Dan Reeves lands some office space at Valley Ranch
The Dallas Cowboys haven't announced anything yet but by all appearances Dan Reeves will be doing something with the team in 2009. If they give you an office in the building then it's a pretty good bet that you'll be sticking around. The Star-T reports Reeves has an office and gives us an interesting look into office politics by office location.
Those within the building say Reeves even has an office. He is supposedly occupying defensive line coach Todd Grantham's old digs. Grantham, meanwhile, has apparently moved into former defensive coordinator Brian Stewart's old office. Connect the dots if you want.
Todd Grantham in Stewart's old office? The same Grantham who has experience as a 3-4 coordinator in this league? Should we be able to read something into the location of Grantham's new office? If you've noticed, the Cowboys front-office has been noticeably tight-lipped since the season ended. Jerry's not talking much and we all know how rare that is. Wade Phillips has gone mute, we haven't heard much talk about the defensive coordinator position, and very little discussion on free agents, etc. I applaud their attempts to work outside of the media view, but it means we're reduced to divining intention from office locations! So who thinks this could be significant in terms of Grantham as the DC?
Make the jump for more discussion of Dan Reeves and his role with the Cowboys.
Back to Dan Reeves. The official website via Nick Eatman says the Cowboys will announce something on Reeves as early as this week. All the speculation is around what his duties will be as a consultant. Reeves has a lot of offensive background and head coaching experience, so you could see him maybe working with Jason Garrett on the offensive side of the ball. Maybe working with Tony Romo, too.
But one report cited by DC.com suggested his role would be more like Big Bother.
One of the changes Phillips said could occur this season involved his leniency with the players. One report that surfaced last week was that Reeves' primary role with the Cowboys would be to instill more discipline within the team, making the players more accountable for their actions, both on and off the field.
We could certainly use some of that. If his experience in the league as a player and coach can connect with the Cowboys current players, if they give him some respect based on what he's accomplished over the years, maybe he can help get these guys on track. Wade's friendly, aw-shucks style will be hard-pressed to make a radical change this year; is this the Cowboys attempt to play good cop-bad cop on the players? That strategy has its own risks. First, the players have to respect Reeves and they need to know what his authority is in the organization. Next, Jerry Jones has to be consistent, if he's going to give Reeves some power in dealing with players, he can't undercut him as he's known to do. Also, having kind of a split-structure for authority can have its own issues.
But overall, I would welcome this move. I've always thought of Reeves as a no-nonsense guy. But he's also a guy who has accomplished a lot in the NFL. If his role is as Big Brother, I like the idea but it really rests on the players respecting him and his authority. And Jerry Jones not screwing it up by sabotaging his efforts.
Bill Parcells weighs-in with advice for Jerry here.
Meanwhile, the DMN Blog has these quotes from Reeves earlier this month.
On distractions from players:
"They had an awful lot of distractions - things that you don't need to have with a football team, the T.O.s, the Pacman Jones instances," Reeves said. "You say, well, that doesn't really bother us. But it really does, because that's the focus. Everybody has to answer those questions, and it takes away from the time that you could spend doing something that's productive."
On character:
"People with great character, I think, do that. As much as you look for the physical things, they're easy to find. The key is trying to look inside and see what makes a young man tick. Is he a team player? Can you build chemistry around people?
"Yeah, they won't be a problem when you're winning, but as soon as things turn south, you've got a problem on your hands. You want people to be there through the thick and the thin and not be frontrunners."
Addendum -- Lots of good Dan Reeves info her, but I still want somebody in the Metroplex press to ask this question: who called Reeves? Who proposed hiring him and how was the final decision to hire him reached? With all the stories of this faction wanting T.O. in and that faction wanting T.O. out and Wade being in and Wade being demoted to make room for a big name, who decided to bring in Reeves?
Because if Dan is reprising his Texans' advisory role from '06, the grim reaper has just taken his office. Reeves joined Houston in December 2006 and two months later Dom Capers was gone. A few months later Charlie Casserley had also left the organization. Is Reeves there to arbitrate disagreements? Is he there to assess the talent and organizational structure? And if he his, who receives his reports?
Who hired him? Just ask the question. -- Rafael
134 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First business by Dan will be to cut TO....bank on it..
I listened to him long enough on Sirus Radio to know his feelings on TO. He will recommend to Jerry to cut him.
at this point...
i don’t even care about it anymore… i don’t mind t.o., but i wouldn’t mind losing t.o. either… i guess im just all blogged out about this subject hah
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't read too much into Grantham
taking Stewart’s office. I suspect one of the defensive coaches will be officially named DC at some point, but thats in name only, we all know Wade will run the defense as long as he’s here.
Regarding Reeves, I believe he and Wade will act as co-HCs with Wade dealing with the Xs and Os and Reeves dealing with discipline and accountability. They will probably have equal say in player personnel decisions.
In Romo we Trust
That's your best post
in my short time being here and it pi$$ed me off to even think that would be the case. But the worst part is it is feasible in this dysfunctional situation. Bring in Reeves to do what the Hillbilly Clowin is incapable of and act as a buffer for JJ.
Jerry can then tell the players that any and all concerns go through Reeves before they get to him and Reeves tells them to shut up and go play.
I wonder if JJ knew 2 years ago he was hiring half-a-HC. Do you think WP’s salary gets cut in half next year?
New word
Tri-co-head coaches
WP-Vice-principal of defense
JG-Vice-principal of offense
Reeves-the vice-principal that had the paddle hanging on his wall that didn’t speak much
Watched the Parcells link, thanks
Don’t care what anyone says, I wish he was still here in some capacity.
Not OK with Grantham. I hope Stewart’s old office has a window and Grantham’s old office does not. It appears on the surface as another AL Davis-esque hire because noone is interested in coming here and working for WP and/or Jones. I still believe this patchwork staff they are trying to put together next year means a much bigger change after 09-10 season. What is wrong with bringing Butler here?
The Parcell's link is funny...
Though he’s a little too diplomatic I think. He took a veiled shot with the “cohension” comment. I’d really like to know what he thinks when the cameras aren’t rolling.
by Boundforbeach on Feb 4, 2009 12:55 PM CST up reply actions
I wish he was still here as well, in th role that Reeves will probably be playing
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Miami is not Dallas...
You guys are getting sentimental because of the improvement Parcell’s team showed last year. That doesn’t mean he would have had the same success as a consultant here. Parcell’s, more than anything, is a turn around guy. Miami dramatically improved in year 1, just as when he took over the Boys with Quicy Carter. Let’s see what Miami does this year. My guess is that they don’t win 11 games. No how. No way. And Parcell’s would have never stayed with Jerry calling the shots on draft day. I have fond memories too, but I’m under no illusion that Parcell’s staying on to consult would have changed the course of this franchise. They didn’t win a playoff game when he was here, and they won 13 games last year without him.
by Boundforbeach on Feb 4, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions
exactly
people seem to forget that Tuna followed up his debut season here (10-6 with first rd playoff loss) with a 6-10 dud
miami wont be sneaking up on anybody next year and its optimistic to think that pennington is going to have 2 seasons like that in a row…..there’s a reason why the jets let pennington go last year and it wasn’t just favre’s availability….they were screaming for clemens to replace him in 2007
after seeing the offense haley runs out ther in zona...
kinda wouldn’t mind having him back either… we let go of a lot of good coaches between him and sparano and parcells and almost j g?
i’d much rather have haley back than parcells… i just feel like he couldn’t relate to the players…
haley is younger with the same fire, and looks to know what he’s doing… i would love to see what he would do with felix jones…
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
Not impressed with Grantham
Aside from Ratliff, have any of out D-linemen progressed? I would argue that several (Canty, Hatcher, Bowen) actually regressed recently. Compare that to Campo’s group (where the young kids played really well). I realize that much is the players’ fault but I don’t know how much a motivator Grantham is to have a group that played so lazily in 2008.
I would argue that Bowen, Canty, and Spears have had better year than last year
especially Bowen. So I don’t know what you are talking about.
Bowen plays mainly on passing downs and had no sacks
His solo tackles went down this year too. How do you call that progress? At least last year, he disrupted the pocket when he was in the game. Canty’s sacks and tackles are down. How do you call that progress?
by JimmyJohnson on Feb 4, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions
Well Bowen had more tackles this year than he had in his entire career
and just because he didnt get any sacks doesn’t mean he is not getting pressure on the QB. He looked good out there to me when we did play him. I would definitely say Bowen as well as Spears improved this year.
And maybe Canty didn’t really improve that much but I don’t think he regressed any. Any decrease in his stats was marginal.
I'm getting comfortable with the idea of Canty leaving
We got the same production from him his whole career; his upside seems to be his consistency.
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
canty leaving wouldn't worry me as much...
if we pick up that d end from san diego, the guy phillips drafted or at least coached…
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:11 PM CST up reply actions
nah no moar FA signings
unless they are cheap and numerous. Who’s to say the San Diego player is worth keeping anymore than Canty. We should go with out own young players and draft more young guys. At least young untested guys have a 1% chance of being a star, while we know what we’re getting with Canty or a FA
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions
im pretty sure he is cheap...def cheaper than canty...
and proven… and knows the defense, so not a big learning period or learning curve…
it wouldn’t hurt to also use a draft pick as well tho…
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
Last year was by far Spear's best year...........
You people looking for big stats from a 3-4 DE don’t know what your talking about.
True in most 3-4 schemes
But not the Phillips 3-4. DE’s don’t have 2 gap responsibility, where they hold their blocker, read and make a play. Our DE’s are responsible for shooting gaps. That’s why it was such a disappointment that the DE’s didn’t do more in the last 2 years. We lost the protection a 2-Gap scheme gives our ILB’s with no increased production from our DE’s.
Any player
who doesn’t respect Dan Reeves has no business wearing a Cowboys uniform.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
That 0-4 Super Bowl record speaks volumes...
His teams weren’t even close in the big games. I think 19 points was the closest they ever got.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
at least
he got to the Super Bowl. We haven’t been there in 12 years
thats true as well
keep in mind Bud Grant was one the greatest HC of all time and he is 0-4 in SBs.
In Romo we Trust
So which is better?
not ever going to the playoffs, 1 and done or get killed in the Super Bowl? I’ll take my chances at the Super Bowl. At least there’s progress
lets not jinx ourselves
into a great run during the playoffs and a humiliation in the super bowl… not sure how id feel about that… esp with the year-after records of super bowl losing teams
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions
true
just trying to put a positive spin on it instead of focusing on Reeves SB record. I think he’s a brilliant offensive mind. Tom Landry, in his book, called Reeves a genius. We never went to the Super Bowl after Reeves left with Landry as coach
true
His Broncos teams in the late 80s were on the wrong side of some the greatest ass whippings in Super history, specifically SB XXI, XXII and SB XXIV.
In Romo we Trust
but each of those teams the Broncos lost to were demonstrably better, and the Niners were an all time great.
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Bad comment
Reeves was the Cowboys’ offensive coordinator for the SB XII championship team, as well as the SB XIII team that rung up 31 points on the Steelers.
Dan has done
something that none of the current Cowboys players has done. He has played in two Super Bowls, one of which was a Cowboys win.
Why wouldn’t a player respect that?
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
Mum's the Word
I’m actually enjoying the tight lips at valley ranch. It’s refreshing for a change. No anonymous leaks, misdeeds, or players throwing each other and the coaches under the bus. Yes, it’s been a wonderful ten days sans controversy. Mabye Jerry is starting to get “it.” Guess we’ll just have to sit around and wonder if Jessica’s gonna dump Tony for cheating on her :)
Its because it's the off season
and nobody is at Valley Ranch. If this same silence continues over the next several months, then we can hope Reeves is having an impact.
In Romo we Trust
Maybe...
but no players have been arrested in a scrip club, there hasn’t been another youtube rapping adventure, and TO’s singing kumbaya with “he’s my boy” Romo. Maybe someone told them all to just shut the hell up, behave, and get ready for ’09. Or maybe not…
by Boundforbeach on Feb 4, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
if they're not dating a celebrity
it wouldn’t matter. The funny thing about the Cabo trip is if Romo wasn’t dating Simpson, nobody would have ever known about it.
In Romo we Trust
His teammates would know
And that’s the problem. There is nothing wrong with relaxing on a bye week when the coach gives you the time off. It doesn’t matter that the press made a big deal out of it.
But, like Troy said, a leader doesn’t set the right tone for his teammates by enjoying the spoils of NFL stardom just before a playoff game. Once you do something like that, nobody will ever accuse you of being a focused, workaholic. And if a team like ours doesn’t believe it has a focused, workaholic QB, there will be leadership issues.
that doesn't make sense
because Witten and Carpenter were with him on the trip and T.O. bought and paid for the trip.
In Romo we Trust
that doesn't make sense
because Witten and Carpenter were with him on the trip and T.O. bought and paid for the trip.
In Romo we Trust
I didn't say it was unpopular with his teammates
I said it set a poor tone for his credibility as a leader. Players probably thought Troy and Michael were egotistical assholes putting in all the unrequired extra time. But nobody was ever able to question their work ethic or doubt their leadership status. Teammates loved Deion. But he set a horrible example for the team.
It really
boils down to do you want to be a Leader of men or just one of the guys?
Disagree
First employer I ever had told me after I had been promoted that if you want to be respected you can’t just be considered “one of them”. Doesn’t mean you isolate yourself, but you have to set yourself apart where they respect you.
star players have to be stars
you can’t let your star point guard defer to other player’s decision making… imagine Chris Paul passing on a game winning shot
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
that might be true in the business arena
but not in sports, the players who are leaders also have to be one of the guys as well.
You can’t ell me guys like Manning and Brady aren’t one of the guys on their respective teams.
In Romo we Trust
I don't think they're one of
the guys. Besides look at them on the sidelines-Peyton talking with his receivers-Brady talking with their receivers. You have to command a presence. People aren’t going to just respect you because you’re the QB. There has to be a reason for them to follow.
you can command a presense
without isolating yourself from the rest of your teammates.
I don’t believe for one second that Brady or Manning aren’t of the guys on their teams, they most certainly are.
In Romo we Trust
check above
I never said isolate yourself. I said you have to give them a reason to follow.
well, you can certainly give them a reason to follow
and still be one of the guys, I’ve seen it many times on teams I’ve played for.
In Romo we Trust
uhh...
don’t we always see romo talking to witten, or romo talking to t.o… or romo talking to garret…
minus the games where he had no offensive line, he was talkative on the sideline with his receivers
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:19 PM CST up reply actions
not so much
this past year. The year before, yes. This past year, he always went and sat down on the bench by himself.
Manning and Brady
Appear to get along with their teammates. But, I think the great ones exude that they will get the job done with or without you. I don’t think Romo is at that point yet, but I think he has it in him. He makes mistakes, but he also makes plays and that’s a good start.
does anyone consider brett favre a leader?
i feel like he and romo not only play alike, but have the same attitude… small town guys with a big town talent who enjoy playing on sundays… minus the games they get pummeled…
and i’m pretty sure no one gets on favre’s back about being a leader…
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions
Partly because Favre didn't have to be
He had Reggie White as his leader. He also had Holmgren as a leader. He could just be a talented cog in the machine.
(I’d also point out that, while I like Romo alot, he doesn’t have anywhere near the natural talent of Favre or Aikman. He was the product of a great deal of hard work. His work-ethic seems to be somewhat questionable since he got paid).
also, remember in Favre's younger days
he was really fiery. He would get up in guys faces no matter how big or mean they were. In the early days, he would have blood streaming out of his mouth and they said that it actually fired him up and he played better-therefore making his teammates play better. I think of Favre as sitting on a John Deere with his Wranglers being perfectly happy while Romo likes the Hollywood party scene.
I have a question that should be raised
you have 5 seconds on the clock, and the ball is at the 20, down by 4… would you throw it to TO knowing he’s only 50-50 to catch it?
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions
i'd either throw a fade to roy williams
or a seam to witten… depending on the coverage
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
I'm just saying our star WR
is not the guy you want to go to when the game is on the line.
Is he going to catch the ball? whats going to happen?
He’s a fine guy to throw to in the 2nd quarter when there will be yet more passes
I remember how Seattle cut all their WRs who were notorious droppers, and went to the SB the next year
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions
I think what we're trying to say
is we don’t really trust T.O. to make the catch. Kinda sad, but true.
well i wouldn't go that far...
i would have faith in t.o. on our last drive… even our last play… but how many times do you think coverage would dictate us to throw to him… chances are, he’s doubled, or #1cornered up with saftey over the top…
but i understand what your saying… his lack of consistency is sometimes baffling considering some of the catches he does make…
by CowboysFan4Life on Feb 4, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions
and what compounds it even more
is Romo will try and force a pass in there even though he double covered-meaning someone else is open
I guess you forget the game-winning catch he had against Green Bay in the playoffs?
Of course I want T.O. thrown the ball in that stiuation.
He makes the big catches, it’s the 4 yard crossing patterns (wait who am I kidding we don’t run those to him) in the 3rd quarter that he loses concentration on.
He did make that catch
but he dropped, what, four passes before then?
money comment
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
And people overlook the fact that he brought his playbook with him on that trip
plus, observers there spotted him reviewing it…
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
Tony will
be fine. people just need to be patient. How many starts did manning have before he lost the “can’t win the big one” title?
bags030404
www.acowboynation.com
by Phillip Baggett on Feb 4, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
its only
been less than a week since players have not talked! Lets not take the tight lipped thing to far
bags030404
www.acowboynation.com
by Phillip Baggett on Feb 4, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions
I like the idea in principle...
but I wonder how it’s going to work in practical terms. What will Reeves’ title be? Czar of Discipline and Team Cohesion? Will he report to Wade or to Jerral? If he reports to Jerral, doesn’t that undercut Wade’s “authority” (such as it is)? Does Reeves have a role in game planning? Does that undercut Redball’s authority (again, such as it is)?
Lots of questions, no easy answers.
Off subject
but is anyone having problems with the website?
SBN was having some issues...
Should be all fine now.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Feb 4, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions
Amen
Three positive steps… the elimination of the beleaguered Brian Stewart, replacing the special teams coordinator, and now the addition of a highly-credible, detail-oriented Landry disciple. Tex is pleased enough with this news to head to the Club for a swim and a Calvados on this 75 degree February day.
PS: Tony Romo is the best NFL quarterback never to win a playoff game.
what about that rookie kid for Clevland in like 1979, who was MVP and Rookie Offensive Player of the Year
he tore his rotator cuff and didn’t win the play off game, never recovered after it
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
Man....
The Romo comment at the end. Had to throw it in there didn’t you?
Romo to you, is like when your with a woman(man) for a long time and you get into an argument. Everything you say is right and they have no ground to stand on and so they bring up what happened forever ago. I mean, of course it has no revelance to the conversation, but thats all they got so they run with it.
Don't forget the 'rub and the tug' big guy
and what the heck is Calvados?
french brandy? And he proudly calls himself "Tex"
by Boundforbeach on Feb 4, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions
This is definitely a step in the right direction...
Now we just have to wait and see in exactly what capacity will Reeves be acting as “consultant”…
The good news is that this proves Jerry has at least acknowledged that things needed to change. We saw glimpses with the Stewart and Read firings but this shows that JJ is at least trying to get serious and institute some change within the team.
I just can’t see Reeves coming in for a job in which he has little or no power. No, he is going to be changing some things and hopefully Jerry gives him free reign to do so.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
If it walks like a duck,
and it talks like a duck, and it sits in the DC’s office, it’s most likely a DuCk.
If you were a general planning to lead your troops into battle, you would get out the history books and study what the generals of old did in certain situations. You’d look at Ceasar’s tactics and Alexander the Great’s strategies. You would want to have as much insight and advice as possible. What would be even better would be to time-warp all of those great generals and sit around the table with them and discuss the upcoming fight.
If you’re Wade, you just time-warped one of those respected field generals into your office and you now have that ability to discuss, plan, kick ideas around and get new but experienced perspective. This is exactly what B Stew failed to do when he rejected Dom Capers. I think this is a good move for all.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
Agree, provided . . .
Reeves isn’t the Assistant Coach for player discipline. Can’t have too many chiefs. Lines of authority must be straight and few.
If Reeves is given any real authority, then would anyone want to handicap the probability of retention of our Reality-TV starring wide receiver?
I think he'll give him a fair shake ...
provided he has the talent and a level head. I do think he’ll sit him down in an one-on-one and define his narrow boundaries.
I like this move
it definitey seems unorthodox but this team needs to do a quick 180 from last season and at least play to its potential. Plus, I am sick and tired of quotes like this
Right now, I think it’s fair to say the Dallas Cowboys are the laughingstock of the NFL
I think Mosely is a D-bag but its hard to argue with him right now.
maybe I'm being optimistic
but these players have been thru 2 head coaches. They are the common denominator. I’m hoping that Reeves will give input on who needs to stay and/obeb go no matter how much “talent” they supposedly have because something has to give. You can’t tell me it’s all coaching.
I too hate quotes like that
but someone once believed in Matt McMillen and yet no one laughs at that joke.
How about Mike “Blaze of Glory” Holmgremm and his magestic ride in to the 2-14 sunset?
How about the rise of the Man-genius, and the fact that he and his predecessor at the Jets were both fired at the same time, 1500 miles apart?
And for my last joke, “It’s just another year, just another Cowboy going in to the Hall of Fame.”
by AustonianAggie on Feb 4, 2009 4:32 PM CST up reply actions
Haha
By the way did you see Drew Pearson’s comments in the Star Telegram. He sums everything up pretty well. Always liked that guy. It’s under the blog section
Or there lack of.....
What a shame. Hopefully Jerry is still learning what it means to be a Dallas Cowboy owner and tradition is a huge part of that.
thanks for posting that
why is it that everybody on the outside seems to get it except for Jerry? Maybe he needs to go back to Arkansas and put on his razorback hat. Just kidding if there’s any razorback fans reading.
I think Jerry
needs to learn how to be patient and build instead of using bandaids..
I think he thinks he is smarter then everyone else.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
That would be me
and putting a Razorback hat on will not make you smarter, trust me
Yeah
What the heck is that? I didn’t even see the official announcement and now I get a text from The Ticket saying he has already bailed? Great, more fodder for the masses to laugh at this team. This is going to go over so well…
"I'm not being condescending, I'm too busy thinking about far more important things you wouldn't understand." - Jimmy Carr
by Suicide Prince on Feb 4, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions
According to The Ticket text...
…“Ticket has learned that Dan Reeves has already quit Cowbosy and left VR complex.”
Can’t listen to the radio at the moment so not really sure what is going on. If someone else could provide an update, it would be greatly appreciated.
"I'm not being condescending, I'm too busy thinking about far more important things you wouldn't understand." - Jimmy Carr
by Suicide Prince on Feb 4, 2009 6:01 PM CST up reply actions
Cowboys
I can’t tpye.
"I'm not being condescending, I'm too busy thinking about far more important things you wouldn't understand." - Jimmy Carr
by Suicide Prince on Feb 4, 2009 6:01 PM CST up reply actions
Does anyone know what happened?
Maybe they’ll just blow the whole thing up and start over or maybe Reeves told Jerry the truth and he can’t take it.
Here's a link
http://www.beloblog.com/wfaasports/2009/02/report-dan-reev.html
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
Like
to know the source. Other than some guy on the radio, I mean.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
Well
It came from VOTS (Voice of Texas Stadium) — George Dunham. Not really sure how reliable but I don’t see someone that is employed by the Cowboys reporting that if they are still in the process of working out a contract.
"I'm not being condescending, I'm too busy thinking about far more important things you wouldn't understand." - Jimmy Carr
by Suicide Prince on Feb 4, 2009 6:27 PM CST up reply actions
But seriously......
if this is true it seems like a major opportunity missed. I thought a Reeves hire had a lot of potential….in many areas.
Yeah, so?
If the Cowboys ceased to exist tomorrow, ESPN’s ratings would probably drop 40%.
How do you miss what you never had?????
I don’t know but I kind of feel like that. I really thought this was going to be a good thing.
Raf.....guess it gets back to your final question.....
“who hired him?”….Perhaps no one did….maybe he was never really here.
LOL!
It was all a dream, Bobby. It was all a bad dream.
Sigh.
I must really love the Cowboys, because I just want to walk away and not care, but I can’t. I wish that I could say that this is the last straw for me, but I know it’s not.
by Baked Potato Soup on Feb 4, 2009 6:57 PM CST reply actions
Why so serious?
Who even knows what his position would be on the team, OR if he would have much effect to begin with?
Not really a big deal in my opinion. NOW if he had come on and things were looking great and then he got fired, that would be a back breaker.
Chalk it up to the weirdness magnet that is the Cowboys
To paraphrase the famous line from the movie Chinatown -
“Forget it Jake, it’s Valley Ranch.”
T-New, shutting down WR's for Dallas since 2003
Steve, Martha and Keanu..
.. were all reportedly seen at Valley Ranch. Martha was there with the Vandellas singing “No where to run to” to Jerry. Steve was there maybe to head up the body sculpting dept. and Keanu..well he just heard there was weirdness at VR and wanted to be part of it.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams

by 




















