Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Strapping Up Against Yourself: Cowboys vs. Panthers Preview, Part I

Two teams with high expectations and flat starts square off Monday Night when the Cowboys play the Panthers. Dallas is trying to avoid a 1-2 start after a very sloppy start by it's defense.  The Panthers would be 0-3 if they dropped this contest.  They've had a roller coaster history under John Fox (their win totals the past few years have been 7-11-7-11-8-7 and 12).

Carolina seems to either improve four games or decline four games a season.  They tied for the NFC's best record last year at 12-4 and are probably already experiencing some bad deja-va.  It's Dallas' job to maroon them in that funk.

When Dallas Has the Ball

Two games, two 30+ outputs.  Jason Garrett has ripped opponents through the air and on the ground.  In week one, Tampa Bay walked corners to the line and run and pass blitzed them from the slots. Garrett motioned his receivers and tight ends into mismatches and Tony Romo threw three long TD passes.

Star-divide

Last week, Giants coordinator Bill Sheridan game-planned to prevent the big pass.  He often deployed free safety Kenny Phillips 25 yards deep, in a centerfielder role.  (This is something the Ravens do a lot with Ed Reed.)  The Giants manned up on the Dallas receivers and flexed tight ends and played a lot of shallow zones with their linebackers. 

New York subsequently played a lot of ten man football near the line of scrimmage. The plan frustrated Dallas' passing game but gave the Cowboys favorable numbers against the run.  The Dallas runners combined for 251 yards on the ground against a Giants line touted as the conference's best.

Which tactic will the Panthers pick?  Dallas is a two-dimensional offense.  Will Carolina approach the game as the Bucs did, trying to slow the run, or will they play a deep safety or halo two-deep, hoping to contain the run and to get some Romo picks along the way?

If the Atlanta game is any indication, we'll see a more run-first approach.  The Falcons were a very effective running team last year, using Michael Turner as their hammer and Jerious Norwood as the speedy changeup.  They had good games against the Panthers and last week, Carolina tried to slow the Atlanta rush, while trusting its secondary to keep Matt Ryan under some semblance of control.

Jason the Cribber

The Panthers did a fairly effective job. They outgained Atlanta by nearly a hundred yards and kept Turner's yards per attempt to a very respectable total. That said, they're coming to Cowboys Stadium underhanded.  The Panthers have always been a one-tier team, in that they've had great starters in their better years, but no bench.  In '09, they're frayed at some spots on their defensive eleven.  They lost starting DT Ma'ake Kemoeatu in the pre-season and lost replacement Louis Leonard to a broken ankle in the final minute of last week's game.

When healthy, Carolina runs a 4-3 with big tackles and quick ends and linebackers.  It's not that far removed from the scheme Dallas ran in the '90s.  With its thin DT corps, the Carolina middle looks inviting.   Look for Dallas to attack it with a play Jason Garrett cribbed from the Falcons, and used against New York last week to great effect. It's an inside counter from an I-formation.  The NFL Network ran a profile of this play last week while highlighting Atlanta's running game.  The game tape, coincidentally, showed it being run very effectively against the Panthers.

Sunday night, Dallas ran the play out of its two-TE, two-back package.  Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett are put on each end of the line, giving a balanced look.  At the snap, both backs step one way, in this case right, to draw the New York front in that direction.  The Dallas linemen then help the defense in the direction they are already slanting. If Witten gets a solid seal on the backside, as he did on this play, a huge cutback lane is created:

(hat tip to Bob Sturn of D Magazine's Inside Corner and to his assistant Brian for creating the graphics and clip)

The Cowboys have not been a particularly good inside running team in recent years, so their success with this play and other isolations against New York are particularly encouraging.

When Dallas does pass, look for them to look for the tight ends, who Garrett hopes to engage in the play action up-and-down progress.

Also look for Dallas to target CB Chris Gamble. He had one of the worst, if not the worst YPAs or any starting corner from 2004 through 2007.  He picked his play way up last season and the Panthers rewarded him with a big extension while cutting Ken Lucas, who had been very consistent on the other edge.  Lucas' job was handed to Richard Marshall.

As the story title implies, there are several similarities between these teams besides their sluggish starts.  The Panthers have one monster rusher, RE Julius Peppers, and little else.  Peppers bagged 14.5 of Carolina's 37 sacks last year.  Rookie end Charles Johnson added six and the rest were scattered among the remainder of Carolina's defensive roster.

If the Cowboys front can neutralize Peppers, Romo should have time to pass.  The Falcons' Sam Baker kept Peppers quiet last week and it helped Matt Ryan have a big day.  Dallas has yet to allow a sack, so I don't expect a lot of pressure from Carolina unless it blitzes.  The Panthers don't like to do that, and if they do, Romo will get more matchups of the type he got against Tampa Bay.

Comment 112 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Come on boys

Big diffence between 1-2 and2-1

by xtremeyouth1 on Sep 24, 2009 5:04 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Look on the bright side

If you lose, you will be tied with a team that went 12-4 last year ;)

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 24, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great as alway Raf,

And I love that video which begins with the X’s and O’s before it shows the “Live Play” – very cool.

I expect that Romo picks apart the secondary AND that Barber, Jones, and Choice have a big day running.

I’m lickin’ my chops and can’t wait for Monday Night.

by BishopWest on Sep 24, 2009 5:44 PM CDT reply actions  

That was cool

Anybody else notice how Felix Jones was ten yards past Deon Anderson before Deon blocked anyone? It was not Andersen’s fault, Felix saw the hole and just accelerated

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Sep 24, 2009 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Felix

doesn’t even look that fast to me when you see him play but next thing you know guys trying to tackle him look slow and out of position.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

not to play a spoiler, but Romo was supposedly going to rip apart Giants's secondary aswell

heaving said that I wouldnt mind heavy dose of running and screens and draws. Than if we have a good lead let Romo take its chances

by dcfanz on Sep 24, 2009 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damm thats a bummer. I liked him coming out of Miami and wanted him.

If thats the case then another good call by our draft team.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Sep 24, 2009 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am

But they’re too good of a team to lose a game like that. I think they’ll get a scare but prevail.

Of course, it’s always sweet to see the Giants fall.

Everything's looking up, Milhouse!

by accidental innuendo on Sep 24, 2009 8:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

Giants should kill them.

by kindablue on Sep 24, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

if tampa bay is any good at all, it should be

the giants defense is completely injured right now…Alford, Phillips for the year. Tuck, Bernard, Canty are all hurt…If Tampa bay is as good as I think they are (7 wins or so), Tampa should give them a fight.

by foyesboys on Sep 24, 2009 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

TB is not heathy now either

Cadillac is already wearing out, Bryant has missed time with knee problems, and the FS J. Phillips is on IR.
I guess playing Dallas takes a toll on their opponents :)

So it begins...

by APerfectStar on Sep 26, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

wow

That’s actually kind of sad. I never want to see anything like that.

by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Sep 24, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

he’s really a talentd guy. What a shame.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agree

Something I read was talking about how arthritic the knee is already. He will almost certainly have a short career.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 1:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

After that play, a couple of my friends said

“Oh he ain’t that fast.” Child please.

Felix had to slow down a little to make the cut while both corners were going full speed the entire time AND they had an angle.

by JBell523 on Sep 24, 2009 6:12 PM CDT reply actions  

not so sure

you make a good point about the cutback but I think that quad might be a little sore. Last year he takes that to the house

by fretman on Sep 24, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

His acceleration was great

And that’s the more important thing for a RB.

Felix’s top speed did not seem to be exactly Chris Johnson level when those CBs caught up to him, but that’s not surprising— Felix’s 40 time was only like a 4.4, right? Closer to a young Clinton Portis or DeAngelo Williams. Certainly fast, but not “blow your doors off” fast like Johnson.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 24, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I loved the way he protected the ball

He really seems like a great kid who just wants to get better. After his careless fumble on the kickoff there was no way he was fumbling this one. I wish all of Dallas’ players showed that same desire and ability to address their weaknesses.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think...

Stewart is just as dangerous as Williams. We’ll be in for test this week. Desperate team that knows they can’t go 0-3 or their season is over.

We’d better bring our A-game!

by Road Warrior on Sep 24, 2009 6:49 PM CDT reply actions  

yep, desperate teams are most dangerous,

if they fall 0-3 there is no tomorrow for the Panters, we better correct the issues on defense otherwise another 30 pts by offence still will not gonna cut it.

by dcfanz on Sep 24, 2009 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Stewart is a monster, but Williams is way better

Williams topped all RBs last year. He led the league in TDs last year! He tied Jim Brown’s record for 30+ yard runs in a season. He had 250 total yards less than AP, but also had 90 less carries! He led all top RBs with a wopping 5.5 yards per carry. Most importantly he had 0 fumbles.

Your defense can do everything right, and Williams will still burn you for 30 yards. Don’t take him lightly.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 24, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Romo's Potential

As a military guy,

We use the word “potential” for our junior guys as a positive matrix… capacity to do well.. As the folks become more senior in rank, using the word potential is the evaluation reports is a kiss of death.. Meaning potential must be achieved by the time one has had enough time in rank to develope them into reality.. Saying Romo has potential after so many years is a bad sign, that the guy just doesn’t get it!!! Especially since he is already 29 years old.

by CDR on Sep 24, 2009 6:50 PM CDT reply actions  

...

he had an MVP caliber season in ‘07. That’s his potential.

by DoomsdayD75 on Sep 24, 2009 8:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

he can do better

I mean just elimate 60% of th B.S. throws and it will make that much of an improvement. I know sometimes u overthrow open people but gosh throwing pics and bad throws always bother me.

by lostar2009 on Sep 24, 2009 8:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

When he still had Big Bill's list of "things that make a great quarterback"

He’s forgotten half that stuff now. To his detriment unfortunately.

"We'll see." --Bill Parcells

by Uncle Angus on Sep 25, 2009 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Proven many times over the years

that you don’t need a great quarterback to win championships, you need smart quarterbacks that takes care of the football and makes better decisions with the football on the field, thus far Tony hasn’t shown that aspect of his game on a regular basis, especially in big games.

I really do think Tony Misses Bill Parcells in his ear about making those better decisions on the field.

Turnover Tony - BIG IN NAME, NO BIG GAME.
Deke - I thought Romo had regressed last year as a quarterback, Poor Mechaniics,Poor decsions, Poor Throws. His game and numbers just don't lie. Tony has to get it in his head, that he has to take better care of the football and make better decisions on the field if he wants to be an elite Quarterback. He has the tools, he just has to put it all together.
Aikman on Romo - When the games are close, you have to be smart with the football and that has been a problem with Tony.
JJT - by the numbers - In Romo's first 23 games as a starter, he was 17-6 with 50 touchdown passes, 24 interceptions and a 101.7 passer rating. When that stretch ended in 2007, the Cowboys were 12-1 and en route to earning the NFC's top playoff seed.
Since then, Romo is 11-9 as a starter with 34 touchdowns, 23 interceptions and a 85.0 passer rating.
The guy from the first 23 starts can lead the Cowboys to a championship; the guy from the last 20 starts can't.

by Deke on Sep 25, 2009 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Deke you should include losers like

Ware, Flozell, Newman, Barber, James, Witten and others in your signature line. They all contributed to those nine losses as well. Out of those 9 losses, I’d say Romo is directly responsible for three.

by DavidH22 on Sep 25, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

that's only if the smart qb has a great defense and running game

neither of which Romo has had so far in his career. I personally think he takes too many risks for that reason.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

This defense has issues of not making the big stops when needed, they are soft and overrated IMO

but when your quarterback turns the ball over three times in a game and your special teams coughs another one up leaving your defense on the field three more series in a game, don’t then expect them at the end of the game to man up and make a big stop when they were put in the position they were put in because the poor decisions and throws made by your quarterback.

In December, this defense played well enough last year, and they did lead the league in sacks and got pressure, the quarterbacks poor decisions and play was the reason they lost to the Ravens, Pittsburgh, Philly and now that same poor play has shown up early against the giants this year.

I don’t want to hear Tony talk about making better decisions after he gives games away time and time again, I hear it all offseason. it’s time for him to practice what he’s been preaching and just do it,

Turnover Tony - BIG IN NAME, NO BIG GAME.
Deke - I thought Romo had regressed last year as a quarterback, Poor Mechaniics,Poor decsions, Poor Throws. His game and numbers just don't lie. Tony has to get it in his head, that he has to take better care of the football and make better decisions on the field if he wants to be an elite Quarterback. He has the tools, he just has to put it all together.
Aikman on Romo - When the games are close, you have to be smart with the football and that has been a problem with Tony.
JJT - by the numbers - In Romo's first 23 games as a starter, he was 17-6 with 50 touchdown passes, 24 interceptions and a 101.7 passer rating. When that stretch ended in 2007, the Cowboys were 12-1 and en route to earning the NFC's top playoff seed.
Since then, Romo is 11-9 as a starter with 34 touchdowns, 23 interceptions and a 85.0 passer rating.
The guy from the first 23 starts can lead the Cowboys to a championship; the guy from the last 20 starts can't.

by Deke on Sep 25, 2009 10:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree he lost the Pittsburgh game

as the defense played well in that game, but Baltimore and Philly losses cannot fall solely on his poor play in those games, the defenses were pretty bad as well and contributed equally to those losses, just as they did Sunday night.

My initial point was that game managing, smart qbs win Super Bowls when they have great defenses and solid running games. Dallas has had neither for the past several years so even if Romo would have been what you want him to be, without making a lot of plays himself in the passing game, the Cowboys aren’t winning the Super Bowl regardless.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

So what you're saying

If you surround Romo with a top notch defense, running game, and OL, he’ll be an outstanding QB.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

He's an outstanding QB now

but with flaws to iron out. Why does it have to be binary – he’s either good or he’s bad?

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just a little sarcasm

It makes me chuckle how when he has a bad game people find a lot of other reasons the Cowboys lost. There are always multiple reasons for losing but sometimes it’s fair to point the finger. Last year we heard his December swoon was the OL and of course bad team chemistry. This year when he lays an egg it’s the defense. Both points are somewhat valid. I just don’t hear that so much about other NFL QB’s. Somehow great players find a way to get past all the other things.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

don't know if you believe this

but the Cowboys would still lose games occasionally if Romo played great, they have other holes and it makes me chuckle when some fans want to always point the finger at the qb when in fact other parts of the team played bad as well and contributed to the loss too.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're right

Romo is never at fault. In fact he’s perfect.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

no, he is far from perfect

I think that is obvious to even the biggest Romo supporters.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 1:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their comments frequently don't reflect that

People make more excuses for him here than he does for himself.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think they make excuses

they’re just pointing out that Romo isn’t the only player to blame for losses, there is plenty of blame on the team to go around.

When Romo plays poorly, he certainly is partially to blame but so are many others.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, I agree Romo was very much to blame for the last loss

the only thing I’ve brought up is that defense is concerning. That will cost any shot at a SB as surely as Romo or Felix coughing up the football.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

No this time it was the QB.

The D sucked but at least they played well enough to win. Romo didnt.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Sep 27, 2009 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

He would be the first to agree that he has to change that

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree

Romo hasn’t even started 50 games in the NFL, that isn’t a lot of experience for the qb position.

Running the scout team and watching games from the sidelines is not really live game experience, and really that’s the only way you learn is by actually playing.

I’m of the opinion there still is a learning curve with Romo, he hasn’t seen everything there is to see from defenses yet.

Romo’s age or years actually in the league really have nothing to do with it.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

He's started 5 less games than Ben Rothlesberger

This comment is getting really old. He’s 1/2 way through whatever NFL career he’s going to have and almost 30 years old. I would suggest a different excuse.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 11:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think it's an excuse

I think it’s a fact he hasn’t played in a lot of games. I’m not the only one either, Herm Edwards mentioned this week that you can’t really judge how good a qb will be until he plays at least 3 full years in the league. Romo is almost there, not quite yet.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wander what Herm was saying about Ben

when he was winning his first superbowl in his second year in the league

by dcfanz on Sep 25, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are a few exceptions to that rule

Brady, Roethlisbegrer are a few, but you can’t judge all qbs on just a few qbs who caught lightning in a bottle early in their careers.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Evidently you didnt see him play.

His D, the Refs, and his WR throwing the game winning pass won the game.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Sep 25, 2009 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah

I always maintained that the Steelers won that Super Bowl in 2005 in spite of Ben instead of because of him.

That being said, he did play great in the playoffs preceding the Super Bowl.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

despite what a lot of fans think

qbs don’t win Super Bowls all by themselves, it takes a complete team effort and Super Bowl 40 was an example of that.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

He's only been starting since part way through 2006

in military terms he’s a very junior O-3 at best. That’s barely out the gate.

And he has realized some of his potential already. He’s won a ton of games, he’s perfomed indiividually at a high level in the majority of games, he’s set franchise records for yardage, etc.

He needs to do more, for himself and the team, but he’s far from a projected failure that people would like to make him out to be.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don’t personally, and I haven’t heard many others call Romo a failure. I also recognize when he is good he is VERY good. What it is fair to ask is when he will stop making the SAME boneheaded mistakes. I thought Raf’s post the other day nailed it. It’s the 2-3 absolutely dumb decisions he makes every game that are his undoing. That’s pretty much been the case since he became a starter. He lit up the league right from the start.

by StillHateTheGiants on Sep 25, 2009 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh a lot do, but they are the extreme

He needs to ratchet down the errors, no doubt. But just to humor me, besides picks and fumbles, there aren’t many other mistakes for a QB to make, no? And I really don’t see a distinction between mistakes and boneheaded mistakes. As rotovibe’s fanpost points out, what looks like a complete brain cramp can often turn out to be a simple error.

He seems to be doing better with fumbles although the O-line’s good lay has helped. He did great on picks in game one, bad in game two. I just think it’s way early to say that he won’t or can’t change. Not saying that you have said that, ust the tone of several other people.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, qbs mistakes are always greatly magnified

because they are so visible to the average fan watching. Mistakes other players make that are also costly might go less noticed.

by cowboysfansince75 on Sep 25, 2009 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Romo cant throw the slant.

Does anyone actually know who he was throwing to on the 1st int. If it was RW then it was a bad throw but not a bad decision. If it was crayton it was both.
I said it once before but I’ll say it again. Romo cant throw the slant. If there is 8 passes a QB must be able and you make a list of his best throws(1st) to his worse throws(8th) then the slant for Romo is 9. Maybe this is why we didnt throw more slants last year. He just threw other balls better.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Sep 24, 2009 6:59 PM CDT reply actions  

There is a fanpost about it.

The dude breaks down the entire play. He was throwing it to Crayton.

by DoomsdayD75 on Sep 24, 2009 8:01 PM CDT reply actions  

And the post takes a really good football look at it

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I did not understand that Lucas/Gamble decision by the Panthers at all

Ken Lucas was highly paid but had been an excellent CB for them, and Gamble’s track record is just awful. Plus Gamble’s not exactly cheap either.

I realize that the Peppers contract hamstrung them (which seems to be another mistake— they sacrificed depth at multiple spots because they decided to franchise Peppers, who is too inconsistent to be an elite player), but why not at least try to trade Lucas? Cutting him loose and keeping Gamble seemed devoid of logic.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 24, 2009 8:31 PM CDT reply actions  

Lucas had been getting worse each year

2nd half of last year he looked like a deer in head lights. They also really like Nickel Richard Marshall, wand wanted to give him a shot. Oddly enough however, it appears as though rookie, 7th rounder Captain Munnerlyn is stealing that #2 spot. He got on the roster as a punt returner, and since has done nothing but make big plays when they put him in as a DB.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 24, 2009 9:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Irrelevant post on this thread:

Giants lost kenny phillips for the season…..this is a huge blow, its really unfortunate. Players on Philly and NY are going down like flies…

by foyesboys on Sep 24, 2009 8:58 PM CDT reply actions  

something you hate to see

But if its gonna happen anyway, hopefully we benefit from it ie take advantage of the dropoffs in talent.

I’d rather our best players go up against their best players and us come out on top but unfortunately injuries are a part of the game.

by MicThaRock on Sep 24, 2009 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Giants are ALWAYS one of the most injured teams in the league

aside from last year, they’ve always had more than 1 key player go down early. IN 2005 or 2006, i forget which one, they lost a ton of guys around midseason.

Now Alfords out for the year, who knows when Canty will be back, Bernard was hurt all of preseason, Ross is hurt and Phillips is done for the year

by foyesboys on Sep 24, 2009 9:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tuck just took a page from

Jacob’s flop book. He will be back soon. He got tired of getting his azz handed to him by Flo.

"Help, it's hot and dark in here and someone is laughing." Taco Bell

by GunsUp on Sep 24, 2009 9:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

im dumb

I somehow missed the earlier post about this

by foyesboys on Sep 24, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

That Does It

You’re fired.

Just kidding.

by kindablue on Sep 24, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Panthers offense will explode this week

They had one of the best o-lines, RB tandems, and WR in the league last year. They got off to a slow start after tip toeing around through camp and the preseason. But things started to click last week, and now they are primed as ever.

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 24, 2009 9:40 PM CDT reply actions  

What backs?

Are you trying to compare Felix Jones to a 1500 yard, 18 TD, 5.5 ypc back?

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 25, 2009 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Im trying to say,no I am saying, our backfield will out produce yours this weekend.

I love your backs and if you had read this blog during the summer, when people were talking about the best running game Vikes or Giants, I took Carolina. Unfortunately this is a new year and our line and double TE formation makes us a matchup nightmare. Combine that with your interior run D and you begin to see that your guys will be watching our guys light it up.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Sep 25, 2009 4:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

well atleast you know how to pick em'

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 25, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most things that explode

are sorta useless afterwards…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most things they explode on

Are useless as well. The Panthers were already useless… but misery loves company

on behalf of tha dirty south: soul food, carolina blue, southern hospitality, and tha queen city

by southtunnel on Sep 25, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just read on ESPN/FO that we're the only defense in the league without a sack

Very very strange. Lead the league last year, but last to get one this year. Even if our pass rush isn’t as good as last year…how is it possible to fall off THAT much? Hopefully we get to Delhomme this week.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Sep 24, 2009 9:47 PM CDT reply actions  

hah!

Tell me about it. I’ve started Dallas’s D 2 weeks in a row and they rewarded me with 2 big fat goose eggs. I’m such a damn homer that I’m actually starting them again. Hey, they can’t put up 0’s 3 weeks in a row, can they? CAN THEY!?!?

Summarizing the Dallas Cowboys in two words; inconsistently amazing.

by sublimezg on Sep 24, 2009 9:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

me 4..

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 25, 2009 10:13 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, me too

Dallas D has to do something soon. May be this is the week for redemtion.

by torchindefenses on Sep 24, 2009 10:06 PM CDT reply actions  

Im saying

A pick 6 this Monday

Someone's always Going to be Hating on Da Boyz

by Jeff G. on Sep 24, 2009 10:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

keep saying it,

one week it might be true.

I’ll do the same as i said the first two weeks:

If the cowboys dont turn it over, they win.

by THEjarhead on Sep 24, 2009 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Guys.

Who thinks the Lions will beat the Redskins? I’m one of them. Wishful thinking. :D

by Rickyy. on Sep 25, 2009 12:28 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't.... unfortunately

Through the years, the Redskins have always owned the Lions. Go check it out, it’s like a curse. In fact, I don’t think the Lions have EVER won in Washington (yeah, I know this one is in Detroit, just sayin’). Plus, too many people are picking this upset…. always a bad sign.

That and the fact everyone in D.C. is on the hot seat. I see the Skins winning pretty comfortably.

But don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see it.

For my kinda upset, I do think the Dolphins will go into San Diego and win.

by Road Warrior on Sep 25, 2009 6:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

That could really happen

That does not look like the San Diego of yore…

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1

This is my upset pick of the week, the Lions picked off Brees twice, they might go to town on Campbell if the Skins start putting the ball up. I just think that they Lions offense is better than the Redskins right now, so I am picking them to win. Stafford will have a big day.

by sduncan24 on Sep 25, 2009 6:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is the week.....

I had to pick Dallas on my suicide pool. I have Tony Romo, Marion Barber and Tashard Choice (in case Barber doesnt play) on my Fantasy League and I’ll be fasting all day Monday…….I wont be in the mood for another loss because of stupidities….better shape up motherf^$%rs.

by ManTab on Sep 25, 2009 8:27 AM CDT reply actions  

Offense

You guys seeing what I’m seeing?

1. No screens/swing passes to Felix. I would think this would be one of the top plays for this offense to run.

2. No more roll outs for Romo. I know they want him comfortable in the pocket. But didn’t he have outrageous numbers outside the pocket?

I also had Dallas as a D on a couple fantasy teams and Ware as a def. player in one league that uses that position. Very frustrating! But instead of switching, I’m hoping they’ll get a few Delhomme TOs Monday!

And I was also suprised Felix was caught from behind. He did have to cut earlier but I thought he had enough time to get to top speed before he was caught. Still amazing though!

by selke99 on Sep 25, 2009 8:37 AM CDT reply actions  

on point 1 , no screens

You dont run screens against zone coverage. The backs are always looking into the backfield. The giants played zone most of the game if not all of it.

by Musiccitynorm on Sep 25, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

thanks

Didn’t realize they were playing zone most of the game.

by selke99 on Sep 25, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

On point 2, you have nailed it

His first year and half as a starter, he had an unbeievably quick release and seemed to make tons of throws on the run. Starting last year, he seemed to become more of a pocket passer. I remember reading that he had studied Tom Brady game tapes to improve his game. He should study game tapes from his first 20 games or so and get back to being that guy

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Sep 25, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right but

roll-outs are a cllaed play. Garrett must not have seen what he wanted to run roll-outs. Not saying it’s a good thing because I think he’s great like that, but that’s the OC’s call.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

but he can’t call those at the line. Garrett has to.

Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig loves it.

by dunkman on Sep 25, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

you seeing 30+ points a game so far?

D is a concern no doubt.

Felix got caught and that surprised me a little too, but his burst on the front end was classic, great move in the open field too.

Stay healthy brother.

by THEjarhead on Sep 25, 2009 8:45 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys 2012 Defensive-Fronts
Small
Simplicity, and execution... The keys to the top offense of the last Decade...
Tn48_small
Building a Defense: The Case for Morris Claiborne
Kegbearer_small
Aikman, Irvin & Emmitt Interview

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn