Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tim Wakefield Retires

Thinking out loud... Or is it writing out loud? It's a noisy keyboard...

Retaining Wade Phillips is the right call.

In the dawn of the previous year and during the course of the season, Jerry swallowed his ego and made some moves that were uncharacteristic of him, cleaning the locker room (Owens, AJones, Tank Johnson and Ellis) and signing a few Free Agents that screamed "Wade guys" (Brooking, Olshansky and Sensabaugh) on Defense were the 2 biggest moves in my mind. The moves paid big dividends and the Defense became a Playoff caliber kind.

That's the reason behind him being at the head of the Franchise that we follow. Sadly the Offense failed the Defense and now the focus needs to be placed over there.

It's the only call that makes sense, if you think it through.

 

Is the redheaded a genius or a dork? Neither, he's a scapegoat.

The people against him are willing to point at him being predictable and whatever... But if your hands are tied behind your back, what can you really do?

What do we know of the Offense after 18 games? Romo is capable of taking better care of the ball. Witten is still Witten. Austin is a number 1. Crayton is a really good option in the slot. We want to see more of that Felix Jones fellow. And the OLine makes the Offense predictable.

The guys up front can't pass protect consistently. We heard in the offseason about being Romo friendly... After the season, guess what am I making from those comments? They wanted him releasing the ball faster. How much bombs (attempts for more than 20 yards, 20 yards in the air, not YAC) did he threw? Around 10? And how many times was he sacked? That, right there, is being Romo friendly.

The guys up front can't make certain types of run blocks and aren't consistent in those that they can. We all know now about the OLine not being a power blocking one, about how they're better on the move and about how anything other than proper execution can be the difference between a long run, a short gain or a tackle for a loss in the kind of plays that they can do.

You want an Offense that is less predictable? It all starts up front, you just have to play with what you have and the Cowboys are predictable because that's the best that they can be.

 

What to do about the OLine?

Kosier won't be a Cowboy next year, that's the easy choice, but who's going to take his place? The Cowboys don't know and they should act accordingly. Hope isn't a plan, and as such, they can't trust that Brewster is going to take his place without hiccups, or that Holland will suddenly emerge from his suckitude.

And that's where things become complicated, how many players will the Cowboys want to replace from the starting lineup? 2? 3? We know that Free can play in this League, but where? Kosier and one of the Tackles may be on their way off the team, that makes 2 possible new starters. And if the Front Office gets their way, we could very well talk about 3 new starters.

But who's going to back up the new starter(s)? It isn't just a matter of finding starters, if you find them, who's going to play the backup position? That's why we, the draft a bunch of OLineman proponents, want several OLineman drafted and at least 2 as high as possible.

 

The Safeties can't make plays.

I didn't liked to see Sensabaugh miss that barely over his shoulder TD, but I've seen some guys commenting that the Safeties suck... Well, that's certainly not true, they probably did what they were told, and that's exactly what you want when you're playing the kind of QB that Favre still is, a play action expert that can fool Safeties that are spying him.

You want your Safeties looking at their man, Wade Phillips likes his Safeties looking at their asignment, that's the diference between allowing many plays in a season and allowing few in the next.

The level of play from the Safeties improved leaps, you don't become a top Defense in points allowed with a couple of bad safeties.

Now, if the Cowboys find a Safety that can cover his man AND make plays on the ball...

 

If someone makes an offer, would you bite?

I'm talking about Tashard Choice or Orlando Scandrick, if someone brings a proposal to the Cowboys about a high 2nd Rounder for one of them, would you jump? Talent at RB is easier to find, but talent at CB is rare, especially guys that can play the slot, but it's harder to find Franchise OTs... A high 2nd Rounder would give the Cowboys ammunition to trade up to the mid 10s and Draft one of the talented LT prospects out there.

Tashard Choice / Orlando Scandrick + 1st Round -----> Brian Bulaga?

I don't know if I would jump for it, but I do know that I would give it a long hard thought.

 

What do you guys think?

Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.

Comment 39 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree for the most part

But I wouldn’t trade Scandrick for anything other than a 1st. We need that depth at CB.

RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 18, 2010 10:02 PM CST reply actions  

I agree, I think that I wouldn't do it...

But you should go deeper than just having 3 quality CBs…

Think about having 2 young quality CBs and having 1 young Tackle whose quality is arguable… The Tackle position is as big a hole as the size of it’s players.

That’s all that I need to hesitate.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:14 AM CST up reply actions  

But if you traded Scandrick

you would lose the depth we have and wouldn’t have those 2 young quality corners. I dont understand why you would want to make that trade.

RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 19, 2010 12:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Because it’s easier to find a CB that can play the slot than a Franchise Tackle. The Cowboys know that, and quite well.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Scandrick has to stay...depth is important...

I'm a Eagles fan cause my daddy said so,and he likes losers!!

by UTexan on Jan 19, 2010 1:44 AM CST up reply actions  

I would be way more willing to let MB3 go than Choice though...no?

I'm a Eagles fan cause my daddy said so,and he likes losers!!

by UTexan on Jan 19, 2010 12:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Personally

I wouldn’t want to get rid of either. Its highly likely one of our RBs missed time next season, so I like having three quality guys.

RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 19, 2010 12:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I agree but, if I had to let one go it would be MB3 and then pick up another young RB.

Or even a Daryl Johnston style FB would be great (IMO). Boy I miss those days….It was so freaking awesome MOOOOOOSE!!

Running (very little)
Receiving (not bad)
Blocking (great!)

I'm a Eagles fan cause my daddy said so,and he likes losers!!

by UTexan on Jan 19, 2010 1:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed

RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.

by aussie_cowboy on Jan 19, 2010 2:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Thats what I love about BTB!!! At each others throats in one area and supporting in another!!

I want to let you know there is really nothing truly personal when we argue. Its all fun for me. Plus, I am very strong in my convictions and tend to stay by them until I am given factual information disproving them. And I tend to base my positions of irrefutable facts.
If I ever give you too much of a hard time you can make fun of the fact that I am also a professional scrabble player…..lol

I'm a Eagles fan cause my daddy said so,and he likes losers!!

by UTexan on Jan 19, 2010 2:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Wouldn't do it for Scandrick

Would consider Choice, just because it seems he only gets his playing time when others are injured, and doesn’t seem positioned to win more playing time (because if he hasn’t earned more playing time compared to the other two RBs, he’s not going to. Barber has a fairly long contract so it seems Barber and Jones seems to be the way the Boys go. But I just know that wherever Choice eventually goes, he’s going to have a helluva career.

by tyhall on Jan 18, 2010 11:09 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Scandrick needs to stay. We have no depth behind him and he should continue to get better. Bulaga is an interesting player but I doubt we would have to move up far to get him. Some scouts are really high on him and having going anywhere from 10-15, saying that he has great athleticism and huge potential. Others say that is very raw and has a high bust potential, even comparing him to Robert Gallary.
I wouldn’t trade Choice either. Barber and Jones have injury questions and Choice already has a great grasp of the offense. If we could get rid of anyone it would be Barber. With the way he runs I don’t see him being a productive player for more than 2 or 3 more years.

by jack dein on Jan 18, 2010 11:40 PM CST reply actions  

Regarding Choice, this is my opinion

Barber is a better compliment to Felix, he’s a more powerful runner, has better vision and is as good a pass catcher than Choice, who’s faster and quicker.

Now, you want to say that Choice has been looking better in the past 2 seasons? I have to agree, but how much of that is due to not having an OLine that is known for it’s power run blocking?

Let’s give this a twist, with the current OLine, who would be a better fit? A young, in his prime, Emmitt Smith? Or a young, in his prime, Barry Sanders? It’s an extremely easy choice, and I loved Emmitt, but Sanders would look better.

If the Front Office indeed makes the moves to improve the power blocking, Barber will again makes us remember his “old” self.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:22 AM CST up reply actions  

I’m not sure running the ball is our lines biggest problem. For the most part we ran the ball well all season. Our line struggled in pass blocking most of the season and would have looked much worse had Romo not been so elusive. I would like to keep all 3 together in the backfield. Like I said above my biggest problem with Barber is that I just don’t think that he will play a full season again. He takes to many hits and with age will come more injuries.

by jack dein on Jan 19, 2010 12:31 AM CST up reply actions  

It’s indeed one of the problems.

The awfulness of the power blocking makes the team predictable, teams know the kind of plays that they’re going to run and they train to stop those. This didn’t work for Philly, because Brown is their only back seven player that can tackle in a consistent basis. But teams that can tackle well, can stop the Cowboys.

And that’s the problem, the running game is all about the big plays, it isn’t about consistency, they aren’t consistent. The big plays make the numbers look good, but they are poor. If you take the big plays out of the playbook, the team becomes pass happy, because they can’t make the little running plays that are the difference.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:39 AM CST up reply actions  

Disagree about Barber necessarily having better vision.

Although that’s probably not the easiest category to judge; especially given Choice’s limited sampling size. I’d call that area of their respective games a wash. And even if Barber does have better vision, Choice definitely seems smoother and quicker when it comes to getting through a running lane. AlsoChoice certainly has better breakaway speed once he breaks free. Of course, now that it comes to light Barber has been playing at basically 85 percent of his normal self I really can’t blame his for being incapable of breaking off any long runs this season.

As for the hypothetical trade scenario; I think you’d have to trade Choice. As you stated you can find good running backs in the mid-to-late portion of the draft. Besides that, if Barber is able to get healthy again Choice surely will be used even more sparsely than he was this season if Garrett wasn’t even willing to dole out more carries to him instead of an 85 percent Barber.

Scandrick, though? That’s a tough one because of the importance of corner depth.

by MadMick on Jan 19, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, that's my opinion...

We know that Choice is faster and quicker, and still I’ve seen him incapable of finding a hole and taking a loss of yardage more consistently than Barber… Is it vision? Instincts? Or just desire to continue to move forward? Barber has more of that, and therefore he’s a better compliment for Felix.

You know the saying… Opinions are like… And I have mine!

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 1:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I respect your opinion.

Honestly, I’m blanking on recalling that many plays where Choice has gotten stopped behind the line. Of course, I realize it’s happened. Even Felix gets stopped behind the line every now and again. I just haven’t noticed Julius Jones type indecisiveness or "pitiful pitter patter" out of Choice yet. The coaching staff certainly must trust his knack for finding the crease in defenses or else he wouldn’t be the guy taking snaps out of the wildcat formation. Don’t you think so?

Besides……
 
It certainly seems like a highly, highly dubious claim to suggest he gets stopped behind the line a higher percentage of his rushes than Barber does. Barber is of course infamous for being 27 yards away from a 1,000-yard season heading into the season finale against the Redskins back in ‘07. How close did he get to achieving that milestone? Hint: he ended up farther away from 1,000 yards at the finish of that game than he did at the start.

I don’t really have a dog in the whole Choice/Barber fight. Felix is the special player out of the trio; the kind of special ability that changes games. The other two guys are equally expendable and/or replaceable. Anthony Dixon who regularly hammered SEC defenses would provide the same type of power and barbaric style Barber has regularly wowed us all with.

Just out of curiosity, would you be opposed to giving up Barber in the same hypothetical trade scenario you suggest for Choice?

As I’ve said before, I think the love affair many of us have as a fan base with Barber is the same kind of infatuation Bucs fans had with Mike Alstott. Football is a business though and Barber is an all too often banged up powerback with fumble issues. Yes, that’s right, I’m still sore about his fumble that basically gave the Giants life in our last game against them and turned that game in their favor. And a few weeks before that he had a clumsy fumble against the Redskins that snuffed out a red zone drive.

Strictly from a business standpoint, the battle-fatigued Barber is every bit as expendable as the younger fresher Choice. Personally I truly don’t mind trading either of these guys. I use personally because Barber’s fan club seems to take it personal anytime someone suggests Choice is his equal and I don’t get that because it’s backed by absolutely nothing. Barber has yet to show he’s a 1,000 yard rusher much less a franchise running back. Oh, he’s been injured. Hey, I’m sure Kijana Carter could’ve been a 1,500 yard back were it not for his unfortunate injuries.

I like Barber’s style but suggesting he’s far superior to the kid Choice without having seen enough of Choice reeks of fanboyism.

I’m certainly not calling you a fanboy, Chandus. I enjoy your well-researched posts. But I just don’t think we’ve seen enough of Choice to say what he CAN’T do. Eh, bottom line: it’s most likely not an issue this offseason but will be next offseason.

I don’t like the bum rap Barber gets because it’s the coaches place to keep him off the field if he’s less than 100 percent. On the other hand, unless Choice is just awful in pass protection I don’t know why he’d see less action than an apparently 85 percent Barber.

by MadMick on Jan 19, 2010 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, I actually reviewed every running play in the first half of the year...

… And I’ll do a full review of the year somewhere in the future…

Type of plays run, yardage, success percentage, etc.

From the first half of the year I can certainly tell you that Barber was more effective, not in breaking long runs and the factor that follows (yards per carry), but yes in success pct (carries that go for more than 3 yards).

2nd. Barber isn’t tradeable, his salary makes him untradeable… A team won’t give up something valuable and also take over his salary, it just won’t happen.

And 3rd. My opinion has everything to do with the OLine, if the team indeed makes an effor to improve the power blocking along the Line, a back like Barber becomes more effective. You just have to look at the Jets OLine and the Giants OLine of past years… Can they dominate opponents in smashmouth running plays? Yes. They have players that can pull and block effectively in the 2nd level? Yes. The Cowboys? They can pull, but their power blocking sucks…

The culprits you ask? Inconsistency from Gurode, Davis and Flo. Lack of power from Kosier. There’s only one OLineman that run blocked consistently in 2008 in every type of play and he won the Offense MVP. Unfortunatelly his play dropped somewhat this year, even before his injury, which has me questioning if he has much of a future…

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Let me be the first to sincerely thank you, brother...

For going through that kind of strenuous tape review.

I probably haven’t made it clear in my posts but I do realize that Barber simply isn’t tradeable because of his salary. That’s fine by me. My biggest problem isn’t even with him. It’s with this coaching staff that is unwilling to hand the ball to healthier back-ups.

Also I’ve said before that Barber could be every bit the 5 YPC back Jacobs was for the Giants in ‘08 behind that kind of elite O-line. But that’s sort of the point because a lot of good backs could average 5 YPC as a starter behind a line as great as the one the Giants possess.

I wholeheartedly agree with you about the inconsistency of the line. My point was more along the lines that if Felix is a great feature back you really don’t lose anything with Choice as the other back as opposed to Barber.

by MadMick on Jan 20, 2010 2:28 AM CST up reply actions  

I do realize that Choice was a total non-entity against a very mediocre Broncos defense.

But you can’t isolate that one performance and ignore his man-sized effort in December of ’08 against a Steelers defense that was possibly one of the top five greatest defenses of all time.

by MadMick on Jan 20, 2010 2:33 AM CST up reply actions  

As much as I've loved Choices contributions the last two years

he is easily replaceable on the roster. and thats no knock on him, just a state of the running back situation in the league and college. no way I give up scandrick… we need to get MORE top flight corners. At least 1.

2009 BTB Part Deux Fantasy League Champion. 'Kill Everybody 13-2'. KDP knows football.

by KD Drummond on Jan 18, 2010 11:46 PM CST reply actions  

Scandrick stays

and I’m not too sure Bulaga would start right away anyways, Y give up 2 good players to move up to grab him when Charles Brown is another athletic OT that we could get right where we are at, his cons is not enough strength cuz he came into USC as a TE, Ex-TEs when they blossom right make GREAT LTs

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Jan 18, 2010 11:48 PM CST reply actions  

just ask Seattle

and Walter Jones

"We play to win the game" - Herm Edwards

by nicholas.rodriguez on Jan 18, 2010 11:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Why throw Kosier under the bus

he only gave up 1 sack all year. And if he was ALL THAT BAD, why didn’t the coaches start Brewster or Holland in his place?

by BishopWest on Jan 18, 2010 11:55 PM CST reply actions  

Brewster missed the season due to injury and Holland is very out of shape, plus he was inactive all season.

by jack dein on Jan 19, 2010 12:05 AM CST up reply actions  

BTW

After the 2006 and 2007 seasons, I was one of the few guys that valued Kosier’s contributions to the team, I was a Kosier fan, and wasn’t surprized to see the unit struggle without him in 2008, but his deficiencies are there for all to see.

You can find a better player.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I don’t think he’s a bad player either I was just pointing out why the other two didn’t play. Last season when he was injured we learned how valuable he can be.

by jack dein on Jan 19, 2010 12:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Because he is what he is

He has no power run blocking and has no power in pass protection, he’s always getting himself pushed waaay back and he’s always eroding as the season wears him down.

You just have to look at his QB pressures allowed, in the first 8 games he allowed 6, in the last 8 he allowed 19.

He’s what he is, a good pulling Guard, but I want a guy that has some power and that can pull.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Jan 19, 2010 12:09 AM CST up reply actions  

He was kind of an interesting sign. He’s a smaller lineman and Dallas seems to like big powerful lineman.

by jack dein on Jan 19, 2010 12:35 AM CST up reply actions  

The one sack "stat" is misleading

He gets walked into the back field, a outside player rushes, the QB can’t move up into the pocket and tries to scamble, gets sacked by the OT’s man. His man, his sack, but if the OG does his job there is no sack.

by Trey, on Jan 19, 2010 3:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Replacing 5 offensive linemen (all currently 31 years of age or older) is going to be an extraordinarily difficult task over the next 2-3 years, and there are no quick fixes.

by JimmyK on Jan 19, 2010 3:03 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

I agree on Bye Dawk on this one

with all the picks we had last yr and we only took Brewster who was a reach IMO, there`s no excuse for having Proctor or MacQ on the squad as they contribute nothing to the O line.
  As for next yr the Cowboy`s O line will look like this
Flo is under contract and does get the job done so as long as the team has Doug Free to fall back on LT is ok.
Kosier at times resembled a rich man`s Cory Proctor and no that`s not a good thing, put lipstick on a pig and it`s still a pig. But Kosier should be back in case he`s needed but not be a starter IMO.
Gurode is ok at C but we need a better backup.
Davis is ok at RG
Colombo should return to form by next season.

my mock
Rd 1 (28) Maurkice Pouncey C Florida
Rd 2 (56) Nate Allen FS South Florida
Rd 3 (92) Jared Veldheer OT Hillside
Rd 4 (128) Mike Neal DE/NT Purdue
Rd 6 (205)Stephen Williams WR Toledo
Rd 7 (243) Hunter Lawrence K Texas

the depth chart would look like this
LT Flo / Free / Veldheer
LG Pouncey / Brewster/ Kosier
C Gurode / Pouncey
RG Davis/ Brewster
RT Colombo/ Free/ Brewster

by ziggy19 on Jan 19, 2010 3:17 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Dallas Cowboys blog for the SB Nation network. We talk Cowboys 24/7/365. Join the discussion but follow the community guidelines.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

222724_1014143404454_1551120017_30067740_5911_n_small
Jason Garrett: From Process to Promise
Rush_hour_small
Is Doug Free Overpaid?
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Hindsight Games Part 1: J.J. Watt
Rush_hour_small
Rohpuri's Spin on MTD's Latest Mock Draft: Cowboys Edition
97946_giants_cowboys__football_large_small
The Anthony Spencer Scenario

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could Terence Newman have been playing injured?
Cowboysmetal_small
NFL Player Salary Problem Solved.
Small
Offseason Priorities
Small
Starters, dominant players, and BPA
Dez_bryant_small
What we need is for Jerrah to act like a GM and be proactive and fix the team with $17M under the cap resources
Small
It's Rabble's Fault
Small
Do what Philly did in 2011, only better

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin

Lead Writer

Captain_small One.Cool.Customer

Profile_small Brandon Worley

Ollogo3_copy_small KD Drummond

Contributing Writers

Hotdoglu_small Aaron Novinger

Emmittintro_small rabblerousr

Dr_fate_small Tom Ryle

Moderators

Ns_08bstockb-thumb-200x185_small scottmaui