T-new offers rebuttal to his earlier interview
Back on Mar 9th Grizz posted an interview that T-new gave to a local TV reporter. It started quite a stir as to whether or not he should have done so. The post did not divulge the time of the interview but it at the time most had determined that it was done before TO was cut, but not how far back. I noticed that neither the reporter or T-new talked about canty, henry leaving the team, both happened before TO was cut and Henry was pretty much within the first few days of FA. The link below provides a more specific time and a rebuttal or clarification of what he was talking about in the 1st interview. Part of me wonders why an interview with T-new came out so late in the news cycle (DMN is now just talking about it, along with PTF).
The gag order came back out in late february and according to the last post he did the interview about two weeks ago but that does not add up. The trade for Kitna was done back on the 27th of Feb and Brooking was signed the next day on the 28th. Neither one of them talked about the siging of Kitna or the trading of A. Henry? I could understand it if T-new had not heard about it but for the reporter to not even ask him about that is what does not add up. So the Mar 2 date the new link is claiming is also off; add in that on Mar 1st Canty accepts a deal with the giants.
Here is the link on his rebuttal:
http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/03/terence-newman-on-terence-newman.html
I just wondered if anyone else wonders why this came out so late? The interview had some pretty spicy stuff to be put on the back burner. But more than likely it was held back because of the TO news and that overshadowed everything else. I guess the main point I am trying to make is that this is the silly season for a reason and any news we get should be taken with a grain of salt because we are not getting the full details.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think it came out so late
because 1) Tim McMahon was on vacation, and 2) The DMN blog needed something to stir people up again. So why not some old crapola?? I don’t think what Newman did was right but I’m not going to sweat it. Hopefully, his teammates won’t either.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Funny part is
This had its own headline on sportscenter.
I'm glad Newman set the record straight
Reached Monday, Newman said he doesn’t believe the relationship affects Romo, “but the public perception is that it does affect him.”
“The thing they don’t see is he might go [out of town] but at the same time he comes back and works out,” Newman said. “He’s been in there the past couple of weeks with the rest of us. Roy Williams and me and a bunch of guys are in there busting our butts, and he’s right there with us. They don’t see him working out. They don’t see what he puts into the preparation.”
In Romo we Trust
Sounds Like Valley Ranch
Is conducting media damage control. Newman was likely coached on what to say to rehabilitate a tarnished image. His first comments were his most honest; now the organization has to paper it over.
Him and Tony are friendly.
I think he was probably reminded by a few guys that you don’t talk about another teammates woman.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Another conspiracy theorist
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Mar 19, 2009 6:51 AM CDT up reply actions
Oh please
Can we let this story die. Really not a big deal. Newman suffered through some crap QB’s before Romo took the reigns. I’m just going to guess that he loves having as good a QB as Romo. He wants him to succeed as badly as anyone.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Mar 19, 2009 6:50 AM CDT up reply actions





















