(Not So) Great Expectations
Expectations.
Since the mid-90's, Dallas has done pretty poorly in seasons where the expectations have been high. It's safe to say that Dallas, coming into the 2009 season, will be picked to finish either third or last in the division by the pundits and talking heads. After all, last year’s mediocrity coupled with an arguably lame duck coach and the jettisoning of the offense’s most explosive player makes for an upcoming campaign with a lot of question marks.
When you add in the highly lauded off-season personnel moves by other NFC East teams, the media is already lowering what they perceive to be the ceiling on this Cowboys team. But that could be a good thing. Expectations generally bring some drama with them, just ask the Plaxico-less Giants.
While I am no fan of Dallas’ head coach, the GM, or this past draft haul, there are still some things worth keeping an eye on (and potentially, feeling very good about) for the upcoming season and here are just a few;
OFFENSE
A Different Offense
Much has been made of the release of T.O. in the off season and how it might affect the offense's explosiveness, but what about how it could help Romo accelerate his development as a QB and allow him to do what he does best, namely, get the ball to the open man (rather than THE man, whether he is open or not)? If we observe continued development of ‘Tellus, does that mean we could see a double-TE base offense in Dallas? How tough would it be to stop an offense that sports two TE’s with over 800 yards receiving along with Bash (Barber), Flash (Felix) and Tash (duh) running it down your throat? It goes without saying that the o-line needs to be both healthier and better coached than it was last year. Watching Hudson Houck’s 2nd season as line coach with this group will be interesting. In addition, will an offense, which in all likelihood will have less explosiveness, but possibly a greater ability to methodically move the chains, help win the field position and time of possession battles? It seems reasonable to expect that the ‘O’ will help the ‘D’ perform better over the long haul by simply keeping them off of the field. You have to feel very good about the offense’s ability to develop more consistency and discipline, even if it comes with fewer ESPN Top 10 plays, right?
Running team, passing team or balanced attack?
This offense’s strength now clearly lies in its offensive line (starters, not depth) and its three young, talented running backs. One would expect that Red Ball will change his game plan to accommodate and take advantage of that set of strengths and take the pressure off of Romo to carry the load. Maybe it means he can use the running game as more of a decoy and help Romo take advantage of check-downs and passes to the flat more and more. Or, it could also signal just enough of a re-emergence of the running game to allow Dallas to return to more of a 50/50 pass/run mix rather than throwing it almost 2/3 of the time as they did last season.
Summary: whatever changes occur in training camp, it’s clear that Romo needs to feel like enough has changed so that the opposition doesn’t, to use Tony’s words, "figure out" what Dallas is doing again. A blind man could see his frustration after the Eagles debacle last year. This year, he and Red Ball have to be on the same page on every play. Romo has improvised too often in the past and it oftentimes has led to catastrophic outcomes. Garrett needs to impose more structure on Romo and ensure that he knows what to do and, more importantly, what NOT to do to in every situation. At the same time, Romo needs to take it upon himself to elevate the play of those around him, especially in times of difficulty. Side note: I personally believe that Romo sorely misses David Lee’s guiding hand and that Wade Wilson hasn’t really added much as the QB Coach, but I’ll save that for another post. Regardless, Dallas fans will be looking to see if Romo has learned anything from his history of miscues (especially the fumbles) and whether or not that translates into fewer turnovers and/or negative yardage plays. Don’t discount the value of a backup QB who has passed for 4,000 yards before and still has gas left in his tank. If Romo is out for any period, this offense can still click.
DEFENSE
Turnovers
We’ve all read about how Dallas had the sacks, but not the turnovers, last year. The addition of Gerald Sensabaugh gives Dallas a pair of athletic safeties who can run, cover and tackle. That, coupled with the chance of seeing Ellis, Spencer and Ware on the field at the same time in certain alignments could mean improvement in the area of pass-rush-induced turnovers. Also, after a year of getting more snaps than expected from Jenkins and Scandrick, they should be more comfortable jumping routes and making plays on the ball. The good news is simply this; it would be hard to imagine that we would get FEWER turnovers in 2009 than we got in 2008. The net result should be more short fields, some easy scores and less time on the field for the defense.
Middle Pressure
Dallas has one of the best pure edge rushers in the game in DeMarcus Ware. But what happens when he gets doubled or chipped or simply game-planned out of the picture? Greg Ellis is arguably out of position and on the tail end of an solid, yet unspectacular career. Anthony Spencer has a bunch of question marks surrounding him. Obviously, the front 3 has to win their one-on-one battles. The one major area that Dallas has sorely lacked good performers in, since installing the 3-4, is at the DE spot. Canty, Spears, Hatcher and Bowen have been invisible at times as base Ends. Think about it; when would you ever say that about Ty Warren and Richard Seymour when they are at full strength? Jay Ratliff, for all his high-motor heroics, just cannot continue to play 16 games at NT against the beefiest centers and guards in the NFL. Rotating him with Anderson or Siavii (and maybe sliding him out to DE) will be something that bears close scrutiny. Rat gives up 20-50 pounds every time he goes up against an average guard in the NFC East. His ability to penetrate is stunted by the fact that his job as NT requires him to occupy two blockers and allow the LB’s to flow to the ball. We also saw the middle of the defense wear down late in those awful December games. Seeing how Wade addresses this problem will have a lot to do with our overall defensive performance. All in all, it is clear that getting more pressure and movement out of the front 3 will be critical to Dallas’ ability to get the most out of Ware’s dynamic presence on the edge and control the tempo of games this season.
Summary: Dallas’ defense improved once Wade took over the game management last year, but the front line still wore down late in the season, likely due to Ratliff taking the constant pounding and Tank not being much help. In addition, the lack of penetration from the Ends was once again cause for concern, especially since Spears promised us a big year and Canty seemed poised for a breakout season. The addition of Igor Olshansky (who performed best under Phillips but has been nicked up) and Keith Brooking (also a Phillips guy who can still bring it) should be better fits in Wade’s scheme. One thing to watch will be the play of the secondary, which will continue to be a liability if they have to stay in coverage for too long, but also could be a solid, ball-hawking group if the line can generate more consistent QB harassment in the middle.
SPECIAL TEAMS
Kicking the Football
McBriar’s return from a broken foot is absolutely a contingency factor when predicting Dallas’ 2009 fortunes. If he has any lingering problems stemming from the injury, so will the Cowboys, in field position. Drafting David Buehler was a surprise to many (including me), but the word is that if he can consistently boot the ball deep into the end zone, he’ll earn a spot for himself as a specialist. I think that could be viewed as a plus. Given Folk’s recent surgery, Buehler is a valuable insurance policy.
Coverage
All these draft picks…you have just got to believe that SOME of them will stick because of their ability to contribute on Specials. Dallas hasn’t had great coverage teams since Joe Avezzano left town (I miss Joe). The new joe, Joe DeCamilis (who I know we all wish a speedy and full recovery to) comes with a solid resume and his hiring suggests that Jerry, Stephen and Wade understood that Bruce Read just wasn’t getting the most out of the talent available to him. Props to the front office on this one! Tell me you can’t wait to see a revitalized group of special teamers on the field who are ready to lay the wood…
Catch and Run
I don’t care who it is. I don’t care if it’s Flash or Scandrick or Newman or Wade Phillips’ daughter, but SOMEBODY OTHER THAN PATRICK CRAYTON needs to be the designated punt return guy. The good news is that it probably doesn’t make sense to have Crayton return punts anymore since Dallas has added a bevy of players with more suddenness and creativity with the ball in their hands. That should help our field position woes, but also, it should finally add some life to a moribund punt return game.
Summary: One has to believe that this is an area whose performance will be improving throughout the year. Explosion, whether it is off of the tee, through the hole or into the opposing ball carrier is what’s needed here. Supposedly, many of the draftees were chosen based upon their ability to compete with and win jobs against the bottom of the roster. Obviously, these guys will need to make a mark on Specials. We’ll also see what kind of a difference the new coach can make.
OVERALL
Two years ago, I said Dallas would go as far as Romo could take them. He led the team to a 13-3 ranking and the top seed in the conference before the team faltered. Last year, I predicted that the key player in Dallas wouldn’t be a player at all, but rather head coach Wade Phillips. While he was able to bring some needed fire and better play when he took over the play calling, ultimately it was defensive lapses (and questions about his ability to hold players accountable) late in the season that kept the team from being able to reach the post-season. This year, it will be the season of... well…I’ll save that for another post. What seems likely is that the offense will be less show and more go while revolving around B.F.T. (I trademarked it, so don’t try anything). The defense will sport a more athletic secondary and some new faces at DE and LB with a focus on generating turnovers and being disciplined in coverage. Special teams should be much improved with new faces in lots of places, not the least of which is the unit's coach.
All things considered, this appears to be a team that IS concerned with chemistry, despite what we’ve heard Jerry say in the past. We should expect to see a more disciplined, better-prepared team in all three phases of the game.
Side note: I would like to see this team formally dedicate the upcoming season to Rich Behm.
Finally, while this is not intended to predict our record or post-season fortunes, there are absolutely some things to look forward to in Dallas as we get closer to training camp and the season. Like it or not, the expectations for 2009 are somewhat lower, but who knows? Maybe that's the best thing that could happen to us…
GO COWBOYS!!
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
4 recs |
29 comments
Comments
Very nice post....
I can’t wait ’till training camp starts!
Hooah.
by .FRoST.USAF on May 14, 2009 2:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
really good post
i’d like to see us run it around a 41-44% clip. 37 is andyreidlike inexcusable considering the number of close games we were in last year.
by foyesboys on May 14, 2009 2:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Getting good yardage on 1st down runs will have a lot to do with that...
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 14, 2009 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Have to keep 2nd flexible and 3rd short.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 14, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was wrong with this post
we ran it at 42%. But still, the point is we need to do a better job running hte ball period – getting yards on 1st down, keeping the offense moving forward. I don’t mean we should run for runnings sake, we need to be more effective at it.
by foyesboys on May 14, 2009 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For sure.
Effective running can do alot of things for an offense.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 14, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post 5B...
After battling with you during the draft weekend, I was curious to see what you had to say about our upcoming year. Excellent write-up … you’re not quite the pessimist I had you pegged for!
I especially liked your comment about Romo missing Lee’s guiding hand… I totally agree.
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on May 15, 2009 2:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
RB's
As I was thinking about the running game for Dallas, it became apparent to me that of all of the positional coaches in the NFL, none is so critical to the success of a football team as the o-line coach.
I remember when we brught in George Warhop, who was supposed to be the prodigy, the wunderkind. As far as I could tell, he was a bust.
When Sparano came to Dallas, the sense I got was that he wasn’t doing anything dramatically different in terms of alignments and lane integrity, but more that he was good at demanding that the linemen communicate better and that they not have mental lapses.
I also saw how they would generate good yardage on middle runs against blitzes that were coming from Gregg Williams or Jim Johnson. That has to be the product of a well coached o-line.
I am planning to visit Training Camp this year and the one thing I am most interested to see Hudson Houck doing his thing, but I have to ask myself, is he washed up?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 15, 2009 9:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I give Houck
a semi pass last year because of injuries.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 15, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
…but the lack of communication on the line and the mental breakdowns that occurred when Kosier went down stink of either poor coaching or not enough time to adjust to Houck’s style from Sparano’s.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 15, 2009 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And....
Cory Proctor was also getting pushed back every time. That has something to do with it. Communication is great, but when you’re left guard is consistantly being pushed back and your left tackle next to him has a hurt wing, it’s going to put you at a disadvantage. I don’t care who the coach is.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 16, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about other position coaches?
Anyone you really like or dislike?
Got a beef with Ray Sherman? How about Skip Peete?
What do you think of the job that Herring and Campo have done?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 16, 2009 5:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Man...
You know, I think it’s just so hard to judge coaching sometimes until you see what someone else does with the same talent.
I think besides special teams there wasn’t just one glaring weakness in the coaching department… well him and Garrett, but at least Garrett has had one good year, big year for redball.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 16, 2009 6:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about Juraszek?
Seems like he gets a lot of flak for not being old school?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 16, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah....
I’ve thought about him before, how long has he been on the staff?
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by AirforceBat on May 17, 2009 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since 97
I wonder how the head coach (or position coaches) influences the type of stregth and conditioning training for their players if they want to see more quickness or explosion or power or whatever?
You never read much about what the regimen is like for each group in the off season.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 17, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is a good point, and one that is totally overlooked by the few media with access
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on May 17, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All eyes in camp will be on the passing game...
Romo has to get tougher develop that iron will to win, but tempered with good decision making and knowing that he can be the reason we win just as easily as the reason we lose.
The no-T.O. offense will need to be smarter and more focused (especially in practice) on executing the play as it was drawn up. Too often last year, Romo, wither by choice or circumstance) did his own thing.
What I don’t know is whether or not he has matured enough as a leader to do what needs to be done on an every down basis.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 18, 2009 1:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
I think Romo tried to carry out the gameplan that Garrett drew up the best he could given the circumstances that he faced last season and his desire to win is second to none IMO.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on May 18, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't and, more importantly, DON'T try to rank players' will to win
It’s even more folly than how you characterized post-draft grades.
What still needs answering is whether or not Romo is emotionally tough enough to be the team’s true leader?
Is he the kind of guy that the whole locker room will rally around, as opposed to just being the all-American poster boy for the team?
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 19, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there's any question
he can be the emotional leader of this team…without a doubt. If Romo wasn’t emotionally tough, he wouldn’t be the starting qb for the Cowboys after 3 seasons.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on May 19, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two Words...
Quincy Carter.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 19, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quincy didn't last more than three seasons
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on May 20, 2009 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Romo hasn't either...
yet.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 20, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
only a matter of time
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on May 20, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't tell me Owens didn't affect Romo's decisions...
I think Romo will have a better year simply by being able to let the coverage dictate where he goes with the ball instead of worrying about “Mount Terrell” blowing up because he wasn’t getting enough looks.
The guy may have been an explosive receiver once he got the ball in his hands but he was only average in terms of running the correct routes and actually catching the ball .
I am sure this statistic will never be available but it would be interesting to know how often TO freelanced leading Romo to throw what looked to be bad passes (the interception in the Pittsburgh game comes immediately to mind). No one ever called TO out on his route running for fear of the consequences.
Garrett needs to get a clue!
by BulletBob on May 18, 2009 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No question T.O. was divisive and I am glad he is gone
…but now that he IS gone, romo doesn’t have that crutch to use if the miscues don’t decrease dramatically.
Garrett’s leash on Romo has to be much shorter now, in much the same way Holmgren managed Favre’s recklessness when he was younger.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on May 19, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















