Do we have it all backwards?
Easy Tex, this isn't a post about Tony's ball cap. The theory with the Cowboys has been that Garrett loved the vertical passing game and only runs when he has to. My view in the past was along the same lines - that Garrett - decended from the Air Coryell lineage - was pass-first, and having a QB who did his best work down-field and a deep threat like Owens only served to encouraged Red Ball to push the passing envelope.
Then I read an interesting tidbit from the DMN Mailbag that started me wondering:
... You are exactly correct in your assessment about a potential reluctance to rely more heavily on the running game. While the Cowboys seem to have a bevy of talented running backs, they had far too many carries last year for one yard or less - nearly 30 percent as I figured a while back. So just assuming they can just run over everyone is rather presumptive to me. In fact, the Cowboys it seemed had to use the passing game to open up the running game. As for your question, I think offensive line is capable, but will need the crafty Kyle Kosier out there or Montrae Holland to improve over last year. And the return of Felix Jones certainly will help the offensive line's production because of his unique ability to make at least one guy miss. Marion Barber has to run people over.
Some of you may have already been seeing it this way, but has Garrett instead been covering up his line's weaknesses in run blocking by passing first to set up the running game? It would explain a lot (inability to run between the tackles, high use of draw plays, etc.) but I wanted to hear your thoughts. Is this plausible? What does it mean for everyone's expectation that the team will become more balanced? Is it nurture or nature, attitude or aptitude?
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
1 recs |
57 comments
Comments
My Impression
Is Garrett is simply too predictable in his playcalling. There’s been a fair amount of discussion of his run/pass ratio, but that doesn’t tell the complete story. I remember far too many times him sending Barber up the middle on a first down when the the score is close, then wanting to throw it downfield on second- and third-and-long. If my impression is true, that kind of playcalling plays to the strengths of the defense (and fact on two occasions players on opposing defenses claimed they knew exactly what Dallas was going to do offensively—not the sort of comment one reads every day, and given my impression, not one that should be lightly dismissed). So I think the DMN exerpt has it backwards: Garrett’s mind-numbing predictability on first downs led to an ineffective running game, which created the impression, somehow, with five of the heaviest offensive linemen in the game, that we have trouble running the ball.
The Dallas offensive line has also become many people’s favorite whipping boy. Romo was only sacked 20 times last year in 13 games, which is outstanding, considering how much Garrett wants to throw the ball 30 yards downfield. The reality is a good offensive coordinator can cover for poor offensive line play. Tampa Bay moved the ball effectively in 2002 and won the Super Bowl with a below-average line, and neither Super Bowl team last year had a good line. Good coordinators know how to mix up runs and passes (and if the line is really that bad, go exclusively to short passes) to move the ball. But if the coordinator keeps blindly sending the starting running back up the middle on every first down, and wants his line to protect for an obscenely long time to throw those 30-yard passes, the line is always going to appear suspect.
One other note: Given the age of our line, I would not bet the five starters make it all the way through the season without injury. It’s an older line, and does not appear to have good conditioning in any event. Garrett will simply have to learn to use the full range of tools at his disposal to succeed.
by kindablue on Jul 12, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great points
I have to admit, teams calling out the predictability is really unsual.
Last year no doubt Kosier’s injury as well as Flo’s caused problems. So did Garrett fail to adjust as you suggest? It’s an interesting take. And maybe other factors are at play – fewer short patterns, increasing time for Owens to get separation…
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically
Kosier was considered the weak link in the offensive line before last year, the person we were trying to replace. What we learned last year is we have zero depth on the offensive line, with the possible exception of Holland.
It’s a shame we couldn’t draft Max Unger. That would likely have allowed us to dump Proctor and maybe Holland in one move. Then we could have made a concerted effort to find a replacement for Flozell in the next year or two. Now we have still to find both, unfortunately.
by kindablue on Jul 12, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
on all points, I thought Kosier was definitely the weak link. Obviously not THAT weak. And I really wanted Unger – he seems to have great talent and he can probably play any of the five positions at a high level. I really think they should have traded to get him in the draft but oh well.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a great point
Kosier was considered the 5th best OL man on the team. losing him shouldn’t impact the offense as much as it did.
by CowboysFanatic on Jul 14, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Predictable, Maybe...
but to a certain extent, it’s line up and beat your guy. Bottom line. We were far too talented a team last year for predictability to take that much of the blame. I can remember times in the 90s KNOWING the slant to Irvin was coming, and they couldn’t stop it.
by Iessthanmike on Jul 13, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barber up the middle on 1st?
Compared to other RBs in the division and league, MB’s splits by down were remarkably unremarkable. There certainly is no spike on 1st downs.
08 RB plays by down in%
………………………….1st…2nd…3rd…4th
M. Barber (DAL)………..52….38……9……1
B. Westbrook (PHI)…….57….38……5……0
B. Jacobs (NYG)………..54….39……7……0
C. Portis (WAS)…………50….40……8……2
A. Peterson (MIN)………55….37……7……1
Similarly, his splits by play direction don’t show a particular preference to go down the middle. If the figures below show anything, it’s that MB slightly favored the right side of the field over the left.
08 RB plays by play direction in%
…………..MB…BW…BJ…CP…AP
Far left….10….16….14….17….17
Left……..21….18….31….29….25
Middle….26….35….11….16….24
Right……27….19….33….23….24
Far right..16….12….11….15….10
The comparison of RBs shows that by and large, they are all equally predictable or unpredictable.
I think an argument could be made that with Felix Jones out, our running game overall became more one-dimensional, and opponents were better able to adapt. Similarly, DC’s quickly caught on to the fact that T.O. was easily neutralized by jamming him at the line, and that he was having more and more trouble getting separation downfield, thus also making our passing game more one-dimensional. And nobody had any trouble figuring out that Johnson/Bollinger were not the second coming of Aikman either.
Having said that, of course we became more predictable as the season progressed, but I’m not sure all the blame can go to Garret.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 12, 2009 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was hoping someone would
do the math on this. Thanks! Nice stuff.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Effort
But if you’ll recall, my comment was a little more specific than your research (and was admittedly based on my own subjective observations). Your stats cover on which plays Barber was used over the entire season, whereas my comment was based on what Garrett called on first downs, when the game was close.
Like the discussion of the rush/pass ratio, your research advances the discussion somewhat, but I’m still not satisfied we’ve dug deep enough yet.
by kindablue on Jul 12, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would look at the Avg. yards per carry for each of these...
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Jul 14, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your wish is my command ...
08 RB Avg Yds by down
………………………….1st…2nd…3rd…4th
M. Barber (DAL).………3.9….3.6…3.3…2.0
B. Westbrook (PHI)…….4.1….4.2…1.5…0.0
B. Jacobs (NYG)………..4.9….5.7…2.0…0.0
C. Portis (WAS)…………3.9….5.0…4.4…3.2
A. Peterson (MIN)………4.8….4.8…5.8…1.5
08 RB Avg Yds by play direction
…………..MB…BW…BJ…CP…AP
Far left….2.8….3.6….7.3….5.4….6.1
Left……..3.1….3.8….5.8….4.6….3.8
Middle….3.6….4.3….4.6….3.6….4.9
Right……4.8….4.6….3.4….3.6….4.9
Far right..3.5….3.3….4.7….4.6….5.1
Total ……3.7….4.0…5.0….4.3….4.8
… but I’ll leave you to comment on these figures. One thing I’ll add however is that MB’s avg yds dropped from 4.8 in 07 to 3.7 last year.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 14, 2009 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why do you assume the sack totals are the OLs doing?
A great escape artist like Romo has more to do with the low sack total than their pass blocking skills.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 13, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Noted
But Romo’s efficiency outside the pocket is pretty poor as opposed to when he stays in the pocket.
He (and the team) might be better served by staying home and taking a sack every once in a while.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Jul 14, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Jacobs would say you're wrong, lol
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 14, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thoughts
Personally, I think a lot of it has to do with Garrett was the typical creature of habit last year. Early in the 07 season and up until the Packers game on Thanksgiving, the Dallas offense was unstoppable, when suddenly Garrett was figured out by a lot of the better D coordinators in the league. Since then Dallas has had such a hot and cold offense. When the offense is on, it is all but unstoppable, but when they suffer, it is usually by a high margin. Garrett does need to focus more on the running game this season, but could you blame him with the players we had? With Owens, Crayton, Witten, Barber, and then the addition of Roy E, there is no reason to imagine why the offense shouldn’t succeed through the air.
Everyone wants to say this will be Wades last year barring a deep playoff run, but I also think Jason needs to be on the hot seat. The dude has to mix it up a little better if he wants to remain an O coordinator in this league.
by Zach22 on Jul 12, 2009 1:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really felt good about how Garrett mixws his play calling and
adjusted in his first season, but not so much in his second. I have to wonder how much is play calling and how much execution? Part of it must be execution since the team appears to be working really hard on that in OTAs so far.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also do not know what to really think about Garrett as a OC
With the inconsistent play on the field for reasons unknown – injuries, coaching, lack of effort or focus it’s hard to put a finger on the root cause. Be that as it may he is the bottom line and the person responsible for having his unit ready to play on Sunday. Well, maybe Wade is were the buck stops, but man can he really be totally responsible for both units?
by bad knees on Jul 12, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Wade can't really be totally responsible
In the end, Garrett is going fail on his own, while taking down Wade with him, or succeed and pull the whole team up. I know that Wade is up to the task of making this team a top 5 defense. The question is whether Garrett can do the same. I think he will but I’m an optimist by nature.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 8:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's been my thought for a few years now that the line could not run block!
I have been ranting and raving on several different sites about our lines inability to consistently open holes for the running backs. But really it all boils down to age and ability; from the last couple years of Larry Allen, who could open a hole at the point, but cold no longer effectively get to the second level to desperation fill ins like Rob Pettiti and Torrin Tucker ( who I will argue to my dying day would have made a great guard ), too ill advised and or bad luck free agent Marco Rivera and a light weight center in Al Johnson. I don’t have facts or figures, just my memories and opinions- which is all that matters to me really, but I think one would have to go back to the start of the decade to really find any kind of effective line play, but then that was when we had running backs like Troy Hambrick, Richie Anderson and the last days of Emmit Smith ( who did go on to have some good games with the Cards).
Anyway, the fact that since the days of Erick Williams and a young L. Allen the line has been just an after thought; It seems to me like no real effort or sacrifice has been made to acquire the quality players needed. It’s just been like, well who’s left or Here’s a guy we might could make into something!
Fact is, it’s just faulty phylosophy! When you build a house, the first thing you do is lay a good, level, solid foundation that supports the structure for many years to come. Dallas ounce had such a solid group to support it the players that everyone sees, but over the years the time had eroded away this group a little at a time; but instead of using quality materials to make the necessary repairs, they chose to use cheap and second hand material which could not support the pretty, and popular names that lined up behind it.
Thus, here we are, the foundation is better than it was, but not quite as good as it should be.
When I was a small child in Sunday school we sang a song that has served me well throughout my life in many different areas, the jest of it was " The wise man builds his house upon the rock" A solid foundation will make the good better and the great legendary.
by bad knees on Jul 12, 2009 1:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sunday School ca. 1974-1976
Don’t build your house on the sandy land, don’t build it too near the shore
Oh it might be kind of nice, but you’ll have to do it twice
And you’ll have to build your house once more
You better build your house on a rock
On a good foundation, on a solid spot
And though the storms may come and go, the peace of God you’ll know
That was also the time my folks picked up this Dallas Cowboys comic book for me and my brother in church and I’ve been a fan ever since – of the Cowboys, not necessarily the church. Strangely, my brother turned into a Steelers fan …
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 12, 2009 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What Ive come to understand
is that Garrett was simply playing to the strengths of his players. Theyre good pass blockers but below average run blockers. Being pass heavy worked for the Pats pretty well. However, I do believe he could have mixed in more short passing. Maybe Owens had more leverage than we think.
x
by BlueZombie on Jul 12, 2009 3:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
is the problem the line or the runner?
If the line is so bad, how did TChoice average 5.1 yards per carry?
Granted this includes a pedestrian 3.8 against the Steelers, but Garrett stuck with him and he amassed 88 yards total in that game against a pretty good defense.
He gained 90 plus yards against both the Giants and Ravens?
Bottom line: Great coaches develop their scheme around their player’s abilities. I think we’ll be able to tell early on if Garrett has learned this lesson. I think he has. In other words, I predict Barber will return to his role as closer where he is a star.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
by dave33 on Jul 12, 2009 3:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it might be both
I don’t think the line opens up gaping holes like they did in the halcyon days of Smith. But I also think Choice has an Emmitt-like ability to feel out the smallest of creases and exploit them. I don’t have numbers, but it sure seemed like the team was overwhelmingly poor at straight-ahead blocking and only pulls and draws seemed to be effective.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its a combination of everything
I’ve never felt our run blocking was anything above average. But what makes it even worse is when an injured Barber is starting and getting the lions share of the carries, while felix and choice aren’t being utilized. There was no accountability for the veterans/trust in the rookies this year between garrett and wade. Wade kept playing a really troubled henry over scandrick/Jenkins. Garrett didn’t give felix or choice many chances early in the year – what felix did in such limited opportunites was nothing short of incredible.
I have no problem with garret passing 55-60% of the time because our line is simply a better run blocking line and we have plenty of receiving talent. The majority of the time, we don’t run well on first down which is why garrett ends up calling passing plays. This can snowball out of control, like Garett allowed it to in the first Washington game. But my major problem is that there is no deception in our passing game – there seems to be a total lack of screens for example.
by foyesboys on Jul 12, 2009 6:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
money comment
i questioned each and every one of your points mentioned above on several occasions throughout last season.
let’s hope they improve this upcoming season.
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
by silverblue5 on Jul 12, 2009 7:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great comments
It’s really hard to know from the outside. Like you guys, I am looking for them to adjust the approach to take advantage of the unique skill sets they have.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 12, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda get the feeling
that the coaches have a renewed sense of urgency. What with the extra practices and all.
x
by BlueZombie on Jul 12, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
man, i hope you're right.
Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/
by silverblue5 on Jul 13, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I read it the same way
Not extra practice as in being tougher, but extra practice in terms of attention to detail and improved execution – more time on task.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 13, 2009 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
i doubt our training camp will involve significantly harder hitting – although it could cause apparently all our rookies and blue collar athletes who can bring the wood – but I’d bet we spend a lot of time on execution on offense and special teams.
by foyesboys on Jul 14, 2009 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
I think that it must have been a serious flaw last season that is transparent to us because we don’t get the coaches tape and we don’t know exactly what eash player is supposed to do on each play.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 14, 2009 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our run blocking was outstanding in 2007
…as was the overall play of the line.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Jul 14, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
in teh second half it was
but before we wore teams down, our run blocking was nothing special. We ahd the same problems we do this year. Remember how bad julius looked behind our line?
The offensive line seemed to wear teams down with straight pass blocking – we had such an elite passing game and line that you could SEE dlineman getting tired rushign Romo. We also didn’t play very well in the first half in general, we went into halftime tied or barely leading plenty of BAD teams. In the second half, the D tired, and our passing game and Barber took over.
by foyesboys on Jul 14, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
our OL hasn't been good at run blocking in over 15 years
you really have to back to the days of Stepnoski, Allen, Gogan, Tuinei and Williams when our run blocking was better than average.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 14, 2009 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting question
And I agree with most of the sentiments already raised. However one thing I believe, our frequent use of shotgun draw plays near the opposing goalline was not mere coincidence. Nor do I see that as Garrett repeatedly making a mistake, to mee that shows that our o-line has a fundamental weakness when run blocking, as he didnt have faith in our large linemen to win the battle at the line of scrimmage.
Prime Time: If we were playing a game of pickup basketball, what should I expect?
Tony Romo: Well...I'd spot you 10 points if we were playing to 11.
by aussie_cowboy on Jul 12, 2009 8:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i never had a problem with the run/pass ratio
it’s just the type of passes we threw, it seemed like 9/10 passes were 10 yards + down the field, with 7 step drops. I’d like to see more slants and such, quick outs, short hooks, to keep down and distances manageable and protect our QB.
by stephen1 on Jul 12, 2009 9:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That should be the direction theyre steering.
With #11.
x
by BlueZombie on Jul 12, 2009 9:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a thought
Maybe the reason our offense was so awesome in ‘07 was due to Sparano & Garrett? I do have faith in Garrett, but it seems kinda strange that after he left our offense became too predictable and generic. Maybe Sparano helped Garrett mix it up and the Cowboys had a hard time in "08 of filling that void? I think people are discounting what Sparano did while he was here with our offensive playcalling AND our OL. I know there were injuries and such last year, but it can’t be a coincidence.
Will Garrett step up this year? I think he will.
by Boyz4Life on Jul 12, 2009 11:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with those who have
noted that many of their passing routes take way too long to develop. That hurts.
I have always thought that the O-Line’s relative success in terms of allowing sacks was more due to Romo’s ability to avoid rushers than any special skill at pass-blocking.
Romo was sacked 20 times in 13 games last year, Brad Johnson and Brooks Bollinger were sacked a combined 11 times in 3 games; Romo was sacked an amazing low 24 times in 2007 in 544 pass attempts, and in 2006 Romo was sacked 21 times compared to Drew Bledsoe’s 16 sacks. But Romo more than doubled Bledsoe’s pass attempts that season.
Interestingly, another Cowboy QB who we remember as being especially elusive – Roger Staubach – was sacked with alarming frequency in the 70s. Over once every 10 pass attempts (313 in 2958). I know, different times and such, but I still found it interesting.
by DavidH22 on Jul 12, 2009 11:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with your reasoning
from what I see in game replays. Romo avoids a heck of a lot of sacks.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 13, 2009 6:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he could just hold on to the ball while doing it...
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
by dave33 on Jul 13, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This really points to a larger question -
does this team have an identity ? If so, what is it?
I think we are closer on D to having an established persona, if you will – we are a Pressure First defense, which was saddled with secondary limitations. Hard to imagine we’re only a little more than 2 years removed from starting R WIlliams(I) and J Reeves in a playoff game.
On O, I am not sure what our identity is – smash-mouth? Not so much. Veritical ? Hard to say now with our speed moreso at RB than WR. And even that is limited to a part-time player. Makes sense we are a Right Running dominant team – could argue Bigg/Columbo are our better drive blockers, especially last year.
My concern with the O is we seemed impatient, tending to give up on plays, gameplanning if they didn’t yield immediate results. Sometimes the play(s) you are running are to set something up later on. But if you give up on that early on, then there is no cohesive strategy you’re trying to implement
Agree it appears we are an average run blocking team and the best we can hope for with the returning RG is to be above average, unless someone breaks out to a degree we haven’t seen. Offense in general and Running specifically is about imposing will on the opposition. I haven’t seen that, except for the 2nd WAS game last year.
'Kade Out!'
by tdships on Jul 13, 2009 6:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hate this team’s coaching staff…
Period.
I have since the day Wade was announced the new HC and I still do today. I really do hope that they are taking a different approach this year and that more than anything they will bring some fresh and innovative game plans to each game this year.
On offense I almost never saw anyone in motion (which at the very least can help the QB get a pre-snap read on what type of coverage he’s facing); they never tried crazy ideas like lining up Owens or Williams in the slot. It seemed to me like Garrett never really looked for mismatches to exploit. In the Ravens game they routinely played their safeties a good 20 yards off the line of scrimmage and yet the Cowboys never ran any sort of patterns underneath the coverage.
The defense did seem to play better once Wade took over the play-calling and maybe that’s been what he’s needed all along; to focus more heavily on defense rather than play this more passive GM type of role. I hope so and if nothing else I do feel better about this approach for 2009 (but damn it if I have to watch another season where these CBs line up 20 years off the ball and give the opponents WOs a clean release off the snap, I’m going to smash my TV).
Demarcus Ware: The Beast of the East.
The L.A. Lakers are 2009 NBA Champions!
by gee-roj on Jul 13, 2009 8:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There's hope on the horizon
Another season like last season and they are shown the door.
OR
The improve, win some games, have a nice little (or big) playoff run, and all is well in Cowboyland.
Seems like a win-win scenario to me.
"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach
by dave33 on Jul 13, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Last year I would see our CB’s lining 15-20 yds off of the receiver on 3rd down and it was obvious what was going to happen. That was extremely frustrating and hopefully we will not see that again this year all the time.
"So you can’t stiff arm at all? What about the throat?"- Marion "Barbarian" Barber
by DC_fan on Jul 13, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, come on...
It was 7-12 yards off.
That was mostly Henry you’re talking about, too.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Jul 14, 2009 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was more than just henry
remember newman was hurt early in the year too, i thought they played him off a little bit more than normal.
by foyesboys on Jul 14, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind Garrett passing so much, but I would like to see more variation.
“Romo-friendly”, to me, should not just be about the running game, but should incorporate a more QB-friendly passing offense. I thought Garrett would try to adjust his game last year when Brad was in, but I didn’t see the passing game become more ball control. He was still asking Brad to throw sideline outs, and loft out-and-ups. DBs are always all up on those. Pi$$ed me the F off last year!
My hope is that Garrett helps to control the ball by using more options out of the backfield, as well as screens to the WRs and TEs. Watching what NE does with Welker and what the Colts do with Wayne makes me jealous. JG should be feeding certain players even if its just a 4-5 yard pickup. Guys like Felix and Miles will have more opps to break big plays and 1st-downs will be more easily attainable for Romo. Cutting 3rd-downs to 4 yards or less will allow Romo more options, including picking up the firsts with his feet.
Whatever keeps the chains moving is beneficial to ST and the D as well. We don’t need to score on every possession, but just keep the tempo on offense wearing down the opposing Ds so that they will eventually break down.
All eyes on Free.
by Aaron Novinger on Jul 13, 2009 9:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3 reasons why the Cowboys are a passing team
1. Cowboys have one of the best QBs in the league so obviously the ball should be in his hands as much as possible.
2. Garrett was a former QB and believes you score points through the passing game.
3. Our OL cannot run block as well as it pass blocks.
Personally, I think our RBs will do more damage to opposing defenses this season by catching and running the ball as opposed to gaining yards from the LOS.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 13, 2009 10:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You'd better hope not...
If that is true, you’ll see 10 times the number of blitzes we saw last year and Romo will be on IR by mid-season.
They need to run the rock with great effectiveness this season or the next coach will take the ball completely out of Romo’s hands and make Dallas VERY conservative.
"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
by 5Blings on Jul 14, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
that is simply not true at all
The next HC will just do the opposite, especially if it’s Shanahan or Holmgren who both love Romo and love to pass.
No coach in the their right mind ever takes the ball out of a pro bowl qbs hands.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 14, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he makes a good point
if Dallas can’t do better against the blitz (and sometimes against simple four-man rushes), Romo is meat out there. Running the ball well will prevent teams from ignoring that threat and heading straight for the back field.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 14, 2009 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but if your OL isn't good at run blocking
you’re not going to run that well. A new HC would have to completely revamp the entire OL to run effectively on a consistent basis, but if he does that I’m sure Romo will also be protected as well.
In Romo we Trust
by Terry on Jul 14, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
taking us back to the topic of the fanpost… which is the chicken and which is the egg? Does Garrett avoid the run because he must or because he wishes to. You are essentially saying that the line is not good at run blocking. Which is fair – there is evidence enough to support that.
I didn’t raise this but I often wonder if not running more creates a situation where the line becomes bad at it. That is to say both technique-wise and attitude-wise a team that establishes itself as primarily a pass blocking line becomes that and has difficulty – technically and mentally – assuming another identity.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 14, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















