Combine Ramblings - Part II
Now that the Defense has rested (yep, made that one up myself), it's now safe to look at their performances and make some ridiculously biased and asinine comments about who could land in Dallas' lap on this side of the ball at #51 or later. I'll also call out some notably good or bad performances in drills, just because I can...
Ron Brace: anyone who has read my posts on BTB knows I am an advocate of finding a true Nose Guard to displace the undersized Jay Ratliff and move him to the base End spot to take advantage of his quickness and motor. Well, Ron Brace sure looks like that guy. He lifted strong (32 reps on the bench) and ran like the wind. Okay, the last part NOT SO MUCH, but who cares??? He's a 334-pound behemoth, for goodness' sake. Trust me, if he is having to run 40 yards during games, your defense has MUCH bigger problems than his timed speed. Plus, rumors of his back issues shouldn't keep him from playing. John Henderson, Marcus Stroud, Casey Hampton and Jamaal Williams have all had back issues at one time or another and they all turned out okay. Keep in mind, this is pick number 51 we are talking about.
Jarron Gilbert: had a good Combine and is built like a true 3-4 End. I'm trying to find more clips of him on the net given that he played at San Jose State without much fanfare. He might be a nice late round pick.
DL: what really ticks me off about this group is the sheer number of DT's who DID NOT participate in the drills. Of the notable interior guys over 320 pounds, Sammie Lee Hill chose only to run, Chris Baker only lifted and ran, and most guys just sat on the sidelines. What happened to position drills you jerkweeds? I am of the opinion that anyone who gets an invite to the Combine should be required to do all of the drills or they can keep their lazy butts on the couch at home while others get a shot at the spotlight!! The Combine is becoming a failure due to so many of these guys coming in to do a half-assed job! Okay, sorry, I am returning to my happy place now...With Dallas needing a big body, Tom Ciskowski's guys will be traveling to lots of pro days to see how these fatso goo-bodies can do in the phone booth.
Jasper Brinkley: really helped himself by running a 4.72 40 and at 252 pounds, showing good strength with 26 reps and he reminds me a lot of Jeremiah Trotter. Brinkley is a thumper and was an intimidator at South Carolina. He's a true 3-4 ILB. He has also seemingly recovered from a previous injury. I like this guy!!!
Scott McKillop: Pittsburgh Panther who didn't stand out for anything other than maybe his height, which surprised some at just under 6'1". Here is another example of a guy the computer wouldn't rank highly based on his triangles, but one that scouts love because of what he brings on game day. He should be there at #51, but may also be there in round 3.
LB's: clearly, this is the strength of this draft, with guys like Maualuga, Curry, Laurinitis, Cushing and possibly Sintim all being 1st round picks. If you add the guys from the DE workouts who could transition to 3-4 rush LB's like Everette Brown, Larry English and Aaron Maybin, it is obvious that scouts are looking most closely at this very deep group of LB's. Curry emerged as the star of the Combine. He had a 37-inch vertical, benched well with 25 reps and ran a 4.56 40 at 254 pounds! Coupled with his eye catching on-field productivity, he looks every bit like a true blue-chip guy. Personally, I still feel he is better suited as an OLB in a 4-3 than a rush LB in a 3-4.
Rashad Johnson: had a poor workout, especially his 4.56 40 time, which for me isn't such a bad thing because I think he'd be a great fit in Dallas. He has shown the ability to make plays on the ball while it is in the air unmatched by anyone else in this draft except maybe Darcel McBath (who ran a 4.57). Both had more INT's in 11 or 12 games than anyone in Dallas had in 16.
Vontae Davis: highly doubtful he would be around at #51, but he is notable because he was probably the ONLY well-regarded CB in Indy who didn't lay an egg. He ran a 4.46 with 25 reps on the bench while showing smooth hip turn (this is why Anthony Henry is a terrible press corner) to run with receivers.
DB's: this has to be the most uninspiring group of DB's to come through the draft in years (Kareem Larrimore would have been a 1st round prospect in this group!). Kudos to Dallas for NAILING IT with the Orlando Scandrick pick last year. He would surely have been a 2nd rounder in this draft. This year's class ran slow...really slow...across the board. The CB's showed stiff hips while the safeties were just plain awful in drills (those that actually participated). Malcolm Jenkins cost himself 20 million dollars this weekend. I would urge that Dallas look hard at the available Free Agent safeties for a stopgap while moving Henry to FS. There are no impact safeties that jump out at you in this draft, which was hurt badly by guys like Taylor Mays and Myron Rolle choosing to stay in school.
So, there you have it. The Combine is in the books, and I for one, was really pleased with the coverage from NFL Network. That said, the invitees not participating in so much of the event was a real downer and the NFL needs to step in and establish some minimum requirements, given that so many other players who would participate in the event, get nudged out by those who come and do bupkiss.
It's a good year for o-linemen, WR's and, as mentioned, linebackers. There are very few prototypical pocket passing QB's and it's a horrible year for corners and safeties. This is a great draft to mine the later rounds for depth and Dallas is in a great position to do just that with what looks to be 11 picks (after the compensatories are awarded). I hope they choose wisely.
GO COWBOYS!!!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
82 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think NFLN focused too much on the 40's
Seriously, 2-3 hours of 40’s gets really old. I don’t know how you could be happy with a corner who ran 4.46 and disappointed in a safety who ran a 4.56 but that’s beside the point. Good write-up.
Good question
I assume you meant Rashad Johnson, who I am a fan of, but who I said had a crappy workout.
The consensus on Johnson was that because he had more of a CB’s body (5’11" and 200 pounds) that he would run better than 4.56. His other 40 was even slower (4.64?).
On the flipside, I wasn’t “happy” per se with Vontae Davis, but singled him out for being the only well known CB who ran in the area of where draftniks were hoping he would run.
I hope that makes sense. Thanks for helping me clarify.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
He bulked up for the combine...
He was at 187 during the college season….He put on quite a bit of weight to take on the physical jump that the NFL does.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 25, 2009 6:17 PM CST up reply actions
ummm, spending afternoon at Krispy Kreams wasn't the prescribed way of bulking up 15lbs in a few months...
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 25, 2009 8:51 PM CST up reply actions
NOW YOU TELL ME!!!!
Where were you when I needed you 8 years ago?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Alphonso Smith looked alright.
Especially when he did his Deion impression after catching a ball in one of the drills. That was pretty funny.
"If your good at something never do it for free." - The Joker
Not worried about Rashad Johnson.
He made a lot of plays for a good team in a tough conference. He has really good ball skills, great instincts and has a high football IQ. The Cowboys are severely missing a player like that in the secondary.
"If your good at something never do it for free." - The Joker
Was this the first year that the combune was held in the new building.
It seems with the exception of a few, everyones times looked slower. Is this turf a little slower. Its one thing when your guy is slower but when everyone looks slower it makes you wonder. If indeed the feeling amoung the players is this turf is slower then next year nobody will run the forty. One last question, if someone is able to get that information, I would also be interested in if the field is consistent.
+1
good point hiafex.. the official times were a lot slower than the unofficial times…especially for Knox.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 25, 2009 6:49 PM CST up reply actions
True, does the turf set up better for heavier guys.
I notice the big guys seemed a little faster this year. Im really just speculating. I still believe if this turf gets a bad rap in any way less and less people will run. I bet you now that less corners will run next year. Im also wondering how many of these guys will fair on their pro days. If many of them run significantly faster on another field its over.Agents of next years players wont let them run.
If you watched closely and in HD...
you could see the turf was the most heavily colored (sideline) and seemed to give a bit too much and it made the runners’ feet look heavier thn they may have been.
So, I think you could be on to something here. If the pro day times are vastly different than the electronic times from Indy, it will definitely become an issue.
As for the WR’s and their times, it really doesn’t tell you anything, because on the old stadium floor, those that ran 4.38 this year might have run a 4.25 on the old floor.
Either way, some of these guys made big mistakes while carb loading up to the Combine. Slow 40’s combined with few stellar performances on the bench and vertical jump paints a picture of limited athleticism to many scouts.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
It was those crazy red shoes!!!
All the DB’s should have worn them…
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Loved the match races...
Where they super-imposed B.J. Raji and Eisen running at the same time. Eisen should have changed into shorts and running shoes for his 40. He probably could have gotten his time down to 6.25 :-)
Garrett needs to get a clue!
What are you talking about? With those times posted many of them are plummeting now.
They will run for the scouts just not on a field they think will hurt them. I thinks its bullshit propaganda that not running at the combine will hurt them. Performing like crap is what really hurts. Everybody has pro days at their school. They will get a chance to perform. Combine is better for unknowns than than college allstars. When your on top you can only go down.
not if everyone is running relatively the same numbers...
better for unknows ?…only all star caliber players are even invited..
Unknowns can make a mark, and go from URFA to 6th-7th rounders…or 5th-6th rounders can go up or down a few rounds…the top 100 don’t move all that much, regardless of 40 times..
Believe me. If your not injured, and bypass the Combine 40, your hurting your draft evaluation. They want to see you running on the same track as others to compare, and sift out bubble players, or comparables…..These scouts at the combine use their own stop watches, and may differ from combine times a bit.. and scouts then will compare those times to pro day times…
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
If Im a CB and my status is all about speed, Im not running on a slow track. Sorry but I tweaked my hammy, see you on my pro day.
+1
I don’t think anyone knew that it was a slow track but next year there will be plenty of speed guys that will defer till their pro day.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 6:36 PM CST up reply actions
Who do you like right now at #51?
1)Based on the combine alone name 3 guys.
2)Based on combine plus actual production during college career, 3 guys.
Feb. 18-24 -- NFL Scouting Combine
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
I need to wait until after some of the pro days
Sorry…I know that sounds like a cop out, but with so many guys not doing drills, running or lifting, I just don’t have enough RELATIVE info to make a guess yet.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
yeah, it's really silly
to do mock drafts before April because of free agency and pro days.
In Romo we Trust
It's silly and a waste of time, true
But it’s just so fun :)
Feb. 18-24 -- NFL Scouting Combine
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Feb 26, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions
+100
I love the draft…I have already been looking for draft magazines even though its still too early..
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 27, 2009 1:45 AM CST up reply actions
yeah....even if our needs change, my draft board doesn't.
so i get a few months to tweak and fine tune it…
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 27, 2009 9:07 AM CST up reply actions
Hmm...
1) Terrence Taylor, 37 reps at 315+ pounds nice…David Bruton, Fastest safety….Jarron Gilbert, guy probably helped himself the most
2) Patrick Chung( Moore won’t make it there), Eric Wood, Clay Matthews to play ILB
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 2:18 AM CST reply actions
it's still tough to say who going to drop,....man i hate this...and i can't just name 3, I'll narrow it down to 23 ....lol
DE/OLB/TE Conner Barwin
ILB- Jasper Brinkley
SS- William Moore
DE- Jarron Gilbert
DE- Ziggy Hood
CB/FS- Sean Smith
OC/OG- Alex Mack
OC/OG/OT- Max Unger
ILB- Clint Sintim
OT- Eben Britton
OT- William Beatty
OT- Jamon Meredith
DE/OLB- Robert Ayers
DE/OLB – Michael Johnson
WR- Brian Robiskie
WR- Hakeem Nicks
WR- Kenny Britt
WR- Juquin Iglesias
OG- Duke Robinson
FS- Louis Delmas
CB- Darius Butler
NT- Ron Brace
SS- Patrick Chung
I am pretty confident that if we stay at # 51….One of these players will be a Dallas Cowboy in a few months.
I know you really like him
But he could be there in round 3 too! ILB’s are kind of like brunette’s in that regard; they are just as important to your sex life (or defensive success), but people’s attention always seem to drift toward the blondes and redheads (and skill players) first.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Dallas pulled that off last year with Scandrick, why not again?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
thats not a good analogy though
Scandrick slid last year because if a questionable character. McKillop’s character is outstanding.
A better example would be when we stole Witten in the 3rd, no way in hell should he have lasted that long.
In Romo we Trust
McKillop has questionable height
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
But...you're right, I like your analogy better
;-)
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I don't think height for an ILB really matters
I mean Mike Singletary and Zach Thomas were as productive as they come and they were under 6-0 so I can’t see an ILB sliding too far just because he isn’t 6-3 or 6-4, it seems ridiculous to me.
In Romo we Trust
ILB is a need..
But we can fill it a little later than 3rd round
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 6:38 PM CST up reply actions
Both were 4-3 MLB's
Much different than an ILB in a 3-4 IMO.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
+1
and at this time we need a guy that can go up against OGs because we have a smaller line.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 7:05 PM CST up reply actions
what character concerns?
I thought it was ability to learn, underclassman and smaller school that allowed him to fall. What did he do that caused character concerns
I think I remember
That some thought he was too arrogant…In other words he was too confident as a corner..
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 27, 2009 1:46 AM CST up reply actions
dude...I like McKillop alot...he started out as a late 3rd to early 4th...and now is a late 2nd to mid 3rd....but he's not in my top 50.
or in anyone elses for that matter…
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 10:41 AM CST up reply actions
Top 50's will change
A good example is Will Moore. The guy is in free fall. He could be our 3rd round pick.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
+1
He has his pro day to redeem himself.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 6:37 PM CST up reply actions
I doubt he could do much better at his pro day
as I thought he did well there. The one guy who wasn’t invited to the combine that I’m looking forward to seeing at his pro day is LaRod Stephens-Howling, this kid is a Darren Sproles clone.
In Romo we Trust
McKillop can't so much better at his pro day like Terry said..
heck, his 40 times were pretty much where i expected it, and i doubt he’s faster than the reported times..
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 27, 2009 9:09 AM CST up reply actions
Just curious...
Do you think that WR, OG, and C are still possibilities at #51 considering Austin,Hurd, and Proctor have been tendered? Maybe this will whittle your list down a bit. I actually like this and am hoping these offers mean NT will be a top if not the top priority at this pick.
Game Recognize Game
by pretty ricky on Feb 26, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions
I would say WR is most definately not in our plans at # 51 or in the first 4 rounds, and would be severely disappointed if we did pick one before then.
Unless we have plans of cutting TO, which I don’t think we do, and even if we did, WR isn’t a priority selection in round 2. If we trade or release Crayton, I can see us getting a slot type WR later on. I don’t see Hurd being kept as a 5th-6th WR at that price…but who knows…I wouldn’t of tendered him.
Forget Proctor…I do believe a versatile OC / OG combo guy is most definately still in our plans at # 51, more so than most other positions of need. Kosier is in his last year, Holland was brought in for depth only, imo, and isn’t even being looked at as a future replacement at LG, heck, he might not make the team if he comes in out of shape this summer.. Berger will be gone via FA, and Proctor is being kept around to fight off a rookie for his back roll at C/G…
Unger
Mack
Wood
Luigs
Caldwell
I would be happy with any of them, but in no way are they my prefered choices for # 51..
Those guys are in mix as possible picks at # 51. A few of them may make it to # 69, and be a better value pick though…imo..
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
I can see..
Caldwell and maybe Luigs make it there and more could be there since Centers usually drop a little bit but still Unger and Mack should be gone by the end of the second at least.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 26, 2009 6:46 PM CST up reply actions
Unger and Mack might not even make it out of the first..
I think Caldwell and Luigs will be there at # 69 of the 3rd round.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 7:49 PM CST up reply actions
And I am referring to rnumba1's list of 23 prospects
Game Recognize Game
by pretty ricky on Feb 26, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
Rnumba1
LOL, I like it. Somehow I knew you’d have a tough time limiting yourself to just 6 players.
Gives a rough idea of the level of talent we should be able to acquire with that #51.
Feb. 18-24 -- NFL Scouting Combine
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Feb 26, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions
Well, not knowing exactly what Jerry's has in store for us over the next month, a few things are pretty clear...
OK, This is how I see it. Jerry let all his unrestricted FA go….I don’t believe he plans on signing any of them, and even if he does leave an open door to go back and sign one of them, it won’t be until after the draft, and maybe deep into June if still available. He also put what I feel, are low tenders on Miles Austin, and to some extend Bowen. Hurd is doubtful to receive any attention from other teams,and is really being contained as insurance in case Austin is picked up from another team. I believe Miles Austin will receive interest from other teams, and if I needed a WR, I’d rather have one that is that has shown promise, is still young, NFL ready, and experieced, over a raw, unknown rookie in round 2., as we all know WR is the one of the most difficult to project, and probably one of the hardest to make an immidiate impact
Now we must also take into account that our Strong Safety is being shopped, and will be either traded, or released very soon. And don’t forget we just cut our # 2 QB, and back ups don’t always come at a cheap price at that position……ok ok ok…so here goes…
The level of talent at # 51 is not going to be a great as many people here probably believe. I am not saying the options suck, but thinking we are going to get an immediate starter at that spot might want to Brace for a let down.
The positions on our team that may be open for competition:
DE- Yes, I know, I know….we all want Raliff out there, we need to find an adequate replacement at NT first. Even if Ratliff does go to DE, we’ll need to add, or improve at that position, because Spears is a FA after the season, Bowen may only play for his one year tender, and Hatcher isn’t far behind.
( If Ziggy Hood or Jarron Gilbert are available, it would be hard to pass on those two)
NT- Yes, we have a Pro Bowl NT in Jay Ratliff, but I guess the consensus is we need to better utilize his skillset on the outside, and I agree. We do have options already on the roster in the names of Marcus Spears, and the two futures guys Siavii and Johnson, who both tip the scalls over 320lbs…There is no clear cut NT available at # 51, as I feel Ron Brace is more hype than help, and would be a poor value pick at 51, but would be a decent pick up at 69. Miller of Texas, Hill of Stillman, Baker of Hampton, and Scott of Clemson all are as good, or in my view, better than Ron Brace. That being said, I would not draft a NT at # 51.
SS- OK…Now that it looks like we are close to being without a starting Strong Safety, this position, like most here had already acknowledged, has become a top priority, along with ILB. I’m not part of the move Hamlin to SS, and draft a FS faction here on BTB…FS is alot more difficult at the Pro level, and I’m not sold on any of the potential FS that will be there at # 51. Granted I am under the assumption players like Sean Smith and Louis Delmas will be gone by 51, but if those two were available, I wouldn’t be suprised or upset if we used our pick on either. BUT, that’ assuming Hamlin will move to SS, and Henry isn’t in the plans to make a switch…much too early to determine our Safety plans,otherwise just aquiring depth at FS would be foolish if those moves happen or don’t happen..OK….sorry, this is getting a little long…OK…Back to our main desire…Strong Safety !!!
This position will be open competition, so it’s worthwhile to draft a really good SS…Some picks that may be available at # 51 are William Moore, Chip Vaughn, Courtney Greene, and Patrick Chung, and only William Moore would I use our # 51 selection on. If we SS in round 3, then the other three present good value.
ILB – IF available at #51….( Clint Sintim, Clay Matthews, and Jasper Brinkley ) are the only value picks there. I would seriously consider this our best bet if any are there.
Interior OL- Mack, Robinson, and Unger are the only interior OL that I would use my # 51 on…
OT- Beatty or Britton there, we should maybe consider it, but i’d go interior if those others are around.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 27, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions
I can't find anything in there to disagree with
The 3 ILB’s you named are solid, and very possible to be there at #51 (at least one of them), the 3 interior OL you mentioned ditto, although I think the chance of one of them being available is less than the ILB options. The SS Moore would be a good pick, but I think if it were between the previous names mentioned and Moore, I would take one of the former. I’m not excited by the prospect of taking Brace at #51, but if he’s there and the Cowboys rate him worthy, I wouldn’t be upset. The two DE’s and OT’s, I would be a little worried. (Now watch them take Gilbert at 51)
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Feb 27, 2009 8:19 PM CST up reply actions
I would be very happy if DE- Jarron Gilbert fell to us at # 51...well worth the pick...
He’s a tremendous athlete for his size, loads of talent, and major upside.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 28, 2009 3:33 AM CST up reply actions
I don't like Jarron Gilbert...
I mean he does have talent but not second round talent…. He seems like a guy that will ride on his combine performance get some good money but never reach his potential.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Mar 2, 2009 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
i guess you never saw his game tape....he was a second rounder long before the combine came calling..
and don’t be suprised if he goes near the end of round 1.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Mar 2, 2009 7:51 PM CST up reply actions
Nope didn't see it...
Hold up a bit I’ll go check..
by nicholas.rodriguez on Mar 3, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions
He could go early 3rd...I pray every night he does fall to #69...It would be the one of the biggest steals in the draft..
I still see him going mid 1st round to early 2nd. He did nothing to lose his 1st round projection at the combine…He actually probably raised it for teams that were on the fence. But lucky for us, several early 2nd round projections also faired very well and are now seen as going 1st round ( Z Hood, S Smith, A Smith, J Gilbert, B Robiskie, and C Barwin) to name a few.
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 11:03 AM CST reply actions
Talk to a guy at work and he heard the timer was off for the 40 on DB day. He said the guys clocking in the stands were getting faster times.
He said the coaches and scouts were getting better times than what was showing up. If thats true for the days the CBs ran I would be pissed. !st impressions go a long way and if it was wrong that number will stick with you.
Has anybody else heard anything like this. The guy who told me is a big sports fan but I have no clue were he got it.
Well...
when I was watching, they WERE having issues with the electronic timer for a while, but I think that was when Mark sanchez was trying to get his 40 done, not when the DB’s ran.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
That might of been it.
Well I guess all I can say is thank goodness we picked up 2 corners last year. These guys are slow.
+1 we picked up two of the fastest from last year..
by CowboysRnumba1 on Feb 26, 2009 8:02 PM CST up reply actions
Besides for DRC..
I think we did pick up the 2 fastest….Scandrick was 4.32 and Jenkins was 4.37 if I’m remembering correctly
by nicholas.rodriguez on Feb 27, 2009 1:49 AM CST up reply actions
I Remember
that either on dc.com or on the dmn blog they were talking that Scandrick was real fast but Jenkins might not be fast enough to play corner….4.37 isn’t fast enough to play Cb…I laughed for a while about that.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Mar 2, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions
The problem is , even the electronic times at started by hand...a delayed twitch from some clown who had a greasy hot dog before the event may cost players millions.
All teams clock players by hand, and even if they don’t, they get a consensus among the other scouts, and they all use that time…There is alot of info sharing when it comes to numbers at events and pro days…somebodies eye/hand coordination may be better than others, and vice versa…they showed them a few times, but if you noticed, there was small huddles of guys grouped near the 10 yd, the 20 yd, and the 40 yd….they all provide and share times with each other, and mark it down…the unoffical times are broken down in the video truck, they roll the tape, and either confirm or change the times accordingly using some timing equipment, and making sure time was begun at the precise moment the runner jumps out of his stance…..which is why there were some serious changes going on…
Didnt know all of that about the electronic timers and breaking down the tapes. Interesting.
I have seen all those guys huddle up around each others stop watches.

by 



















