Wedge Busted: New Rule Change Could Shape Dallas' Late-Draft Plans
Felix Jones' kickoff return skills were one of the most immediate payoffs from last year's stellar draft. Jones returned a kickoff 98 yards for a score against Philadelphia and just missed going the route on a couple more before hamstring and toe injuries shortened his season.
A new rules change threatens to diminish Jones' return explosiveness. The NFL this week banned the traditional four and five man wedges that are common on all levels of play. When executed properly, they work like this:
Two years ago, I watched former special teams coach Bruce DeHaven work with the Cowboys’ returners and watched him teach his guys to use cutbacks. Returners were instructed to initially run directly up the field, even if it was not behind the wedge. The intent is to pull coverage guys towards you and give your wedge blockers an angle. After running a few yards upfield, the game is to then cut behind your blockers.
Jones followed this technique perfectly. Dallas had a center return called. Jones fielded Akers kick on his two, about three yards inside the yard numbers on the far sideline.
The Cowboys wedge formed at the fifteen, just outside the far hash mark. The Cowboys use Tony Curtis, Joe Berger, Pat McQuistan and Deon Anderson as their center four. They join hands and then move forward together under control until they encounter the line of Eagles. The returner who doesn’t field the kick, Isaiah Stanback in this case, runs up and flanks Anderson, adding a fifth blocker to the wedge.
Jones was about five to seven yards wide and to the left of Curtis, the closest wedge member, when he fielded the ball. Instead of angling to his right and running immediately to get behind his five bodyguards, Jones ran straight upfield, to about the ten...
-- Felix Jones -- He's Crafty -- Like a Cat, BSR, 9-16-2008
The new rule allows nothing larger than two-man wedges. The NFL cited safety as its rationale -- the wedges are collision magnets, which invited wedge-busters on other teams to throw their bodies into the line and "blow it up."
The National Football Post's Matt Bowen, a wedge-buster in his day, argues the rule change will wipe out the big return and make kickoffs far less interesting. I'm not sure I agree with Bowen, but I do agree that big kickoff returns will diminish if teams continue to use the same four people they've assigned to wedge duty in the past.
Dallas, as the quote demonstrates, used some combination of backup offensive linemen and fullbacks and blocking tight ends to form their four-man wedges. Berger and McQuistan formed the core of this group. Other teams have used defensive linemen; anybody who can produce the biggest bang against the wedge busters, who are usually linebackers, safeties and cornerbacks.
Two man wedges will place a premium on guys who can block in space, who can mirror a lighter, faster target and engage him one-on-one, or two-on-one in open field. The old wedges didn't require this of the linemen since coverage guys had to engage them. If you tried running around a wedge, the return man could simply hide behind it and follow the big grunts far upfield.
My guess is we may see fewer, if any offensive linemen on kickoff returns this year. Fullbacks, blocking tight ends and big backs will take their places. These guys are used to blocking blitzing linebackers, safeties and corners alone.
This will mean some of those many 4th, 5th and 6th round draft picks Dallas owns could be earmarked for smaller special-teams guys. Curtis was not tendered last month and has moved on. I had written before that Dallas will likely draft a fullback to replace him, since it needs a dependable hammer who can lead the three-headed Marion-Felix-Tashard monster on inside running plays.
I feel even more strongly the team will draft one now. The new wedge rules makes me think Dallas may now draft a fullback and a big blocking tight end.
The rule could also shape Dallas' and other team's thoughts about the backup linemen they activate. Dallas often activated seven offensive linemen on game day, the five starters and two backups who could cover the five line positions. If the Cowboys played next week and the old rules were in place, the backups would likely be Cory Proctor, who can play guard and center -- and who played wedge in '07 when he was a backup -- and Pat McQuistan, who has played wedge the past two seasons.
Under the new rules, Proctor would likely retain one spot, ahead of Montrae Holland, because he can play center. McQuistan had an edge at tackle because he doubled on the wedge. If that role disappears, the door is open for Doug Free, or some hotshot rookie draftee to make a push.
Back to Felix Jones. I think he and other talented returners will survive just fine. Kickoffs will now be treated as gigantic screen plays. Think of how often a good runner thrives in space on a screen pass, even when his linemen are whiffing one-on-one in space.
Cats can adapt, and Felix Jones is one crafty cat.
0 recs |
30 comments
|
Comments
Why not
Have 2 wedges of 2 guys, one in front of the other, cuz if one gets stopped Felix can quickly get out of there and there will still be another one in front
by nicholas.rodriguez on Mar 27, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You start stacking blockers and you create lots of gaps where those guys would have been,
where return guys get uninterrupted paths to the ball carriers. I think you’re doing the returners a favor in this scenario.
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
well said Raf
Felix the Cat is as crafty as they come. I look for a huge year from #28 in 2009.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Mar 27, 2009 1:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Less Bug Returns...conventionally?
Very interesting column. I wonder if this will lead to more trickeration on returns? More reverses, or toss-backs, etc. Since 3 and 4 man wedges won’t be allowed, maybe some special teams coaches will come up with more innovations on returns? Are there any major high school leagues that have adopted this rule, and if so, has there been any innovation at that level?
by egtuna on Mar 27, 2009 1:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
everyone is really down after what happened to Kevin Everette
but I didn’t recall seeing a lot of injuries on kickoffs, except when players get tackled out of bounds
by AustonianAggie on Mar 27, 2009 1:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Last year, it did seem like there were more injuries on kick-offs than ever before.
I can’t remember the guys name, but he was on the Texans. There were several scary ones last year
by texstar on Mar 27, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, I rememer at least 3 that took extended time before a player was helped off the field.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Mar 27, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A wedgie for the refs
How do they define a wedge? Is it the four guys holding hands, or how close they are together at the point of contact? 4 guys shoulder to shoulder on the 40 yard line is a wedge but what about the same guys in what they call a ‘finger 4 flying formation’? (jump in here AirforceBat)
I’m afraid the wedge is going to become like obscenity – the I can’t describe it, but I know it when I see it – kind of thing.
This sounds like one of those calls that a ref will have to make that will really generate controversy.
"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams
by Jim Vance on Mar 27, 2009 2:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dante Hallish
I don’t remember Dante Hall ever using his wedge, hence the nickname “human joystick”. Hall was arguably the best kick returner this decade until Devin Hester came along and stole the show, then Hall thought he could play wideout in the NFL.
Look for the “quick” returners to come back where speed may not be such a factor as quickness and agility.
by gunnerklein on Mar 27, 2009 2:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good call on the quick returners vs
the lanky fast one. It becomes more like a punt return now.
And Raf, excellent article as always.
by Ridgelake on Mar 27, 2009 3:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
That SOB.
I remember me and my buddy were up in the stands being like “what the hell has Dante Hall done lately” right before he returned a punt for a TD.
But then Dallas proceeded to beat the crap out of them, and I will always remember that game because of the famous Romo run.
Webster's definition of irony: Keyshawn Johnson calling another football player selfish.
by AirforceBat on Mar 27, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"and the legend just grows!" - Joe Buck
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Mar 28, 2009 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think now we will see more punt return type guys
on kickoff returns. The “get up the field guys” wont be as effective now.
I gave up torture for Lent. Between now and Easter plagiarists will be humanely euthanized.
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Mar 27, 2009 5:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Owners always add new wrinkles...
They always look at injury producers to apply fixes. Did this truly deserve a fix or did KO returns suddenly run amok? Perhaps its just another way to ‘level’ the playing field for contenders like Minnysota.
by Keys80 on Mar 27, 2009 7:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what HUGE advantage it is for
the 4 wedge guys to HOLD HANDS. If the same four guys are blocking side by side, even shoulder to shoulder, what advantage have they lost without holding hands?
Imagine holding hands with another player, while a SAM LB runs full spead to break your hands apart. If I’m one of the four wedge guys, I’d rather have my hands up in front of me to hit this guy head on, rather than trying to “close line” him with my hand grasping someone else’s hand.
Maybe I don’t understand, but what are the wedge guys really losing by NOT being able to HOLD HANDS?
by BishopWest on Mar 27, 2009 7:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They don't hold hands while blocking. They do it to maintain their line.
Otherside, their lines would break up.
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 7:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they kept holding hands while wedgebusters flew at them the broken arms...
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and disclocated elbows would pile up fast.
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the reply, please explain then...
what advantage is LOST by not holding hands? Can they not manitain a line without holding hands?
by BishopWest on Mar 27, 2009 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not as easy as you think
You have four guys who need to move upfield together at the same rate of speed. Some are much bigger than each other and you want them to space themselves as closely as possible. They’re not looking at each other and they don’t want to sprint too fast, because the return has to time and direct his cuts off what happens to them.
by Rafael Vela on Mar 27, 2009 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, that does make sense
I guess it is just hard to believe that disallowing “hand holding” could really make a radical change in the whole return game
by BishopWest on Mar 27, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great write up, by the way, Raf
your insight into the game is a rare find
by BishopWest on Mar 27, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure
by tyler2 on Mar 27, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I can see this rule change causing more exciting returns
Instead of almost everybody bunched in to one small area, guys will use the whole field. I think there will be more long returns.
by StillHateTheGiants on Mar 27, 2009 8:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
According to Raf's article the reason is....
The NFL cited safety as its rationale — the wedges are collision magnets, which invited wedge-busters on other teams to throw their bodies into the line and blow it up
by BishopWest on Mar 27, 2009 10:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So this is basically like when they told us we couldn't play "Red Rover Red Rover" at school anymore?!
I think this will make KO’s more intersting, like many of you.
The premium of shiftiness over straight-ahead speed may spell the end of Austinnas a returner-he was probably done in that role anyways, I guess.
I’m not sure about Stanback, if they try him along w/Jones-if he’s on the team-he’s got speed but I don’t know about moves.
by Realist Larry on Mar 27, 2009 10:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This rule stinks!
It’s total bs!
George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?
by Aaron Novinger on Mar 28, 2009 11:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















