Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Cowboys vs. Giants Preview: Can the Cowboys Beat Up Their Old Selves?

The old rivals set up for their rematch Sunday.  We can overdo the superlatives, get caught up in the voo-doo of December, and talk about the closing of Giants Stadium.

Or, we could talk about matchups.

When the Giants Have the Ball

When Dallas faced the Giants in September, they saw an opponent which presented a host of matchup problems.  The Cowboys had stuggled against New York's rushing attack in the past, particularly runs to its perimeter.  Run defense was again the focus, as the Cowboys trusted their secondary to contain the young Giants duo of Steve Smith, and Mario Manningham.  (Rookie Hakeem Nicks missed the game with an ankle injury.)

Star-divide

 

Dallas got half the plan down.  They contained Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw, holding the New York attack to less than 30 first half rushing yards.  But the Cowboys rush did not sack Eli Manning that night, which gave Manningham and Smith time to work out the right side of Dallas secondary.  Both receivers attacked Terence Newman and Smith, when lined up in his long-time spot in the slot, abused Orlando Scandrick.  Each receiver caught ten passes. Manningham gained 150 yards and Smith 134.  They gained 86% of the Giants 330 passing yards.

The balance and the fun continued until game five's 44-7 blowout win over Oakland.  While the win was impressive, the Giants offense began absorbing key injuries which have continued to accumulate to this day. 

Quarterback Eli Manning left after just ten passing attempts with a foot injury, later diagnosed as plantar fasciitis.  He says the foot has healed but several reports this week note that he has suffered a stress reaction in the same leg and his overall health remains an issue.  Running back Ahmad Bradshaw, the speed complement to the bludgeon Jacobs, injured an ankle later in the contest and has not been the same since, as this line shows:

  • Bradshaw, games 1-5:  58 carries, 375 yards, 6.5 yards/carry, 75 yards/game;
  • Bradshaw, games 6-10: 57 carries, 174 yards, 3.1 yds./carry, 35 yds./game

The injuries contined the following week against New Orleans, when right tackle Kareem McKenzie was rolled from behind and had to leave the game.  His injury broke a run of almost two years when the Giants starting line stayed intact. 

In many ways, the '09 Giants offense resembles the '08 Cowboys O, which accumulated injuries to linemen and skill position players and saw its effectiveness erode as the season progressed.  In New York's case, the numbers do not lie:

  • Games 1-5:  5-0 record, 30 points/game., 160 rush yds./game, 2 sacks allowed
  • Games 6-11: 1-5 record, 20 points/game, 99 rush yds./game, 15 sacks allowed

New York has been dying the death of a thousand paper cuts, or a dozen joint sprains, in this case.   They have not suffered the catastrophic injury, like Plaxico Burress' last year, but their line, their backs and their quarterback have all been hobbled, and the results have dropped their offensive output a whopping ten points per game.

Dallas' task will be to face up to their old offense and show it no mercy.  That may be easier said than done, because many of the same matchups which worked in New York's favor three months ago remain. 

When New York runs the ball, it will be the Cowboys' task to make them play to their character.  That may sound counter-intuitive, but New York's line, like Dallas' blocks better on the move.  It also runs its attack better to the perimeters.  Off-side counters, tosses, cross-blocks between the tackles and tight ends.  These are the bread and butter plays of New York''s attack. 

That is why they miss Bradshaw, or at least the healthy incarnation of Bradshaw.  Jacobs can get off-tackle, but he looks sluggish and the Broncos showed that a 3-4 front with speed can bog him down by forcing him to run to the sidelines.  Jacobs lacks the speed to turn the corner, of if his first hole isn't available inside or off tackle, he can be dropped for minimal gains. 

It is unclear which Jacobs will show.  He played heroically in the first month after Bradshaw's injury, having three of his season-best games against New Orleans, Arizona and San Diego, but he has been almost invisible since the Giants' bye, rushing for 66 total yards and a 2.9 average per carry.  In any case, he will have to shoulder New York's rushing burden.  Bradshaw has not practiced this week to rest his ailing ankle and his speedy backup Danny Ware was knocked out of last week's game with a concussion and has already been ruled out for this contest.

Expect far more blitzing this week than we saw in week two.  As I noted then, Wade Phillips went against type early in the year, choosing to rush just 4 men on most of Dallas' pass plays, where he used 5 man rushes as his default last year. 

He will not let Manning sit in the pocket.  Phillips knows Smith and Manningham are the focal points of New York's attack right now.  Smith has 869 receiver yards and Manningham has logged 665 of his own.  Nicks is back and is having an impressive rookie year.  OC Kevin Gilbride will likely use the same passing strategy, throwing a lot on first down and targeting Newman.  The veteran has solidified his play since weeks one and two, but he's the preferred target over Mike Jenkins.

I also look for the Giants to spread the field to put Smith inside against against Scandrick.  His sophomore campaign has been rough.  He struggled the first month, then stepped up, but appears to have flattened out the last few games. 

New York can still throw the ball, so Wade's task will be to disrupt Manning.  As the stats show, this protection has broken down a lot the last six games, especially in comparison to the 5-0 start, when Manning was barely touched.  Denver shut the Giants down last week with lots of pressure off the edges, which made Manning drift laterally and preventing him from getting into a regular rhythm with his wideouts. 

Look for lots of Cowboys on the line of scrimmage, to run blitz and to attack Manning.  Dallas has moved Demarcus Ware around a lot the last month, flopping him to the right side to get mismatches against right tackles and putting him in the center of a 3-3 nickel front, where he is free to roam between the tackles and pick a rush lane. 

Phillips blitzed without restraint in last year's rematch and sacked Manning eight times.  New York's banged up running attack invites him to dust that game plan off and try it again.  New York's WR could sting him a bit, but I don't think Wade will back off the pressure unless his secondary flops, and they have been solid the last two months.

Tomorrow: The Cowboys offense vs. the Giants defense

0 recs  |  Comment 139 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

First for the first time in my life WOOOOOOOOOO

Seriously, though, the G’s have no run game, I know because I have both Jacobs and AB on my ff team :(

by Joon on Dec 3, 2009 12:46 PM CST reply actions  

Now that is hilarious!!

The old: “Here, gime your hand” trick..haha

by Bobbiblue on Dec 4, 2009 9:07 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL

I still believe in Romo.

by Nelson... on Dec 3, 2009 5:34 PM CST up reply actions  

You stay classy Jay

Admit it, if that was Jacobs over some DB he flattened you’d all be foaming at the mouth. Or Tuck over Romo.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 3, 2009 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Classy?

You mean like Eli autographing the visitors locker room wall (brand new stadium) with the final score? You think that’s classy? I don’t have anything against Eli but I wouldn’t exactly call that a classy thing would you

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 7:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I think its great.

Classy? No. There’s always jawing on the field between these two…I doubt if any of them ask where they can get the cheapest lobster dinner in the city.

I think that this Ratliff thing, as with the multiple other things that’s said on the field between these 2…what Eli did was nothing but a small jab.

I think the Ratliff thing is funny too. Not as funny as I think of the autographed wall of Dallas “brand new stadium”.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Nah, it wasn't a small jab; it was defacing someone else's property like a 12-year-

old boy. I’m sure you’d be cool if someone wrote all over your front door. Hey, I’m glad Eli did something that sophomoric, because the Dallas D evidently remembers it and didn’t much appreciate it, so here’s hoping they make him pay.

by Fernie67 on Dec 3, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions  

even Wade sounded perturbed......

hard to get him stirred up and say something

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 9:23 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL!

act like that doesn’t happen at every stadium.

“defacing property”…..SURE!

But the first of its kind? I think not.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, dumb*** fans probably do it all the time. The leaders of teams?

Man, I hope there aren’t many stupid enough to act like that.

by Fernie67 on Dec 3, 2009 9:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't get where its such a huge deal

I mean yea, I’d be pissed. The Cowboys have a right to be pissed cuz they lost that game.

I think Bradie said it himself, he doesn’t go into the visitors locker. I’m sure most players don’t go into the visitors locker room, so its probably in every visitors locker.

I’d be more pissed at the dude who took the picture and put it on the internet. Really both sides should be pissed at that, cuz they are the ones that started this ""mess"

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

well what really puts salt on the wound.......

was apparently Jacobs stomped on the Star either before/ after the game. You know what happens to people that disrespect the Star don’t you? Just ask TO

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

only reason its a big deal

is cuz the fool that asked Eli to do it took a picture and put it on the interweb.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 9:51 PM CST up reply actions  

so since you beat us at our new stadium......

how will you feel if we beat you for the last game at your old stadium? That would be kinda ironic wouldn’t it?

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 9:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Well..

for the Giants vs. Cowboys series…I guess.

But the first game ever at one stadium….does not equal the last game at Giants stadium.

If the Panthers beat the Giants….kind of a different story.

The Eagles even have last licks as a divisional foe at the old digs.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

**does not equal the 3rd to last game

at Giants stadium.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess so....

I would’ve hoped that beating the Giants for the first time in their new stadium would be more satisfying…but to each his own.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 10:03 PM CST up reply actions  

how about we close this stadium........

with a wind and open the new one with a win-yeah now we’re talking. I’ll be sure a send a care package of extra sharpies for the Boys to autograph your old/new stadium-LOL

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 10:13 PM CST up reply actions  

kinda reminds me of what happened to my son several years ago.....

a kid told him to swipe all the other kids glue and he brought them home with him in his backpack. Of course I made him take the glue back and he got into trouble. Only difference in this story-my son was in the second grade-LOL

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 9:58 PM CST up reply actions  

the Cowboys staffer gave him the pen.

Eli is surprised also, said this is commonplace.

This is sort of one of those Dallas media overhyped type things.

Same thing probably happened when the Cardinals opened their new stadium……

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 10:00 PM CST up reply actions  

lol

all it says is “locker room attendant”…so I guess that could be swayed in either direction.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

all I'm saying is Wade

is saying that no one from the Cowboys authorized this.

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 10:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree..there is no call for that..

Players should keep it real and use the bathroom stalls for that kinda stuff..Gee whiz what is this country coming to.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 4, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions  

And when the Cowboys open the new Giants/Jets Stadium with a win next year, I hope Romo returns the favor

This is a form of trash talking, and trash talking is a big part of sports. If you take a step back, you’d see it was funny.

I have no problem with this at all, and I hope Romo (or another Cowboy) returns the favor next year.

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Dec 3, 2009 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

It's just not funny to me, but I guess I don't see the humor in defacing

someone else’s home. I really don’t want to hear that Romo returned that kind of favor. He can do his talking on the field.

by Fernie67 on Dec 3, 2009 10:36 PM CST up reply actions  

If it fires up the D then fine.

But, as far as defacing property? It isn’t like he took spray paint to the Star at midfield. Oh, yeah if I played for the Cowboys I would go to the visitors locker room so I could relieve my self in their lockers.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Dec 3, 2009 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks Raf....

I Love these breakdowns. We got to get them off the field on 3rd downs.

by CowboyCurtis on Dec 3, 2009 1:12 PM CST reply actions  

1st down

Dallas played run on 1st down in September and Eli ripped them to pieces throwing deep off play action.

by Rafael Vela on Dec 3, 2009 1:18 PM CST reply actions  

I hope Wade unleashes the

Chaos Blitz package. Brookings and James have been excellent on the delayed blitz.

by CowboyCurtis on Dec 3, 2009 1:36 PM CST reply actions  

Shock and Awe

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Dec 3, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Raf you just ruined my lunch

The thought of the Giants attacking Newman is just too nauseus for me to handle. I hope we get to Mannig and his gimpy foot before he can throw the ball….and I guess the reason they go to Newman is because they know he’ll never get an Int…he may prevent the completion but he wont go for the pick…..I wish they would attack Jenkins that way.

by ManTab on Dec 3, 2009 1:47 PM CST reply actions  

Newman had at least one huge pick...

…last year against the Giants in the 2nd meeting.

The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.

by gee-roj on Dec 3, 2009 2:07 PM CST up reply actions  

-1

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 4, 2009 12:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Great breask-down, Raf

This figures to be a tough game if Dallas doesn’t execute well. If they can score points early and regularly, they can put pressure on the areas od the Giants’ injury problems. If they let it become a slogging affair, it’s anyone’s game.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 3, 2009 1:57 PM CST reply actions  

it always comes down to execution and turnovers

If we execute and protect the ball, we’ll win, although it’s nice to read Raf’s posts on the matchups, always interesting.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 2:03 PM CST up reply actions  

The way the defense has been playing, I have to agree.

If we play our “A” game, we should take it, but we have to win the turnovers.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Dec 3, 2009 3:12 PM CST up reply actions  

It has to start with the QB...

I am not absolving anyone else of their responsibilities…but i believe that we lost the first game to the giants because of the ill-fated interception. Romo needs to absolutely ensure he doesn’t let the game get away from him.

by thejanusman on Dec 3, 2009 3:36 PM CST up reply actions  

agree completely......

exhibit “A”-Pittsburgh game Dec. 08
exhibit “B”-Philly debacle Dec. 08
exhibit “C”-Philly game Dec. 07
exhibit “D”-Philly game Dec. 06

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 4:11 PM CST up reply actions  

we just have to eliminate the Pa teams

from our schedule in December. ;)

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 4:33 PM CST up reply actions  

yes we can

just play them in Sept through November, is that too much to ask of the schedule makers?

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 4, 2009 7:42 AM CST up reply actions  

This has nothing to do with this comment...

but I saw you write something a while back that I thought about responding but never had the time to do.

I generally like your posts and me and you are generally eye to eye, BUT I hated the remark you made about Roy Williams dropping passes and somehow turning that on Romo, comparing it to Reggie Wayne catching tough passes because he’s afraid of Peyton Manning.

Reggie Wayne catch’s tough passes because he’s one of the top receivers in the league.

Does he respect manning? Sure, and I’m sure he feels like crap for dropping a pass, but it’s not like he hasn’t dropped passes before.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 3, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I guarantee that Wayne is not afraid of Manning

I agree, Wayne catches passes because he’s really good and for no other reason than that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

You're right about Wayne......

but it’s an accountability thing too. Great teams just step up to the plate and perform. They don’t have stupid penalties that negate huge plays, WR’s drop passes etc. It’s the mental part that these guys seem to have. They are like a well oiled machine with Peyton at the helm. BTW Immortal, it came out in our paper yesterday that when Colt McCoy was struggling with trying to be the perfect QB, guess who he called? Peyton Manning and VY. Thought that was kinda interesting.

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 4:46 PM CST up reply actions  

there is something to this

Patrick crayton gets demoted and Dallas brings in Rossum. How does he respond? two return tds, a much improved return effort overall and he makes big plays week after week on offense. Accountability goes a long way.

But Waynes an amazing player. Also, consider that the colts have a bunch of high draft picks as first rounders, we obviously don’t. But I don’t think its coincidence that two of the best receivers in the past 10 years have been paired with Peyton Manning.

Frankly, if we’re going to dock Romo points for accountability, we should credit him and the coaching staff for coaching up a bunch of low round/no round picks to become starters and solid players.

by foyesboys on Dec 3, 2009 7:10 PM CST up reply actions  

true.......

but Peyton has Pierre Garcon and Austin Collie. I don’t believe either one of those were high draft picks. I wasn’t knocking Romo, but the offense of the Colts still amazes me how they just keep on clicking. Admittedly there’s not anyone else in the league like Peyton, but you have to admire his perfectionist attitude and how he expects everyone around him to play-hence the accountability comes into play

by texstar on Dec 3, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

he's a future HOFer

and will go down as one of the best qbs of all time and many will argue the very best of all time so the Colts success with him as qb doesn’t surprise me at all.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 4, 2009 7:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Raf, any worry about Kevin Boss?

If we focus on blitzing and their WR’s, could Boss make an impact?

by WAREwolf94 on Dec 3, 2009 2:51 PM CST reply actions  

Definitely,

Washington was very successful at exploiting the underneath routes to RB’s and TE’s when Dallas went heavy with the blitz.

Oakland almost did that as well but they failed to execute on several occasions.

"What the hell is going on out there?" - Vince Lombardi.

by Nisri on Dec 3, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm confident Sensabaugh and even Spencer with deep help can handle Boss

He’s the least scary TE in the division, to me.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions  

don't sleep on Boss

cuz if your only looking at his stats, your getting about 1/100th of the picture.

The Giants rarely use him. They don’t target him at all, and he has basically as many targets as catches.

If the Giants ever decide to usu him, he could be their version of Witten.

I don’t mean to start that cuz of your TE…but Boss is very much in the same vein as Witten.

He’s not there yet, but over at BBV we all know he’s fully capable of being a Witten type TE, its just the Giants don’t use him.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 4, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Wow. I am not looking at only his stats.

But Boss is the division’s worst starting TE. It’s not a huge insult— it’s just a fact. The starting TEs in the NFC East are very good.

What is your basis for saying he is Witten caliber? Because Witten is not only an elite receiver who historically has been able to stretch the defense up the seam, but is one of the best 4 or 5 blocking TEs in the league. Boss doesn’t seem in Witten’s class in either of those categories. Witten is routinely the focus of opposing DC’s game plans and gets attention from top cover CBs.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I think he's basing on

what he seems capable of vice how they use him.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 4, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, that makes sense

But it just seems pretty premature and/or speculative to say, “Man, if the Giants threw to Boss more, he’d be in Witten’s class!” Maybe, but that’s a pretty big leap to take.

Also, if that were the case and he were an ELITE player at his position…you’d think they’d throw to him more.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

its simply not the case.

If the Giants had Jason Witten himself on the team…they still would target him as much as they do Boss.

Its what Coughlin has don his entire coaching career dating back to Jacksonville and what Gilbride had done his entire career as a OC and a HC.

The 2 people in charge of the offense don’t stress it…so its not gonna be done.

ANd I in no way said Boss would be as good as Witten…I said he could be teh Giants version of Witten i.e their leading pass catcher or there about. (where you got I say he’s as good…I have no idea).

I see Boss as potentially like WItten cuz he’s a gigantic target, had great hands and is a very good blocker actually.

…the Giants just refuse to use him and it frustrates me every single time Eli’s waiting for Dominik Hixon to get open.

A team that struggles in teh Red Zone..you’d think they’d send the 6"7 265lbs former basketball player out over the middle.

Now they did do this in teh Atlanta game (some maybe they were paying attention to BBV), so maybe they were just full on Turkey last thursday?

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 4, 2009 6:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I like Boss and a number of catches are back breakers.

If you ever read any Giants blog, the one thing they are all united on is the under use of Boss in the passing game. He is not Witten but when your the best in the East thats where the comparison begin.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Dec 4, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course

Witten IMO is the best in the business overall.

Boss to me possess a lot of that skill set. He doesn’t have Witten’s agility, acceleration or top end speed, but he’s a good route runner, and well..he’s bigger than Witten.

It just baffles me that they don’t use this guy, but given the history of our HC and OC…its expected.

I don’t have much doubt that if they had a different set of coaches (re: Fassel) that at least Boss would be averaging Shockey numbers, possibly more (cuz Boss acutally catches the ball more than 25% of his targets).

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 4, 2009 6:11 PM CST up reply actions  

As usual...

..great job, Raf. Excellent analysis.

by HappyGilmour on Dec 3, 2009 2:53 PM CST reply actions  

Two workers fall from roof of Cowboys Stadium

Here’s the Link

Fall from roof

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Dec 3, 2009 2:57 PM CST reply actions  

as awesome as that place is

it certainly is a major risk management nightmare from an insurance standpoint. I don’t even want to know how much Jerry pays in his workers comp premium.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I think its just new

they’re still working out the safety mechanisms and whats needed to keep workers safe

by AustonianAggie on Dec 3, 2009 3:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Who's building these things?

And why are safety (OSHA) measures not being enforced?..First the collapse of the practice facility..Which was tragic, but could very well have been more tragic, now guys are falling off the new stadium roof?..Geezus

by Bobbiblue on Dec 4, 2009 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

when something is fantastic and new

you discover new problems you didn’t know you’d have.

by AustonianAggie on Dec 4, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

The stadium workers were not tied off to a fall harness cable, the guys should not have been working there

the conditions on the roof were icy; contractors need to show more awareness of the job. I work at a plant, our plant forces and contractors are required to do a prejob inspeciton to make sure they evaluate the worksite to identify any hazards.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Dec 4, 2009 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I have this very real fear...

(And I do not say this as a joke, not at all….)

That the video screen is going to come crashing down during a game. I just hope that sucker is bolted, welded and super-glued tighter than hell.

by tkosmith on Dec 3, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm sure that is extremely unlikely to ever happen

I’m sure those securing mechanisms are checked on constantly.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 3, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't blame you..They need to

Thoroughly check that place out..If that thing ever fell down it would leave a crater in the ground..

by Bobbiblue on Dec 4, 2009 9:33 AM CST up reply actions  

are you guys paranoid?

4 real, when has any video screen ever crashed down?

by AustonianAggie on Dec 4, 2009 9:35 AM CST up reply actions  

the thought had crossed my mind too......

I’m not paranoid, but it does kinda make you wonder if that video screen is secure doesn’t it? I mean, you can kinda look at it like who would have thought that a couple could crash a State Dinner at the White House? I know it’s different circumstances but all I’m trying to say is “things happen”.-LOL

by texstar on Dec 4, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Titanic wasnt suppose to be sinkable.

Im a little paranoid as well and I dont usually sweat this stuff.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Dec 4, 2009 12:35 PM CST up reply actions  

The 2 workers weren't wearing their safety harnesses. Sure they will go on WC,

but it doesn’t mean that the building is a danger. Stupid people are the danger.

by jdramirez on Dec 4, 2009 8:54 AM CST up reply actions  

hopefully......

we don’t need to call out the priests to sprinkle some fairy dust and exercise the place cause you don’t want the place to be possessed-(I’m teasing)

by texstar on Dec 4, 2009 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Scandrick..

It seems that his game has regressed over the past few weeks, i am disappointed at that. He seemed to be our answer in the slot, maybe we move TNew to the Slot and have him play outside.

by thejanusman on Dec 3, 2009 3:34 PM CST reply actions  

Really?

I thought Scandrick was holding up his end of the deal in the slot.

by DavidH22 on Dec 3, 2009 4:11 PM CST reply actions  

Correct...

He was used and abused in the first Giants game this year, prompting Steve Smith of the Panthers the next week to openly hope that #32 would be covering him when they played the boys.

by Rembrthe90s on Dec 3, 2009 4:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Scandrick's had an up and down year

he was in great coverage on several throws that were completed on him too.

by AustonianAggie on Dec 3, 2009 4:22 PM CST up reply actions  

+2

aside from that first game, he hasn’t been that bad. Decent. There have been many memorable catches made right over him.

by foyesboys on Dec 3, 2009 7:06 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree, he's had some bad luck letting up catches where his coverage was excellent

But he has definitely regressed a bit from last year’s excellent rookie season.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Scandrick started that game

Remember Wade had Jenkins and Scandrick starting alternate games until Jenkins earned the starting spot.

He just plays better as the #3 CB against the slot WR.

You can't stop Patrick Crayton, you can only hope to contain him.

by APerfectStar on Dec 4, 2009 12:16 AM CST up reply actions  

I hope we sack them 9 times this week

:D

2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: not 11-5 :(
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25

by Grady90 on Dec 3, 2009 9:31 PM CST reply actions  

I find this an interesting observation...
In many ways, the ’09 Giants offense resembles the ’08 Cowboys O

I was just thinking today that the 08 Giants season resembled the Cowboys 07 season. They exploded out to an 11-1 start, then kind of flattened out. Even though they were the No. 1 seed, they ended up losing their first playoff game. Now you observe that the 09 Giant’s O resembles, the Cowboys 08 O. If this holds true, perhaps we can expect to see the Giants make a last fighting effort soon, then watch their season go up in flames. We need to find our best focus of the season from here on out. If we are to truly make a run in December and January, now is the time to get the penalties under control, and start picking the ball off.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Dec 3, 2009 9:38 PM CST reply actions  

the difference is the Giants can't run even if they wanted to.

If they could move the ball on the ground like the Cowboys of this year or last? They’d probably have a better record, or at least resemble a better team right now.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 3, 2009 9:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I remember the first game....

Where we were confident they couldn’t throw it and “all” we had to do was to stop the running game. Well……they started throwing right away and that set the tone and they abused us. (However they wouldn’t have won without our help).

So, for what it’s worth, I expect them to try to come out running and surprise us. They know the same things we and the media do and will try to go with another strategy. Besides it also makes sense to protect Eli.

I am nervous about this game, somehow the Cowboys seem never to build up as much passion as the other teams or are easily put out when things don’t go their way. (Which is why I love Brooking, based on his feisty behavior he should be in the ring of fame. And I’d love to book im as a motivitavtional speaker)

Their airing it at nine pm this Sunday in Holland so I’ll get to see it live – GO COWBOYS

by Elks83 on Dec 4, 2009 2:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree (..well, except for the Go Cowboys part...)

but yea, the Cowboys could just look at the tape of the last game and think they gotta defend the pass…but then the running game could ‘surprise them’.

Kinda weird that the running game of the Giants would be surprising anyone, cuz that’s what they’re supposed to do…but as it looks right now if they do come out and be successful with the run, it will be a surprise.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 4, 2009 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I know it's usually bad luck to say this stuff

…but I am not overly worried about this game. I know it’s divisional, and because of that inherently somewhat unpredictable. That said…

We have beaten the Giants consistently in the Romo Era. Prior to this season, we were 4-1 against them in games Romo started. We turned the ball over FIVE TIMES in Week 2 this year, and we STILL nearly beat them!

They are the divisional opponent which we beat with the most regularity and by the biggest margin. I understand that our most recent memory contradicts that (Week 2 this year), but take even a slightly longer term view and we own them.

Add to that the fact that this is probably the worst Giants team we have played in the last 3 years, and I’m frankly more concerned about our second Redskins match-up than this game. I think we have every reason to be cautiously confident going into Sunday.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 11:31 AM CST reply actions  

You better be wearing a hole in your knuckles

knocking on wood over there, Tim….

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 4, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions  

oh, Tim.........

you’re jinxing us talking like that-LOL

by texstar on Dec 4, 2009 2:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha

Don’t worry, I am. I knew it’d be seen as bad karma. I guess I’m just not as worried about this game as I have been in the past. In fact, I’m really hoping we blow these guys out to show that they’re a below-average, third place team (given, it’s partly because of injuries) and to shut up all the loudmouths in their locker room.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

so let's see here......

if the Giants are below average team and the Skins are bad what does that mean about us? Just saying, if that is true, it doesn’t make our wins that great does it? I hope you’re wrong about them being below-average because it will make he win insignificant

by texstar on Dec 4, 2009 5:36 PM CST up reply actions  

?

You beat the teams that are on the schedule. It doesn’t make the wins less meaningful— I’m just saying we should be capable of beating this Giants team.

Beating a below-average team does not somehow make us worse. There are only two things you can do in a game, win or lose. There’s no “Win while improving the caliber of your opponent” option.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Dec 4, 2009 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small
Dez Bryant agrees to contract
Skipper_small
NFL 2010 Season Predictions
Tashard_small
Points Per Pass Metric, 2009 Season (All QBs)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Dez hurts himself so other teammates dont feel left out
Bitty-p_small
Dez Bryant's ankle injured?!
Christmas__08_small
Proposed Dallas trade: Free and 1st rounder for...
Small
Timothy Tebow's Contract
Miles_austin_small
Quincyyyyy's highly anticipated 53 man roster and 7 man practice squad projection
Small
To Eighteen or Not?
Skipper_small
Jimmy Johnson's Market Penetration
Tom-landry-1-sized_small
Stirring Up the Trade Pot-a Dash of Weaknesses, a Pinch of Strengths
Small
Ticket Packages
Small
How do we get a new CBA?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +4 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test For Second Day In A Row

Trainers arrive to assist as Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant reacts while grabbing his right ankle following a play at afternoon practice at Cowboys training camp Friday, July 30, 2010, in San Antonio. Bryant, who was attempting to grab a pass, got tangled up with cornerback Orlando Scandrick. (AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez) +1 updates

Dez Bryant To Miss 4-6 Weeks With High Ankle Sprain

Indianapolis Colts tight end Dallas Clark is tied up be Baltimore Ravens cornerback Domonique Foxworth during the first quarter of NFL divisional football playoff game, Saturday, Jan. 16, 2010 in Indianapolis. (AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

Ravens Cornerback Domonique Foxworth Tears ACL, Out For Season With Injury

More from SBNation.com >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer