Cory Procter signs his tender (plus other Cowboys news)
Cory Procter signed his $1.54 million tender. Best guess is he becomes the primary backup center, with the ability to move to guard and Montrae Holland becomes the primary guard backup. Pat McQuistan can swing between tackle and guard while Doug Free is a pure tackle backup. But that's before the draft which could shakeup that part of the roster.

Speaking of shaking things up, Isaiah Stanback wants to do a little ‘Wildcat' and thought he was going to get some action in a game last year after they practiced it during the week. But so far, the coaches haven't mentioned it for this year.
Although Stanback said he ran a few plays from the "Wildcat" in practice last season, it was never used in a game. So far this off-season, Stanback said he hasn't heard anything about adding it to the playbook.
"No one from the organization has said anything to me about it," he said. "Until I hear something from the coaches, or until I see it, I'll treat it as just talk. But we'll see what happens. Hopefully, we can do some different things like that this year."

"I'm competing for a job like everybody else," Crayton said. "But I do feel like I'm a starter unless someone takes it from me. I feel like I am the guy opposite Roy, until someone takes it from me. And if they do, then I have to take it like a man and play my role."
Jason Witten is talking about his involvement with the T.O. Affair:
"To get perceived to be in the middle of that, that bothers you," Witten said. "I can take that. Tony is a good friend, but he's the quarterback, he's a leader, man. This is a professional football team. You can't worry about that stuff."

OLB Lawrence Sidbury from Richmond will visit the 'Boys.
Sidbury, who has visited the Buffalo Bills and will visit the Philadelphia Eagles, Dallas Cowboys, St. Louis Rams and Tennessee Titans, stood on his numbers from the combine.

Marty B is becoming quite the new-media sensation. First, there was his controversial YouTube rap that got him fined and was removed. But he persevered and created more raps on YouTube. He moved on to Twitter and BTB-reader alienasia has cataloged some his better lines in this FanPost. Then BTB-reader jsams let us know that Marty B has signed on to blog with the DMN in this FanShot.
I'll leave you with another Marty B 'tweet':
"I jus had the sexiest fedex woman ever deliver my boxes. Wow. She was hot. Made me wanna order more stuff, wonder if she came n a box?"
Marty B, here's an idea for something in a box for your FedEx lady.
0 recs |
86 comments
|
Comments
1st
BTW… the Bears overpaid. Badly.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 2, 2009 5:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You might not say that . . .
if you were a fan who has lived through the ir QB history. No way they overpaid. They could blow four first round picks trying to find their QB and wind up with Grosmans or worse. Getting a young, proven QB deseves a very high price.
by Blammo on Apr 2, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure if you actually get a young proven QB
Other QBs have come in with even better arms and went home early because of bad heads
by birdness on Apr 2, 2009 7:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
depends
he’s a 25 year old, proven QB. How many young, proven QBs are in the NFC?
I’ll repeat my Favre story. Green Bay paid a first for him and he spent his rookie season
on Atlanta’s bench. When he proved himself, Detroit had Erik Kramer, Chicago had
Jim Harbaugh and Minnesota had Rich Gannon.
Green Bay was the only team that decade with a stable, consistent QB. They made the
playoffs the first six years Favre opened the season as their starter.
Chicago plays in a weak division. They just moved way, way up in the NFC pecking order.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 2, 2009 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't they still need a LT?
Denver has bad weather, but nothing like Chicago. The Bears have a decent running game and a decent D but that’s about it. They are a team with real needs, what happens without back to back first round picks. How will Cutler play with the Bears WRs? Maybe they move up, maybe they sink. It’s a huge risk/reward move on their part.
The Bears bought high, what did they miss by not waiting. The Broncos would still have a disgruntled QB. They had alternative directions, It’s not like Brady Quinn stopped sitting on the bench.
by birdness on Apr 2, 2009 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cutler and Earl Bennet
Are going to light it up for the Bears. It will be so 2005.
by Blammo on Apr 2, 2009 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol
George Teague, Brock Marion--we need you!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that a good thing?
Didn’t Vandy have a losing record?
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ohhh.. I see your point
but, giving up all of that seems like it would be tough to build around him.. They might have the worst WR core in the league. If I am the Bears, I sign T. Holt immediately.
Cutler is proven, but that offense is Denver was stacked. Interested to see if he can get it done with scraps like D. Brees.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
by Wmillion on Apr 3, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
offense was stacked?
Idk who was there solid RB? And the O can only do so much Denvers D was horrible
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Apr 3, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd STRONGLY disagree
How can you put a price on a franchise QB, one who is just starting to enter the beginning of his prime? Chicago hasn’t had a reliable QB in 22 years.
Draft picks can be overvalued. What will Denver do with those 2 first rounders? is there any guarantee that they will get a player like Cutler? Or will it be more like Elvis Dumervil, one of their other recent first round picks? Or perhaps Ebenezer Ekuban, Courtney Brown, Dewayne Robertson, or Gerard Warren, all first round picks who the Broncos recently employed on their defensive line?
Cutler is a much surer thing than a mid first round.
Also, CUTLER IS CHEAP AS ALL HECK. He is making about the same thing Orton is this year, assuming the Bears don’t re-do his deal. This is not a deal like the Chiefs’, where they get Matt Cassell and then have to pay him $14MM this season.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"How can you put a price on a franchise QB"?
Uh… they just did. Don’t get me wrong. I like Cutler. Alot. But the Bears gave up too much. The No. 18 overall (which is gold given the draft cost of the top 15 picks), next year’s No.1, and No. 3 AND their own starting QB? You can’t just dismiss Orton like he’s practice squad fodder. He’s still a young starting QB in this league, even if he’s in the bottom half. They gave up alot for what amounts to an good upgrade. And you’re not going to convince me that giving up all those high picks is no big deal because picks can be blown. Anyone remember what players Seattle took for the Galloway picks? I sure don’t. Denver has egg on its face for the whole Cutler fiasco, but this sure softens the blow…
by Boundforbeach on Apr 2, 2009 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ahhmm
How about an MVP who broke the rushing TD record for a season in Shaun Alexander? They also got Koren Robinson too.
by Sean N on Apr 2, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two first round picks plus a decent starting QB is too much IMO.
Cutler will have to prove that he deserves such a high price. He’s got a lot of talent, but hes a big crybaby wuss in my mind.
Ooooh the coach wanted to trade me…I’m gonna cry and pout and not play anymore!
by Sean N on Apr 2, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
one can argue that next years Bear's first round will be low, but still it is what it is:
a first round pick. I for one thought that nobody would give 2 first rounders in NFL anymore, but …who am I to say, now Denver has 4 first round picks in the next 2 drafts, they can get a QB and still deal for Peppers if they want to.
by dcfanz on Apr 2, 2009 6:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, they can get a QB...
…but there is no guarantee as to whether that QB will be decent or not. See: Alex Smith: See: Cade McNown. See: Matt Leinart. And dozens of other examples.
What the Bears did is get a PROVEN starting QB (13-1 in games where his defense allowed 21 or fewer points; 65 career TDs to 50 something picks despite being forced to play as a rookie, which skews his numbers badly) for a mid first round pick.
Let’s say Denver uses the Bears two first rounders on players in that 16-24 range in the next two years. So they get a Joe Flacco and a Sam Baker. Or a Felix Jones and a Mike Jenkins. Do you really put those pairs of players, even as good for their positions as they can be, on the same level of value as a franchise quarterback, just about to enter his 10 year prime? A proven stud at the most valuable position in all of sports?
I don’t get your thinking on this at all. Denver did what they had to do, and they got probably about the best value they could for a player who didn’t want to play for them. But to say the Bears came away badly in this deal— to say that Jay Cutler is only a moderate upgrade over KYLE ORTON, one of the NFL’s worst starters over the past 3 years— is ludicrous to me.
People value the potential of draft picks too much. I’d rather have the bird in the hand— Cutler— over the potential two in the bush. Look at Denver’s recent first round draft pick history and I would think you’d agree.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Bears have Forte, Great D, Great TE, and now a Great QB.. wow bears are going to be scarier…
Just like with dallas how everyone says we had a first round pick and got RW.
I know during those 5-11 seasons i’d love to give quincy carter and 2 first round picks for brees or bulger
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Apr 3, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great?
They have a potentially great TE. Olson has 974 Career yards and 7 TDS… lets not put him in the great category yet.
The defense last year was NOT great. They were the 21st ranked defense in the league.
I’m not saying they can’t be great again, but they aren’t as stacked as you’re making them out to be.
That being said, I think the move was great. You can spend years looking for a good QB, see Dallas.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Olson is good, young, has upside, but I don’t know I’d be so quick to label him great or even among the top TE’s yet.
Also Chicago’s defense is getting older and needs some infusion of youth which will be harder now that they gave up 2 firsts and a 3rd for Cutler.
Regardless, they got a talented QB finally after decades of mediocrity. So I’d say they took a big step forward. They need to get a top tier WR now to take advantage of Cutlers arm.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 3, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/fo-espn-feature-columns/2009/espn-insider-cutler-trade-biggest-ever
“It is possible that Jay Cutler is the most valuable young talent ever traded after already establishing himself as a Pro Bowl-quality player. The quarterbacks listed in his similarity scores are a collection of Hall of Famers and near-Hall of Famers. Perhaps my favorite Cutler stat: Cutler has more years in the DYAR top ten (two) than all Chicago quarterbacks combined since 1994 (one).”
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude... if you want to play cite a mediot to support your argument...
there are at least a half dozen mediots weighing in that this was a Mini- Herschel Trade and that the Bears got fleeced. I generally agree with most of what you say Tim, but you’re way way off on this one.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 3, 2009 7:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
didnt he post the link?
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Apr 3, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree, I guess
Having lived in Chicago for a while now, I still think this is one of the smarter moves the Bears have made in a long time. But we’ll see how it plays out.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 3, 2009 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
Cutler’s a great addition for the Bears. They are instantly better and this is an exciting time for their team. But they paid a king’s ransom for him. That’s all I’m saying. For their sake, they better hope he can deliver, or the Bears fans can join the legions of Vikings fans who are still fuming over “The Trade.”
by Boundforbeach on Apr 3, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about the Bears spotty track record of drafting skill positions in the 1st Round?
Over the past dozen or so years, they’ve drafted two busts at RB in Curtis Enis and Cedric Benson and Cade McNown (colossal bust) and of course Grossman at QB. Throw in David Terrell and you have three guys who are out of the league altogether and another (Benson) who’s barely still in the NFL; of course, I mean he’s playing for the Bengals. The Bears just don’t pick disappointments at the skill positions; they pick guys who are barely pro players at all.
With a track record like that, it’s a pretty long shot the Bears would hit on both the 1st-rounders they gave up for Cutler; especially if they were spending those picks on skill positions.
by MadMick on Apr 3, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't look at it that way...
If you believe in the widely accepted maxim that great teams are built through the draft, then high picks are, and will always remain, of great value. If a team has a terrible record of picking busts, then fire the guy making the picks. (unless he’s also the owner). If you are going to rely on a historical record of bad picks to justify the complete devaluation of draft picks themselves, then you’re going down a slippery slope. What you are saying, in essence, is that high draft picks have no little value because a team sucks at drafting. I don’t think many teams would buy into that logic.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 3, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's no one rigid code a team has to adhere to be able to better themselves.
Also I don’t think comparing trading a handful of picks for a potential franchise QB is remotely the same as trading for Joey Galloway (who probably wasn’t even a top 5 receiver at the time) or trading a bushel of picks for a back like Herschel or Ricky. I don’t know if you made that comparison but others have and I think it’s a very flawed comparison.
I’d like to know what the overall bust rate for 1st-rounders (league-wide) is before we assume the Bears gave up two long-term starters for a franchise QB which even if that is the case, I’d do that deal in a heartbeat; two long-term servicable but not great starters for a possible franchise QB. Cutler’s very young. Why pass on a guy who could be the answer for ten years at the hardest position to draft for a couple of draft picks who you don’t know what they’re going to be?
I don’t know that I consider the 18th overall pick that high of a draft pick regardless of what some antiquated draft value chart says. Who were the Bears going to draft with that pick they just gave up? A tackle or a defensive end? A wide receiver; a position which has a colossal bust rate.
For me, the 1st-rounder the Bears gave up this year and Orton is a wash. What freebies the Bears actually gave the Broncos amounts to a 1st and a 3rd. This seems like a calculated aggressive move to me with a great chance of paying off more than it does a team just wasting draft picks.
by MadMick on Apr 3, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a good debate...
And one that is being played out in stories in newpapers and websites all over the country today. I’m not suggesting the Bears are morons, only that they took a big gamble. Whether it was a fools bet won’t be determined for some time.
With this trade, they got real talent. But they gave up a starting QB and some very high picks. That’s alot. Kansas City thinks they just traded for a franchise QB as well. All it cost em was a high 2nd and they got Vrabel as well. I just think the Bears overpaid, that’s all. Maybe the pressure of competing offers from Washington or Tampa made them do it. But ask yourself this… How would you react if Dallas made such a gamble. Personally, I would cringe if Jerry ever gave up that much for anyone, even Tom Brady himself.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 3, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's my problem with the KC argument
Kansas did not just give up a 2nd round pick. They also had to pay Cassell $14MM this season, because they had to absorb his Franchise Tag contract.
Jay Cutler, on the other hand, will count for just over $2MM against the Bears cap in 2009.
http://content.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/salaries/playerdetail.aspx?lname=cutler&player=4067
To me, that matters when factoring how much the Bears and Chiefs “paid” to get these guys. Cutler is a top QB who is also very very cheap.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 3, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
I’m sure KC isn’t going to shell out 14 million for one year.
They’re going to restructure his contract.]
BUT, I understand what your saying. They got Cassell cheap because New England was kind of in a situation where they had to trade him at some point.
14 mil is a huge chunk of change, and they needed to make room to solve for some of the needs.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Restructuring hasn’t happened yet…and I don’t think Cassell will feel compelled to do it. We’ll see, but I bet KC has to eat $14MM for their new QB this season.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 4, 2009 2:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He wouldn't be?
Almost every player ever to get franchised is wanting a long term contract why wouldn’t he?
Sure he gets paid 14 million this year, but if he plays lack major dookie and doesn’t get a longterm contract he has no stability at all.
Most players HATE being franchised because of that reason.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 4, 2009 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
When that package arrives in Chitown...
they just might find “junk” in the box.
"Oh... Oh, that's giving me a clue. Yeah, ye-yeah, I've got a raging clue right now." Hardly Boy 2 South Park episode, "The Mystery of the Urinal Deuce"
I was StarStruck at TBB/BSR, now...
by icStars on Apr 2, 2009 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh snap snap
(said with an 80s twang, if that makes any sense)
Tar Heels started this college Bball season with one goal in mind - that loss to Kansas in last year's final 4 will make this team all bid-ness!
by DalaiLuke on Apr 3, 2009 4:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
they consulted Mike Ditka.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
by OskieOskie on Apr 3, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For a stud QB that hasn't entered his prime yet..no way
The problem is who the heck is he throwing to?? The last I checked there is no Brandon Marshall on the Bears. Forget about Hester. He is nothing but a special teams player no matter how they try to convert him to WR. Cutler could sink in Chicago if they don’t get him some WRs…
by Boyzfan94 on Apr 3, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does Procter's Tender effect the Draft
Is a top OG or C prospect still possible at #51? I think so, I almost hope so.
by birdness on Apr 2, 2009 5:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We need OL help
whether Procter is here or not. The answer to your first question is NO. The second question – Yes!
by BishopWest on Apr 2, 2009 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BJ Raji tested positive for a drug at the NFL Combine...
…SI.com has reported. No word yet on what the drug was, although he tested positive for marijuana during his BC career.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if this was bad enough to make him drop to #51 overall?
I’m sure he still goes in the top 10. Even a positive steroid test barely hurt Luis Castillo’s stock a few years back. But we can dream.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 6:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No, if he tested positive
for any banned substance, I would say pass. I don’t want to see Ricky Williams on the sidelines for the Boys. If he is stupid enough to risk a multimillion dollar career to smoke a joint or if he takes roids to keep strong then EFFING NO!!!!!!!
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 2, 2009 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
…thank God we passed on that Randy Moss guy because of that drug scare before the draft.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I’m not even sure why the league tests for marijuana; it’s certainly not performance enhancing.
But…as I’ve tried to do before, I suggest we make this rumor worse to further influence the slide down the draft board.
So…The best NT in the draft is taking a new super-steroid and sells rock on the field.
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Apr 3, 2009 2:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude, it's true
it’s good stuff, i tried it
Tar Heels started this college Bball season with one goal in mind - that loss to Kansas in last year's final 4 will make this team all bid-ness!
by DalaiLuke on Apr 3, 2009 4:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry Nick, but the last
time I checked marijuana was ILLEGAL. And the point is, if a player is stupid enough or sooo effing hooked on a drug that he gets popped on the biggest stage in his young career, then I would have to pass on him. I would be unsure if he could even make it to practice without escort and then be able to understand the intracacies of his position. I am not going to argue the validity of marijauna being illegal, I just think that doing something soo stupid has to say something about either your character or mental ability. Now if he got popped for an OTC that is legal but frowned upon ie 5hour energy, then we will agree.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 3, 2009 7:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're serious?
I’d say 15% of the regular users of this board are stoned when they read and post. Sanctimony is idiotic.
The last three presidents used illicit drugs regularly.
It’d be weird to me if a young man DIDN’T smoke pot. Ooooh, shocker, a young man is immature and got stoned. OH NO!! WHO IS GOING TO THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN? WON’T SOMEBODY PLEEEEEASE THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN??
by Joey2zs on Apr 3, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and i'd say 63.8% of stats are made up
Just because your friends or what not did it that doesnt mean thats how the rest of the world has tried it. Where i grew up the few people that tried it went no where and still do it because thats all the live for.. does that mean thats how everyone is that has tried it no.
And even if it should or shouldnt be illegal the point is it is illegal and against league rules. And the fact someone would jeopardize that is crazy and stupid.
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Apr 3, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think his post had anything to do with the guys age.
It had to do with the fact that he was a guy who is aiming at making millions of dollars and isn’t smart enough to realize that there are ramifications of his actions.
I’m not going to lie and say I didn’t do some stupid things when I was younger, but when I had something I HAD to get done, I pushed those things out of the way and committed to them.
It’s all about priority.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I said in another post
I stay clean to protect a job that pays less in my lifetime than this guy is going to get paid for one season. If I must adhere to those guidelines however stupid everyone else thinks they are, then I can be sanctimonious and expect the players my children are going to look up to and possibly adopt as role models to do the same. Like I also said, what they do in the privacy of their own homes is their business. If they want to get high with their posse and snort lines of coke off of the butts of hookers then so be it. But, when they get popped on a random, I also expect their overpaid butts need to be shown to the door. If they come out and say they have a drug problem, get counseling and stay clean for their careers, then more power to them. Otherwise, don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 3, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Say what?
I’d say 15% of the regular users of this board are stoned when they read and post.
Of course that might explain a few comments.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 3, 2009 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On certain threads
15% seems like a low approximation.
Everything's looking up, Milhouse!
by accidental innuendo on Apr 3, 2009 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes Mrs. Lovejoy
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
by kameleon_o on Apr 3, 2009 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
sounds like a smart thing to do the month of the draft
George Teague, Brock Marion--we need you!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and Marty B is fantastic
The guy’s Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter pages are constant sources of amusement. I won’t be as pleased if he doesn’t produce on the field this year, but right now I am thoroughly enjoying MartyB TV.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Do we now start the dreaded discussion about "Distractions"?
I’m not.
But someone might.
by Realist Larry on Apr 2, 2009 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
No. We don’t. Let’s relax.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 2, 2009 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Random thoughts
do we care about procter and mcquistan.?
Procter can’t play as shown last year and Mcquistan hasn’t played since becoming a cowboy. Not sure how these guys matter at all. How many more years are we going to carry players that don’t play?
Regarding Stanback. Can we stop talking about running the wildcat with this guy?
I would like to see the guy play an entire year injury free before committing anything to him. His best postion is on the injury reserve list!
by oneforthethumb on Apr 2, 2009 7:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Im pretty down on I.S. myself. Not sure he can sneeze without busting a rib or something. But if he is healthy, our OC needs to show some stones and get this guy involved. I always hear what a great athlete he is. Well….c’mon…bring it
by fretman on Apr 2, 2009 7:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i've said this before, whatever Stanback has on JJ is very damaging,
there is no other way we still have a project on the team roster, not contributing at all. Did he ever play WR? correct me if I’m wrong, but the only action he saw was on ST> I am fed up with projects, slashes and other “versatile” players, If we need a WR draft a WR, if we need a back up C draft a C, not RG that can play C as well. No more “projects” please.
by dcfanz on Apr 2, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Find your pills and calm down
Proctor is not a project. he is a backup center/guard. When you can only dress 45 on game day you MUST have versatile backups.
Understanding this fact all too well, the cowboys tendered him for a 2nd round pick.
by THEjarhead on Apr 2, 2009 8:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Proctor is someone they are familiar with that has starting experience. If he stopped twitching so much in the huddle, maybe he’ll settle down and find some leverage.
George Teague, Brock Marion--we need you!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2009 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not like...
the guy was a second round pick.
I think Dallas paid too much for him, but you act like Dallas just has a TON of these projects laying around.
Every team takes risks.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude...
Its the offseason. He’s a Dallas Cowboy. This is a Cowboys blog.
Your going to repeat the same things over and over.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 3, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
McQ is likely down to his last chance.
Procter just signed his 2nd round tender, so dallas apparently disagrees with you.
Remember that proctor backed up gurode in late 2007 and did a decent job, better than he did as a LG. He is a good backup b/c he is versatile. he can suit up and cover either a guard or center position. all he proved this year is that he is not a starter. you still need backups, and a backup who can step in and play guard or center is worth 1 million.
My guess, they’ll go into camp with proctor penciled in as the backup center and holland as the backup guard. If they happen to pick up a guard in the draft, holland would likely be the odd man out. if they pick up a center, it may be proctor.
BTW, if they cut proctor before the season, they dont eat the 1million tender.
Standbeck might have bought some time with TO gone, unless the boys draft a WR.
by THEjarhead on Apr 2, 2009 7:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
canty
was just reading an analysis of the cowboys and it said the biggest mistake they made was letting go of canty. he was the anchor of the d line. haha. he played with a great motor and made the olbs behind him better. big laugh. also said that igor is no canty.
by maxdout on Apr 2, 2009 9:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Who was the analyst?
Sounds like someone in NY is talking him up to keep it from looking like they overpaid.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 2, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If that was the "biggest" mistake
Then I’d say so far the off-season is a success.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 2, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Igor only played in front of Merriman--on the same side I might add.
Let the Giants spend the big $$$ on our castoffs. It’s better than them going after a guy like Peppers.
George Teague, Brock Marion--we need you!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Resign Proctor?
He proved one thing last year: that he’s not a quality NFL player.
by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Apr 2, 2009 10:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm guessing he's just protection
In case the team doesn’t land anyone better in the draft. I hope they do, but just in case.
Also he signed his tender, which doesn’t really change his status. The Cowboys had already tendered him at the 2nd round level. He would have signed it before the draft anyway.
Feb. 27 -- Veteran free agency signing period begins. Trading period begins.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 2, 2009 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He beat out anybody else for that 3rd LG spot.
Free and McQ or BergerKing never saw a whiff of playing. They must see something of value in him. Experienced OL backups aren’t that easy to find.
George Teague, Brock Marion--we need you!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 2, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOOOOOO
Send Proctor to Europe this summer; I don’t want his lack of talent rubbing off on this year’s OL draft picks.
I guess I have to accept that Proctor must have been better than the other (healthy) guys on this roster to maintain a starting role all season, but that just tells me that they all need to go…not that we need to keep Proctor.
I’m usually not for letting guys go without a replacement in place, but there must be a few fat guys sitting at home who can outplay Proctor, McQuistan and Free.
As much as I want to cling to the optimistic view that McQuistan and Free didn’t step in because the team values their production as tackles, I think it’s more likely that they just can’t play.
1. First, Proctor was certainly bad enough to make bold moves (like trading for Holland), so I think they’d have moved a better player to that spot.
2. McQuistan was no better in his limited role.
3. The backup tackles didn’t play in place of the injured Flozell Adams, so they’re not as good as a left tackle with one hand…
Here’s to 3 to 4 new OLs in a few weeks!
So pardon my disposition; why should I listen to a system that never listened to me?
by NICK L on Apr 3, 2009 3:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
On this point
I will most certainly agree. Our offensive line play was soooo freaking atrocious for all the talk before the season of how strong they were. I guesss Tony and Comany made them look a whole lot better than they were.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 3, 2009 7:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Europe league is defunct
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 3, 2009 7:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but i do miss it alot
What the French?! Toast!
by thebigham on Apr 3, 2009 8:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's what I was gonna say.....
but you beat me to it-LOL. See I do know a thing or two
by texstar on Apr 3, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll see your FedEx....
And raise you a UPS, ftw
http://www.ugoto.com/picture_ups-chick-you-boys-would-love-giving-you-a-delivery.html
Jerry: George is dating a convict.
Kramer: Really? What's she in for?
George: Embezzlement.
Kramer: (Seriously) Sounds like a nice girl!
by HEpennypacker on Apr 3, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Proctor better worry
Newton, Cecil ©, Tennessee State / Reynolds, Dallas ©, BYU
could be drafted late and be just as good (or just as bad) as Proctor but for the league minimum instead of that 1.5 million.
if the Boys elect to go for any of these guys
Caldwell, Antoine ©, Alabama / Luigs, Jonathan ©, Arkansas / Lang, T.J. (OG), Eastern Michigan
then game over, Proctor won`t hold those guys off with a bat.
by ziggy19 on Apr 3, 2009 9:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















