Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Preparing The Defense For Those Pesky Little WRs in 2009

My goal with this present research was to find out if “shorter” receivers had more success against our defense last year than “taller” receivers; and to look ahead at 2009’s schedule to preview the receivers that our CBs have to cover this year.

Here’s the breakdown from last year:

95 different players caught passes versus the DAL defense in 2008

49 WRs, 27 RBs, and 19 TEs

 

I hope to offer a future post on the RBs and TEs, but for now, let’s focus on the WRs.

 

I decided to break down the WRs into three categories:

Shorter – up to 5’11

Medium – 6’0” to 6’2

Taller – 6’3 and above

 

The shortest WRs we faced last year were 5’8”

NYG – S Moss, STL – D Hall, CIN – A Chatman

 

The tallest WR we faced last year was 6’5”

NYG – P Burress

 

Shorter WRs                                       Medium WRs                                     Taller WRs

18 players                                            20 players                                            11 players

87 receptions                                     68 receptions                                     32 receptions

1081 yards                                           839 yards                                             366 yards

12.4 yards per rec                            12.3 yards per rec                            11.4 yards per rec

4 TDs                                                     5 TDs                                                     2 TDs

 

Observations:

We faced NEARLY TWICE as many short wrs (18) as tall wrs (11)

The short wrs caught NEARLY THREE TIMES as many passes (87) as the tall wrs (32)

The short wrs gained NEARLY THREE TIMES as many yards (1081) as the tall wrs (366)

The short wrs also caught TWICE as many TDs (4) and the tall wrs (2)

 

Fact:

Our CBs need to be able to cover short to medium WRs MORE THAN medium to tall WRs.

 

Our current CBs:

Allan Ball – 6’1” (medium)

Mike Hawkins - 6’1” (medium)

Terence Newman – 5’11” (shorter)

Orlando Scandrick – 5’10” (shorter)

Mike Jenkins – 5’10” (shorter)

 

Per this year’s schedule we have to cover:

 

These shorter WRs (up to 5’11”)

NYG – S Smith (two games)

PHI – D Jackson (two games)

WAS – S Moss (two games)

WAS – A Randle El (two games)

TB – J Galloway

CAR – S Smith

DEN – E Royal

SEA – D Branch

GB – G Jennings

OAK – J Higgins

SD – C Chambers

NO – D Henderson

 

And these taller WRs (6’3” and up)

DEN – B Marshall

ATL – M Jenkins

SD – V Jackson

NO – M Colston

 

(*Some of these players may be traded to other teams; after the draft we may have to add new receivers to either list.)

 

The point again is that our CBs must be able to cover the short, shifty, speedy wide-outs MORE THAN the taller, more physical ones if we are to have success shutting down the aerial attack, especially in the "pass-happy" NFL that we live in right now.

 

As far as the Draft goes, I would prefer that DAL pick mid-to-late-round CBs to fit the bill:

 

6’0” – Keenan Lewis (Oregon St) 40 time = 4.49

6’0” – Kevin Barnes (Maryland) 40 time = 4.45

6’0” – Mike Mickens (Cincinnati) 40 time = 4.57

6’0” – Jason McCourty (Rutgers) 40 time = 4.30

6’0” – Bradley Fletcher (Iowa) 40 time = 4.44

5’11” – Victor Harris (Virginia Tech) 40 time = 4.46

5’11” - Greg Toler (St Paul) 40 time = 4.35 (hand timed)

5’11” – Glover Quin (New Mexico) 40 time = 4.54

5’11” – DeAngelo Willingham (Tenn) 40 time = 4.46

5’10” – Joe Burnett (Central FL) 40 time = 4.51

5’10” – Lardarius Webb (Nichols St) 40 time = 4.46

5’10” – Brandon Hughes (Oregon St) 40 time = 4.50

 

Do you think any of these CBs could help us, now or in the near future, in shutting down smaller, speedier WRs? 

Or perhaps you have other CBs on your draft board that fit the bill?

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 39 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post Bishop

Id like to pick up Victor Harris as a Db in the later rounds or Lardarius Webb. But i still remember Wes Welker 2 years ago buring our cbs but i feel like scandrick did a pretty good job in the slot with Jenkins last year.

I thank God everyday i wasnt born a Eagles fan!!!!!!

by regaberto on Apr 14, 2009 11:24 PM CDT reply actions  

wes welker burned us cause

newman was hurt… had newman not been hurt, welker would have at least been contained…

i don’t even remember who was covering him that game… but our corners were jacques reeves and henry, with someone else in the slot?

by CowboysFan4Life on Apr 15, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think it was nate jones, reeves was taking one of the other corner spots, I do not know

how much nate was in there but he was definitely in the game and was being picked on just about everytime he was on the field.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Apr 16, 2009 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

The ones that scare me...

Moss and Jackson, for obvious reasons.

Royal, because he is a stud (he abused us in preseason last year).

Marshall…a beast.

Vince Jackson…getting better and better.

I wouldn’t be totally shocked if Ciskowski had Mickens as a good option at #51

One you missed, Robert Meachem, who I think will bust out.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 14, 2009 11:52 PM CDT reply actions  

I didn't really miss

Robert Meachem

I was only looking at the shorter WRs (less than 6’0") or the taller WRs (6’3" or above)

Meachem doesn’t fit either category – he’s 6’2"

by BishopWest on Apr 14, 2009 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, my bad...

He still scares me

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 15, 2009 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Meachum scares you?

Really? The only thing I’ve heard he is scaring in Louisiana is local buffet lines.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Apr 17, 2009 7:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

Thanks for the update – I’m not scared now ;)

by BishopWest on Apr 17, 2009 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

6 games in...

let’s renew this conversation.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 22, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Bishop

How about speed guys vs. possession guys?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Apr 15, 2009 12:10 AM CDT reply actions  

No love for Brice McCain from Utah...

has been hand timed at 4.19. Pro day times of 4.33

by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 15, 2009 1:30 AM CDT reply actions  

Hey - add him to the list

That’s why I’ve asked for your imput

by BishopWest on Apr 15, 2009 8:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Joey Galloway

No longer a Buc, He plays for the Pats now. Surprised you didn’t know that.

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Also another guy

I’m pretty sure it was Bobby Engram but i’m having second thoughts on if it was Deion Branch that no longer plays for the seahawks. I’m pretty sure it was Engram that was released but I can’t remember.

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 8:54 AM CDT reply actions  

Good

If…when you find out, post it here, I’d like to know

by BishopWest on Apr 15, 2009 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I was right at first

It was Bobby Engram that was released. Deion Branch still plays for them. However one guy you didn’t have on the list but fits in to the medium height receivers is T.J. Houshmandzadeh (He scored 2 of the 5 medium receiver touchdowns against us in our game vs. the bengals).

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

By the way...

If you want a good suggestion on some late round corners go to my post “2009 Cowboys Mock Draft (w/ alternate choices)”. I can almost guarantee we will take a corner with our second 4th round pick at #117. I have listed the following as choices:

Brandon Hughes (Oregon State) – 5’ 11", 182 lbs, (40) 4.40, (Vert) 36 1/2", 8 bench reps

Lardarius Webb (Nicholls State) – 5’ 10", 179 lbs, (40) 4.35, (Vert) 36 1/2", 15 bench reps

DeAngelo Smith (Cincinatti) – 5’ 11", 194 lbs, (40) 4.50, (Vert) 31 1/2", 17 bench reps

Victor Harris (Virginia Tech) – 5’ 11", 198 lbs, (40) 4.68, (Vert) 33 1/2", N/A bench reps

You can also see a list of 20 total players at every position of any kind of need to take a look at and where to target them with our picks. There is also an “unofficial” scouting report for the most likely choice at each pick.

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 9:09 AM CDT reply actions  

www.nfldraftscout.com

great site for doing draft research since this is where NFL.com quotes all of its combine and pro-day info from

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 9:12 AM CDT reply actions  

I think this study does not show us very much to tell you the truth

Your stats have no signifigant findings. Everything is about the same looking at the data. The taller recievers are a little more than half the sample size for the small recievers and just one above the medium wide recievers, yet if you multiplied the tall receivers stats by two they are similiar to the other two. The post is something that really reveals nothing simply we need to cover more.

by rioplayer7 on Apr 15, 2009 11:54 AM CDT reply actions  

I'd think that

a CB would cover a 5’9" WR differently than he would a 6’4" receiver.

The bump and run, in your face, taller, physical CB would seem to fair better with a taller, heavier, more physical WR

And of course, the smaller, speedier, shifty CB would be better prepared to cover a guy with similiar qualities.

Even you admitted in your post that “the taller receivers are a little more than half the sample size” – which makes my point exactly, we need to be more prepared to cover the smaller, shifty guys becaus we’ll be facing more, and more of them.

by BishopWest on Apr 15, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Scandrick

is our only hope against those kind of guys. I hope he’s up to the challenge.

by DoomsdayD75 on Apr 15, 2009 11:56 AM CDT reply actions  

A different way to look at it...

I like these posts and appreciate the research, but your observations are based on absolute numbers when there are almost double the number of receivers contributing to the shorter versus the taller receivers group. It would be much better if you averaged the numbers per receiver (similar to the yards per reception stat). The conclusions still look correct but it is not as bad as you make it out to be.

by DCProf on Apr 15, 2009 3:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree with you

but one of my points is the fact that MOST of the WRs we face are shorter rather than taller, and at least in my opinion, a shorter WR has certain advantages and disadvantages over a taller WR.

Since our defense will be facing nearly double the number of shorter WRs, our CBs need to be better prepared to cover them RATHER THAN the taller WRs.

As far as individual stats per receiver, it seems pretty close, with a slight advantage to the shorter wrs.

The conclusion I was trying to determine, is if we draft any CBs this year, should they be the shorter speedy guys or the taller physical guys?

Hypothetically, will we have more trouble covering S Moss with a taller, physical CB than a smaller faster guy?
Will we have trouble covering a tall WR like, M Colston, who is 6’4" 225, with a CB like Jenkins, who 5’10" 190?

by BishopWest on Apr 15, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Picking a CB based on WR competition

has some validity, but it’s hard enough just drafting a good player so why make it harder by trying to find a short good player. Tuna brought in a big CB, Anthony Henry, to match up with T.O. of the Eagles, but he was an established player and T.O. was a game changer within our division. So there is some added risk picking your players for certain matchups when those matchups change over time.

by BigE on Apr 15, 2009 9:41 PM CDT reply actions  

I can understand your point

Do you think coaches ever draft players based on competition within the division?

by BishopWest on Apr 15, 2009 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Don't just look at height

Look at arm length and vertical too. For example, this is a calculation I did when defending the fact that Ramses Barden at 6’ 6", 34 1/2" arms and a 33 1/2" vert would have a significant advantage over corners who on average are 6’ tall. Yes we know how tall they are, what their arm length is and what their vertical is, but what is the height that they can reach with their hand at the peak of their jump? That takes some calculation and I found that Ramses Barden can reach 11’ 4" (BTW you need to calculate the different between the top of the head and the shoulders in this as a persons arm doesn’t come out of the head). So how high can each of these Corners reach? Definately a stat missing from the combine and pro days, although possible to calculate on your own. Wouldn’t it be nice just to have though?

Anyone who does all of the homework on this, props to you, because it will take you all day to break down each player on every team (and good luck finding everyone’s current vert and stuff. :P

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

To reach 11'

So your average corner (6’, 30" arms) if you do the math would probably have to have around a 37" vert to compete with a WR that can reach 11’

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 15, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the great analysis

Just want to thank you for all the stats. Great to see someone is doing their homework and really moving the knowledge needle forwards.

by Eagles suck on Apr 17, 2009 8:05 PM CDT reply actions  

i think that covering the small recievers may have more to do with safety play

than anything else. Small guys are usually speedy guys who are deep threats. When Santana Moss is getting behind the safety in Cover 3 that’s a problem. Better safeties and we solve most of our problem in imo, also I think Scandrick will do even better helping us in this regard this year.

by The Triplets on Apr 20, 2009 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Largestssescape_color_small_small
Myth Busters: Dallas' Sad Pass Rush
Small
Is Mario Williams on the Cowboys' radar?
Fountain_small
The Stanford Routt Situation
Zombie_cap3_small
Two Options for how to fill the Cowboys roster holes
Small
Garrett the next Jimmy Johnson...child please!

Recent FanPosts

Jason_garrett_head_coach_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario
Small
2012 FA and 1st Round Projection
Cb1_small
Is the long term answer to the Cowboys NT already on the team?
Small
The Cowboys should sign Routt and franchise Spencer
Small
Hail Mary or a 5 Year Plan?
Massage_home_small
Forward Thinking Vol IV - The Offseason
Small
If the glorious leader were a visionary instead of a consensus taker

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui