Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Cowboys vs. Giants Preview, Part One

Divisional play gets under way when the Giants help Dallas open the new Cowboys Stadium.  In part one of my game breakdowns, I explore what the Cowboys defense needs, after its sloppy start in Tampa.

When the Giants Have the Ball

It's the irresistible force versus the seemingly moveable object.  The Giants bring Brandon Jacobs and their big bruiser running attack to face a Cowboys front that was gashed for over 170 yards in the opener against Tampa Bay.  As I pointed out in Wednesday's defensive breakdown, the inside linebackers had shaky games, blowing assignments and covering the wrong gaps.  Wade simplifed the calls mid-game and the front settled down, but the blown assignments recurred again late, leading to more big Bucs runs.

Star-divide

It's not the Giants way to line up and run directly at you, but if they feel you're soft up the gut, that's where they're going to go, because the strength of their offensive line is in the middle, where Pro Bowl center Shaun O'Hara is flanked by Rich Seubert and the superb Chris Snee

These three can all run and block on the fly and the Giants like to run traps, tosses and counters to the edges.  Snee is simply the best guard in the NFC and O'Hara's pulling skills are impressive. Not many teams ask their centers to lead sweeps. 

New York supplements the interior linemen's mobility with excellent blocking from the skill position.  TEs Kevin Boss and Darcy Johnson are not the most fleet guys, but they are devastating blockers, as is FB Madison Hedgecock.  They can seal OLBs and DEs and create the interior seam while the Giants guards pull from the backside.

Look for three plays the Giants like to run.  They run a modified version of the old Packers sweep where Hedgecock and the weakside guard will pull across the formation and try to get Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw running downhill.  The Cowboys ran this play a lot against San Francisco in the preseason and I don't doubt Jason Garrett cribbed this from Kevin Gilbride's playbook. 

New York also runs a lot of overload counters, where they put both tight ends on one side and pull a guard behind them.  The Giants also run an outside trap at outside linebackers, where O'Hara will pull and either kick out the 'backer or head upfield and look for a seal on the strong safety.

This matchup will turn on the Cowboys' linebackers' play.  Last year, they had a split decision.  New York ripped them for 200 ground yards in a blowout at the Meadowlands, but could muster only 72 total yards in the rematch.  When the Giants have won, they have moved the outside backers and kept the inside backers from getting effective pursuit.  Akin Ayodele's inability to handle the Giants perimeter runs is one reason he's in Miami.  Last year, the inside guys held for 20 minutes in New Jersey, then were rolled in the second half when their offense kept turning the ball over and they fell behind.

The big question this week falls on the inside backers, who were sloppy and disorganized in Tampa last week.  The Giants are a pure ball control offense.  They are high on second year wideout Mario Manningham and rookie Hakeem Nicks, who will miss this game with a sprained foot.  While they played well against Washington, the Giants didn't show any deep threats. 

Their passing game consisted mostly of spreading the field and throwing to Steve Smith between the yard markers.  They are likely to try the same, and to throw to tight end Boss, who isn't shifty but is very hard to tackle in the open field.

One tactic they will not carry over from the Redskins game is empty sets.  The Giants tackles give up a lot of sacks and left tackle David Diehl cannot handle Demarcus Ware without assistance.  New York left him alone last year and Ware went around him on the first pass for a sack.  He told the press that Diehl cannot cut off his speed and will edge rush if he ever sees a pure one-on-one.

Dallas sacked Eli Manning twelve times in last year's two games, and they have bad pass blocking matchups down the line.  In addition to the Diehl-Ware mismatch, they also need help inside, where Jay Ratliff pushed O'Hara around on passing downs.  He's playing the best nose tackle in the game right now, and he moved Bucs center Jeff Faine last week, though it was scarcely noticed because James and Brooking struggled so much behind him.

In the secondary, I look for Wade Phillips to run more of what we saw last December, in Dallas' 20-8 win. In that game, Terence Newman matched up against Domenik Hixon, the Giants lone deep threat.  Newman erased him and while Manning threw for 191 yards, he needed 35 attempts to do it.  That's a middling 5.4 yards per attempt, which mean a lot of short completion. 

Newman will likely draw Manningham, who scored New York's lone offensive touchdown last week.  If he can handle the youngster, the passing matchup will fall to Smith versus Orlando Scandrick, who will get the start on the right side this week.  Smith was the Giants slot receiver last year and Scandrick was Dallas' slot corner.  Smith got the better of their duels, grabbing several first downs and drawing a few penalties. 

Even if Smith gets his first downs and even if the Giants get their share of runs, the key for Dallas will be lane discipline and solid tackling.  If they don't let a five yard pass become a 30 yard score, as Washington did last week when Manningham took a quick hitch down the sideline against some atrocious Redskins' tackling, they'll keep the Giants to a reasonable score. 

The Giants receivers look promising but unless Manningham shows some Jerry Rice-skills that he hid last week, I don't see New York scoring at will, unless Dallas' linebackers continue to make assignment mistakes.  New York struggled to close drives last year after Plaxico Burress left their lineup.  Here are their offensive point totals in their last five divisional games (not counting special teams or defensive scores):

  • vs. Redskins -- 23 points
  • vs. Eagles -- 7 points
  • vs. Cowboys -- 6 points
  • vs. Eagles -- 9 points
  • vs. Redskins -- 16 points

See a trend here?  This is an offense that bogs down in the red zone and settles for field goals.  Last week New York had three red zone drives and netted six points.  Eli Manning is currently working with a blunt instrument.  The Giants can hammer you between the twenties, but they are having a lot of trouble finishing what they start.

Comment 65 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

1st

Shouldn’t it be an unstoppable force?

by D3R3K on Sep 17, 2009 3:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Brandon Jacobs

is far from irresistible. In fact, I find him highly annoying and repulsive.

by D3R3K on Sep 17, 2009 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Should be

I think he’s making a reference to their play against TB!

by Realist Larry on Sep 17, 2009 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice run-down

if you’ll pardon the pun.

Should be a tough game.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 17, 2009 3:24 PM CDT reply actions  

nice analysis

Sounds like eight in the box for Sunday

"What we've got here is failure to communicate"

by angie'sdad on Sep 17, 2009 3:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Throw out last year's games

On paper, especially given how easily the Bucs pushed our inside and outside linebackers around last week, it’s hard to see how we will shut down the Giants. Yet we usually have found a way to do it.

I’d throw both of last year’s games out the window. In the first one, the team knew we had no hope going into the game with Brad Johnson at QB. In the second, the Giants were already pretty much set as division champs, and played without Jacobs and Burress.

I like our chances in the game b/c Romo is 4-1 as a starter against the G-men. Plus, our new-look double TE attack is going to give them matchup problems. And they haven’t seen Felix Jones. In other words, we should win the scoring battle even if our D can’t shut down the Giants’ running game.

by VAfan on Sep 17, 2009 3:47 PM CDT reply actions  

The D has to be a concern

but I trust that Wade will have them ready against a team they know inside and out.

Maybe the biggest offensive plus over last season that no one is talking about is simply having Kosier back. Even in the game Dallas won last season, Romo got hammered.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 17, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

We don’t need to shut the Giants down, but cant give up the yards we did last week. I don’t really see them shutting down our offense so like you said, we can still outscore them if we need to, which we have shown we can do in past meetings with them. our offense is obviously new-look compared to last year and i think its a hard one to completely shut down. as long we protect romo we should be fine. it would be nice to see a good running game as well. im looking for felix and bennett to be game changers.

31 till I die

by FelixFanclub on Sep 17, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think you're right about not having to shut down the Giants,

but we do need to prevent them from sustaining long, clock-eating drives through the running game.

I’m sure we’ll see some quick strikes from our O, but I’d also like to see a little of that slow-ball game we saw in the preseason to give our D a blow, keep ’em fresh, and keep the Gints O off the field.

Turnovers are always important but could be a real key to this game.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 17, 2009 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

man what I would give to win this game easily and with no pain.......

Score at will on them, win 41 – 6 and leave Jacobs with broken teeth looking like Strahan…I know i’ve said a million times….

by ManTab on Sep 17, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I wonder how often we'll see a four-man front from the Cowboys

and whether it would help with the squishy middle of our LB corps against the run.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 17, 2009 4:11 PM CDT reply actions  

We can't have our CBs, taking on Jacobs!

Expect them to stack the box a lot! Hope our DB can hold there own, they should be able to. Biggest weakness would be Carp/Sensi on Boss. You heard it hear 1st!

by bad knees on Sep 17, 2009 4:15 PM CDT reply actions  

i think we definitely dont want to play their game (see 2007 playoffs)

as VA fan said – throw out last years games…not much can be referenced from those 2 games

i’m not saying that we can’t stop the run…i just think our best chance is to come out throwing and keep them off balance with screens etc to Felix

if we get the lead and they abandon the run – they’ve got no shot

if they get the lead – they wont be able to run away…we can keep it close if it turns into a track meet

by McLovin9 on Sep 17, 2009 4:20 PM CDT reply actions  

agree.......

if we play the grind it out game like (playoffs) I’m afraid we’ll lose. That’s exactly the kind of ugly game that the Giants want to play. Basically, you let them hang around and they’ll end up beating you at the end.

by texstar on Sep 17, 2009 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

I see your point, but

I’m not suggesting slow-ball should be our first option (like it was in the playoff loss). And I don’t think it will be. But I do think time of possession is going to be huge in this game.

If we rely only on a quick scoring offense.our front seven will be worn down—has anyone mentioned our LB depth issues? ;-) as a result.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 17, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

true.........

time of possession is definitely desired. If you are going play possession type football, you need to score 7 points pretty much every time you have the ball because our defense will not be able to hold up. What killed us in the playoffs was we had these long drives but the Giants had these quick strike TD’s. We pretty much cut our own throats because we ate up all the time on the clock but we didn’t score points every time.

by texstar on Sep 17, 2009 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

If our concern is our run defense...

…and after that last week, that certainly seems to be the case, then this game is the perfect measuring stick.

I still enjoy beating the Eagles the most. I despise them. But the Giants are #2 right now, with Jacobs making an admirable push to become #1. Should be a hard fought game on both sides, I’m sure everyone will be fired up.

One thing that makes me optimistic is Romo’s track record in Sunday night games and night games in general— for whatever reason, he plays exceptionally well in prime time and his career record and stats are remarkable in night games, even when you factor in the MNF abomination in Buffalo.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 17, 2009 4:23 PM CDT reply actions  

he's huge in prime time...and the 'Boys are huge in home openers too....and Romo is huge Sept-Nov

all the technicals point to dallas

and 100,000 screaming fans should get things pumped up too

if i see the gmen D’line doing their ’ballin free throw routine or Jacobs throwing balls at the play clock i am going to vomit

this game is going to be huge for morale….can you have a must win game in september??…maybe not…but if you can – then this would be it

by McLovin9 on Sep 17, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1000

I wish that Wade would re-play Jacobs play clock incident for the guys. I had to sit thru that little smart alek’s demonstration two years ago and it made me sick. Remember how they kept re-playing it? Hopefully, this will fire the guys up. He can’t do that in our house.

by texstar on Sep 17, 2009 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Another thing to keep in mind

This rivalry has become toxic over the last few years and there has been one constant. If we frustrate the G-ant, they WILL commit stupid penalties…. usually the 15-yard unsportsman like variety.

I’d say we will commit stupid penalties in this game if we get frustrated, but we seem to commit those regardless.

by Road Warrior on Sep 17, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’ll also be interested to see Part 2 of the preview and get people’s takes on how the loss of Aaron Ross will affect our passing match-ups. I have never heard of the Giants’ nickel corner if Ross is out (I literally cannot even remember his name right now, Matt Moseley mentioned it yesterday), but have been told that there is not a huge drop off.

And of course I will be interested to see if Osi is really “back” or if he’s still the same overrated DE that I remember getting erased by Flozell twice a year and racking up 50% of his “Pro Bowl” stats against Winston Justice.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 17, 2009 4:25 PM CDT reply actions  

there may not be a drop off from #2 to #3

but surely there is from #3 to #4 CB on the giants roster

by AustonianAggie on Sep 17, 2009 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Corey Webster is their best CB

was last year. I’m sure they would love to have Ross out there, but the other guys are not scrubs.

by Rafael Vela on Sep 17, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

isnt thier nickel corner

Now a 2nd year undrafted free agent?
Mosley acts like they are all flippin pro bowlers, but irvin and kiley said the guy was something to hide. Quite honestly roy is a mismatch for all their cbs because he’s so much bigger than they are.

Defense
Do you think we could see some of that 46 package we used to use w burnette? If bradie can’t seem to disengage maybe that’s an alternative.
 Maybe we can use a monster front on first down
Spears siavii olshansky ratliff

Spencer ware brooking

Scandrick hamlin sensi newman

I know sounds crazy but I bet that would be very hard to run on, problem is if they pass we take out our best rushers and put our normal olbs in coverage.

by TONYINCC on Sep 17, 2009 7:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Quite honestly roy is a mismatch for all their cbs because he’s so much bigger than they are.

Kitna told Romo nobody runs a better post than Roy. He might have a huge game this Sun

by fretman on Sep 17, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually if Dockery AND Ross are out

our nickel corner is a FIRST year undrafted rookie free agent. However he did beat out two drafted CB’s in camp, and held his own last week (although no one will mistake the Redskins putrid passing attack for the Cowboys’). We’d love Ross for the depth, but there was speculation that Terrel Thomas might have beaten him in camp for the starting job, even if the fight had been straight up with no injuries.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Sep 17, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

He called a damn good game against Washington

The players even gave him a “mock” gatorade shower after the game. He’s listened to them on certain issues, such as moving to the sidelines from his preferred box because AP asked him to be there. The players like him, and already he’s off to a better start than Spags did! I’m not trying to compare him to Spags already, but it was promising. The single concern I had with playcalling all game was the prevent D that allowed the Skins their only offensive TD late, and made the game closer than necessary. The only defensive concern we really have is our injury report. That makes me feel ill.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Sep 19, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

the Giants’ defense looked fine to me. Obviously injuries may play a role, but play calling is fine.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 19, 2009 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's looking like a potential disaster for the Giants' secondary

with injuries to starting corners Aaron Ross and Kevin Dockery, and to our best safety (IMO) Kenny Phillips, and safety Michael Johnson, who had a good game against Washington.
There’ is some potential here for Romo to torch the Giants in this game.
(That said, I’m picking the Giants, 471-3)

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Sep 18, 2009 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Canty

will miss the game

Link

Sugar ... water .... and, of course, purple.

by Dub_TC on Sep 17, 2009 4:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Are we so sure that the Giants' O-line is that much better than Tampa's?

Because I was pretty impressed with the Bucs O-line, and I think that at the end of the year that will be considered one of the league’s stronger rushing attacks.

by DannyWhite on Sep 17, 2009 4:50 PM CDT reply actions  

no

I don’t think anyone can say that for sure right now.

by foyesboys on Sep 17, 2009 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Based on past performance over a couple of years I would say so.

they’ve proven it for a few years now.
I don’t know what that was in TB!

by Realist Larry on Sep 17, 2009 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Past performance doesn't completely answer the original question.

It shows that the Giants O Line is probably legitimately good, but only continued play will show how good Tampa’s O Line is…who knows, maybe at seasons end, Tampa may be considered one of the best in the league.

by CaliFanInTx on Sep 17, 2009 10:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was over at giants.com this morning and noticed that their weekly show picked the cowboys to win.

Looks like they have a weekly show on there talking about the past week and upcoming opponents. They seems to be wary of the Giants win and thought the Cowboys offense was going to be the difference in this game…

by CaliFanInTx on Sep 17, 2009 5:03 PM CDT reply actions  

thats pretty much how i see it

I see Romo and the deep ball winning this one. Unfortunately games don’t play out like this at the end of the year like they do at the begining

by AustonianAggie on Sep 17, 2009 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

the key is to score early and make them abandon the run, than

our D will be lights out against the pass and we can have as many long drives as we wish to eat up the clock. More importantly, how about some scores on turnovers, Int returned for six or fumble returned for six, that would be gravy and it will take some pressure off Romo. Right now everybody is expecting all the scoring to come from our offence.

by dcfanz on Sep 17, 2009 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Local newspaper too

they seem to giving the boys a lotta respect. Its Thurs and I’m gettin stoked! Play some solid D and we be lookin good.

by fretman on Sep 17, 2009 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

if romo trows for 3-4 tds..

then their running game will be just clock wasting because Eli without burress is pathetic at least…so i say we open up with some play action and get an early lead then Jacobs can run all he wants…..but eventually they’ll have to throw and that’s when wades at his best..

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 17, 2009 8:04 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah he was pathetic last week

Only 69% completion rate? How will he ever win another game?

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Sep 17, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree with Eli being pathetic...he's a proven winner that can manage the game and throw to move the chains...

but I think the point hashish wash trying to make was that it would not be an advantage to get in a shootout with Romo or the Cowboys. You can have 80% completion rate, but if all you have to show for it is 1 touchdown and a pick then that doesn’t show me you can put up big numbers. The Giants preference has to be that they turn this game into a low scoring defensive battle…

by CaliFanInTx on Sep 17, 2009 11:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

The TD total

was affected by the playcalling. They didn’t attempt a single pass into the endzone, in any of their red zone trips. That has been a source of contention amongst Giants fans. We can march up and down the field all day, but seem to fall apart in the zone. Some say playcalling, some say execution of the plays that are called. But to say Eli is pathetic without Burress is to blatantly ignore every meaningful statistic from last year’s games (except win/loss of course, but there are more factors that go into that number).

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Sep 19, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Actually, "I" didn't call Eli "pathetic" and was actually defending him...

But Eli is not Peyton. Eli is best when he is a game manager. That’s not saying he can’t throw it down the field, but he is best when he is methodical. His career stats prove that out…

by CaliFanInTx on Sep 19, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eli without Burress

Just a thought …

The consensus here is that we are pretty happy with our receiving corps without T.O., and the first game confirms that. Also, I believe part of Jerry’s publicly stated rationale in letting T.O. go was his own and the coaches’ faith in the other receivers.

We can say what we want about the Giants, but they remain a very well run franchise. In addition to losing Burress, they also let Toomer go, and they did not go out any buy any FA WRs (Matt Jones anyone?) – most likely for a similar reason to our own WR move: Faith in their own talent.

I will not underestimate the Giant WRs if for no other reason than their situation is eerily similar to ours.

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 18, 2009 4:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Giants have shown they can evaluate talent and probably have a good set of WR's...

but the weak link is Eli…he needs to have that tall receiver that he can just lob it up to and know that he can get it…Barden is the guy who the Giants think may be that guy, but he’s still very unpolished…

by CaliFanInTx on Sep 18, 2009 4:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Eli is alright

And the Giants know that to get the most out their Draft investment in WRs they have to get the WRs playing. That said I think right now, their WRs are behind. Maybe in 2 months they will be on the level but not yet.

For the Giants its not about replacing Plaxico with Hixon in Septemeber, which is failing, its about replacing Plaxico in December, which may yet work out

by AustonianAggie on Sep 18, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Look at the career reception totals of our WR corps vs. there's

Our situation’s are hardly eerily similar. The Dallas WRs, particularly if you include both teams’ TEs, are significantly more experienced, with the big difference being at the #1 spot on both teams.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 18, 2009 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

subject..

their running game wont matter

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 17, 2009 8:06 PM CDT reply actions  

trippy man just plain trippy

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 17, 2009 8:08 PM CDT reply actions  

just read that the roof on the stadium will be open for the game

on a seperate note how about we put a star on the roof, it will look spectacular

by dcfanz on Sep 17, 2009 8:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Tackling

I simply cannot understand why we do not practice the art of tackling more. It is like any other aspect of the game and to not practice it, is an invitation to a lost. I understand the price of the players and the risk of injury, but what I see sometimes from our guys is atrocious. I think we will win Sunday, but then this is not the game I would worry about, that game will be the one played in New York.

Ahab the Arab
He who wants to find something wrong will always find what they are looking for.

by damnarab2 on Sep 17, 2009 8:58 PM CDT reply actions  

Brandon and Osi

These dudes are getting all the attention, but the dudes I sweat are bradshaw and tuck.

brandon may break a run for 15 or two. If bradshaw gets loose, he might just break one for 60.

FLo has some experience w/osi. he has done well against him. that guy tuck though, watch out.

I feel the same way as last week, though I think it’ll be more close this time:

if the boys dont turn it over, they win.

by THEjarhead on Sep 17, 2009 11:12 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm pretty sure the crowd will be a huge factor

100,000+ should be pretty intimidating for the Gmen. I think our offense continues to fire on all cylinders and the D improves over last week.

Epic Fail since 1985

by the red scare on Sep 17, 2009 11:39 PM CDT reply actions  

They were saying on PTI today

that we were strugling to sell this game out. Is that right?

The Knights season may have just ended, but the Cowboys year is just begining!

by aussie_cowboy on Sep 18, 2009 6:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

No

The Cowboys released 1,500 additional tickets monday. The tickets that matter were already sold out, but they made available previously unavailable tickets

by AustonianAggie on Sep 18, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

most of these Tix are in the party-room foyeurs

by AustonianAggie on Sep 18, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Tuck

I was at a drugstore the other day and the woman in front of me at the check out counter was buying a jar full of something called TUCKS. You wouldn’t believe what she said she does with ‘em. Now I’m hearing about this Nu Yawk Gnat Defensive END named Tuck and what a pain in the … well, it just doesn’t make sense! GO COWBOYS!

by Michael T on Sep 18, 2009 3:17 AM CDT reply actions  

Pierce will be the bunny this week

While he is the heart of the Giants D – he is terrible in coverage. With the versatility we have on O there is no way they will be able to protect him.

Imagine him matched against any of our TE’s – or Felix!

by Boy from Oz on Sep 18, 2009 3:27 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys 2012 Defensive-Fronts
Small
Simplicity, and execution... The keys to the top offense of the last Decade...
Tn48_small
Building a Defense: The Case for Morris Claiborne
Kegbearer_small
Aikman, Irvin & Emmitt Interview

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn