Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

A Game of Inches Indeed

As painful as it may be for most Cowboy fans to relive the nightmare that was the 2008 season, one can't help but imagine what may have been, had it not been for a few squandered opportunities along the way. So as we sit here at the end of January with little going on a Valley Ranch, allow me to drag you all through the broken glass once again.

Football is a game of inches. That phrase is about as cliché as it gets, but the Dallas Cowboys' 2008 season proved to be the real-life embodiment of those words. Of course we all remember being ambushed by the St. Louis Rams. We all remember the pick-six in Pittsburgh. We all remember LeRon McClain tracing the vapor trail to the end zone that Willis McGahee had left behind only minutes earlier. But there were narrowly missed opportunities this season that did not appear on any highlight reel. Here are a few easily forgotten moments that could have changed the fate of the ‘08 Cowboys.

Star-divide

WEEK 4 - Failed Onside

Though Dallas had been thoroughly outplayed by Washington, the Cowboys still had a chance to steal one from their division rival late in the game. After trailing 26-17, Dallas slashed a late Washington lead to two , by way of an eight play, 87 yard drive capped by a Miles Austin eleven yard touchdown reception. With the score now 26-24 with 1:42 remaining in the game, the Cowboys needed to recover an onside kick to keep hope alive. Nick Folk booted a text-book popup, which Sam Hurd timed perfectly. Hurd met the ball at the apex of his leap, only to have it go directly through his hands and out of bounds. The Redskins squatted on the ball, and dealt the Cowboys their first loss of the young season.

WEEK 6 - 3rd and Friggin 17

After being stunned by an opening kickoff returned for a touchdown by the Cardinals J.J. Arrington, the Cowboys were able to find their composure and led 14-7 midway through the third quarter. With 7:27 to go, Dallas had forced Arizona into a third & 17 from their own 33 yard line. A stop here, and the Cowboys would have an opportunity to really begin to take control of the game.

On the ensuing play, Arizona set up a tailback screen to the left. Jason Hatcher was chipped then turned loose by the guard, and had a virtually uncontested path to the quarterback. With Hatcher bearing down on him, Kurt Warner was forced to get rid of the football before the blocking for the screen had materialized. The hurried throw was tipped into the air by a leaping Hatcher. Rather than be intercepted or fall harmlessly to the ground, the ball still found it's way into the arms of Tim Hightower, who made a move and skated around the left side to pick up the first. It was almost as if Hatcher's tip created just enough of a delay to set the hurried play back into it's proper synchronization. The Cardinals would score later in the drive on a two-yard completion from Warner to Larry Fitzgerald. Arizona would go on to force a costly overtime period, in which the Cowboys lost Mat McBriar, Tony Romo, and the game.

WEEK 14 - Romo's Lefty Heave

In week 14 Cowboys were nursing a 10-3 third quarter lead in what had to that point been a slugfest. With 4:54 to go in the period, the Cowboys were in business at the Pittsburgh 10 yard line after Tashard Choice skated 50 yards on a Tony Romo dump off. Sidenote: Choice has got to take that ball to the house. On first down, Romo was flushed out of the pocket and forced to improvise. Roy Williams had snuck away from William Gay along the back of the end zone and worked his way into the vision of his quarterback who was rolling left. Romo, with a little more time than he thought he had, channeled his inner Favre, and lobbed an errant left handed pass that sailed out the back of the end zone. If Romo is able to turn his shoulders and put a right handed throw anywhere near Williams it is an easy touchdown giving the Cowboys a commanding 17-3 lead late in the game. Instead, the Steeler defense smothered the drive and forced a 33-yard Nick Folk field goal, keeping the Steelers in striking distance. We all know how this story ended.

WEEK 16 - FUMBLE!

Trailing Baltimore 9-7 in the third quarter of final game in Texas Stadium, Dallas had allowed the Ravens deep into Cowboy territory. On first and 10 from the Cowboy 26, Joe Flacco handed off up the middle to LeRon McClain. DeMarcus Ware forced a fumble that laid on the Texas Stadium turf for what felt like 10 full seconds. Ken Hamlin had the first crack at it, but got stuck between diving on it and scooping it, ultimately doing neither. The Ravens recovered and the Dallas defense held again before being fooled by a fake field goal. Flacco capped the drive with a 13-yard completion to Derrick Mason, giving Baltimore a 16-7 lead, from which they would never look back.

Even after three and a half quarters of sloppy football, the Cowboys were still in it late. With 3:54 to go in the game, Dallas cut the lead to 19-17 on a Romo to Terrell Owens corner fade. Baltimore's Yamon Figurs fumbled the ensuing kickoff, and Dallas failed to recover again. The next play...ZOOM!! Willis McGahee sprints 77 yards to pay dirt. Another Dallas touchdown, and zoom again, this time 82 yards by McClain as the Baltimore Ravens turn out the lights at Texas Stadium.

What positive notion can we draw from this? While 9-7 is clearly a step back from 13-3, it does not necessarily mean that the 2007 Cowboys were clearly better than this year's squad. This years team played a much tougher schedule and learned about the pressure that comes with Super Bowl expectations. As good teams grow and become great teams, they do the little things necessary to steal a win here and there. They don't just get the bounces, they go take them. The Cowboys are a good team, but not yet great. This is a very young squad that is still searching for leaders and learning to win. If the 2009 Cowboys can find a way to make the little big plays, they will be well on their way to becoming great.

Comment 126 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great Column!

That 3rd and 17 against Arizona, was one of the most frustrating plays I’ve ever seen.

That was probably the biggest game of missed opportunities I’ve ever seen.

Dallas had the ball three times(I believe) on the other side of the 50 and never scored any points.

It was a rather disappointing game.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 11:24 AM CST reply actions  

Agree

I was there that day. When the play happened, i turned to my wife and said: “that’s a turning point.” Until that play, it seemed like we had finally gotten over the sluggishness of the first half. Very painful memory.

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Feb 8, 2009 9:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Also on that Steelers game....

That punt that Dallas touched was also a huge play. I think Pitt scored their FG on that possession.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 11:26 AM CST reply actions  

I was going to mention that one

as well as the 3rd and 17 against Pitt when Ben went down the right sideline to Santonio Holmes who double-moved Newman… That right there changed the game IMO

by commoncents on Feb 7, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree

Being at the game, the Steelers fans were realizing they were being outplayed and were going to lose. That play gave them life and re-energized the crowd and they quickly seized momentum after that play.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Feb 7, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

That was all on Newman

That is why coaches need to be accountable I guess.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 7, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Coaches couldn't change that

Newman has been beat like his whole career. Newman needs to be held accountable, he’s given too much credit for being a better CB than he really is.

by Doomsday on Feb 8, 2009 8:39 AM CST up reply actions  

I was referring to his

whining about coaches being accountable.

I tend to agree with you on Newman.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 8, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree, too

Interesting Dallas’ final three games were against the Steelers, Ravens, and Eagles, all three of them made the final four.

by cmmartin on Feb 8, 2009 8:32 AM CST up reply actions  

That one was a complete fluke

the result of a horrid punt. Dallas would have had the ball around the Pitt 40.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 7, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions  

They punted after that as well

but that Dallas touching fumble shifted field position to the Steelers. Romo got intercepted and then the Steelers only got a field goal

by Burt88 on Feb 8, 2009 1:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I hopped out of my seat...

when Hamlin literally tossed that fumble back into the arms of the Ravens… I hated him for a good couple of days after that.

by commoncents on Feb 7, 2009 11:29 AM CST reply actions  

Easily

his worst performance of the year…

by commoncents on Feb 7, 2009 11:33 AM CST reply actions  

It really sits bad with me

because it was the only game of the year that I took my two sons to. I don’t even want to talk how much money I wasted on it. BAD BAD MEMORIES.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

I could imagine the air being sucked right out of the stadium...

Although I will never ever forget the sound of the stadium in 2006, when we played the Colts. Terence Newman went to catch a short punt near the sideline and got HAMMERED by the Colts gunner.

I thought he died. Seriously. It was so quiet, I feel like I could have called down to Brit the Trainer and asked how 41 was feeling…

by commoncents on Feb 7, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Let's put it this way

normally you have to sit in traffic trying to get out of the stadium. Since about 80 percent left after the last big run-back it was very easy to get out of the stadium. I have never witnessed that much booing for the Cowboys as that night.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:59 AM CST up reply actions  

Great post

Valley Ranch isn’t burning, everyone can calm down. Rather than having to prove people right, the Cowboys will be out to prove people wrong next year. I’m looking forward to it.

by Tex34 on Feb 7, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Ouch

this post hurts.

Discovered by the Germans in 1904, they named it San Diego, which of course in German means a whale's vagina. .

by shadow1480 on Feb 7, 2009 12:34 PM CST reply actions  

Re-living these plays is very depressing.

We came so close to beating both Super Bowl teams on the road. How different things could have been.

"If your good at something never do it for free." - The Joker

by houseofprime on Feb 7, 2009 12:41 PM CST reply actions  

Good summary

Thanks for putting this together.

I have often thought about that Pitt throw by Tony. Could he have stopped and switched the ball to throw?

I remember how wide open Williams was. Opportunities like that against good defensive teams mean the difference between a W or L

by oldtimer on Feb 7, 2009 12:43 PM CST reply actions  

I also think that this season...

Showed how badly we need someone to be a capable backup on the O-line.

Cory Proctor is possibly one of the worst offensive linemen I’ve seen to start so many games.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 12:45 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah we couldn't keep Proctor off the field.

Kosier came back and got re-injured twice and in the second game Holland starts he gets hurt.

"If your good at something never do it for free." - The Joker

by houseofprime on Feb 7, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I endured watching each and every one of those "lowlights" you described above

And you’re right, Glory.

When you put it all in perspective, we did play a tougher schedule and still could’ve won all of those aforementioned games.

Btw, I like your style of writing. Very descriptive, yet concise… allowed me to “paint da pics” back in my mind of what happened.

Money post right here.

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Feb 7, 2009 1:20 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah I think 08' and 07' were similar...

Except that the bouncing ball in 07 always seemed to bounce Dallas’s way.

In 08 there were some major bad breaks, along with injury problems, ALONG with dysfunctional prima donnas.

AND the schedule was harder.

The error for margin in the NFL is so small.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 1:32 PM CST reply actions  

And just to back it up...

Ask Patriot fans about the Samuel INT that didn’t happen in the Super Bowl.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

So are you saying

that 2007 could have just as easily been a 10-6 or 9-7 season?

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Feb 8, 2009 9:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Game in the Desert

The thing that hurts the most about the Cardinals loss was if Folk had not missed the field goal, the game would not have gone to OT, Dallas would have won, and both McBriar and Romo would not have been hurt.

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Feb 7, 2009 1:39 PM CST reply actions  

unfortunately

I think Wade has lost his locker room.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think he said anything too bad

I think he is mistaken when he says he can play better in a 4-3. But, there is definitely a correlation between his decline and the institution of the 3-4. Correlation without causation, IMO.

He states the obvious that the team needs a firm hand and that TO talks too much.

by JimmyJohnson on Feb 7, 2009 2:07 PM CST up reply actions  

NO

He cannot play better in a 4-3, or that much.

God thats such a sorry excuse.

This isn’t an attack on you either, but the 4-3 to 3-4 switch isn’t THAT big of a difference for safeties.

You’ll take bad angles and throw shoulder tackles no matter what scheme you’re in.

So what, her can’t play nickel or dime anymore either, whats your excuse there Roy?

Sorry, it just seems that instead of saying “hey i’ll try and get better” all he does his make excuses.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm a little shocked to see a Cowboy calling out TO

every other player is at least publicly supportive. If I wanted cohesion, I’d lie to say TOs good. Roy is a whiner, he’s not as good in coverage as LBs we have on the roster.

And he disses on Wade. Roy is insubordinate and should be cut

by AustonianAggie on Feb 7, 2009 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Didn't Roy complain about

Parcells as well? I think he just wants out of Dallas IMO.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Football is often a game of breaks and missed opportunities

Despite of the inner chaos of the season, with a few breaks, we could have been easily 12-4 and divisional winners. It just wasn’t our year, but someday it will be again.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Feb 7, 2009 2:32 PM CST reply actions  

I think a team can create the breaks

Pittsburgh does repeatedly. The ball always seems to bounce their way. Do you think its just luck?

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Feb 8, 2009 9:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Some things are luck, some are poise

Think of Hamlin vomiting up a fumble against the Ravens. It is largely luck to get a gift wrapped fumble, and then it is a lack of execution to handle it like a freaking grenade. Luck should balance out, but taking advantage of it is sometimes a reflection of skill/poise etc, and failing to take advantage is a lack thereof.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 8, 2009 10:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Column Is Delusional

This column speaks as if a break here or a break over there could have meant the 2008 Cowboys could have contended for a championship. Nothing could be further from the truth. This team lost early and it lost in the middle; when it beat teams in games that purportedly counted as big games, it turns out the wins were against weak opponents; the Tampa Bay win was against a weak team; we beat the Giants without their running game in gear. When it really mattered, this team found a dozen different ways to win. The final game is a better guage of the quality of this franchise and this team. This team is fatally flawed; it is gutless and cowardly; it needs an overhaul from top to bottom and a whole new approach to playing football.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 7, 2009 2:44 PM CST reply actions  

Timeout!!!!!

1) The column never said it could have cotended for a championship. Never…ever. In fact, it looks as if you didn’t even read the colum at all but instead just picked up parts of it. It actually wrote that it was a good team but not a great team.

2) The Tampa Bay win was good. Dallas was playing without Tony Romo and Terrence Newman and the crowd was never into it until about halftime. Considering injuries that was a damned good win.

3) So what if Dallas beat the Giants without Brandon Jacobs. It was still a division win against the defending Super Bowl champ.

And furthermore, the team isn’t going to get an overhaul from top to bottom, or needs it. It needs a better coaching staff and perhaps some subtractions here and there, but not a complete overhaul. 13-3 and 9-7 teams don’t get overhauls.

Maybe I shouldn’t take this as bad as I do, but it irritates me that you seems that you looked at the title, read a few words and then started typing something to discredit the column immediatly.

GD88 is right. A few of those bounces take place and Dallas is at least in the playoffs, but you shouldn’t rely on those things….. but he already said that and if you had read it all you would have noticed.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 6:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe the Article Is On Point

But, certainly the focus of the article is that a few bounces here or there would have changed things dramatically. I just don’t agree with this assertion. This team is dysfuctional; it has holes galore like depth at offensive line; no back up quarterbacks; it is soft up the middle; it has no safeties; its special teams are at the bottom of the league. Dallas lost consistently across the board, which tells me that games like the Steelers game went perfectlyl according to plan. The Cowboys are not a very good football team; to argue otherwise is delusional.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 7, 2009 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Whatever man...

They are a not a bad football team neither, and that isn’t delusional.

They didn’t go 3-13, they had a winning record with their QB out for three games.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Baloney

Dallas missed the playoffs for crying out loud. You think we are better than reality say is true. Homerism is ugly and counterproductive. Reality is to take a serious look at why this franchise is now almost a decade and a half removed from a playoff win. Wake up.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

dude...

we could have drove down the field on the steelers and scored, just like last year when witten caught the last minute touchdown against the lions. we could have got an onside kick and won with a fg against washington like we did last year against the bills. our giants loss was without our starting qb, and think if the giants played US at home without THIER STARTING QB. If we stop those two long runs against the ravens, it’s a one possession game and we have a chance to take the lead considering we already had 2 touchdowns in that same quarter. If we have Romo against the Rams, we win.

We do have problems (jerry jones) but he’s can’t be taking ALL the blame… the players must be held accountable too. I’m disagreeing with you to the full extent that we are not a good football team

by commoncents on Feb 8, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions  

We'ere good but not great

definitely can’t deny that. When the Steelers tied the game up with 2:04 left, I knew Romo was going to throw an interception and we would lose the game because of it. There is a big difference between going against the worst team in the league and against the best defense in the league especially with the wind against you. We were guaranteed to lose that game when they tied it up. That Redskins game, who knows what happens if we recover

by Burt88 on Feb 8, 2009 10:35 AM CST up reply actions  

we were up by 10!

and should have got the ball back if it weren’t for newman getting beat on 3rd and 17… we had them cornered and blew it… like i said… 9-7 and 12-4 are inches away from each other every sunday

by commoncents on Feb 8, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Going back to what I was saying

we are not a great football team. The inability to close games is why we lost 3 of our last 4 games (save for Philly). The offense stinks it up in Pittsburgh with 5 turnovers (1 was special teams, shifting field position over to the Steelers), the defense in the Ravens game just gave up when the offense finally figured the Raven defense out. Yes, we should’ve been 12-4 but we didn’t finish games. The Cowboys are known to suck in the 4th quarter, that’s why we are not a great football team

by Burt88 on Feb 8, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you that they need to finish games/the season out better

But a few lucky bounces our way puts us in the playoffs.. end of story.

by commoncents on Feb 8, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

"The Cowboys are not a very good football team; to argue otherwise is delusional"

is the comment that made me reply. I never said we are a great team, but we def. have a good football team. We are inconsistently great and consistently underachieving. If mistakes, turnovers, and penalties can be cut down, we can play with any team in the league.

by commoncents on Feb 8, 2009 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely

but I have to see it before I can believe it. If we don’t make stupid mistakes, we are easily one of the best teams in the league. Just imagine how good we would be if that happened

by Burt88 on Feb 8, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions  

That's a totally fair assessment.

It seemed like this year was filled with them too.

by AirforceBat on Feb 8, 2009 4:05 PM CST up reply actions  

give me a break here

What playoff team are you positive had depth on the line? Philly did. I don’t think the giants, panthers or cards suffered any oline injuries at all this year. Sorry, but without their starting qb, every team that made the NFC playoffs this year (aside from minnesota) wouldn’t finish with 8 wins. Most would go 1-2 against our schedule w/o romo just like we did. These “holes” you speak of – EVERY TEAM HAS THEM. Plax shot himself in the leg, jacobs got hurt as he always does, and the giants lost like 4 of their last 5 games. Some years your guys stay healthy and sometimes they don’t, thats the bottom line.

The Eagles finished 9-6-1 and the cards finished 9-7. They have tons of holes to fill this upcoming offseason and will lose plenty of veteran leadership. What constitutes a good football team in your mind? 5 of our 7 losses came against the conference finalists+giants…That means we were 9-2 against the rest of the nfl. That is GOOD, not great. which sums up our year last year.

You could make a good argument that the only difference between 9 wins and 11 was not having a healthy barber for most of the year, who is the best in the league in that closer role and you have to think would’ve helped our offense tremendously if he were healthy in december.

by foyesboys on Feb 8, 2009 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

the way i choose to look at it is

that the kind of games that we lost in 2008 were the kind of games that we won in 2007…like the Detroit game for example….in 2007 – we would pull those games out but in 2008 we lost them

personnel wise – i think this was a better team than the 2007 version

what happened was – law of averages caught up, Romo got hurt and then the losing brought on the internal sniping

by McLovin9 on Feb 7, 2009 6:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep...

I brought up the same thing… the bounces we got, weren’t coming this year.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Good Teams Overcome Bad Bounces

And dysfunctional and bad football teams crawl into a fetal position and do what Dallas did in the Philly final or the Ravens breakdown or the Steelers loss or the Ram smackdown; LOL if you think beating the terrible Tampa Bay team meant a hill of beans. I am amazed at how totally delusional Cowboy fans can be after neearly a decade and a half of losing. Face it folks, Cowboys are average at best and their management under Jerry is not getting any better. This team is doomed until Jerry dies.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 7, 2009 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok....

Here’s the deal…

Given the circumstances that win over Tampa Bay was huge.

Announcers said it, media said it, fans said it.

It was big, you can laugh out loud all you want.

If Dallas loses that game they go into the bye week with a losing record. Straight up.

Holding a team to no TD’s is big anytime. They weren’t horrible then either. And Brad Johnson is so bad that it was amazing that Dallas could beat anyone.

Wait until Jerry dies to comment back on Dallas, because you sound like a complete knucklehead.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

Just because you arent overly pessimistic doesnt mean oyu are naive or delusional

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Feb 7, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Tampa Bay Was Bad

So were the Giants without Brandon Jacobs and a key member of their defense. Dallas had a horrible 2008; just a terrible team effort. Standing mostly with a pat hand going into next year is delusional. This team needs a makeover; it needs rid of bad character guys and loud mouths that talk more than they perform — and it needs a 1975 infusion of young talent.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

the giants without jacobs

are hardly better than the giants with jacobs. Look at the playoff game in philly – the philly dline, like ours, beat up the giants oline. Jacobs didn’t change anything.

And wait…so you’re making excuses for the giants without jacobs? and then proceeding to cry about how we have no depth

yet we played 3/4 of the year without a mobile barber, 3 games without romo and at least 2 more with a bad rib injury, newman was playing hurt constantly, witten wasn’t remotely healthy the last 5 weeks agaisnt our toughest competition, Flozell played with one arm for 3 weeks in the first half of the season?

by foyesboys on Feb 8, 2009 9:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Jacobs was running over that Philly defense

for most of the game. They didn’t run it enough early. Every time he ran he broke 10 yard runs a lot. No Plaxico is why the Giants sucked. Their receivers couldn’t catch anything, that’s not Jacobs fault they ended up losing. Just imagine how bad Giants would’ve lost without Jacobs.

Now tell me, when is Barber ever mobile? He wasn’t really hurt until Thanksgiving to the awful end at Philly. Everyone gets hurt in football. And besides Newman is the most overrated cb in the league, no question about it. Witten was banged up, very true, Flozell, injury or not, had an awful season. Romo even when hurt, still wants to take unnecessary gambles.

by Burt88 on Feb 9, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think you got the memo

that conclusion is not allowed in here. Its hurts morale (which in turn hurts ticket and merchandise sales).

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Feb 8, 2009 9:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for proving my point

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Feb 8, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Lot of Others

Stealers game (it’s not mispelled, they stole a Superbowl from us and several games) and Tony waits and waits staring down Austin as he cuts up then crosses right to left before dumping it off to him. Look in the far background of the screen and you see TO 12 to 15 yards separated from his man while the play is going on.

What about “what if’s” cause when Tony was down and the O-line was playing like 3rd grade girls we sure could have taken a cue from the many other NFL teams that were using variant formations and personel to win games or at least shake things up.
Take for example the fact that Everyone’s pass rush was highly effective and instead of just giving them the sack why not bubble screen or back pass to one of our previous college quarterbacks and let them either do their thing or throw it. Didn’t we bring Stanback here because of his wheels and Crayton because of his hands??? Well think outside the bubble because we Threw Away 4 games and in the NFL that means No Playoff For YOU!

by LiveNDieBlue on Feb 7, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply actions  

I really like your work

This is another great and thought provoking story, not to mention very well written. Keep up the great work!

by StillHateTheGiants on Feb 7, 2009 6:13 PM CST reply actions  

+1

I thought it was a great piece as well.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 6:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

it is a game of inches….but I never felt this team was on the same page after the loss to the Redskins. Even before he was hurt, Romo did not look like a guy that was enjoying his job anymore. In fact, I really don’t think this team has been on the same page since late last season. I know we had some good games and so forth but I just have a bad feeling about whether or not Phillips is the right guy for all these egos. I hope I am wrong since apparently we are stuck with him for another season.

by cowboyz4ever on Feb 7, 2009 6:23 PM CST reply actions  

Best post I've seen....

As regards to being realistic about things. I didn’t ever think that Romo looked like he was comfortable either, and I DON’T think that Wade is the right guy for the job either… but like you I know that thats a change that isn’t happening this year. Might as well talk about things that might change this year.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 6:33 PM CST up reply actions  

I am wondering

if anyone else besides me has had the thought that maybe Wade Wilson is not the right guy to communicate with Tony. David Lee must have done a pretty good job, maybe the team needs to think a little more about Romo’s progression as a quarterback. I know it’s Garrett’s offense, but doesn’t the qb coach have a lot to do with the qb’s development? Bottom line is no matter how many years he has been in Dallas, Romo is still fairly new at this and comes from a background that probably did not have top notch coaching like the bigtime programs. He still needs teaching….maybe Wilson is not the right teacher.

by cowboyz4ever on Feb 7, 2009 6:43 PM CST reply actions  

Possibly....

I’m sure that is a position that will be looked at.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 6:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you

remember a couple of years ago, they were working with Romo on not forcing the ball downfield and going thru his reads. He seemed like he regressed back his old habits. He sometimes rushed his throws instead of waiting for the play to develop. He also had a problem earlier with side-arming his passes which they were working on. This past year I did see some of the side-arms coming back.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 6:50 PM CST up reply actions  

A game of inches...

that’s what she said!

Sorry, I couldn’t contain myself.

If you are beating a dead horse, you might be a Cowboys fan.
I was StarStruck at TBB/BSR, now...

by icStars on Feb 7, 2009 8:01 PM CST reply actions  

Seriously though...

Maybe Romo should study Big Ben this off-season instead of Brady, because Ben looked to have taken a page from Romo’s playbook after taking a beating early in the season when his protection was failing him.

Coached to or not, I think Romo’s study of Brady worked out nicely while he enjoyed good protection, but when that fell apart, he looked uncomfortably torn between two styles of play, more often with less than desirable results. Mimicking Brady may ultimately serve him well but he needs to meld the two styles as situations dictate—but not at the expense of good mechanics. I thought what looked different about Romo in ’08 was that he wasn’t playing his game.

If you are beating a dead horse, you might be a Cowboys fan.
I was StarStruck at TBB/BSR, now...

by icStars on Feb 7, 2009 8:04 PM CST reply actions  

I don't think Romo

needs to have Brady’s mechanics, I’d rather he pay attention to Brady’s decision-making.

by illcowboy on Feb 7, 2009 8:24 PM CST up reply actions  

True.

You can try to make plays without being reckless all the time.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Good mechanics, Brady's or not

But, yeah, better decison making is part & parcel of the job.

If you are beating a dead horse, you might be a Cowboys fan.
I was StarStruck at TBB/BSR, now...

by icStars on Feb 7, 2009 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Good post

And its true thatin many games one play not going our was resulted in a loss. That missed onside in the Redskins game was a sign i guess, that everything wouldnt go right in the regular season. (Unlike the year before where we won any game we wanted to except agaainst the Pats) But one thing that still bugs me is Wade’s decision to kick deep at the end of the Baltimore game. Our offense had just driven the length of the feild to score and we have IMO the best onside kicker in the league and we dont even try it. Of course you all know how that ended.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Feb 7, 2009 8:45 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah but...

Things like onside kicks are just way too unpredictable.

The only thing that made the one against Washington so bad, was that it went right through Hurd’s hands.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

But all of Folk's kicks seem to work perfectly

He always gives our team a chance to make a play on the ball. Its one of his real strengths and I think the decision to kick it deep was a classic example of a coach trying not to lose rather than trying to win.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Feb 7, 2009 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Because the Ravens were not able to throw the ball

on us, we knew they were going to run with it and so Wade thought we cold hold them to a 3 and out and then we get the ball back in pretty good field postion because we were able to move the ball on them at that time. Unfortunately, our defense choked and we know what happened. I actually, think Wade’s strategy was the right one, our guys just didn’t excecute it well. Plus we didn’t want to give them good field position if they were able to recover the onside kick.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

ok but I disagreed with the call at the time and I still disagree with it.

"Ask Philly was it hard tryin' a stop TO, he da main reason that the fans would come fo'."

by aussie_cowboy on Feb 7, 2009 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I can actually see it both ways.

I was at the game and I was expecting an on-side kick but they kicked deep. It surprised me but I can see it both ways. That was such an utterly disgusting ending plus it was cold and windy that night which made it even worse. I have never heard as much booing at a home game as that night. Oh well!!!

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah...

I could have seen it going both ways, but you should trust your defense to get the ball back at some point.

Two 70 yard TD runs generally just don’t happen… to anyone.

Sigh.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I shouldn't read....

This as much as I have here lately.

I realize now that there are a low percentage of people on here that are assclowns.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 10:57 PM CST reply actions  

and here you are

calling someone a knucklehead and now saying there are too many assclowns. Great stuff.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 7, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

And those are both in reference to people...

Who call an entire fanbase delusional and insult someone’s column.

It wasn’t even an opinion based column, it was entirely factual.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 11:19 PM CST up reply actions  

on a positive note

it could be worse, we could be Lion’s fans. Then we really would be delusional and insulting. Just kidding.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep...

Thats what I always think to myself, “could be a lions fan”.

Haha.

I didn’t mean to sound like a jerk either, but there are honestly people that get on here and I wonder if they are actually want Dallas to succeed.

by AirforceBat on Feb 7, 2009 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I know sometimes I complain too much

but it’s because you want to win so much that you get caught up in that. What’s really weird is I can complain about Romo and T.O. but if someone else that’s not really a fan says it, I get mad. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense but that’s me.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Complaining...

Isn’t that bad.

Everyone has an emotional investment in this team, it’s natural.

But when people call other people out for having some enthusiasm about anything.. there is no reason for that.

by AirforceBat on Feb 8, 2009 12:02 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree

because I was called out and insulted by someone last week and it really ticked me off. There is nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion but you should never attack someone and insult someone’s intelligence (like I was) it’s uncalled for.

by texstar on Feb 8, 2009 12:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Game of Inches Implies Cowboys Were Close

And, nothing could be further from the truth. They missed the playoffs because they played terrible football; from the first Redskin loss at home, to the smackdown by Steven Jackson of the lowly Rams to the give up against the Ravens to the Steelers loss to the absolute worst game in Cowboy history the season final at Philly; this team deserves to be gutted and remade in the image of a tough and no nonsense young Tomlin type head coach; you have to teach a team to win and this group is Loser in its core DNA. Period end of story and no amount of homerism can change the smell of this group. They are losers. Undeniable.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions  

No....

If you read the article that isn’t what it implies.

It’s just saying that there are a few plays that are the difference in a playoff win or not.

by AirforceBat on Feb 8, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

Steelers had the ability to close games, Cowboys don’t. If anything we falter in the 4th quarter, usually

by Burt88 on Feb 8, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

This is a young team?

The draft class that has powered the Cowboys’ success over the past few years is not reaching free agency. This may have seemed like a young team because rookies were forced to start last year due to injuries, but most players are currently in the prime of their career. The prime started this past year and has 2-3 more solid years left in it.

Hopefully, we become like the Colts, Chargers, and Pats at replacing talent through the draft. To be more a bit more myopic, hopefully the Cowboys get their locker room in order, get and stay healthy, and take advantage of their easier schedule next year.

by GhettoBear04 on Feb 7, 2009 11:35 PM CST reply actions  

Our talent is very thin right now

Nobody is pushing any of the starters, there is little competition. Henry may be the only guy sweating his starting spot.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 7, 2009 11:39 PM CST up reply actions  

you hit the nail on the head

that’s what hurt us so bad last year was the sharp drop-off in starters/back-ups. Our talent depth is what really did us in. Everyone has injuries, it’s how you deal with those.

by texstar on Feb 7, 2009 11:55 PM CST up reply actions  

And runningback...

But kind of a different situation there. You’re right though, the depth is thin, certainly on the o-line.

But in all honesty there isn’t a NFL team out there that has great depth at every position.

It just so happens that the fall off from #1 QB to #2 QB was horrid.

Johnson was thought to be able to manage a game, and he was missing the most elementary of throws.

by AirforceBat on Feb 8, 2009 12:06 AM CST up reply actions  

agreed

OLine and safety in particular were affected. I thought we did fairly well with CB’s being plugged in. We definitely need to upgrade the backup QB. Why anyone did not address that last year is beyond me. I think Jerry gambled thinking Romo wouldn’t get hurt and he lost.

by texstar on Feb 8, 2009 12:17 AM CST up reply actions  

We have depth at RB

maybe CB and TE. Our depth is terrible on the OL, DL, LB, S.

When is the last time there was a big battle for a key starting role heading into TC?

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Feb 8, 2009 12:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Ha! Good one!

I was thinking Dutton/Smerek 1983?

by JimmyJohnson on Feb 8, 2009 8:45 AM CST up reply actions  

How about strong safety?

Besides the o-line, we have no strong safety worth the name. We are soft up the middle due to a zero at prototypical 3 – 4 nose tackle. We had nothing at back up QB; how could anyone justify going into 2008 with Brad after what he showed in 2007 in limited effort? This proves how stupid Jerry is at GM; it is pure fantasy to think you can win without a great backup. The o-line has been just horrible and we have a dozen failed draft picks to thank for that. A decade and a half without a playoff win; and we missed the playoffs with several give up losses at the end of the season. Gutless cowards; their DNA is losers. To quote Obama, we need change.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

You Are What You Are

You are what your records says you are and the Cowboys as a franchise have lost the institutional knowledge that produces a winner; this franchise is stuck on stupid.

by Iowacowboy on Feb 8, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Inch by Inch

Congratulations Bob Hayes
"I played for the world's greatest professional sports team in history. Once a Dallas Cowboy, always a Dallas Cowboy." - Bob Hayes
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com

by Raul Villaronga on Feb 8, 2009 8:40 AM CST reply actions  

The Actual Game of Inches

Shocked this went on for 106 comments without a mention – BASEBALL is a game of inches. Everyone of those examples is a missed opportunity, not a case where it was off by an inch. Foul vs. fair, strike vs. ball, out vs. safe, those are the inches we’re talking about, and the only really comparable thing in football – the first down marker is entirely subjective as a result of where the official spots the ball.

by deadrody69 on Feb 8, 2009 12:34 PM CST reply actions  

I think he phrased "Game of Inches"

in reference to the missed opportunities in our losses.

by commoncents on Feb 8, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Indeed...

It’s a metephor.

Not really that hard to figure out that it wasn’t literal.

by AirforceBat on Feb 8, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes

Recent FanPosts

97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Small
How The Giants GM Would Fix The Cowboys Overnight ... Good Read Jerrah!!!!
Zzzzwww_small
Twitter GM Mock
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui