Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Race to the Roses & BCS Bowl Predictions

Cowboys Offense: Don't Sleep on Crayton

Even with the subtraction of Terrell Owens, much has been made about the Cowboys’ impressive arsenal of offensive weaponry. We all know about the three-headed rushing attack of Marion Barber, Felix Jones, and Tashard Choice. We speak glowingly about the tight end tandem of Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett, which may indeed be the league’s finest. Roy Williams and Miles Austin are often among the reasons for optimism amongst Cowboy fans. Still, lost in the shuffle is one guy who has been a solid contributor his entire Cowboy career. How has Patrick Crayton become the forgotten man (at least from a fan's perspective) on the Cowboy offense?

The Cowboys recently began organized team activities. When the Cowboys offense took the field, they did so with Crayton in the starting lineup, opposite Roy Williams. Miles Austin’s upside is through the roof, but isn’t this at least Crayton’s job to lose? He has at least earned that much hasn’t he?

Wade Phillips thinks so:

"I wouldn’t count Patrick Crayton out of anything," Phillips added. "He has a knack for making plays and does run well after catching the ball." (Phillips also referred to Crayton as a "top-notch receiver")

Minus a pair of crucial miscues in the Cowboys’ 2007 playoff loss to the New York Giants, Patrick Crayton has done everything asked of him, and for the most part done it all pretty well. In his only full season as a true #2, Crayton posted 50 receptions for 697 yards and found pay-dirt seven times. Not outstanding numbers under normal circumstances, but being the #2 wide receiver in Dallas essentially means that you are the #3 receiving option. When the tight end hauls in 96 balls as Witten did in 2007, 50 catches from your #2 wide receiver isn’t half bad. In his career, Crayton has twice (2006 and 2008) posted 500 or more yards as the #3 wideout (in other words the #4 receiving option).

Whether he starts or not, when the Cowboys employ a 3-wide look, Crayton will be in the slot where he is at his best. Too much is made of the notion of having a speed demon in the slot. Great top-end speed from your slot guy is a nice luxury, but not a necessity. Playing the slot is about short-area quickness, understanding of coverage, finding the open area, being shifty, and being sure-handed in traffic. Using that criteria, you can pretty much grab Crayton’s report card and check straight down the "Pass" column. Also, for a guy who is supposed to be slow, Crayton still somehow manages to sneak over the top on occasion.

Jason Witten is and probably always will be Tony Romo’s safety blanket, but it is feasible to imagine Crayton also being a guy who Romo leans on in crunch time. Crayton still has the best hands on the team, and seems to know how to find the sticks. In a league where consistency is paramount, it is hard to imagine how a known commodity like Crayton has been so often undervalued by fans and members of the media. Mixed in with all of the stars in Dallas, it is easy to lose track of Patrick Crayton. He will never be mentioned amongst the elite, but in my opinion Patrick Crayton has accomplished quite a bit for a seventh- round converted quarterback from Northwestern Oklahoma State.

1 recs  |  Comment 93 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

first

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
-Winston Churchill

by HudBaby on Jun 3, 2009 1:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

one of the more disappointing things about 08 for me

was how Romo’s blossoming connection with Crayton was subdued by the team bringing in RW and immediately giving him gametime. I thought in 07. Crayton was a very reliable receiver especially in red zone situations.

by foyesboys on Jun 3, 2009 1:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

he can't make something from nothing

But he is solid. You can win games with a guy like him.

However, since he can’t create, it makes it intolerable as a fan when he makes mistakes.

I say 8 TDs this year for him. He will be a consistent outlet for Romo while the majority of the defensive attention goes to our explosive players.

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
-Winston Churchill

by HudBaby on Jun 3, 2009 1:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess the fans still have a bad taste in their mouths

from the 07 Giants playoff loss and I’m sure a whole lot of people want to see Austin become what they think he’s capable of becoming, myself included. Maybe we should be pulling for Crayton just as hard. Good view Carl.

by Benthere on Jun 3, 2009 1:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

crayton is a great asset to the team

he does tend to get overlooked, and he gets blamed for the playoff loss, but he plays an important role, and it is more about how the pieces fit together and complement each other than who is the nominal starter. Austin still has to earn his place in the depth chart, but regardless of that he’s more a flanker and PC more a slot receiver, and both of them as well as Hurd are weapons. Teams will pay if they overlook Crayton, that’s for sure.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3SAEhtqkoI

by scottmaui on Jun 3, 2009 4:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I like Crayton but maui is right...

Austin complements Roy better, Crayton complemented TO very well since TO was a big play threat and Crayton was a possession receiver

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Jun 3, 2009 4:25 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree 100% on Crayton

My dark horse is Hurd. He also has great hands and is a good open field runner. He looked set to break out last year before the preseason injury against Minnesota.

Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.

Joe ThEEsman

by SB Six on Jun 3, 2009 6:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If Crayton hadn't let his Aligator Mouth

overload his Humming Bird butt I would have no problem with him. Any one who talks as much trash as him can not disappear in games, have the gaffes he did and not expect fans to want his head on a platter. If he keeps his trap shut, catches balls, moves the sticks and gets 6 TD’s plus a couple of unexpected TD’s, then all’s well that ends well.

When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.

by GunsUp on Jun 3, 2009 6:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I was very high on Crayton until he started running his mouth so much and didn’t back it up. Rather he shut up and be a consistent performer. He has demonstrated he can be a clutch receiver — most of the time — and can help us get to the tournament. But, please, Patrick, zip the lip.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jun 3, 2009 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen, Brotha

My thoughts exactly. Is Crayton a good-to-better-than-average receiver? Yes. Should we hold a guy over the fire for one bad game? Not usually.

But this guy has a mouth on him. I am afraid that if he does have a “break out” year, he will shoot off at the mouth, becoming another TO type distraction.

I don’t get that feeling from Austin or Hurd.

Jerry: George is dating a convict.
Kramer: Really? What's she in for?
George: Embezzlement.
Kramer: (Seriously) Sounds like a nice girl!

by HEpennypacker on Jun 3, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Easily the most underrated player on the team

Cowboys fans shouldn’t kid themselves, if this guy ever hit the open market there would be a very long line of teams bidding for his services.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 3, 2009 6:57 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm glad to have Crayton, but

Miles Austin is bigger, faster, and can make more plays than Crayton.

by Musiccitynorm on Jun 3, 2009 7:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What???

Austin has great hands but he physically can’t hang with Crayton. Austin has also shown he isn’t as durable a player as Crayton. Austin’s big plus is his speed and last season he started to show the good hands off during the pre-season.

by pick2568 on Jun 3, 2009 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with GunsUp

Shut up and Play. Also, due to some quirk of human nature we all tend to remember negatives more than positives.

Crayton has had solid numbers and I hope he continues, but the tape that pops into my head when I first hear his name is the playoff mistake. I hope he can replace that with a few good plays this year.

"He has a peculiar felicity of expression." John Adams

by Jim Vance on Jun 3, 2009 7:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with above comments

Crayton is a solid player but I hope Austin earns the #2 spot. Austin’s speed better compliments RW11 and Crayton has proven he can be a dangerous 3. If Austin can stay healthy and play to his potential this becomes a scary good offense. If Austin stays at #3 and has the same injury problems that has plagued him in the past this is just a very good offense that has to lean on the running game to march down the field. Either way I’m good.

by TK19 on Jun 3, 2009 7:34 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I've always said...

that Patrick Crayton gets more crap than anyone on the team. I agree that he should quiet down some, but there are ALOT of fans that think that he’s a horrible wideout.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Jun 3, 2009 7:49 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Crayton's biggest attributes are

sure hands(NYG playoff game excepted), ability to find seams and YAC. The last a little surprising since he is more quick than fast.

What separates him from the rest of our WR’s is his ability to be healthy and stay on the field. Amongst a group of players with greater ‘potential’ and ‘upside,’ that’s a distinction they don’t share. And that’s what makes him the more valuable player until they can show otherwise…

'It is not enough for me to win. My enemies must lose' - David Merrick

by tdships on Jun 3, 2009 7:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Staying healthy is a big plus.

I don’t dislike Crayton, I just expect more from a player with a mouth like his. It would be like me trash talking M. Jordan all day, but until I blocked one of his dunks, I would get little respect.

When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.

by GunsUp on Jun 3, 2009 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

good article…sums up my feelings about Crayton pretty well. His on-field performances have been very solid, considering he is a former college QB drafted in the 7th round out of a tiny college.

Yes, the Giants playoff game hurt, and his two miscues contributed greatly. But he didn’t allow the Giants to drive for a TD just before halftime, or allow a 25 yard punt return. And he did score a TD in his only other playoff game.

I read once that Bob Hayes completely blew chunks in his first ever playoff game, the 1966 NFL title matchup against the Packers. Not only did he catch one pass for one yard, but I believe he ran a punt out of the end zone and pinned the offense deep. Then, in the Ice Bowl, h caught 3 for 16 yards, and telegraphed every play to the Packers by keeping his hands in his jersey when it was a running play. What I’m saying is, if a Hall of Fame WR like Hayes can still earn our respect after playoff gaffes like that, then let’s cut Crayton a little slack. For this year, at least. Then all bets are off!

by DavidH22 on Jun 3, 2009 8:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Who amongst the WR's

Is a better blocker?? With the 3 headed monster at RB, I believe the boys will having a lot of runs being bounced outside. From the group that we currently have, i don’t know who stand out as good run blockers.

by thejanusman on Jun 3, 2009 9:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I think all of them block well, but Crayton is better than average.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 3, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Poor mans Welker

that writes checks his play can’t cash. “We came in and marked our territory (referring to Giants stadium)”. Possibly the dumbest thing anyone has said ever. Now the Giants are a powerhouse, and I’m sure they haven’t forgotten about how the Cowboys said they pissed all over New York.

The one thing I like about him is he can stay healthy, which is more than I can say about our other receivers.

by DoomsdayD75 on Jun 3, 2009 11:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know...

how you contrive Crayton to Welker. Their skill set isn’t similar at all.

I agree with the fact that he does talk ALOT, but I don’t really think of the Giants as a powerhouse.

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Jun 3, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree Airforce.....

Crayton and Welker are two very different type receivers. Welker is very quick and elusive unlike Crayton. Part of the reason that Welker runs the way he does is his soccer background btw.(see I know my Tech guys-lol). Look at him sometime, he runs very much like a soccer player. Hopefully, after last year, Crayton has learned his lesson about shooting off his mouth.

by texstar on Jun 3, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What???

He runs like a shifty fast WR, no soccer player could stand up to the hits Welker takes. Just the notion of a soccer player on a NFL field birngs visions of magic spray – ref, card him, I was fouled, carry me off the field, I may never walk again, oh wait my ball, I’m better now.

by birdness on Jun 3, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welker was a great soccer player in high school......

in fact, he had offers to play soccer but he wanted to play football. He had said that his soccer play has helped with his running style after the catch. What I meant by my comment, if you notice sometime, is he is indeed very shifty much like a soccer player. He doesn’t just run straight ahead but he runs zig zag like soccer player do in the open field which makes him very hard to bring down.

by texstar on Jun 3, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure...

I meant compare there… man do we need an edit button on here.

There is something I want to get off my chest. It's about that summer, when you went away to community college. I got an offer to do Playgirl Magazine, and I did it. I did a full spread for Playgirl Magazine. I mean spread man, I pulled my butt apart and stuff. I was totally nude. it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jun 3, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

Who’s that crazy quote from in your sig?

Is it too early to ask what round I should aim for Felix in my fantasy football league?

by Aaron Novinger on Jun 3, 2009 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

they are both small, quick, shifty slot receivers

seem pretty similar to me. The main difference is Crayton is a possession guy, while Welker is a play-maker.

by DoomsdayD75 on Jun 3, 2009 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not really

crayton is a dependable slot possesion receiver, hes not that small either. To be honest, there are not many guys out there that compare to welker’s skill set and do it effectively.

by foyesboys on Jun 3, 2009 10:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course...

Welkers skill set definitly is helped by the fact that Moss draws everything down the field away from him.

I think that there is a chance that Percy Harvin could end up being alot like him.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jun 8, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not that small

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jun 8, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just catch the ball

I’ve seen my dogs mark territory, I don’t need to see that from Crayton.

by birdness on Jun 3, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My Problem

is that he runs his mouth too much. I was a big fan of his until he started running his mouth. He has never been good enough to run his mouth and he never will. If he wants respect again from the fans, he needs to shut up and perform. Whether he is the #2 or #3 WR it doesn’t matter to me, just SHUT UP! Let his performance speak for itself.

by Boyz4Life on Jun 3, 2009 11:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Crayton is as good as gone next year....

We all know by now Crayton is a #3 WR in this league, not a #2. Im pulling for Hurd to take over the #3 spot at some point. Hurd is a Crayton clone, but alot younger and a little faster.

by Boyzfan94 on Jun 3, 2009 11:56 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yep, and a similar wind about Stanback

I hope they both become major contributors, but the time is now

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Jun 3, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

3rd year

coming up for Stanback to show what he can do. Let’s see what happens in TC before sending him home.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jun 4, 2009 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll make a prediction right here....Jefferson or another beats out Stanbach in training camp

Stanbach is cut…..I may be wrong, but with Stanbach about as fragile as a china doll Jerry will decide he needs to end the experiment and go with healthy body as the #5 WR.

RW
Austin
Crayton
Hurd
Jefferson

My five WRs going into September….

by Boyzfan94 on Jun 4, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only way Stanback gets cut is if he remains a china doll

If he’s healthy throughout training, he’ll be a star this preseason.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 5, 2009 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed,

although if he were from Ohio State I’m sure you’d be all giddy for him.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jun 4, 2009 8:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You heard the wind blow right..

TO, Ellis gone this year like I said. Although, I pull back some and thought Ellis would make is through the year, but be nothing more than a backup…..He’s gone…Next is Stanbach who may not make it through training camp. If so, he will be nothing more than the 5th WR on the roster and be inactive more than active. Doing pretty good on the predictions so far buddy… :)

by Boyzfan94 on Jun 3, 2009 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh are we playing the I was right you were wrong game?

Do you seriously want to do that?

Because if we are than lets also do the other thing and start talking about things that you have said that are wrong. I know there are some, so air it out.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jun 4, 2009 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

some?? lol

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 4, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Jun 4, 2009 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you don't know that

If Barbie doesn’t beat out Williams or Hodge in camp as Burnett’s replacement in the nickel package, he’s as good as gone.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 4, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

Carp isn’t a lock yet. He still has some work to do. I think the coaches would love to see J.Williams win the nickel LB spot, IMO.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Jun 4, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

whenever you want to take that bet I'll be sure to take your money....

Neither of those 4th round picks will beat out Carpenter…thats a joke…Add to that we are not deep at LB with Ellis gone…think….

by Boyzfan94 on Jun 4, 2009 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Carp is going to get some reps at OLB with Ellis gone.....

They were talking about this on DC.com yesterday…

by Boyzfan94 on Jun 4, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cool. I really, really hope he does. He and Rogers can be swing guys.

Is it too early to ask what round I should aim for Felix in my fantasy football league?

by Aaron Novinger on Jun 7, 2009 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not saying that Carp will stick around......

but you were the same one that guaranteed Ellis wouldn’t be cut earlier if I remember correctly. Face it, nobody really knows what management will do this year.

by texstar on Jun 4, 2009 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't guarantee it

I said it wouldn’t make sense with only rookies as backups at the position.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 5, 2009 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said that

I said I’d be shocked if they cut him.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 5, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

The coaches must really love what they see in Butler and Williams because it’s a scary proposition relying on 2 rookies as primary backups.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jun 6, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SI Ranking of all teams for the 2000's (decade)

Just out. Don Banks ranks us 20th out of all teams since 2000. Ouch. Yeah, yeah… no playoff wins. But I don’t think our rank should be that low.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/don_banks/06/01/decade/index.html

by Boundforbeach on Jun 3, 2009 11:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's a pretty good list

And while Eagles fans can talk talk talk about their regular season success this decade, they still choke in the big ones – NFC championships (-4) … and SBs (-1)

And while some fans seem to think churning replacements is somehow a rebuilding year, I like the Cowboys better than anyone else in the NFC for where we’re headed in the next decade. Solid QB, TEs, RBs and O-Line on the Offensive side, with a great crop of young WRs … and when’s the last time you could say that our secondary might be the strength of this defense? Scandrik, Jenkins and some rooks add youth to a solid veteran group of Hamlin, Sensabaugh and Newman. Throw in Ware, James and Rat, and this defense has potential to be great.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jun 3, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

we aren't too much higher than that

we sucked bad from 2000-2002. We’ve been slightly above average since 2003,but had a major down year in 2004 and a great year in 07. I’d probabl have us at 16-18.

by foyesboys on Jun 3, 2009 10:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

7th round former QB's turned into WR's

Will do what Crayton did in the playoffs.

How could you possibly expect more.

You get what you got.

Expecting Austin to all of a sudden be a viable #2 is also asking a lot.
How’s that Isaiah Stanback experiment working out.

Roy Williams
I’m always wary of good players on bad teams. Especially a team like the Lion’s

I question the players numbers because when a team plays Detroit it’s human nature not to take them as serious as the New England Patriots.

This year he will get everyone’s best. We will see.

Sounds like Jones is trying to get golden milk out of a monkey’s ass.
This team needs to completely fail before Jerry gets it.

Get the hell out of the GM seat or at least get a designated driver.

by Sharksbreath on Jun 3, 2009 12:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It's sort of like expecting a non drafted QB

Who has a pension for turning over the ball and losing concentration to lead you to a Superbowl.

Oh Well.

by Sharksbreath on Jun 3, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude...

Come on….

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by AirforceBat on Jun 3, 2009 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lurker...

10 posts in the two months since he joined … just a sad, disgruntled Iggles fan IMHO

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jun 3, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

you can get a “pension” for turning over the ball?

You stoopid.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jun 3, 2009 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha!

I had a 401K for turning the ball over, but was heavy into GM.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Jun 3, 2009 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha that was a reasonable post

until the “golden milk out of a monkeys ass” part. wtf?

by DoomsdayD75 on Jun 3, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rankings

If it makes you feel any better ESPN has us ranked 13th.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2009&week=0

by Sharksbreath on Jun 3, 2009 12:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

co-sign

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Jun 3, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pat Yasinskas???

If you look at how they voted, he has the Cowboys ranked #3 !!!

(must be reading Terry’s posts)

I’d put us more like #8 or #9 … definitely a dangerous team with how we went out. These guys should have something to prove.

On the other side, Minnie Mouse John Clayton has us at #22 … a vain and transparent attempt to earn some cred at the ESPN water cooler.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jun 3, 2009 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crayton might have learned a valuable lesson

on keeping his mouth shut based on changes the team has made and how he was perceived when he opened his mouth when he did and couldn’t back up his smack.

Life is full of lessons and nobody’s perfect. Hopefully Crayton has learned that distractions centered on an individual person isn’t greater than the team concept. I think he will keep his mouth in check and let his play speak volumes because the moves this team has made, has made it clear that distractions will not be tolerated.

I personally think he will have a very good year because he does find the seams, has good hands and stays healthy. From what I’ve read, he’s looked good at the OTA’s.

Having Austin as the #2 and Crayton working the slot will help this offense bigtime. Austin’s health will be very important for this offense. Having him stretch the field which will allow Williams, Crayton, Witten and Bennett to work underneath will enhance our passing game. Our deep passes won’t be as potent without TO, but our mid to short range passing will be very effective, even more so providing Austin stays healthy.

Can you imagine the defense’s problems trying to figure out who we are going to throw to this coming year? The last few years it was largely TO and those plays took awhile to develope because of how they played the man, to which the line would have to block a little longer for the plays to develope. We were telegraphing where we wanted to throw before the snap.

This year, who’s our go to guy? I will say Witten will probably lead in catches, but how can you ignore the rest? Williams has something to prove, Austin has speed to stretch, Crayton works the slot very well, Witten and Bennett are matchup problems, Barber is very, very tuff one on one to bring down, Felix and Choice have speed to burn coming out of the backfield. And that’s the passing game! Our mid level passing game will be very difficult to defend not to mention be easier for the line to block for.

Garrett has everything he needs to move the offense. He has more weapons than most teams have. There will be no excuse for failure in moving the chains barring a lot of injuries. How will defense’s defend our mid level passing attack? Good luck on that one, especially when everyone expects us to run the ball more and we probably will, but we won’t ignore the pass either.

by T Zig on Jun 3, 2009 1:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice summary.

The slot WR should really look to be a nice complement to Witten. I’m hoping that Garrett switches it up between Austin and Crayton to give defenses different looks.

Is it too early to ask what round I should aim for Felix in my fantasy football league?

by Aaron Novinger on Jun 3, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Austin takes over as flanker, and Crayton goes in the slot. I like it.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Jun 3, 2009 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i really like our recieving group

that include TEs and WRs. we have a lot of players that can create mismatches. I look for bennett and Witten to create defensive matchup problems that will open up the WRs and put them in a lot of one on one situations and I like our odds then. Both Witten and Bennett can block, both play some snaps at HB position and they both can catch and run as we know it. I can see us moving these guys around pre snap and create mismatches against the defense.

Roy Williams is not going to consistantly beat double teams, but I like his chances in one on one situations. I also think Austin, barring injuries will blossom. he is going to surprise the heck out of everyone. Crayton is steady as she goes.

this is a very under rated group. right now its sort of “in” to bash the cowboys. next year they will sing a different tune.

by CowboysFanatic on Jun 3, 2009 3:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Way to take that sack Romo!
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets From The Land Of Sunshine
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why The Eagles Game Is Not About Romo
Small
Cowboy / Eagle game analysis - using Drives instead of pure stats
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 9 - Final Edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Stats Only I May Find Interesting
Small
FOX coverage from Afghanistan
Bitty-p_small
The new media-darlings?
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Dallas’ "Knockout" Player
Porkchop_small
Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down -- First Half of the 2009 Season
Sb_xliv_ring_small
Humble Pie is Yummy!
Ept_sports_nfl_experts-348355349-1231708620_small
Good game..
Dirkn_270_060605_small
Anthony Spencer Won This Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher