Cowboys Draft 2009: High-Risk, High-Reward Prospects
By filling all of the team’s major voids by way of free agency, the Dallas Cowboys have afforded themselves a certain degree of draft freedom. The Cowboys are in the enviable position of entering the draft without the obligation to come away with an immediate starter at a certain position. If the Cowboys so chose, they can sit on their hands until the 51st selection rolls around, and simply take the best available player. The team can also now feel better about swinging for the fences, and taking a player with a bigger upside.
Drafting players based on upside can be a crapshoot. Players with an exceptionally high ceiling (maximum potential) tend to have a lower floor (minimum production). Sometimes these "boom or bust" prospects pan out, and you end up with Terrell Suggs or Antonio Cromartie. More often these types of gambles prove to be failures, and you end up with guys like Troy Williamson, or Manny Lawson.
You won’t hear any complaints from my direction if the Cowboys focus on making safe selections, and take solid players with low ceilings and high floors. Those are the types of guys who provide the reliable depth that championship teams need. It would however be exciting if the Cowboys took a swing at a player with some genuine star potential. It is never a good idea to reach but if a guy with major upside falls right into your lap, do you take a chance or make the safe pick?
Here are a few prospects with undeniable ability who also have question marks on or off the field:
Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech- UPSIDE: Johnson is a rare, Julius Peppers/Mario Williams type of athlete. The guy can flat out make plays in the opponent’s backfield, and can be the premium pass-rusher that NFL teams covet. DOWNSIDE: The knock on Johnson is that he doesn’t always bring his motor on game day, some scouts are even throwing around the "s" word (soft).
Jason Watkins, OT, Florida- UPSIDE: Watkins is the type of guy the team could groom to be Flozell Adams’ successor. Watkins has the quick feet and athleticism to handle elite speed rushers. DOWNSIDE: Watkins needs to improve his technique, and still has a ton of work to do in the weight room before he is ready for the big time.
Duke Robinson, OG, Oklahoma- UPSIDE: Robinson is a road-grader, and would be the perfect guy to bring into the fold to help along the Cowboys three-headed rush attack. DOWNSIDE: Countless reports of poor work ethic and weight management issues.
Marcus Freeman, LB, Ohio State- UPSIDE: Athleticism. Tested well at the combine, and impressed at Ohio State’s pro day. DOWNSIDE: Has yet to put it all together on the field. Like Johnson, scouts question his toughness and motor.
Paul Kruger, DE, Utah- UPSIDE: Natural pass rusher with a nasty disposition. Good size. DOWNSIDE: Has yet to prove that he can stand up as an OLB, like he would be asked to do in Dallas. Racked up big numbers against lesser competition, and struggled against top-notch talent.
Sammie Lee Hill, DT, Stillman- UPSIDE: As physically gifted as any defensive tackle in this draft. Exceptionally quick, and also played some end in college at 331 lbs. DOWNSIDE: We have no idea how Hill would fair against big-time competition.
Jarrett Dillard, WR, Rice- UPSIDE: One of the most productive receivers in college football history. Excellent route runner. Natural hand-catcher. Great body control. DOWNSIDE: Can Dillard survive at the next level with great technique and average size/athleticism?
Percy Harvin, WR, Florida- UPSIDE: Electrifying player with great speed and moves. Natural instincts in the open field and is a terror with the football in his hands. DOWNSIDE: No true position. Scouts say that he is self-centered, and that he lives in "Percy Harvin World." May have failed a drug screen at the NFL combine. The Cowboys have reportedly removed Harvin from their draft board. That considered, it would be interesting to see what would happen should Harvin actually make it to the 51st pick.
Herman Johnson, OG, LSU- UPSIDE: Huge (6-7, 356). Great run blocker and would fit right in opposite fellow giant Leonard Davis. DOWNSIDE: Almost identical to Robinson, scouts cite weight and work ethic as concerns.
William Moore, SS, Missouri- UPSIDE: Big-time hitter and good all around player. Probably among the top of the safety class in the athleticism department. DOWNSIDE: Struggled in 2008 after a stellar 2007. Not the world’s greatest cover man.
We can analyze and mock draft until we are blue in the face, but this draft will be no different than any other. When the Cowboys go on the clock for the 51st pick, there will be players gone whom we all thought would still be there, and guys still available we never imagined having a shot at. This much will be true with the 69th pick, and the 101st pick, and so on. You have to believe that at some point in this draft, the Cowboys will pull the trigger on a high-risk, high-reward player.
40 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't think Dillard is a boom bust prospect
He should have know problem playing the slot in the NFL, so if nothing else he’ll at least be a great slot receiver. Plus he has a 42 inch vertical and is known for being a very good leaper, which makes up for his lack of size.
One of my favorite players in the draft
I really hope we nab him at some point, the same goes for CB Mark Parson (Ohio). I’d bet my ass neither one of them busts and both can be had in the later rounds.
Dillard Would Be Solid
Being here in San Antonio I’m pretty familiar with Dillard. Comes from a real athletic family, a number of Dillards have made their mark in Track & Field. I could live with having another S.A. High School Prep Star (Sam Hurd) in the Cowboys Receiving corp.
He gets open...
I have seen Dillard play and, regardless of the “speed” questions, the guy just has a knack for getting open and he has great hands.
Garrett needs to get a clue!
Good Artical
Id like some Boom players in this draft though, Some more choices and scandricks in the later rounds.
I thank God everyday i wasnt born a Eagles fan!!!!!!
I'm gonna be home all weekend...
its gonna be great…I love the draft….. Plus I’m gonna be getting paid…Working from home is very nice
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 17, 2009 1:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Why all the talk of OG's?
I get that we need depth. But what is all the talk about getting a OG to compete for a starting job? I think Kosier is pretty good manning that spot. I also didn’t think Holland played badly the few quarters he played last year.
OT is a bigger concern, but of course tackles rise in the draft.
2008 was the year of the Kosier for me, as in we need that guy.
I have readed several people having Hill as their sleeper
seems like I read he is projected as a 3rd-4th rounder but with so many people picking him as their sleeper maybe he has risen a little on some boards…
Personally, I like him and if we can get him I would be happy
James Marten was supposed to be a "safe" pick
He was supposedly not a pure athlete, but came out of college relatively polished— not too high a ceiling, but relatively low risk. Whereas Doug Free was an athletic, “high ceiling” guy who was coming out a bit raw.
So we’ve had trouble with both types of picks.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Right. Which begs the question is there really such a thing as a safe pick?
I’m sure the scouts and teams may have greater confidence that some picks are more likely to work out more than others, but I’m not sure I buy into the whole high-risk, high-reward gambit. EVERY pick is a gamble of sorts. Even the No. 1 overall pick has a significant bust rate. If a player has exceptional athethic abililty but is hampered by concerns such a work ethic, injury history or the like, then I’m sure the team accounts for this when doing their pre-draft horizontal and veritical rankings.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 17, 2009 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions
No.
I guess I should say “safer” pick.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 17, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree
There really isn’t a “safe” type of player. Even outside of QB and WR, which have notoriously high bust rates, the “safer” positions like OL, DT, and even RB— positions where you would think basic measurable athleticism would get you most of the way toward being a productive player— often don’t end up being as straightforward as you’d think.
I would say running back should be the easiest position to evaluate in terms of an NFL prospect— guys can fit into a pro offense right from Day 1, there’s almost no learning curve, and outside of ability to read blocking schemes and hit gaps, most of the player’s potential should be right there on his college stat sheet and his Pro Day measurables— 40 time versus weight/size, shuttle time, etc. But you’ve still got guys like Emmitt Smith who succeed without some of the measurables, and players like Curtis Enis, Rashaam Salam, Cadillac Williams, William Green, and others who get drafted very highly and then bust out.
Certainly seems that drafting is at least as much art as it is science.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
was early in the season last yr....
we still got Doug Free from the same draft…hopefully he shows something this yr.
Was it when we got Holland?
I follow this team like it’s my job, but can’t for the life of me remember his release..
I’m certainly not upset about it because frankly, he sucked. I’m just surprised that I can’t recall this happening. Probably because it was, shall we say, non monumental .
First round isn't a flyer
There’s nothing wrong taking a high risk/reward player. Just wait to do it. If all those guys are on the board at #51 who do you want?
Michael Johnson needs to add weight to be a 3-4 DE. At 6’7" and 38" vertical, with some of the best speed numbers in the class, he seems a no brainer. So can he replace Spears or does he battle Spencer opposite Ware? Is that too much talent in one place? It’s difficult to pass on somebody with that skill set.
I think the same arguement could be made for Duke, Percy maybe even William Moore. Robinson could be Larry Allan Jr, Harvin might be the next Steve Smith and when Moore puts it all together, he’s a top 10 talent – Thong was too.
A few thoughts ...
Duke Robinson – Yes. He will make it and be a stud in the NFL.
Herman Johnson – This is the guy who is a fat slob and will never amount to anything.
Michael Johnson – I like him a lot, but he doesnt fit our 3-4 system. He’s a true 4-3 End. Don’t see him transitioning to 3-4 OLB successfully.
Marcus Freeman – S.O.F.T.
Finally, why do I constanlty see Antonio Cromartie referred to as a good player? He was terrible last year. He doesnt even start.
Cromartie was banged up last year.
While he is not as great a cover man as people think, he is a playmaker. Didn’t he have like 10 picks in ’07.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 17, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions
And I think Johnson is little tall
a lot of people think he would transition just fine to a 3-4 OLB.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 17, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Cromartie
He might have been banged up, but to me he has a little Roy Thong Williams in him. Both had one (in Roy’s case two) great season in them and then have been able to skate on rep for a while. They are both playmakers but either take too many chances (Cromartie) or just don’t have the ability (Thong) to get it done. We’ll just have to see how Cromartie’s career plays out.
Totally agree on Johnson. He’s too tall and not quick enough to be a great 3-4 OLB.
One last thing...
Cromartie went one spot after Bobby Carpenter…who would you rather have?
I guess that’s all I’m sayin.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 17, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
To me Cromartie is a stud who had a bad season due to injury. I think he could start opposite T New for us.. Actually I think he could start on any team in the NFL.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Cromartie is a stud
He plays the run, he can run with WRs and he battles for every ball. He may not be a top 5 cover corner, but he’s a clear NFL starter.
Alot of Cromartie's struggles...
had to do with zero pass rush as well.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
Johnson not a 3-4 OLB?
Why because Greg Ellis couldn’t do it?
+1 TCB
Duke’s negatives all stem from his physical dominance at the CFB level. He’s got a mean streak and won’t like getting beat, or over-powered in the NFL. The 1st time it happens, he’ll do whatever the coaches and trainers tell him to do to improve. IMO, that’s what makes his value higher. He hasn’t reached the level of play he’s capable of yet and he’s still a beast.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 17, 2009 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions
Martellus was one of these guys.
He had the privilege of having 2 first-rounders going in front of him though.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 17, 2009 11:25 PM CDT reply actions
+2 TCB
Robinson OG at 51, McBath FS at 69 , Lang OT at 101, Hil DT at 117 , McGee QB at 156, McKillop ILB at 166, Dilliard WR at 172and Turner WR at 208. Trade the rest. Lower risk early and higher risk later.
I guess Harvin is off our board....
I wish he would be a JJ project….
Terry and Boyzfan94 you are lucky you didn’t accept my challenge… although he may still go in the first…
Gunsup and Texstar, I am sorry I could give more color on this when you asked, I just didn’t want to name names or start rumors.
We have Harvin already
Goes by the name of Felix Jones. Harvin can’t provide what we already have. Haarvin;s projected to go where Felix did anyway
This offseason
appears to have been more Wade Phillips friendly you have to expect Wade(unfortunately) to have more of a say with what we do in the draft with our 1st 1 or 2 picks. If this is the case what would Wade want?
He has made his name on getting to the QB and as weak and the inside LB class is, I think we go for an OLB who might fall to 51 or a 300+ DT to help free up our existing ILBs more. Remember Bradie went several games in a row with a sack so Wade may see more potential with him as a pass rusher if he can get a space-eater in the middle to free him up
you forgot to add Jarron Gilbert from San Jose St
This kid is your classic boom or bust type player who will either be a superstar stud or huge bust.
His athletic ability is off the charts but didn’t dominate on the field, a lot like Michael Johnson form GT.
In Romo we Trust
He....
had 9.5 sacks as a DT.
That seems pretty dominating to me.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions
If you watch him on tape
you’ll see he does flash occasionally, however, there was never the consistent dominance that should be there considering his tremendous physical ability.
He did, however, have a great East West Shrine game, which might be more indicative of his true pro potential.
In Romo we Trust

by 
























