Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Cowboys Draft 2009: Get Up On Your Soap Box

We no longer have to count months. We no longer have to count weeks, or even days. Only hours my friends, only hours. I hope you are all as excited as I am. I was excited for the draft in November, I've got my dial turned all the way over to "crunk" now. Starting on Saturday, the Dallas Cowboys will welcome an infusion of new blood. With new young players comes new-found hope. Some of the names called over the weekend will become key contributors. Hopefully a few will become franchise cornerstones. This is where championship teams are built.

You’ve done your homework. You’ve devoured every draft publication you could get your hands on. You’ve scoured the internet for every mock draft and prospect evaluation. Now is your chance to get up on your soap box and campaign for your guy.

I want to know who you think the Cowboys should select with their first pick. Let’s try to keep this thing as uniform as possible. This is not the time for crazy scenarios, or a list of guys. I don’t want to see your whole draft board, just give me one name and your reasoning for why the Cowboys need your guy most.

For the sake of an example, I guess I will set this thing off.

With the 51st overall pick of the 2009 NFL Draft, the Dallas Cowboys should select…

Star-divide

Patrick Chung, S, Oregon.

There are plenty of reasons why I think Chung should be the Cowboys’ first pick. Firstly, I feel that safety is the Cowboys biggest need. Safety has been an area of need for the Cowboys since Darren Woodson retired, and we have seen in recent years how poor safety play can handcuff a defense. It is time to finally spend a first-day pick to plug the seemingly eternal hole at safety.

Secondly, I think that this year's talent pool at safety is much more shallow than the talent pool at defensive tackle, offensive line, linebacker, or wide receiver. There are three safeties who have pushed themselves ahead of the rest of the pack: Chung, Western Michigan’s Louis Delmas, and Utah’s Sean Smith.

Smith is best athlete of the group, but has more experience at corner. The Cowboys are high on Delmas, who may be the best player of the group, but his 12 bench press reps at the combine are a real red flag in my book. I am not as concerned with his upper body strength as I am with his work ethic. Delmas had to have known for at least a year that he would be showcasing his talents for NFL scouts in February. You have at least a year to prepare for the biggest job interview your life, and you don’t put in the work to put up a respectable number? You’ve got to do better than that.

Patrick Chung is not spectacular, but he is reliable. After watching seven years of Roy Williams, reliable sounds fantastic to me. Chung has the size, speed, recognition and coverage skills to play either safety position. If you are looking for Ed Reed, keep looking. Chung does not have the most impressive highlight tape, but you won’t often find him in chase position on anybody else’s highlights either. Patrick Chung is not as dynamic as Sean Smith, nor is he a bone-crusher like Missouri’s William Moore. Chung is however the most complete package at the safety position. That is why I think the Dallas Cowboys should take Chung with the 51st overall selection.

State your case for your guy (and slaughter me for suggesting Chung) below.

0 recs  |  Comment 82 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It's the night before Christmas

who’s sleepin?

Jerry Jones could go in his sock, slap you wit a stack of hundreds, then catch you again on the backswing wit 3 Super Bowl rings. So who the hell are you makin' fun of?

by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Apr 24, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... top 5 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Apr 25, 2009 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I know Stephen said they would put Jerry in a straight jacket, but in my scenario Jerry pulls a hudouni

and trades up to number 40 and selects Connor Barwin.

He is very reminiscent of Mike Vrabel, only more athletic. He is a shade under 6’4 and is 256 lbs. He runs his 40 somewhere in the 4.5’s; he has a 401/2 inch vertical; 10’08 broad jump; and a 6.87 three cone. Pretty amazing for someone of his size. Actually it’s pretty amazing for someone of any size to be exact.

I see him as a ILB on 1st and 2nd down, and as an edge rusher on 3rd downs. Plus he can also play TE, so Garrett can also use him in certain packages. He is very intriguing to say the least.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 24, 2009 11:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i don't like chung

i think they will take a WR. I’m thinking they will try to trade up for Nicks, if not, stay where they are and draft Barden.

Also, there is a good possibility Dallas thinks this draft sucks, as do i, and they will start trading some of their picks for next year’s picks (and i’m inclined to want that to happen)…

I use to love to hit, I use to take it serious. I only got one at bat a year, maybe...but, I took it serious. I hit 1.000 one year, if i had another at bat, I'd hit 2.000...

by Longhorn on Apr 24, 2009 11:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with all that, especially the Chung and WR thing.

I’m going Robiskie.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Barden Yet

I don’t think Barden will go Saturday. He’ll be early 4th at the latest.

Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 25, 2009 7:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

btw...I wouldn't be opposed to Chung, as we all know I covet a STRONG SAFETY....and that Pat Chung certainly is...

although if SS-William Moore was also available…I’d go with him over Chung……but Chung is the next best alternative…and he returns punts, and is a torpedo on special teams……(bonus)

i’m cool with..

25 reps at 225lbs…..that’s what I like from my Safety…..I love his tenacity and toughness, plays through the whistle….he’s not much of a ballhawk, or that great in coverage against speedy guys, but adequate against TE’s and RB’s in an underneath zone type coverage…thumbs up…

by My_2_Cents on Apr 24, 2009 11:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not a big fan of Chung being a Cowboy, but I see your points.

If you want a true SS in this draft, Chung is that—and playing that “rover” position at UO provided him some center-fielder experience.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd prolly be happier they wait until the 3rd, maybe even 4th to get a S.

A value WR, OL, or LB would be nice at 51.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ya im with 2 cents

No Saftey First round….. this can be done next year in the first…

I thank God everyday i wasnt born a Eagles fan!!!!!!

by regaberto on Apr 25, 2009 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Get Rashad johnson with #69, he'll still be there and fits our scheme and what we're looking for very well.

Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 25, 2009 7:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that guy looks pretty good in the 3rd.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But I’d like to get Centre or Guard at #51 unless Barwin is available.

by oldboysfan on Apr 25, 2009 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I'm saying

Why would you want to suffer through more Roy-esque safety play?
I wouldn’t mind an OL (Robinson, Unger or Wood) or LB being drafted (Sintim or Barwin) but I would like to see Sean Smith or Louis Delmas taken if they’re available.

by hiafex on Apr 25, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why the comparisons to RW?

I havent heard his coverage skills are putrid. Maybe a little trouble on WRs but not TEs or RBs. RW couldnt cover an O lineman if he went out for a pass

by fretman on Apr 25, 2009 5:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want Chung or Delmas....

I’’d say the heck with it and Draft Lawrence Sidbury Jr. at 51, Then get McBath in the 3rd. That’s just me. I want us to turn up the heat on all quarterbacks, and I want a coverage safety, not a SS with the 51st pick. We can get good SS later in the draft if we want. but the best coverage safety for our scheme would be McBath. I hope and pray we do not pick Chung or Delmas. We need to build this team, so we have to make every pick count.

"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by DallasPalace on Apr 25, 2009 12:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd like Sidbury

It’s myopic to keep focusing on the OLB Pass rushers but Sidbury has a good chance of being very good at it due to his speed

by AustonianAggie on Apr 25, 2009 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

here my thing....

here ye here ye, Smitty is breaking his self-imposed silence since we got our asses handed to us in a most gruesome fashion in Philadelphia. I’ve kept an open mind, and tried to neither be too high nor low, and just focus on what we can get for what we actually have….

Points to consider
1. No way we use 11 picks, the hit against the cap for cut rookies makes keeping 11 highly unlikely

2. This is a weak draft, only about a dozen or 15 real impact players

3. We don’t need 1st Round money to worry about

4. Next years Draft will be huge for a variety of reasons
    a.deep talent rich draft class
    b. no cap

The thing to do is play it safe in this draft. that’s not the sexy answer, it will make no one happy that thinks were gonna find the next Darren Woodson or Cliff Harris in this draft.

This means there is almost no way to screw this up, we can go a lot of different directions. My gut says go for a NT, Ron Brace; he’s someone that can split time with Ratliff and learn his craft at this level from someone that is great himself. I believe there are plenty of opportunities to get a quality safety pick by packaging some lower picks to either move up to get Delmas (if the opportunity arises), or into next year’s draft. If we take 6 or seven rookies to camp we can possibly keep them all.

I think banking on finding the perfect safety in this draft will lead to disappointment. Anyhow that’s my two cents. We can use almost anything, I also like that James Casey, he’s versatile…

by SmittyCityMo on Apr 25, 2009 12:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

??

I don’t care who they take first as long as they get some some ol guys or we’re screwed…we have no depth at offensive line.

by Silver-star on Apr 25, 2009 12:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I really like Chung too...

Nice pick Carl. I think he’s the best all round Safety in the draft and would be happy with the pick. There’s plenty of people who don’t like him and you’ll probably get plenty of complaints but I’ve been sold on this guy for several weeks. Good value, great need = Right Pick.

by Luke. on Apr 25, 2009 12:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Chung is a Chump

So I would say I am happy with anyone but him, just my opinio,n and it has nothing to do with Lynch, but just to drive m point home it looks like he has some roy willimas in him with a close horse collar……….

by rioplayer7 on Apr 25, 2009 1:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's just one play and it's not even that bad.

Chung is regarded by almost everyone as an excellent tackler and a good last line of defense.

Chung is nothing like Roy.

Roy = Lazy, out of shape, out of position, bad angles, doesn’t study film hard, sloppy tackling technique, hasn’t hit hard in years, slow to read and react, getting old and injured, can’t find a single team that wants him.

Chung = Hard worker, team leader, calls the plays for defense, good open field tackler, can lay big hits on RB’s and crossing WR’s, committed in film and weight room, instinctive, read and reacts quickly, durable consistent performer who’s started 51 straight games, 21 year old senior will be amongst the first 60 players selected in the entire Draft.

Chung is nothing like the player Roy Williams is now.

by Luke. on Apr 25, 2009 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But just like the young roy williams

Cant cover worth anything and thats what we need

by rioplayer7 on Apr 25, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not true.

If he were as bad as Roy in coverage he would not be so highly ranked.

by Luke. on Apr 25, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brace yourselves...

I’d like to see them select… Ron Brace. I’m sure you’ve seen my other posts about how important I think NT is compared to the other positions so… that’s my pick!

God 1st, Family Always & Dallas Cowboys 4 Life!!!!!

by CodeNamedG on Apr 25, 2009 3:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

don`t think Brace is on the Boy`s radar

they`ve been kicking the tires on quite a few NT`s so they might look at one later in the draft. Miller, Roy (DT), Texas or Scott, Dorell (DT), Clemson would be their first choices but depending how sold they are on Junior Saliva or however you spell it they might wait until near end of the draft and take Harris, Ra’Shon (DT), Oregon

by ziggy19 on Apr 25, 2009 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol junior saliva!

Don't believe everything you think.

Your causes are cute!!!

by stoproyce on Apr 25, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

W. Moore should be in the running

The kid was a surefire first-rounder a year ago. One bad year, hampered by injuries, and he’s dropped significantly. This is a steal waiting to happen.

Everything's looking up, Milhouse!

by accidental innuendo on Apr 25, 2009 5:16 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

His 2008 does look ordinary.

But prior to that, he was a playmaker

Highlights from 2007

Everything's looking up, Milhouse!

by accidental innuendo on Apr 25, 2009 5:23 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, 30 comments in and...

I see only one mention of O lineman with our 1st pick. Unless of course, we all like having Proctor and Holland as our only depth. Now I am warming up to Chung. But if Unger is there for us, that would be the pick. He plays all line positions for cryin out loud. Looks like great value to me.

by fretman on Apr 25, 2009 6:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the O -line will get some attention

The Cowboys would like to land Vollmer, Sebastian (OT), Houston but push will come to shove and they will select McGee, Stephen (QB), Texas A&M and pray that Vollmer slides. Other than that there`s great depth for the O-line later in the draft. Allen, Roger (OG), Missouri Western draws comparison to Larry Allen…might be too hard for Jerry to pass on.

by ziggy19 on Apr 25, 2009 6:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's the cap danger of drafting, say 4 OL late (5+)... and only finding 1 we like?

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... top 5 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Apr 25, 2009 7:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

same danger as before

just 4 blown draft picks and contracts; the cap hit will be approximately the same no matter the position

And what do these 5th round picks cost on the balance sheet? even as dead money, they’re still only 20% the cost of veterans

by AustonianAggie on Apr 25, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can`t resist

The Cowboys want a safety, they love Delmas and will trade with the Patriots for the 34 pick giving up a later rd pick and next yr`s 1rst rd`er

at Safety I like McBath, Darcel (FS), Texas Tech or Martin, Sherrod (CB), Troy and the Boys like them as well but they love Delmas so if he`s still on the board at 34 watch for that move.

The Cowboys want a wr, they are showing strong interst in Williams, Derrick (WR), Penn State as well as Massaquoi, Mohamed (WR), Georgia , Iglesias, Juaquin (WR), Oklahoma and Robiskie, Brian (WR), Ohio State at 51 Robiski should be gone so the pick I think will be Derrick Williams.

by ziggy19 on Apr 25, 2009 6:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

very much doubt we trade next year's first

Red and Black!! Red and Black!! Red and Black!! Congrats boys first time in team history over .500

by aussie_cowboy on Apr 25, 2009 6:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like this guess...

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... top 5 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Apr 25, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Best available

with intelligence, attitude and work ethic has to be the main goal for the 51st pick. This pick has to start this year or next year. They don’t have to be the best player on the team but Jerry really needs another 2-3 starters from this draft. Since our greatest need is OL, safety and maybe LB players drafted in those spots have the best opportunity to start.

I would like to see our current group of receivers have a shot in this offense. If no one steps up it could be a long year for the passing game. Assuming we don’t draft a receiver at 51 or 69 we won’t know the answer to this question until we get a few weeks into the season.

I have been really pleased with the way Jerry has managed the draft and very excited to see whom we end up with.

So many players and so few picks!

by cowboy1966 on Apr 25, 2009 7:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade up for Robiskie

or some other receiver that falls from the first round into our laps @ #51. Get safety Rashad Johnson next

Tony Romo off in dat hole, Watch roll and watch him throw, Watch him lead dem cowboys to the super bowl, now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys, Now watch me "yua!" crank dat cowboys!

by ProBowlFactory on Apr 25, 2009 7:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's the scenario I'd be happy with.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My bet = None of the above...

I’m guessing the Cowboys pull a surprise and we’re all wrong!

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... top 5 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Apr 25, 2009 7:15 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t be upset if Chung was the pick but based upon the information I have I think that if Robiskie or Delmas are there they will be the pick. And I’d he happy with either. My nightmare (which I have a sneaking suspicion might happen) is us taking James Casey, the tight end out of Rice with the 51st pick if Robiskie and Delmas are both gone.

by Beuerleincouldhavebeenbetterthentroy on Apr 25, 2009 7:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Please not another draft TE surprise

I understand Caey is exceptional and versatile, but I don’t want to see that pick either.

by Blammo on Apr 25, 2009 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Casey

would be a jack of all trades, run the wildcat, pass, fb block, slot receiver. For the wildcat I`d prefer White, Pat (QB), West Virginia and for a blocking te we could pick up Phillips, John (TE), Virginia

by ziggy19 on Apr 25, 2009 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only thinkg I worry about Casey is his speed

for what we want him to be in our offense, his speed kind of worries me.

by quincyyyyy on Apr 25, 2009 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Key To Average Draft and No Number One

Is to find position where we can select one of the top players. So, for example, if we go center, we can snag one of the very top players at this critical position. This fixes our line depth problems immediately and then we can begin to focus on replacing our left tackle. I would figure out a way to trade with the Titans in round one and select Mack. I would use future draft picks as bait, maybe Carpenter, and jump ahead of the Steelers.

by Iowacowboy on Apr 25, 2009 8:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

A center would be a great choice.

Trading up for a center is a good idea.
What time is the 1st pick today?

by cowboy1966 on Apr 25, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Levitre realistically

if there at 51. We don’t need him to come in and star immediately but he could push for starting LG or back up just about every other O-line position this year and then slot him in his best position his 2nd year.

This is assuming Delmas is gone and the WR run they had in the 2nd last year repeats this year and the WRs are gone. Best available O-lineman in the 2nd, best available safety in the 3rd and best available with the other 9.

1. Delmas
2. Robiskie
3. Levitre

by cow_fanatic on Apr 25, 2009 8:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm torn

I know Safety is a huge need, as is O-Line depth, but I gotta say … I’m hoping it’s Robiskie at #51.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by what_the_crap on Apr 25, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

anyone have a decent guess as to how long it will take for the Boys to be on the clock?

From previous years, obviously not every team uses their time. They’ll do a little song and dance for the first pick, the second is likely already a given… etc… many teams know how they will move based on various top 15 scenarios.

Bottom line – what is the over/under on when the Cowboys are on the clock?

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... top 5 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Apr 25, 2009 8:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

DallasCowboys.com is Guessing

A little after 8pm Central Time. Like you said, it depends on how many teams pick early on the clock and how many trades they make.

by kindablue on Apr 25, 2009 8:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, certainly lots of opinions

The Cowboys have given the indication they’d be willing to part with veterens to find rookies who can contribute, so we could see a veteren, likely with a big contract, traded today or tomorrow. The point would be more to unload salary than move up. But a point will come when they DO want to move up to get someone, and look for a verteren to be gone at that point. As for the pick, I don’t know who, but I’m guessing OT. Maybe Jamon Meredith.

"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
--Bruce Coslet

by SB Six on Apr 25, 2009 8:51 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

throw the combine garbage out the window

Delmas is a player, I don’t care how many times he benches 225, absolutely irrelevant, the kid can play and and at a high level and thats all that matters.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 25, 2009 9:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why do they have the combine

every year if the data is of no use? Do you just ignore combine garbage on players you’re convinced are good or do you never consider combine results?

by cow_fanatic on Apr 25, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

combine should only be used

if you have 2 players rated the same off of tape, then use the measureables to break the tie.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Apr 25, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I usually enjoy guessing

But I think the fact that they don’t pick until 51 is maddening to try and guess. I agree with many that it will be Safety or O Line. I really don’t think WR should be a priority high in the draft.

What I read on Chung reminded me of thong so I’m not thrilled about that pick. I’d rather see get Pegues or McBath at safety. Then go for Oline in the 3rd.

by staubachfan on Apr 25, 2009 9:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ron Brace

We only have 1 NT, unless you count Junior Saliavi (he seems like a practice squad guy to me though). Brace is the 2nd best nose tackle prospect in this class, and it is a position of need.

Robiskie is the only receiver (unless Harvin magically falls) that I’d be interested in with our first pick.

by DoomsdayD75 on Apr 25, 2009 9:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

With the 51st pick..

I’d like the Cowboys to select Phil Loadholt, if he’s there. We’ve missed too many times over the years with o-line picks, and paid for it dearly by being forced to sign higher priced free agents. He’s projected as a right tackle, and while some would say left tackle is our greater need — and I would agree with that — the bottom line is we need to draft good young players on the line.

Loadholt fits that bill, and may even bring some versatility (tackle or guard?).

That’s my pick, since that’s the point of the post. With that being said, I hope we take the best player available.

by Johnny Cage on Apr 25, 2009 9:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think he might be a good right tackle.

But that to me might be the least concerning part of the line.

I’m not sure if he could translate real well into guard.

Now if he’s in the third or fourth, have at it.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 25, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Loadholt=cool football name. Mayock just said he may go in the bottom of the 1st.

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way

I’d be shocked.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 25, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Cowboys will have a very quite first day.

They’ll take either Delmas, Chung or Moore. I’m betting on Chung.

The second day will be a trade frenzy.

by Luke. on Apr 25, 2009 10:02 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Congratulations

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Apr 25, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sweet!

Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!

by Aaron Novinger on Apr 25, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I say....Jarius Byrd CB/Safety

Last year we had A. Henry play a sort of Star role, this time around we get a younger, faster and more ballhawking version of him to play it. He will play FS and some corner w/ Hamlin moving over to the SS position

by nicholas.rodriguez on Apr 25, 2009 1:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Way to take that sack Romo!
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets From The Land Of Sunshine
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why The Eagles Game Is Not About Romo
Small
Cowboy / Eagle game analysis - using Drives instead of pure stats
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 9 - Final Edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stats Only I May Find Interesting
Small
FOX coverage from Afghanistan
Bitty-p_small
The new media-darlings?
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Dallas’ "Knockout" Player
Porkchop_small
Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down -- First Half of the 2009 Season
Sb_xliv_ring_small
Humble Pie is Yummy!
Ept_sports_nfl_experts-348355349-1231708620_small
Good game..
Dirkn_270_060605_small
Anthony Spencer Won This Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher