Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

How Much Do Penalties Matter -- This Year Anyway?

Is there a relationship between penalty discipline and winning?   Here are the ten least penalized teams in the NFL this year:

Img-referee-flag_medium

Team Penalties  Yards
Jaguars   67 522
Colts 71 531
Browns 74 633
Dolphins 75 595
Falcons 75 649
Chargers 76 553
Patriots 77 688
Chiefs 79 591
Steelers 80 729
Redskins 82 665

 

There seems to be some relationship between penalties and winning.  Five of the ten teams on this list are in the playoffs or in the running for a playoff spot.   You can also see the hands of Bill Parcells and Bill Belichick, as four members of that coaching tree -- Belichick himself, Tony Sparano, Todd Haley and Eric Mangini -- appear on this list.  (Anybody want to venture a guess why the list is so skewed towards the AFC?  Eight of the ten teams come from that conference.)

But check this out.  There are the ten most penalized teams this year:

Star-divide

Team Penalties Yards
Packers 114 1038
Raiders 112 890
Ravens 110 1057
Eagles 109 893
Bengals 107 819
Cowboys 104 812
Bills 103 815
Cardinals 101 810
Bears 95 801
Vikings 93 712

 

What's going on here? There are four guaranteed division winners here, two more teams guaranteed playoff berths and a seventh -- the Ravens -- which enters Sunday knowing it will advance with a win over the Raiders. 

The dirty teams are arguably performing better, or certainly no worse, than the saintly ones. 

Something strange is afoot at the NFL Circle K.

Comment 91 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

First!

to wonder if timing has anything to do with it?

by shaneshot on Jan 1, 2010 10:57 AM CST reply actions  

The timing of the penalties is what gets me.

Cowboys will be hot on a drive about to score, then a penalty stifles the momentum. Especially the ones when they had a great play nullified by a penalty.

Like to have less penalties, but if the Cowboys make up for it by moving the ball and scoring, it is a non factor.

The officiating is about as bad as I have seen it this year.

"Out of need springs desire, and out of desire springs the energy and the will to win."

by DaveTroll on Jan 1, 2010 11:40 AM CST up reply actions  

good point

it’s not how many it’s when…

"What we've got here is failure to communicate"

by angie'sdad on Jan 1, 2010 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

when we reach the redzone

its a good bet there’s a flag coming for something. I tense up and get nervous waiting after every play for the yellow flag piece to show up on the top of the screen by the score :)

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

absolutely

Never liked this argument. Just because you can overcome something doesn’t mean it never mattered in the first place. Look at it this way, if you do 5 things to piss off your lady in a day, your chances of getting laid go down, right? It can still happen of course, you can still right your wrongs, but your not doing yourself any favors. :P

Let the chips fall where they may

by sublimezg on Jan 1, 2010 11:41 AM CST up reply actions  

This is a very interesting post.

Your data shows that penalties probably don’t matter as much as we all thought. I hate the cowboy penalty problems for 2 reasons. One, it stops drives and momentum. Two, it takes the flow away from the game. Go watch a Indy or New England game, then watch us this year against the chiefs or the redskins(first time). Penalty free games have alot more flow to them and are enjoyable to watch. One of our penalty fests, is not enjoyable to watch.

by GoComets! on Jan 1, 2010 11:40 AM CST reply actions  

To me the teams that win alot are

also the most aggresive teams in the league. When you have aggresive teams , you get penalties along with that aggression.

For example : defense …….if a team is weak and plays alot of soft zone , they more than likely won’t get to many pass interference calls or roughing calls or such. Ateam that is very aggresive will get those penalties more often as they play tighter coverage and hit alot harder.

As long as its not all false starts and stupid mental penalties , then I am ok with it. If you have lineman that are aggresive that block tenaciously you will get more penalties, or if your WR actual block too they will get some calls. Its just like basketball, in that if a team is passive and don’t play tough defense , then they rarely get called for fouls cause they are usually not close enough to anyone to foul. Thats my take on it after playing many years of sports in my life. :)

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 11:48 AM CST reply actions  

Doesn't exactly follow NFL stereotype that the most disiplined teams win the most

However I can’t help but think if we were on that top list we would be averaging 6 more points a game.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Jan 1, 2010 11:57 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

which raises a question I'm investigating

I think Nick Folk’s meltdown has probably cost this team at least 2 points per game, more than penalties have.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Nick Folk

One of the biggest meltdowns of a kicker in NFL history. I mean, it’s not on a level with ‘wide right’ but he was money until something snapped his head.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Jan 1, 2010 12:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Man he was such a good kicker before all this

Odd he just bailed that fast but I still think he resurfaces in the NFL at some point and does all right. Once he failed , it was just like being in quick sand and he kept sinking each and every game mentally. Kinda like the Chuck knoblach thing at second base when he couldn’t make even a routine throw to the first baseman.

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

i bet he comes back solid next year, maybe even with the boys

i contribute the majority of his inconsistency with his off season surgery, i bet he just needs the off season work he couldn’t get due to his injury

by CowboysFan4Life on Jan 1, 2010 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

maybe his bad mechanics are due to favoring an injury

but his problems right now are mental.

Cause his misses are all over the place. If there was a consistency to his misses, i would say he’s favoring a leg, or can’t swing it properly, or lacks the strength…

But when he hooks one badly left and pushes the next one right and is lifting his head early and has no consistency to his approach kick to kick (the last two games he was whipping his leg across the ball, like a sidearmed pitcher) you know he’s fishing for something.

The guy lost his confidence completely.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed

He has the yips, like what golfers get when they can’t make 12 inch putt.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2010 7:32 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

i dont think dallas has has that many penalties lately

by dc93olson on Jan 1, 2010 11:58 AM CST reply actions  

Interesting...

I’d be curious to see how this compares to previous years. My best guess is that this year was an anomaly, but interesting nevertheless.

That aside, I look at my Eagles’ 893 penalty yards, and I get a little sick to my stomach – There’s no excuse for that many penalty yards.

by JimmyK on Jan 1, 2010 11:58 AM CST reply actions  

I wonder...

…how it would look if it were broke down by type of penalty, offense vs. defense, when they occurred in a game, etc.?

Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a s#!t about the rules?!?

by TennKen on Jan 1, 2010 12:02 PM CST reply actions  

From a gut-feel perspective

I’d guess we haven’t had as many drive-killing penalties this year, as opposed to previous years. That may explain us to a degree. We also haven’t had as many drive extending penalties that aided the opposition. Not to say we haven’t hurt ourselves, just not as much as in the past.

This is still an area of the game we should clean up. Many of our penalties, such as false starts and defensive off-sides are just a lack of discipline. The big one’s of course, are the pass interference, and defensive holding calls. I know for a fact we’ve gift wrapped some points on those this year.

The tribulations of Winter...
90% of Americans say 'OH SHIT!' before going into the ditch on a slippery road.
The other 10% are from TEXAS and they say, 'HOLD MY BEER AND WATCH THIS!!!'

by White Wolf on Jan 1, 2010 12:12 PM CST reply actions  

Excellent question

I guess my perspective is that even among the most penalized teams, there are just not that many penalties versus plays run. So chance plays a big role. Sometimes penalties can really impact and sometimes they just don’t. That might explain why some highly penalized teams are playoff contenders and others are bottom feeders.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 12:18 PM CST reply actions  

Better to look at...

…penalties by game for the Cowboys. Did we win or lose when we were more penalized? And how did that correlate with our rushing stats vs. passing?

While listening to the Stanford-Oklahoma game yesterday it was apparent that some game plans can withstand penalties while others require near-perfection. The Sooners had an aerial attack that could pick up 10 yards half of the time to bail them out. Stanford didn’t, and most Gerhardt runs couldn’t overcome a single offsides. So if your offensive game plan is 5 yards and a cloud of dust, then you better not get hit with many offensive penalties.

Thanks for the blog and Happy New Year BTB!

by remnant on Jan 1, 2010 12:19 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

well it's pretty clear that this team is a passing team

and their inability to overcome a holding penalty on the ground is why.

Look at the first Redskins game for proof. The team runs the ball almost exclusively in the first half. They’re running effectively, and then a holding penalty puts them in 1st and 20 and they can’t overcome it.

People complain that this team doesn’t run more. I think Jason Garrett is trying to stay out of 3rd down plays. I chart their drives and I see a lot of touchdown drives that look like this:

1
2
1
1
2
1
TD

Touchdown drives where the team never had a 3rd down play. I think this is be design.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:37 PM CST up reply actions  

true

"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."

Simon Noble

by dubious on Jan 1, 2010 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Dubious ...

FYI .. on the Eagles site, I went there and made a comment and a few people started crap. I first defended the Cowboys with stats and facts … Like they said stuff like Cowboys fans bandwagoning and they have been terrible the past 3 years, I pointed out Dallas is 32-15 while their Eagles were 28-18-1 …. then the name calling and more crap like that. It took me a minute before I even started the trash stuff.

But anyway, I didn’t like how a few of their guys came over to this site (before the last match up) calling names and then when the game was over, they disappeared and even took down posts on “Bleeding Green Nation”. Like I said there, if they can’t handle the heat then stay out of the kitchen. They start stuff they could not finish.

by spadesking131313 on Jan 1, 2010 5:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Here are Dallas two 1st half TD drives against Washington

Drive I.

1
2
3
1
2
1
2 – TD

Drive II

1.
2.
1.
1. – TD

That’s what a quick strike offense looks like. Two TD drives, one 3rd down play.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

And that’s why the playoff teams that are the most penalized tend to have strong passing attacks (Eagles, Packers, Bengals and to a lesser extent Cowboys and Vikings).

So there’s the question: would we be more of a rushing team if our offense could have fewer penalties? I think so. Would put far less pressure on Romo and the defense (TOP).

A thought: how has Free done vs. Columbo on penalties? How has that impacted our running game?

by remnant on Jan 1, 2010 12:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

we would definitely run the ball more

As for free vs columbo..i don’t think there has been much improvement in penalties. I’ve heard frees name called a good number of times.

The annoying thing for me is that all our lineman except gurode seem to contribute equally to penalties.

by foyesboys on Jan 1, 2010 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Free vs. Columbo:

Free has had 2 false starts and 2 holding penalties this year, 6 starts.

Columbo had 5 false starts and 1 holding penalty in 9 starts.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 1, 2010 4:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Free has allowed 1 sack, Columbo allowed 1 sack.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 1, 2010 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Much better?

I think they’re about the same.

Flozell Adams – 6 false starts, 3 holds, 3 additional penalties, 7 sacks allowed

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 1, 2010 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

For me personally

I have always been a proponent of only replacing a player if there is a better option. And as of right now, I find it hard to believe that Free isn’t a better option than Flozell “Drive Killer” Adams.

If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.

by Cowboyfan729 on Jan 1, 2010 5:56 PM CST up reply actions  

free

I would like to see Free at LT, but it is probably too late In the season to make a switch.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2010 7:42 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

it is too late

Flo is our LT for this season unless he gets hurt

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Based on what?

I’ve watched them both play, and wasn’t wowed by either one of them, but they are both solid. Neither is as dominant a run blocker as Adams.

Other than it just being what you think, do you have any actual examples where Free missed a block that Columbo would have made? Or something that shows that Free has missed a higher percentage of run blocks?

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 2, 2010 12:29 PM CST up reply actions  

He has nothing and his arguement is weak.

 Free, from what I have seen can do the job. On who is better, it depends on what you are asking of them. I give them a push in pass blocking. Against the run Columbo has a little more pop but Free is much better pulling and leading screens. I think your splitting hairs on who is better but I do like Columbos nastiness better. I like mean SOBs on the OLine.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Jan 3, 2010 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Wins and losses

I would like to see something where we can tell if we were penalized substantially more in losses as compared to wins, and if we were was it more defensive or offensive penalties. I for one believe that this team is pretty consistent on offense except for when they get a penalty early on in the drive. Maybe Garrett feels a little more restricted or something. I can recall in a few losses, that I thought we would be wins, getting holding calls on 1st downs quite a bit and that stopping drives before they even got started.

by cj89 on Jan 1, 2010 8:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I wonder if you would get a better snapshot if you got the data for penalties that occured on 3rd or 4th down.

"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."

by saidseven on Jan 1, 2010 12:20 PM CST reply actions  

Parcells believed penalties on the Defense

almost always result in the other team scoring on that drive.

Offensive penalties challenge you to overcome them: the ball is still in your court.

Defensive penalties give the other team the chance to capitalize, changing the dynamic a little bit.

I’d be interested to see this broken down squad-by-squad.

by Incredifan on Jan 1, 2010 12:36 PM CST reply actions  

Nothing will ever stop flozell from jumping offsides. its who he is. the penalties that piss me off are the ones that were a result of getting beat (usually)due to improper technique like holding penalties, block in the back(anybody who does this does not deserve a spot on an nfl roster, how dumb can you be?), illegal contact, etc.

Now penalties like delay of game, too many men on the field, illegal motion etc. are things that should not happen if the team is coached well.

by DavidLaFleur on Jan 1, 2010 12:38 PM CST reply actions  

I take the opposite view

offsides penalties are a matter of concentration, or lack of concentration. Those are the ones that drive me nuts.

If Flozell is beaten around the corner and the options are hooking the guy, taking a chance at getting flagged, or getting Romo splattered from the blind side, I’m happy to see him take option A.

You can overcome 1st and 20. You can’t overcome a broken Romo collarbone.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

and as OCC has posted a couple times

we’ve scored a td on something like 1 out of 27 drives where we’ve been sacked. So even if Romo keeps his head, our chances to score go way down when its 2nd and 17 or 3rd and 17 as opposed to 1st and 20 or 2nd and 20.

by foyesboys on Jan 1, 2010 12:50 PM CST up reply actions  

ah, you're provided the piece I've been looking for
Been researching a piece on scoring for the last hour and can't make sense of it. This is the data point I've been looking for. Thanks for reminding me.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Sort of.

On NFL Radio earlier this year, they said that you have about a 27% chance of scoring a TD on any given drive. If you take a sack, your chance of scoring a TD goes down to 7%. So, you have a 74% less chance of scoring a TD when you take a sack than you do on a typical drive. Numbers vary season to season and week to week, obviously, but they said it’s usually right in that range.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 1, 2010 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

holding penalty isn't as bad as a sack

because you get to replay the down

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Here are the stats

For the 37 offensive touchdown drives so far this season, the breakdown is as follows:

TD drives with a sack: 1 (2.7%) → 1st TD vs KC, sacked on 1st and 10 for ‘only’ -3 yards.
TD drives with penalties: 10 (27%). 3 of those drives had 2 penalties during the drive
TD drives without 3rd downs: 15 (40%). With one 3rd down: 13. With two 3rd downs: 9

Average no. of plays per TD drive: 6.7 (total plays 247)

by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 2, 2010 6:25 AM CST up reply actions  

There you go

this is NOT a ball control team. Jason Garrett knows what he has.

28 of his 37 TD drives have only one 3rd down or no 3rd downs.

Just over three quarters of his TD drives staying out of 3rd down situations.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 2, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

To go farther,

NO Dallas TD drive had more than 2 3rd downs in it.

And yet people keep calling for Dallas to pound the football.

Not this year. Not if they want to go farther than a simple playoff berth.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 2, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

+1 mental breakdowns are inexcusable.

I can live with protecting your QB or preventing a long TD. Stupidity is hard to live with.

KICK ASS every day!!!

by squidlo97 on Jan 1, 2010 2:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm echoing some other comments here...

but my opinion is that defensive penalties are killers – pass interference almost always leads to points. Pretty much every defensive penalty has a major downside – either its an automatic first or a free play (offsides). Aside from that one game when we had 4 offsides penalties in like one drive…we’ve been decent in this regard.

Offensively, its all about timing. A penalty on first down limits your abiity to run the ball, and against certain defenses, that has been a major problem. A false start has (imo) marginal impact. I looked at our offensive production versus penalties halfway through the year, and we had something like 6 false starts and scored 1 td and 3 fgs on those drives. On penalties 10 yards or longer, our scoring percentage went down through the first four games. In the second four games, there was hardly any impact – i think a lot of that had to do with the quality of opposing defense as well as miles austin’s big play impact which forced safeties deeper.

But, obviously, penalties against better defenses are more of a problem. Its hard to overcome 3rd and long against philly, for example.

by foyesboys on Jan 1, 2010 12:58 PM CST reply actions  

Penalties can be overcome

with a good, talented team that executes consistently. Weaker, less talented teams are affected much more by penalties, which is why our penalties aren’t a big worry for us IMO.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 1:05 PM CST reply actions  

Terry, dawk said that you are ban on the eagle site.

Is that right? If so what did you do to the poor philly fans? :)

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Jan 1, 2010 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

They're a sensative bunch

especially Jason who I think is a real ass.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

+1

Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a s#!t about the rules?!?

by TennKen on Jan 1, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Well did they ban you

for talking intelligent football? After all you do know that’s not allowed on bgn.

How bout dem Frogs!!!!

by DIRE WOLF on Jan 1, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

actually Jason wrote a post couple years ago

about Cowboys fans living outside of Dallas as not being real fans, I told him he was full of sh$% and talked trash on their game thread when we beat them at the Linc in 07 so he banned me.

Like I said, Jason is as sensitive as a 9 yr old school girl.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I told him he was full of sh$% and talked trash on their game thread when we beat them at the Linc in 07 so he banned me.

I’d fully expect a ban if I did that here.

by JimmyK on Jan 1, 2010 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

I remember that post by Jason

It’s when I (and anyone with a brain) lost all respect for him.

by Cowboys Dominance on Jan 1, 2010 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, it is about the only argument that they have.

Obviously no one outside of Philadelphia would ever cheer for the Eagles. And anyone who leaves Philadelphia will obviously rush to a new team in their new home, because why would you remain loyal to a team like that?

They can’t argue wins and losses, and despite their wish to do so, playoff success. Because the Cowboys have the advantage over the series history, recent history, and have had far, far more postseason success. The only thing that they can argue is that they have been able to come up short more times in the past 10 years than the Cowboys, and that few people outside of Philadelphia want to support their team.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 2, 2010 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Thank you!!

I respect you coming to my defense over there at “Bleeding Green”. As you can see Terry is saying same thing as I was. Talk intellegent football and they bash you and expect you to eat it.

Dawk and some others come here and lay smack, and we all except it and trash him and the Eagles back in good fun. …. I said Jenkins would start over Samuel and those guys started cursing and saying derogatory things expecting me to be quiet, but they got an earful of Philadelphia is a city of losing …. oh they did not like that!

But thanks!

by spadesking131313 on Jan 1, 2010 7:07 PM CST up reply actions  

+1 .. That guy a hypocrite

He took some of my posts down there after the game we won at the Linc. ……. and I’ll tell you, they all looking to ban me or curse me because I threw FACTS in their faces when they talk crap.

by spadesking131313 on Jan 1, 2010 6:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Parcells Connection

One thing that drives me nuts is the inconsistency among officiating crews. You can watch the Cowboys game and see a penalty (seems to always be at a critical time) and then watch another game and the same exact thing isn’t called. I think Parcells was sensitive to the various crews and what they watched for. I think it was part of his coaching style, I’m not sure that we have the same focus with this coaching staff.

by staubachfan on Jan 1, 2010 1:30 PM CST reply actions  

It had little to do with Parcells here

the penalties for this team have been pretty constant from the Parcells years to the Phillips years.

And that’s how its gonna be for a while.

Flozell Adams and Leonard Davis are the two most penalized, or two of the three most penalized OL in the game in recent years. (Bigg is either 2nd or 3rd).

You have to grin and bear it until they’re replaced.

Look at Sparano. His O-lines here took a lot of flags. Then he goes to Miami and has some of the least penalized teams around.

It’s the players.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 1:49 PM CST up reply actions  

well said

Once the players step on the field, coaches have no control of them, it’s all on the players then.

In Romo we Trust

by Terry on Jan 1, 2010 2:15 PM CST up reply actions  

too bad

flo and bigg are inked to big long term deals. I think we can live with bigg, but Flo kills me.

"No matter where you go, you are what you are playa"-Jay Z
Twitter Account

by Wmillion on Jan 1, 2010 7:48 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, I think the Parcells' coaching tree's placement above shows that this Cowboys team is the problem

Parcells leaves and immediately he’s helming (with Sparano) a team that’s got one of the fewest totals in the league once again. Yet in Dallas, his Cowboys teams were always near the top in penalties.

The issue is not a lack of “discipline” or any other intangible that many on these boards have exhorted over the years. Penalties are in the current roster’s DNA. They’re going to commit them regardless of fines or coaching approach or yelling at them or what not, and that will continue until the roster turns over a bit. It’s just part of this team.

Look at it as an inherent characteristic. We can no more hope for our team to be low on the most-penalized list than we can hope for Marion Barber to become a speed back or Orlando Scandrick to grow 5 inches. The penalties are inextricable from these players’ make-ups.

Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.

by Tim Wilson on Jan 2, 2010 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

12/28:

Something not discussed between the he says/she says short yardage debates:
Penalties the last 4 games, I noticed I didn’t seem to see as many, so looked them up:
5 – 30 yards
5 – 24 yds.
6 – 49 yds.
4 – 21 yds.

Not just few penalties, but a major lack of negative yardage also!

Which indicates, for one thing, not very many pass interference calls. Jenkins has made a huge difference.
(Newman looks like he’s got one more season then turns into Anthony Henry in 2011, but that’s another post.)

Overall stats for the season are still terrible, but interesting to note that along w/ the Raiders (of course) the Packers, Eagles, Bengals, and Ravens also have more penalties.

Dallas has the 8th most penalty yards in the league also-but the recent improvement has been a real reason for the improved play lately.
Not as many stupid penalties at the worst time, which indicates focus-which indicates leadership.
And I credit mostly Romo. His demeanor is completely different than earlier this year, and even more so previous seasons.

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Jan 1, 2010 1:47 PM CST reply actions  

Agree that the improvement on penalties has

helped with the Cowboys push here late.

But Newman is a good corner. Because Jenkins has been playing very good, doesn’t deminish Newman’s play. He’s been good, just not as good as Jenkins.

by spadesking131313 on Jan 1, 2010 7:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Well said

T-New is still a top CB. If they both stay healthy, the Cowboys should have one of the better starting tandems in the NFC for the next couple seasons.

Drago says, "We must break you!"

by APerfectStar on Jan 2, 2010 1:56 AM CST up reply actions  

He's good now

He’ll be good next year, barring injury.
I worry beyond that

Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009

by Realist Larry on Jan 2, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

He’s in his 30’s now, right? I know he was around 25 when he was drafted.

by illcowboy on Jan 2, 2010 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

red zone

It amount to me is not near as important because some are not as big in yardage and what downs they occur. The stat I want to see is redzone opportunities with penalties and points included. Then how many penalties occurred on 3rd down and killed drives that would be a better evaluation of the impact of penalties.

by Red Raider on Jan 1, 2010 3:09 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

It's not the penalties

it’s the sacks.

This team is pretty good, and has been pretty good, at overcoming early down penatlies, going back to the time Payton was the OC in ’05.

The difference is the lost down:
you take a hold on 1st down, it’s 1st and 20. You’ve got three downs to make it up.

You take a sack on 1st down, it’s 2nd and 18.

Dallas can often cover that ground in three plays, but not in two. I imagine that’s true for a lot fo teams.

Dallas has given up a lot of 1st down sacks this year. I’ve gone back and looked at location of sacks, and don’t find much conclusive. only two of the 32 were in a team’s red zone or pre-red zone.

Most of Dallas sacks have happened between it’s 30 and mid-field, but whether they come on 1st or 2nd downs, they’re drive killers.

Penalties, not so much.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 3:37 PM CST up reply actions  

which is why Flozell grabbing a guy who beats him isn't the worst thing in the world

He gets flagged, he saves Romo’s neck and saves the down.

He gives up the sack, his QB gets smacked hard and Dallas likely has to punt.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 3:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I can live with those if he knows he's beat.

Let Romo and the offense live to fight another battle.

by illcowboy on Jan 1, 2010 4:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Same here

If you know for a fact you are beaten, might as well get a do-over, even at the expense of 10 yards.

by cwbys4evr on Jan 1, 2010 6:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Great points

plus there is always a chance of a strip sack.

FREE THE OGLETREE!!!

by dunkman on Jan 1, 2010 4:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I was more thinking about holding plays on runs. Yeah i agree that holding(or even tripping! lol) is better than getting beat by speed in pass protection.

by DavidLaFleur on Jan 1, 2010 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

Holding on a run down is a whole other matter.

No excuse there. What’s the worst? Two, three yard loss? More than likely no gain.

So it’s 2nd and 10. I’ll take that over 1st and 20.

Some coaches fine their o-lineman for taking that penalty. I know Bill Cowher used to do it.

by Rafael Vela on Jan 1, 2010 9:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting the gap between rank 10 and rank 28 are so small

Pittsburgh ranks 9th and had only 90 less yards in penalties then teams like the Cardinals, Cowboys and Bengals which are ranked 25th-28th.

by Trey, on Jan 2, 2010 1:13 AM CST reply actions  

The steelers are an outlier on that chart

For the most part, you’re looking at ~200 yard difference between the top and bottom. I guess thats not anything too extreme, but its almost a games worth of yards.

by foyesboys on Jan 2, 2010 2:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Stats i want to see:

- Number of penatlies by Officiating crew for all NFL
- above number during cowboy games

by Cal in DC on Jan 2, 2010 2:55 AM CST reply actions  

Lies, Damn Lies, and statistics

What’s hilarious is that when faced with stats that don’t back up their perceptions, they want to look at smaller samplings, different qualifying categorization, or just disregard the stats as meaningless…cause they don’t match their long held fallacy.

Wade was crucified over his presser when he stated penalties don’t mean much when it comes to wins/lossses.

Now that he’s proven right, some still can’t admit that penalties, while exacerbating and maddening, do not determine whether you win or not.

This is a complete reversal of the long proven “turnover margin = wins” theory.

He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors. - Thomas Jefferson

by Fighter15 on Jan 2, 2010 10:43 AM CST reply actions  

I never considered penalties to be the sole factor holding back the Cowboys.

I found them to be more an indicator of overall lack of discipline and preparation, if not ability. Something those stats don’t show is the type of penalty, such as offsides, false starts, etc. The Cowboys seemed to consistently have procedural penalties over the past few years, and seemingly at the worst times. I felt like it showed a lack of accountability, team discipline, and preparation.

by Baked Potato Soup on Jan 2, 2010 1:02 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
X's and O's... More Basics... Cover 3...
Small
A LETTER TO MIKE JENKINS...
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys Athletic D-Linemen
Small
How much does pass rush matter?
Ryan_2008_small
Is Tony Romo an Elite Quaterback?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Cowboys players under 25 are more valuable than Eagles and Giants
Kegbearer_small
Battles In The Trenches: Cowboys 2012 Defensive-Fronts
Small
Simplicity, and execution... The keys to the top offense of the last Decade...
Tn48_small
Building a Defense: The Case for Morris Claiborne
Kegbearer_small
Aikman, Irvin & Emmitt Interview

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Brandon_small Brandon Worley

2012-05-23_14-43-22_987_small KD Drummond

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Contributing Writers

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dallas_cowboys_nike_gloves_small Archie Barberio

Even_better_tom_small Tom Ryle

2011_07160126_small CotySaxman

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui

Sean_lee_small NYHorn