Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

Cowboys Magazine: Wade Phillips and the 46 Defense

[Ed Note]: BTB will be running a series of posts over the next few weeks highlighting some of the articles in the new magazine Maple Street Press Cowboys Annual. I did the editing and Rafael did a lot of the feature writing for the magazine that will go on sale July 21st in outlets around the country. You can pre-order the magazine for delivery by visiting the Maple Street Press website. Besides getting a great magazine with 128-pages of Cowboys goodness complete with plenty of analysis and photos, you'll also be supporting Rafael and I along with BTB. So go pre-order now.

Today's feature article is by Rafael Vela entitled: Who's Your [Football] Daddy? Wade Phillips and his Two Football Fathers. I'll let Rafael do the set-up for the article and tell you more about it.

 

Wade Phillips dusted off the 46 scheme he learned from Buddy Ryan to rescue his season.  Dallas played the 46 close to half the time in the Redskins rematch win and used it a lot down the stretch.  Dallas has an improved coverage secondary this year, with a lot more speed at the safety position.  For this reason, I expect Phillips to blitz much more heavily this year.  With a trusted -- and bigger -- Keith Brooking playing MLB instead of Zach Thomas, I think Wade Philips will unleash the Bear package and its blitzes a lot, lot more this year.

-- rv

Star-divide

[Excerpt from the actual magazine article]:

Dallas limped into its bye having surrendered 439 rushing yards in its previous three games. Good teams were out muscling Dallas's front seven. On the line, only Ratliff played consistently good ball. His backup Tank Johnson, either played very well or hardly at all. The same was true of right end Chris Canty, who could dominate for a series or a quarter, and then disappear for equal amounts of time. Left end Marcus Spears was playing better football, but he lacked big play ability.

[snip]

Phillips then made a tactical switch, elevating the 46 from a change-up, third down defense to his primary scheme.

Buddy Ryan created the 46 scheme on the philosophy that the defense should dictate play to the offense. It modifies a base 4-3 scheme to maximize interior pass rush, create rush mismatches on the edges, and put eight men within five yards of the line of scrimmage to create numerical edges for the defense against running plays.

The first change involved moving the best pass rusher from end to nose tackle. In Chicago, Ryan lined up Dan Hampton between his defensive tackles. In Philadelphia, Reggie White lined up on the nose. The thinking is to put your best rusher on one of the line's weakest pass blockers one-on-one. Because two defensive tackles are playing over the offensive guards, neither one of them can help the center. On the strong side, the 46 deploys two linebackers, one on each side of the tight end. One or both of them can rush, creating an overload on that edge if the tight end releases on a pass route. On the weak side, the speed rusher lines up wide and gets to duel the tackle in space.

The scheme plays to Dallas's strengths. Dallas's best rushing lineman was already on the nose, but putting two tackles alongside him meant he could not be double teamed. DeMarcus Ware was already playing the Richard Dent/Clyde Simmons role, only from a two point stance instead of with his hand down. Bradie James emerged as a rushing linebacker in 2008 and lining him up next to Greg Ellis gave offensive coordinators headaches. Both of them finished with eight sacks and an opponent could not be sure if one or both of these skilled rushers would attack the quarterback on any given play.

The 46 also covered up the Cowboys rush weakness at inside linebacker. With three defensive linemen parked over the three interior offensive linemen, Dallas could play a smaller, speedier middle linebacker and let him float to the ball. Dallas had such a player in the 227-pound Kevin Burnett. He had excelled in coverage as Dallas's nickel backer but the coaches had been reluctant to play him on first and second downs. The 46 made him an every-down player.

What's more, the Cowboys could shift easily from set to set. They could deploy in their base set and then slide both defensive ends inside. James would then walk from his strongside inside linebacker slot to the gap vacated by the end and the 46 was in place.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

OK I'm sold

but the website doesn’t seem to be working, I’ll try again later.

Does your train of thought have a caboose?

by CounterEMF on Jul 2, 2009 9:55 PM CDT reply actions  

server error

me too, when I try the preorder link

by scottmaui on Jul 2, 2009 9:56 PM CDT reply actions  

The 46 sounds great.

I guess the weakspot is exposed when a short pass is completed and the safety whiffs.

x

by BlueZombie on Jul 2, 2009 10:11 PM CDT reply actions  

Plus if the QB has a quick release and your receivers get off the line quickly.

I read an article where Don Shula said he thinks the Dolphins beat the 85 Bears 99 times out of 100 because Marino, Clayton, and Duper’s skills were tailor made to blow up the 46.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jul 2, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll take Don's bet if it's legal to steal from a senile old man

He may have had a tailor made team to play them, but the Dolphins would have been very lucky to have won 25% of 100 against the 85 Bears.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 3, 2009 6:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

They whipped them in 85.

I guess since they beat them 38-24 the only time they met that season and no one can prove otherwise, he can make that claim.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jul 3, 2009 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

west coast offense killed the 46

I believe we got burned on this vs baltimore when the rb cut back to the weak side. There was a huge hole between spears and spencer, since spears was playing over the guard.

by BigE on Jul 3, 2009 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe since Rex Ryan (Ravens DC)

is so familiar with the 46, he knew how to beat it…although I doubt if Baltimore game planned for two 70+ TD runs…

by DavidH22 on Jul 3, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

watched the painful replay last night

yes, there was a hole, but there was also big time missed tackles…

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Jul 3, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

it's not always x's and o's

 it’s the billy’s and joe’s.

Our secondary was horrible. Henry clearly lost a step. Williams couldn’t handle Todd Heap, who showed up for the first time in 2 years. Hamlin couldn’t handle the fumble. Terrible all around.

by DoomsdayD75 on Jul 3, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

one bright spot in that game: TChoice

"Confidence doesn't come out of nowhere. It's a result of something... hours and days and weeks and years of constant work and dedication." --Roger Staubach

by dave33 on Jul 3, 2009 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most defenses get burned if a quick pass is completed and someone misses a tackle

I hear what you’re saying but I don’t think that scenario is only a weak link for the 46.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 3, 2009 6:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

If you have a safety who can cover

and Sensabaugh seems to be that guy,
we’re gonna see a lot more pressure.

by Rafael Vela on Jul 2, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd settle for some wins, pressure, sacks, or not.

I’m on the road to Cali my friends.

NO more living in Skins territory.

Go west young man, go west.

by THEjarhead on Jul 2, 2009 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Be safe!

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 3, 2009 8:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welcome to Debtland

and the most inept state gov’t iin the union!

I’m still here, though-there are things you can’t beat about living here-where are you settling?

by Realist Larry on Jul 3, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Awesome article.

I wish I could see some x’s and o’s with it. Like, okay, here’s what the base looks like, and then arrows showing where those guys move, etc. If I get time, I might try to put something together for this article, but I am very weak at my design skills. Hmm, I wonder if Madden could be used to show this.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jul 2, 2009 10:55 PM CDT reply actions  

I wrote a fanpost a little while ago...

With some schemes, if you want to have a look, here ya go:

The 46 and Cowboy packages

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jul 2, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

How did it work?

Not very well..All this defense did was rush the QB..Baltimore ran the two longest..back to back runs in the history of the NFL..78 and 83 yards..

Philly ran amok through the defense in the final game..and don’t give me the offense turned the ball over..It was 21 zip before the Boys had a single turnover..

Wade is a loser..and the Boys won’t be a winner until he is gone..and he can take Jason Garrett with him..

by bevomav on Jul 2, 2009 11:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Future teller, eh?

Well I guess you shouldn’t waste your time watching the games then. That should be a nice timesaver and allow you to be real productive on Sundays. You can leave the thrill of the possibilities every sunday to us true fans.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Jul 2, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, 17-3.

The D could have been more stout, but the offense went 3 and out on 3 of their first 4 drives, and amassed a total of 3 yards on those drives. Philly did have 2 long touchdown drives in the first half, but they were a top 10 offense and at some point, your offense has to get you off of the field.

Dallas’ first half drives: 3 plays/ 5 yards/ punt, 15 plays/ 61 yards/ field goal, 3 plays/ -1 yard/ punt, 3 plays/ -1 yard/ punt, 4 plays/ 16 yards/ interception, fumbled kickoff return. Clearly neither unit played well.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jul 2, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Man, was Terence Newman hurt that game?

Because he had a rough first half. He whiffed big time on the tackle on the 60 yd Buckhalter catch that led to a TD (and someone else was clearly out of position on that one, I think Bradie James), then got burned by Jackson on a 30 yarder that led to another TD, and got called for Pass Interference in the end zone on another drive that led to a TD. Not his finest hour. Pacman didn’t help either.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jul 2, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your optimism is overwhelming.

I think the team has addressed some of the issues that were glaringly pointed out during those games. I, for one, eagerly await the start of a new season.

by Benthere on Jul 2, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

funny how that works…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 3, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

We all eagerly await the new season, as we do every year.

The 46 has certainly shown some promise, and having the personnel to run it makes a big difference, but all that matters now is taking the next step, defensively or offensively. If Gerald is a 50/50 safety in the NFL, its an upgrade.

Looking forward to seeing what happens.

by THEjarhead on Jul 2, 2009 11:34 PM CDT reply actions  

Everyone worries about the loss of Ellis, but this article points to Burnett

Because Burnett couldn’t find his way into the starting rotation, it was easy to dismiss his abilities. But as this article points out, he was perfect for the 4-6, where a rangy LB is needed to cover more ground behind the numbers stacked on the LOS.

I have a feeling we’ll be relying on these rookie LBs more than people are currently anticipating. And that’s without any injuries.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 3, 2009 1:00 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, that was the point I got stuck on

“Dallas could play a smaller, speedier middle linebacker and let him float to the ball. Dallas had such a player in the 227-pound Kevin Burnett. He had excelled in coverage as Dallas’s nickel backer "

Who’s that guy this year? Carpenter? A rookie, even one who’s a converted safety?

Where’s Godfrey Miles when you need him?

by Realist Larry on Jul 3, 2009 1:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Burnett could play in the 46

but he was too small to play in the 34.

That’s why they have Brooking now. And this is why they drafted Jason Williams.
Both those guys are 240. I’ve seen a couple of Atlanta’s games from last year.
Brooking couldn’t play WOLB in a Tampa two style scheme but he’s still got some speed.
He should be able to play Burnett’s role. If nothing else, he’ll outdo Zach Thomas,
who was the same weight as Burnett.

The 46 will probably be used a lot, but Dallas won’t use it every down. Maybe 20 to 25%
of the time. They use it more on passing downs, to get Ratliff free from double teams.

by Rafael Vela on Jul 3, 2009 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Carpenter, not Brookings

I know Barbie gets a lot of flak, but he’s tailor-made for the WILB position as used in the 46 and Phillips 3-4.

Also, looking at the “Cowboy” vs the 46, I see too many similarities. In fact, the “movement” you describe in the article sounds more like the 3-3 Cowboy formation rather than the 46. Of course, I could be wrong, but what are the real differences?

Further, what are the real weaknesses? I don’t buy the “short slant” demise.

It's not personal, it's just business

by Fighter15 on Jul 3, 2009 7:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too date

Wade has not shown any confidence in Carpenter. Twice he has gone to the free agent market for ILBs and this year he drafted two guys to compete for Burnett’s position. Carpenter may be well suited for the position but he just doesn’t seem able to beat out other guys competing for the spots he could play. Both of the rookies are bigger than Burnett and faster than Carpenter. As for Brookings, his coverage performance in the Atlanta playoff game didn’t really inspire much confidence. The preseason games are going to tell us a lot about this spot and it should be very interesting.

by jevans1729 on Jul 3, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ratliff is the Key

Rat’s ability to use his quickness in the middle is the key to this scheme. This also explains why Dallas has had so little concern about acquiring a classic 3 – 4 nose tackle. Having a complete set of defensive backs is a necessity, as well, and Dallas has been building this piece for a while now. Henry was a great free agent pick up but his injury status limited his role; the backups at safety last year were very poor. The new set of defensive backs as a block unit excite the heck out of me as the year approaches.

by Iowacowboy on Jul 3, 2009 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're right

That is a very cruel joke. Some people may have just finished eating their breakfast and had to suffer that. At first glance, I thought Larry the Cable Guy was mooning for the camera.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 3, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know guys, I guess I'll believe it when I see it.

I got so tired of watching teams just March down the field on us last year. I mean year end and year out, I bite my fingernails all the way up to the elbows. Don’t try to be cute, just give me the Doomsday 3 plz.

by bad knees on Jul 3, 2009 8:32 AM CDT reply actions  

The fabled 46....

The words “46 defense” evokes powerful memories. From a fan perspective, the scheme is associated with all things right with a defense….dominance, disruption, aggression, in stark contrast to the hated “read and react” schemes. I guess my biggest question is which other teams regularly employee the 46? And why did the 46 seemingly go away after Buddy left the Eagles. Someone else suggested that the west coast offense brought about the demise of this defense. If that’s true, why are we all looking at a revival of the storied 46 as a cure to all our problems? As someone else pointed out, it certainly didn’t save us in the Baltimore and Philly games, a win in either of which would have propelled us to the playoffs.

by Boundforbeach on Jul 3, 2009 9:04 AM CDT reply actions  

I always assumed that Ryan took the 46 with him

to Houston (as DC) in 1993 and with the Cardinals in 94-95. I think the Cards had a decent defense in 1994, at least.

by DavidH22 on Jul 3, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Whatever Dallas does, other teams will make adjustments

I understand what you’re saying, if it’s a great defense why did it have it’s day then went away. Having said that, your could say the same thing about the spread formation or wild cat for that matter. They all made come backs years after they were the norm. I suspect one reason it wasn’t more widely copied is that most teams didn’t have the personnel to run it.

We need to remember the 46 isn’t a base defense, according to Raf it would be used 25% of the time or so. Plus, it sounds like there will be a lot of at the line of scrimmage movement to disguise it some.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 3, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm guessing that it's a scheme that is returning because...

… this is a different League than what it used to be…

With all the 3 and 4 wideouts schemes and pass catching TEs DB coverage is at an all time high, we’re seeing more and more schemes that take prototype SSs out of the field in order to have 2 coverage safeties on.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jul 3, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm guessing that talent is more imp't than what scheme you run

The Bears that year had a D full of guys performing at their peaks, got the Fat Fridge when he was young and for a year they were maybe the best D ever.

But I’ll take a 4-3, 3-4 whatever you want to call it if you give me the better players/athletes/leaders.

by Realist Larry on Jul 3, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Defense is the key...

Last season with the injuries..the offense was crippled..With a healthy set of running backs and a healthy Koser..I look for the Offense to get better..Plus azzwhipe shuffling off to Buffalo..that will help..

In the last 10 years only 2 teams..The offense juggernauts of the Pats and Colts..had defenses rank out of the top ten in Defense..Fix the D and everything else will play itself out..Look at the Steelers..Their D keeps them in the game until the offense catches up..

by bevomav on Jul 3, 2009 9:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Where is Dave Campbell's Dallas Cowboys Outlook?

I just ordered a copy of the magazine.

From the webpage, it appears to be a worthy successor to Dave Campbell’s Dallas Cowboys Outlook. As it is, the annual Bluebook is just a stripped-down, gussied-up version of the media guide, with no analysis and very little review of the prior season.

I look forward to reading it.

--
Dallas Cowboy Books Blog
http://tinyurl.com/CowboyBooksBlog

by fgoodwin on Jul 3, 2009 12:56 PM CDT reply actions  

I must have completely missed it

who won that “what to expect from the 09 Cowboys” short write up contest a few weeks ago? Did it go into the mag?

by sublimezg on Jul 3, 2009 1:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Burnett was quick like a cat, but too light..

The thing I remember about Burnett was that he seemed to have gotten much smaller as the year went on – I swear he looked like about 215lbs or so by year’s end…he should have invested in some protein shakes.

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Jul 3, 2009 4:20 PM CDT reply actions  

I remember him having some great hits in a preseason game.

But in the regular season, it seemed that everyone could drag him at least for an extra yard or so. We need LBs that drive guys backwards or at least stick them at the point of contact.

All eyes on Free.

by Aaron Novinger on Jul 4, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It was probably the source

of his injury issues. He wasn’t afraid of contact he was not built to handle.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 4, 2009 10:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

The weakness of the 46 was always its susceptibility to big plays.

The Bears had a bit of luck in that 85 season (except against Miami), but this could be a good change gears look from time to time. I like the aggressive mind set.

by krl97a on Jul 3, 2009 8:23 PM CDT reply actions  

I think so too

it’s not an every down look, but it can give a team fits if they aren’t ready for it.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 4, 2009 10:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think a 46 should be a base scheme.

I’d use it if my team is getting throttled by the run. But it is unbalanced.
The middle zone can easily be exploited in this scheme.
Having James and Brooking in there would make me nervous.

The true benefit of the 46 is shoring up the middle run defense, particularly in the 3 or 4 technique. We had issues sometimes where Ratt would get blocked down on and we didn’t have adequate run support from the will cough Zach cough. And we’d get throttled on a run. you put a 3 technique along side the NT and you have some support. you can blitz from this formation too, obviously.

This is also known as – in some coaching circles – and “eagle” shift. Since the 3-4 is an odd formation – you can do this. FYI – you can eagle either side of the formation or “double eagle” which creates the 46.

by rotovibe on Jul 4, 2009 3:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah I don't think they are saying it'll be the base scheme...

But that it’s easy to shift to it, out of your base scheme.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jul 5, 2009 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Isn't it technically

a 45 if you have Roy Williams in at SS?

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 5:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Omarav_small
The 17 Years Myth
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Bedtime Stories Part 1: What KMAAN
222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
2012: Random Thoughts about Anything but a Quiet Offseason
Demarco_murray_st_louis_rams_v_dallas_cowboys_baxpocve6rkl_small
Headed in the Right Direction...(Delusional or Reality)
Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...

Recent FanPosts

Small
Jenkins Or Spencer
Small
Beat the Pass Rush
Small
Romo and the Super Bowl Question
Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn