Cowboys Draft '09 -- Lets Play the Scenario Game
Let's run down some possible drafting combos, going on a couple of hunches:
- First, Dallas will get a safety with one of its first two picks. If there's a need position, this is it.
- Second, I don't anticipate many moves up or down, at least not in the 2nd round.
Scenario One -- The Surprise Option
- 51- Max Unger, C, Oregon
- 69 - Darcel McBath, FS, Texas Tech
- 101 -- Jasper Brinkley, ILB, South Carolina
- 117 -- Brandon Williams, OLB, Texas Tech
Unger goes in most mocks about 8-10 spots ahead of the Cowboys' first pick. But sometimes good players fall. Jerry Jones mentioned today that Flozell Adams and Andre Gurode were both players slotted into first round mocks, who fell into the early 2nd their respective years.
Unger would provide cover for all five line spots. He's a center who can also play guard or tackle. If he drops, Dallas wouldn't hesitate to pick him.
Scenario Two -- Safety First
- 51 -- Louis Delmas, FS, Western Michigan
- 69 -- Lawrence Sidbury, OLB, RIchmond
- 101 -- Jason Williams, LB, Western Illinois
- 117 -- Sebastian Vollmer, OT, Houston
If the higher safety on the Cowboys board is there, they take what they need and keep stocking the defense. Williams is another LB option besides Brinkley. He looks like Kevin Burnett with bulk, a 241 pounder who runs the 40 in 4.5. He could start in the nickel and work towards playing all three downs.
Scenario Three -- The Move Option
- 51- Brian Robiske, WR, Ohio State
- 69 -- Darcel McBath, FS, Texas Tech
- 90 -- (trade up) Stephen McGee, QB, Texas A&M
- 117 -- Brandon Williams, OLB, Texas Tech
A very Texan flavor to this mock. I'm building this one on the assumption that Delmas and Unger are gone. In that case, Dallas resists forcing a pick and goes with a wideout. McBath fills the safety need in the early third and Dallas makes a move of approximately 10-12 spots to nab McGee, who will likely go somewhere in the 3rd round, from what I'm hearing. Williams brings a pass rushing prospect in the 4th.
There are many other permutations, but I think the Cowboys will follow a script similar to these. They'll take some combination of FS, ILB, OLB, WR, QB and OL, and just go with the best option at each pick. Review the list of attendees to Dallas "Texas Day" and the team's prospect day and draw up a few more scenarios of your own.
0 recs |
152 comments
|
Comments
I'm hoping for the Safety First option
51 — Louis Delmas, FS, Western Michigan
69 — Lawrence Sidbury, OLB, RIchmond
We’ve just got to solve the safety problem NOW!
by BishopWest on Apr 23, 2009 11:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would be happy going into the season with Hamlin and Sensenbaugh as the starters
it is not as pressing a need as you are making it out to be.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+`1 quincyyyy.....especially at FS.....where pro bowler Hamlin is signed for 7 million a year over the next 4 seasons...fact is...no FS in this draft will unseat FS-Hamlin....period.
SS- on the other hand, has three one year contracts with relatively "unknowns’ in Sensabaugh, Carter, and Battle………again….this so called Safety “issue” is at SS- (ummmwere looking to replace Roy Williams)…not FS (Hamlin is entrenched in the starting role)….and yes……..there is a difference………..
btw….trading up for a QB in round three would be a complete waste of resources (draft picks)
I guess I’d have to go option #2 if those are the only options……..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 3:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+2
SS is the issue not FS and I don’t think drafting a FS and moving Hamlin to SS is the answer. Hamlin is already a pretty good FS and I’m not sold on him as a run stopper from the SS spot.
Jimmy once drafted an undersized linebacker and converted him into a strong safety (Darren Woodson) who became the best safety in Cowboy history. Are the any similar scenarios out there in this year’s draft?
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 6:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We've got to stop thinking in terms of FS and SS
the two are becoming more and more similar.
Jerry Jones could go in his sock, slap you wit a stack of hundreds, then catch you again on the backswing wit 3 Super Bowl rings. So who the hell are you makin' fun of?
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 24, 2009 7:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just get nervous…
…when I think of an undersized safety having to play close to the line in run support. :-/
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 7:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should add that I prefer…
…someone of Rodney Harrison or Troy Polamalu’s build when it comes to SS.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Delmas and Palamola are the same size
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Troy Polamalu benches over 400 pounds routinely and squats over 600.
Delmas, meanwhile, puts 225 up for only 12 reps. That’s just not strong enough to shed blockers in the NFL IMHO.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Polamalu wasn't that strong coming out of college
Thats why NFL teams have strength and conditioning coaches, to get players stronger.
I have no doubt Delmas will put on more weight and muscle after going through a strength and conditioning program at the pro level. He probably didn’t have one at Western Michigan.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would we want our FS shedding blockers???
I agree that you want two interchangeable safeties these days, but you don’t want your coverage safety taking on guards, no matter what the scheme! That’s a recipe for separated shoulders. Let’s let our LBs do their jobs.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 24, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not....5 months ago, Delmas' game time playing weight was 193lbs....Troy P is 210lbs...solid..stronger, bigger, and faster...
and according to you is a major coverage liability…..which is why he plays SS….to limit his space coverage deficiencies, and gets him closer to the action….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
The position has evolved to keep up with the pass first mentality of the game. Im confident that T.Cis and Wade will bring in the type of safety who will fit our scheme. This back and forth FS vs SS debate seems a little outdated. Its the right guy for our scheme. Who ever we get better match up with the TEs we will be seeing this year because we face 4 of the 5 best. Gates Gonzales, Shockey, and Winslow. We could very well see each and everyone of those guys a second time in the playoffs as well.
The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those willing to work and give to those who would not. Thomas Jefferson
by squidlo97 on Apr 24, 2009 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Glory.
How many times do we need to say it — there is no difference between Free and Strong Safety anymore.
by Johnny Cage on Apr 24, 2009 8:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True that.
Plus, I think Wade’s scheme requires guys who can cover—no matter what side of the field they are on.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 24, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we got to stop expressing similarity of the positions...
there are clear distinctions that seperate the two safety positions, and their respective responsibilities……SS’s in any system(especially 3-4) are not put in positions to be covering WR’s, especially deep zones……SS usually always line up strong side, usually within 10-15 yards from line, and are primary defender on TE’s and/or RB’s, with a major proportion of responsibility designated on run support, and recognition of play…normally always take on the TE on the whistle, and either cover,hold up, or shed
FS always plays off weak side (unless there is a bunch formation) 10-15+ yards off the line, and responsible for intermediate/deep cover to the inside against slot/split WR’s, but also must maintain positional integrity and seal off any running play coming to that area…………..
Hamlin does that task well, and was hampered last season because of the poor interior play of the SS’s we threw out there, causing him to shade in closer diminishing his effectiveness to play centerfield, and I’d sure love to see film of him being beat deep somewhere…if any is available….Hamlin is not better underneath, and would make the overall Safety position weaker if moved closer to the line…imo…
A sub 6’0" 200lbs S (Delmas/Johnson) would never hold up in a 3-4 scheme,(Roy does have valid point in that sense) where they are often exposed and targeted by running schemes because of their inability to take on or shed blockers, nor are they big enough to take on 6’4" 250lb TE’s in coverage…….
Roy Williams-SS was the problem here…..not Ken Hamlin-FS…….
Hamlin-FS did fine inintermediate/ deep coverage, playing centerfield and QB, getting players in position, aside from serious flaws(Baltimore) with his near the line recognition/and eventual bad angles, he got wooped up on near the line in run spport…….and he’s the answer at SS ?…not…
Roy-SS couldn’t stick his guy early on(slow to react), couldn’t flip(not fluid) and shadow(lacks agility and quickness), and receivers got behind him(no recovery speed)…..hence the Roy we all saw on getting smoked..BUT…He is surely not sole problem, as many times I do believe it was the CB’s that passed off their responsibilities to Roy too soon, or too late(by playing off, and not funneling the WR’s inward enough… in many cases Roy was indeed a scapegoat, but he surely didn’t do his job consistantly in coverage either, but a SS shouldn’t be 20+ yards off the line at any point in time(a scheme flaw)…and needed to go………..
stop equating smallish(because they are small must mean they are quicker, faster, or more fluid) DB’s/FS’s with ability to cover wide receivers man vs man, it’s just not true….
There is not one Safety in this draft that can stick with a Santana Moss or Desean Jackson….none….
If there is a Safety out there that is 6’1" 219lbs, and runs under a 4.5 40….doesn’t exclude him from playing in coverage because he’s bigger than the guy your all so adamantly pimping out as the only type of Safety we should be looking at……….
btw…Darren Woodson was 6’1" 219lbs…under 4.5 40……everyone’s poster boy for the type of Safety we need…He was a SS for years, then converted to FS…..
William Moore- 6’0" 221lbs …under 4.5 40
Chip Vaughn- 6’2" 218lbs…under 4.5 40
David Bruton- 6’2" 215lbs…under 4.5 40
If your looking for a deep zone/ballhawking playmaker(which we also need)…we should be looking at the CB’s….S Smith, A Smith, DJ Moore, J Byrd, V Harris, S Martin, K Barnes, K Lewis, B Fletcher, etc. etc…..all as physical as the FS’s mentioned, and just as good, or better in coverage….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But remember if you are going to use Woody as an example then you need to remember
what his original position coming into the draft. Woody was a LB that had great speed for a LB and dallas converted him. So expand you pool to potential LB that have similar speed and size as Woody.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Apr 24, 2009 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
nahh...Woody was never drafted as a LB.......he was playing what I played in high school, he was a "Rover Back"....a "roving" middle LB, with coverage responsibilities...TE and/or HB....
other proto-types- Carnell Lake & Steve Atwater
we need to keep in focus that 3-4 SS are generally exposed/as much as ILB’s….and ever more so(than ILB’s) must be able to quickly recognize run/pass…then shed/avoid oncoming blockers to make plays….majority of all FB’s,H-Back’s, TE’s, and OL’s will wipe a smallish DB right out of the play….a SS in a 3-4 is/should be closer to a speedy LB, than a cover CB…. SILB & SOLB are the ones taking a majority of these blockers, leaving the WILB and SS to get direct shots on the offensive ball carrier…you need to be quick, stout, strong, and physically geared to consistantly make plays, and have the toughness to wrap up, and take out that ballcarrier…
I am not denying we need a deep-zone type DB with coverage skills…but that’s for sub-packages in the nickle/dime……I’m all for interior Safety with coverage ability to play inside the umbrella coverage…or deep centerfield…..but that’s not what we need as a replacement for Roy Williams…..we need a Roy Williams (circa. 2002) but faster, with coverage skills….all trhe SS’s available have adequate short zone/intermediate coverage skills….but even more so, they are all strong enough to slide off lead blocks, and bury ballcarriers in the ground….(Delmas/Johnson/McBath types aren’t going to be penetrating consistantly making tackles in the interior, or behind the line) ….they’ll be fine in sub-packages, playing 15+ yards off…..that’s it…..I don’t wanna hear they’re just as good against the run…..simply not true….stand no chance playing near the line at the next level…..all three will be cover 2 type deep safeties…..not prone to making tackles against the run game…If they’re making tackles, you might worry more about the front 7 not doing their jobs…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shedding blockers?
A sub 6’0" 200lbs S (Delmas/Johnson) would never hold up in a 3-4 scheme,(Roy does have valid point in that sense) where they are often exposed and targeted by running schemes because of their inability to take on or shed blockers…
I sure hope the Cowboys are more worried about a safety’s ability to cover receivers than shedding blockers. Because I can guarantee you if a guard/tackle gets on Polamalu or Ed Reed, it’s over. Those guys make their money by breaking up and intercepting passes…not shedding blocks.
by Johnny Cage on Apr 24, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
your right....that's why those two don't play near the line....they avoid blocks by design...they are protected by the ILB's and SS to make plays........
We need a guy (SS) that can roam near the line, play over the strong side(where our SOLB attacks), to either cover(TE/RB) blitz, shoot a gap, or shed and attack the play, leaving the slotWR/split WR for the FS …..the SS is not playing out in centerfield, orchestrating the defensive alignments…we HAVE that in multi-year millioniare Pro Bowler Ken Hamlin….hello ??
I give up……May the best player (SS or FS) be drafted….that’s all….we need both…btw…
round 2) #51 – Delmas-FS
round)3 #69 – Sidbury-OLB
round 4) #104 – David Bruton-SS
round 4) #117 – Jason Williams-ILB
rd5) (insert favorite here) OL
rd 5) (insert favorite here) WR
rd 5) (insert favorite here) NT
rd 6) (favorite) QB
rd 7) (favorite) OL
EVERYONE HAPPY NOW ???? ….geeeez
:-)
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking numba1 with the way him and Terry go back and forth.
The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those willing to work and give to those who would not. Thomas Jefferson
by squidlo97 on Apr 24, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
not true at all
Polamala plays near the LOS alot. You have to realize that you don’t have to be a big safety to be effective supporting the run, both Polamala and Bob Sanders prove that.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Polamalu does it with elite speed and quickness.
If any of these guys had decent size and moved like him, they would be top 15-20 picks. We’re drafting toward the end of the second round, and I think we have to let our standards be governed by that.
by Mandmeisterx on Apr 24, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 Mand...
exactly….Delmas and Johnson are not speed merchants…
better off converting cover CB’s like Al Smith, DJ Moore, J Byrd, or S Martin to take the dime/FS role……
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
again....use Pro Bowl caliber players to forge your agenda...
Bob Sanders is ever bit of 210lbs..solid……built like a fire hydrant, and not exactly know for his man coverage skills…….has NEVER played a full season in his career……next….
Troy Polamalo, is also a well built, put together 210+ lbs… and has been repeatedly chastized by Terry on this very site as being horrible in coverage (now, because of his height, figures he’s worthy for the debate)…..and has also missed 8 games in the past 3 seasons….next..
both are undersized Strong Safeties….very good ones (while they’re healthy), but neither are deep man cover Free Safeties…nor do they play like that…..they are “Rover” DB’s…that freelance more so than any two Safeties, and that’s team strategy to place them in positions to make plays…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good call on Jason Williams
I meant to put him in scenario two instead of putting Brinkley in twice.
both those guys are on the 3rd/4th edge and Dallas will look hard at one or both of them if they slide into the 4th, or so I’ve been told.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have them in the 4th cause they're ILBs
and those guys slide.
But the more I look at it, I think Brinkley gets snagged by Baltimore or Pittsburgh late in the 3rd. Baltimore just lost Bart Scott and Ray Ray isn’t getting any younger. Pittsburgh’s inside duo isn’t young either. Larry Foote can’t have much time left.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1...exactly...all those teams....count on SD, Mia, Pitt, Balt, KC, NE, GB, NYJ, Car, Atl,....heck...alot of teams...
EVERY team wants J Williams on their roster….who’s going to bite first?….
I say we do…..at #69….if OLB-Sidbury and ILB-Freeman are already gone
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Jason Williams really a ILB?
I could see nickle ILB, but also a lot of teams interested in him as a WOLB in a 4-3 due to his speed
by AustonianAggie on Apr 24, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's 241 lbs.
same as Bradie James.
Zach Thomas and Kevin Burnett both played inside last year at 227 and 228.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
241lbs...AND runs a sub 4.5 40..........fastest LB in the draft..
outstanding tackler as well…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll put my mock right now as this
51. Robiske — I’m reading Delmas is hot. Okay, no need to move up for anybody, IMO, though if Unger started to slide, I’d consider moving up half a dozen spots for him.
69 – Sidbury
101— J. Williams
117 — Best S available.
If you could guarantee Dallas could move up to say, 103 or 104 and get McBath there, I would do cartwheels.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'll take that.....
Jason Williams is the key…we get him the rest is all gravy….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm looking at Gosselin's composite board
and the one name and slot that jumps out at me is Sean Smith at 48. I figured being a 6’3" CB with versatility there’s no way he gets out of the first 40 picks, but if he’s there in the 47-48 range, I want him.
There’s your ballhawk FS. He’s already 214 lbs.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh No....
The great Terry/Numba2centswhatever his name is today debate over Delmas VS. Smith will begin.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 24, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
McBath
Isn’t even listed On Gosselin’s top 100. Hopefully this means he slips down to us in the 3rd.
by boysinyabelly on Apr 24, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The draft I want
not necessarily the draft I think is possible, goes:
51 – Sean Smith, FS/CB
69 – Lawrence Sidbury, OLB
101 – Jason Williams, ILB
117 – Sebastian Vollmer, OT
I think the last three are possible, with some minor moving around possibly needed. I’m still skeptical about Smith slipping, but am willing to be pleasantly surprised.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sean Smith
has been at the top of my board from day 1
How sweet would that be!
by BishopWest on Apr 24, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never considered him
because he looks like the kind of guy who’s gonna be picked in the 25-40 range. I still think he will, but Gosselin’s is the closest to an NFL composite board you’re gonna see, and if Smith is down there, well, all the better, IMO.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the problem I have with Smith
as a safety is his run support. I don’t think he’s that tough, 214 lbs or not.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah.......he's got ultra long arms...3ft verticle...decent speed...not much power in the run support though(although he's aggressive and will the tackle)...but playing centerfield in the dime package sure looks enticing...
He’s the one FS prospect I’d take over Delmas……
Reminds me of a weaker, less physical FS- Sean Taylor… plays better with the play in front of him, as opposed to his back to the QB at outside CB………..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ballhawks
they want guys who can find the ball in the air and get to it.
I’ll remind everybody that the last year without Hamlin this defense gave up 15 TD passes in the month of December. THAT was the reason Dallas collapsed late that year.
If Hamlin ever went down and there was no replacement on this roster the TDs would rain down again.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...I am all for selecting Sean Smith, Alphonso Smith, DJ Moore, Jairus Byrd, Victor Harris, D McBath...etc....
I want a ball hawkin playmaker back there…..the guys listed being some of the better ones…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would die if we were ever able to obtain both of them.....I prefer Williams because of his weakside- speed/coverage/nickle contribution
I believe he’s the most coveted player on the Cowboys list, and they may even have to reach up at #69 to grab him…for which I wouldn’t mind at all…..they are BOTH going 3rd round…bet on it…
Brinkley is more defined for strongside-ILB (which we need depth at) but he’s not as cage like quick/ and reactive as you’d prefer as the primary weakside tackling machine…(although Brinkley can go outside LB as well to back up/ take over for Spencer/Ellis)
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
they like those guys
but they like McGee — a lot. If they’re 51/69 guys get picked clean early there’s a chance he goes 69. That surprises me, but if they trade up into the late 3rd, I’ve got a strong feeling it’s for him, not for the LBs.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ahh....I want a QB for sure...but I'm not sold on this late charging, wonderboy....but i'll take him....i guess..
I take a slidding Nate Davis over him anyday…..
alsointerests and talks of this QB-H-Back-FB-TE-LS-PR- James Casey too….
which is scaring me…..great athlete..but enough with the hybrid/slash/wildcat frenzy….If he had a sub 4.5 40…maybe…but 4.7+ makes him ordinary….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind looking at him -- Casey
but there’s no way I spend a pick in the first four rounds on the guy.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's expected to go in the top 75 picks.....great H-Back prospect with more intangibles than everyone else in this draft....
but we have enough weapons already in the backfield….Jerry’s thinking FB and Wildcat QB………………..but not considered a good blocker, nor do we use a pick on WiCa QB with Stanback available…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus he's alreadt 25......i'm not into the older prospects...
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the wildcat stuff is smoke
I read Jerry’s comments. The press goes after “wildcat” the way real cats go after catnip.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've heard from more than one place
that McGee and Pat White are 4/5 or 5/4 on a lot of QB boards.
As for Nate Davis I would never draft a player with a learning disability to play NFL QB.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"rumor has it"...
the guy obviously had the smarts to graduate high school, and qualify for college entrance, and remain eligible……..
until someone tells me what disability he has…I’ll continue to watch the film that had him as an early 2nd round prospect just 5 months ago………
He is the next Tony Romo……with a stronger arm…
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have published reports in my hand that say
“a documented learning disability.”
I don’t think the authors’ lawyers would let them print that unless it were true. Nobody likes to get sued.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i know all about it....which is why he slipped on my board as well...from top 60 down to about 150.,
I’ve seen too much game tape to know that will not hinder him…..he’s the perfect guy to sit on the bench for 4-5 years learning everything he needs to know……i would really like to know if he took a wonderlic………not all the players been published..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats laughable
Davis will never be anything close to Romo, Tony has an IQ of 130, Davis couldn’t spell cat if you gave hium the “c” and the “t”.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Romo
Positives: Walks on water….
Negatives: Can’t win in the post-season …
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
by OskieOskie on Apr 24, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Wow thats ridiculously rude bro.
To make fun of someone that has a disability is bush league and I think it’s uncalled for.
You don’t even know the guy, and you’re doing it in defense of another person you don’t even know.
That’s so damn classless.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 24, 2009 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
in fact, I swapped Williams in
it bothers me that he’s not part of any scenario.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 24, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are the safety prospects like for next year (2010)?
If it is strong class,maybe grab mid/late-round talent for this season to solidify our depth. If we lose Sensei to FA, we have our draft pick (with some experience under his belt) and better options in a deeper class. I’m sure there are aspects that I’m overlooking but, whatcha think?
by GalTex on Apr 24, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sensebaugh is a better player than Hamlin
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of people are saying "Well Sensebaugh is in a one year contract."
Well so what? Have you forgotten who our owner is? That means nothing.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you noticed the safeties brought in?
most of them are FSs. Delmas was brought in. McBath was brought in.
These are the two guys they like the best.
Tell it to Tom Ciskowski.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i am not questioning taking a FS (I'm against it being our first pick, as Sean Smith and Delmas are only marginally better than Johnson, McBath, V Harris, and S Martin) IF at ALL ?? ....I KNOW we need a DEEP coverage Safety, I also KNOW we NEED a SS...
there is a difference……..they also visited with or interviewed, and/or scouted Court Greene, Chip Vaughn, Will Moore, CJ Spillman, David Bruton, and Mike Hamlin……i really don’t care who made the visit to Valley Ranch….I am sure they used up their alloted 30 visits…
WE NEED BOTH……and I’d be shocked if we don’t take two Safeties….
I’m fine with drafting L Delmas or S Smith, and will be happy if one of those guys gets pick (although both will most likely be gone by #51, which I’ve contended all along)…They just wouldn’t be my first choice at #51……….
Draft anyone of these guys at #51, and I’ll be happy -—-
Conner Barwin-OLB/ILB
Clint Sintim-ILB
Larry English-OLB
Jarron Gilbert-DE
William Moore-SS
Pat Chung-SS
Sean Smith-FS/DB
Louis Delmas-FS
Al Smith-CB
DJ Moore-CB
Jairus Byrd-DB
Ziggy Hood-DE
OC/OG-Alex Mack
OC/OG-Max Unger
OC/OG-Eric Wood
OT-William Beatty
OT-Ebon Britton
OT-James Meredith
Percy Harvin-WR
Brian Robiskie-WR
IF ALL these players are gone…THEN….I would trade down….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is no difference
both safeties have the same responsibilities, cover and support the run, they have to be interchangeable.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
disagree...your saying any Safety over 6'0" and 200lbs is a liability in coverage....which is outrageous....that's all your saying...that's your stance..totally against the laws of attrition and sustainability..
i’ll take my chance with a guy over 200lb to hold up in the NFL, and actually be an effective run supporter…….while supplying more than adequate coverage support against TE’s and RB’s in underneath / intermediate zones……..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats not what I'm saying at all
I’m simply saying both of your safeties have to be able to cover and support the run equally well, what don’t you understand about that simple concept?
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
here we go again....
i know the game..very well…actually….i know the difference between what’s required from a Strong Safety, and a Free Safety…two different agendas, formulas, and strategies when coaching the positions, and while game planning…
.EVERY defensive back needs to be able to support the run, as well as cover…..CB,SS,FS…….some (CB’s-FS’s) arent physically equipped to endure constant in-fighting, block shedding, and impact plays, therefore are placed strategically, and historically “outside of the box” …15+ yards away from the ball…SS-, who are generally more powerful, bigger, tougher, stronger, are placed within the 15 yards(sometimes within the box), and repeatedly take on blocks/shed blocks/ forge towards the point of impact, while the front seven engage and blanket the play…(best described as a 5th LB with power, and agility to shadow interior receiving threats)…and are never placed out on an island unless there are 4WR+ sets…..which in turn should be substituted for a 2nd FS in a dime package……
not sure I can explain a concept any better………..either way I give up…..I know we need to draft two Safeties in this years draft, one that is more geared for deep/space coverage, and another more geared to encroach the line and attack the ball carrier/blitz/ and shoot gaps……….and sure as crap, they both surely won’t be 5’11" 193lbs saplings in the mold of Delmas and Johnson….
Now I’m pulling for Delmas to get drafted early on just so I can hear everyone bitch and whine….knowing all along he was rated top 40 for the most part….(overrated by my estimations) I hope he turns into a decent pro…but I’m not sold on him……
he will never be a Ed Reed type,……reminds me more of Chicago’s S-Mike Brown- (which ain’t a bad thing), but like Brown, he’s going to degenerate over time with the several violent impacts he’ll no doubt encounter in the NFL……..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it is the defensive scheme we should consider
when selecting for the safety position. Rather, we need to look at how our safety may be game planned. We want a strong saftety that is big enough to support the run, but not so sucktacular in coverage (Thong) that it completely undermines any run stopping ability. Strong safety is not going to be the best cover man on the team, and he isn’t supposed to be. He just needs to be able to be in position to make the qb think twice about throwing over the middle.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 24, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 Gun.....
fact is Roy was dumb, slow, took improper angles, and didn’t react or recognize well……simple as that…..not all 6’2" 215lbs guys are like that…..in fact….Moore, Bruton, and Vaughn are faster than Delmas and Johnson….and surely can cover within a 5 second cloud….in a middle zone/ or even if carried deep seam by a TE……I have no doubts those guys can do that…..this is the NFL….plays are over in 2-4 seconds..(especially with our pass rush) ….I have no doubt all of these “big, strong, fast SS” can cover an area within 20 or so yards off the line….these ain’t “Thong” wanna be’s…these are Woodson wanna be’s…..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is the jist of the argument,
and where everyone starts trotting out the wonderlic scores. Just how smart is the Safety we are getting. No doubt the Wonderlic is a tool, but I would be more interested in the “Football Savy” these guys have. The reason Palamalu and others look good is the fact they dedicate themselves to the sudy of the game. They look at enough film that they know what you are going to do before you know what you are going to do. That is the kind of kid I want. He doesn’t have to be the fastest or strongest he just needs to be smart enough to know his defieciencies and prepare to overcome them. I think if the Thong had had a “General” to put him in position he could have been just as effective as he ever was. He just wasn’t smart enough to do it on his own.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Apr 24, 2009 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's called football instincts
and Delmas’ is off the charts which why I highly covet him.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have more confidence in Sensebaugh than I do in any of our other safeties
so I would disagree with you and apparently our front office disagrees with you.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your easy to please.
Those are good possibilities for the most part Still have some dumbass issues with Harvin.
by oldboysfan on Apr 24, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see any reason for Dallas to say Harvin's off their board if he wasn't.
It’s not like its gonna fool every other team into letting him drop about 30 spots.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that why we got Sensabaugh?
Reaching for a S is almost as bad as reaching for a NT this draft.
by bleedinbluensilver on Apr 24, 2009 8:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we wouldn't be reaching
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where do I sign up for scenario 2?
Jerry Jones could go in his sock, slap you wit a stack of hundreds, then catch you again on the backswing wit 3 Super Bowl rings. So who the hell are you makin' fun of?
by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 23, 2009 11:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see two, but of the three here I think
scenario three is the most likely.
by Rafael Vela on Apr 24, 2009 12:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope not.
I love me some Jasper.
by Johnny Cage on Apr 24, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm okay with scenario 3 sans
the move-up to get McGee. I’d rather take a QB later and if we’re going to trade-up I hope it’s not for a QB development project. I would be fine with scenarios 1 and 2.
by Blammo on Apr 24, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like two but I'd be pretty happy to see Stephen McGee on the Cowboys roster
as a homer
by AustonianAggie on Apr 24, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why does everyone think this guy is good
he did nothing in college. he has the physicl measurements but where are the stats
by Becho on Apr 24, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
12th man
doesn’t need no stinking STATS!
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
by OskieOskie on Apr 24, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That first option miht actually be the best one
Unger plays every single position on the line and should project to a very good starting LG in the NFL.
McBath is probably the best cover safety in the draft, the only question is his ability to play the run as he played against alot of pass happy teams (including his own during practice).
Brinkley gives us a great ILB to groom under Brooking, although I’m not totally confident about his ability to play the pass.
Williams offers nice upside at the OLB
by boysinyabelly on Apr 24, 2009 12:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Surely, the 1st scenario would be solid.
Nobody could argue with that one.
by bleedinbluensilver on Apr 24, 2009 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd actually prefer Wood
over Unger if he was available.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way! Unger is awesome--he can play wherever he wants on the line, too.
Honestly, I don’t know much about Wood to compare the two, but I’ve watched enough of Unger to see he will make some team very happy.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 24, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think all three center prospects
have the versatility to play all the positions along the line. That being said, I like Unger, I just prefer Wood better. My top interior line prospects are Mack, Wood and Unger in that order but I’d be happy with any of them.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Terry here....same order..but I'd take any of the 3....Mack being ideal.....
Wood is more stout than Unger, and has a mean streak….needed for interior play….I’d like Unger at LG or RT……
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Mack and Wood are the best centers. Unger has the best versatility.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 24, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
2nd round
.If any of these 3 is available at 51 they may be the best option.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 24, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love the first option.
One of our greatest needs is a tough intelligent leader on the OL. Since there are 3 very good centers out there we may have a good chance for one to drop. I prefer Unger even if we have to move up a few picks as Raf suggest.
The other great need is a ball hawking safety. Can you imagine a guy even close to Ed Reed in our secondary and how that would make positive change to our defense? Can you say turnover?
If we could get one of these two it would be very good.
If we get both…..God have mercy on the rest of the NFL.
by cowboy1966 on Apr 24, 2009 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like three...
Not sure there’s any chance Delmas slips to 51… If the Cowboys want him, they’ll have to go get him…
by N41D on Apr 24, 2009 12:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you anticipate any moves in the 2nd?
2 more questions for you:
Brinkley twice-Is this the result of a good match between estimated spot he’s taken and spot the Cowboys are picking….or are you basing this off of impressions you’ve gotten from the Cowboys scouting interests?
How long do you think it would take for McBath to develop into a starting safety on this team?
by GhettoBear04 on Apr 24, 2009 12:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vela why isn't James Casey in one of the scenarios
Recently I have been reading we are all over him. There is a big chance we’ll select Casey in the second or third round this weekend.
Even though Jerry said we are probably going to sit tight at 51, If Connor Barwin falls into the second round, you would have to imagine that Jerry would make a play for him.
And I like the Vollmer pick.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 12:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
don't be surprised if we walk away from this draft without an NT
seems we like what we have in Siavii and I can’t remember us inviting any NT prospects in for private interviews. However, I think we’ll take a NT at some point, but I just wouldn’t be surprised if we didnt.
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the DT position this draft gets a D- grade
No sense wasting a pick
by bleedinbluensilver on Apr 24, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would actually like to burn one of our compensatory picks on Vaughn Martin
He is the most intriguing physical specimen out of all the NT’s in this draft, so it’s worth bringing him into camp to see if he got what it takes, and if he does it would pay huge dividends. If not we will only have wasted a late round pick
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 he would make the roster for sure....that dude is perfectly built to be a Wade NT...
will take time to groom though……but will be a player in this league….for sure…he will get drafted earlier than people think….possibly 4th round or sooner..
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt someone who plays football in Canada will get drafted that early
He is too raw
by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally I would take all 3
2 would be my 1st choice.
"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
by Wmillion on Apr 24, 2009 1:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
my first 4 picks
S – Delmas or Sean Smith (Delmas hopefully)
OT – Jamon Meridith
CB – Coye Francis or Victor Harris (Harris hopefully)
QB – Rhett Bomar over Mcgee if he is there
by Becho on Apr 24, 2009 2:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the 5th is where we will fill needs IMO
which is good because a few good LBs should be there. Perhaps we will get to pick from Phillips, Mckillop, Ellerbe, Joseph, Lee Robinson, and maybe even Brinkley.
by Becho on Apr 24, 2009 2:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
safety is /the/ need position?
i’m not so sure. kosier is good enough, but what if he’s breaking down? we need an OG who can play better than cory proctor. in fact, what happened last year is a good reason to believe that our OL depth is suspect
and i think the jury is out on our wide receiver corp. will rw be a real #1? if we have to have crayton as our #2, it doesn’t sound to me like the position is set. if, God forbid, neither position is certain, that would not be romo-friendly…
i think a punt returner and NT/ILB are real needs too.
by g8tgod on Apr 24, 2009 3:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get the love for Jasper Brinkley.
He’s essentially the same player as Bradie James.
We need an ILB that can cover.
by JBell523 on Apr 24, 2009 5:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Is that...
A super bad thing?
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 24, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know much about Brinkley, but if he is another James in coverage pass on him
Your right, we need a ILB that can cover. James just plain out sucks at covering..
by Boyzfan94 on Apr 24, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
who's Bradie James back up ???
although I agree he’s more of a strongside ILB like James….we have absolutely nobody behing James…and I’m sure Brinkley would also do just fine as a two down weakside ILB……..I think we need a thumper and a burner(nickle LB)….
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
2 ILB like you stated, a thumper and a burner.
April 25-26 -- NFL Draft
by APerfectStar on Apr 24, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The draft really is just a crap shoot…
At least one of these guys that everyone is raving about on here is bound to be a major bust. For all we know they might be drafting a hall of fame safety in the 7th round this year.
I hope they just take the best player available to them when it’s their turn to pick rather than just draft a safety because it’s a perceived area of need. I’m not sold on Delmas and certainly don’t expect him to produce right off the bat. I’m hoping for Scenario Three.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 7:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would
like to see us walk away with a safety, nt, wr, and an o lineman, whatever the order. A qb to develop would be nice too. It sure seems to me that saftey has been a point of weakness for a while so I hope they choose wisely there. Unfortunately, I stupidly planned a trip this weekend, so I will be begging, borrowing, and stealing to keep up with everything.
by cowboyz4ever on Apr 24, 2009 7:35 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like both of the McBath scenarios, except I don't think I would be too excited if they drafted McGee.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 24, 2009 8:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure, we need a third QB to develop.
I would rather take another position with our third pick, and grab a QB at least a round later. I’m all for bringing in 2 young QBs to develop after this draft and UFA signings are through.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 24, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like scenario 2 except
I’d obviously rather have McKillop than Brinkley.
The reason I like Delmas and McKillop so much is their football instincts to play their respective positions are simply off the charts.
If we just get one of these guys I’ll be thrilled.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Apr 24, 2009 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Scenario 3 would be perfect if McKillop was switched with McGee.
That would also give them the option of picking up a QB like Brandstater later.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 24, 2009 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think NT is a BIG need
I am not sure what happened to desire to supplement Jay Ratliff. He is not the prototypical 3-4 NT size & I think it was obvious last year that he wore down. I think a guy like Ron Brace may be available at 51. If we drafted him he could spell Ratliff or allow us to move him to D end.
by eightball on Apr 24, 2009 9:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm with eightball
but I don’t think Brace will be there at 51.
I wouldn’t mind somehting like
1. Unger
2. Sidbury
3. Jason Philips (my mom went to TCU, so this guy wins)
4. Best safety or quarterback available
by DoomsdayD75 on Apr 24, 2009 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen to Scenario 1
That has been my take from the beginning.
Res firma mitescere nescit
by Fighter15 on Apr 24, 2009 9:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll be happy If the Cowboys...
…take Brian Robiske at number 51, then Andy Levitre, OG, Oregon State at 69 (could be promising). Then I would hope to see them draft either Michael Hamlin, SS, Clemson or Chip Vaughn, SS, Wake Forest at 90.
Of course if by some miracle Duke Robinson falls to number 51 I’ll be doing back flips of joy.
0 = The number of Super Bowls the Eagles have won.
by gee-roj on Apr 24, 2009 9:15 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I was
with you until Robinson. Obviously Proctor was a disaster last year, but we still have Holland. I’d prefer someone a little more versatile, because I think we will need a backup center or tackle this year.
by DoomsdayD75 on Apr 24, 2009 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go with
the Surprise Option and shore up the OL with some young muscle with the first pick.
Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.
by OskieOskie on Apr 24, 2009 9:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't be mad at any of those scenarios
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 24, 2009 9:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For what it's worth, Gosselin's top 100 board
Rates as follows:
Delmas—35
Unger—37
Robiskie—46
Sidbury—67
I think those are the oly picks on his top 100. So he doesn’t have McBath rated very high.
Also, I was surprised DJ Moore wasn’t on his top 100 list either. I know he’s been falling, but I didn’t think he’d fall that far. He’d be a great pick-up in the3rd or 4th round. He lacks in the measurables, but was super productive and is very smart and tough. He can also return punts.
by Blammo on Apr 24, 2009 9:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You know what is funny?
Every SB Nation blog I’ve been to has at least two mock drafts that include Jasper Brinkley going to their team in the first 3 rounds. As a result, I’d suggest we start assuming that he won’t be where we want him to be.
Jasper won’t be a Cowboy unless Cisky and Jerry reach for him.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Apr 24, 2009 9:55 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
which is why we need to move up with our #104 to about 80-90 to get a shot at ILB-Brinkley, ILB-Jason Williams, LB-Scott McKillop, or ILB-Tyrone McKenzie
trading down at #69 is another option, get to the mid 3rd, and take one of the LB’s.,…absolute neccessity…unless they go with ILB-Marcus Freeman at #69….The best ILB’s will be found in round 3.
ILB is a MUST in the first 4 rounds !!!
by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if duke robinson is there at 51
Its a nooooo brainer….At pick 69 i take a strong look at sidsbury we need depth at linebacker and he would be a nice selection in the 3rd rd..However he is development type of player who needs to learn more than just the spin move to get to the qb but i like his upside..
by scandrick32 on Apr 24, 2009 10:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like
all the scenarios, I would be thrilled if any of those scenarios play out. that being said I would draft more OL like Unger that have versatility and more linebackers. here is a good question. If RW goes down with an injury how scary are the receivers to other teams?
by DCowboy on Apr 24, 2009 10:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
good point
Dallas will have to look hard at the wr position but I sure would not reach for one…If a wr who is rated high on there board does slip i would have no problem selecting one early…I am getting tired of tkaing shots on low round and free agent wr’s…
by scandrick32 on Apr 24, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
however....
One wr i want badly is dudley guice as everyone knows …I take him in the 5-6 rounds…love his upside
by scandrick32 on Apr 24, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love
scenario 3 …… but i’d be fine with any of them. Unger would be very nice
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by what_the_crap on Apr 24, 2009 10:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Our depth
on offense is quite good, we have a solid backup at QB, RB, TE but after that we could use some more depth on OL and WR, if any of the OL goes down or a WR I think we will struggle again like last year
by DCowboy on Apr 24, 2009 10:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Anybody know when Gosselin usually posts his third and final mock draft?
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
by Tim Wilson on Apr 24, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















