Cowboys Draft 2009: Safest Bets
When it comes to the NFL Draft, there is no such thing as a safe pick. Each year teams weigh production versus potential. At the top of last year’s draft the Miami Dolphins opted for the "safe pick", taking Michigan offensive tackle Jake Long with the draft’s first overall selection. The year before, the Oakland Raiders chose LSU quarterback Jamarcus Russell’s huge arm and potential over a supposedly more safe and "NFL-ready" Brady Quinn (Notre Dame).
The Cowboys’ free agent moves have put them in position to roll the dice a bit for the sake of upside. However, depth is limited up and down this roster, so the Cowboys could do themselves a favor by bringing in guys who can be solid contributors right away. Another draft class like last year’s ought to suffice.
Here is a look at a few of this draft’s safer bets who may draw the Cowboys interest:
Juaquin Iglesias, WR, Oklahoma - Iglesias looks and plays a lot like another former Oklahoma wideout who once wore the same #9 jersey, Baltimore Raven Mark Clayton. Like Clayton, Iglesias enters the draft as a fairly polished prospect. While his explosive abilities are somewhat limited, you know what you are getting with Iglesias. The guy is going to come in, run good routes, catch everything near him, and contribute as a solid punt returner. Iglesias would be a great value as early as round three.
Brian Robiskie, WR, Ohio State - Son of Atlanta Falcons receivers coach Terry Robiskie, Brian enters the draft well versed in the position’s nuances. Growing up around the NFL, Robiskie has a first-hand perspective on what being a pro is all about. Impute his ideal size, speed (6-3/209, 4.46 forty) and natural hands, and you have yourself a legit NFL wide receiver. Robiskie is by most accounts climbing up draft boards, and may not be available when the Cowboys first make a selection.
Max Unger, C, Oregon - Unger is a safer pick because of his versatility, and because of the fact that first-day centers have had a pretty high success rate in recent years. Unger is a heady player whose size (6-5/309) allows him to provide a team with viable depth at all three interior offensive line positions. Not exactly a position of need for the Cowboys, but he would offer great flexibility along the offensive line.
Ron Brace, DT, Boston College - Ron Brace is a safe pick as long as the team who drafts him has no misconceptions as to what he is. Brace is not the guy for you if you are looking for a nose tackle who will make a lot of plays in the opponents backfield, or hustle to track down a running back 25 yards downfield. What Brace will do is clog the interior gaps and compromise running lanes. His arsenal of pass-rush techniques is pretty much limited to his patented "try to push the center into the quarterback" move. Brace would be a great fit in Dallas because a two-down clogger is all the Cowboys really need behind Jay Ratliff.
Scott McKillop, LB, Pittsburgh - Not huge. Not overly strong. Not exceptionally quick or dynamic. Just real good. McKillop will not wow you physically like a Patrick Willis, but he’s pretty good at knocking down the guy with the ball. Who knows how many highlight reel type of plays he has in him at the next level, but he seems like a pretty safe bet to make 100+ tackles and a minimal number of mistakes.
Patrick Chung, S, Oregon - People seem to be down on Chung for some reason. Maybe it’s hard to shake the images of Chung being stiff-armed to the turf by Marshawn Lynch a few years back. Either way, Chung is a solid (not spectacular) safety. What you see is what you get. Chung has good size (5-11/212) and is a reliable player against both the run and the pass. Chung was not exactly a fixture on the Oregon highlight reel, but you didn’t often see him in chase position on the highlight tapes of any Pac-10 receivers either. After seven years of watching Roy Williams, that is a refreshing thought.
Jerry Jones has had a propensity for rolling the dice in the past, but we have begun to see a different side of Mr. Jones of late. If last year was any indicator of how the combination of Jones and director of college and pro scouting Tom Ciskowski will operate, then we should expect the Cowboys to save the gambling for the later rounds.
0 recs |
89 comments
|
Comments
Great write up as always
I especially like Brace at NT!
by BishopWest on Apr 18, 2009 10:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
I’ll take him asap. After him safety then o-line and so on…
God 1st, Family Always & Dallas Cowboys 4 Life!!!!!
by CodeNamedG on Apr 19, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Safest picks..
Yet you have two WR’s listed.
by JBell523 on Apr 18, 2009 11:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
also, in regards to Iglesias
name a solid receiver, that has recently come out of the Big 12, let’s see
Roy Williams, Texas
Wes Welker, Texas Tech
I just don’t think the Big 12 produces many decent wide recievers, and even if they did produce more it’s still not a safe position in general.
by The Triplets on Apr 19, 2009 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The reason he put them in there...
Is Robiskie’s father is in the NFL so he knows the hard work and he will be ready to contribute from day one, and Iglesias runs precise routes which is needed in the NFL. He put guys in there that might not have the highest ceilings but have very high floors.
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 19, 2009 3:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Subtract Robiskie's name
and add Carpenter in the first sentence. Not a sure thing but the point is well taken
by cow_fanatic on Apr 19, 2009 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
I don’t care who their daddy is.
by Realist Larry on Apr 19, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
Well considering that WR’s come from every school big or small, that’s kind of not really a big deal.
Plus considering the Big 12 has been around less than 20 years and the three best teams in it before that were running wishbone type offenses, that’s really not that big of a deal.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 19, 2009 7:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great article
I hope Jerry gets a starter with the first pick. IMO it should be Unger. With the 3 really good running backs we have it would be great to have a real stud center to add to the mix. Romo would be under less pressure, turnovers would go down, the defense would be under less pressure, etc, etc, with a better running game. Jerry needs to pick up solid players each year with the first couple of picks.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 18, 2009 11:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you don't think that Gurode is a stud?
He has been to the last 3 Pro Bowls
by BishopWest on Apr 18, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No Gurode is Not A Stud
Gurode can’t snap the ball at a level necessary to be a center on a championship team. He has the yips and fails to pull the trigger on demand. Many of our false starts are the fault of this mental defect. Worse, Gurode snaps the ball when Romo is not ready or snaps the ball over his head. Then there are the snaps that resemble a parabala – think of the arch in one half of the McDonalds sign – that is the trajectory of most of Gurode’s snaps; these are slow to reach Romo. Remember the Giant playoff loss? Gurode was terrible that game. Ever noticed how Romo has to jump so as to be better positioned to catch Gurode’s snaps? Gurode is like an auctioneer who has a stuttering problem.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 7:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen
Gurode has a major problem with the snap. Unger could push him to guard. Then we could have a pro bowl center and guard. We would also have a much better OL.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 19, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Push him to guard?
Who’s he going to move out, Kosier or LDavis?
I don’t see Gurode beating either one of those out.
I’m not saying don’t draft the guy, he sounds good, but he’ll probably sit/backup this year.
by Realist Larry on Apr 19, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gurode or Unger
would beat out Kosier at guard. Since Gurode can’t snap the ball it would be Gurode moving to guard and Unger playing center.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 19, 2009 5:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strongly disagree.
When healthy Kosier has been reliable. And can move, something few of our linemen can do.
You need someone to pull sometimes.
by Realist Larry on Apr 20, 2009 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you say a rookie...
Can beat anyone out?
He hasn’t played one snap in the NFL.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, Unger would certainly be an upgrade over Proctor
you can’t really argue that point.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 20, 2009 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well you would definitly hope so.
I mean the odds are that he’s better than Proctor, but then again he could be Winston Justice.
I COULD argue it. I wouldn’t, but I could.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has not played a snap in the NFL
but the scouts would not consider him a 1st or early 2nd round draft choice as a center if he was not a stud.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 20, 2009 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha...
well under that thought, then there wouldn’t ever be a guy that is projected as a first or second rounder that couldn’t be a bust.
Mike Williams, Winston Justice anyone?
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but no one is a sure thing.
Generally offensive lineman that are in the first two rounds or are projected there end up being good players, but nothing is a given in the NFL.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW
I would want to take them too. I’m just playing devils advocate.
Too many times are guys talked about as sure things. All of them are a gamble, just some are waaaaaay less of a gamble.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
nobody is saying he's a sure thing
only that he is better than Proctor and thats not really saying he’s even going to be good.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 20, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He should be better than Proctor
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The OL
concerns me a lot. With these 3 stud centers out there it appears to be a great chance to upgrade the OL. I agree that potential means “you aint done it yet!” But going with the center seems like the best option.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 20, 2009 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate (what I call) his rainbow snaps.
by GalTex on Apr 19, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ooooops ... I also want someone better able to make line calls w/o using Kosier as a crutch.
by GalTex on Apr 19, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flow of the play
has to be disrupted because of his snaps.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 19, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alex Mack-OC would solve all problems...smartest college player in the draft...3 time all academic, 2 time all american
by My_2_Cents on Apr 19, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mack would be a great pick.
We would have to trade up to get him. Several of the mock drafts have the Steelers taking him @ 32. I would hate to see Pittsburg get a stud center and start running the ball again. They are already world champions!
by cowboy1966 on Apr 19, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stomping the Towel
I still laugh when the champions were absolutely trounced by the Titans who took the Terrible Towel and wiped their cleats with it. It’ll be the same case for the first game of the season. Also, on a side note, I still am not convinced that Santonio Holmes got his second foot down (it was on top of his other foot). It wasn’t conclusive evidence at the time and they aren’t going to overturn a call on a little technicality like that in the super bowl unless it is Blatently obvious, which it wasn’t but He never did get the second foot down (right foot stuck over heel of left foot). But hey, they still would have had a couple plays after that even though.
Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!
by ProBowlFactory on Apr 19, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where Are All of You Getting This From?
Why do you believe Gurode’s line calls are bad? Why do you think in general the line was bad?
Romo was only sacked 20 times last year, and our running game was better than in 2007.
So what’s this based on?
His shotgun snaps are too high, but otherwise he’s one of the best centers in the league.
by kindablue on Apr 19, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony
was sacked 20 times in 2008. I believe our rushing was ranked 21 st last year and 17 th 2007. We should have been better, but injuries cost us 2 starters at RB. Gurodes play generally deteriorated after Kosier left most likely because he was helping Proctor at guard and Kosier did help him with the line calls.
by oldboysfan on Apr 19, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rushing Yards
Were virtually identical (2007 = 1746; 2008 = 1723) and yards per carry was higher. That’s a better, more efficient rushing game.
Again, why do you believe Kosier helped Gurode with the line calls? It gets repeated so much it gets accepted as fact, but where’s the evidence to support that?
by kindablue on Apr 19, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know any evidence with the line calls...
But I do think that Flozell and Gurode’s play did drop off a bit because they were trying to help Proctor out so much.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 20, 2009 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My eyes.
Our OLine has been very mediocre the last few years.
Romo avoids many sacks and distorts that #. Our running backs are constantly hit behind the line.
Our OLine is good at short-yardage, straiht ahead blocking, not much else. They’re not horrible, Torrin Tucker-like-just average!
by Realist Larry on Apr 19, 2009 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Eyes
Tell me there’s two sides to the coin. I see an offensive coordinator who won’t reign in an impulsive quarterback who wants to throw it down field 35 yards on every play, who even inflames those tendencies by calling few slants and crossing patterns to keep defenses honest. And when we’re always sending Barber up the middle virtually every first down, leaving us with second-and-nine, that puts even more pressure on the line. When the quarterback needs eight seconds to find an open receiver every time he drops back, the line will never look good.
I will not argue our line is great. But I will argue that to single them out for criticism, without mentioning the coaching or quarterbacking, is not taking a broad-minded view of the subject.
And our eyes see a difference in Torrin Tucker: He was awful at left tackle, needing lots of tight end help. I certainly don’t miss him.
by kindablue on Apr 19, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
First, no way can I be seen as a Torrin Tucker defender!
Please? I meant that, “They are not horrible, Torrin Tucker-like.” He is my dictionary picture of “horrible”. (And another check against Parcells)
And you said you wouldn’t defend them as great-so we agree. They are good, OK, mediocre, whatever word you want. That was my point-they are not great.
And while I agree with your points about Romo and coaching
one of the joys of football is that intrincacy of it, how all parts connect and affect each other
I was just sticking with the topic. The playcalling is another topic.
by Realist Larry on Apr 20, 2009 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rainbow snaps
Yes; they arch slowly and float into Romo’s hands like a leaf falling from a tree. I have a nervous breakdown every time we open up in the shotgun.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like them when romo improvises haha
by rioplayer7 on Apr 20, 2009 2:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
if it wasn’t for Gurodes high snaps, Romo wouldn’t have had his legendary 30 yd scramble for a first down against the Rams in 2007.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 20, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather
have a bunch of “ordinary” plays that go for 3 yards and a first down than 1 spectacular play for one first down. If they would just execute, and do what they are supposed to do, there would be no need for such “theatrics”. I want our offense to be “boring, push it down your throat, you can’t stop us because we don’t make mistakes” offense. NE can keep the “Flash and Dash”.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 20, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not me, I don't like boring
thats why I became a Cowboys fan to begin with, they were always the most exciting team to watch and hopefully they’ll stay that way and definitely will so long as #9 is under center.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 20, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe boring is too harsh.
I would settle for consistent. I’m sick of drive killing drops/penalties. They look great one play then the next they do something dumb. Besides the last couple of SuperBowl champions, have had a “boring” offense. IE Pittsburgh and Giants.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 20, 2009 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats because they had great defenses
you can win a SB with a “boring” offense if your defense is great. Our defense has a long ways to go before they can be considered great.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 20, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A very long ways
We need a NT badly, I don’t think Ratliff can continue to play NT at a high level but we will see he did it last year
by rioplayer7 on Apr 20, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I have heard
Is that the Cowboys would like to move Gurode to guard if they can come up with a good center to replace him.
Unlike a Cowboys' season, in life, there may not be a next year.
by Reno Cowboy on Apr 19, 2009 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
remember
Gurode is the same center that stonewalled the supposed best nose tackle in football
by MdFan24 on Apr 19, 2009 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1000
But ?S have come up about line calls and if we do get another Center, he has played LG before so it wouldn’t trouble him to move over, and he will still get to manhandle Haynesworth twice a year
by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 19, 2009 3:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure Gurode is a Beast . . . But Job One is The Snap
Gurode’s number one job is to get the ball to Romo timely, consistently, and with authority. This Gurode is incapable of doing, He is one of the worst centers in the game for handling the ball.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 8:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Need to snap
If we can reduce the mis-snaps then that would be great. Gurode is a beast and could play one of the guard positions but will Unger or Mack bring the same thing in that or are they just better snappers. Also, what do you do with Kosier if he is no longer starting. Might be a shoppable player if he isn’t starting (paid too much to bench), so you might be able to get a decent OT to back up and possibly be an heir apparent for Weak OT to protect Romo after Flozell is gone.
Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!
by ProBowlFactory on Apr 19, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we need a tackle or a guard, but not a center
plus Unger doesn’t fit the mold of a Dallas Cowboys lineman which is strong and overpowering at the point of attack. He’s not a bad player though.
by The Triplets on Apr 19, 2009 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Unger is not a good fit for Dallas. I’d take Eric Wood over him if I had to choose between 2 centers.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 19, 2009 3:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We Don't Need a Guard
We have guards running out of our butt. We need a tackle but the chances of landing a true left tackle are slim unless we move up into the middle of round at a minimum. However, a center solves our problems at one position and puts another beast into the guard rotation. If Flo goes down, we can move Bigg to Left Tackle, and then we are still capable of inserting an experienced guard (Gurode or Holland) into the lineup.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Move Bigg to left tackle?
Ask Arizona how that worked out.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 19, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Move Bigg to LT
But, what are we going to do in an emergency; what do we do if Flo goes down for the season? My point is that drafting a center covers our bases in the event we have injuries. Bigg at Right Guard is optimal but we have to plan for injuries as we found out last year when the seaon took a nose dive when Kosier went down and when Romo went out for three games. Planning, planning, planning. Drafting a center fixes depth and fixes the Gurode can’t snap the ball problem. Finally, Bigg at LT in Arizona is not a perfect indicator on how Bigg might play LT for Dallas as an emergency stop gap measure and with our running game and our tight end roster, etc.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 11:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if Free and McQuistan are gonna hang around on this roster
They better get ready to play eventually. What’s the point of having backup tackles if they can’t back up the starter. We shouldn’t have to move a guard.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 19, 2009 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we agree with this one!
I don’t get why this team never seems to have backups ready to play.
It is a necessity in the NFL. Esp. on the OLine.
One of my frustrations with the Seattle loss, then the loss the next year, is that both of those years were relatively injury-free for the NFL-they were good opportunities.
by Realist Larry on Apr 20, 2009 12:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes to a Center With First Pick
This is my prediction for the Cowboys first pick. Dallas will probably move up slightly and snag one of the top two centers. This move makes sense for several reasons; one there are three top tier centers available this year so the position will sink at draft time and provide value to whomever takes one of these guys. Second, Dallas must have depth at o-line and a center added in this draft provides the most depth compared to taking a tackle or another guard. This is true because Gurode would become available in the guard rotation, freeing up, for example Bigg, to move to left tackle – say, if Flo succumbs to age and knee problems. No other offensive line draft pick in our range would offer Dallas so much additional depth. Lastly, Gurode is a liability snapping the ball. It is fashionable in Cowboy-land to ignore this defect but my view is that Dallas will never reach the Super Bowl with a guy who can’t snap the ball consistently and competently. This defect hurts Romo, as well, because Romo has to divert his brain to Gurode’s snaps instead of to the opposing defense. I would package our two with something from next year or Carpenter and move up to make this selection.
by Iowacowboy on Apr 19, 2009 7:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Value at center
There will be a lot of value at center this year. We could pick off a 10-12 year starter and pro bowler if we take Unger. A smart guy, captain of the OL, OL depth, best decision.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 19, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe
Unger can play all line positions too. Thats value and safe pick. Dallas needs to keep this team strong from the inside out. Seems thats how the great teams operate. I would sleep better knowing we’re not 1 play away from Procter being put back in
by fretman on Apr 19, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And remember-
Jerry said he was going Romo friendly…
by Mojoness on Apr 19, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Brace
He’s exactly what Dallas needs, but there are a lot of questions about the back injury. Is it just poor conditioning, or something more serious? That would knock him out of the safer pick category. IMO
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 19, 2009 4:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Picks Glory
All of them should be good pros. Unfortunately, I can’t see the first three being there when we pick at 51. Unger is going at the end of the first , early second by all accounts. The two receivers will be grabbed early second if they last that long.
The only way I see getting the last three is if we take Chung at 51, Brace at 69 and McKillop at 101 or 117. Unger would be great ,but we will likely have to trade up to have a shot at him. Good post as always.
by oldboysfan on Apr 19, 2009 6:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So lets trade up
to get Unger. We have the extra picks to do it
by fretman on Apr 19, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually Delmas would be the safest bet for the Cowboys
if he is available in the second rd as he has a very high floor. At the absolute worse, Demas will be a very solid starter in this league.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 19, 2009 9:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I might have said the same
But after recent developments, I believe the cowboys will go a different route than safety with #51 (moste likely trading up for Robiskie if they can or something else) and get Rashad Johnson out of Alabama. “Coach on the field” is what I hear when his name is mentioned in scouting reports and the best coach of course must be a leader and the best leaders lead by example, which he does. A ball hawk not only to make plays on balls in the air but also on the ground. I think the 3rd round will be a safety and #51 possibly a guy like Robiskie if he is available.
Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!
by ProBowlFactory on Apr 19, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why are people suggesting WR at #51?
Wasn’t it the owner/GM who said his reason for letting T.O. go wasn’t because he was a disruptive force, but rather, because the young receivers on the roster had so much potential and needed more opportunities? Surely, you don’t think Jerry would say something that he didn’t really believe. Do you?
Unlike a Cowboys' season, in life, there may not be a next year.
by Reno Cowboy on Apr 19, 2009 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drafting a WR wouldn't mean he wasn't being honest
A WR at 51 would still be a project. Drafting a guy with upside who didn’t play much for a year or two would fit. I just think there are more pressing needs for that pick
by StillHateTheGiants on Apr 19, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
More pressing needs indeed...
but if Robiskie was there I’d take him without blinking.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 19, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grizz
I think the draft countdown clock is wrong as the draft starts at 4:00 pm EST, not noon this Saturday.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 19, 2009 11:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think
OL is probably the safest pick. Flo will not last much longer so LT is a concern. Anyone know how Doug Free is doing? Is he still looked at as a T? I had high hopes for him when he was drafted but he can’t even play his way onto the field.
Here is a 6 round mock I spotted this morning:
by tyler2 on Apr 19, 2009 1:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
good choices, but
i just don’t see the infatuation with Chung, he’s very meh to me…
this is what i do...i guarantee.
by Longhorn on Apr 19, 2009 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I really liked what I saw of Robiskie, reminds me of a Terry Glenn type player.
On defense, if we stay at 51 I would love to see Sean Smith, I think he might be one of the better defensive backs to come out in the last couple of years.
by ChrisRichey on Apr 19, 2009 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
Terry Glenn was a top 10 pick because he had speed to burn.
Robiske is “safe” because he’s a possession guy. Runs good routes. Will get open and
catch balls. But he’s not going to beat people deep.
Sean Smith is going off the board in round one.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 19, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best bring your varisty game
when Rafael is on the thread.
by THEjarhead on Apr 19, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Robinske has speed
he ran the 4 × 100 relay for Ohio State. Of course football is not track but the potential for deep speed is there. I am not saying he is terry glenn but he could be a TO type of deep threat. Right now you cant say that for him but he has some upside in that regard
by Becho on Apr 19, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
4.4 is good speed.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
by Wmillion on Apr 19, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This may surprise some people but I think Chris Baker is a safe bet
I think his character concerns are overblown, and he has a well rounded game and is a playmaker.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 19, 2009 3:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chung a safe pick?
I guess that depends on where a team wants to select him, and what they want to do with him. Late 3rd/4th round strong safety? Maybe. But there should be much better safeties who can both tackle and cover receivers when the Cowboys pick at #51.
Wes Bunting’s top 100 in the National Football Post has Chung at #79. Bunting says that Chung, “Relies on his instincts and read-and-react ability rather than pure athleticism.” NFL.com’s analysis of Chung’s weaknesses reminds me of all the reasons why Roy (SS) Williams is no longer a part of the Cowboys.
Unlike a Cowboys' season, in life, there may not be a next year.
by Reno Cowboy on Apr 19, 2009 5:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Opinions vary across the board on Chung.
Some people have him in the top 45-50 prospects. I listed Chung as a safer bet because nothing about his game says he will be a failure. There aren’t any signs that point to him being Troy Polamalu, but his bust potential is low.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 19, 2009 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I watch a lot of pac 10 football since I’m from Oregon, and I’m telling you, you didn’t see him chasing down WR’s who had somehow slipped behind the coverage and Byrd is slow so he had to play over the top some. He’s played both strong and free safety and he’s tough and ultra competitive something i think Roy lost to an extent and when he lost that he lost his edge. imo the reason Roy isn’t around anymore is because he his competitiveness and his destroyer mentality, Chung brings the good qualities of Roy without the bad. Plus, there is no reason to overreact. We had a big SS safety tank, that doesn’t mean all of them are bad, plus I’ll wager Chung is better in coverage than Roy ever was.
by The Triplets on Apr 20, 2009 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
PROCTOR
The only thing I would add is Cory Proctor cannot be a part of the O-Line next year. Nice guy, but he is not a very good player. We also need a better Line coach. I am not a fan of Hudson Houck and I remember when he was a coach here last time that the line did not handle blitzes very well and they certainly didn’t handle them well last year. Proctor and Houck are weak links.
Ahab the Arab
by damnarab2 on Apr 19, 2009 8:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you on Proctor
But I want to see Houck run the line in a year where the entire offense isn’t compromised by injury.
"I see the door, I just get off on running through the wall." - Young Tripp
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 19, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















