Cowboys Magazine: A Look at the Running Game by KC Joyner
[Ed Note]: BTB will be running a series of posts over the next few weeks highlighting some of the articles in the new magazine Maple Street Press Cowboys Annual. You can pre-order the magazine for delivery by visiting the Maple Street Press website. We appreciate any orders, you'll be supporting Rafael and I along with BTB. So go pre-order now.
Today's feature article is by KC Joyner entitled: Six Innovative Plays: Breaking Down the Cowboys Running Game. I'll let KC do the set-up for the article and tell you more about it.
[KC Joyner]: One of the writing mountains I climb every year is putting together my annual Scientific Football book. This tome takes a detailed metric and scouting eye look at every team in the league and that task typically requires 2,000-3,000 words per franchise.
Even with that level of verbiage volume, there are still times where I am not able to pen everything I want to about a club. It was with that thought in mind that I gladly accepted an assignment from Maple Street Press to contribute to their Cowboys annual. Dave Halprin, webmaster extraordinaire for Blogging The Boys and editor of the MSP Cowboys magazine, asked if I could take on the challenge of putting together over 8,000 words in a series of metric-based articles.
I was more than happy to take on the venture because Dallas is one of those teams whose talent level and performance level don't always equal one another. I wanted to go as deep as I could into the performance metrics and scouting notes to try to get a better feel for which players were truly meeting expectations and which weren't. That was the central theme in the offensive and defensive articles in the mag.
I also wanted to take a closer look at Jason Garrett's playcalling to see if he really deserved the level of grief he was taking for the state of the Cowboys offense. I did this by taking a closer look at the Boys rushing attack, or more specifically their creative use of the counter play, an excerpt of which is posted below.
I would also like to the opportunity to invite you to take a look at my series of Scientific Football articles on the New York Times Fifth Down blog. I use these to take a look at every team in the league and will be posting one about the Cowboys running backs on Monday, July 6.
Make the jump below for the good stuff.

[Excerpt from the actual magazine article]:
Let's start with the most basic bread-and-butter power running play, the counter. Dallas ran some variant of this play 93 times last season, making it easily their #1 rushing choice. The Cowboys typically use the counter play to attack the left flank of the opposing defense, as fifty-eight of those ninety-three counter-style runs were directed towards the right side of the Boys offense.
A good example of how to properly execute this play occurred in week 17 game against the Eagles in week 17. Dallas used an I-right formation with a pro set (two running backs, two wide receivers, one tight end on the right side of the offensive line) against the Eagles standard 4-3 front. The conceptual idea behind the play is that the offense is partially selling a run to one side of the field and then sending the ballcarrier to the other. The subterfuge is a temporary ruse designed to get the linebackers to take a step in the wrong direction, thus giving the point of attack blockers the initiative and a slight time advantage on their blocks.
Its success revolves around four blocking areas. The first three are the triangle of the left defensive end/strongside linebacker/middle linebacker. These three are the point of attack impediments and must be moved out of the way for the ballcarrier to gain yards.
A triumvirate of blockers has the responsibility of accomplishing that task. The first of these three is the right tackle. In our example play, Marc Columbo's responsibility isn't just to neutralize the left defensive end with an angle block. He is to try to drive the end as far away from the hole as possible.
The second is the fullback, who on this play was Deon Anderson. Anderson's job is to perform a running drive block at the strongside linebacker. His goal is similar to the tackle's in that he wants to push the defender out of the hole as far as possible, but it is made more difficult because of the amount of ground the fullback has to cover before he can make his block. That might be too big of an impediment to overcome except that the outside linebacker has the responsibility for keeping the play from bouncing outside of his gap. That obligation is such that Anderson should have enough time to make his block if he gets on his horse.
As soon as the tackle and fullback start making their moves, the middle linebacker will immediately key the tight end to see where he is going. Once the tight end passes him by to block the backside pursuit by the weakside linebacker, the middle linebacker will recognize the counter run and close to try to fill the gap.
That's where the third person in our trio, left guard Cory Procter, comes in. His main focus is to ensure that the middle linebacker does not stuff the gap. If everything goes well, Procter will leave the hole completely clean of the linebacker fill but at the very least he needs to make sure that the linebacker is blocked to one side or the other so that some kind of run lane crease is made. The worst result is if the guard does not clear the linebacker out, as the runner will either get stuffed in the hole or will have to bounce the run outside of the intended point of attack of the run.
When these blocks are made, the halfback will find a lane that can only be closed by the strong safety. If the safety moves quickly, he can usually hold the play to around five yards, but if he misses the tackle, this run can turn into big yards in a hurry.
Hat tip to BTB's own icStars, who created the graphics for KC's article in the magazine and has contributed graphics to this blog. Thanks!
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
can't wait to read the whole article
and all the rest. put in my order last week. great stuff.
by scottmaui on Jul 5, 2009 9:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought the writer was joking
“A good example of how to properly execute this play occurred in week 17 game against the Eagles in week 17.”
Took me a while to realize that wasn’t sarcasm. Good article, though!
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
by Grady90 on Jul 6, 2009 4:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
we had a solid first drive
I was impressed with garrett’s playcalling in that first drive, but it stalled. It gave me some false hope
by foyesboys on Jul 6, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is the stuff you won't find
anywhere else. Thanks.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 5:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this is a solid piece, but I'm greedy...
I want to hear about how this play was actually executed in that game. What happened when it worked? What happened when the defense busted it up? Was it execution or were there other factors that came into play (defensive motions/blitzes…)?
When I saw the reference to Eagles game, I thought there might be a commentary such as “given the lopsided score, the play worked better because the defense was playing the pass.” Or if it did not work, some assessment like “Anderson missed his assignment twice in the five times they ran the play that day…” (sorry, Cricket, I know you’d never)
Maybe that is too much to ask, but it seems the logical next step, and gets into the gritty stuff that the coaching staff is really discussing during the off-season.
Like I said, call me greedy… because the piece is great; I love when the playbook starts to be dissected.
Question for Grizz / Raf / etc… I am overseas, how to get a copy? Is there an online version I can pay for?
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 7:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
I would like that question answered too
by aussie_cowboy on Jul 6, 2009 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overseas versions
You can order an electronic version of the 2009 Scientific Football Almanach here for $ 14.99. The Cowboys Annual from Maple Stree Press is available here for $ 12.99 + $ 12.00 for overseas shipping and handling (at least that’s the rate I paid for shipment to Europe). No electronic version that I’m aware of.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 6, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good news on Scientific Football
I had had a few discussions with KC about shipping. Because he is a small supplier he couldn’t get bulk shipping rates and it cost $35 for a $30 book (I see this year its $43…). Rather give $15 to KC than $43 to the Post Office.
I guess $12 effectively doubles the cost of the book, but at least its only $12 – and its 100% Cowboys!
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
by BoyfromOz on Jul 6, 2009 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the electronic version
You get the run metrics NOW. He’s still working on the book, and that won’t be out till August, but he’s done most of the run metrics (which he group by division) and he sends those out hot and fresh from his computer. I know he finished the NFC East two or three weeks ago, so you can get those today, if you wanted.
by Rafael Vela on Jul 6, 2009 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any way to post a link to the acutal clip of the play being run in that game?
It would be interesting to compare the graphic above with the actual play.
by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 6, 2009 7:13 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
excellent idea !
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was their most called running plays last year
and one of their most successful.
Dallas ran it about half a dozen times in EVERY game.
by Rafael Vela on Jul 6, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
one more footnote...
It’s always easier to ask for other people to do the work; I hope everyone here takes a moment to appreciate all the hard work that goes into cranking out so much material – and maintaining a combination of high quality and unique style… great stuff BTB!
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 7:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and show appreciation
by ordering a copy of the annual!
by scottmaui on Jul 6, 2009 7:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm on it ... i also need to buck up for Training Camp
if only to see grizz on some funny videos with his crazy buddy – name escapes me at the moment
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
To quote K.C. from his 5th down series:
For those who might not be familiar with it, it is, in my humble opinion, the best Dallas Cowboys site around. It is run by Dave Halprin and Rafael Vela, two guys who live and breath everything about the Boys and whose dedication shows up in the quality of their work.
I agree, the editorial content is outstanding. I also love the quality and the effort being put into a lot of the fanposts. As I’m fairly new to the site, even going through the old editorials and fanposts is entertaining and enlightening. Keep it up BTB.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 6, 2009 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh oh
a typo
live and breathe. not breath.
They live and breathe the Cowboys… I imagine their breath runs more towards beer and onion rings.
by Joey2zs on Jul 6, 2009 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Typo Psycho
Even the venerable NY Times is not immune to a typo or two. I copy/pasted from their site, that’s why it’s in block quote, but correctly should have marked it “and breath [sic] everything”.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jul 7, 2009 3:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Side note
What does [sic] mean? I have seen it on numerous sites, but never understood why it is used.
Prime Time: If we were playing a game of pickup basketball, what should I expect?
Tony Romo: Well...I'd spot you 10 points if we were playing to 11.
by aussie_cowboy on Jul 9, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's Latin
for “as such” and usually means that the spelling is incorrect but is being quoted as it was found in the original.
You can alos use it describe something awesome – Dude, did you see Felix rip off that sic [sic] run! :)
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 9, 2009 1:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So they ran that play 93 times
but for how many yards? Broke down by each RB?
by DavidH22 on Jul 6, 2009 9:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
see!! we're all spoiled at BTB :)
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Follow KC's link to the NYT blog
It has a breakdown of YPC for each RB, though it’s not limited to this play, unfortunately.
It's not personal, it's just business
by Fighter15 on Jul 6, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His article in the annual
and in SF ’09 break down each running back by play type.
by Rafael Vela on Jul 6, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
buy the annual
and you’ll find out
by Rafael Vela on Jul 6, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
is it me..
or is 93 times a LOT for a counter play.
by foyesboys on Jul 6, 2009 12:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only if they stop it!
I recall MBIII getting a ton of yards with this play. He’s effective with the counter because he’s good at taking on the last player and getting upfield for the first down.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not
Teams run what, about 25-30 running plays a game.
That’s about 480 running plays or so a year.
There are only about six to eight running play types — dives, isolations, off tackles, sweeps/tosses, counters, stretch plays, reverses.
If a play is successful, and this was a successful play, you run it a lot.
by Rafael Vela on Jul 6, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How many times did Emmit
score on the lead draw? If they can’t stop it you can’t stop running it.
When did I become a Cowboy fan? When my mom told me I was.
by GunsUp on Jul 7, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great work
I’m willing to guess the counter play talked about in the article and ran in Week 17 probably wasn’t effective. Proctor missed his block and the play went nowhere.
All there is to Dallas doing better (offensively) is to split the carries between the RBs. And of course Garrett has to finally learn some common sense, which is calling running plays consistently. The offensive line, as big as it is, needs to block much better, especially run-blocking. It appears to me that they are soft and I think that’s pathetic. I’m really surprised the draw wasn’t the most called running play by Dallas. At times it seemed as if that was the only running played called. With an offensive line that’s as big as they are, they should be punishing opposing defenses.
by Burt88 on Jul 6, 2009 11:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's actually Procter's strength
Pullng. His weakness is pass blocking. Holland is not quite as good pulling but pass blocks a little surdier.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh this is nice stuff
Good work fellas
by sublimezg on Jul 6, 2009 12:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A perfect example of a variant of the counter...
Can be seen here:
Minute 3:35, enjoy, Barber has a long TD run.
It’s from the 2007 season, which serves as an example of how our team used the play in 2007 and how teams couldn’t find a way to stop it in a consistent basis a year later…
Sorry for the quality of the video…
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
by Chandus on Jul 6, 2009 12:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A much better Q video...
Against the Packers last year.
Kyle Kosier… Our team certainly missed him…
Viva México! Go Cowboys!
by Chandus on Jul 6, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Notice the illustration of that sweep play
See how the WR to the right seemingly has no blocking responsibilities? Owens played that to a tee on running plays, especially when Big Bill was in town.
by GhostofGaryHogeboom on Jul 6, 2009 1:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We have all the bullets needed to take out the other teams
All we need is the O-line to give Romo the time to pull the trigger.
by mutombo4life on Jul 6, 2009 2:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm interested to see Andersons success rate.
From what I could tell he did not play very well, and that could have attributed to some of our struggles running the ball.
I bet Columbo was the one who got screwed out of the pro bowl though. I thought he should have gone instead of Flo.
by DoomsdayD75 on Jul 6, 2009 8:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder that too
he certainly never stood out to me like Moose used to. But it could also be the way they used him. Interesting point.
Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.
by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How does it work if you buy the electronic copy,
does that mean if you wanted a hard copy you would need to pay another fee, or is it an option left open once the full hard copy is available?
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Jul 6, 2009 10:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There is no electronic copy
It’s a print magazine.
by Dave Halprin on Jul 6, 2009 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then does that mean it was electronic access not an electronic copy?
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Jul 7, 2009 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, sorry for the confusion Grizz
I see that the other comments were referencing the football journal that JC does is not related to your endevour.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
by cowboy78 on Jul 7, 2009 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grizz... you can take credit for one order from Thailand
… and I still need to buck up on your TC budget. As long as you spend it on dogs and beers every once in a while… otherwise we can’t live vicariously enough!
Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?
by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 1:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















