The Redskins' legal team are jerks
So the economy is pretty tough right now on everyone. Most teams' season ticket sales are slipping. Teams like the Jaguars are in danger of having the entire season blacked out. As the economy affects the season ticket holders, many don't renew their tickets.
Some have purchased multi-year contracts in the past to get better deals. If these unfortunates are now broke, they have to renegotiate or risk defaulting on their multi-year contracts. Most teams will simply write off the contract and re-sell the tickets. The Redskins unfortunately appear to be kicking their fans while their down.
Hill is one of 125 season ticket holders who asked to be released from multiyear contracts and were sued by the Redskins in the past five years. The Washington Post interviewed about two dozen of them. Most said that they were victims of the economic downturn, having lost a job or experiencing some other financial hardship.
I personally think the NFL should suspend their blackout rules during the recession. But I REALLY think the Redskins need to lighten up on suing these people now that they can't afford it. It just doesn't seem fair that the Redskins can sue the customer for failure to pay AND resell the tickets. If the contract being broken doesn't lead to a loss (i.e. the seats in question were resold and the team is still making money selling the seats) how can you sue for damages? Moreover, it just seems like they are finding new ways to screw their fanbase out of money (something with which Jones and Snyder seem to be very good at).
Fortunately, I don't think JJ and the Cowboys are doing something like this, mostly due to the timing of the new stadium and the economic downturn if nothing else. Plus JJ has his own PR problems with the practice facility crash to risk pissing off the fanbase.
Snyder and his legal team however, just seem to take their loyal fanbase for granted which is a real shame. I hate the Skins and their fans, but I wouldn't wish this on any fanbase.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
You should post this at the pig sty ...err
hogs haven, or whatever it’s called.
"old's cool"
by CounterEMF on Sep 3, 2009 3:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
First off
There are several, several sides to this story. The very best take on it is from Rich Tandler’s Real Redskins blog in an entry titled: Ticket Rage.
What a lot of Cowboys fans don’t know is that the Washington Post and Redskins are at odds. Several times a year these to companies take time to jab one another. Second a person with a major role in this article is Jason La Canfora who used to be the WaPo’s Redskins Insider and is notorious for his dislike for the Redskins senior management to the point where it did indeed show in his Blog/ reporting. He has now joined the NFL network. Here’s the link to the post article and if you care to pleae compare both.
No disrespect but you should’ve researched a bit more before making a FanPost about the Redskins on a Cowboys Blog.
I'm worried about the beer supply. After this case, and the other case, there's only one case left- Barney Gumble
by CptChaosSidekick on Sep 3, 2009 3:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No need for research, any reason is a good reason to disrespect the Foreskins!
by bad knees on Sep 3, 2009 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh
Often I visit Blogging the Boys because I think it’s well written, and often has good input on many subjects. Comments like the ones by bad knees makes me think it might be going the way of Bleeding green Nation. No need for research wow guess we can just fling retarted nonsense with no football based thought because, hey it’s a rival.
I'm worried about the beer supply. After this case, and the other case, there's only one case left- Barney Gumble
by CptChaosSidekick on Sep 3, 2009 3:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The link you gave to Rich Tandler’s blog deals with a different story than the one mentioned in the FanPost. Yes, I’m willing to believe the WaPo probably has an agenda against the Skins’ front office, but what is being discussed in the FanPost is clearly wrong on Snyder’s part.
Also, Rich Tandler’s blog is for sophisticated Redskins fans? Ummm….
Everything's looking up, Milhouse!
by accidental innuendo on Sep 3, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, Cry me a river!
I have a question, did the Redskins seek damages aginst fans?
If no; then plz accept my humble and most sincere apology. I really mean that.
If yes: Shame on the elitist pigs!
by bad knees on Sep 3, 2009 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea! What he said!
BTB’s Official Dictionary Definition:
ECSTASY: any chance to laugh at Snyder and Hate on the skins at the same time.
Okay, so I lied…
…it’s not official.
Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.
by DalaiLuke on Sep 4, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A contract is a contract
When you sign a contract, you gots to perform, brother. I’m with Danny-Boy – sue the berstards. JJ taught him well. Half those guys in the FEDEX suites are corrupt politicians or cigar-smokin’ wannabes anyway – Ha! Glad they’re going down. Oh, and have you read the fine print of the Cowboys season-ticket contract…if you don’t pay in Big D, you’ll be getting that same knock on the door.
"The Most Dangerous Man in the world is the one with nothing to lose"
by SaratogaRacing on Sep 4, 2009 8:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don't have a problem with this, esepcially since it looks like they entered into a multiyear contract to get a discount.
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
by Seanrude on Sep 4, 2009 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
if its against companys that use profit to buy tickets to..
A football game then I’m all for them sueing them..but if its just regular fans then I think that’s low, no matter what team does it…actually it would piss me off more if it was the cowboys because danny boy seems like he doesn’t really care about the redskins but only about the diba-denz…
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
by hashishkabob on Sep 4, 2009 12:36 PM CDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs

by 
















