Will the REAL Tony Romo Please Stand Up?
Funny how this QB thing works. If you've got a great one, your team is generally going to see success on offense, put people in the seats and give fans a kind of undying hope that teams with lesser QB's just cant muster up.
At one point early on, I thought Dallas had found Troy (great QB) Aikman's heir apparent. Now I'm not so sure. There are a myriad of ways to look at this, both positive and negative, so let's play around a bit;
Romo - The good, the bad and the ugly...
Romo possesses the tremendous natural playmaking ability in that he can elude pressure, buy time and find receivers anywhere on the field. He has, at times shown superior accuracy, putting the ball squarely in the hands of receivers regardless of the amount of zip, arc, touch or lead that was needed to complete the pass. And one more point that should be made, He HAS indeed shown the ability to lead his team on the field and be the guy everyone rallies around. Will anyone forget the Bills game as long as they live? Did he not do everything in his power to put them in position to win the Seahawk playoff game despite Tuna's stubborness around offensive play calling? That's all good..very, very good.
Romo also has shown a penchant for doing too much and putting the team in positions of weakness. Rather than check down to an open back, he often tries to take what isn't there. He's shown a lack of mental toughness at times and allowed broken protections to play right into opposing defensive coordinators' hands by turning the ball over in critical situations. His demonstrated inability to protect the football under duress has become so much of a weakness that opposing defenses will leave receivers wide open in favor of getting pressure on Romo and forcing costly mistakes. Bad, just bad.
Then there is the public personna of Romo. The star-studded nightlife with an entourage of hangers-on, the questions about his work ethic and leadership, the locker room madness with Witten and a certain Bills WR and the blonde bombshell girlfriend who makes more headlines for for how she tips the scales than Herman Johnson of LSU.
Just for fun: Step away from the buffet line with your hands where I can see them!
Romo has become a big, big star, without having won anything of consequence. That is, by definition, the Ugly.
Romo by the numbers
It's hard to get a bead on Tony Romo just using stats (I hate it when people use stats to try and tell me who the better players are when they know it's only part of the story). 65.3, 64.4 and 61.3; those are his completion percentages over the last 3 years. 8.6, 8.1 and 7.7 show his declining yards per attempt. 9, 10, 13 shows an alarming trend around the number of fumbles per year.
I'm not sure what this tells us other than the fact that some of his stats are schizophrenic. It might make more sense to compare some of his stats with some of the rushing stats (I'll leave that to someone like BishopWest or someone from BTB to tackle). Either way, he's not showing franchise QB-like improvement from a statistical standpoint.
The case for 2009 as Romo's defining moment
It's a Romo-friendly offense and locker room. He headlines an offensive roster chock full of skill players who have proven that they can win the battles on the field. Let's be real here...trouble left Romo the day Dick Jauron said "yeah, I think he could help us". The running game is set for a breakout performance and should take the pressure off. It's his fourth year in this offense and he and Garrett should now be in lockstep.
He's heard the criticism. He knows he hasn't generated a single playoff win, despite all of the hype and the hope. He knows that the team doesn't need him to get them into the playoffs by throwing 40 TD's, but rather lead them there by limiting mistakes, and elevating the team's overall play through displays of mental toughness. If he cannot do these things, it's likely Dallas will renew it's search for the next great Cowboys QB.
And so...
Now is the time for Tony Romo...the REAL Tony Romo, to stand up and show all of the football world who he is. All of the excuses have run out. He's young by football experience standards but not so by his age (he'll be 29 this month). Is he an over-hyped kid from Wisconsin that has fallen into the trap of believing his own press clippings or is he the one to lead Dallas back to its rightful place on the NFL throne? Is he Anna Kournikova or Maria Sharapova? Is he Bradshaw or Brad Pitt?
I believe he is, indeed, going to take that next step and become the QB we all desperately want him to be. I think he is going to decrease his turnovers. I think he will mature and make better off-field decisions to lay low. I think he will absolutely learn that the best plays are sometimes the bad plays you made sure never occur. I think he will rally this team to the single unifying cause of winning and get them to the promised land. I believe...but I am nonetheless anxious and concerned.
Whatever happens, 2009 promises to be a memorable year.
GO COWBOYS!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
143 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very good points, but i do think alot of those stats fall on the shoulders of Garrett.
He has got to do a better job of getting Tony into a rhythm, those 3 and outs last year were annoying and I put most of the blame on Garrett for that, usually it took Tony until that 1st drive of the 2nd half to get into any sort of rhythm.
We have got to utilize the running game early, play-calling is important, if your not forcing the ball to TO every other play Tony is much better at taking what the D gives him…Remember when he came in for Bledsoe?
We saw lots more roll outs and throws on the run, he was just looking to take what the defense gave him, if we committ to the run and play-action at the right time things open up deep…I fully agree this is put up or shut up though, regardless of what happens I know we have a very good QB, and a franchise QB, maybe he won’t ever win a super bowl but alot of QB’s didn’t, I’m happy with Romo and think he gives us a great shot at a Super Bowl for another 3 years, hopefully we start the process of grooming someone for 2-3 years and see what we have.
Great Post 5Blings...
I agree with your assessment.
With Romo there is the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Those who like him, brag on the Good Romo. Those who don’t, complain about the Bad, Ugly Romo. He is like Jekyll and Hyde.
I, for one, believe that the Good Romo outweighs the Bad Romo. I would only trade him on an even swap for very few QBs in the league today. Currently, he gives us our best opportunity to win.
I do predict that IF the Cowboys do NOT make the Playoffs this year, and if the reason for that points directly to Romo’s INTs and Fumbles, JJ will be looking hard for a QB without the RISK FACTOR of the Bad Romo. I hope it never comes to that.
Some QBs can win even without a great defense (Ken Stabler won Super Bowl XI with the 18th ranked defense.) I’ve yet to see Romo consistantly raise the level of play for the whole team. Some argue that Romo is still young in football experience and can adapt and change. I hope so. If not, 10 years from now we’ll be talking about how we ALMOST had a great team during the Romo years.
Bishop...
Can you look at Romo’s stats in different ways (i.e. with and without Felix, with and without Barber, with and without Kosier, when the defense held/didn’t hold teams to a certain # of rushing or passing yards, etc.) over the last 3 years?
I’d like to know if there have been any true keys to Romo’s good and bad performances.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
there is no question Romo has put up
franchise qb type of numbers over his career so far, to say otherwise is simply nonsense.
Romo is who he is which is a gunslinging qb capable of creating magic but also turning it over. As I stated after the season, Romo is like a wild mustang who needs to be reined in at times, which means Garrett needs to constantly coach Romo throughout each game, otherwise, too much of that wild side will come out.
That being said, there isn’t a qb on the planet I’d rather have lead this team, he’s truly a special player and we’re extremely to have him. I know in time he’ll improve and lead us to multiple championships before he hangs up the cleats.
Romo IS the next great Cowboys qb, no question in my mind.
In Romo we Trust
If you think about it...
His performance in 2007 was outstanding, but the offense was firing on all cylinders and T.O. had a banner year.
What do you think the loss of T.O. will mean to Romo’s performance on the field?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I should hope that no matter who is on the field, that Romo will progress.
He seems to have great potential in his vision on deep passes and over the middle shots, but I would like his sideline accuracy to either improve, or for Garrett to limit those high risk routes.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed.
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 5, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions
that it will improve
since he can now go back to going through his progessions instead of trying to appease T.O.
In Romo we Trust
but he can't sing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrINA2iLD8M
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Nice "yay" and "nay" balance, Blings.
Gosh, I barely remember the last time I read serious debating over who this team’s franchise QB could be. Hopefully, developing a guy like Romo will inspire management to continue the trend towards finding young guns with potential. I don’t ever want to go through a QB dry spell again!
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed.
I certainly think Romo's better than several "elite" QBs
Big Ben, Eli, McNaab, Cutler, Warner, etc. I also think he needs to improve to take the team where we want them to be.
It remains to be seen whether or not he’s great, but I’d still take him over most of the QBs the media and a vast majority of NFL fan seem to faun over.
Epic Fail since 1985
Interesting
The first two are what I would call “winners”. They’ve got 3 rings, and are 3 for 3 in the big game, between them in a very short time. But I think both of them were propelled by their respective defenses and really played mistake-free football. Neither of those guys will ever lead the league in yards or TD’s.
The last three are gunslingers; collectively they are 1 for 4 in Super bowls and while they are good QB’s, McNaab hasn’t ever been able to get over the hump, Cutler is under the microscope now (on a team that lacks good skill players) and Warner, despite coming off of a tremendous year with gaudy numbers, will be known more for the pass to James Harrison unless he can get them back up and over.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Romo vs the other guys
From your list, I would trade Romo straight up right now for Roethlisberger, Eli and Cutler. I would not trade him for McNabb or Warner because those two guys are significantly older. However, I do think that both McNabb and Warner would give the Cowboys a better chance of getting to the Super Bowl in 2009 than Romo does.
Romo’s style of play, coupled with his statistical and leadership regression leads to my opinion that he wil be the same QB in 2009 (or worse if trends continue) that he has been the last year and a half or so. Given that, I’d say the odds of Dallas’ on-field performance improving significantly is remote.
The key to Romo is to draft him as you Fantasy Quarterback and then around week nine or ten trade him to some unsuspecting owner who doesn’t know about his annual late season implosions.
by Cowboy Louie on Apr 6, 2009 6:29 AM CDT up reply actions
that doesn't make sense
since Romo put up better numbers than Aikman and Staubach rarely produced. To say the odds of the Cowboys on field performance imroving are remote is simply not true at all.
If it wasn’t for Romo, the Cowboys would have been lucky to win 4 games last season and the same holds true for 2009.
In Romo we Trust
The same holds true for any team with a quality qb
Red and Black!! Red and Black!! Red and Black!! Congrats boys first time in team history over .500
by aussie_cowboy on Apr 7, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Hard to argue with the data suppporting your argument...
since he has faded down the stretch, but let me ask you (and anyone else reading this) this;
WHAT DOES ROMO NEEED TO DO IN 2009 TO MAKE YOU A BELIEVER?
I put some stats in the original post…is it improvement there?
Is it winning a playoff game(s)?
Another Pro Bowl berth?
What?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
when has the defense ever bailed him out??
If the defense doesn’t turn into a sieve on the last two defensive plays of the Ravens game, we win that crucial December game.
And wasn’t the Giants game just as crucial? We won that game.
In Romo we Trust
+1
The Giants game was huge.
But the more I watch highlights of the Steeler game, the more I am convinced that Romo’s play is one of the principal reasons we lost.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
BUT...
the defense HAS bailed him out. The Steeler game was a great example of how his early turnovers did not turn into touchdowns.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
the defense didn't bail him out in that game
actually in the 4th qtr when he needed the defense the most, they gave up the tying TD. Through 3 qtrs they were great, no so much in the 4th.
In Romo we Trust
You are not being fair
What about the turnovers early that could have buried Dallas and made the 4th quarter a non-issue?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
but they didn't so its a moot point
and the first INT is clearly on T.O. for quitting on his route.
In Romo we Trust
Again
They didn’t because the DEFENSE bailed Romo out.
I’m not a Romo apologist, so I can’t give him the credit you give him for the Giants game and not chastise him for his poor play against Pittsburgh. Obviously, that is where we diverge.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I admit he lost the Steelers game
however, all I’m saying is the defense didn’t play flawlessly either, they certainly let up in the 4th when they were needed the most.
In Romo we Trust
Flawlessly...
I never expect anything to be flawless.
The defense played beyond their expectations. That’s all I can say.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
That Santonio burning Newman thing killed what the D had been doing all day.
I think that was the game that I finally accepted Bradie James as Ken Norton, Jr.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions
Newman
made some crappy plays during the season.
I frankly think Scandrick outplayed him!
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Newman is a Stud!
And allthough i like Scandrick he was covering slot WR’s and Newman was covering the #1’s. I dont think its fair to label him at being outplayed.
Make me a believer
I believe in Romo’s talent – I just don’t believe his style of play translates into a team that has a good chance of going to the Super Bowl. I believe stats are overrated when judging quarterbacks, so I cannot point to any one stat that would make me a believer. I also think Pro Bowl berths are complete nonsense, though if he was named first team All-Pro that would certainly be huge.
Anyway, for Romo to make me a believer in 2009, he will have to do the following:
First, significantly restrain his gunslinging style of play. Not toning his game down just a bit, but changing the way he plays. Taking chances all over the field and being careless with the football certainly lead to good ESPN highlights and fantasy numbers, but they are the trademarks of a quarterback who doesn’t understand what it takes to win in the NFL.
Second, he must become the Leader of this football team. Right now, by all accounts he is just another guy. I’m a big believer that Leadership emanates from the quarterback position. To this point Romo has shown me immense talent but very little in the way of intangibles.
Third, Romo must improve his game in December and January, not regress.
Finally, he must lead the Dallas Cowboys to the NFC title game or beyond.
If Tony Romo accomplishes those four points then you bet I’ll be a believer, and I’ll be damn happy to be back on the Romo bandwagon.
by Cowboy Louie on Apr 6, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
explain to me how getting to the NFC championship
should be all put on Romo’s shoulders, as I thought the game of football was a team game and required offense, defense and special teams.
Romo could accomplish your first three objectives, and the Cowboys could still still fail to reach the NFC championship game if the defense and special teams don’t improve or regress.
In Romo we Trust
Say more about your second point...
I dont quite understand. How would fans know if he emerged as the true leader? How would that manifest itself on or off the field?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
It has to be a playoff game. Not just for me but for all fans.
I think that’s pretty simple. The only reason Steeler fans aren’t having this conversation about Big Ben is because he’s had post season success. His bad plays and turnovers are forgotten because of that. Look at Romo’s stats over the last 2 years. There aren’t many QB’s that have put up as good numbers as he has but it doesn’t mean much to Cowboy fans because those stats haven’t equaled post-season success. Whereas Ben hasn’t put up the numbers Romo has and yet has won in the post-season so his numbers, his turnovers, are forgotten. And well they should be. So Romo can’t just hope to have a great statistical season again and not bring home any W’s from the playoffs because I don’ t think most Cowboy fans are that patient or reasonable.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
explain to me how one player is 100% responsible
for playoff success because I have yet to witness a team having success in the playoffs on great qb play alone.
It takes all three phases of the game, not just one. Roethlisberger is lucky to play on a great defensive team, whereas Romo doesn’t have that luxury.
In Romo we Trust
Would it be fair to say that poor QB play could be the reason for playoff failures?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
absolutely not
Romo certainly did not play poor in the two playoff games in 2006 and 2007. In Seattle, Parcells toned down the gameplan, yet Romo had a very solid, effecient game with no INTs. The famous muffed snap was as a holder, not as a qb.
Against the GMen, his only INT was on the last play of the game from a desperation throw with seconds left. I thought his play otherwise was very solid considering he was running for his life the entire second half.
No way was Romo’s play the reason for those two losses.
In Romo we Trust
I actually agree
I never put that loss in Seattle as Romo as a QB. He played pretty well, given the fact that he wasn’t really given that many opportunities to make plays.
They were both team losses. He could have played better but it wasn’t because of bad QB play that they lost those games.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
Sorry...I was unlcear
I meant that in a hypothetical context.
Overall, can a QB’s poor play be the single reason a team fails in the playoffs (or in any game, for that matter)?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
it certainly can be a big reason
if the qb throws multiple INTs and plays bad, sure, like in the Panthers/Cards playoff game, Delhomme stunk it up and obviously contributed to that loss.
However, I don’t care how well a qb plays, he needs his team to play well also and all you have to do is look at Manning and the Colts to see that.
In Romo we Trust
You refuse to buy into the idea that
…a player can carry his team to victory. I get it.
I just don’t see why you refuse to acknowledge that players do elevate their teams and can be THE reason they win.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
How many qbs have consistently carried their team to playoff victories?
The list is very short.
Brady
Roethlisberger
Warner
McNabb did early in the 2000s, but he is nowhere close to that type of qb at this point.
Eli has yet to prove anything to me. You can’t seriously tell me he played well against us, when all he did was take advantage of jacque reeves early and pretty much give us every opportunity to win the game in the fourth quarter.
Romo has neither carried this team or been the main cause of their losses. He sure as heck played well enough in the giants game for us to win.
Why only playoff victories?
Why not step back and look at it more broadly?
I saw Emmitt carry Dallas at times. I saw Manning do it last year. I’ve seen Adrian Peterson do it (watch his game against San diego and you’ll see that through his play, he elevated the entire team). There are tons of examples.
I’ve also seen players single handedly lose games for their teams through crappy play. Jacques Reeves comes to mind.
It happens.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Well if you want to go into regular season victories
I think Romo’s carried this team in quite a few of them.
Terry disagrees.
I, however, agree.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
really?
Emmitt didn’t need his OL? AP didn’t need his?? Manning didn’t need his OL or WRs?
C’mon, get real, indivdual players can’t carry teams like in other sports, it just can’t be done.
In Romo we Trust
Safe to say...
your mind cannot be changed even in the face of the truth.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
So is Basketball
…where you said a player COULD carry a team.
Again, I’m not sure you know what your point is beyond the Romo apologism.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
You're completely right...
Playoff wins make you forget about stupid mistakes.
It doesn’t matter if Romo threw for 700 yards and 8 tds in a playoff game, if he had one turnover and they lost, it’d be on his shoulders.
Fair or not, its just how things are judged in Dallas.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
Maybe...
but I am not sure if that is a bad thing or not?
Would you rather be a Cincy fan and continually have little or no expectations for your team? Eagles fans must get ulcers thinking about what they HAVE NOT won.
I remember what it was like rooting for Dallas before Landry left. It was awful. The talent wasn’t there. The mismanagement of the game was readily apparent.
Yankees fans are spoiled, but rightfully so. Think they would trade places with Rangers fans?
No…I am okay with the overly high expectations on our team. It keeps us sharp. It forces a level of accountability onto Jerry and Stephen and Wade and Jason and Tony that I like.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
It's not a bad thing.
It’s just how it is.
I like it too. It’s what makes being the QB for the Dallas Cowboys more prestigious than being the QB for the Tampa Bay Bucs or Kansas City Chiefs.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
Agree with you on Roethlisberger and thats it
Plax has helped eli out just as much as TO did Romo. And Eli has a run game Romo could only dream about. Romo played about as well as Eli in that playoff game – if his receivers catch every freakin pass like eli’s did, we win.
Cutler is everythign we hate about Romo. Look at his shcedule last year – Romo played 9 games against top 10 Ds (counting AZ as one, which they really were when they were playing hard) and like 2 games against bottom 8 Ds. Cutler plays something like 7 games against bottom 8 Ds and maybe 2 against top 10 Ds. In the Buffalo game, a game they SHOULD HAVE WON, Cutler could just not get it done.
And McNabb? He hardly played like a great qb last year. Under any normal circumstances, Mcnabb’s play doesn’t get them into the playoffs. Remember that washington game? that was week 16 I believe. We’d crucify Romo for a performance like that.
Warner did undoubtedly play better than romo last year, i won’t argue that.
Looks like eminem is making fun of romo now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIkzQYns61Q
and jessica lol. the song sucks though.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
Now, this is the part I hate...
It’s the UGLY side of Romo which magnifies his flaws. I am okay with superstar QB personalities AFTER they win a few Super Bowls, not before…
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
how is it Romo's fault Eminem portrayed him in a video??
because he’s dating a celebrity, give me a freakin’ break.
In Romo we Trust
Because he is OUT THERE too much
He chooses to be in the spotlight.
He’s the Anna Kournikova of the NFL. Hasn’t won anything, but always on the cover of Maxim.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I strongly disagree
He does not choose to be out there and be in the spotlight, I think thats a very incorrect perception.
When you are the qb of the Dallas Cowboys and date a famous celebrity, the cameras and photographers are going to find you unless you become a hermit and lock yourself up in your house all day and night.
In Romo we Trust
Funny how Brady...
he of the 3 Super Bowl rings and multiple super-hot femaile companions, isn’t half the cover-boy that Romo is.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Where have you been the past few years?
Brady’s been everywhere. Just because he was injured last season he went under the spotlight, but even know he’s in the news, but i guess that wasn’t his fault. I also seem to remember him appearing at a Bush press conference a couple days before a playoff game.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
But not for partying and getting on stage with Metal Skool
Brady’s star ascended because of what he accomplished.
Romo’s star is squarely in the spotlight because of his position.
Again, one is Sharapova and one is Kournikova.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Kournikova has nicer legs than Tony.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions
So does Sharapova
There’s also some new Russian chick, can’t remember her name…
How did we get on this topic again?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
World Class Athletes. When you speak of them, you might as well include the name, Tony Romo.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions
Kournikova is world class
just not in athletics.
;-)
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Carson Palmer was on stage with Metal Skool as well.
So was Michael Strahan, hell even Dennis Rodman was there. It’s mostly how hard you look. The Dallas Cowboys are the most media-presented team in the league. Tony Romo being the quarterback and essentially the “head” of the team, or leader is most sought out for news, especially since T.O. is gone and in 07 when T.O. remained quiet. Tony Romo is Tony Romo, he’s not out doing coke with Quincy Carter and shooting up strip clubs with Pacman after dropping 500 bucks on a fight at Vick’s house. He’s a nice guy that treats the media too nicely at times.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
you must have been living in a cave the last three years
there is no player in NFL, other than maybe Manning, that is more of a cover boy than Brady
In Romo we Trust
Youtube Brady
you get highlights.
Youtube Romo, you get spoofs, homemade clubbing videos, and Metal Skool.
Call me crazy, but I see a difference.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
There's alot of controversy about Brady and his kid's close relationship with Michelle Monaghan...or Giselle.
Whichever way it is, it sounds sticky. I’m not looking that up though.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Do you hear more about that or more about Joe Simpson's meddling?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Not even Jessica can.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I hear more about the Romo stuff, but I wonder if the eastern seaboard is more Brady-focused.
Whatever the case may be, Romo still have way greater numbers than him last year—injuries not included?!…lol
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, but at least Eminem portrayed Romo completing the hamburger pass to Jess.
Even in spoof, he’s accurate!
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Regardless
Romo is part of the brunt of this.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
You should...
because it will weaken him more and more over time.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
idk this comes with being in the spotlight..
he is the face of americas team and things come with it good and bad if hes as great as i think he is he will take it in stride and not even bother him..
I think it will strengthen him as a person.
It should be motivation for him to further succeed in his own career. We all know that he’s not yet good enough to switch up to the PGA—maybe later.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions
He's close to making the cut...
My problem is his lack of mental toughness and if hehasn’t shown that on the field, why would we expect him to use this as fuel for his competitive fire?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Because when the primetime spotlight is on him, he can really perform...and perform well.
MNF is Tony’s game.
SNF is Tony’s game.
Thanksgiving or any other national holiday broadcast is Tony’s game.
He just has to get over those second-rate Sunday night broadcasts, and wear some long sleeves in away games during December, dude!
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions
very true
Romo has performed very well in some big primetime games, it’s funny how Cowboys fans all of sudden forget about those big wins.
In Romo we Trust
Terry - here are the numbers
I’ve crunched the stats on all 20 “primetime” games that Romo has played in, including:
8 SNF games (2 in 2006, 3 in 2007, and 3 in 2008)
4 MNF games (2 in 2006, 1 in 2007, and 1 in 2008)
3 SAT games (1 each in 2006, 2007, and 2008)
4 THR games (1 Thanksgiving Day each in 2006-2008, and 1 THR game vrs. GB in 2007)
1 PLAYOFF game (2007)
Totals:
647 attempts
407 completions
5338 yards
43 TDs
28 INTs
93 QB rating
The only “primetime” games that I see Romo struggling in (other than the PLAYOFF game versus NYG in which his QB rating was 64.7) is the MNF games.
Romo has played in a total of 4 MNF games and his QB rating is 67 for those games.
SNF QB rating = 98.9
SAT QB rating = 83.5
Thanksgiving Day QB rating = 127.1
Nice stuff! Maybe he prefers playing in front of Madden instead of those MN dudes.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions
Romo plays lights out on sunday night
as does the rest of this team.
No, Jess is. He's only the brunt of it to us.
He makes fun of Kim K, Sarah Palin, Lohan’s lezbianness, Britney (again), Amy Winehouse—just typical female pop-star bashing from the guy who’s made a few career songs off of it.
Somebody has to criticize the amount of pub, these rich chicks get.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 8, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions
BTW, Blings--Was it just coincidence that the title of this post include "Please Stand Up", in reference to that Eminem song.
Either way, great title timing!
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
Yes
It was all part of my master plan.
Thank you for bringing it to light…
;-)
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Nice. I think M&M should switch from the boring Lions' unpolished silver and weird blue to the Cowboys' royal true blue and sparkling silver.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:31 AM CDT up reply actions
All this celeb talk is...
nonsense.
This is all subjective.
Terry will argue one thing and it’s not entirely wrong or right.
5Blings will argue one thing and it’s not entirely wrong or right.
Each act like it’s the absolute truth.
Bottomline, is if by this time next year, Dallas wins a playoff game or two then all this stuff that really shouldn’t even be associated with football will barely be spoke of.
Know what I mean?
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
Yes.
Let’s wait and see how Romo does in 09 before we assume what will happen.
"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips
I'm just so scared of getting all excited when the season begins and they're kicking butt, and then having some late season LeRon Mclain heartbreaks.
Let’s just aim for 2nd in the NFC East, so we can kick out one of our sister teams in the playoffs. That always seems to ensure momentum.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions
What happens if we tank?
then what?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
The talk...
probably continues, even if it is or isn’t warranted.
There isn’t anything to say that it is or isn’t the reason for his turnovers or anything else.
If he’s that fragile that it translates into his play, then he shouldn’t be a starting QB anyways.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
What if
Romo falters or goes down and Kitna leads us on a deep playoff run?
Does Kitna become Kurt Warner while Romo turns into Matt Leinart?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Possibly
And if that happens than I’ll be ridiculously happy.
I like Tony Romo, but I’m a Dallas Cowboys fan foremost.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
horrible analogy
Romo is a proven franchise qb in the league who is a 2 time pro bowler with the only thing missing from his resume is playoff success whereas Leinart is an overrated qb from USC who will be nothing more than a career backup.
Warner is a HOF qb with a league and SB MVP on his resume, whereas Kitna has been just an average career journeyman qb.
Romo will not falter and Kitna will not lead this team to a deep playoff run, just won’t happen.
In Romo we Trust
It wasn't an analogy...
It was a hypothetical.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
no, you were comparing Romo and Kitna to Leinart and Warner
to me, thats an analogy, the Romo getting hurt or faltering would be the hypothetical.
Bottom line is this, if Romo misses any substantial playing time next season, we’re not making the playoffs because Kitna simply isn’t that good. Better than Johnson, absolutely, but playoff qb, no way.
In Romo we Trust
If we do succeed with Kitna having to come in for Romo, Garrett and Wade will look like geniuses!
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 9, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Or Jerry will...
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
idk
If we did go deep with Kitna as the QB and didnt win i think we would be in the same spot before ya we would get the playoff win that we have all been waiting for but for what are search would go on for who knows how many more years for a great qb like Tony Romo If we do go anywere i hope its with number 9 leading the way.
Maybe it's been so long that...
we’ve forgotten what it feels like to win the tough December games through grit and determination.
Regardless of which side of the Romo fence you sit on, his mythology is more that of a finesse QB than a flamethrowing hoss.
He’s more Brees than Bradshaw. More Tarkenton than Elway.
Exciting yes, but to Louie’s point above, can he lead Dallas to the promised land?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I thought you said......
QB’s don’t win championships-teams do. Well, last time I checked, we are a team so don’t be so fast to write us off. You never give Brady any credit for winning SB’s but here ya go saying we can’t win without Romo. So which is it Terry?
there is a big difference
and its too bad you can’t see it. Teams do win championships, not indivdual players, however, if you substantially lower the talent and ability of the most important position on the team, that being qb, of course that is going to have a tremendous impact on the success of the team.
I never said qb play doesn’t have a great impact on winning or losing games, just that it’s not the only factor. If we had a backup qb close to the talents of Romo, we might be okay if he would go down, but we don’t.
In Romo we Trust
That's crap
Changing the context of the conversation is bad form.
Generally speaking, someone has to lead a team to victory and thus far, Dallas’ ineffectiveness in the postseason can be traced to Romo not having shown the leadership moxie and mental toughness to lift his team out of a rut in a key December or playoff game.
By the same token, Brady and roethlisberger always seem to come up big in crucial moments when their teams need a play, a drive, whatever.
If this is your way of trying to protect Romo from the scrutiny he deserves for the the TEAM’s performance (I am suggesting he is the de facto leader of the team), then fine, live in your head. But the weather is much nicer out here in Reality.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
that simply is not true
Romo has tons of leadership moxie and mental toughness and to blame him for the lack of playoff success is simply wrong.
Brady and Roethlisberger play on great teams, Romo doesn’t.
Thats the reality.
In Romo we Trust
Brady and Roethlisberger are the biggest reasons their teams are great
I guess we’ll just have to go on in violent disagreement here…
:-)
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
If we tank, then Romo will get a considerable amount of the blame.
He did not play too well in the washington, giants, steelers, ravens or eagles games at the end last year, though i thought his effort in most of those was gutsy. If he continues to have problems next year throwing simple slant routes under pressure, we’re going to be looking for a qb in the draft to develop.
That being said, I have a ton of faith in Romo and last year..I don’t think the guy ever truly got healthy. His decision making to me wasn’t as godawful as many want to make it out to be, he was just physically off with his passes. And he got grounded into a pulp in the giants game which definitely looked to me like it affected him in the next two.
If Romo
gets hurt (he won’t get pulled), and Kitna leads us to a playoff victory or two, that would be great. He would go straight back to the bench though, because this is Romos team.
It’s not like Kitna is Tom Brady or something, the guy is ancient.
And Kurt Warner isn't?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Kitna
is no Kurt Warner. Look at how well warner played in the playoffs last year – kitna never ever has played that well. Warner is a magnificently accurate passer who is tough and a leader on the field. He stared down pittsburgh’s D and delivered strike after strike in that superbowl. And hes done that through his career in the playoffs.
Kitna never threw to Fitz and Boldin
He had Charles Rogers, and Mike Williams.
Mark my words, Kitna will play a big role in this upcoming season. Not sure how, but he will…
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Troy Aikman agrees with me
Most bloggers on BTB think I’m an unreasonable Romo homer, but I’m glad to see the Cowboys greatest qb of all time and HOFer totally agrees with me.
But Troy Aikman, who knows a thing or two about winning games as an NFL quarterback, doesn’t think the Cowboys should tinker too much with Romo’s risk-taking approach.
“Part of his recklessness is what has made him what he is,” Aikman said at the Wing Stop shindig in Valley Ranch the other day. "To me, yeah, you try to rein it in a little bit.
“Terry Donahue used to always say to me in college that you can’t throw a ball through a car wash without getting it wet, so stop trying. I said, ‘You know, sometimes you can throw a ball through a car wash without getting it wet. The problem is I only hear about it when it does get wet.’ That’s a little bit of the Tony thing.
“You can’t show and talk about what great playmaking ability he has when a play succeeds, then in the same breath talk about, but we can’t have these mistakes here. I don’t know that he’s that type of guy. That’s not the player that he is. I think you’ve got to take the good with the bad. I would tell you, with what I’ve seen anyway, there’s a whole lot of good that he’s doing out there at that position.”
Um, Cowboy Louie, going to disagree with the great Troy Aikman too??
In Romo we Trust
Really?
I don’t really care about your love fest for Romo, because alot of the things you say I agree with.
But when someone says “I hope that Romo is a hall of famer” or " I hope he leads his team to a championship" you are always the first person to hop on and be like.
“Oh he will”, not that there is anything wrong with optimism and not to say that you are wrong, but it’s a LITTLE weird.
I hope you’re right and I hope that Romo is and will be a great, but the fact that you state things about him like the future is set in stone is what make people think that.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on Apr 10, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions
I just believe in him
and thats why it comes off as set in stone. Its called faith and its too bad a lot of Cowboys fans don’t have it regarding their franchise qb.
In Romo we Trust
is it a LITTLE weird or
a little weird. Placing “little” in all caps is BIG weird—seems a little schizophrenic.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
Does that make it 'MEDIUM'?
;-)
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
What?
Troy is saying that Romo has upside. Couldn’t the same be said of McNaab or Trent Edwards or Rex Grossman?
I do think your posts are somewhat unreasonable in their unwavering support of Romo despite his poor decision making, ridiculous fumbles and stubborness when it comes to check down’s.
I also think you’ve anointed him the next great Cowboys QB when the fact is, even despite his big contract, the jury is out on Tony Romo and what he will accomplish with this very talented cowboys team.
That’s why I said 2009 is THE defining moment in Tony’s tenure in Dallas. If he doesn’t show marked improvement in several areas, then maybe Aikman will use the same quotes for our new starter in 2010 when Romo is playing in Oakland or St. Louis. The outcomes are not yet written, and I am fine with that.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I agree with this post
But I don’t think 2009 will be a defining moment, although it will be an interesting and important chapter. This is a very shaky ship right now with a lot of questions marks and a poor head coach (no I am not backing down on that one until I see facts to the contrary). If Romo has a bad 2009, given his contract, he’ll have 2010 to recover because its hard to win when a team is so poorly coached. The only teams I have ever seen win despite poor coaching was the 94 and 95 cowboys.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
I think you may be be right
unless Kitna comes in and rallies the team to big December wins and a deep playoff run. Then we have a QB controversy.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Listen to the word that Aikman uses to describe Romo
“Recklessness”
Here is the definition of “reckless”
1. utterly unconcerned about the consequences of some action; without caution; careless
2. characterized by or proceeding from such carelessness: reckless extravagance
Thank you, Aikman, I agree!
I agree when Aikman said,
“there’s a whole lot of good that he’s doing out there at that position.” And that’s how he ended his point.
Didn’t Green Bay fans support Brett Favre’s playmaking recklessness? Makes for exciting football.
Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Draft Nick Reed. Say that fast, five times!
by Aaron Novinger on Apr 10, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions
+1
Some of us talk so endlessly about all the bad things about Tony Romo that I think clearly some of us have forgotten about the GOOD things Tony does. He’s got flaws but he’s still really good. If the game’s close in the 4th quarter against a good team I always have faith that the guy can bring us back and get the W. I haven’t had that feeling since before Troy retired.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Just to be CLEAR
I’m NOT a Romo hater, I like Romo. He gives us our best chance to win now, but PLEASE, don’t put him in the same class as Aikman.
Things I like about Romo;
1) He seems like he’s having a lot of fun when he’s on the field (always smiling, laughing)
2) He’s got zip on the ball, especially the short to medium throws
3) He’s got great chemistry with Witten
4) He spreads the ball around to a lot of different receivers
5) He can usually turn a busted play into something positive
6) He’s entertaining in his interviews
7) He knows the ins and outs of Jessica Simpson (maybe this belongs on the list of things I don’t like about Romo)
I don't usually use terms like "hater" just because someone doesn't like a player I like
but it is true that many fans DO NOT appreciate the good things Tony does.
I’m also not putting him in the same class as Aikman. I said that I haven’t had faith in our QB to bring us back and get the win since before Aikman retired and I put it like that because Aikman was crap his last couple of years. Tony’s got some things he needs to work on but there’s still some things that Tony can do that Troy never could and that’s coming from a guy whose favorite all-time Cowboy is Troy Aikman.
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Terry was right when he said
Cowboys fans are spoiled.
We are…
We don’t need exciting football. But we do need to sate our voracious appetite for Super Bowl wins.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Was giving a definition really necessary?
Like anyone over the age of 13 doesn’t know what that means.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
I think he was doing that in the context of an earlier reply
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 


















