Dec 29, 2009 2:11 PM CST up reply actions  

oh ok

i thought he was going to do it during the play

by Panorama on Dec 29, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions  

lmao nice!

"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."

by saidseven on Dec 29, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

oh jeez

someone “in” blue…man, where’s the edit function lol

by freightgod on Dec 29, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Touche'

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Dec 29, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Well ..

I originally had Ogletree in there .. but gotta keep the faith at this point and thought it was a little more satisfying with Roy.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Ogletree would shine if given the chance...

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Dec 29, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

I think ..

each player has a different skill set which they excel at or should. Roy just has not capitolized of his opportunities, but has the size and skill to do so. Getting that slant and back-shoulder throw down will help HUGE in the playoffs.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 1:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Getting that slant and back-shoulder throw down will help HUGE in the playoffs.

and then Santa will bring me a new pony!

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Dec 29, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

This is unrealistic
and settle for a FG

If you are inside the 5, why kick??

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:51 AM CST up reply actions  

No. I believe If Minnesota wins, they get the 2nd seed

regardless of what happens at Dallas vs. Philly. Eagles needs a Minnesota loss or tie and a Philly win to get #2. But who cares about the Eagles? The Eagles Suck.

by Eagles suck on Dec 29, 2009 10:26 AM CST reply actions  

that checks

Ich bin ein Berliner--JFK

by HudBaby on Dec 29, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

btw., the Saints are the worst #1 seed I can recall.

Sure we lost two years ago at #1, but we were a strong team and one dropped pass doomed us. Saints… nuh-uh. They’re just not that good. Their weak defense makes them vulnerable against any team.

And Minnesota? Favre ought to scare no Cowboy. He’s making plays against mediocre defenses, sure, but get a really good rush on the guy and he’ll get hurt and see stars. We beat Minnesota.

I think the challenge in the NFC comes from the bottom of the seeds. Cowboys, Eagles, Packers…

Oh… did I forget about Cardinals? Warner has shown chinks in his armor. And they’ve no running game. And they’ve a pedestrian defense. They are forgettable.

by Eagles suck on Dec 29, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions  

and

if Dallas beats Philly, more than likely they’ll be the 3 seed.

Who owns the tie breaker between the Packers and Eagles?

by Dub_TC on Dec 29, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Really good question.....

They’d both have the same conference record at 9-3. I think it would then go down to common opponents at which point we’d have swept the E-gals while the Pack beat us? It’s gonna come down to something crazy like that (I think).

by Road Warrior on Dec 29, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

If both Philly and Green Bay

lose they would both be 8-4 in the conference.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 4:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Correction

Philly would be 9-3 but i believe G.B lost 2 to Minnesota, one to Tampa and a loss to Ariz would make them 8-4. My bad, sorry ’bout that.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 4:55 PM CST up reply actions  

No worries, it gets really confusing.

I was assuming we beat Philly and GB beats the Cards.

That said, you’d be correct. GB lost 2x to Minnesota and then to Tampa. Given this weeks Philly loss… the E-gals would have lost to us 2x and to the Saints.

by Road Warrior on Dec 29, 2009 5:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah,

I think we are O.K. I guess you were also assuming that Minnesota would beat the Giants because if the Giants beat Minnesota, we beat Philly, and G.B. beats Arizona, we get the #2 seed. Now let me say that again the Giants beat…. never mind.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

If Dallas wins ..

I read somewhere that Green Bay would be locked into the 6th seed.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions  

so if Dallas

wins …. more than likely, it would be:

Saints
Vikes
Dallas
Zona
Eagles
Packers

if Philly wins

Saints
Philly
Vikes
Zona
Packers
Dallas

I think?

by Dub_TC on Dec 29, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

If Dallas wins ..

and Arizona wins with a Minn loss = Dallas 3rd seed & Ari 2nd

and Min wins with a Ari loss = Dallas 3rd seed & Minn 2nd

and Min and Ari lose = Dallas 2nd seed

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Only two ways Green Bay

gets the 6 seed and that’s if Dallas wins and Arizona beats Green Bay. All other scenarios get them the fifth seed since they can’t win the Northern division. If Philly beats Dallas, G.B. is the fifth seed since they own the tiebreaker with Dallas.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 5:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Yahoo! Sports has ..

a playoff scenario break down, and you can change each team’s results for week #17 and see how that effects the playoff picture.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 29, 2009 1:01 PM CST up reply actions  

so

if it goes the way I think it will ….

Dallas would be on the road at Minny
GB would go to Arizona
Philly and NO gets the byes

but that’s cause I had Dallas losing. I always think the Eagles will beat them. Lowered expectations!

by Dub_TC on Dec 29, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

That is not right....

A Philly win gives them the #2 seed regardless of what Minn does against the NYG.

by death of the cool on Dec 29, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Correct

If Philly wins, they are the #2. Period.

There is NO circumstance under which the Boys go to Philly for the first round.

Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)

by mikey p on Dec 29, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

no philly is in the 2 seed right now

the vikings need dallas to win as well as beating the giants to get the 2 seed back

"Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk"

by sprewelllatrell on Dec 29, 2009 11:17 AM CST up reply actions  

Tie???

WTF is that? You can’t tie can you?

Someone look that up for me. I need to get back to my chunky Campbells…

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Let me call McNabb for you,

he must know..

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Dec 29, 2009 12:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope, that's not right.

If Minnesoata and Philly both win than Philly is the #2 seed regardless what Ariz. and Green Bay do. Philly has to lose for Minnesoata to get the 2 seed. If Minnesota loses there is no way for them to get the #2 seed.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 4:47 PM CST up reply actions  

We've also given the Giants more points than any other team this year.

The trend in our losses, with the possible exception of Green Bay, has been the points we give away or leave on the field.

I’m hoping that Garrett now has a firm grip on what we can’t do, and is looking for options.

Our defense does have a trump card it hasn’t played yet, as well. Isn’t it time to start putting Mike Jenkins on the opposition’s No. 1 receiver? Jenkins is our best answer to players like Steve Smith. Somewhere along the line we should probably go ahead and put Jenkins in that role. Who knows, it might actually motivate Newman to raise his game to another level.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 29, 2009 10:28 AM CST reply actions  

Raf, you've been absolutely correct about the defense leading the way for us.

It’s really good to see how well they stack up in the conference.

The offense has actually helped the defense’s numbers, especially against the Chargers and Saints, with some long clock-eating drives. Gotta finish them with points, though, to get the average up to 24.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 29, 2009 10:45 AM CST reply actions  

Cowboys will win the SB if

Romo and the defense continue to play well and it wouldn’t hurt if we could convert a 3rd and 1 once in a while.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 29, 2009 10:48 AM CST reply actions  

WHAT HAPPENED?!

it wouldn’t hurt if we could convert a 3rd and 1 once in a while

You’d think we were the Eagles, or something! I used to sit back and relax on 3 and short… I don’t know if it’s Garrett trying to cute (Which I think he does too often), or a combination of fail amongst the backs/line, but they really have to solve that problem.

by tkosmith on Dec 29, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

It's the OL

I think Garrett kept trying to pound it with MB3 because he knows having a good power running game for the playoffs is important, but eventually we might end up like the Eagles and have to pass on all short yardage situations.

All of our successful running plays are delays or draws, our OL simply doesn’t have the ability to just line up and knock the opposing DL off the LOS.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 29, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Some of those calls

shoulda been QB sneaks. The 4th and inches definitely should have been.

by witten82 on Dec 29, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

I love a little play action in those situations.

We’ve certainly got the TE’s and backs to make a ltitle yardage in the flats.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 29, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Especially on 2nd down and short

there were a couple of opportunities for that.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

i agree

i think we’ll start seeing some play action on those third and shorts… or quick screens to austin, tree or even roy… i’d love to get a third and short early in the game and playaction deep to austin on a deeeeeeep post, that would be an early dagger

by CowboysFan4Life on Dec 29, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

AMEN!!

Im starting to wounder if they dont have a qb sneak in the playbook! Really. one of those 4ht downs was like 3 inches. QB sneak should be the call no matter what

"Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk"

by sprewelllatrell on Dec 29, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Dallas ran a QB sneek last year I think

but I don’t remember seeing even one this entire year

Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden

by BishopWest on Dec 29, 2009 6:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't know about the rest of the year

But against the Redskins, we were in control the whole game, and I wouldn’t want to risk Romo getting hit in the head or something on a sneak. Save that for the playoffs.

by Joon on Dec 31, 2009 2:26 AM CST up reply actions  

i don't want to risk romo with a qb sneak

he’s too important to this offense… i’d rather try some playaction or put choice in there for those short yardage plays, he seems to have a nose for a hole and is quick hitting it

by CowboysFan4Life on Dec 29, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

what about the quick slant to austin

that seemed to work pretty well sunday night. i like that play on 3rd and short. miles catches that slant and he’s gone b/c of the safety being in the box

by BuckeyeICO on Dec 29, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

That would be a better option too

The handoffs to barber were just entirely too slow, and it is usually about push, but it took long enough that the lineman actually had to hold their blocks

by witten82 on Dec 29, 2009 8:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Pitch it

Jeez

Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)

by mikey p on Dec 29, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Didn't This Probem Start

the moment Columbo went down?

"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo

by Far Rider on Dec 29, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I honestly think thats a big part of it

I think running behind Bigg and Colombo, we can always pick up a yard, but Free isn’t as strong or powerful as Colombo.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 29, 2009 4:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Here's the stat line on 3rd and 1 this year

Game 2 versus NYG
3rd and 1 = pass for a 1 yard TD

Game 3 versus CAR
3rd and 1 = run for 7 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 0 yards
3rd and 1 = pass incomplete

Game 4 versus DEN
3rd and 1 = run for 4 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 2 yards

Game 5 versus KC
3rd and 1 = pass for 9 yards

Game 6 versus ATL
3rd and 1 = run for 12

Game 7 versus SEA
3rd and 1 = run for 2

Game 8 versus PHI
3rd and 1 = run for 3

Game 9 versus GB
3rd and 1 = pass for 0 yards

Game 10 versus WAS (FREE starts instead of COLOMBO)
3rd and 1 = run for 2 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 1 yard
3rd and 1 = run for -1 yard

Game 11 versus OAK (FREE starts instead of COLOMBO)
3rd and 1 = run for 1 yard
3rd and 1 = run for 32 yards

Game 12 versus NYG (FREE starts instead of COLOMBO)
3rd and 1 = run for 6 yards
3rd and 1 = pass for 10 yards

Game 14 versus NOR (FREE starts instead of COLOMBO)
3rd and 1 = run for 2 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 4 yards

Game 15 versus WAS (FREE starts instead of COLOMBO)
3rd and 1 = pass for 8 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 0 yards
3rd and 1 = run for 0 yards

When Colombo was starting at RT (Games 1-9)
Dallas ran the ball on 3rd and 1, seven different times and only failed to convert once

When Free was starting at RT (Games 10-15)
Dallas ran the ball on 3rd and 1, ten times and failed to convert on three of those; however, before the WAS game last Sunday the stat line would have been 8 times running on 3rd and 1 and failing to convert only once.

My opinion is that WAS just had our number on 3rd and short for whatever reason. I think Free and Colombo have both been blocking pretty well in 3rd and 1 situations throughout the year.

Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden

by BishopWest on Dec 29, 2009 7:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I Meant Problem

"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo

by Far Rider on Dec 29, 2009 10:59 AM CST reply actions  

No, this problems has been around for years

They were awful at power runs last year and the trend continues.

BTW, last year’s D gave up 22.8 ppg. At 16.7, Wade has his guys almost a touchdown better.

That’s huge.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 29, 2009 10:59 AM CST reply actions  

Wow, that's an impressive stat.

And a lot of it has to do with the personnel changes they made last offseason, I think.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 29, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

right

Olshansky, Brooking and Sensabaugh were not sexy signings but each of them was a solid upgrade over the guy they replaced. It adds up.

Mix in Mike Jenkins playing MUCH better than Anthony Henry, Newman rounding back to his old form (see OCC’s fan-post on this) and Spencer ’09 being better than Spencer ’08 (is anybody even thinking about Greg Ellis now?) and you have a much, much better defense.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 29, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions  

I'll add Spears is playing better this year than before

Dallas has improved at 7 positions this year. Ware and Ratliff are their excellent selves. James is about the game, steady but not great and the one iffy spot is free safety.

Which tells me, they’re gonna be looking FS again high in the draft next year.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 29, 2009 11:17 AM CST up reply actions  

The Defense is truly carrying this team

which is why a first round bye would be excellent.

Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)

by mikey p on Dec 29, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

is it me or...

has our defense been MUCH improved since hamlin returned?

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I think his return has definitely contributed to the improvement.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 29, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Right

I was going to add Jenkins’ improved play.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:55 AM CST up reply actions  

check out OCCs recent fanpost on stats

Newman has been pretty good the 2nd half of the year statistically

by Sean N on Dec 29, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

do these stats include missed & unattempted tackles??

because he is still doing that – counted at least 3 whiffs vs Redskins….

and the pick was a gimme

by McLovin9 on Dec 29, 2009 1:09 PM CST up reply actions  

3 whiffs

on a player that makes MANY whiff. The redskins only offense was a quick out to santana, Newman was playing so he wouldn’t get beat deep. He did his job.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

he used to be very good against the run

Hes somewhat declined, hes no asante samuel even now though lol.

by foyesboys on Dec 31, 2009 5:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Wait isn't our defense playing better because t.o. Is gone?

That’s what some people on here seem to believe.

by houseofprime on Dec 29, 2009 4:36 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

there are many factors in that

drastically improved special teams and an offense that is rarely turning it over are helping.

Of course, Wade’s D is flat out better too.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

It seems as if our short-tardage plays

take a while to develop. Even if there is an initial hole, it closes because the back is taking the handoff so deep or it’s just taking the back so long to get to the point of attack. In one case last week, Barber missed what appeared to be a hole between C/LG when he went right. Haynesworth blew up another. Against SD, looks like their lineman submarined our OL, giving LB’s free shots at teh RB’s since no blocker was getting to the 2nd level.

Whatever it is, appears we need more quick hitting plays before the D can react and flow to or cut off the play. Dives, quick tosses, etc

Always be more than you appear and never appear to be more than you are

by tdships on Dec 29, 2009 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

In that case,

it would probably help to run some of those run plays from passing formations. At least the defense can’t put ten men at the line of scrimmage if we threaten pass.

by jevans1729 on Dec 29, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Line Free up as fullback and run him up the middle.

after all he’s quick on his feet. :>)

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 11:03 AM CST reply actions  

Wasn't Doug Free

a Tight End when he first got to college? If he can up his strength, he could be a top LT. Ugh….if only we hadn’t given up our first pick last year, we could have gotten Oher…..sigh

by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Dec 29, 2009 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep. I was half kidding about Free at FB,

but a 300 LB man that’s fairly quick is hard to stop for less than a yard or two gain. It has worked well for some teams throughout the years.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Jay Ratliff!

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 29, 2009 11:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I was thinking Anthony Spencer.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 29, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

i like the way spencer throws his body around but..

If I gotta pick one guy to hit a LB and make a hole its bookings…

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 29, 2009 4:57 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

The Ravens line up Haloti Ngata

at FB in goalline formations. That 345-lb monster used to play rugby in high school.

by Joon on Dec 31, 2009 2:30 AM CST up reply actions  

Did yall see Free's tackle

when Romo threw that interception on Sunday—about took the guy’s head off.

by SB2008 on Dec 29, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep

Anyone who thinks he’s not as nasty as Colombo needs to wind that tape up…

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

They need to run a package like I do in Madden

Goal Line offense. Witten to the left of Flozell, flank Free with Columbo and McQuistan, with Columbo on the inside. I can’t be stopped with that offense, I can run the ball downfield the entire game without passing if I had to.

2009 BTB Part Deux Fantasy League Champion. 'Kill Everybody 13-2'. KDP knows football.

by KD Drummond on Dec 29, 2009 11:05 AM CST reply actions  

If Jason Williams can cover....

We will be in great shape next year defensively. Of course let’s get through this year. As One. Cool. Customer. we are getting good to great play from our corners. And even Eagles fans up here where I live are talking about how good Dallas’ front seven is. That plus Romo’s reduced turnovers gives me some real hope. That we can get to the NFC Championship at least.

by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Dec 29, 2009 11:05 AM CST reply actions  

Free had a great 2nd level block

On the bubble screen to Austin scored on against OAK. He hit a lineman, released then made a block on a DB along w Crayton. Very athletic in space on that play.

Always be more than you appear and never appear to be more than you are

by tdships on Dec 29, 2009 11:06 AM CST reply actions  

Free moves much better than Davis

I wonder if he has a future at guard after Colombo comes back?

He earholed Randall Gay on that play you mention and knocked Gay out of the game.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 29, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Any chance they move free to LT this season?

I understand its probably not going to happen but with Columbos return it would be a possiblity.

I think the coaches wouldnt remove Adams this year though. They dont seem to make those tough personal decisions untill its to late(nick folk) the offseason(T.O.) or someone has such a good performance they have to play more (Miles Austin)

"Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk"

by sprewelllatrell on Dec 29, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

It's too late in the season to jack with O-line

Besides what is Flo doing wrong?

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 11:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Whiffing on pass blocking

he’s not terrible, but he’s having more issues with speed than in previous years.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 11:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Good post Raf

And what was I looking at this AM?
To complement your numbers, I was noticing Offensive points/Game:
NO-33
Phil-29
GB-29
Minn-28
Ariz-25
Dallas-23.

While our D’s been great, let’s hope they keep it up.

And that number is an indictment of the ‘genius’ Garrett. For all the arguments about is it playcalling or execution, OL talent or playcalling, the fact is he should be getting more out of this unit, w/ the improved play of Romo and huge downturn in turnovers.

Who would’ve thought our ‘O’ would struggle so much and the D would become consistent?

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Dec 29, 2009 11:54 AM CST reply actions  

I think also you can skew that number by a number of missed kicks as well.

Not like it would be huge but that does effect it.

Dallas is getting yardage but I bet they’ve left 30 pts. on the board just off of field goals.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 29, 2009 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a factor but not likely to change

so might as well factor it in.

In a close game, what are they going to do w/ a FG kicker they don’t trust? (For ex., 4thy and short from the 30 yard line)
We got away with some gambles against the Skins, but at some point they need to trust the new guy to make some kicks.

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Dec 29, 2009 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

true..but if you take field position into acount...

I would think it changes a lot, including defensive points also…who knows…

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 29, 2009 5:07 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

We're actually pretty good in yeards gained

2nd only to NO in the conference I think. We just have problems scoring as often as we should – which goes back to those short yardage situations

by Sean N on Dec 29, 2009 12:54 PM CST up reply actions  

untimely penalties, missed kicks and short yardage

have been our undoing.

However, as our offense always seems to move the ball well, it does help our defense – it seems time after time after time, teams need to go 80 yards to score on them.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 1:48 PM CST up reply actions  

The two stats are related

The offense would have scored more if the team needed to win shootouts. The fact that they have held teams down have resulted in the offense playing things closer to the vest in the second half of many of their wins. The team would have scored more verse Washington if it was 14-14 all at half time.

Other then the short yardage woes this offense is a good compliment to a defensive team. They can strike quick, but are also able to put together one or two six minute drives a game.

That said, if the defense falters, the Cowboys will be hard pressed to win by scoring 35 points a game.

by Trey, on Dec 29, 2009 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I have to say this is true

Dallas has gone conservative in several games like that.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

while thats true

The Cards, Saints and Vikings could’ve scored 40+ in many more of their matchups if they didn’t go conservative.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Our games are going to be opposite of the rest of this conferences' games

The rest of this conference will be in shootouts week after week while we’ll be winning (if we win) with defense and a smart qb who makes timely plays (this pretty much IS the steelers recipe to success)

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I bet those numbers are skewed

because the Dallas defense never scores (or gives the offense a short field).

NO, Phil, GB and Minn each get a ton of turnovers and score TDs off them. Dallas just doesn’t.

by DavidH22 on Dec 29, 2009 4:10 PM CST up reply actions  

bye

while a bye would be nice, i don’t really want one. especially if dallas beats philly. dallas will be on a roll and a bye can wreck that. not saying it wil but it can. i would like that first round game at home though.

by maxdout on Dec 29, 2009 12:21 PM CST reply actions  

Post of the week

Rec’d

Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.

by accidental innuendo on Dec 29, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions  

i thought that was..

Lake tahoue..(sp?)

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 29, 2009 5:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

i thought that was..

Lake tahoue..(sp?)

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 29, 2009 5:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

ESPN, C'MON MAN

Apparently, ESPN thinks Anthony Spencer is Jay Ratliff.

 See stock watch: http://espn.go.com/nfl/

by zapruder on Dec 29, 2009 12:25 PM CST reply actions  

I don't care

I would love to show the Packers that they got lucky with their win

I would love to show the Cardinals that they have the benefit of playing in a crappy division

I would love the show the Saints that they should’ve begged for the playoffs after the first 8 games

I would love to show the Vikings that when you sign Favre, you only get a QB that plays till November

And I would love to spank the Eagles three times in a season en route to a championship

Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.

by accidental innuendo on Dec 29, 2009 12:49 PM CST reply actions  

That's what I like

a balanced attack.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Great post Raf

Matchups make such a difference in this league. Year after year you see it, but many don’t recognize that the team that wins the superbowl isn’t always better than all 11 other playoff games

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 1:59 PM CST reply actions  

My favorite first round matchups for Dallas, in order:

1. Minnesota
2. Arizona
3. Green Bay
4. Philadelphia

The last thing I think Dallas needs to see in the tournament is the Eagles. I’m confident they could beat anybody else on opening weekend.

You don’t want your team to lose, but if Philly wins this weekend, I’m not despondent so long as Dallas looks solid doing so.

by Urinal Mint on Dec 29, 2009 2:30 PM CST reply actions  

I'd rather Philly than GB or AZ

this fear of philly is unfounded imo – this is a big play offense with a suspect defense. We have proven we can slow down big play offenses, and i think we can take advantage of their D.

GB pretty much owned us. And I really think AZ is the most complete team in this conference.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't care who we play.

I just want it to be in Dallas. Cowboys beat any of them at home.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions  

The Cards?

They definitely don’t run the ball well and they’re in the middle of the pack stopping the run.
They’re minus-5 in turnover margin.
I don’t view them as all that complete.

As for the Packers, I just don’t see them being able to stop the Cowboys offense dead in their tracks in a rematch.

by MadMick on Dec 29, 2009 4:48 PM CST up reply actions  

They haven't played well recently defensively

but remember – this same thing happened last year. In a playoff game, they have Kurt Warner, who has been maybe the best playoff qb in the last 12 years, the best receiver in the game, another top 10 receiver, a run game thats done well recently….

I would be happy to be wrong, but I think Arizona will be the toughest out in these playoffs.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 5:11 PM CST up reply actions  

No doubt having to deal with their receiving corps alone is enough to give one the proverbial poopy pants.

As great as Warner has been in the playoffs though, he will turn it over. A ton.

Also, I don’t trust any NFC team to make a trend of being able to suddenly turn it on in the playoffs.

by MadMick on Dec 31, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Im happy we are in but....

The 2 biggest nightmares i have are…

1. Crayton fumbling a punt at the wrong time
2. Suisum missing a gamewinngin fg

Other than that i love our chances.

"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."

by saidseven on Dec 29, 2009 2:47 PM CST reply actions  

really?

This team was soundly beaten by GB, had a very close (to some extent LUCKY) in over Philly earlier this year, and we were also beaten by SD and Denver thoroughly, though we did miss opportunities in both games.

My biggest concern would be this team not capitalizing on opportunities like the GB, SD and Denver games. Or turning the ball over at inopportune times.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

How many games have we been blown out in?

I accept the team for what it is. We aren’t elite but we are good enough to run the table, its been the trend in the nfl that the best team most likely wont win. A little luck and some good playing i wouldn’t be surprised if we make it. If we lose i wouldnt be suprised either, i just dont want one of the 2 things i listed to be the reason.

"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."

by saidseven on Dec 29, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions  

ok, i guess i misinterpreted your post

I read that as “the only way we’re losing is if one of these two things happen”.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Dallas doesn't want to play in Philly or GB IMO.

Philly is a shit hole and both have horrible weather this time of year. I hate that games as important as the playoffs are played in crappy weather. It takes so much away from the game. It’s a passing league and teams can’t pass in snow, sleet, and rain, but that’s the way it is.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 3:21 PM CST reply actions  

I don't agree..

Dallas doesn’t have that big brute RB that you need to take over in wind snow and ice. Cowboys need to pass to score, plus if it’s extremely cold Dallas will having a hard time coping with it being a warm weather team.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm goning to have to agree to disagree here.

Dallas has more talent in the backfield than either GB or Philly. If utilized properly, the trio would wear out any defense in the league. MB3 is not the everydown back they are playing him as. He was better in ’06 and ’07 as the change of pace and 3rd down back when he would come in later in the game and wear defenses down.

"You don't become a Hawkeye fan, You're born with Black and Gold in your veins." - Me

by BStylin Hawkye on Dec 29, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Have you watched the games lately?

The Dallas line isn’t blowing anyone off the LOS. If Dallas has to get away from the pass and depend on the run they’re in trouble, as most teams in the NFL are. Really the point I was making was about the chance of playing in extremely cold weather, that would not favor Dallas.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 29, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Plus the McFlabb factor

He does better in the cold because he’s naturally insulated from it.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 29, 2009 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

we may not have the best big back but with our D stopping the run..

I’d put our 3 good backs 1 very good TE and romo against any cold weather team….philly’s not exactly a running juggernaut….

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 29, 2009 5:22 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

There have been plenty of entertaining games in muck.

The immediate one that comes to mind is the 1993 NFC Title Game between the 9ers and Cowboys.

Meanwhile the lowest scoring playoff game I can remember in the last two decade was the 11-6 barnburner between the Rams and Bucs; in a dome.

by MadMick on Dec 29, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Dallas would love to play in Philly or GB

Because it can not happen unless they won a playoff game and had advanced to the divisional playoffs or the NFC championship game.

by Trey, on Dec 30, 2009 2:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Strangely enough, I think those damn '07 Giants gained the most confidence....

From a game they actually lost; that of course being the season finale against the Patsies. First and foremost, Eli had 4 TD passes after having played like dung the prior two weeks.

by MadMick on Dec 29, 2009 4:35 PM CST reply actions  

that giants team

also got lucky we missed opportunities that were right in front of us against them. They played as well as they did in the 07 regular season and we didnt.

by foyesboys on Dec 29, 2009 5:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Every championship team has some luck on their side

Think the ‘93 or ’95 Cowboys didn’t have some breaks go their way? Last year’s Steelers? The Colts in ’06?

Taking advantage of the breaks is part of being a champion.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 29, 2009 5:52 PM CST up reply actions  

"Taking advantage. . .

. . .of the breaks" is true. Wishing for/relying on them is another story.

We’ve had a lot more playoff seasons than 70, 95 and 99. So have a lot of other teams.

Looks like it’s time to really drill down for a real analysis, instead of just posting stuff that favors a particular position or POV.

Nonetheless, nice post.

by dfan77 on Dec 30, 2009 4:34 AM CST reply actions  

and no

I have no idea why we’re talking here about a 1970 Cowboys team. Sure, I became a fan 7 years later, but seriously? Really? Is there anything even remotely close to comparable here?

Wow.

by dfan77 on Dec 30, 2009 4:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys 2012 Defensive-Fronts
Small
Simplicity, and execution... The keys to the top offense of the last Decade...
Tn48_small
Building a Defense: The Case for Morris Claiborne
Kegbearer_small
Aikman, Irvin & Emmitt Interview

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn