Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

The VRR: Pundits are Liking Either the Cowboys or Eagles to Win the NFC

The Vikings, Saints, Packers, and Cardinals would all offer any NFL team a tough game. While the Vikings and the Saints have cooled off recently, the Packers and Cardinals have been rather hot.

When members of the media dissect the NFC playoff picture, many have focused their attentions on the two NFC East playoff teams: the Cowboys and the Eagles. Why not? Both teams are on winning streaks, and both are simply playing good football.

Pete Prisco is picking Dallas to win the NFC, citing Tony Romo's "sensational" play, a resurgent running game, and solid defense.

If they play with the lead, it's really good. That's when DeMarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer can get after the quarterback without having real run concerns. That's what Ware did at New Orleans. When he can pin his ears back and go, Dallas is a better defense. Spencer is really emerging on the other side. That helps cover up some issues in the secondary. I think the Cowboys beat the Eagles this week and that will probably give them one home playoff game. They've already shown they can win a big game on the road when they beat the Saints. The Cowboys are getting it going at the right time.

More VRR after the jump.

Star-divide

Clark Judge picks the Eagles to win this week.

I'll take the Eagles for two reasons: 1) They're peaking at the right time, and 2) they know how to win playoff games. Dallas does not. In fact, the Cowboys haven't won a playoff game since 1996. The Eagles, meanwhile, have been to five conference championship games the past eight years and have the playmakers this season they haven't since ... well, since Terrell Owens was on the roster.

Bucky Brooks also looks at this weekend's winner as the favorite to win the NFC. Part of the reason he likes the Cowboys is the improved play of the secondary.

Although the pressure from the front seven has clearly led to more turnover opportunities for the back end, the stellar play of Mike Jenkins and Terence Newman is noteworthy. The duo has not allowed the ball to fly over their heads in recent weeks, and the reduction of big plays has empowered coach Wade Phillips to be more aggressive with his pressure package.

As a result, the Cowboys are using more five- and six-man blitzes, and crushing quarterbacks in the pocket with their attack-style defense. With a defense that is starting to show the swagger and confidence of a champion, the Cowboys are perfectly suited to end the "one-and-done" playoff hex that has plagued the franchise since 1996.

"Prime Time's" prediction:

Basically, Deion said, look for the winner of Sunday's division title-decisive NFC East showdown between Dallas and Philadelphia to be one the two last teams standing in February.

"One of those two teams will go to the Super Bowl," Sanders said flatly.

With the Eagles losing C Jamaal Jackson for the year, RG Nick Cole will replace him.

In 15 starts, Cole has had three false start penalties, no holding penalties and has allowed only one sack. But two of his false start penalties came against the Broncos, and he also had a bad snap that resulted in a fumble.

"This week of practicing will help," Andy Reid told reporters Monday in Philadelphia. "It’ll smooth those types of things out. We should be fine."

Jay Ratliff has had some spectacular games this season, including the one in Philly.

Ratliff, [has] 71 tackles, six sacks and 31 quarterback pressures. Ratliff had eight tackles, two sacks and two quarterback pressures in the Cowboys' victory over Philadelphia earlier this year.

Is McNabb worried? Naah.

"I'm not worried at all," Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb said on a conference call with us today. "That's nothing to obviously his ability. He's a great player. He's made great plays. He has six sacks so far this season, and a guy who obviously is a Pro Bowler. But you know the thing about it is, you have to have confidence in the guys up front. Nick Cole is stepping into a center role, but he was our backup center as well as our starting guard anyway. He knows the calls. He knows what we have to do. I feel confident in our guys to be able to be on the same page."

Ken Hamlin likes the way the defense has been able to close out games.

"We're putting it together," Hamlin said. "We're playing a full four quarters right now. But looking at both films from the last two games, there's still things we can do to get better, so that's a positive thing. But we've got to continue to move forward."

In recent weeks, Tashard Choice and Keith Brooking have rallied the team with pregame speeches. "Moose" Johnston also offered some words to help the players keep the season in perspective.

The Cowboys have also drawn inspiration from a message imparted to them recently by Daryl Johnston, who played fullback for Dallas when it captured three Super Bowls during the 1990s. Brooking said Johnston told today's players that the teams led by Troy Aikman, Emmitt Smith and Michael Irvin used the motto "seven days to humility" to keep from becoming overconfident.

"We've had some success through the course of the season, and I think we've handled it in a positive way," Brooking said. "So I think right now we're primed, and we're ready to make this run. Just to be frank, our playoffs start now."

Andy Reid suggested to DMN's David Moore that Romo is playing much better now that he's not as "distracted".

"It's obvious he's a leader of the offense,'' Reid said of Romo. "Not that he wasn't before, but there were a couple of distractions there and he doesn't have any of that. He's playing great football.''

A couple of distractions, like the initials T. and O? Were those the distractions Reid was talking about?

"I think it was that hole in the dome,'' Reid said, referring to the fact the Cowboys no longer play in Texas Stadium. Well played, sir.

But answer this: did McNabb grow as a leader after certain distractions left Philadelphia?

"Well,'' Reid said, "we didn't have the hole in the dome.''

Roy Williams knows that he needs to work harder to earn back the trust of Romo and the offense.

"You know I have to get the confidence of my quarterback, because I didn’t get a look after the first half," Williams said. "I didn’t get a look in the second half. That’s telling me that my quarterback has lost confidence in me, and so has the coordinator as far as calling plays for me."

"That’s not on them. I don’t blame them. I blame myself. I’ve got to get my crap together and try to help this team win some games in the playoffs."

Head coach Wade Phillips praised Williams earlier this week by saying he "played really hard," but Williams acknowledges that he has been a disappointment since arriving from Detroit in a blockbuster trade last season.

Hat tip to dunkman for the post!

Todd Archer spoke with Jason Garrett regarding the offense's short-yardage shortcomings.

"It's hard," assistant head coach Jason Garrett said. "It's hard around the league. We've been among the best at it. Our offensive line is awfully good in those situations. Our runner has been outstanding. You have to be creative. You have to be tough. You have to have great determination. We've done a lot of that. We obviously didn't do it well enough the other night in the game. We're going to go back and look at it, evaluate the physical part of it, evaluate the technique part of it, evaluate the scheme part of it and get it right. We need to get it right as we go forward."

[snip]

"We've done a variety of things and have to keep doing a variety of things to be successful at it," Garrett said. "You don't want to make it too easy on the defense certainly. On short-yardage situations we've been successful handing it to the deep back, successful handing it to the fullback and quarterback sneak as well. That's got to be a part of the arsenal and it is part of it."

ST coach Joe DeCamillis is back at work after his appendectomy surgery. He was pleased with the work Wes Phillips did against the Redskins.

"I thought he did a great job," DeCamillis said of Phillips, who organized most of the special teams meetings this summer when DeCamillis was limited because of the neck and back injury.

"He's been in every meeting from the start of training camp. He's very organized - you can tell. We had no substitution errors. Talking to some players after the game, they all said it ran smoothly. So I thought he did a great job."

Matt Mosely lists the following Cowboys as "snubbed" by the Pro Bowl selection committee.

Tony Romo, Cowboys quarterback: Romo had almost identical numbers to Rodgers and he takes a lot fewer sacks. I wouldn't have had a problem with Romo going instead of Rodgers. Romo has played his best football in December.

Mat McBriar, Cowboys punter: San Francisco's Andy Lee had 21 more opportunities to punt the ball, but he had nine fewer punts downed inside the 20-yard line. McBriar is the master at forcing returners to fair catch the ball at their own 10-yard line. Coaches and players don't pay enough attention to special teams. McBriar had a better season than Lee and deserved to go to the Pro Bowl. Lee had the better net average, but he had a lot more kicks returned against him than McBriar.

 

There are just nine more days left to cast your ballot on the 2nd Round of the HOF votes on fanschoice.com.

Emmitt is now at #6, dropping a spot to another Raider: Lester Hayes. Charles Haley is still at #14, while Ed "Too Tall" Jones remains at #20.

Below, JJT and Skip Bayless discuss pretty much the same topic that yomjoseki asked us, Cowboys fans, in his FanPost. Fun!


Comment 152 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hate Jude's answer...

I don’t mind that he’s picking the Eagles, that’s fine, but “they know how to win playoff games.” is weak.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 30, 2009 3:17 PM CST reply actions  

I was gonna mention that, but forgot!

He cites just as many bad things about the Cowboys’ past as he does about the Eagles’ play.

Prisco, on the other hand, talks all Cowboys.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah,

I mean if that’s the case than obviously no one should ever pick the Eagles to ever win a Super Bowl because they don’t know how too.

And how did Arizona win any playoff games last year?

It’s not something that is instilled in DNA.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 30, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL so so true.

God I hate everything about philly

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 30, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I like cheese steaks...

… and the liberty bell is kinda cool.

… and my first kiss was at Rocky (the one before numbers were added) … if that counts for anything :)

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Dec 31, 2009 7:51 AM CST up reply actions  

Who you tryin' to judge?

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha!

I just read you signature. I am making elf a family tradition in my house.

by Impatient on Dec 30, 2009 3:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Me2.

I watched it thrice on Xmas eve…rotated that between A Christmas Stories.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions  

My 2 year old daughter

Stays glued to the TV when its on. Don’t tell my pediatrician though. She is adamant that children shouldn’t watch TV. How much trouble would I be in if she knew my daughter was also glued to Cowboy games too?

by Impatient on Dec 30, 2009 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Grown men doing violence to each other?

Scantily clad women objectified on the sidelines? I think that’s healthy.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 30, 2009 7:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Its very healthy...

Its what America was built upon

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Dec 30, 2009 9:07 PM CST up reply actions  

so you're saying America's healthy?

… bye the way… GOD BLESS AMERICA … and:

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We’re 12 hours ahead of New York here in Thailand, so while you’re making lunch plans, I’m going to be … well… celebrating :)

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Dec 31, 2009 7:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Happy new year Your Holiness, DalaiLuke

or is that “DalaiPuke” tonight??

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Your Holiness doesn't recall

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Jan 1, 2010 12:03 AM CST up reply actions  

It's funny how he says it too

“In fact, they haven’t won since 1996” as if it’s a new development that no one knew about.

by Joon on Dec 30, 2009 6:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Normally Prissyco and Jugular are pretty hard on the Cowboys.

Sometimes I just want to reach through the computer screen and thump that big honkin’ noggin of Prissyco’s. However, it’s hard to deny what the Cowboys are doing right now. Even the haters know they’ll look like fools if they don’t give any love at all to the Boys.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 30, 2009 3:31 PM CST reply actions  

BTW, just heard Tech fired Mike Leach.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 30, 2009 3:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Roy Williams

Gained alot of my respect with those comments. Alot.

2010 is OUR year.

by Unique on Dec 30, 2009 3:34 PM CST reply actions  

+1, but he IS going to have to prove it on the field.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Dec 30, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

But it’s such a pleasure to hear he is putting effort to improve.

I always wonder if the pressure of playing for the Cowboys is too much for him and he tries to do TOO much. Ya know?

2010 is OUR year.

by Unique on Dec 30, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeh, I definitely agree that he's pressing..

On that slant he was turning to look where he was going to run. He’s pressing to make a big play there.

On the interception, Fish implied he just ran a lazy route and the ball was on him. That’s just bad route running.

Either way, the first step is to realize it’s him. Hope these comments indicate a move in that direction.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Dec 30, 2009 5:30 PM CST up reply actions  

RW said

He didn’t put his hands up in time, that it was poor technique on his part.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 30, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry.... I'm just not buying the excuses

I hope I’m wrong. But, players make plays. They don’t continually make the same excuses. It’s getting old, and this team is ready to win now, not when he’s done with the jug machines.

by Road Warrior on Dec 30, 2009 7:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Excuses?

Not sure I get you. Admitting that you used bad technique is owning up.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 30, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Ummmmmm,

you’re making it sound like this is the first time he’s made comments like this. It’s not. To me, it sounds like the pressure is really getting to him, thus making him even less effective.

I’m willing to admit I’m wrong. Let’s see him prove it.

by Road Warrior on Dec 30, 2009 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Well I agree with that

He has to do more than issue mea culpas. But I guess for me, after TO, it’s refreshing to hear a guy admit he has a problem.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 30, 2009 8:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Dunk.. we're on the same side here...

but we’ve both been around long enough to know… this time of year… you either get it or you don’t.

Roy will continue to get his chances. We can’t cut him out of the offense.

I’ll just be interested to see where this will go… because an effective Roy (even a little bit) will go a long way to our 6th ring. Then again, a drop in the 4th quarter of our next playoff game could be backbreaking.

Just ask Crayton… and he only ran a bad route in the Giants playoff game.

by Road Warrior on Dec 30, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Yup

It’s go/no go time.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 30, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Roy's right The whole route was poor technique, culminating in the late hands.

He didn’t put his hands up in time because he was behind the whole way: late out of his cut, late looking for the ball, late putting his hands up . . . That’s a timing route all the way, and his was a bit behind Romo’s. They’ve been throwing that since before OTA’s.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Dec 31, 2009 9:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Wasn't Irvin pointing this out a couple months ago?

Hope he finally takes some pointers from a HOFer. If you put Irvin’s heart in RW, he would be a beast.

by illcowboy on Dec 31, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions  

+ 1 ... Remember "Cowboy up" ..

Millar said, “Its time for ME to Cowboy up!” .. Personal accountability is a characteristic of a champion. I hope he plays his best ball when it really counts!! He has been trying to work through it, and he is working hard and now saying the right things.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 30, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions  

roy

Shouldn’t have heard feelings when his minutes are decreased. Just not throwing to Roy isn’t good enough. We need to reduce his minutes. Not throwing to your one of your starting WR makes you predictable on offense. Greg Williams said it an interview. You where to find Roy.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2009 6:02 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

All the drops could work in his favor if he gets his game together.

Noone will be doubling him much, so he should be able to take full advantage.

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 6:27 PM CST up reply actions  

true.

He is getting open, he just needs to catch the football. I like where is head is at.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2009 6:30 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, but it's not week 1 anymore.

Every drop is 10-fold now. It’s only a matter of time before one ‘really’ costs us.

by Road Warrior on Dec 30, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions  

yes sir.

Time for Hurd and Ogletree to get their shot..

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

I'll reserve my praise

I like the words from Williams but let’s see what action comes from them. He’s said the right things before.

by StillHateTheGiants on Dec 31, 2009 9:21 AM CST up reply actions  

I like the fact that ...

Bucky Brooks mentioned T-New. With Jenkins playing so well, Newman has been an invisable man. But he too has played well!

by spadesking131313 on Dec 30, 2009 3:47 PM CST reply actions  

Yep

Needs to tackle a bit better but I don’t think he’s been horrible.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 30, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Austin has a swollen left thumb.

Sounds like nothing major, though.

It doesn’t appear serious but wide receiver Miles Austin has a swollen left thumb. Austin, who did practice, was wearing a wrap on his hand said he’s fine.

ESPNDallas

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 4:13 PM CST reply actions  

Sal Pal on espn97.5/Philly last night

Listen to his pod cast,I knew he’d come on jocking the Eagles and singing praises for the team with the 50yr drought. The hosts were all AMP’D to hear him pick all the ‘Boys have accomplished thus far apart.Strange thing was he wouldn’t pick the game or give a score.Last thing he said was don’t think that they(Dallas)are the same team as last year,this team is different.
After that the Eagles fans started calling in,DeSean is the greatest ,Romo hasn’t won anything.The whole time forgetting only Jerry has been a part of the last 12 non-playoff seasons.

by psychodad on Dec 30, 2009 4:31 PM CST reply actions  

Did I miss a QB sneak somewhere?
“We’ve done a variety of things and have to keep doing a variety of things to be successful at it,” Garrett said. “You don’t want to make it too easy on the defense certainly. On short-yardage situations we’ve been successful handing it to the deep back, successful handing it to the fullback and quarterback sneak as well. That’s got to be a part of the arsenal and it is part of it.”.

Apparently I did ….

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Dec 30, 2009 4:36 PM CST reply actions  

Me too

And this is just silly:
“Romo had almost identical numbers to Rodgers and he takes a lot fewer sacks.”
Umm, the fact that Rodgers put up those numbers while getting smacked around makes him more worthy to be in. He’s good.

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Dec 30, 2009 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Not really.

The only reason Romo has less sacks than Rodgers is purely because of his ability to avoid them. That ability, added to the other stats, says that Romo is more worthy.

by danielt on Dec 30, 2009 6:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Rodgers isn't some old stiff Bledsoe back there

He just gets horrible protection. While our line leaks at times, overall they’re average.
I agree Romo avoids a lot of sacks and makes them look better-that’s a given

(Part of my “Realist” tag stems from 2007 when everyone was talking about how great our OLine was, esp. after the Pro Bowl selected 3 of them, and I tried to point out that actually Romo and Barber made them look a lot better than they really were. Not a popular opinion at the time!)

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Dec 30, 2009 10:07 PM CST up reply actions  

some of those sacks were on Rodgers

they were having protection issues but sometimes he hung onto the ball too long, looking to make a play downfield… he’s gotten better lately but a lot of those sacks he could have avoided…. so it cuts both ways…

by scottmaui on Dec 30, 2009 11:14 PM CST up reply actions  

That's also part of the reason why his passer rating is so high.

Because he wouldn’t throw the ball away and would take the sack instead. I’m not taking away from his skills, because he’s great.

by Baked Potato Soup on Dec 31, 2009 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

This is complete crap

Just kidding. Actually this is precisely the criticsm Rodgers has taken from the local writers.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 7:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Couldn't you argue the exact same thing for Romo in prior seasons

Despite his fast release (which I have seen timed favourably against Dan Marino) – he got sacked a lot looking for the big play downfield.

Hasn’t done it as much this year.

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Jan 2, 2010 5:02 AM CST up reply actions  

Thinking the same thing

but no biggie that Romo didn’t make the Pro-Bowl. Aikman was often overshadowed by Young’s and Favre’s big numbers when Dallas was winning Super Bowls.

by spadesking131313 on Dec 30, 2009 7:22 PM CST up reply actions  

yes last week he snuck around 2 or 3 redskins..

To throw a perfect pass to ROY.

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Dec 30, 2009 5:07 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

The Choice Razorback carries, perhaps?

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 30, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions  

hmmm.

There is definitely a physical issue. We are not getting any push on short yardage on either side and it is usually someone from the second level making a play. I think we need to run short yardage plays out of a different formation. Maybe the 3 wide or a spread formation.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Dec 30, 2009 6:09 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Also seems to be a timing issue.

I noticed that the Redskins DL got a much quicker start off the snap than our OL. Was the ball not snapped when it was supposed to? Are we just trying to avoid false starts?

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 31, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions  

JJT and Skip ...

And I didn’t think I could hold ESPN in lower regards than I already did.

by northtexan95 on Dec 30, 2009 5:34 PM CST reply actions  

When TO dropped

a ball — and he dropped plenty — he chirped and bitched so he kept getting thrown to.

With Roy, he owns the problem and says he will work harder to gain the QB’s confidence.\

Show us, Roy.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Dec 30, 2009 8:18 PM CST reply actions  

well......T.O dropped balls

……but also caught enough for double digit TD’s per year and over 1,000 yards each of the seasons he was here. And by the way, if he would’ve been the one blocking on Witten 69 yard catch against Washington, that would’ve been a TD……RW didn’t blockl any of the 2 defenders.

I agree, the ideal payer would be the numbers T.O produced with William’s (nowadays) attitude, but that is not the case…..If T.O was cut because of his attitude, then William’s should be benched for his production, or cut……he has the 2nd lowest % in the league of catches on ballas thrown at him, that is not acceptable production at all.

by ManTab on Dec 30, 2009 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

That statement is actually not true...

RW blocked and kept Witten from being tackled at the forty and then tried to take out another defender from a bad angle

A+ for effort and an A+ for effect

I root for the guy, his realism strikes a chord with. Soon I hope his play will as well !!

by Elks83 on Dec 31, 2009 3:47 AM CST up reply actions  

+1

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 31, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions  

To was cut because of attitude coupled with

declining skills. RW’s skills probably haven’t declined, just his confidence. That can come back at any point whereas TO is simply never going to be the same again.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 7:29 AM CST up reply actions  

mostly correct

However, T0 got 3 times as many targets, remember he was thrown to like 19 times in one game and caught 6. Roy can put up TO #s if he had that kind of attempts.

by TONYINCC on Dec 31, 2009 7:33 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Agree

TO would have bitched, even when he did drop the ball and held the offense hostage – ‘throw to me or I’ll take my case public then use it to get the locker room to pick sides.’

Roy, to his credit, owned up to it – after a while. Only way to correct the perception now is to change the reality.

Always be more than you appear and never appear to be more than you are

by tdships on Dec 31, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I sort of agree with the pundits..

Philly is the last team that I want to see in the NFC playoffs. I think that the other teams are either less explosive, or are just not playing their best football.

by Diws on Dec 30, 2009 9:16 PM CST reply actions  

If we beat the Eagles Sunday, we will be the favorites to win the NFC

by most pundits… especially if we do it convincingly, but even a close/ugly win…

by scottmaui on Dec 30, 2009 11:16 PM CST reply actions  

Theres so much east bias its ridiculous

If the Cowboys or Eagles or Giants play remotely well for any stretch of games, experts instantly think one of us is going to the superbowl. Honestly, recent history shows december play is almost irrelevant – its all about whose hot in january. And the last decade has been dominated by qb/safety duos – brady/harrison, Ben/Polamalu, Manning/Sanders (for one year), McNabb/Dawkins. Add in Warner whose teams always perform well in the playoffs and Ed Reed and Baltimore and you have 8 out of the last 9 or so superbowl winners and over half the championship game teams.

I’m not trying to be a hater, but i think this nfc is talented and there will be 6 teams that could very well ALL win the conference. They all (imo) have a close to equal shot. We all ahve problems. Philly can be slowed by a good defense (potentially ours) that has the capability to stay with their receivers. Defensively, Philly and on that note the rest of the conference isn’t nearly as good as us. Meanwhile, we have shown that penalties, oline play and drops can completely derail our offense despite solid play by Romo. Its very likely we will have to win at least one game putting up just 17 points.

I’m not saying we can’t win it, just that to declare the winner of our game with philly the clear cut favorite is crazy.

by foyesboys on Dec 31, 2009 12:29 AM CST reply actions  

WAIT A MINUTE!

I thought once we solved December we were golden, and now you’re saying it’s actually January?? When did this all happen? Yer killin me here Foye…

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 7:32 AM CST up reply actions  

East Bias? While I'd never even try to defend the mediots, in this case I'd say no.

Based on three things:

1. The media LOVED the 49ers for better than a decade.
2. What west coast team is even worthy of consideration? Arizona? The media loved them last year. San Diego? Isn’t that the media’s choice to win it all this year? Outside of these two teams, you have Oakland, SF, Seattle, throw in Denver and KC and … you get the point, the strength this year is to the EAST.
3. Recently, it’s been East Coast teams winning it all = NE, Pittsburgh, NYGiants … so what do you expect from a group known for their love of bandwagons?

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Dec 31, 2009 8:15 AM CST up reply actions  

9ers is a different story

you know what I mean. Year after year afteryear, if the eagles, giants or cowboys win 3 straight games, they are instantly viewed as a championship threat. The Giants won ONE GAME AGAINST WASHINGTON and suddenly they’re playing like a playoff team. Yet these teams rarely win their conference (twice out of 9 years).

Last year week 2 there were many in the media who thought Dallas and Philly were the two best teams – they were quickly proven very wrong.

I don’t know, it just bothers me, especially the love for a philly team that consistently falls short of their expectations. Since when is great offensive play and poor defense a recipe to playoff success?

by foyesboys on Dec 31, 2009 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

the media did not love AZ last year

the media said they had no chance at all of doing anything in the playoffs. They didn’t give AZ any credit till they beat philly.

by foyesboys on Dec 31, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed ... AZ was given no chance in the playoffs

… and given the way they were playing down the stretch, they didn’t deserve much.

… but in the SB week, I was shocked at how many mediots were pumping them up. I know, I know… it’s their job to promote. I’m just pointing out that the media like a bandwagon, east or west.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Jan 1, 2010 12:07 AM CST up reply actions  

not to be a jerk...

but they were one of two teams left…of course they were pumping them up…

by foyesboys on Jan 1, 2010 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that it is a wide-open NFC playoff field this year.

I think a win this Sunday would be a great confidence booster, but even with a loss, we could very well heat up again in the playoffs.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Dec 31, 2009 9:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Jay Ratliff's 1st sack vs. the Skins

rewatching Sunday’s game, when Rat gets his first sack, I literally LOL’d. This play cracked me up when I was actually watching the game too. On the live play, he seems to come out of nowhere and just flattens Campbell, which is funny enough, but then when they show the focus on him in the replay, he’s double teamed, and runs up into both guys, and then he just relaxes and takes a step back, and they both just kind of let up and turn slightly away from him like ‘oh he’s out of the play who else can i block?’ and then Campbell holds the ball for one second too long, and Rat just charges untouched between his double team and accelerates into Campbell and drives him into the ground. It is such a sly move, he didn’t overpower them, he just fooled them. Nick Cole will have his hands full.

by scottmaui on Dec 31, 2009 12:30 AM CST reply actions  

Nice! I wonder why he didn't do his sack smash dance on that one..

I saw a dog today. Have you seen a dog? You probably have. How was school? Was it fun? Did you get a lot of homework? Huh? Do you have any friends? Do you have a best friend? Does he have a big coat, too?

by Aaron Novinger on Dec 31, 2009 8:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Auburn

I figured he didn’t do it, since they were teammates at Auburn. He sure did it on the second sack, though. I love it, but I’m always worried he’s going to wear himself out or throw out his back when he does it.

by JC56 on Dec 31, 2009 9:03 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm always worried he'll crack the Earth's surface.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

by Aaron Novinger on Jan 1, 2010 12:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Also

I love that article on Roy, and think thats definitely the attitude he needs to have.

by foyesboys on Dec 31, 2009 12:30 AM CST reply actions  

This is the best comment from Roy

“That’s not on them. I don’t blame them. I blame myself. I’ve got to get my crap together and try to ride this thing and help us get into the playoffs.”

That came right after how he said that he didn’t get a look, then he said something I didn’t expect but was equally as good
“If I continue to do the things that I’ve been doing,” Williams said. “…Then I’m going to mess around and be on the sideline, playing special teams.”

Don’t want to bad mouth special teams but he admits that if he doesn’t produce he should be on the sideline. Considering the WR we had last year, we would never hear those words even if he dropped 100 passes for every completion. I like Roy, I still think he can get it done and if he means the words he is saying when you mix in the natural talent he has, our offense might just explode soon..in a good way

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Dec 31, 2009 3:22 AM CST reply actions  

i do like his attitude

Considering T0(that’s a zero) has never had anything bad happen that was his fault in his career.

However, roy did go on to talk about how the fans are mesmorized by the scoreboard and didn’t get loud like other stadiums. It was a dumb comment whether true or not and I am suprised bspn doesn’t have it as their lead story.

by TONYINCC on Dec 31, 2009 7:41 AM CST via mobile up reply actions  

QB of the defense

Is it just me or does the ENTIRE `Boys D look 100% better now that Hamlin`s back and playing well? Him and Sensabaugh are totally locking down the deep middle right now enabling our blue chip corners to work the outsides and make plays on the ball. That Jenkins pick against the skins was the direct culmination of this strength.

I would pay ANYTHING for us to beat the heck out of the iggles this coming sunday. Oh and Romo`s awesome but unfortunately he`s only the 4th best this year( Rodger`s just as elusive, his O-line`s a nightmare), maybe next year

by voidhelix on Dec 31, 2009 3:46 AM CST reply actions  

I never thought I'd find someone I disliked more than Skip Bayless

Then I see JJT on television….

Didn’t know he was on that show these days. I guess shoddy journalism gets you on TV as long as you are a shock journalist.

by mhuff13 on Dec 31, 2009 8:31 AM CST reply actions  

Sensabaugh

Has Sensabaugh earned a big offer from Jerry? I think we overpaid Hamlin, and I sure don’t want to see that big of a deal for Sensabaugh, but I hate to take a chance again on a rookie or one of the back-ups. Sensi’s such an upgrade over old Roy, but how much do they offer, especially if they’re planning on drafting safety(s) again this year?

by JC56 on Dec 31, 2009 9:07 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah he's been awesome

this’ll be interesting for sure.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 9:15 AM CST up reply actions  

I think...

while Hamlin has been solid, that Dallas would really like to get a guy that has the chance to be a playmaker.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 31, 2009 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Hamlin

I agree, but what do you do with Hamlin. I think you draft a FS early, and let him play behind Hamlin until / unless he can outplay him. I don’t think you even try to get rid of Hamlin, though.

by JC56 on Dec 31, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

were not drafting a saftey with a high pick

Stop already….we r locked into his contract unless jerry decides to unload him in a uncapped year…if jerry resigns sensabaugh that definately won’t happen.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 31, 2009 3:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Will you stop?

“We won’t darft a safety stop already” “Why draft an offensivelineman, we have no luck in the early rounds.”

If you have a badass safety that you think can be a game changer for years to come, you draft him if he’s valued.

I think there are three things you can’t have enough of in this league defensive back depth, offensive line depth, and pass rushers.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 31, 2009 4:22 PM CST up reply actions  

And cheerleadera

can never have too much cheerleader depth.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 4:41 PM CST up reply actions  

When it comes to cheerleaders, I'll take quality over quantity

Here’s a question for you: if given a choice in the next draft between a “Polamalu” type difference maker at safety, or a good/solid/fundamental not amazing LT … what would you take?

I’d lean LT, but drafting a safety to lead this defense for the next decade wouldn’t hurt.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Jan 1, 2010 12:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Safety for sure

So I had to establish the rules and regulations of the game...85!

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 1, 2010 8:17 AM CST up reply actions  

The safety

Dallas already has a good/solid/fundamentally sound LT in Free

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Isn't it interesting that teams with playmaking safeties

are typically in the Super Bowl? Troy Polamalu, Rodney Harrison, Adrian Wilson, Brian Dawkins, Bob Sanders….we don’t have that at safety. I would try to get a playmaker at that position. I wanted the boys to get Delmas but he wasn’t available. Football Outsiders rates 2 of the top rookies as guyswho were on the Cowboy’s radar, Unger and Delmas. Crap.

"Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends."

by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Dec 31, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

I was a big Delmas fan as well

He’s playing really well for the Lions as a rook.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Dec 31, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Hopefully Jerry realizes

That we are very close to an elite defense, and most of our defensive players are still on the good side of their careers. We still need a top-flight safety and a three-down ILB. It would be amazing, if a little unrealistic, to have both within the fold by the time next season starts.

Upgrade to a BTB Platinum Account to view this signature.

by accidental innuendo on Dec 31, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Teams build through the draft

And plug holes with FA’s. At the safety position we’ve been forced to man it exclusively through FA. That’s a short-term proposition. We’ve paid more than enough attention to LB in the draft and had considerable focus on CB. Now it’s time for a play making Safety.

I’m OK with Sensabaugh because he’s steady and that’s what SS requires. Hamlin seems to disappear for games at a time, which given our recent history at the position is OK, but we need plays from the FS position more than adequacy.

 I was bullish on Delmas as well, who seems to be the leader of an admittedly weak Rookie class at Safety. They guy I really wanted was Phillips from MIA last year that the Giants took. Shame about his knees

Always be more than you appear and never appear to be more than you are

by tdships on Dec 31, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

On the offensive side Crayton and RW need to step up...

Just like our last meeting the Eagles will do there best to take away Witten and Austin….Remember Austin just had that once long catch….Austin needs to increase that total this time around…Crayton needs to actually show up this game. We need contributions from the #3 and #4 WR this game…..Ogletree once again has to be a factor. If you remember he torched the Eagles D with the WR screens our last meeting.

On defense, we have to double Desean Jackson. We did a great job last time doubling him. We have to do the same or he will torch us.

"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham

by Boyzfan94 on Dec 31, 2009 11:20 AM CST reply actions  

That might not be exactly fair.

We done alot of 2 and 3 man routes and a good mix of max protect. If we run 3 man routes it’s going to be Austin, Witten, and RW.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Dec 31, 2009 5:50 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Austin's role has completely changed

since that last meeting. As Raf wrote after the Raiders game, Garrett in that game finally decided to make Austin the focus of the offense and to get him matchup problems as the “#1” WR. This isn’t to say that Austin was ignored by Romo and Garrett in the first meeting, but it is pretty clear that the focus on Austin has certainly increased. As such, I would expect his targets to go up, and his catches to go up as well.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 31, 2009 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

they need to feed him the ball

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 31, 2009 8:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Two games is NOT a winning streak.

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Dec 31, 2009 11:55 AM CST reply actions  

I didn't bring my

Dictionary of Official Sports Terms with me. What officially constitutes a streak?

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Dec 31, 2009 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Philly fans know about streaks

50 years without a championship makes them experts at streaks. Losing streaks that is. And how many SB trophies do they have. Oh no none :)

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Dec 31, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

owned

Drago says, "We must break you!"

by APerfectStar on Jan 1, 2010 4:08 PM CST up reply actions  

If you can believe Wikipedia...

The smallest “winning streak” is 3 consecutive wins

Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character. - John Wooden

by BishopWest on Dec 31, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I would say 3 games, but regardless: beating a reeling Saints team and the lame duck Redskins sure as hell doesn’t count as a winning streak. If you guys beat us, fine. Say winning streak. But you wouldn’t say losing two games is a losing streak, would you? No, it’s back to back wins/losses or “consecutive” wins. Two games in a row is nothing to celebrate. Now, two wins is great and all that, but don’t sing the praises of a team for winning two in a row that just lost two in a row. You’re still 2-2 over your last 4.

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Dec 31, 2009 5:10 PM CST reply actions  

Saints weren't reeling until we thumped them.

The Tampa game was the hangover.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Dec 31, 2009 5:55 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Oh, so the Saints weren’t reeling when they beat the Redskins? You know, when the freaking REDSKINS took them to overtime, and the only reason they got a chance in overtime was because YOUR CURRENT KICKER couldn’t make a field goal I can make?

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 1, 2010 10:47 PM CST up reply actions  

(oh, and the Falcons by 3 and the Rams by 5)

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 1, 2010 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

dear yawn ...

when you beat someone, anyone with a winning record you might start your whining …

until then, trying to take away from us beating a 13-0 team sounds pathetic

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Jan 2, 2010 4:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Did you seriously just claim that we haven’t beaten anyone with a winning record?

Do you have a functioning brain?

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 2, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Redskins played well that game and were at home. They actually scored points. I watched every Saints game this year.

I work in New Orleans and this place was going nuts. It was a home game at night and the fans were lathered up. We came in and shut their asses down and took the crowd out of it. Do you see the look on their faces after the game. It looked the same as the Colts looked after their loss. Its hard to get up for the next game. Thats what happened to the Saints against TB.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Jan 2, 2010 6:09 PM CST up reply actions  

you know after all this

a win Sunday and we win the division …….so does all the win streaks really matter at this point?

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 31, 2009 7:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I find it ironic that an Eagles fan would be so concerned with semantics.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Dec 31, 2009 7:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Why? Is it because you don’t know the meaning of the word “ironic”?

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 1, 2010 9:39 PM CST up reply actions  

lol

So I had to establish the rules and regulations of the game...85!

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 2, 2010 10:38 AM CST up reply actions  

How about this...

We’ve actually beaten a team that’s going to be in the playoffs, have you?

You have a chance, so until you do, go back to bleeding green nation, rewatch all your superbowl winning games(that shouldn’t take you long) and shut your mouth!

If you smeeeeeeeeeeeel what the bat is cooking!

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Dec 31, 2009 8:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly who has Philly beat this year?

CAR = losing record
KAN = losing record
TB = losing record
WAS = losing record
NYG = non-playoff team (8 wins)
CHI = losing record
WAS = losing record
ATL = non-playoff team (8 wins)
NYG = non-playoff team (8 wins)
SF = losing record
DEN = yet to be determined (8 wins)

At least DAL beat…
PHI = playoff team (11 wins)
NOR = playoff team (13 wins)

by BishopWest on Jan 1, 2010 9:16 AM CST up reply actions  

wow I didn't realise that ....interesting!

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, super extremely valid points there except…

1) We still have you to play yet
2) The Broncos may still yet make the playoffs, and if they don’t, they will have missed the playoffs because, you know, we beat them.
3) We single-handedly destroyed any chances of the Giants making the playoffs by obliterating them twice.

So, yeah. We haven’t beaten any playoff teams yet (with the keyword being “yet”), but we might on Sunday and we’ve kept teams out of the playoffs, so I’m pretty sure that counts for something.

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 1, 2010 9:43 PM CST up reply actions  

OK so beating a playoff team is good but keeping teams out of the playoffs isn’t? Got it.

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Jan 2, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes, we say two games is a losing streak around here.

That means we go three real time weeks without a win and nobody’s happy.

by illcowboy on Jan 1, 2010 1:23 AM CST up reply actions  

This may be the dumbest post ever

(1) Who made you the streak expert?
(2) What does it really matter, especially to an Eagles fan?
(3) Why are you here with your lame theories?

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 11:52 AM CST up reply actions  

I can answer the first question

It was voted on by an international panel of “streak” celebrities who each possess “streak” degrees. Yom won in the closest vote in “streak” voting history, with a winning margin of 2 votes.

So I had to establish the rules and regulations of the game...85!

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 2, 2010 10:41 AM CST up reply actions  

hmmmmm
On short-yardage situations we’ve been successful handing it to the deep back, successful handing it to the fullback and quarterback sneak as well. That’s got to be a part of the arsenal and it is part of it."

Did I miss a game this year when we actually did a QB sneak? We do way to much pulling and stunting on 3-1 and 4-1………why can’t we run straight at someone without all the moving parts? Seems less complicated and should atleast help them focus more on just blowing off the line and moveing the defender.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Dec 31, 2009 7:28 PM CST reply actions  

Correct - No QB sneaks this year

and I can only remember ONE from last year (it did work though)

by BishopWest on Jan 1, 2010 9:18 AM CST up reply actions  

exactly , so how can he say its a big part of the arsenal? lol

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 12:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Arsenals can store munitions for YEARS

But we can check with the Iggles troll for exactly how long it’s permissable.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 2:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Hey

he is the elected streak expert, so give him a little respect please.

So I had to establish the rules and regulations of the game...85!

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 2, 2010 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Speak for yourself

I’ve never handled a man.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

lol lol lol

But he was saying that you were handled by a man.

So I had to establish the rules and regulations of the game...85!

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 2, 2010 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Facinating that one pundit lists Dallas' defensive secondary as a concern, and another lists it as a strength, while mentioning how many turnovers they get off of pressure.

Makes you wonder if either of them actually watch the games.

I think if you put two of my best seasons together it wouldn't come up with the numbers he's going to have at the end of the season. -Troy Aikman on Tony Romo

by Big D Bam Bam on Dec 31, 2009 9:43 PM CST reply actions  

I caught that, too.

Not sure a lot of these mediots got the memo that Thong isn’t on the team anymore.

by illcowboy on Jan 1, 2010 1:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes

Recent FanPosts

97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui