Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Doug Flutie's Hail Mary, And Why College Sports Matter

Cowboys Reach Agreement with Veteran Center Duke Preston

The big question on everybody's mind: What happens to Free Reign if Duke Preston beats out Cory Procter? Has anybody tested Preston's drumming skills?

More photos » by Matt Slocum - AP

The big question on everybody's mind: What happens to Free Reign if Duke Preston beats out Cory Procter? Has anybody tested Preston's drumming skills?

As you guys have already noted in the comments and in a FanPost - Hat Tip sublimezg, that's why this blog rocks, community participation - the Cowboys are adding veteran center Duke Preston to the roster. 

This is a serious challenge to Cory Procter and Montrae Holland. On the positive side, his name is Duke, so that's just cool in itself. Oh yeah, he's also started games in the NFL, on a regular basis for Buffalo. He's experienced. On the negative side is the fact that he's a free agent this late in preseason. There's usually a reason for that. He was with the Packers from March until this week. And I've read mixed reviews about his play.  

The Bills drafted him in the fourth-round in 2005, out of Illinois. He started the bulk of the games at center for Buffalo last year. For the Cowboys to go out and get him, they're obviously not comfortable with the current situation. Wade Phillips said that Holland will not be playing center after having trouble with the snaps this preseason. It feels like this signing is aimed directly at Procter, and that's a good thing. I don't think many of us have been impressed with his play. But Preston can also play guard, so Holland better make sure he's turning in a good performance or he could be the target.

Either way, I like getting some fresh blood in here to compete, and the fact he's a vet and has started before is a bonus. According to the National Football Post, Oakland and Cleveland were also interested but the ‘Boys won out.

Some Preston reviews below...

Star-divide

A couple of you found some stuff from other SB Nation blogs on Preston. A little bit in this Acme Packing Company post and a long rundown in this Buffalo Rumblings post. 

I checked in with Scouts, Inc. over at ESPN and they had this to say: 

Grade: Avg. Starter

Comment: Preston has seen more time as a starter in 2008 as a center and offensive guard. He has excellent size, strength and athleticism for an interior offensive lineman. He has natural power to anchor in the middle of the line as well as enough strength to get movement on double teams and power zone-blocking schemes in the running game. Preston is limited in space to connect with targets on the second level, but he's a solid technician who understands angles and combination-blocking schemes. He uses his hands well to gain leverage and does a nice job to lock on and stay connected, once engaged. He appears to have a good feel for the game and reacts well to stunts and twists. He was more aggressive in 2008 and is a versatile player who has value giving depth along the offensive line, but he's shown he can also be an effective starter.

We'll see what happens, but having someone else in the competition for the interior backup line was a smart move.

Here's an injury update.

0 recs  |  Comment 133 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

+1

In a time when quality players are not available, they did all right with this guy. He was cut from an offensive line that is playing extremely well. To be the odd man out in a talented group, he has to be given consideration.

Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, "where the heck is the ceiling?"

by White Wolf on Aug 27, 2009 6:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I thought they had a pretty good line and he was a numbers casualty.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 7:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know the same thing happened to my nephew last week end

He’s a landscper ( lawn boy) and he got into some poison ivy ( don’t know how, but I can see a weed eater throwing that juice every were). Anyway he got it on his llegs 1st but it did eventually almost close his eyes and he had to get a steroid dose pack to get rid of it.

by bad knees on Aug 27, 2009 2:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its in his eyes

Having one of his eyes swollen completely shut by a poison ivy infection is a little different then he can’t play because of a skin rash

by Trey, on Aug 27, 2009 5:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and why isn't anyone getting on his case

for playing in the woods during football season? lol.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ROTFL!!

Depends on the area where your swinging, sometimes a wedge is needed.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something tells me you wouldn't need a wedge with her

Aren’t wedges for tight places? I doubt that is a word that would be used to describe Jessica

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wedge or not

I’d play 18 holes with her

by sublimezg on Aug 27, 2009 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now I'm gonna be disappointed if I find out Carp was in the woods alone.

Who’d be the right one for Carp…?

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Aug 27, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or worse

Joe Buck was in town last week

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They should bring in Nate and Michael

Have big fella pick up the playbooks and let Mike deliver the news:
Isaiah Stanback, Corey Proctor, Patrick Watkins The Dallas Cowboys can NOT use you. You’re cut. You might play for somebody. But it won’t be the Cowboys.

And the Cowboys nation will rejoice at 3 of the most satisfying, long-coming cuts we’ve ever made.

by JimmyJohnson on Aug 27, 2009 2:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Great One..

well said. LMAO.

"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"

by SaratogaRacing on Aug 27, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That already happened this year.

Their names were T.O., Greg Ellis, and Roy Williams.

by DoomsdayD75 on Aug 27, 2009 11:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey he is at least bigger than both of them!

Probably not as fast as Proctor, or as slow as Holland. Bet he knows what a snap count is, and he is evedently heady and good with line calls.
One mans trash is another mans treasure and all that.

by bad knees on Aug 27, 2009 2:31 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL!

that’s freakin’ hilarious!!!

“ba-da-bum. thank you, thank you. here all week. three shows daily. and now for a blues number…”

Celebrity or Imposter?
YOU Decide...
http://www.xanga.com/metaltometal/689036052/celebrity-or-imposter/

by silverblue5 on Aug 27, 2009 6:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the signing

I read the review from the Bill’s blog as well as the others. His pass blocking results are not bad and anyone who holds up at the point of attack is a major upgrade from the three step drop play we had at LG last year.

We needed an average backup lineman to fill the spot for a year. It looks like we found one.

by Trey, on Aug 27, 2009 5:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Or even below average

That is still an improvement over laughing stock – which is what we had at LG last year.

by JimmyJohnson on Aug 27, 2009 6:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A link to articles relating to the Packers acquisition of Duke

http://ballhype.com/story/packers_agree_on_terms_with_ol_preston_add_depth_to_o/

I do not know if he has played tackle, but apparently the Packers so that as a possibility (in a pinch??). I also have read that there was no signing bonus, so it’s not surprising that Duke was the odd man out among the three centers on the Packers squad. He seems to be a versatile player, and hopefully one on the rise.

by DannyG on Aug 27, 2009 7:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

sorry

saw that, not so that

by DannyG on Aug 27, 2009 7:22 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

The Cowboys are trying to address a glaring problem. It’s a low risk move with a decent potential reward. If someone better becomes available then both Proctor and JabaHolland could be cut later.

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Takes a bit of the sting out of missing on Unger.

If he’s as good as that glowing scouting report, I don’t think the Pack would be cutting him… there must be some reason he’s available.

But… he looks to be an upgrade and that’s a sigh of relief.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Aug 27, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, kind of mixed reviews on him

Isn’t somewhat of a professional courtesey to release guys early if they’re vets and you know you’ll cut them in a few weeks anyways? Apparently GB is 3 deep at center and good across the OL in general. Maybe they were just doing the guy a favor.

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's not a bad signing

obviously a player available this late in the year is not going to be a superstar or good starter. but he is a veteran. has starting experience and is an upgrade for back up position. he can also play multiple positions which help.

by CowboysFanatic on Aug 27, 2009 8:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Scouts, Inc.

I’m taking anything that Scouts, Inc says with a grain of salt, especially after they rated Scandrick on the low end ’ ‘Good backup’.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/players/scouting?playerId=11366

by Diws on Aug 27, 2009 8:35 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

sounds pretty accurate to me
He has the explosive quickness and catch-up speed to be an effective coverage defender out on an island. He appears to be an aggressive player who is a solid open-field tackler. Scandrick needs to improve his reads and reactions to become more consistent leveraging receivers.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How pissed is Proctor

when he gets cut and joins another team and then finds out that Duke is a awesome drummer.

by sublimezg on Aug 27, 2009 8:36 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice pick up

Does anybody know if we can cut Proctor and not sustain a cap penalty?

by rlgiv on Aug 27, 2009 9:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I can't imagine there's much of a cap hit

Did he get a signing bonus? If not the only impact would be his salary compared to Duke’s

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Preston

I live in Buffalo Bills’ terittory, so I am somewhat familiar with Preston. He’s a solid guy. Nothing special.

He’s the definition of serviceable.

by Ridgelake on Aug 27, 2009 10:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

solid is all you want in a backup

someone who doesnt fling the ball over the head of the QB in the red zone and make you punch the guy next to you

Into video games? Check out GamersBeyond.com for reviews/vids on latest video games from all platforms (PC, PS3, xbox, Wii)

by fuji1232 on Aug 27, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i have to disagree with one thing.

the fact that his name is duke is not cool. i dont even feel comfortable typing that dirty word. i must go shower now.

by TARHEEL PAUL on Aug 27, 2009 10:47 AM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Paul, you think he said this because he knows our bball program?

If so, gotta give Still Hate some kudos …

And by the way, cheering for anything with the name Duke attached is just difficult.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Aug 27, 2009 1:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know I didn't even think of Duke Ellington

Couldn’t get John Wayne out of my head.

“i’m not going to hit ya. I’m not going to hit ya”……..Whammm!

“Circle the wagons…Little Missy’’

But maybe he’s just a “One-eyed, Fat” man?

by bad knees on Aug 27, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

On Lunch Break

they are talking about Nate Newton really liking Doug Free. One of those guys said Nate would not worry about Doug starting. Coming from an NFL lineman like Nate makes me feel real good about what I’ve been seeing. It just confirms what I thought.

Doug Free is the future left tackle in my opinion and I feel like he could start right now. I want to see just a little more but man I’m excited about his play.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 11:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

he's improved but has a long ways to go

before I’d feel comfortable starting him on a regular basis. Flo is clearly superior but if he goes down, I don’t think it would be a complete disaster to see him fill in for a game or two.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nate Newton whom I think knows more about linemen than all of us

thinks Free is the real deal, I should add “right now”,

and that is what I am seeing and have seen all the way into last pre season. The only thing missing is playing time and experience, the skills are there.

kind of reminds me of Romo and Bledsoe three years ago,except its Flo and Free. I have heard one scout in camp say he lacks strength but in pre season games he has no trouble run blocking. If Flo goes down the run game improves because of Free’s speed and quickness. Free does most things as well as Flo and some things much better, like blocking downfield and getting to linebackers. I was not ready to say it but since Nate did I will jump on that cart, Free is ready right now!

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bad comparison

Free might turn out to be a legit LT someday, but he won’t become a perennial pro bowler like Romo who is one of the best in the league at his position.

Flo when healthy and focused is still an elite LT, don’t kid yourself.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no its not,

You are so blinded by Romo you forget the debate that raged when it came time for him to start. And Romo is lucky to even be in the league, year three for him was going to be his last, until Quincy got into the snow and played. Remeber that year? the same year Free is in now? Romo was going to get cut, Free is farther along than Romo at that point in his career. So you might be right it may not be fair to compare Free is farther along a this point than Romo was.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't forget anything

I remember 2006 much better than you because I was in the start Romo corner. However, Free isn’t even close to being further along than Romo was in 2006, not even close.

Your delusional if you think Free could start this year and earn a trip to the pro bowl.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Romo didn't go to the pro bowl in that year did he?

Romo was an unknown at that point to most of us who was getting props from people in the know. I had to eat crow and I did, your turn is coming with Free.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

of course he did

obviously you’re the one with the memory problem.

It figures you ate crow with Romo, I knew he special the first time I saw him play, he had that “it” that can’t be seen or taught and he had it in spades.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who could see that coming?

Keep doing what you been doing, keep getting what you been getting.

by OskieOskie on Aug 27, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

also

if Flo struggles this regime is less likely to replace bad players than Parcells, but if flo struggles Free is the answer and he will take the job and not look back.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

Free will only start if Flo gets hurt.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Flo struggled because he was hurt

when healthy, he’s one of the best LT in the league.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree...

With Age i think Flo has slowed down..he can handle most good rushers..but needs help against the elite rushers of the league…the best LT’s in the league do not need that help. Having said that i do have a hard time believing anyone on this roster is a significant upgrade over Flo.

by thejanusman on Aug 27, 2009 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have you watched him yet this season?

I agreed with you until I saw him play this year. The dude looks like he’s declining fast. I HOPE we get just one more decent year out of him

by ChrisRichey on Aug 27, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its almost a guarantee

That Dallas will need Free at some point this year. I think Flo is very good but he’s getting older.

Having 3 supposedly mediocre offensive linemen for back ups (Free, Holland, possibly Duke) makes me feel a lot better about Dallas’s Oline depth than the travesty that was last year, and that year Flo’s knee went out

by AustonianAggie on Aug 27, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've watched Free as well

even more so than Flo because he’s had more reps than Flo.

I think he’s improved from last year, but like I said he has a long ways to go. He’s not a very strong blocker and gets over powered a lot.

I think his pass blocking is much better, but still needs work. I think he has a lot of potential, but still is very much a work in progress.

I think one more off season in the weight room should do the trick.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His pass blocking was never in question,

I agree and disagree at the same time. Huh?

Free has been bull rushed a couple times but I went back and watched Flo and guess what? the same thing by the same guy! not all the way into the QB like that one play but still that Hall guy was bringing it.

i thought it was his strength too but when the ball runs left he destroys his guy on almost every play. no problem with strength there, the one thing he does Flo has never done and will not do now is he has blocked the safety on three different occasions. Those five yard runs turn into 50 if you have a backside guy who can get to the second level with his agility. He has blasted a couple safeties this pre season.

I think his bull rush problem is more a bad technique or leverage, not strength alone.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bottom line

Free needs to get stronger

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 8:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he is ready too. Im sure that he would have a few growing pains

but he could deliver. My problem is Flo looks fit and he too has played at a high level against higher competition. I dont know if I would have the cajones to make the switch this year. I would also fear not getting Free some time to keep him from getting stale. I guess its the kinda problem you want but……

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

like I said before

let’s start Free the last preseason game against the Vikings. If he can handle their DEs, then I’ll buy what norm is trying to sell.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not just norm's opinion, but Nate Newton is also backing Free and Nate knows a little something about linemen

you know Nate is watching film and can make a good assessment.

Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!

by cowboy78 on Aug 27, 2009 1:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think he said who was better but just that Free is ready and the real deal.

I dont think that is a company line but rather his opinion. He has never had a problem ripping us before.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The good thing about all of this is at least we know what we have in Free.

A part of me wants to see him get some significant reps this year at LT. I want to be completely sold on him before we enter next years draft. If we have our LT of the future maybe we could go NT or DE. Canty gone and Spears last year of his deal we need some new young blood.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Free needs to play alot against the starters this week. Vikes wont show us anything.

I havent seen(watching other things more) Flo play badly this preseason. When I have watched he looks good and a bit quicker than last year.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cajones?

try stating an undrafted free agent instead of a QB in the top five all time in yardage. That is cojones!

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bledsoe was on the downside of his career

It wasn’t that big of a risk.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

never said he wasn't

but he’s a much better LT now than Bledsoe was a qb back then.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Terry, Terry, Terry,

just take a minute and look at your argument
Bledsoe<Flo now
Romo(three years ago)>Free (now)

Its the same scenario, an aged player with one ready to take his place if he falters. the heat is on, maybe Flo will respond better than Bledsoe, but he’s not looked like the Flo of old to me so far.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's because Flo was hurt last year

Flo has looked good to me this preseason.

I think it’s good if Free has developed enough to push him, but I also know difference between Flo and Free right now is huge compared to the difference between Romo and Bledsoe 3 years ago.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do agree Flo has looked good so far this year

He hasn’t played poorly enough to be replaced. I think he’s actually looked pretty good. Somebody has commented on his lack of conditioning, maybe that will come into play and allow Free to get onto the field without Flo being injured

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Save your breath Norm

You made the mistake of comparing favorably, anybody, in any way to Tony Romo. You now have a pit bull with his teeth firmly planted into your leg. That dog will not give up. Save yourself the frustration of trying logic.

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe if Flo stinks it up as much as Bledsoe did for 5 games.

Cajones would have been going with Romo at the start of the season.

However I really think BP did a good job of bringing Romo along and putting him in a situation where expectatiions were manageable. Romo struggled a little coming in mid game against the Giants(or was it Philly) but because of bledsoe 5 game stink up fans were more willing to let the young guy (Romo) have his growing pains.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I remember the groundswell of support for Romo really escalating a few games into 2006 mainly due to the very noticeable bad play of Bledsoe. By the time BP finally yanked Bledsoe out at half time of the Midgets game, it was definitely favored by the majority of fans.

I’m not seeing that yet with Flo vs Free. I do think that most fans are feeling comfortable that Free will be a capable backup this season, and that is another step forward for Doug.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Aug 27, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Bledsoe had a decent preseason that year

Parcells couldn’t have started Romo going into the regular season, he did it at about the right time, maybe a game or 2 late. Romo lit it up in preseason too

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would call it a pretty big risk......

because we were not losing very badly to NY when Parcells pulled Bledsoe for Romo. I thought he was crazy at the time. Everyone thought that this meant Parcells was giving up on this season because of this bold move. It turned out pretty good but everyone thought that Parcells was pulling the trigger a little early when he did it. No saying that I think Free should start in place of Flo, but just clarifying the beginning of Romo’s career.

by texstar on Aug 27, 2009 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought he waited too long

I was screaming for Romo a game or 2 earlier when it became obvious Bledsoe had lost his nerve. He was like a deer in the headlights his last few games.

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It wasn't that big a risk

Bledsoe was making bad decisions with the football, apparently had no internal clock telling him to throw the ball, and had no mobility at all. At least Romo was able to scramble and make plays when protection broke down. Bledsoe would stand there scanning the field for way too long while defenders were all over him.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Aug 27, 2009 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was firmly in Bledsoes corner until that pick against Philly on the goal line right before the half.

And then, POOF! I was over Bledsoe.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I might have to go back and look up the date and make it a personal holiday.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I laughed when I read this...

then I thought “hmmm… maybe I’ll do the same…”

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Aug 27, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was the breaking point for me too.

There had been quite a bit of support for Romo even in the exhibition season, but I thought we had a playoff team even with Drew, and changing QBs was a bad idea.

And then he threw that pick against Philly, and he was dead to me.

by DannyWhite on Aug 27, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not everyone texstar

I personally thought Parcells made the move because he wanted to save the season, and he did just that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not you Terry.......

but all the media went crazy and a lot of people thought that Parcells pulled the trigger too early. It’s easy to say, it was the right decision now, but if some people would be honest, they would have to admit it wasn’t a sure thing and it took a lot of guts for Parcells to pull the trigger. He knew what he had in Bledsoe, not so much in Romo at the time.

by texstar on Aug 27, 2009 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont know

I was on the boys blog back then and it was pretty close to 50/ 50 by the Giants game. On memeory I believe about 10-15% wanted Romo right out of the gate for the start of that season. After about every game that number was climbing.

I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. Thomas Jefferson

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't necessarily mean this blog but......

ya know how fans are once a QB starts struggling, they always want the backup in there. I can see it happening up in Philly this year easily if McNabb starts throwing up some ducks. I just think that people need to give Parcells credit because he took a pretty big chance on Romo. Maybe Bledsoe was struggling, but he knew what he had in Bledsoe. He sure didn’t know what he had in Romo and for him to make that move at half-time of a game that we still could have won, took a lot of courage IMO.

by texstar on Aug 27, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your right, BP doesnt get much credit and the haters of him will attack quickly.

So praise for BP is slim and when it does come its usually with a disclaimer.

Im mean, nasty, and tired. I eat constintino wire and piss napalm, and I can put a round through a flea's ass at 200 meters. So you go and hump someone else's leg mutt face, before i push yours in. Gunnery SGT Tom Highway

by squidlo97 on Aug 27, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heard that.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Aug 27, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

with Bleadsoe we had to go max protect on every play

TR’s mobility was getting free of shackles

by dcfanz on Aug 27, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

real courage would have been

to start Romo to begin the season which is what he should have done and I think he’d tell you that.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Aug 27, 2009 8:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Easy to say that in hindsight isn't it?

You don’t know what was going on anymore than anyone else at that point. It’s always a common occurence that everyone always wants the backup to start whenever the starter struggles. Look at Donovan McNabb last night. He throws an interception and now all the fans are booing him off the field wanting Michael Vick. It was a good move no question but to not give Parcells credit for pulling the trigger is ludicrous. He knew what he had in Bledsoe but not in Romo. Face it Terry, all Romo had up to that point was some flashy pre-season games. Big diference in pre-season and regular season.

by texstar on Aug 28, 2009 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you, Thank you JJ & Wade

They could stand to aquire one more OL backup but hey, this is great! I was wondering if they could find any talent off waivers for the OL. Let’s hope they can get this kid’s ass in gear like they did Holland. This could bode well for Dallas.

Now, if they could only find an OLB and a NT tree to pick from off waivers. Does any team have too many? Both these positions are a hard find.

by torchindefenses on Aug 27, 2009 1:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Reposting my own earler post

 
Save your breath Norm
You made the mistake of comparing favorably, anybody, in any way to Tony Romo. You now have a pit bull with his teeth firmly planted into your leg. That dog will not give up. Save yourself the frustration of trying logic.

by StillHateTheGiants on Aug 27, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1.....

I’ve tried in vain…..IT’S HOPELESS!!!!!!

by texstar on Aug 27, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The "average starter" description is enough for me to be stoked....

since we don’t currently have anyone like that an OL reserve. I am high on Free (that’s a fine-sound phrase, isn’t it), but even he doesn’t warrant a description like that, at least not right now (he would be more like a “Promising Reserve” description).
 
Pleasepleaseplease let this mean that Procter is gone.

by DannyWhite on Aug 27, 2009 2:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think they are just trying to churn the bottom of the roster...

Duke can come in and immediately compete with any of our backups at guard and center. Just means that Holland and McQuit-stan better be on notice.
Proctor might get physically beaten from time to time, but he’s dependable enough to put in there at C/G to keep the line going for the most part. Not the greatest back up, but he will do experience wise. Plus there seems to be some other rookies that have made an impression.
Holland is a waste of a donut. I don’t think he will hold up.

by rotovibe on Aug 27, 2009 3:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm undecided on Holland

he did pretty good when called on last year, he just got hurt to quick.

by Musiccitynorm on Aug 27, 2009 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really don't know. My first impression of him (over a few games last year) is that he is a wide body...

who really only has average skills.

I liken him to a cow.

It inflicts a lot of damage to a car because of its size – but in reality it got run over.
I’m not seeing much ability.

by rotovibe on Aug 27, 2009 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Procter is gone

McQ would probably be gone already if Brewster hadn’t been injured.

Holland better show he’s a better guard than Preston or he may be gone.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Aug 27, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since we reportedly beat OAK and CLE on signing Preston

Maybe Jerry can trade Procter for a 2010 7th.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Aug 27, 2009 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Preston is going to be the backup center, not guard.....

Holland is safe because he is the only good backup at guard we have and could start on alot of teams. I dont think they have any intentions of using Preston at guard. This move was clearly for depth at center.

by Boyzfan94 on Aug 28, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn that vid made me miss Terry Glenn

He and Owens could have their numbers removed and tossed into the middle of 100 receivers and I could still point them out just by the way they run and catch. Amazing..

by sublimezg on Aug 27, 2009 4:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Captain_small
NFL Power Rankins - Week 12 - Early Edition
09_bar-refaeli_08_small
Why a Win is Not a Win
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets As December Looms
Mom_s_camera_081_small
A Special 'Thank You' to Grizz.
Small
Garrett DOES Have a Running Problem

Recent FanPosts

Lil-00007305-sm_small
Oakland @ Dallas - A Trap Game if I ever saw one
Darren_woodson-the_real_hammer_2_small
What weaknesses do you see in this Pass Offense of ours?
Small
Remember...The only thing that matters is how we're playing heading into January.
Blue-koolaid_small
We've Got A Bully...It's Time To "Go Ralphie"
Small
Two Questions for Vela and Grizz
Small
New Captain Comeback?
Tom-landry-at_small
Is Cowboys' Close Victory Over Redskins Reason To Worry?
Small
Rossum cut

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher