Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Romo does not want to win?

I have finally come the the point where I am fed up with hearing people on Espn, this site, and other sources constantly claim Tony Romo does not want to win and his mind is on other things. So I decided to write this fanpost to argue how much you can tell he does in fact want to win.  I guess my greatest point to this debate is simply how Romo plays the game. 

I believe his mistakes come out of the fact that he wants to win too badly and trys to do a little too much with the ball.  His fumbles often happen when he is trying to do a little too much scrambling and trying to make one of those tremendous plays that we have grown to love.  Yet lately he has found you can not watch the ball sail over your head scramble for a thousand seconds and then make a play out of nothing.  Often the negative result comes out of those type of plays and simply throwing the ball out of bounds might just be the best option.  I believe Romo's greatest weakness is actually wanting to win too much.  He constantly tries to do too much with the ball and often he needs just emulate Big Ben and be the ball control guy.  I believe a lot of it also comes out of our gunslinging system which needs to be changed, and the fact that our defense can not stop anybody from scoring.  But to say Tony Romo does not want to win is ridiculous. 

If Tony did not want to win I think his turnovers would be cut in half to tell you the truth, but I knew this was the guy I want as my qb the moment he sent off the punter during that Eagles beating.  He wants to win and I believe winning will eventually come to him as soon as he realizes he does not always have to make that big play to win.  Tony Romo is a winner and has already sketched his name in many of the Qb records for one of the greatest teams on this Earth. 

The boy can play, and the boy can win as we can see in his regular season record.  Translatiing this into the playoffs is the next step, and already hearing he is working with Roy throwing the ball is showing me I do not want Cutler, I do not want Peyton Manning , I may want Tom Brady (but who wouldnt), but our boy is right here, and he will eventually take us through this playoff drought.  I am just as eager this year as last year and can not wait to see if our Defense will finally step up.

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

2 recs  |  Comment 144 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I don't think

You’ll get any arguements about Tony’s competitive fire.
If he didn’t have the will and desire….He’d have never gone from being an UDFA
To the starting QB’s of the most recognizable team in all of sports!!!!

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Mar 29, 2009 3:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess I am addressing the people who think his mind is on other things

If that were so he would not already be practicing with Roy, and he would not be out there trying to make play after play. You can tell he does his film study because of the way he is able to throw the ball into coverage. I guess I am just tired of hearing the Cutler talks and all the other things, I think he is going to be a good qb for at least 5 more years and I am really glad he is our qb. It could be worse what if Brad was actually our starter. I think people have just been real spoiled with Tony not realizing everything he has already done for us.

by rioplayer7 on Mar 29, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel your pain..

but on this site EVERY recognizable name (and some that aren’t) that gets cut by another team is eventually discussed as a candidate to come to the Cowboys. Someone even posted the possibility of signing Micheal Vick for Pete’s sake..The QB position is no different than any other in that regard. You just have to ignore it/not even click on it. I feel the way you do, you would have thought his 3 game absence last year would have emphasized his value. Instead it turned into how lousy the back up QB was more than how valuable our starter is…oh well.

by Benthere on Mar 29, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

very true

Cowboys fans are spoiled rotten as 90% of fans of other NFL teams would absolutely love to have #9 leading their team every Sunday.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

great post rioplayer, very well said

I think as part of his maturation process, Tony will be able to walk that fine line between trying to make something out of nothing and just punting and trusting his D. Cowboys fans just need to be patient, not too many QBs become HOF caliber in less than 4 seasons of play and the ones that have had great championship caliber defenses to trust and rely on.

Romo does try and want to do too much because of his extreme competitive nature and I wouldn’t want it any other way.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 6:38 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here ya go Terry

I’ve kept out of this argument because I think it’s inane. For better or worse, Romo is our QB for the next 2 or 3 years.

There are only a handful of teams that are not looking for their franchise QB, and even then, most know that they have a lesser talent than is necessary to be a championship team. Sure, you can compensate on rare occasions with a great D, a power running game, and even with a better gameplan. But the single most important position to create a great team is with a great QB.

The question is whether Tony Romo is a great QB. I profer that as of today, he’s not.

To me, he’s comparable to Danny White, Randal Cunningham, Jake Delhome, Drew Brees, and even McScabb. Wonderful talents that simply did not take the next step to become a great QB.

Could he? I don’t know. As a passer, he’s shown outstanding potential and production. You cannot dismiss his record or statistics.

But, to me, he’s limited. Like the draft prospects, there is an upside. I think that Tony’s physical limitations (height, bulk, arm strength, and speed) will not change and are less than “ideal”. These can be overcome, and to a great extent, he has.

But his decision-making, leadership, and poise will determine if he ever becomes great. I’m hopeful, under Red Ball’s tutelage, that he can take the next step. I just don’t know if he has the “it” factor that allows one to become great. Whether you call it inner fire, mental toughness, or whatever; Tony needs to develop “it”, or he will forever be good…just not great.

Res firma mitescere nescit

by Fighter15 on Mar 30, 2009 7:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Romo always had the "it" factor

which is why he has accomplished what he has over the last three years. The fact that the team hasn’t had great success in the post season shouldn’t tarnish those accomplishments IMO.

If you want to judge Romo, like so many others, by the team’s success in the playoffs, thats your right to do so, I just happen to believe it’s unfair even though I agree the NFL is a QBs league. However, that doesn’t mean he should get sole credit or blame for wins or losses either.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

QBs are defined by their post season success..

whether you like it or not.

QB is the only position where one is drafted to lead his team and play his team to a title, no matter what, and I agree with this notion.

by j1veturkey on Mar 30, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a really accurate statement

Entering the 2003 season everyone in the media business had the firm belief that Peyton Manning was the best QB in the League. His record in the Playoffs until that year? 0-3.

So, it’s more a matter of who do you like and in which team he’s playing? And as usual, most people hates the Cowboys… Our team kicked mucho @ss.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Mar 30, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

strong disagree

Entering the 2003 season, everyone in the media was in love with Brady who was the consensus best qb in the league. The knock on manning was his playoff record.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

By then....

There was a really big contingent of people that claimed that Belichick made the the Patriots while Peyton Manning carried the Colts.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Mar 30, 2009 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is belichek's team

Bradys good but he made him great

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on Mar 31, 2009 6:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Belichek is a good coach and all

but he won 3 CONTRAVERSIAL Superbowls by last minute FGs.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only 2 or 3 tams not looking for a qb come on

Honestly I know qbs dont grow on trees, but just look at Romos passer rating he is our franchise qb and we are not looking for one right now that is why he was signed to that big deal. His passer rating is in the 90’s every year he has played what else could you ask for? I am asking for the defense to step up.

by rioplayer7 on Mar 30, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

O_o
To me, he’s comparable to Danny White, Randal Cunningham, Jake Delhome, Drew Brees, and even McScabb. Wonderful talents that simply did not take the next step to become a great QB.

Romo is not any of those players’ level…yet.

~Texas Massacre 08~

by TheHeat on Mar 31, 2009 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If anything...

…the moronic mediots — also known as the msm — will merely fuel the fire for one Antonio Romo.

The key will be the big uglies up front giving him the adequate protection that he needs.

I fully expect a bounce back season — with a vengeance — for our Starting QB in 2009.

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Mar 30, 2009 11:02 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What about Aikman and Staubach?

The 2 greatest QB’s in Cowboy history have both acknowledged Romo’s talent and his potential to improve but have also questioned his desire and leadership.

Big Ben has ball control? He had 15 int’s and 7 fumbles last season. That’s 1 more pick and just as many fumbles as Romo.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 30, 2009 11:55 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Aikman is a color commentator who covers NFC games, so he's gonna have something to say about every QB's leadership skills.

Nice point about Big Ben—he’s pretty fortunate that he’s had the most winning organization in the history of the NFL to support him.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

great example

of a qb getting help from his teammates. No way Ben has 2 SB rings without having great defenses, just that simple.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So because Aikman is a color commentator

that means he is wrong? The fact that he played in the same organization as Romo does now and won 3 SB’s doesn’t give any credibility to his statement?

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 30, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did I say he's wrong?

I respect Troy and what he did for this organization, but how can you measure something as intangible as “desire” or “leadership”? Aikman can be smug because he’s won Superbowls. If he hadn’t, would his comments be any less respected? What about Meredith’s or White’s?

Just because those guys had successful careers doesn’t mean that Romo’s leadership abilities are any less comparable to theirs. Sure, their esteems should be considered because they played for the same organization within the same position, but that doesn’t mean Romo is any less of a QB.

Romo’s career has just begun. Aikman’s job is to analyze, but we have as much right to criticize Romo as he does. His worries, like ours, have no effect on Romo’s play.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Old? He's in his late 30's.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but he has had nowhere near the number of concussions or back issues that Aikman had. And Aikman played in waaaay more games, including all those postseasons. That wears on a guy. Romo is still rather fresh to the game.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oops--late 20's (born in 80)

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He wasn't a No.1 overall draft pick that got to start right out of college at 22-24.

Being on the Practice Squad gave him time to learn the details of the position behind some real vets in Bledsoe and Vinny.

I don’t think 29 is old when you consider he was already 26 when he became the starter. He’ll just be a late bloomer like Steve Young.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree - he doesn't have the wear on his tires.

He hasn’t accumulated the hits that Aikman would have had by this time in his career….

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Apr 1, 2009 3:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

although he's starting to now....

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Apr 1, 2009 4:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

starting in that first game with BIG Shaun. Another hard-hitting year like that will make him forget his 20s.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 1, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Romo is pretty old???!!! you got to be kidding!!!

Romo will turn 29 this season, when is 29 years of age old in any capacity?? He’s actually not even in his prime for NFL QBs.

Aikman retired after 2000 season when he was 35 years old, no where near 29.

In terms of playing experience, Romo is very young.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

This conversation makes me feel old and I just turned 33. LMAO!!!

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And who cares if they did?

The game has evolved exponentially since their playing days. Any of us can play Monday Morning QB.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes the game has changed

but have the qualities required to be a leader changed?

There is a certain amount of responsibility and accountability that comes with being an NFL QB and I don’t think Romo has displayed those yet. I honestly hope he does, but hey sometimes you gotta look to the past to create your future and I don’t think taking the advice of two HOF’ers is a bad thing.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 30, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree.

Preseason game vs. Oakland during his 2nd year: Romo ignored Parcells and called a QB sneak to score the game-winning TD. That’s a leader.

During his first year as a starter: He handled the benching of Bledsoe with competitive poise to lead the team into the playoffs. That’s a leader.

Against the Bills 2 years ago: He came back from an awful performance to lead the team in 2 final drives that would eventually produce a much-needed win on MNF against extremely hostile conditions. That’s a leader.

Last year against Philly: He sent the punt team back to the sidelines. That’s a leader.

This offseason: He’s been working with Roy and followed that gag order to a T when all T.O. hell broke loose. That’s a leader.

I’m sure any advice that Troy and Roger have given him has already been taken to heart. Everything else those guys say are for our entertainment.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+100000000000

you’re fast becoming my new best friend, lol.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lol

Give me any game and I can point out Romo’s leadership qualities and competitive desire. Win or loss. Injured or healthy. In and out of the lockerroom. On the field, BBcourt, USWeekly Mag, or out on the links.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 30, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats why I love the guy as qb for the Cowboys

his competitive fire is second to none.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup.

People want greener grass when all they gotta do is fertilize and water their own lawn.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cutler sold his lawn.

Sorry—couldn’t resist!

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 of your points are of Romo not listening to his coaches

How is that leadership? That’s insubordination and signs of his arrogance which lead to his poor decision making on the field. Sending back the punt team against the Eagles mattered not, Romo statistically had his worst game of the season when it mattered the most.

After missing the playoffs he said that isn’t the worst thing that has happened to him in his life. Hey in the grand scheme of things I agree, it is just football, but the leader of a football team doesn’t say those things publicly. Comments like that are why people question his desire to win.

He called a 3rd down interception at the end of the half against the Ravens a punt. You call that leadership? Leaders need to hold themselves accountable for their mistakes if they want the rest of the team to do the same.

I am not a Romo hater, I am glad he is the Cowboys qb. I just think that he needs to find some balance between his child like love for the game and understanding that he is a professional and as the qb the leader of his team.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 31, 2009 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty Ricky.....

I agree totally with your points.Here’s my question to the ones that think it is acceptable to not listen to your coaches during a game. Would this be acceptable in the Military? I don’t think so. Think they would call that leadership-I don’t think so. When you are in the trenches fighting, think it would be acceptable to say let’s jump out behind this bunker and start firing even though your commander is saying “Don’t do it?” I don’t think so. I think if you did that, there would be some pretty heavy consequences right?

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there can only be one leader

so either romo leads ALL the time not just when he feels like it or let the head coach do it.. thats how i feel

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on Mar 31, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Manning has done this all the time...

0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.

by gee-roj on Apr 1, 2009 7:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah i know

Manning is the leader of that team. If he wants to go for it the whole team backs him

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on Apr 1, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm surprised that the Cowboys haven't trusted Romo enough to have some Manningesque drives.

He seems to have a great command of the offense in 2 minute drills. They practically score every time before the half. I’d like to see them pepper some of those drives in every now and then to keep the defense on their heels, so that Thunder and his Barbarians can smash and dash more effectively on other drives.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 1, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And yet there are just as many people here that have posted "Fire Wade" and "Fire Garrett" posts and comments.

It’s all just frustration on our part, I know that. But this isn’t war. And, not to get too political, but hasn’t every war (especially since Viet Nam) been questioned by not only its countries involved, but by its soldiers as well?

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Texstar...

I love your posts, your my girl… but please don’t compare a damn game to being in the military.

Please.

Not comparable. Totally different. One is a game, the other if you don’t make a right decision you can get yourself or someone else killed.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 2, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I admit that the one in preseason against Oakland was all bravado on Romo's part. But it won the game for them and proved his competitive nature to the coaching staff.

Regarding his insubordination against Wade during the Philly game last year, let’s look at what was going on.

After a 1 yard TD pass from McNabb in the 2nd quarter (thanks to the combo of a personal foul call on Pac and a PI in the end zone on Newman), Pac fumbled the ensuing KO allowing Akers to hit a 50 yarder just before halftime.

Eagles 27, Dallas 3

Early in the 3rd, after an awesome 42 yard pass play from Romo to Witten down the field to T.O., Dawkins sacked Romo causing a fumble, which Clemons returned 70+ yards for a TD.

Eagles 34, Dallas 3

On the ensuing drive, the Cowboys once again got into scoring position only to have MB3 fumble at the four, which Hanson picked up for a 96 yard TD.

Eagles 41, Dallas 3

Down 30+ points in a game that would determine your playoff hopes, why on Earth was Wade sending out the punt team on that drive? With it only being in the 3rd quarter, the lead (had they not fumbled) could have been 27-17.

Bad luck, bad plays, but in that type of game the 3rd quarter is waaay to early to call it quits. Wade saw the Music City Miracle first hand as a head coach. He of all people should know that the 4th quarter can be as crazy as the rest of the game.

The fact is: Romo led by making that call. Do you think T.O., Witten, Barber, or anybody else on the offense wanted to punt? No. They rallied around their QB’s decision. The defense sure as heck couldn’t score enough to bring them back. That’s not their job. It’s the offense’s to score points.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Biggrigga.....

I understand your point but this showed me a lot about this team and the leadership of the coaches. It’s not about this play or that play. It’s all about respecting and doing what your coach is telling you. It more or less told me that Wade is not in charge or this wouldn’t have happened. Do you think this would have happened if Parcells or Jimmy Johnson was the coach? I don’t think so. That’s where the military thing came into. I wasn’t trying to get political or anything. All I’m trying to say is in the military you follow orders. You don’t always agree with the orders but it is your job to execute. I remember when Aikman was playing and he would be steamed because they wouldn’t go for it but he never stayed on the field and went against the coaches orders. Sorry for the long explanation, but basically, this told me that Wade was not really any charge or you wouldn’t have players doing their own thing.

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another point Bigrigga....

this came from a book about Tom Landry when he was an assistant coach with the Giants. Sam Huff made an incredible play (I believe it was an inteception). He was all pumped up about it when he came over to the sideline. Tom Landry took him aside and said, “Don’t you ever do that again or you will be benched.” The reason that he was so upset with him was because he didn’t follow where he was supposed to be. He did make an incredible play, but Tom Landry was trying to teach him that you have an assignment and you stay where you are supposed to be. Make sense?

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well then, Wade should have benched him.

And it did happen with Parcells and Jimmy Johnson would, imo, never have sent the punt team out there.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is true....

with me, it’s more of the attitude. Am I making sense? What I’m trying to say is “Who is really in charge here buddy?” Hey, Romo made the right call, but it’s the respect thing that I have a problem with.

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wade had zero say in the offense last year.

How can a QB respect that?

Sitting on the couch, I gained more respect for Romo in that moment than I did for Wade and his premature decision to send out the punting unit at midfield down by 30+.

Unfortunately, since our glory days of the 90s both the HC and the QB have been on the personnel carousel, so it’s hard for us fans to determine who to respect more.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and to cut to the chase......

Jerry has caused a lot of this by allowing players to talk with him about issues instead of letting the HC deal with it. Jason Garrett should be answering to Wade as well. We both know that isn’t happening but that is the correct procedure. I mean, is there any question who is calling the shots in NE, Pittsburgh,Giants? No.

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tex, I honestly think you're just nitpicking with Romo now.

If you want to put it into military terms then what Wade was asking Romo to do was retreat in the face of an enemy onslaught where our guys were getting their a**es kicked, there was NO hope of reorganizing and staging a counterattack, and Tony decided that he’d rather fight to the end on the field than cower and whimper on the sideline’s and start talking about what he and Jess were going to do in the offseason. I honestly have more of a problem with Wade for trying to send the punt team in than Romo waiving them off. Our guys were getting their tails kicked and Romo’s supposed to WANT to slink off the field like a cur dog?? I think some fans would be complaining about that just as much.

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 31, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kameleon....

I’m not trying to nitpick. I just don’t think that I’m maybe using the best analogy. What I saw with this team towards the end of last season, and I’m not just talking about Romo, were guys not working together as a team. All the crap that was coming out of the locker-room etc. To just lay down and not show up for the game with Philly was just down right disgusting. Penalties, sloppy QB play, sloppy fumbling by Barber, bad tackling by the defense etc. The icing on the cake was when I saw Romo wave the put team off. He was right on the call btw. My point is not that, it’s all the other stuff that had occurred in addition. I know that I’m probably not explaining this very well, but does this make any sense?

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess by all my rambling......

what I am trying to say, is I see this more of a lack of respect for Wade. By the end of last season, I felt like none of the team had any respect for Wade.

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can agree with the lack of respect I guess

I just think respect is earned. It can’t be given to someone or handed it out. I think the only thing that can fix all this is winning. That’s it.

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 31, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you on that.....

After thinking about it, it was more of a red flag on Wade in that it “appeared” that he didn’t have any control on the team. I may be over-reacting to such a horrible game.

by texstar on Mar 31, 2009 11:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, horrible game is right.

I still have nightmares about it. LOL

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 31, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember hearing LT talk about a play he made with the Giants back when Parcells was there.

I think Parcells might have been the D-coordinator at the time. He took one play where he was supposed to drop back into coverage and he rushed the passer and got a sack. Parcells yelled at him for it and the next time they called that play LT did the same thing and got another sack. Parcells went to him again and yelled at him and said that what LT was doing wasn’t in the playbook and LT told him “Well I guess you better put it in the playbook then”. It was in the playbook the next week.

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 31, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Awesome.

Shows that even coaches are lifetime students.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

True story

Parcells taked about that story in one of his press conferences. The subject was his current playmakers, especially Romo and Ware, and how he needed to trust them because some of his best plays come from improvising or from their reactions to what they face on the field.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Apr 1, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dunno

When Aikman called out Romo on the Mexico trip I interpreted that as Aikman questioning Romo’s desire.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 30, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Aikman wasn't questioing Romo's desire at all

What Aikman was criticizing is that Romo should have realized that perception equals reality to a lot of fans and mediots and that he should have realized that although going to Cabo in no way took away from his preparation for that game, there was a perception that it did.

It had absolutely nothing to do with desire, just using better judgment.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sold

Just re read Aikman’s comments and I see your point. He was saying Romo used poor judgment.

Game Recognize Game

by pretty ricky on Mar 30, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

Aikman had the vision to see how the media would run with that Mexico trip.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly, it is a judgment issue

No one in their right mind would question Romo’s heart or will to win – that is his greatest asset.

His PROBLEM is connected to POOR JUDGMENT. Not only off the field with Jessica in Mexico, but also, and more importantly on the field.

The forced passes that end up as INTs, the Intentional Groundings, and Fumbles Lost, etc.

Smarter play would benefit Romo SO MUCH!

by BishopWest on Mar 30, 2009 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's part of maturation process as a NFL qb

Some fans here seem to think just because he’s going to be 29 and entering his 7th year in the league, he is somehow a seasoned vet already, but thats just a ridiculous notion since he’s only started 41 games in his career.

In reality, he’s still in his infancy as a NFL qb and still has much to learn and room to grow and develop. The best is still yet to come with Romo, fans just have to be patient, although I realize thats asking a lot of Cowboys fans.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 31, 2009 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember when BP put him in during that 2nd half against NY and never looked back?

The week before, Romo’s girlfriend dumped him. All of the sudden he was the starting QB for the Dallas Cowboys. Then, he picked up some wins, got to the playoffs, goofed, came back the next year with some celebrity girlfiend experience, had a wonderful regular season, got outplayed with the rest of the team by an amazing Giants team who knocked off the first undefeated team since the 70’s, only to come back last year to locker room turmoil, surmounting injuries, and a barrage of criticism.

The guy’s maturation timetable has been in a fast forward capsule that had he not had those years on the PS and bench to develop, most guys would have sunk instead of swam. He’s still swimming and I think that this year the staff and team realizes that they have to be as patient with him as we do.

3000+ passing yards a year does not guarantee championships, but is surely doesn’t hurt our chances!

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Romo sat out 3 games

Plus fast willie and rashard were hurt most of the year so Ben was forced to play outside his comfort zone and throw the ball. I also believe Ben played against some tougher defenses all year long as well so I will give him credit where it is due. Yes his defense won hi the championship but he is nothing more than a ball control qb. His previous year stats will show you this.

by rioplayer7 on Mar 30, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would take Romo for sure, but Ben can also play

He holds on to the ball a little long, just like Romo but they both do what they can to make their teams win. The difference is that the Steelers D can bail out Ben a lot of times, on the other hand Romo has to bail out our d a lot of times.

by rioplayer7 on Mar 30, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

they definitely have very similar games

Ben has just been more fortunate to have played with such great defenses early in his career, hopefully ours will get on par with theirs fairly soon.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we are just missing that ball hawking safety like a Troy P

I really think we can have the number one defense this year if sensabaugh can step up

by rioplayer7 on Mar 30, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I’ve said many times that our defense will never reach elite status without a true ball hawking safety.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 30, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

I’ve talked with my roomate whose a Giants fan about this, I think both teams are an elite safety away from having flat out scary, Baltimore-Pittsburgh like defenses.

by foyesboys on Mar 31, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

That is the biggest hole on this team.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How GREAT can your QB really be

If he HAS to have a Defense to BAIL HIM OUT

by BishopWest on Mar 30, 2009 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I’m sure we’d see Romo’s turnovers go way down if he knew he had a defense to depend on to force some turnovers.

by Thehomerpimpson on Mar 31, 2009 2:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you can't name me one qb

who ever lead his team to a SB without a great defense, even Manning in 2006 received great defensive play from his defense in the playoff and SB run.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 31, 2009 7:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure I can...

Ken Stabler 1976

OAK defeated MIN in Super Bowl XI, following the 76 season.

The Raiders offense was led by quarterback Ken Stabler, who finished as the top rated passer in the AFC, passing for 2,737 yards and 27 touchdowns. His 66.7 completion percentage (194 completions out of 291 attempts) was the second highest in the league.

HOWEVER, the OAK defense was ranked 18th out of 28 teams in the league at that time. The 18th ranking is ABSOLUTELY NOT considered a GREAT defense in 1976 or in 2008.

by BishopWest on Mar 31, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't kid yourself

The Raiders defenses of the 70s were pretty damn good, just a step below the Steel Curtain defenses that dominated that era.

They might have not had the great statistical rankings, but come playoff time, they delivered and were tough, big time.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 31, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not Even Close

In the 70’s here is the Def Rank for OAK compared to PIT

1970 – OAK (19) PIT (14)
1971 – OAK (16) PIT (18)
1972 – OAK (12) PIT (8)
1973 – OAK (2) PIT (4)
1974 – OAK (16) PIT (1)
1975 – OAK (3) PIT (4)
1976 – OAK (18) PIT (1)
1977 – OAK (15) PIT (7)
1978 – OAK (16) PIT (3)
1979 – OAK (21) PIT (2)

Over the entire decade PIT’s defense was in the top ten for 8 consecutive years.
OAK only cracked the top ten twice.

OAK’s defense averaged 14th place among 28 teams throughout the 70’s – that is middle of the pack.

The point is – Ken Stabler still took them to the Super Bowl and WON it in a year when their Defense slumped to 18th best in the league.

I don’t see Romo with those qualities. He needs the defense to BAIL HIM OUT too many times.

by BishopWest on Mar 31, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Romo will be a much better qb than Stabler

when his career is said and done, count on it.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 31, 2009 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They were #12 in points allowed though that season

and they had just come off a string of 4 top 10 seasons in points allowed. They also allowed an average of 14 points a game in the playoffs in ‘76. They were pretty good I’d say.

Come playoff time they kept the Patriots to 21 points and the Steelers to only 7. Those two teams scored 48 points and 28 points respectively in the regular season against the Raiders. They really played better than they’ve been given credit for.

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Mar 31, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

anyone who watched them play back then can certainly attest to that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 1, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why not?

Think of how many times he’s had to bail out the defense. When they allow opposing offenses to score in the high 20s-30s, there is no other way to win but outscore them.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd take Romo

but Ben’s record in the playoffs is undeniable – aside from the seahawks super bowl, hes come to play every game. He just plays too big – teams just can’t bring him down when it matters in january, no matter what they do and even though ben doesn’t have the accuracy of Romo for instance, his ability to buy time allows his receivers to get open.

While Ben has a great D by his side, the Steelers offense has played very well in the playoffs their last 3 appearances. That is undeniable. While I agree that Romo did not play poorly in our playoff losses, he did not play as well as Ben has. Actually, the Giants game is hard to tell considering the wrs really let him down.

by foyesboys on Mar 31, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Romo wouldn't have been able to tackle Toomer or get in on punt coverage.

A sound running game is a QBs best friend. Partner that up with a consistent D and we’ve got ourselves a solid team every year.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

but Ben and Romo had similar number of attempts - 469 vs 450

so the comparison is fair.

In fact it favour’s Romo, because if Ben is ball control he should have fewer turnovers, AND.

for his equivalent turnovers, Romo:
 - scored 9 more touchdowns
 - generated 10% better yards per pass
 - and a better completion %

The big HOWEVER, in all this is that, when it counted in the big games, Big Ben drove his team down the field to a score…. Tony needs to do that – and hopefully with a better team dynamic he will have a better opportunity to.

"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson

by BoyfromOz on Apr 1, 2009 4:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I absolutely believe Romo has the desire and ability to win. I also agree

that a lot of his mistakes are the result of pressing too hard to make plays. i think if the O line and the running game give him some help, he’ll be fine.

by Fernie67 on Mar 30, 2009 9:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 30, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ball control guy like Big Ben?

You mean the same Big Ben that had 22 turnovers this year?

It’s funny how a TEAM wins the Super Bowl, and suddenly their QB is the one to be emulated, like Eli last year. What a joke.

by mhuff13 on Mar 30, 2009 9:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Mar 31, 2009 7:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

comparing eli to ben is ridiculous.

Look at the way ben has played in his last 3 trips to the playoffs. Sorry but the steelers succeed offensively with their passing offense, not with their run game. Ben played good-great football in the majority of them. I don’t care about regular season turnovers – when the weather gets cold and the competition gets tough, hes a rock. That is not the norm when it comes to qbs.

Not saying anything bad about Romo here, just that I think peoples hatred of Pitt blinds them to how good of a player ben really is. Comparing him to eli, a guy whose best asset is his playfake and whose always been able to lob up a deep ball to plax when he needs an out, is crazy

by foyesboys on Mar 31, 2009 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't compare Ben to Eli

I basically said that when a team wins the Super Bowl suddenly their QB is the one to emulate. After last year everyone thought Eli was better than his brother (at least in the MSM) and now people make absurd comments like Ben is a ball control QB.

He had 22 turnovers this year…

You mentioned to look at his last 3 playoffs?

2008 he was great. Can’t deny that. He completely changed from his regular season of being a turnover machine.

2007 they were one and done, and ben had 3 INT’s and a lost fumble. 4 turnovers.

2005 he didn’t have the turnovers, but you say they won with the passing game? They averaged 120 yards a game rushing in the 4 playoff games and 200 passing yards per game. Not exactly a passing machine there.

I would take Ben over Eli without thinking for a second. Eli Manning is the most overrated player in the NFL, now that Vick is playing in the penal league.

by mhuff13 on Apr 1, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2005

His horrific super bowl throw his stats off. He got the steelers out to an early 21-0 lead against a very good colts defense that year and put the pressure on peyton, who as usual, couldn’t put up more than 21 pts to win a playoff game. Against denver, a hectic blitzing defense, he (at least i think) made line calls and got the ball out quickly and accurately and the steelers offense pretty much completely neutralized Denver’s blitz. Both of these games they got the big leads with their passing offense. Once they got those leads, they shut it down and ran the ball.

by foyesboys on Apr 2, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also Big Ben's game-winning Super Bowl drive didn't have all that magic fairy dust involved.

Like the 6th-string receiver catching a miracle lob with his helmet or Asante Samuel dropping a pick he routinely makes.

by MadMick on Apr 2, 2009 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

Romo will go down in history as one of the THE BEST QB ever to don the silver and blue,and will definitely break every team passing record currently on the books. Get ready for greatness fellas….It is on the way!!!!

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Mar 30, 2009 10:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

In his short time he's already broken several passing records.

Nice to get those out of the way, even though they were unintentional. All he has to do is limit his turnovers. That’s all.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its possible

Romo has proven he can handle a heavy passing load without the support of a run game. If he can limit turnovers and stupid plays in December, hes got that kind of potential. He has that Mcnabb like ability (the younger mcnabb from 2001-2005) to carry a team with his playmaking ability. If we can pair a consistent, great defense with him, I think we will see playoff success.

by foyesboys on Mar 31, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you.
Romo has proven he can handle a heavy passing load without the support of a run game. If he can limit turnovers and stupid plays in December, hes got that kind of potential.

And now we have a solid run game. We’re pretty much getting set on offense.

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Mar 31, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it funny

how in 07’ we just had enough of a running game to get by with Jujo and Barber carrying the load. Then with last years spectacular draft, we now have arguably the best running back trio in the league. I’m really excited to see how our offense works next season.

by Thehomerpimpson on Mar 31, 2009 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Potential

gets you nowhere if you do nothing with it.

"They’re just dogs."

by Carl Shelton Hates Dogs on Apr 1, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

I was just getting into that post!

George Teague, Brock Marion, the Roy Williams-of-old: Where are you?

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 1, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now that is one cute pup. Don't let Vick see him!!! LOL

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Apr 1, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just hope...

Vick doesn’t have a lapse and bite the head off a puppy in his first meeting with a new NFL employer.

by MadMick on Apr 2, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, or forget what he's doing and start bashing a puppy's head against a concrete floor or something.

“Oh, I’m sorry. I forgot where I was at”

There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.

by kameleon_o on Apr 3, 2009 4:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry but Romo is not the only problem in December

Maybe, just maybe one of these years…the defense won’t fall apart in December.

Playing with a lead = less chance taking. Which means less turnovers.

by mhuff13 on Apr 1, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice theory

Doesn’t explain Romo’s two brainless picks against the Ravens. No reason to take those chances.

(Romo) still gets excited when he buys a new t-shirt at Target for crying out loud

by I_miss_Switzer on Apr 1, 2009 9:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or the last two minutes in the PITT game

the defense showed up that game big time and whats he do?

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on Apr 2, 2009 7:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The defense had just let up 10 pts in 3 minutes

I’m more concerned with how poorly he played even with the lead that game, not what happened once pitt had every last ounce of momentum.

by foyesboys on Apr 2, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

i was also referring to that when i said the defense showed up.. sorry i just woke up then

But people say he’d be great with a great defense.. well the D was great all game and he can only put 13 points up.

What the French?! Toast!

by thebigham on Apr 2, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was also facing the best defense in the league

in 20 degree weather, I think it’s safe to say there aren’t too many qbs who would put up more in those conditions at Heinz Field.

I couldn’t feel my extremities after the third qtr and Romo was out there in a short sleeve jersey. Granted, the pick 6 was his fault and should receive the blame for that loss, but to expect him to light up the Steelers in those conditions is unrealistic.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 2, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

although I doubt it would have made a difference

as Roethlisberger was wearing long sleeves and he wasn’t throwing it any better.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 2, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Terry...

How dare you question my sincerity or allegiance to all things Romo.
It’s not blind devotion,and I have not been very “Romo Friendly” this offseason,HOWEVER
I do believe,in my heart that Romo is THE MAN to take us back to Super Bowl Glory and when he’s done…All cowboys records (passing) will have his name on them!!!!

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Apr 2, 2009 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

HaHaHa

Yes I have…LOL….To be honest I’ve been a Romo fan since his rookie year when parcells took a liking to him. I have been critical of Romo last year…But I wouldn’t trade him for any other QB in the league.

You'll never get in a traffic jam,while going the extra mile. -Roger staubach

by TrueBlue24 on Apr 4, 2009 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overblown

1) Dallas’s defense wasn’t NEARLY as bad as some of you make it out to be. The scoring defense is a little bit worse because of the bad situations the offense put them in sometimes, but you can’t lead the NFL in sacks and be a horrible defense.

The diehard defenders of Romo on here will be like “well he doesn’t have a defense to bail him out.” but he doesn’t have swiss cheese either. I mean the defense did force a fumble to give Romo and company a chance to take the lead in the Philly game. They did force a fumble at the start of the Ravens game to give Dallas a quick 7-0 lead.

They aren’t the Steelers yet, but they are an above average defense.

2) That being said, I am reallllly tired of seeing the “I just want to see Romo win games at the end like Big Ben” type of comments. Ummmm he does it all the time. He just hasn’t done in it in the Super Bowl. Giant’s in 2006, huge pass to Jason Witten for the go ahead field goal. Indy of 06, wanting to keep the Colts off the field… hits Fasano and then they kill the clock. Lion’s of 2007, he leads a game winning drive. And he has often been the king of the 2 minute offense, certainly at the end of the first half.

He has his faults, but I like it how people conveniently forget that the guy has won big games… just not playoff games. Green Bay in 07 was supposed to be a playoff like atmosphere and Romo had probably one of the best games of his career.

3) One player didn’t lose an entire season. Give that up. There is plenty of blame to go around. Every game was close enough this year, besides Philly and the Rams, that one play could have changed the entire atmosphere. Romo throwing ints against Baltimore early on, Dallas’s defense letting up an unexcusable third and long on a screen play against Arizona, a ridiculous touched punt that flipped field position in the Pitt game, there was PLENTY of blame.

My solutions for all of this.

1) Winning. I gurantee all of this isn’t an issue if Dallas wins the majority of its games and makes the playoffs.

2) How do you win? Romo cuts down on some of the goofy turnovers, not all of them, because the gambler in him is one of the things that makes him so good, but useless fumbles and INTS in the red zone.

Penalties.

Defense stays in their lanes, and doesn’t give up crazy third and longs.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

very nice post

The only comment I have regarding the defense is that although it is a fairly good defense, its no where near being a championship quality defense and that is what fans are talking about when they say Ben has a great defense to bail him out.

If the Cowboys can get much better safety play this season, and they still relatively healthy, the defense could possibly reach that level…hopefully at least.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 2, 2009 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dallas's defense can be summed up with one word.

Inconsistent

There were games where the defense looked like the best in the league. That NYG game was probably the best defensive performance that Dallas has had in the past five years.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought they played a pretty darned good game against Pittsburgh

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 2, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I thought the Giants was just a little bit better.

Mainly because there weren’t any big plays given up in that Giants game. Against Pittsburg the big pass to Holmes got them back in the game.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.....

that’s what the problem seemed to be in a lot of games. They would look great for about 3 1/2 quarters and then a play here or there would get us in trouble. If they could just play for 60 minutes every thing would be fine. Again, this goes back to the mental aspects of the game. As we have said many times, the Ravens game is the exact same thing. What’s so sad about the Ravens game, (I was there) I kept thinking we were going to pull it out. That loss felt like our hearts had been ripped out. I can’t explain how it felt, but being in that stadium and watching how the loss went down, it was like the air had literally been sucked out .

by texstar on Apr 2, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

they would have pulled it out

if not for the two long runs as Romo and Garrett had the Balt defense figured out by then.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 2, 2009 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep...

It would be nice for both sides of the ball to be working at the same time.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

NEWMAN!!!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 2, 2009 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 2, 2009 7:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Zombie_cap3_small
The case against drafting a Safety early
N1328130042_30128772_75_small
Brandon Marshall
Small
Shawn Andrews
Ollogo3_copy_small
BTB.COM NCAA TOURNAMENT BRACKET CHALLENGE

Recent FanPosts

Zzzzwww_small
Cowboy`s might have McCoy on their radar
Articlelarge_small
Represent Your Team in MHR's Live Mock Draft
Sb_xliv_ring_small
HutHut's Team Needs and Draft Predictions
Snf18bizd682_406043a_small
Nathan Vasher
Small
Anatomy of scouting a quarterback

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

The Phinsider
Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown arrested on Friday
Dawgs By Nature
2010 DBN Big Board
Mocking The Draft
Shake's 3/21 Mock Draft

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown Arrested On Friday

Photo

Mike Holmgren On Jimmy Clausen: 'It Would Be Hard For Me To Take Him'

Photo link

Pacman Jones' Workout With Lions Reportedly Goes Well

More from SBNation.com >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher