Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Doug Free: The Future at Left Tackle?

They're not playing basketball, but they wouldn't mind a sixth man. Can Doug Free be that guy?

More photos » by Tony Gutierrez - AP

They're not playing basketball, but they wouldn't mind a sixth man. Can Doug Free be that guy?

Unfortunately, the Cowboys can’t be deep at every position. In regards to offensive tackle, the team looks rather thin behind starters Flozell Adams and Marc Colombo. Investing a draft pick in Robert Brewster could provide Colombo a backup for years to come; although, Brewster is raw and not likely to be the active swing tackle on gameday this season. Last year, Pat McQuistan backed up both tackles but saw little action. It’s hard to believe that he will maintain that role with third-year man Doug Free looking to live up to his own potential.

Many of us know so little about Free because he's had limited playing time, having spent much of his short career inactive. The Cowboys picked Free in the fourth round of the 2007 Draft. His rookie year began with a start in the first preseason game, but ended quickly with a knee sprain in that very game. The injury delayed his development, as he would spend the rest of the preseason rehabbing and the first 15 games of the regular season as an inactive player. At least he saw some regular season action when the Cowboys rested their starters in the season finale against the Redskins. As it turned out, that fourth quarter work at right tackle provided him more playing time than he saw all of last season.

Star-divide

Even though Free has shown potential in training camp and practice, the coaches must have felt more comfortable keeping McQuistan active last season. "McQ", who is a bit more experienced and can also fill in at guard, also allowed the team some options on the interior line while Kyle Kosier and Montrae Holland missed time. But he is not the only option for this season. Dallas needs an upgrade at the tackle position, especially behind the 34-year-old Adams. Where it can be argued that McQuistan has hit his ceiling and is not exactly a prototypical NFL left tackle, Free’s potential and much talked about "quick feet" should ready him to close the gap between starters and project players.

The question remains: Is Doug Free being groomed to eventually take over the starting left tackle job, or will he just be a career backup?

We all witnessed Flozell Adams tough it out through injuries last season. In the past, he’s handled edge rushers, and more often than not, rendered them ineffective. But haunting images from a game such as last season’s in Arizona, where Tony Romo was rushed early and often--mostly from his blindside, make me wonder if the team is more prepared for a substitution at left tackle going into 2009. And having turned 34 in May, how many starting years does "The Hotel" have left in the tank? One more? Two? He’s signed through 2013. We can agree that NFL contracts are rarely set in stone, but for Adams to even sniff at playing his out, he has to show he’s a young Jackie Slater; he has to show that last year was just a bad year, not a body of evidence that his skills are diminishing. If Adams suffers from injuries or aging talent, it may force the coaching staff into making a choice, which is why Free needs to be ready.

How Free performs during this upcoming camp should give us all some feeling of direction about where the Cowboys’ future at left tackle is headed. The 6’6", 311-pound tackle out of N. Illinois is said to have good feet for a lineman, something NFL teams covet in left tackles. He’d have to be athletic to be able to do stuff like this in high school (from his DC.com bio):

As a defensive tackle in 2002, led the team to a 7-3 record and a playoff berth, recording 64 tackles, eight sacks, seven blocked kicks, six forced fumbles, five pass deflections, and two fumble recoveries.

Also had six receptions for 141 yards and a touchdown as a tight end.

Too bad the Cowboys are set at tight end. How about backup nose tackle? I kid.

Here’s what draft guru Mel Kiper said about Free:

I’ve always been very high on Doug Free. He is a tremendous physical specimen, is very light on his feet for his size, and an explosive run blocker. He has a chance to be a first or second rounder in the 2007 draft.

An explosive run blocker? You’ve got to like that!

I also like this 2008 Michael Lombardi quote on Free that Raf used in his New Year’s Day article, "Cowboys Autopsies: Offensive Line".

"If I were in Baltimore I might call Dallas and see if I could acquire one of its young offensive tackles. I would prefer 2007 fourth-round pick Doug Free, but doubt the Cowboys would trade him. Dallas is one of the few teams that has five very good offensive tackles."

Looking at the names on the Cowboys’ current roster, the tackle position now seems to lack someone with both experience and potential behind the starters. Sure, Leonard Davis can swing outside if really needed, but he excels at guard. Why mess with a good thing; and in the process, why create an even "Bigg"er-sized hole on the interior? Brewster is a rookie and more of a right tackle, and McQuistan is no lock to make the team.

Just imagine how solid the depth chart would look if Free were to step it up later this month in camp, and then show it in the preseason games. If he takes his development to the next level, the Cowboys would have a real 'swing' tackle, instead of the guard/tackle they had in McQuistan. Colombo would have a capable backup, and Adams would have a successor to groom. The Cowboys could have their left tackle of the future, and we will all be able to breathe a little easier about this upcoming season.

0 recs  |  Comment 66 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I will certainly be pulling for Free to be next in line.

It would sure save the team a lot of headache if Free can transition us smoothly out of the Flozell Adams era.

WELCOME HOME SEVEN!!

by Carl Shelton (GloryDayz88) on Jul 6, 2009 4:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

If Free develops into Flo’s heir apparent at LT, that would save the Cowboys either a boat load of money in FA or a very high draft pick investment at the position.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 6, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s extremely rare to see a top tier LT make it to free agency. Almost never happens – It almost happened with Jordan Gross this year year, but the Panthers got a deal done the day before free agency, but that was an anomaly.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 6, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's extremely rare for a top-tier anything to make it to free agency

The league’s elite players get locked up before they hit the market.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Jul 7, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would be real nice

iif we can actually hit on the one of the lineman we drafted before we send em away to start for another team…

i would love to see free mcq and brewster all show up in the next year(free,mcq) or two(brewster)

by CowboysFan4Life on Jul 6, 2009 4:19 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree

and realistically, if anything happens to Flo, Free needs to be ready or the season is hosed.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 5:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

I’m glad we’re letting them develop another year or two, rather than try and make a blockbuster trade for a solid LT. Promoting from within is almost always the right thing to do.

by Rickyy. on Jul 6, 2009 4:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If that's what they are doing

it would be great. And that’s what I’m hoping – that they didn’t go after linemen because they were (privately) happy with what they saw on the bench. Otherwise, it’s a HUGE risk…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have you ever seen Free dance?

The guy really does have quick feet – if he can defeat the bull-rush, he should be okay. He’s a good guy too. Best of luck, Doug.

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Jul 6, 2009 4:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes, we were cutting the rug together last week as a matter of fact

at the Texas State Fair.
His 2-step is great! Needs some work on swing dance. Being an Offensive Lineman paid off big in the Western Line Dancing though!

Did see him paired up with a larger woman once, and she was able to knock him off-balance with a bit of a bull rush, so I’m still reserving judgement.

by Realist Larry on Jul 6, 2009 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hilarious

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 7, 2009 6:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dance with who brung you
Did see him paired up with a larger woman once

Was she a big-boned gal from southern Alberta?

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jul 7, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In his only real action of the preseason last year,

he played a ton against MIN’s scrubs and got owned. It was not a very comforting image.

by Mandmeisterx on Jul 6, 2009 5:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

With the success the Pokes have had

at drafting the last couple of years, it really makes you scratch your head that they haven’t been able to draft an O-lineman. Of course, none of the draftees have really had a chance to play.

Free could break a curse here. The tough part is for us to find out if he’s a player, something bad has to happen on the O-line. Either injury or ineffectiveness. He’ll probably see action in a regular season game due to injury, and here’s to hoping if that happens he takes the job and never gives it back. I sure hope you’re right, Aaron. I hope Free is ready to break out.

Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.

Joe ThEEsman

by SB Six on Jul 6, 2009 6:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

With Flo's age and experience, and Columbo having settled in

I think Free and McQ should play tons during the Preseason, including opening games against starters.
They need to find out what those guys can do.

by Realist Larry on Jul 7, 2009 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has shown nothing to warrant this puff piece.

by burmafrd1944 on Jul 6, 2009 7:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well that was two birds with one stone

I take this piece to be all about that, actually – we’ve seen nothing at all from Free and yet the team elected to do virtually nothing in backing up LT. I find it an interesting topic considering how bad the left side was last season and what that cost the team…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 6, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I’m interested in what is going on with Doug Free. He looks like the front runner to at least backup Flo this season, if not be his eventual replacement. I’m sure we’ll read a lot about his performance in camp, and if he doesn’t look good, Dallas needs to go get a FA (like Kwame Harris) to be the swing tackle. IMO

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Jul 6, 2009 9:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure how you describe this piece as "puff" ...?

1st Paragraph = the team looks rather thin behind starters Flozell Adams and Marc Colombo

2nd Paragraph = Many of us know so little about Free

3rd Paragraph = Even though Free has shown potential in training camp and practice, the coaches must have felt more comfortable keeping McQuistan active last season…

Then… The question remains: Is Doug Free being groomed to eventually take over the starting left tackle job, or will he just be a career backup?

Another … How Free performs during this upcoming camp should give us all some feeling of direction

And finally …

IF Free were to step it up later this month in camp
IF he takes his development to the next level
… The Cowboys could have their left tackle of the future.

To me “puff” means myopic praise. I like this piece, as it merely raises the question about O-Line depth.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

He didn't read the article.

He just saw the headline and skimmed. It happens all the time.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jul 7, 2009 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I read the article and it puffed up a player who has done nothing. The title certainly did not help since any real fan already knew Free has done and shown nothing.

by burmafrd1944 on Jul 7, 2009 7:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't get that from it bro.

It just stated why he was drafted to begin with and that we need to see if he can live up to that.

It’s the offseason, things are slow.

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jul 7, 2009 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Puffed up a player?"

Wow, because other than two positive quotes from credible sources, most of the piece is more a question mark than a rosey answer. But hey, that’s your story and your sticking with it.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't know

the meaning of the phrase “puff piece.”

Stick with what you understand.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jul 7, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

he

meant to say “fluff”.

by blee on Jul 7, 2009 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

which makes me think of fluffer nutter

an excellent source of carbo’s

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 4:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

2010 Draftttt

say it or believe it a tackle will be takn in the first round. Just wondering y Jerry didnt draft Max Unger. Jerry knew he could have traded up from him ,they already filld out the draft card for him before the Seahawks took him. Jerry still should have wheel and deal this draft.
Any ways a tacke will b a issue to address next year regardless how these guys play. To b honest i have no idea y jerry drafted Brewster he must got some upside to him. From what i hear the guy is like two year away “a project”more the less like all the othr guards. could have used that pic on Brandon Tate or anothr DB or something. We will just see how thing work out.

by lostar2009 on Jul 6, 2009 8:40 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Maxxx

If JJ thought Max was worth takin in the 09 draft y didnt he take him. Y did jerry fill the card out but wantd Max to fall right on his lap wow jerry really. U knew u should have draftd up and got him. That would have ment one good guard, tackle, center on the roster the guy can play all 5 positions on the line. Now the c boys are in this mess right here who knows.

by lostar2009 on Jul 6, 2009 8:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

It’s like Gollum’s posting…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 7, 2009 6:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope the lack of OL depth isn't this year's Brad Johnson situation

Everyone except the coaching staff knew the Cowboys would have their pants down around their ankles if Romo went down and it cost them getting into the playoffs when it happened. I have the same feeling this year with the lack of OL depth. Adams was less than 50% last year because of injuries and Free never got a whiff at playing. There was nobody including McQ who could displace Proctor. Kosier still isn’t healthy less than a month from training camp and the reports last week weren’t good about Holland. After the collapse last year, this all makes me very nervous going into this year with essentially the same OL roster..

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 6, 2009 9:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

This is all true... and I also regret not getting Unger... but...

The draft is hardly an exact science. You cannot know every trade about to happen in front of you. You cannot jump up 3 spots every time you get excited. And Unger might turn out to be another Jacob Rogers… you just never know.

No NFL team boasts quality depth on their O-Line. Look at Jacksonville last year. Look at the Giants a few years back. And the Cowboys Line, while aging, is capable of at least another couple of years of solid play. They had a great 2007 until they collectively punted in that Giants playoff game. Then again, that Giants D also made the Patriots O-line look bad.

Just sayin.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 6, 2009 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't speaking just about the draft

Or Unger for that matter. I’m just talking about making roster moves to upgrade the overall talent and depth. Signing a serviceable backup would have been an example. Anyone drafted by the time the Cowboys could have picked would been unlikely to help much this year.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 7, 2009 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jared Gaither -- Ravens' new left tackle, is who the Cowboys should have picked

This monster kid, who’s about the same size as Flozell, was available in the supplemental draft the same year we picked Free. The Ravens got him for a 5th rounder — a total steal. Had we invested the same low-round pick in Gaither, we wouldn’t have had to re-up Flozell to a contract he’s probably not going to ever be worth.

Unlike Free, Gaither fits the Cowboys style of having huge linemen. I wanted this kid then, and he’s proved himself already.

by VAfan on Jul 6, 2009 11:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought the same thing at the time

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 7, 2009 6:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Robert Brewster, early 3rd round-will he be better than

James Marten
Doug Free
Pat McQuistan
EJ Whitley
Rob Pettiti
Jacob Rodgers
Stephen Peterman
Al Johnson
Justin Bates (who?) ?

But we did hit on
2002-Andre Gurode
What a list.
Thank goodness we lucked out w/Columbo.

by Realist Larry on Jul 7, 2009 12:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Can you make that happen this year?

I sure hope you’re right and it can’t happen quick enough. The bar isn’t set very high is it?

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 7, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you make that happen this year?

I hope you’re right. The bar isn’t set very high is it?

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 7, 2009 7:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Off topic, but hardly warranted a fanshot

BSPN SportsNation NFL Poll

ESPN, sensing the opportunity to kick the Boys when they’re down, is running an article and a poll (link is to the poll) asking whether the Cowboys deserve the title America’s Team.

Aside from the obvious smell of cow dung, what I liked the best was the question “which team is hated most?” I quickly voted for spy-gate Patriots, but they’re in a dead-heat with … you guessed it… OUR BELOVED BOYS!

The whole premise of the article reminds me of Maryland fans recently saying they were more relevant than the UNC Tar Heels in college hoops… 2 national titles shut that little whine up… now the Boys need to do the same and run the tables 3 of 4 years again. Steelers did 4 of 6 (?) … maybe we should go for 5 of 8. Hey, put Flo on roids, get Roy Williams back into Longhorn form… and anything’s possible? :P

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 12:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You should check out a podcast from DCfanatic

he covers this along with some other fans and it is pretty good.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/DCFanaticRadio

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Jul 7, 2009 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you read the articles / arguments for the other three "pretenders" ...

The whole thing sounds almost pathetic. ESPN gets to sell a head-line. 35% of the country’s voters hate the Boys… another 20+% luv em… that’s more than half their readers interested in pretty much any garbage they add the name Cowboys to and call journalism.

At least today, even the comment section here is higher quality than what ESPNs paid boys are producing.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 1:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most fanposts

are better than ESPN articles.

"Aw Shucks" - Wade Phillips

by MrMinority on Jul 7, 2009 1:41 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The best part is

It’s completely irrelevent what ESPN thinks (like most of what they report). The Dallas Cowboys ARE America’s Team. Have been and always will be. ESPN had nothing to do with it starting and is powerless to stop it. If you say “America’s Team”, 100% of the people know exactly who you’re talking about.

by StillHateTheGiants on Jul 7, 2009 7:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the fact that the Cowboys

lead in merchandise sales regarding NFL apparel speaks for itself regarding who America’s Team really is.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 7, 2009 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

People should get mad at NFL films

if they don’t like our nickname (best in the league according to NFLN). They are the ones who originated it, the media and fans just like it, so it stuck.

by DoomsdayD75 on Jul 7, 2009 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

it was weird, I... I mean you probably didn't hear about it because I went under the name of Mike Honcho. But I just wanted you to know that. If you can hear me, if it got into your brain somehow. That I spread my buttcheeks as Mike Honcho.

by AirforceBat on Jul 7, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

The biggest myth out there is that the name America’s Team was a self proclamation by the Cowboys.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 7, 2009 12:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 7, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

even ESPN doesn't REALLY want to see the name go away...

They butter their bread with ratings, and the Cowboys are the cream in that mix. Calling them “America’s Team” simply adds a little extra sump’n sump’n … fans love it, and the haters love to hate it… either way, people watch, and the media love it.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 8, 2009 5:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Cowboys are a huge draw for the WWL

and BSPN hates it so bad they can’t stand it. Berman leads the pack of Cowboy hatin’ wannabe’s. It doesn’t matter how many Super Bowls the Cowboys win, BSPN will always be like that jealous ex-girlfriend that lives her pathetic life just to stick a knife in your back.

I laugh my ass off at their hatred that they have to do a story a day on the Pokes. BSPN needs some serious competition that knows something besides how to produce sports soap operas.

We do, however, need more Super Bowls to shove down their throats, and more interviews like Romo gave the other night from Yankee Stadium, where he answered their question by calling them fabricators, and ignoring the drama queen’s question.

Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.

Joe ThEEsman

by SB Six on Jul 7, 2009 6:02 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't be surprised if Jerry takes a similar stance as Henry Ford: "good or bad ... as long as their talking about you"

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 7, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta disagree there (on Berman)...

Doeshe bring them up? Sure, but he rarely offers a scathing opinion on them. It’s the other guys (Tom Jackson, Keyshawn Johnson) that jump all over the Cowboys (but more specifically, Terrell Owens). And last year, I can’t say I really blame them. I mean… not to start a whole thing here, but was there a more disappointing team last year than the Cowboys?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Jul 7, 2009 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, plenty

the Browns go from playoff to embarrassment; the Giants fold at the end after being ueber-hyped all season; the Broncos, the Jags, the Chargers…

DalaiLuke’s point is a part of it. Jery loves him some limelight and probably doesn’t care all that much when he gets the backlash of unfulfilled promise. So some of it is the owner/GM. And some of it is that Dallas is a high-profile team. Philly is too and has caught it’s share of crap over the years.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 7, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to me

there wasn’t a more disappointing team, no sir.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jul 7, 2009 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Disappointing

I can see your point, but disappointment is in the eye of the beholder. If the Cowboys were expected to go 13-3 with all the injuries and the tough stretch schedule than yes, the Cowboys were disappointing. But when put in perspective, outside of the last game, were the Cowboys really that disappointing? The other losses were at Arizona (future SB participant), against Washington (hated rival), at Rams (without Romo), at Giants (without Romo), at Pittsburgh (SB champ), and against Baltimore (AFC championship game participant). Don’t get me wrong, the Rams and Eagles game killed me, but to say we were the most disappointing doesn’t really sit well with me. If we kept Romo and Felix the whole year and did the same, I could see that label fitting, but when you put things in perspective, I don’t feel that label is appropriate.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Jul 7, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree

Having key players go down to injuries is what was disappointing about the 2008 Cowboys because if Romo, Felix, Kosier and Newman are healthy all year, we make a deep run in the playoffs.

Fans in 2009 will see what having a healthy Cat will do for the offense.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 7, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How can you

subtract the last game and give an honest evaluation of the season? You can’t.

Yes, it was a bitterly disappointing year.

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Jul 7, 2009 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

because the last game wouldnt have mattered

if we hadn’t sustain all those injuries as we would have clinched a playoff spot well before that game.

Injuries simply devastated the team last season and the last game was simply a microcosm of the entire season.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 7, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The last game goes down as one of the most disappointing in Cowboys history... PERIOD

Injuries or not, you don’t come out against a hated division rival in a do-or-die — season on the line game, and just fold like a wet blanket.

Most disappointing season? Injuries are part of the game, but yes, it’s also right up there. We were 13-3 the year before. Half the media and most fans had us in the NFC Championship game or better. Injuries account for some but not all of the down-fall.

Describing the season as anything less than disappointing is to ignore the expectations going in.

Tar Heels = National Champs in Basketball ... #1 in Baseball ... Top 10 this year in Football?

by DalaiLuke on Jul 8, 2009 5:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

First Cowboys game I ever got up and walked away from before it ended. A completely pathetic performance.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Jul 8, 2009 7:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

when you're not a deep team

and lack depth at most positions, injuries can most certainly account for our disappointing season.

After crapping the bed against the Ravens, the performance against Philly didn’t really shock me.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jul 8, 2009 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mom_s_camera_081_small
A Special 'Thank You' to Grizz.
Small
Garrett DOES Have a Running Problem
Images_small
Playoff Chances: Week 10
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 11 - Final Edition
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Take The Edge Off

Recent FanPosts

Lil-00007305-sm_small
Cowboys Wide Receivers still having issues getting open
Barberbench_small
Someone who gets a pass and someone who doesn't (poll)
Villaronga_small
Theismann, head, hole in the ground ...
Small
Cowboys and Redskins at Dallas - A Look Back
Fox-jimmyjohnson_20_3
Are the Redskins the key to the division..?
Avatar_small
Mike Jenkins Bicep Treatment
Small
Anyone scared Watkins must play again...?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Pats Pulpit
Post Game Thread - Pats Over Jets 31-14
Cincy Jungle
Post-Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (7-3) 17 - Oakland Raiders 20 (3-7)
Gang Green Nation
R.I.P. 2009

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher