Blogging The Boys: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

THINGS EVERY COWBOYS FAN SHOULD FEEL GOOD ABOUT

You know me. I’m not one to shy away from controversy in the SB Nation blogosphere. I generally won’t hesitate to challenge your paradigms and force you to ‘man up’ when it comes to why you believe what you believe. I’m also probably more inclined – yes, I’ll admit it - to examine some of the not-so-positive aspects of all things Dallas Cowboys, while others (hey, there’s nothing wrong with being a homer, we need homers too!) tell you the future is bright and filled with nothing but 16-0 seasons and Blings this and every year. However, regardless of how some might characterize my rants, I’m no football Scrooge. In fact, as I do every year, I was only too happy to offer up some of the areas that make me puff out my chest when I think about the upcoming season.

 

It might surprise some, but there are a good many things that Dallas fans should feel good about coming into the 2009 opener. As someone who prides himself on being balanced, I was not going to miss my opportunity to talk about those things. So come on, grab a cold one and let’s consider the big-ticket items that should make all of our fans happy and our adversaries fearful…

 

All hail the cleaners! Jerry, Stephen and their minions should be applauded for sanitizing the Cowboys locker room. After all, it was pretty clear that there was some mildew around the showers and some crud along the baseboards. The air has been cleared, the new scent is ‘Autumn Romo Springs’ and everything has been laid out for Tony to ascend to the throne and fill the leadership chasm on this team. Distractions? No more Pac, Tank, Ellis and T.O. Nope, they all go bye-bye. To me, this is the most important philosophical change on this team since Deion Sanders came to Dallas. This team is going with guys who subjugate their own multi-million dollar egos to the overall goals of the team. When you couple this with the constant drama around Brett Favre and the zany goings-on in Denver, lots has happened to make Dallas a less appealing source of media fodder. Regardless of how this new ‘team-first’ dogma pans out on the field, isn’t it just great to finally have a roster chock full of guys that you not only like to see play, but that you actually LIKE? 

 

The return of the Flash. Maybe I am making too much of this, maybe I need to calm down, but with T.O. gone, Felix Jones is the one true offensive game breaker on this team. He adds a dimension of electricity and excitement that no other Cowboys star on the offensive side of the ball brings with them. Not since Herschel Walker was here has a Dallas RB had his kind of long speed. Jones is a big play waiting to happen and his presence on the field will force opposing defenses to think twice about overload blitzes because of the price they’ll pay if he can get to the second level. If Redball can find ways to get the ball to Flash in space, we could see lots of him on Sportscenter and some big W’s against tough teams in December.

 

The brains behind the brawn. Kyle Kosier is back and, for those fans who derided him for being the smallest and weakest of the group (you all know who you are…but you probably won’t admit it), he is obviously the cerebral link on the Dallas Offensive line. Early returns look like the pass protection will be much improved in 2009 over the ‘jailbreak’ that was the abysmal 2008 performance, and that is critical to the team’s ability to conduct a more controlled, methodical attack. As I’ve said before, 2009 is Hudson Houck’s chance to be our hero, but we should also give credit where it is due and I think Kyle Kosier’s real value to this team has become abundantly clear. Welcome back Kyle!

 

The WB on Fox…huh? Relax, it’s not Warner Brothers, it’s Witten and Bennett. Dallas has what could be the most devastating one-two punch at TE the game has ever seen. With more NFC teams moving to a 3-4 alignment on defense, Telly’s emergence as a potential bookend stud to (the game’s best TE) Jason Witten could revolutionize how teams attack the 3-4 and force opposing Defensive Coordinators to go back to the drawing board. Both players have displayed tenacious blocking coupled with the ability to catch mid-range passes in the seams. Would it surprise anyone here if we saw the ‘WB’ become a household name by mid-season? This is truly one to watch in ’09.

 

No more free lunches. Beyond cutting Brad Johnson loose, it was good to see the team make some (long overdue) moves and find replacements for players (Roy Williams 38, Greg Ellis, Zach Thomas, Chris Canty and Isaiah Stanbust) and coaches (Bruce Read) who just were not doing their jobs well enough to warrant keeping them. It will be interesting to see how the new cast of characters like Igor Olshansky and Joe DeCamilis do in their respective roles. Regardless, this looks like a sign from the team that neither draft position nor coaching pedigree is an acceptable crutch for anyone to use for poor performance.

 

Finally! A Sensible addition. Gerald Sensebaugh has the look of a very solid safety in both coverage and run support. For the first time since Brock Marion left town, it’s very possible the Dallas Cowboys won’t be known for ridiculous blown deep coverage against guys like Santana Moss, DeSean Jackson and others. The confidence that comes with having the right help over the top should give Newman and the two sophomore CB’s a big sigh of relief on play action passes and allow them to jump some routes that they shied away from in years past. That should mean more turnovers!

 

Who’s got his back? He plays on offense but doesn’t start. In fact, if he never sees the field on offense this season, it’s likely good things are happening for our Cowboys. However, if (God forbid) something happens and Tony Romo goes down, we finally have a QB behind him who isn’t over the hill, isn’t playing with a noodle for a right arm and isn’t going to force us to pair down the playbook to accommodate his physical inabilities. Yes, Jon Kitna may not make a single notable play this year, but if he has to, I think most people feel like he can. And that’s a feeling of security that we haven’t had in quite a while.

 

Chuck Howley would have loved this. Keith Brooking is not in his prime. He’s no longer the sideline-to-sideline force that he was in his mid-20’s. What he is, is nasty, tough and violent – three things not normally associated with Dallas’ defense. Brooking may turn out to be an even bigger addition to the Cowboys defense than Sensebaugh because of what he brings them…an identity. This is a lunch pail guy, the kind that you’d normally see playing in Chicago or Baltimore or Pittsburgh. Brooking doesn’t want to hit opponents, he wants to punish them. He’s a practice hard - play hard kind of player and could quickly become one of the emotional leaders of this defense. Having played for Phillips before and knowing what he wants to accomplish on defense is an added benefit because that familiarity will allow him to assume a more ‘front and center’ vocal role in the locker room. I’m thinking the over/under on concussions he causes in 2009 is three. Any takers?

 

Buehler? Buehler? Anyone? Buehler? How do you not just get all excited about this kid from USC? He’s an athlete, through and through. While I don’t know if our Special Teams coverage will be markedly improved this year or not, I do know that opponents will have a lot farther to run after kickoffs if they want to start their possession beyond the 25-yard line, which has been the case against Dallas for several years now. This guy could be worth 80 yards of field position per game! I hope this kid turns out to be my draft judgment error of 2009 (2008 was Bennett, assuming he continues to improve physically and mentally). In a pinch, this guy can play gunner, safety, LB, nose tackle and offensive coordinator. One thing: shouldn’t they play the Beatles’ Twist and Shout before every one of his kickoffs?

 

We must protect this house! Say what you will about the video screen being too low, Cowboys Stadium is the new yardstick by which all other sporting venues in the world will be measured. It is remarkable, both in scope and in grandeur. I’d like to think it can add a new dimension to the term, "home field advantage". D.D. Lewis said "Texas Stadium has a hole in its roof so God can watch his favorite team play." Well, Cowboys Stadium has a hole AND a 60-yard long HD video screen where God can watch instant replays too. Seriously, what better place to call home for America’s team and its fans? Come to think of it, what better place to begin a new Dallas dynasty?

 

After the sting of a bitter, season-ending blowout loss to an unnamed division foe, after dealing with a long off-season of heartache from last year’s season with ‘Super Bowl or bust’ expectations, we stand on the verge of finally being able to give grace to the past and look toward the future. Indeed, there is plenty to like and feel good about when it comes to the 2009 iteration of the Dallas Cowboys. So, let’s put aside our differences of opinion about whether we should have cut Isaiah Stanbust or whether Tony should be playing ‘hide the sausage’ with his new GF the night before the game. None of that really matters now. What does matter is that we all must unite under a single banner…one that connects us during the fateful journey ahead, a banner of hope for the sixth Cowboys Bling. Yes, it’s time to focus our collective POSITIVE energies and direct them toward our beloved team as they go into battle. They need us right now…let us not falter.

 

GO COWBOYS!

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

8 recs  |  Comment 176 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

1st

no I didn’t read it. I’ll get to that later, just wanted to be the 1st of 300, Plus you can’t argue the point that I am 1st!

by bad knees on Sep 6, 2009 12:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How Quickly We Forget
For the first time since Brock Marion left town…

Darren Woodson was fantastic in deep coverage, and most everything else. He was twice, three times the safety that was Brock Marion. Shame on you for forgetting!

Major props, though, for a well-written article with some very clever paragraph intros.

by kindablue on Sep 6, 2009 12:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I loved Woody, but he was never paired with anyone that played center field the way Marion did...

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But You Weren't Talking About Pairings

You were talking about how well we covered deep. We covered deep very well from 1992 to 2003, until we lost Woodson. Marion left after the 1997 season, and we still covered well until Woody retired. I’m not sure what Marion has to do with coverage…maybe you meant we haven’t had two safeties with good cover range since Marion. That I would agree with.

by kindablue on Sep 6, 2009 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Read that paragraph again, I think it speaks more to overall safety play

…and how that allows the corners to be more aggressive.

I used Marion as an example because Dallas was seldom beat when he was back there.

While Woody was great in his own right, he wasn’t the deep half cover guy that Marion was, IMO.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've Read It Several Times

And the meaning you are now expressing was not clear. I won’t argue semantics, but I will disagree that Marion was a better deep cover safety than Woodson. I don’t ever recall him being around when we had a “ridiculous blown deep coverage”.

by kindablue on Sep 7, 2009 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think about when Woody split the field with Roy Willy

Roy’s deficiencies were usually covered up by Woody, but not always.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Roy

Didn’t arrive until 2002, and I don’t recall the bad deep coverages with Roy, or George Teague, or anyone else when Woody was back there, in any event.

I’d like to know of specific instances where you believe this happened. Or even one.

by kindablue on Sep 8, 2009 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't Randy Moss (in Minny) burn this team deep repeatedly with Woody back there?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And wasn't T.O. killing us during the Teague and Woody era?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So If Two of the Best

Receivers in the history of the game, who were torching everybody at that time, had success against us too, it was because of “ridiculous blown deep coverages”? One does not follow from the other.

by kindablue on Sep 9, 2009 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't Moss have like 4 TD's against us?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

* in one game?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was only 3.

But he only had 3 catches so his line was 3 for 156, 3 TD’s. The really insulting part of that game was that Aikman was having a pretty huge day himself; the difference was his long TD bombs were to some guy named Patrick Jeffers; needless to say Moss has continued catching bombs a long time after Jeffers has came and gone from the league.

by MadMick on Sep 10, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kindablue's point is well taken...

but these WR’s, who were and continue to be great, had career days against Dallas seemingly every time they played us.

I won’t go through the stat line of every WR who ever played us during Woody’s tenure, but anecdotally (and empirically supported by these two guys torching us) we weren’t a great deep half coverage secondary after Marion left, IMO.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They Did Not Have Career Days

Against us. You’ll have a hard time with the empirical argument. Was Moss’s game against us his rookie year that much better than what he did against the Packers on Monday night that same year? Or the second game against the Packers? Or against the Bears, the week after he played us? If you carefully review his career game log, the Dallas games do not particularly stand out—Moss ripped up defenses regularly his first few years in the league.

Owens had one game against Dallas when Woodson was in the lineup where one could argue he burned us deep, in 2001: Five catches, 93 yards, no touchdowns. Many remember the 2002 game where he scored two touchdowns, but none of them was a deep catch. Everyone remembers the Monday fiasco in 2004, but Woodson was retired by then.

And that’s being generous on my part. I think of a blown coverage where a receiver breaks free and is wide open. I never saw that in any of those games. Maybe you did, which is why I asked you to cite a specific instance. It sounds like you’re going from recollections of how good the receiver did, rather than how poorly was our coverage.

by kindablue on Sep 10, 2009 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, when a receiver blows up against your team...

one of two things is generally true:

either there were lapses in coverage, or he was just better than your DB’s.

I chose lapses in coverage (not saying that other teams didn’t have the same problems) as the rationale.

I think the essence is that when a WR has a huge game, he has made a team pay for their coverage mistakes, which very few WR’s can do week in and week out. Moss and T.O. are special, but if you go back to the days when Marion patrolled the deep half, I’d bet that those kinds of huge days from WR’s were fewer and farther between.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 11, 2009 10:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You've Almost Completely Redefined

Your original statement, which was that after Marion left we were known for “ridiculous blown deep coverage”, an opinion for which is no evidence. Now you’ve redefined your opinion so that if one receiver has a great game against us, it must have been because of poor coverage. Even with the new position you’ve retreated to, it’s still logically problematic. Why stop at one receiver? What if a quarterback hits several receivers for long gains; how is that any different than a single receiver doing the same?

Even if I accept your bet on your redefined terms, I think you would lose. We got burned when Brock Marion was back there, like in the 1995 games against San Francisco, both games against Green Bay, Oakland, Arizona and Kansas City. That’s just 1995; I can find more in the next two years. Does that mean Brock Marion caused us to “be known for ridiculous blown deep coverage”; or that he had lapses in his coverage? No; it means even with the best of defensive backs, teams give up big plays. That stuff happens, even back in the imaginary glory days when supposedly things were great.

You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but the evidence doesn’t give much weight to it.

by kindablue on Sep 12, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm excited about almost all of the same points,

and I really hope Sensabaugh will be the answer at safety, but I’m still a little nervous about how much of an improvement he’ll be.

I won’t argue one bit that he is an improvement over Roy, though.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 6, 2009 12:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You get the feeling he can be special, and I'm ever the optimist...

But where’s all the positive press on this guy? Has he wow anyone in preseason? Has he made any glaring mistakes?

After suffering through Roy’s early decline, Sense is bound to be an improvement. How much remains to be seen.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Sep 6, 2009 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to worry

I think Sensebaugh will make us all smile after game 1.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well he did give me a free shirt

So I’m already all smiles about him

by Joon on Sep 7, 2009 6:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't take much to please you, eh Joon?

;-)

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well his big mistake was the (questionable) PI call in the first Raiders series, and he also made a nice PBU in that game, but we did see some of his closing speed that was already a noticeable upgrade. I just remember how the fans on Jags blogs were not happy to see him go, thought it was a loss for them, and I think he will turn out to be not only a significant upgrade, but a key piece of the D that lets Wade turn everyone else loose to finally fully implement the transition to his aggressive 3-4.

by scottmaui on Sep 6, 2009 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't see any mistakes from him

but I didn’t see any plays either, so as long as no Bad comes from him it is a extreme upgrade from last year, I don’t think a SS we had starting made an INT last year but gave up quite a bit of plays

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Sep 6, 2009 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice write up

I do believe we truly have a lot to be realistically optimistic about, and can’t wait to finally see some real football that counts!

by scottmaui on Sep 6, 2009 12:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Amen

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kitna, Sensabaugh, Bueller

I’m not as excited about these guys as most other people seem to be. I don’t know if constantly dropping the ball is better than having a weak arm or being over the hill. And it’s not like Kitna has a reputation as a high percentage, low interception guy, either. I haven’t really seen anything special out of Sensabaugh, and I know some will argue that that’s better than RW, but we’ll see. When we picked this guy up, most were calling him RW lite, not as many bad plays, but also not as many good plays. I haven’t seen anything yet to change that opinion. As for Bueller, I don’t think he has delivered what was advertised. Not enough to justify carrying 2 kickers, anyway.

by Baked Potato Soup on Sep 6, 2009 1:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice post, Blings ... an enjoyable read.

I have my own list of “wait and see” to add to BPS’s version…

Cleaners, Jones, Kosier, WB, sense, kitna, brooking, beuhler, house

As far as the "Cleaners’ goes, I agree with Knees below that Ellis could have been useful this year.

Jones, Kosier, WB and Brooking all deserve the accolades you’re offering.

But I have to agree with BPS on Sense and Kitna … while I’m sure they’re an upgrade, the truth is that this isn’t saying much. Sense gets praise for both coverage and run support, and I have not seen anything to take away from this, it’s just that I also don’t see the stand-out as advertised by some Jags fans when we first got him. Kitna has looked good in pre-season, but his interception history worries me.

Beuhler will be fine… he’s exactly what we expected… I can’t wait for the first time he lays lumber on a return guy! I can just see it… some team finally springs a guy past the 25, only to be FLATTENED at the 32 by Beuhler … taking what little momentum they may have had and delivering it right to our incoming D.

Speaking of BIG D, here’s to going 8-0 in the new house, starting with the G-men!!!

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Sep 6, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oops... forgot to delete my notes in 2nd line ...

no, wait, that was just an extended typo… yea, yea, not me

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Sep 6, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Upgrades are upgrades

If your team does that every year and can also do that with its 2nd and 3rd stringers, then your team has a chance to compete every year.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well were are the real up grades?

Beulher is at kick-off specialist, but then again we are losing a Real game day roster spot.

Ellis for who? Butler and maybe Williams; doesn’t look like an up grade at face value right now, but then again it is youth and who knows what then can turn into.

Burnett for Carpenter? Push maybe, Williams may be an improvement if he can add 20 lbs and play the run, Hodge was my guy here.

Canty for Igor? Push, hopefully.

Johnson for Kitna? Upgrade, needs to concentrate on 1st things first.

Tank for Jr? Push? yet to be determined.

Zac for Brooks? Upgrade+ but not a long term deal; Williams and Hodge have a long way to go to be Brooks, if ever.

T.O. for Every other reciever? Upgrade

by bad knees on Sep 6, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Williams doesn't need to put on 20 lbs

He is listed at 238 most places, he needs a whopping 4 pounds to be at Brooking’s weight.
I do think we have lost Talent, but as we saw Talent doesn’t win championships, Ellis was a whiner on the decline, I think Spencer vs Ellis will be a push, but I don’t think Butler will be as good as Spencer was, maybe CJ can do it.
Barbie has been pretty good in coverage, and from the reports was better when first teamers are out there, hopefully that continues
Igor was much better against the run vs. Canty the last time he had Wade as a coach, if he brings that game back he will actually be an upgrade in run support, but a smidgen less in pass rush.
TO is gone = Romo less turnovers…I hope
Brookings is going to be better than Zac, esp this year, he got cut from KC….not a powerhouse team

Beuhler- If he gets 5 touchbacks this year, he was worth it

Pac vs Jenkins/Scandrick = Upgrade..Major Upgrade, even Crayton as PR is and upgrade

Tank for JR.- If Jr. can play consistent mediocre ball, he will be an upgrade, Tank would flash a play here and there but got his ass handed to him more times than not last year

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Sep 6, 2009 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How many sacks does Butler need to have to beat Spencer's total last year?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not fair,

Spencer played sparingly and only on running downs.

by Musiccitynorm on Sep 7, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I expect the same from Butler

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

I read they were teaching him both run and pass rushing but now the season has started they are only going to work on his pass rushing skills. Not both.

by Musiccitynorm on Sep 8, 2009 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know about all that

I have just got the impression from what hass been written that he really can’t hold his ground, in the run game.

by bad knees on Sep 8, 2009 2:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Butler is...

an afterhought.

If he plays a lot, we’re in big trouble anyway.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

afterthought*

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go Cowboys! Bling you da man! Nice post!

K, now that we are all on the same page and motivated toward a positive and successful season without the media drama, and since I finally read the post ( I read slow and listen even slower ) I will attempt to comment in a meaningful and thoughtful way to it. ( key word: attempt )

I have to agree that disinfecting the locker room of the foul stench of thugism, selfishness, and drama and that new sent of team is refreshing.

How could one not be excited about the Felix, I think we should call him SILK because he is just so smooth with his gazelle-like gate, just hope he doesn’t prove as fragile.

WB? come on man you could have done better, but you couldn’t have been more right about the potential of these two.

As far as overdue changes, why you were correct about Stanback,Johnson and Williams, Ellis could have served another useful year here in big D at the back up role, Expecting mid round rookies and practice squad players to fill the back up roll that was held by a first round talent ( take your choice Spencer and Ellis were both 1st rounders) I think was a bit of a sacrifice and pipe dream. Instead of out right releasing him, don’t you think we could have at least got a 6th or 7th rd. pick? Zac, wasn’t overdue, he was only here a year and everyone was ok with it, until we let him go and got Brooking. Canty was also not overdue, if we could have signed him for a reasonable price everyone would be cool with that also.

Sensebough, does seem to be better in cover than Roy. We’ll see what the season shows.

Brooking as stated above, seems to be an upgrade over Zac and anyone else who played the position in the last couple years; Problem is depth this year is week in the middle linebacker position, and I mean after the starters, no one is strong aginst the run.

Beuhler, whats not to like except our best draft pick is a frigging kicker, and not even a field goal kicker: However, I do think he is a definate asset to the team, even though I don’t think he would make any team as a LB, or a safety or anything else, but your right in an emergency he could play them, but in such a case all hope is lost anyway.

The Stadium, Yes it’s everything we heard it was going to be; Wish I had the money to watch TV and eat wings there. There is nothing like the experiencing the atmosphere of accually see a Cowboys game with 100,000 drunk strangers. I accually would love to go to a game one day; but since my money is hard earned and I don’t live in the area, my couch is accually very comfortable and/or the Hooters girls give better service. Lastly: Hey Jerry Raise the Damn screen!

I really enjoyed the read and I agree with you for the most part; Other than the line being healthy I don’t see any significant outward changes from last year besides Beuhler’s kick offs, the possibility of Felix and the offensive line being healthy all season ( that’s a bigggggggy!) and a dream of a receiver who can both catch and stretch the field, who can accually get on the field.

by bad knees on Sep 6, 2009 1:42 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I was done with Ellis 2 years ago

He was never a prototypical 3-4 OLB and couldn’t stop whining about not getting an extension.

He was the #8 pick in the draft and never played like it.

I don’t know what we could have gotten from another team trying to trade Ellis.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

nothing

i think they tried to trade him and got no takers. $ is also a factor, need his salary to help pay Ware.

by scottmaui on Sep 6, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...

let’s open up the post to all who might have a good nickname for our 1-2 punch at the Tight End position.

Anyone got a good one?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

here a start but I know there are more creative people than I out there:

Marty’s: Beans and Rice ( very appropriate seeing how they could be a staple in our offensive diet)
Texas Two Step ( I read that somewhere, don’t really care for it)
Guts and Glory, ( kind of like that one, and fits well)
Fun and Fundamental
Double Clutch
Heart and Soul

Sad, but thats all I got.

by bad knees on Sep 6, 2009 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's keep that discussion going...

Not sure either one would want to be known as either.

;-)

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about something like Brangelina:

Winnet.

Which is exactly what they’re gonna help us do.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 7, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bitten

You’re team will be Bitten!

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Sep 7, 2009 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder which one of them would hit you in the mouth first if you called them Brangelina?

:-)

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or Winnet

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha, I would never, ever call them Winnet to their faces!

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 8, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or Brangelina.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 8, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about J-Mart?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

or T2?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats funny

Into video games? Check out GamersBeyond.com for reviews/vids on latest video games from all platforms (PC, PS3, xbox, Wii)

by fuji1232 on Sep 8, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll be here all week...

try the veal…and don’t forget to tip your waitress!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 5:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Domino Effect?

It’s a decent color reference (like beans and rice) and also has a the effect that they’ll produce in the League…

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Sep 7, 2009 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bling

Very nice post. It’s good to see that you actually aren’t a glass half-empty kind of guy after all. About the WB, Whitten is one of my all-time favorite Cowboys & I have been a fan since year 1. He reminds me so much of a Jay N, although Whitten is bigger & a better blocker. What Marty B brings to the table though is fantastic athleticism. I see in Marty B RAC ability like Shannon Sharpe in his heyday but Marty B is bigger and may be a better blocker. It may not happen this year but I can see the red zone at Cowboy’s Stadium being renamed Bennetville.

BP Soup, I don’t know what you have seen from Bueller but what i have seen is very poor starting position for opposing teams on every kick-off. He doesn’t have to kick touch backs every time to be effective. Actually, his best kicks have been those high kicks to the goal-5 yard line. I don’t think very many of them have even been returned to the 20.

For those not sold on Sensebaugh, I think we need to see how he plays once the season starts. I think his position especially has been rained in by the vanilla play calling. He may not be a real dominate player but he don’t have to be. I think when all is said & done, we will see him as a solid pick up. Hey, from what we have had at that position for the past few years, solid is a major upgrade.

Bling, just to show you that I too don’t just always focus on the good things, here are my concerns for the season:
1- Offensive line health – backup situation.
2- Can Austin & Hurd stay on the field? If so, I like our receivers. We don’t need no stinkin TO
3- Special Teams. Some things are looking up for that phase of the team, but we won’t really know if there has been an improvement until we see it. I love the acquisition of Joe De & I like what I see as commitment to that phase of the game from J. Jones & Coach Phillips. One thing is for sure, the Cowboys can not play much worse on special teams than what they have played the past several years.

by geth13 on Sep 6, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How funny to see some of you...

moderating my optimism with things that you are either unsure of or playing a waiting game.

The time for that is passed.

Now, we must focus on seeing our starters play well and stay healthy.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Felix

If he stays healthy, the guy is gonna have an amazing year. I think hes going to be the biggest playmaker in the division (unless by some crazy chance westbrook stays healthy). You are absolutely right, teams are gonna be afraid of the overload blitz because if felix gets past the line, he may was well be gone. If Garret can do good job keeping both felix and barber fresh and using them at the right times, we’re gonna be a huge force offensively…we may very well be talking about those two being by far the best 1-2 combo in the league by the end of the year.

I feel very confident about our starters. If we stay healthy at lb, ol and qb, I think we absolutely can get 10-12 wins. But our depth at these spots worries me. We really can’t afford a single injury at whats probabbly the most likely position to suffer an injury, lb. I think we have similar problems on the OL,although Free at least showed something this preseason, so im slightly more confident there. And OL just don’t get hurt as much. And at qb…I have my doubts about kitna, but he WILL NOT be worse than brad johnson, who turned in one of the worst performances in football history in his 2.5 game stint. With Kitna…we have a chance against legitimate teams, even if the defense has a bad day. That in itself is a huge improvement.

I get the feeling Brooking and Bradie will make a very good combo. I saw a lot from Bradie the second half of last year, he really turned a corner i thought. Those two are gonna be some mean SOBs in our run game.

Bring on Tampa Bay!

by foyesboys on Sep 6, 2009 5:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

On Kitna

He’s been great when called upon to serve in short stints and he has just never been long-term starter material.

He has to be one of the NFL’s 10 best backup QB’s, given his starting experience and ability to not impair his OC from calling the plays he wants to call.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 6, 2009 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

if he can just get that snap thing down

pretty weird that a veteran like him is having trouble with the single most fundamental action a QB must perform, simply taking the snap from center.

by scottmaui on Sep 6, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to The Lunch Break

Josh and Nick were remarking how Kitna fumbles a snap at least once per day in practice. I like him as a backup, but he has to stop the butter fingers.

by kindablue on Sep 6, 2009 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

but isn’t he dropping snaps from Proctor? How is to say it isn’t Proctor’s fault? I have no idea because I am not in the huddle with them, but just a thought

by sduncan24 on Sep 6, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

he dropped what 3 in the vikings game, and at least one or two were from preston, and wade actually said in one presser that it was kitna’s problem not proctor’s. proctor got a lot of grief for it. but in the vikings game we saw it wasn’t just with him, it was kitna.

by scottmaui on Sep 7, 2009 2:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It can be corrected

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Schwetty palms maybe?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Schwetty balls

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Sep 7, 2009 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok I know this is ridonculous

but project out for Felix… 15 touches per game * last year’s 9 ypc * 16 games = 2160 yard season woohoo! hahaha

by scottmaui on Sep 6, 2009 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wade said...

He wants Dallas to be a top 10 rushing team in 2009. That won’t happen with the current play call mix. I think that was his way of publicly saying to Redball, “don’t put my defense in difficult situations” this year and we’ll win some close games".

To do that, Romo won’t be allowed to lob the ball around 55% of the time as in previous years.

Lots more punting and field position on this year’s menu.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i don't agree with that

The problem was last year Romo threw it around like 63% of the time or something. IN 2007 we were #9 in rushing due to an offense that got early leads and slammed it down the oppositions throat for the last quarter. But even then, we weren’t really balanced – I’d like to see more balance than that year too.

55% sounds very reasonable to me. If you have a great qb, you probably don’t go under that. The Giants and Ravens had around 50%, the Giants had an Oline performing magnificently (they dominated us, baltimore, philly in the middle of the year) and the Ravens were protecting flacco. We have too many weapons at wr/te to consider this.

by foyesboys on Sep 7, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I gotta agree

This offense is built for speed, you want the ball in Romo’s hand. The beauty of this year is the number of options in both run and pass… Redball should be able to keep defenses off-guard, using the run to set up the pass at times, and the pass to set the run at others.

Not sure why you’d game-plan for more punts, unless your defense is dominant and your offense was wanting.

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Sep 7, 2009 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

play action fakes

I heard it commented during one of the preseason games that Romo seems to have improved in how he sells play-action fakes, that it appears to be something he’s working at off-season. I think we’ll see a lot of those and they’ll be used very effectively, using the dual-run threat of Barber/Felix esp out of 2-TE sets to set up play-action passes.

by scottmaui on Sep 7, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just dealing with Witten and Bennett off a play-action will give Ds fits...

Bennett just falling forward gives us 2nd and 4 !!

Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.

by DalaiLuke on Sep 7, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those don't work unless the defense is more fearful of your rushing attack than the pass

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

IF...

we run more with Felix than MBIII.

Barber isn’t a threat to take it to the house like Felix is.

If the contract and the ego thing keep Barber in too long to start games, Dallas could fall behind early and then we could see Redball get all one-dimensional again.

The have to change the mix if they want to be a top 10 rushing team. They’ll have to run early and often.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Built for speed?

How so?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something else I will say on the subject...

I’ve said before that we need to be preapred to see a less explosive offense this year. At the same time, I think there are tangible benefits to that shift, namely, fewer turnovers, better field position for the defense, greater time of possession and greater use of our strength, which (like it or not) is the team’s 6-legged running back trio behind a robust O-Line.

I don’t know if you “game plan” for punts, but you do approach a game differently if your intent is to physically dominate the opponent in the trenches and then take the game from them once they begin to stagger.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

doubt it

Garrett is no Parcells. He’ll be attacking down the field, you can count on that happening.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 8, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Garrett had better listen to Wade

…because Wade is on the hot seat and won’t allow too much risk taking if his defense is performing to spec.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

throwing downfield isn't risk taking

and I’m pretty sure Wade allows Garrett to run the offense how he sees fit, I’m sure Jerry has told Wade as much.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 9, 2009 7:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

You may be right.

If you are, poor Wade. A Coordinator in Head Coach’s clothing.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does having a great QB on the roster have to do with it?

The running backs are better weapons than the receivers; plain and simple. You can just as easily lead the league in scoring with a 50/50 balance if you know how to utilize the weapons you have properly. Just to name one recent team, that’s what the ’05 Seahawks did and to me, they clearly had a more well-rounded corp of wide receivers than this Cowboys team.

by MadMick on Sep 7, 2009 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

for one, the line has pass blocked a heck of a lot better than they have run blocked

WHen healthy, they give Romo as much time as anyone to throw. Would you rather have 9 yards per attempt or 5?

But in general, why not make use of your talent at qb to spread the ball around to 5 different receivers – that is much less predictable than handing it to a rb.

The 2005 seahawks didn’t have jason witten. They didn’t have Martellus Bennet. And our receivers are comparable to theres. Add in that Felix Jones in screen situations adds another deadly threat, and we have SO many more weapons than they did. They had a monster dominant oline with Hutch that was great at run blocking. They pretty much ran through the conference that year with imo a back that was pretty overrated in Alexander, kinda like the GIants with Jacobs. As of right now, though the preseason signs are positive, I find it difficult to say we have the oline necessary to run the ball like that

VERY few teams in this league have an oline so dominant that they can run 50% of the time and score a bunch of points.

Generally, the great offenses have a great qb. Its not always true – every year there are 1 or 2 teams that prove to be the exception – but its generally true.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 3:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Namely, because they will blitz Romo

…until they rattle him. Then, we’re likely to see fumbles and INT’s (hey the evidence is factual) and thenwe fall behind. Then, we don’t run.

Romo is at his best when he and Redball can freeze LB’s. But this group on the edge (RW with his bum wing, Austin who isn’t rising to the occasion and Crayton…ugh…don’t get me started) is not one of the things I am feeling good about this year for a reason. They are unproven at best.

So, take the big hosses up front, combine them with the RB’s and just take the ball out of McInjury’s and Eli’s hands. Pound the opponent into submission and then go over the top.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not true

Romo will burn the blitz if his OL and backs can pick up the blitz, that will be the key.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 8, 2009 1:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't that true every year?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure, but your statement

that all you have to do is blitz to rattle Romo is too simplistic.

Blitzes rattle Brady and Manning too if their OL and backs don’t pick them up as well.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 8, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is why it is the Season of Hud!!!

Ta daaaaaaaaaaa!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree that

this season hinges on how our offensive line plays (assuming all other factors like injuries stay in a normal range). If you give Tony some time and our backs some holes, this offense will tear teams apart and keep our defense fresh. If not, teams will send the house and turn this offense into what it has looked like in the second Eagles game in 2007 and in last year’s finale against that same Eagles team.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Sep 8, 2009 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Out of the gate...

teams will blitz the crap out of us.

If we can run the ball effectively and bust some big plays on quick hitting passes when they come with everything they’ve got, they’ll think twice about the risk vs. reward.

One other thing that HAS GOT TO HAPPEN is that Romo needs to make better decisions about taking the sack or throwing the ball away as the situation dictates, rather than throwing an INT or running into traffic and fumbling.

It isn’t all on the O-Line.

Otherwise, you’re right. We’re in trouble.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Random thought of the day

We’ve all noted the scary array of offensive weapons. But with that many offensive threats on the field, will we run into trouble at some point with the eligible receiver rule? Never fully understood that one.

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 8, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you elaborate?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

how many eligible receivers can we have on the field, and is there a possibility that we could field a formation where one of the traditional receiving options, say a TE or RB, would be an ineligible receiver depending either on where they line up or the amount of other potential receivers on the field?

by One.Cool.Customer on Sep 9, 2009 6:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

As I understand it, the 5 guys who make up the O-Line (which really is a function of how the players line up rather than their stated position) are inelgible. Everyone else, including the QB is eligible.

So, even in that crazy formation where the center lines up alone and the 4 other linemen bunch up off to the left or right as a group, the max # of eligible receivers is still 6.

At least I think that’s how it still works.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The O-line might not be a crushing run blocking unit but they can get the job done.

If the backs are so incapable of running the ball behind this line, then explain Choice’s solid YPC against the Giants, Ravens and Steelers; with Proctor in the line-up no less. I’ll grant you that Felix’s numbers from a year ago are obviously pumped up and half his long runs came against sorry Bengals and Packers run defenses and his YPC will certainly come back down to Earth if he does get close to an even split of carries with Barber. Bottom line: I think the line is plenty solid enough to pound the rock and still average at the very least 4.5 yards as long as they don’t run Barber into the ground like stubborn inflexible meatheads.

9 yards per pass attempt without T.O. probably ain’t happening unless Red Skull does manage to turn Felix into at least a Thurman Thomas-calibre threat out of the backfield or Austin becomes the new Alvin Harper; fat freaking chance o’ that, boy-o. Speaking of those Bills, even though they don’t exactly count since they did run the K-Gun (no-huddle) thus distorting their numbers, their four Super Bowl teams had a dead even run/pass split and they even eclipsed the 500-rush mark in 3 out of those 4 seasons.

Obviously, the Seahawks didn’t have Witten and Bennett. On the other hand, counting a guy like Austin as a weapon is still something of an exaggeration at this point. Like Hurd, until he actually turns his potential into production, he’s just another promising young dude. Those Seahawks had guys in Engram and Jackson that already had multiple 1,000-yard seasons . Well, technically Engram had a bunch of 900-yard seasons, but hell when you get right down to it Roy Williams only has one actual 1,000-yard season (out of five) on his resume. And say what you want about their underwhelming receiving corps but even on those Seahawks, Crayton still wouldn’t have been any better than 3rd or 4th on their depth chart. Also I bet once upon a time Seahawks fans still had high hopes that former No. 1 pick Peter Warrick would finally realize his "potential" with them.

I understand what you’re saying about a dominant O-line and it’s very true. However, the beauty of having a back like Felix is all he needs to do is find a small crease and he’ll be gone in a flash. Now I realize for that very reason, you’d say: “great all he needs is 8-9 carries and he’ll still have a long run every other game.” Of course, I disagree as 9 carries just doesn’t feel like enough.

I’ll amend my view to this: If Garrett is hellbent on 55 percent pass-skewed playcalling, a bulk of those need to be for the backs and more designed plays for Martellus. Otherwise, mark my words, you’ll see a lot of overly intricate fluff amounting to a whole lot of nothing and they’ll call it "getting all the receivers involved."

55 percent is fine as long as the bulk of the passes aren’t smoke-and-mirrors eye candy to get guys "involved." But if you ask me, Garrett is very prone to abandoning the run game so I wonder to arrive at that 55 percent, how many games does Garrett lose his mind and throw the ball 48 times? Also, as I’ve said before if they’re really serious about getting the backs and Martellus more involved in the passing game, I still don’t see 100 catches or anything in that neighborhood for Roy.

Last but not least, all this talk about how Dallas would be affected by the loss of T.O. and how fewer bigger plays would negatively effect the team led me to do some research. Okay, it was only a breakdown of last year and that was maddening enough. But I did a chart of where each team ranked offensively and defensively in terms of 20-plus yard plays and 40-plus yard plays. In general, the data was so clustered up and similar that it meant nothing; except of course in the case of the Steelers. In terms of 20-plus and 40-plus yard plays, they had 29 more than their opponents even though their offense was 26th in 20-yard plays generated and 18th in plays of over 40 yards. In other words, you afford yourself the luxury of being plodding if you don’t give up big plays. But that’s the Steelers defense and nobody needed an extra stat to tell you how good they are. If the Cowboys defense can actually force turnovers AND limit big plays, they can definitely win by pounding the rock on offense.

by MadMick on Sep 8, 2009 6:47 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you said...

We must run the ball more than 45% of the time.

If so, I agree with you, 100%. I mean, not run it 100%, but that I 100% agree that 45% is unsufficient. Wait, that came out wrong too.

Oh nooooooooooooooooooooooo……………

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Long story short...

Any mandate that this team has to pass 55 percent of the plays don’t seem right to me.

by MadMick on Sep 8, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

I think that is a recipe for disaster.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had a long response to this post

and then lost it.

Suffice it to say that the top 5 offenses the last 3 years have been dominated by passing teams. I’m not sure the Buffalo Bills are relevant in this discussion with the rule changes benefiting passing offenses so much. We’ve seen teams with great qbs lead passing offense with average wrs – Brady, Rivers, Brees for example. I think Romo is a great qb, which is why i’m not worrying about our lack of proven receivers.

But I agree with many of your points. I do believe we have overall more capable weapons than the seahawks (also, I believe alexander had around 20 catches that year….Barber is good for a solid 40 or so and im guessing felix will play a big role in our passing game). But I didn’t give their receivers enough credit – engram and Jackson make them more established than our receiving core.

I agree with a lot of your points, but in general, in todays league, its a big mistake for teams with great qbs to run the ball over 45% of the time.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bummer about your lost post.

I hate it when that happens.

I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree. As for the Bills, make no mistake, they passed a hell of a lot and very effectively. Like I said though, since they ran a no-huddle offense, there would be some seasons where they’d reel off an extra 80-100 plays over the course of a season than a team running a conventional offense.

The biggest thing is no matter what the philosophy or run/pass split, Felix has to get his touches or else that means Garrett is too smart for his own good as the architect of this offense.

by MadMick on Sep 8, 2009 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed on felix and garrett

No more playcalling catastrophes like that Washington game. Felix is too good and too big a threat to not get involved. But likewise, he needs to balance his carries with Barber’s carries – overusing either one would be a mistake imo.

Garrett has an interesting selection of talent at his disposal. We have 2 very good rbs with conflicting styles, a TE whose pretty much a #1 wr, another tight end who has a ton of potential and could be one of the more dynamic pass catchers in the league, and a WR who plays kinda like a tight end in RW, a reliable possesion wr in crayton and a couple less known potential players in austin and hurd who have a little more speed. To me, though we have talent, its not your selection of talent, and our success is gonna fall a large amount on garret’s shoulders.

by foyesboys on Sep 9, 2009 3:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have the top 5 offenses won the Super Bowl in any of those 3 years?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was my point exactly...

Jay Cutler isn’t going to scare anyone in Chicago with THAT group of WR’s.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm holding off onjudging them

We all thought the falcons had terrible wrs and then Ryan came and all of a sudden Roddy White is a top 3 wr in the conference and they can ball.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt Ryan could make me look like Larry Fitzgerald

He is THAT good.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's just too bad....

…That Ryan doesn’t play both ways like Slingin’ Sammy Baugh who once picked off four passes in a single game. Because Atlanta’s secondary sucks.

by MadMick on Sep 9, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

now thats funny

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 9, 2009 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Isn't it amazing how much better Atlanta's O-Line got...

in all phases of the game, once they had Michael Turner running behind it?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

running the football

was never the Falcons problem. Their problem was at qb where they had the most overrated qb in the history of the game lining up under center for several years.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 10, 2009 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bartkowski?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

very funny

you know who I’m talking about. The dog killer.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 10, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you take Vick out of the conversation...

I think they struggled to run. It was his dual threat that gave Dunn and Duckett any room they had.

Turner and Norwood are superior to that tandem.

Their O-line was much improved last year, but you may be right in that some of that should be attributed to opposing teams’ respect for the pass.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 10, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My guess was Chris "Ouch, my head" Chandler

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Sep 10, 2009 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So mean...

I like it.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 11, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just "messed" my britches

I’m speechless. Niceeeeeeeeeeee…………..post. Damn, that was hard to say.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Sep 6, 2009 9:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How many Fat Tire's

…did you have to down before you could type that?

LMAO

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm still hungover...

or drunk. {whoops, just threw up in my mouth re-reading my post}

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Sep 7, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Recs?

A lot of people has congratulated Blings for a well written post and no recs? What’s wrong guys?

Just because it’s 5Blings doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t recommend him… :D

It’s all fun.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Sep 7, 2009 11:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

#9 under center and the Cat running wild

Those are the 2 things that make me feel really good about this team.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 7, 2009 11:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

nice post but my thoughts are...

That ellis was a good player through bad times i’ll always have a soft spot in my heart for him, he was a bright star on a dull team for a long time…..and felix is nice to have but if barber gets all the touches i’ll be just fine with that, he’s the reason felix will have a good year..defenses will be glad to see barber out that they will soften up on the run just enough for him to do what he does….and for some to say bennett is this unstoppable force and could be better than whitten is disrespectful of whitt. And Bennett. I think we should just let him be himself and be happy if it allows jason some space to continue to be the best in the league…on a positive note I think wade will go ape shit with this D if our secondary can cover enough to let the front 7 attack and I think they will…I’m seeing sack totals in the mid to high 60’s and 8 to 15 picks not to mention forced fumbles..I’m getting worked up just thinking about it..so if our offense can controll the clock and not get to pass happy we’re in for a very big year….anyway here’s to a dominating D and a powerful O…GOOO COWBOYS…

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 7, 2009 12:54 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

and for some to say bennett is this unstoppable force and could be better than whitten is disrespectful of whitt.

Well, I’ve said that he has potential to be better, and? Is it really that false of an idea?

I don’t think much of Witten? Right now I would buy 2 players jerseys, Ware and Witten, because those 2 should be Cowboys for life.

So, no, I have a pretty good idea of Witten’s value, I just can see Bennett’s potential, he’s faster, bigger, has better hops and sports a soft set of hands. Witten is who he’s because he has a much better head over his shoulders and because he’s the thougher SOB that I’ve seen wearing a star on his helmet… Wasn’t there to see the Manster…

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Sep 7, 2009 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

well im rooting for bennett as much as anyone..

But mainly because it will allow whit. And barber to be more effective…so if he turns out to be a super stud that’s great but just improving on last years performance is good enough for me….he seems like a good guy and I think being himself is all we should expect or I should say all I can expect…

I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....

by hashishkabob on Sep 7, 2009 7:14 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

+1

People have gotten carried away with Bennet…

McGruber!

by Mojoness on Sep 8, 2009 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bennett scares me mentally, I don’t know if he has the mental strength, toughness, and decision-making to be better than Witten in the future, but he definitely has the athletic futures to do it. At least, we heard Bennett had a good off-season and worked hard, so maybe he’ll eventually become much better, but I don’t think anyone will eclipse Witten’s toughness on the field. He was a true player you would want to represent your franchise when he played with broken ribs and more injuries, and still was productive.

by Why on Sep 7, 2009 5:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Marty B is a fun guy, no need to worry about him

he seems to have taken criticism well

Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey

by Seanrude on Sep 7, 2009 7:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we know enough about him to say yet

…but the talent to be great is undeniably there.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea, the jury is still out

but I think we all have to admit, initial indications are very positive. Theres a long way to go though.

by foyesboys on Sep 9, 2009 3:01 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another well written post Blings

I know you like the 2 TE set with emphasis shifted towards running the ball more, and faster developing pass plays, as do I. All the talent at the RB and TE positions should help ease the burden on Romo. Let’s hope the O-line can stay healthy.

Also feel better about the defense, the starters all look good. I’ll feel better when we get Mike Hamlin and Jason Williams back onto the field. It’s too bad they couldn’t get a better backup for Rat, but maybe Siavii will surprise me.

The 12th man – Home field should be a big advantage this season, if the preseason crowds were any indication.

I am fired up that the team (Jerry and Stephen) made so many good moves in the right direction this off-season, and the new stadium is the cherry on top.

Training Camp '09 = Mega Thunder Dome....80 men enter, 53 men leave.

by APerfectStar on Sep 7, 2009 5:33 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well said...

and thanks for the props.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 7, 2009 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

great read!

There’s a real half-empty-glass article on the DMN that is the most bleak, pessimistic view of the Cowboys I’ve read yet.

Thanks :)

2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: 11-5

by Grady90 on Sep 8, 2009 8:24 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

In the midst of all the negativity in the media...

HERE is where we hold the line. This is where the Cowboys faithful line up side by side and stand tall in the face of adversity, the same way the Cowboys will come Sunday!!!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We may be shunned by ESPN because we are popular with the masses;

they may mock or stadium because its the best; they criticize our injured draft choices because we invested little; they disregard our WRs because they just catch the ball; they talk ugly about our QB because he’s young, talented, popular with the girls and has a better golf game; they belittle or coach because he treats men like men; they bad mouth our owner because he loves his team;

Now is the time to make them eat there word and go out and win one for the ……………….? Oh, hell nothing inspiring comes to mind.

Let me take another crack at it; Four score and seven years ago Jerry Jones brought forth a new………….. Rah Rah Rah

by bad knees on Sep 8, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing to feel good about...

We drafted Ware instead of that nutcase Shawne Merriman.

What a tool.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 10:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

5B good post, thanks for not stoking the Romo GF fire

I think turning around last years disappointment is even simpler than you describe:

If both Safety and ST play move from major Failure to Average we’ve made big strides. Either comes in at Above Average and we’ll be downright dangerous.

Throw in marginally better:
Turnover management(- giveaways, + takeaways) with better OL play and we could be elite.

None of these should be too difficult with the personnel changes you cite and the fact the performance in these areas last year was so poor – the bar is simply so low that the potential for success is realistic. Gone are the players that put self in front of team, gone are the projects, wannabes or has beens that simply couldn’t get it done on the field.

The 7th Rule of "Fight Club": Fights will go on as long as they have to.

by tdships on Sep 8, 2009 11:27 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I like

…“Turnover Management”.

I think that could be a new coined phrase.

Meanwhile, I’m skeptical that marginal improvement will do us much good. Specials has to get significantly better in terms of punt and kick coverage/returns.

Joe D needs to blow up!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 3:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think both

special teams and penalties need to improve significantly.

"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin

by 24Hz on Sep 8, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think special teams will

penalties..unfortunately…maybe not. I doubt we’ll see as many PIs, but in terms of oline penalties..i have zero faith they will be reduced.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Brooking is good for one unneccessary roughness per game

…which is fine with me!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 5:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

In 6 quarters of first string play this off season....

the starters amassed 15 yellow’s for a whopping 164 yards!

Ugh!

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

though i doubt it will be that bad

cause thats just unbelievable…I woudln’t be shocked if we had more than last year.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Preseason is just preseason, but...

Dallas generated one INT and no fumble recoveries in the first 3 games until our backups recorded 2 INT’s against the Vikings scrubs.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 8, 2009 6:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its REALLY hard to judge preseason

I know it doesn’t make us feel any better that we didn’t generate turnovers, but Wade ran a very vanilla defense. Its impossible to predict anything from preseason.

by foyesboys on Sep 8, 2009 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Against very vanilla offenses

Foyes, that always sounds like excuses because, purely from a relative view, our scrubs play their scrubs, our #1’s play their #1’s, our vanilla goes against their vanilla.

When people blame scheme for poor performance, it just sounds like rationalizing to me.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

some schemes are better than others

You take Lebeau away as Steelers DC, their defense isn’t as great. You’ll see that result this season with the Eagles, they will greatly miss the late Jim Johnson tremendously.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 9, 2009 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about Spagnuolo and the G-Men?

I think that could be just as big a letdown.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 10, 2009 8:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

its really not relevant

you’re basically saying “if football was played the way it isn’t, there would be reason to worry”.

For example, the Colts suck nearly every preseason but constantly come out with 11+ wins.

by foyesboys on Sep 10, 2009 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

That’s not what I am saying at all.

I have not witnessed Manning sucking in preseason. Have you? Who cares what the team record is in preseason? The point is, you CAN learn a great deal about your 1st stringers if you watch closely enough. I think games 2 and 3 provide a lot of insight.

The other aspect is that if you see the same things by the first teamers that you saw during the regular season in the previous year (penalties being a good example), it is safe to say you may have a concern there for the upcoming season.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 11, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

on the topic of turnovers

Defenses pretty much play vanilla ball in preseason. Wouldn’t you assume that, given that defenses are going vanilla, that it would be MUCH harder to create turnovers?

The starting team played for like a grand total of 60 minutes of football in preseason. That is hardly a good sample size to judge anything. Especially when you consider teams don’t use the meat of their playbooks.

by foyesboys on Sep 12, 2009 2:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

because some teams do it and some don’t.

You’d need to study why the ones that do are successful.

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 13, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

For example

the 2008 pats offense scored a total of 3 points in preseason. This is jsut one small example, I don’t feel like looking through tons of preseason stats, but there is generally no correlation between preseason play and regular season play.

I don’t think we will be a heavily penalized unit because of 60 minutes of preseason football. I think we will be because we have been heavily penalized for 3 years. If we were completely penalty free in preseason, it would not make a difference tome – i still woudl think we’d be a very penalized unit.

by foyesboys on Sep 12, 2009 2:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Our starting defenders also played great

By this logic, If teams score as little as they did against us, we’re going to win quite a few games this year.

by foyesboys on Sep 10, 2009 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that could also be a safe assumption...

why shouldn’t we believe the defense will be better without Stewart but with Brooking and Sensei?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 11, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying the defense won't be better

but they sure as heck won’t be as good as they looked this preseason.

by foyesboys on Sep 12, 2009 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Going from Fail to Avg for Safety and ST play would not be marginal

But substantial improvement. That’s my point.

The 7th Rule of "Fight Club": Fights will go on as long as they have to.

by tdships on Sep 9, 2009 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Makes sense

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 9, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm Kinda Pissed Off

The Sporting News got a bunch of HOF’ers, past coaches and some front office guys to rank the best 100 players in the NFL today.

First, Romo was conspicuously absent from the list. How can that be?

How does Michael Roos make the list? Vick was #88?Kris Dielman makes it but not Romo? Ridiculous!

Ware was #15 (highest Cowboy), Witten was 38, Bigg was 79, Gurode at 84 and Rat @ 85.

Peyton was #1.

Eli was #50.

Including Vick and not Romo? How is that possible?

"Well, we didn't block real good but we made up for it by not tackling."

- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers

by 5Blings on Sep 11, 2009 11:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

there are many more questionable picks there too

I think Favre was at 50, Gonzalez at 10, LT very high..it read to me like a list from 2005, with plavement based on career production and not recent relevant production

by foyesboys on Sep 12, 2009 2:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

that list is a complete joke

and the people who made it are morons.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Sep 13, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.
Start posting about the Cowboys »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mom_s_camera_081_small
A Special 'Thank You' to Grizz.
Small
Garrett DOES Have a Running Problem
Images_small
Playoff Chances: Week 10
Captain_small
NFL Power Rankings - Week 11 - Final Edition
Captain_small
Seven Statistical Nuggets To Take The Edge Off

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cowboys and Redskins at Dallas - A Look Back
Fox-jimmyjohnson_20_3
Are the Redskins the key to the division..?
Avatar_small
Mike Jenkins Bicep Treatment
Small
Anyone scared Watkins must play again...?
Small
It Isn't JUST About December
Small
More Witten please!!!
Arnold_small
To run, or not to run... That's Redball's dilemma

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
Winning Stats Power Rankings: Week 11
Big Cat Country
Shallow Thoughts and Aimless Musings
Battle Red Blog
Steve Slaton To Start On Monday Night

SPONSORS


Editor

Head_shot1_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Small Rafael Vela

Contributing Writers

Villaronga_small Raul Villaronga

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Landry_and_fish_small Mike Fisher