Cowboys' "Smoke-Screens" Leave the Eagles in a Fog
Dallas offensive coordinator Jason Garrett has made the flanker-screen a staple of the Dallas offense. Since he unveiled it in the first Eagles game in early November, his Cowboys offense has run the play several times in every subsequent game.
Despite its increased use, the play remains effective. It now seems to fit into that category reserved for plays like the Packers' sweep of the '60s, the Dolphins' fullback trap in the early '70s, the Cowboys' lead draw of the '90s and the sprint option pass near the goal line for West Coast offense teams: opponents know its coming, but seem powerless to stop it. If you've glanced at the comment thread summaries OneCoolCustomer assembled (check the rec posts in the right hand column) you'll see a gaggle of frustrated Cowboys haters wondering, "they keep running that play! Why can't the Eagles stop it?"
The play succeeds because Garrett is careful to vary it in creative ways, and because he has created a set of complementary plays, which will rip a defense if they decide to overplay the screen. Here are three examples from the Cowboys opening drive Saturday night which demonstrate Garrett's stealth.
The Phantom Smoke Screen
The Cowboys, like many other teams, play alphabet soup with their personnel groupings. Watch the first dozen or so offensive plays of each game and you'll never see the same formation twice. Part of this is subterfuge; if a coordinator has special plays prepared, he will often unveil them here, when he has the advantage of surprise. The revolving formations also have a diagnositic purpose. The offense will present as many different looks as possible to get the quickest possible read on the defensive sets the DC is calling.
In this game, the early answer Garrett sought involved blitzes. The Eagles had pressured Romo relentlessly in the first matchup, but played mostly zone last week. Would Sean McDermott go back to blitzing on every play, or mix-and-match?
Garrett had his answer within three plays. He put his 13 set on the field first, with TEs Jason Witten and Martellus Bennett left and TE John Phillips in the backfield as a lead blocker. Phillips played in an off-set I right, opposite his fellow TEs. Miles Austin was the single receiver. The Eagles countered aggressively, putting all eleven men within six yards of the line of scrimmage. They put Sheldon Brown over Witten, Macho Harris over Bennett and overshifted their linebackers towards Phillips side, expecting Dallas to run that way. They read correctly, as Dallas ran the power right for Marion Barber behind Phillips and the pulling Kyle Kosier for three yards.
Dallas spread the field on the next play, with two WRs and a flexed (set wide, in the slot) Witten on the left. Roy Williams was the lone receiver on the right. Dallas again ran a safe play to guage coverage, throwing a hook to Williams, who boxed out Asante Samuel for a seven yard gain.
The Eagles rushed six on this play and on 3rd-and-5, Dallas burned a six-man Eagles blitz with a simple flare to Choice. On the previous play, Dallas had kept Marion Barber in to block, giving the Cowboys six blockers to counter the six rushers. Philly had played man-to-man with a safety deep. This time, the Eagles again sent six, and again played man, and dropped Macho Harris from their left slot into the deep middle, to provide cover for any deep throws. Instead of blocking, Choice ran a quick route, towards the side Harris was vacating with his drop. Dallas sent out five, and the Eagles had five in coverage. Harris' drop gave Tashard the space he needed to reach the first down marker on the right sideline.
On the next play, Garrett unveiled his first screen-related wrinkle. Dallas went to an empty set, meaning it had no running back in the backfield with Tony Romo. Jason Witten lined up on the right, next to Marc Colombo and three receivers, Miles Austin, Roy Williams and Kevin Ogletree, lined up wide of Witten, with Williams between the two speedsters. Patrick Crayton was alone on the left side of the formation.
An empty set is an invitation to blitz. The offense has only five blockers and a six-man rush from any direction simply overloads it. Philly seemed to take the bait. It deployed in its stock four man line, and put two linebackers in the A-gaps to each side of C Andre Gurode. It appeared pre-snap that the Eagles would run one of their familiar double-A blitzes, where they sent both LBs at Gurode, hoping one would shoot clean inside, or that a sliding protection would let one of the edge rushers loose.
But the coverage behind the six potential rushers didn't look right. If the Eagles were playing straight man, they would have matched up with every one of the five Cowboys receiving targets. However, they had FS Harris hanging out in the left flat, over Sheldon Brown, who was tightly guarding Crayton. They had only three secondary players on the left side of their defense, to cover Witten and the receivers trio. Dallas had an apparent overload on that side. The coverage looked too good to be true, and it was.
That's because the Eagles were only rushing five men, and were going to play man behind them. Harris, as he had on the other plays, dropped into his deep half. Because they were overmatched numberically, the three DBs on the left also began backpedaling just prior to the snap, giving seven-yard cushions.
At the snap, LB Will WItherspoon peeled back from one A-gap and sprinted towards Witten. The CB wide on that side dropped with Ogletree, who ran a go route. The nickel CB inside ran with Austin, who was cutting diagonally across the field. Roy Williams, meanwhile, stayed put. He was running a smoke route, where the receiver simply turns and waits for an immediate toss from the QB. This is a phantom screen, or to pun off his pattern, a smoke screen. His fellow receivers had split the coverage to his side, and Williams merely had to beat his man in space. Roy cut inside Quintin Mikel and sprinted upfield for 16 yards.
Faking One Screen for Another
While Williams play was a phanton screen, it put the flanker screen on the Eagles' collective forebrain. Three plays later, after two runs had moved Dallas to a first down near midfield, Garrett toyed with their screen-paranoia. He lined up a a 12 set, with two TEs (Witten and Phillips) and two receivers. Crayton was again split left and Austin right. Phillips was in the backfield, in an off-set I left with Felix Jones.
Witten was flexed to the right side and he attacked the corner over Austin at the snap. Austin ran two steps upfield and then cut backs toward the line of scrimmage, with his hands out. The play looked like a screen, and the Eagles treated it as such. They had lined up in their base 4-3 but at the snap both DEs dropped into the flats, while the strongside LB and the MLB rushed. The dropping DE Trent Cole found Phillips releasing into the left flat and covered him for a few yards. Sheldon Brown chased Crayton upfield, while Macho Harris dropped into the deep left half behind Brown.
Tony Romo turned right and faked a toss to Austin. The action pulled all the Eagles defenders on that side of the field towards Austin. Romo then pivoted left and threw a screen to Felix Jones, who had stayed in to chip the DT and was now releasing laterally.
The fake had cleared out the left side; only three Eagles where there -- Brown, Harris and the dropping DE Cole. When LG Kyle Kosier pulled to lead Jones, Felix had three escourts. Kosier cut Cole. Crayton stalemated Brown and Phillips raced upfield to engage Harris. Had the TE gotten one stride farther upfield he could have sealed Harris inside and given Jones a clear shot up the left sideline for a score. As it was, Phillips got enough of Harris to knock him off balance. Harris dove for Jones and while Felix leapt over him, the lunge threw the back off balance. Jones stepped out of bounds, but not until had had gained 30 yards.
This Time, the Screen is Real
Two plays later, Garrett finally called the real flanker screen, but camouflaged it so well the Eagles were unprepared. On a 2nd-and-12, Dallas went to a 12 package, two tight ends, one back and two receivers. Or so it appeared. The Cowboys threw a set of skill position players on the field the Eagles had never seen before. Sam Hurd lined up wide on the left. TE Phillips lined up in a flex position left. Austin lined up in the backfield on Romo's left in a shotgun set. He was deployed as a running back on this play. Witten was in a traditional TE spot on the right and Kevin Ogletree was split right. The Cowboys were in a two TE, three WR package, with no backs in the game.
Before the snap, Hurd motioned towards the line and stopped on the left wing, in the gap between LT Flozell Adams and the flexed Phillips. When Romo got the ball, he faked a pitchout left to Austin, behind Phillips and Hurd. The Eagles were in their nickel package, with nickel corner Joselio Hansen joining the regular secondary and lining up as the SOLB, over Witten. This looked like a 4-3, but in personnel terms it was a 4-2-5.
Phillips had been the lead blocker on all but one of the four Cowboys running plays on this drive and the Philly linebackers were using him as their run key. When Romo faked to Austin, both Eagles linebackers, both safeties and Brown, the corner to that side, chased the fake. The only Eagles on their left flank were Hansen, who was chasing Witten, and Asante Samuel, who was playing six yards off Ogletree.
The Cowboys had the Eagles badly outflanked, and when Ogletree ran his hitch and came back for Romo's toss, he had five lead blockers. Witten turned, locked on Hansen and rode him wide of the play. Marc Colombo and Leonard Davis pulled right and double-teamed Samuel. Andre Gurode blocked a safety. Ogletree appeared ready to score but was run down by Akeem Jordan at the two. Still, Dallas had a first-and-goal, or so it seemed. Witten was penalized for releasing too soon and illegally blocking downfield, wiping out the gain.
The penalty and a sack on the following play stopped this drive. Still, these plays demonstrate why Dallas' flanker screen game remains so effective. Dallas ran three variations of it, from three different formations with three different personnel groupings. The targets were different every time. Even through they have met three times this year and were meeting for the second time in a week, the Eagles defenders were confused. They knew the Cowboys were going to screen them, but never could figure out when and how the plays were coming.
The Vikings do not blitz as much, so these plays may not be as effective against them. Nevertheless, the Cowboys will use them any time they suspect a heavy blitz. If they catch a defense in a blitz, they'll burn it.
Older Cowboys fans grew up watching Tom Landry burn blitzes with all forms of running backs and tight end screens. You sometimes see the complaint that Jason Garrett does not run screens enough. Garrett has laid just as many smokescreens the last half of the season as Tom used to, only his screen packages build off his receivers. What's more, his results have replicated Landry's, leaving defenses coughing and lost.
140 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great stuff Raf
<——- Digs the screen
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:11 PM CST reply actions
That penalty on Witten...
that you mention on the first drive appeared to be complete B.S., based on the replay I saw during the game. I don’t have any game footage though…
it was the right call...
but it really wasn’t one that is a horrible penalty on Witten.
He just got there a second too soon.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:14 PM CST up reply actions
I slowed it down, and Witten did begin the block too early. Some refs let them play, others can
nitpick the game to death. Their calls were pretty tight a$$ all the way around though. Neither team had an advantage I don’t think. That call on Brown that gave us 1st & goal at the one was close and could have been a non call. Many calls were very close in the game.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
The pass was caught behind the line of scrimage
so technically it’s still a run. The was a bad call.
by I'm a Cowboy on Jan 11, 2010 7:55 PM CST up reply actions
i dont think its a run unless its a reverse lateral
almost all screens count as passes and almost all screens start from behind the LOS
The call makes sense
considering the rest of the game. They were nitty with the penalties but at least they were consistently nitty. I definitely thought they made some questionable calls, but it went both ways. The offsetting penalty on Hamlin was pretty bad imo
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
From watching the game, yeah the Hamlin call looked bogus
But there’s no telling what he was saying to Maclin at the time, might’ve crossed the line.
"Thanks Ed, good hairpiece" - Tony Romo
by robolundgren on Jan 11, 2010 11:53 PM CST up reply actions
Roy vs Ogletree
I would much rather see Ogletree catching this smoke screen than Roy.
Ogeltree is more fluid and heads upfield much faster.
Roy is all arms and legs. He has ‘flap’ his wings to get going.
Guys like Austin and Ogletree are perfect on these plays.
Go Cowboys!
there is probably some value in including Roy though
its another wrinkle for the D
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 11, 2010 2:19 PM CST up reply actions
+1........
why limit yourself? I don’t understand why some people have to bash some of our players that have been struggling even when they do something good. Hey, look at it this way. Maybe, we have discovered some new ways to get Roy involved in some plays that are more suited to his strengths.
I am no Roy fan
but it is more in the minds of the D. If KO is out there, they expect him to get the screen. So throw it to the least likely guy – slowfoot. That sets up plays to KO.
Yes, we are now at the point where I see Roy’s value as setting up plays for Ogletree.
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 11, 2010 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
Roy really hasn't been too bad once he gets the ball in his hands.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
Good offenses have a set of plays, 20-25 or so
that they run really well. This is the core of their offense.
The key to keeping a defense off balance is changing the look. You run your pet play, but from five or six different formations. That way, you maintain your level of execution, but the other guy doesn’t know it’s coming.
That’s what Dallas is doing right now with this screen and with the lead draw.
This is a great point
You execute at a high level because it’s a stock play, but you don’t telegraph it from the formation.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
OR if you really execute well, like the Colts
You disguise very little, don’t move players around at all and just make them stop you
I'm not losing my memory, I'm living in the now
Which makes me wonder about a different point
All of us are excited about Romo’s seemingly new-found ability to protect the ball this season, crediting it variously to better decision-making, the absence of TO, taking sacks instead of going for a risky play or even simply flinging it into the stands when nobody is open, take your pick.
But how much of that is down to Romo and how much is a result of better game-planning and schemes?
Now obviously you can’t gameplan less fumbles, but could the drop in INT’s also be in part a result of Garrett’s playcalling?
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 11, 2010 3:18 PM CST up reply actions
"We don't coach interceptions!"
There maybe some scheme to it – staying away from patterns that have given Romo the most trouble, or using formations that allow him the best chance of getting an accurate read. But I think it’s more likely that Romo is reading defenses better and has (in his words) adjusted a few things that are working for him. He declined to say what those were, wisely I think.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I think to agree Romo is probably putting in more input now that he's
gotten more comfortable. I think him and Garrett have gotten really good at doing what he feels comfortable doing and making a game plan based on that. Yet, I still give most credit to Tony because you can have the best coaches in the world and still suck at quarterback. Plain and simple.
Marine by trade, Cowboys fan by birth.
Romo Fumbles
Cool, I’m not sure why Romo’s interceptions are down, my gut feeling is it is because he is trying to be a little more careful with his throws. I think his fumbles are down largely because of the offensive line play. Last year’s line was a sieve allowing rushers to get in quickly. Romo would run around & try to avoid the rush but he was caught several times by players going for the strip. Best example of that is the Eagles game at the end of last year.
I also think Romo has focused some on reducing fumbles by trying to hold the ball with two hands while scrambling around. Mostly though, his fumbles, as most qb fumbles, can be put on the O line.
Some is o line
but he is looking much smarter with the ball. When he senses the rush he is way more prone to tuck the ball.
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 11, 2010 8:37 PM CST up reply actions
Yep,
alot of his fumbles were him always trying to make a play, now his is way more content to take a sack.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 9:18 PM CST up reply actions
actually........
you could compare the old Romo to Aaron Rodgers. A good example would be the last play of the game yesterday against Arizona. The old Romo would have done what Rodgers did yesterday. Hold on to the ball too long and try to make a play instead of just taking a sack..
That's just one play
Rodgers’ INT rate was the best in the league. He’s an excellent quarterback.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
oh I'm not saying he's not a great QB.......
but he does hang on to the ball too long sometimes trying to make a big play instead of taking what the defense gives you (very much like Romo was in the past.) He also has a tendency to hold the ball too low where it can be swiped. He’s a young guy and he will improve but I do see some similarities between Rodgers and Romo.
Tied with Favre, half a step ahead of Romo.
All of them were outstanding protecting the ball this year.
"I hope they become a 'Doomsday'. I hope they consider this bunch better than any of the other ones. I want them to do well. I want people to say they're better than the group I played with. That would make me very happy." -Randy White
by Big D Bam Bam on Jan 12, 2010 11:50 AM CST up reply actions
you have to take luck into account as well
how many dropped interceptions have we seen in the past few weeks? they weren’t always Romo’s fault tho, like the slant to Williams where he didn’t get his hands up quick enough. Either way, there have been quite a few dropped picks that maybe in the past weren’t getting dropped.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Yep...
but it’s the ones he can control that are the most frustrating. Peyton Manning has said that a good indication of a good QB is having less than 10 interceptions. He didn’t go into great detail, but I tend to believe that pics will happen, deflections at the line, ball that bounce off feet and land into the defenders arms, etc.
But if you eliminate the ones you can control, you go from 15+ to less than 10 and that could very well translate into 3 or 4 more wins in a season.
Except for his slip it went ok for him.
I liked Romo getting him involved early. That got him Tony in a rhythm and made the defense worry about someone who up to that point was a non factor.
Marine by trade, Cowboys fan by birth.
that's because they are much younger, can catch with their hands as opposed to cradling the ball near their chests and can run like deer.
"Drew is a winner"....Roger Staubach
thanks
I made that mistake once and caught it in the read through.
Seems I did it twice.
Dallas needs to open up the playbook for Minnesota this weekend!
A team can not live by the flanker screen alone. The Vikings are going to prepare for this play all week. We need to be ready to fake this play, and then run something completely different to take advantage of this. I’d like to see a fake flanker screen, fake delayed draw, with a deep bomb to Austin on the other side! Now that would knock their socks off.
uh, they did run a fake flanker screen
it was the big play to Felix.
Uh, no
that was a double screen. And it worked.
+100
Next Sunday is the NFC Championship. Winner should roll over either NO or Phoenix (though I thought the same thing of last year’s divisional round between NYG and Philly).
by JimmyJohnson on Jan 11, 2010 5:33 PM CST up reply actions
Nope
Brees, Favre and Warner – that’s quite a lineup of QB’s left, and some of the most potent offenses in the league. There are no more easy-outs.
Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him. - Bruce Lee
With Romo all vets; whereas the AFC features younguns in Flacco and Sanchez.
Makes you wonder how they’ll fare against the peaking Rivers and master-of-commanders Manning.
You’re the Best! Around! Nothing’s gonna ever keep you down...
You’re the Best! Around! Nothing’s gonna ever keep you dow-ow-ow-own!
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 11, 2010 8:02 PM CST up reply actions
running game + defense
Baltimore and Jets both have to run well to win – based on recent performance I wouldn’t expect too much out of Sanchize/Flacco. It’s going to be the Rice/McGahee and Greene/Jones show for either team to have a chance….
Both Jets and Ravens have good defenses – but are they good enough to shut down Rivers and Manning? Should be fun games to watch.
Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him. - Bruce Lee
My biggest worry isn't even in the NFC...
This defense is playing lites out!! 16 sacks/8TOs in 4 games, After they hit Favre a few times,he’ll get loose with the ball. AD is a beast but he does have a penchant for putting the ball on the ground and you see how many "Boys are around the QBs and ballcarriers at the end of the play….It’s weird if you look at how a pack of wolves hunt,QBs see them coming from everywhere and get happy feet,start throwing early,high,behind or they try to run,McNabb tried to run and was flushed out for the kill. Our coverage has been pretty good,so they’ll get some balls bouncin’ their way.
But this team didn’t get here by accident and I think our matchups are better…Nobody has covered Witten all season,Jones seems to have his cat legs back,Choice is…you know Garrett has thrown 2 more targets into the fray with Tree and Phillips. And I honestly can see Hurd&Bennett getting a few balls.
Or even....
A flanker screen where the WR throws the ball back to Romo, and then Romo bombs it deep, or hands it off — depending on his read down field. Haven’t seen them try that all year!
I'd rather...
not have to use any plays like that.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
chill down my spine
I hate the lateral passes – a receiver drops them, acts like it is incomplete and a CB grabs it while being chased by fat linemen
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 11, 2010 2:23 PM CST up reply actions
lol i didnt realize our team was desparate for points
if we execute and keep stupid penalties to a minimum we will be fine. This team will always go as far as the defense, so I don’t think Garrett is pressing to find trick plays (a la Philly) to put 7 points on the board.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Exactly, execute the plays that are called and you will be fine.
At this point either you are good enough to go on or not. The coaches have to put them in position, but the players still have to execute their assignment.
"Brett Favre is the best quarter back to play since Roger Goodell" my cube mate. UGHHH
I am amazed...
How confident 90% of the Viking fans are over on their board.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:23 PM CST reply actions
Yeah I'm not worried...
I just find it odd. I mean I don’t think that the Vikings are going to be a walk in the park, but I can’t envision myself being a Viking fan and super confident.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
I have this feeling..
..that after the first pop by Ware/Spencer, Favre will be out of the game.
FEAR the STAR.
"You have been banned from Bleeding Green Nation" -JasonB
I don't know..
those roids have kept him strong all year
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
I understand you obviously don't like Favre......
but don’t go accusing him of steroids. That’s just not right unless you know him personally.
So if you know him personally,
you can accuse him of roids… What if you are a casual acquaintence? Adultery?
I remember them being like this in '98, when they were 15-1
their players even recorded their own version of the Super Bowl Shuffle, a la the ’85 Bears.
LOL. Nobody remembers that, because the Falcons stole their candy.
I'd even understand that...
but this their team hasn’t done alot to just pour confidence out of it’s pores.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:26 PM CST up reply actions
Blah
no this before their.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
They did win 14 games
That’s pretty good reason to be confident IMO
Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him. - Bruce Lee
My bad
12 games – still good reason to be confident
Forget about winning and losing; forget about pride and pain. Let your opponent graze your skin and you smash into his flesh; let him smash into your flesh and you fracture his bones; let him fracture your bones and you take his life. Do not be concerned with escaping safely - lay your life before him. - Bruce Lee
How have they played lately?
Confidence that you CAN win, and you WILL win is different.
Those fans are acting like it’s just going to be a walkover.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 9:20 PM CST up reply actions
kinda like some of our homers............
that are already wondering if we’ll be playing AZ or NO. Hopefully the team isn’t looking past Minn like some fans. I find it very fascinating that nobody (I’m talking media guys like Jimmy Johnson, Bradshaw,Howie Long etc. didn’t give Arizona a chance. I thought that they had to potential to beat GB if they played their A game. Just goes to show how little anyone really knows doesn’t it?
Yeah, I sit next to a Minn fan at work.
Neither one of us are talking it up much. We have pretty much decided that the winner will represent in the Super Bowl though.
"Brett Favre is the best quarter back to play since Roger Goodell" my cube mate. UGHHH
I think it is good that we are playing Favre and the Vikes...
I think we might be overconfident about another team, but considering our past success against Favre, and how close we played the Vikes 2 years ago without him, I think the players will be locked in and focused.
They are still sad about the 70's...
So maybe we give them a little rope.
wasn't wade the DC in atlanta when they dash their hopes...
I don't need a compass to know which way the wind shines....
by hashishkabob on Jan 11, 2010 5:55 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Oooooo....
has it been leaked to youtube? I’d want to watch that.
I don't begrudge them that...
I think we will win, but I think the Cowboys can lose and I certainly am running through all the scenarios in my mind.
The WR screen has been working well so far
which is great….I do seem to recall last year that it SUCKED. Maybe that’s because Ogletree was still in college and Austin was banged up all season long. But man, I remember Garrett calling WR screens to #11 and having them stopped cold repeatedly. They ended the Ravens game with a 4th and short WR screen to #11 going for a loss. I think #11 finished the season (I know he was hurting too) with 6 catches for 21 yards over the last four games. Yikes. So happy that it is working better in 2009-10.
I still could use some more RB screens, though!
Not too much did work last year.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 11, 2010 4:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Ogletree on the WR screen has been very effective and I would like to see more of it...
the one time they did with RW he slipped, which shouldve been a TD if he couldve stayed on his feet…. More Ogletree I say!!!
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
I like the play,
but I worry that if someone gets a read on it, then you will be seeing six points in the other direction.
Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a s#!t about the rules?!?
That's a concern on every play.
"Brett Favre is the best quarter back to play since Roger Goodell" my cube mate. UGHHH
If it was that big of a problem, just move the Cb's up to the line of scrimmage.
If the CB is playing tight, then you look for another play.
Our best plays have been the ones that cover our weaknesses.
I think Philadelphia has proven over the years that pur line cannot protect the qb very well against the blitz…….we may have a strong bunch but I don’t think they’re quick. We’ve done much better calling those WR screens, WR Slants…..Romo can get rid of the ball quickly, it’s a shorter pass with a higher % chance of being completed and against the blitz, those could go a long way and they have been going a long way.
Just keep doing that…….I do not need to see the WR pass from Crayton to Miles for 85 yards and a TD, nor a flea flicker or any of that stuff…..there is simply no need for that and our line does not do well with it.
As long as our D stays strong, our QB keeps playing solid without the desperate throws (he had just one this week, called back thankfully, he should know better to throw it away there or take the sack) and we limit our O penalties to say…..3 to 4 instead of 10….we could be special.
I agree, I think this is why they run the smoke routes and slants
to keep the defense off balance and unable to blitz. Great counter-move, Jason.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Looks like Jason did a little work in the off season.
Pittsburg, Philly & Baltimore killed them with the blitz last year. They had no solution.
But in fairness
Nothing works very well when Procter is your LG, Romo and Witten are injured, and MBIII and Felix are already thinking about next season…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
And your LT has one good arm
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 12, 2010 4:38 AM CST up reply actions
Yep, we weren't a great team last year...
which is why we lost those close games. But this year… this year will hopefully be different.
The fake WR screen, then pivot to set up the screen to Felix on the other side...
was a thing of beauty. Beautiful play call, and beautiful execution. Romo is doing a fantastic job of using everything at his disposal – shoulder shrugs, pump fakes, eye fakes, etc. – to sell the plays the way they need to be sold.
Raf - a question about identifying personnel groupings.
Twice you labeled a 2 TE, 1 RB personnel group, when everything I’ve been told and everything I’ve read says that a 12 group, What gives?
As a Giants fan...
I have to say , you guys are looking like the Giants team of ’07. A great defense getting pressure on the quarterback, a young QB playing the best ball of his life at the right time, and winning the games no one expects you to win (ie beating New Orleans, then the Eagles…twice).
Of course, I can’t root for you any longer, but I was pulling for you guys on Sunday just so the Eagles can continue to be one of the teams still WITHOUT a Super Bowl win and the only team in the NFC East without a Super Bowl win.
Hey, WGACA. I rooted for the Giants in the SB because I really thought they were going to win, and for the
very reasons you state in you post.
Family, Friends, Cowboys, Beer & BBQ. Life is good!
I disagree with your QB analysis
Romo is a much better QB than Manning.
I will admit that in 2007 his play was at the same level as his brother, but for his career he’s 79 QB rating falls well short of Romo’s 93.
by I'm a Cowboy on Jan 11, 2010 8:33 PM CST up reply actions
His analysis was that Romo is playing the best ball of his career, which I do not think there is any argument about, is there?
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
I rooted for the Giants in that Super Bowl just because I wanted someone to shut up those Massholes.
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
Totallly agree.
But I’m hoping that our playoff lives doesn’t depend on how much stick’em our Wr has on their glove/helmet.
I love the fact that...
the two worst loss’s in Eagle’s postseason history are from Dallas.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 4:20 PM CST reply actions
I agree, this play has worked wonders against Philly...
but I seem to recall them running this play and it not working very well in other games. The 2nd Giants game comes to mind. I just remember it getting stopped almost immediately for a loss and cursing my TV why Garrett kept calling it. Might not have been the same play, or maybe I’m just remembering the bad ones!
If you call it and they don't blitz or they read it PRE snap
It’s an ugly play.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 11, 2010 5:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
This line worries me
The Vikings do not blitz as much, so these plays may not be as effective against them
This D will be a whole different animal, especially against the run
Not blitzing plays right into Romo's hands
when they send 4 Romo can typically avoid them even if our Oline gets beat… and our WRs are all trained to improvise when their route ends, w/ out blitzing I don’t think Romo can be beat
"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards
by nicholas.rodriguez on Jan 11, 2010 6:00 PM CST up reply actions
Strong DL’s dont really give our guys trouble, its the speed rushers that kill us. Put Phillips or Bennett over on Flo’s side to give him help with Jared Allen and our WR and Witten will kill the Vikings mediocre secondary.
Bloody Elbow guys: I'm bob0912 on MMA Playground
i hope vujacic gets hit by a truck hauling stray cats that claw his eyes out before using his skull as a brood den.--kalone
yeah I figured
we can pass on them with time. Hopefully we can get some kind of running game going too.
Agreed
I think the Vikes are a lot more worried about getting pressure on Romo than Garrett is on them not blitzing. Look what we did against Philly when they sat back.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Great great article,
May I suggest using this in next years Maple Street press 2nd annual Cowboy annual. This is the kinda stuff you can’t get else where an is very entertaining and informative. It will be old news to us but could have a strong effect on new guys. He’ll I’ll be ready to read it again in the post SB annual.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 11, 2010 5:51 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Need to get Felix more involved in the passing game.....
Not just on screens either — But when Romo sees zone — Felix needs to flare out and up into a hole in the zone. Will work very well! Also when Romo sees major blitz — Have Felix run a streak or post from the back position. Yikes!
Landry would send Preston Pearson deep.
Preston was the 3rd down back and was great in screen plays but he would often run a route past the 1st down marker or occasionally go deep.
I agree
or how about Felix on the WR screen.
by I'm a Cowboy on Jan 11, 2010 9:06 PM CST up reply actions
Smoke screen = Jason Garrett's subterfuge vs blitzing defenses...LOVE IT!
You’re the Best! Around! Nothing’s gonna ever keep you down...
You’re the Best! Around! Nothing’s gonna ever keep you dow-ow-ow-own!
Favre took steroids
Yeah, I said it.
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
Yeah... come on man....
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 11, 2010 10:03 PM CST up reply actions
Look man I'm one of the first to say farvarvr is overrated,
but come on.
Is your last name Jackson?
by I'm a Cowboy on Jan 11, 2010 10:27 PM CST up reply actions
I agree
Corticosteroids – for inflammation :)
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 12, 2010 4:42 AM CST up reply actions
I wish he would start doing movies again...
He was great in Something about Mary. I’m hoping he is cast as a teenage Peter Parker in the new Spiderman movie. Ohhh to dream.
Nah, Wolverine in the X-Men 4 "Why aren't these people dead yet?"
"Brett Favre is the best quarter back to play since Roger Goodell" my cube mate. UGHHH
From Raf’s post:
“Even through they have met three times this year and were meeting for the second time in a week, the Eagles defenders were confused.”
That’s the most impressive thing Garrett has done, to me. He completely worked over the Eagles, despite them having TWO games worth of film on him against their defense.
Larry Allen benched 700 pounds. That is Leonard Davis times two.
Excellent explanation Raf
I hope Leslie Frasier doesn’t get a look at your dissection of the WR screens before Sunday’s game.
Drago says, "We must break you!"

by 



















