Last Offseason, the Cowboys Overhauled the Defense...Is it the Offense's Turn Now?
Going from 2008 to 2009, the Cowboys overhauled their defensive starting lineup. Free agents Keith Brooking, Gerald Sensabaugh, and Igor Olshansky took over at their respective positions. Former first-rounders Anthony Spencer, Mike Jenkins, and Bobby Carpenter injected their youth into the lineup and were three of the team's most improved players.
The plan worked. Over the course of the regular season, the unit gave up just 15.6 points per game - good enough for second in the league. Throw out the two meltdowns against the Giants, and the Cowboys lost their three other games with the defense allowing just 17 points to Denver, 17 to Green Bay, and 20 to San Diego. It's hard to blame those three losses on the defense.
What happened to the offense in those three games? Well, Miles Austin had yet to "emerge" in Denver, so Tony Romo and Sam Hurd came up short when trying to tie the game late. In Green Bay, Romo was sacked five times and the fact that the running backs totaled a combined 11 carries had all of BTB in an uproar. At home against San Diego, Jason Garrett stuck with the run at the goalline and we all watched Marion Barber come up short.
The defense played well enough to keep these games within the offense's reach, but the offense just couldn't get over that hump to get those needed points. And in Minnesota, the offense's weaknesses were truly exposed. They moved the ball early, but came up empty in the points department. Next season, they will have to get over that hump.
Jerry Jones and Wade Phillips were extremely aggressive - both in free agency and the draft - on the defensive side of the ball last offseason. In the end of the year press conference, Jones stated that they will again be "aggressive" in finding talented players. Right after that, he began his little spiel on "stacking" and "unstacking" the running back position. Sometimes, it's tough to read between his words; nevertheless, he had offense on the mind.
This offseason, how much change can we expect to see in Dallas' starting offense? Do they need the same kind of overhaul the defense had last year?
If you dissect the offense in an aggressive manner, there certainly are adjustments that can be made to the starting lineup.
First, let's look at the running back position. Felix Jones has proven enough to start in place of Marion Barber. Sure, injuries have been a concern with Felix. Although, the same can be said of Barber. In so many words, Jerry Jones recently expressed his concern about Barber's injury history.
``We have had an injury issue there at the end of each of the last two seasons,'' Jones said. ``That may have something to do with the amount of time we can give the other backs. That could impact that decision.''
Calvin Watkins heard some of the same concerns about Barber.
There's a hot rumor the Cowboys are shopping Barber, but I was told that's not true. But the Cowboys owe Barber a $4 million roster bonus this spring, and he's scheduled to make a base salary of $3.8 million. Jones said money isn't a factor in determining whether Barber will be back in 2010.
"He had various nicks but not as bad at the end as the year before," Jones said. "I like where we are at the running back position. We still got him, and his injury is in the categories of nicks. But he was still able to get in there and help us at the end [of the year]. And we weren’t in that situation the year before, and that’s progress."
Quincyyyyy put up a FanPost for us to list players that the Cowboys have been seen talking to during the Senior Bowl. Yesterday, draftbreakdown.com blogged that they spotted the team speaking with Auburn RB Ben Tate.
Tate (5'11", 218) is a guy who is projected to be a mid-round pick. According to this profile, he seems more in the mold of Barber rather than Felix or Tashard Choice.
Strengths:
Very good size and bulk --- Decisive, powerful, downhill runner --- Has a little wiggle in the hole --- Good receiver out of the backfield --- Tough and durable --- Great program pedigree --- May still have some upside.
Weaknesses:
Does not have great vision or instincts --- Lacks explosion --- Isn't very shifty or elusive--- Struggles to get outside and turn the corner --- Not a big play threat --- Just an average blocker --- Ball protection issues.
Read into that what you will. This is, of course, all speculation...for now.

The rest of the Dallas backfield could remain the same. Obviously, there would not be any change at starting quarterback for the Cowboys. There could be a change at fullback if the team chooses to play John Phillips more there than Deon Anderson. Should such a change occur, then the Cowboys may need another tight end. And remember, Jerry Jones recently remarked that he would like to see Martellus Bennett get down to business.
"I think focus would be the word," Jones said of Bennett. "He will get a lot more tweets if he's a big-time ballplayer than he will off his creative ability."
Low and behold, the Cowboys were spotted talking to Garrett Graham, a TE from Wisconsin. From his profile, Graham (6-3, 234) looks to be a receiving TE and a potential red zone threat (tied for 5th in school history with 16 career receiving TDs).
Marty B had just 15 receptions on the year while "Cricket" had just one. Neither caught a TD pass.

Thanks to Miles Austin, the offense is set at one WR spot. Expect an open competition for the other one come training camp. If Roy Williams can't improve upon his performance from this season, there will be a new starter at the #2 spot. Patrick Crayton, Kevin Ogletree, and Sam Hurd are the incumbent backups that will compete.
The team recently worked out former Florida WR Chad Jackson and signed CFL WR Titus Ryan from the Calgary Stampeders. He is no lock to make the team, but brings a dynamic presence in the kick return game.
Here is Ryan's CFL profile.
It would be a surprise for the Cowboys to draft a WR with their first pick, but Jerry Jones has expressed wanting to get a more explosive return game. Nick Eatman thinks the Cowboys could use some more juice at PR/KR as well.
If a receiver is sitting there late in the first round, and he's got return skills to boot, why not. Same goes with a safety or cornerback. So you don't necessarily have to go out and draft a player specifically to return kicks. But it could be a great tiebreaker if you've got a War Room debate.

Most mock drafts have the Cowboys selecting an offensive lineman with their top pick. That makes sense considering both the age of the starters and how dominated they were by the Vikings.
In regards to offensive linemen, Idaho G Mike Iupati seems to be the star of the Senior Bowl practices. The DMN made it known that "the Cowboys contingent perked up" when Iupati weighed in. Scott Wright of Draft Countdown has the Cowboys taking Iupati in the first round.
A mountain of a man at 6-6 and 330 pounds, Iupati is a mauler in the run game but also pretty athletic and still has considerable upside. With the ability to play either guard or tackle at the next level Iupati would certainly be able to find a home and provide an upgrade somewhere along the Cowboy’s offensive line.
Safety continues to be a perennial problem in "Big D" so that is a possibility as well and don’t rule out a five-technique defensive end to groom in case they lose Marcus Spears as a free agent a year from now. As a darkhorse don’t completely rule out a wide receiver either.
He interviews Mike Iupati of Idaho here.
Mel Kiper projected the Cowboys will take Maryland OT Bruce Campbell. Here is Mocking Dan's profile on the 6'7", 310-lb. Campbell.
In Bucky Brooks' Mock draft 1.0, he has them selecting Iowa's OT Bryan Bulaga.
Flozell Adams' declining skills make it necessary for Jerry Jones to find a replacement at left tackle.
Matt Mosely thinks that the Cowboys already have their plan for the future set at LT: Doug Free.
The Cowboys will select Iowa offensive tackle Bryan Bulaga, according to Brooks. He thinks the Cowboys need to find someone to replace left tackle Flozell Adams. But I believe the Cowboys have already identified Doug Free as the player who will replace Adams, perhaps as early as next season.

When looking at the needs of the Cowboys, those on offense look to be priorities. Sure, they can use another defensive back (they were seen speaking with Virginia DB Chris Cook) or defensive lineman. But the defense is arguably the most improved unit on this team. If Jerry Jones is not aggressive with the offense in free agency, he and Tom Ciskowki will be in the draft. If the Cowboys stick with the 27th pick, it could very well be used on offense.
Jones left open the possibility of taking an offensive player in the opening round for only the second time since 1998. Last year's draft will affect the process. The 2009 class was heavy on defense. That included the only two players who spent the season on injured reserve: defensive end Brandon Williams and safety Stephen Hodge. If they return as expected, Jones said, the Cowboys would have a glut on defense.
"That could affect our thinking," Jones said.
In summation, we can suspect that there will be some new faces on the starting offense to open the 2010 season. If the Cowboys aggressively approach the offensive side of the ball this offseason, there is the potential that five new starters will line up on opening day.
Possible new names at RB, FB, WR, OT, and OG could match the number of starters changed over on defense from the '08 to '09 season. Five new starters sounds improbable, but it's not impossible.
0 recs |
214 comments
|
Comments
First
Round tackle, count me in!
"When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time." -Max McGee
If the Cowboys like Iupati enough
they might even trade up in the first rd to get him because I think Jerry regrets not going up and getting Unger last year.
This kid sounds like he could be as versatile like Unger was last year, being able to play both guard or tackle.
In Romo we Trust
Based on almost nothing
I get the same sense, that trading up this year is a possibility. With the OL needs for this team it makes sense to me to be aggressive about going and getting someone. In some respects, there will be 2 yrs worth of rookies at training camp. Less bodies in this years draft should be fine.
by StillHateTheGiants on Jan 27, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions
Haha...
I like that statment “base on almost nothing.”.
I love blunt honesty.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
I think he does too...
but I think he tried to trade up and just couldn’t get there with the ammo he had.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions
if he continues to get this positive press he'll be gone in the early 20s
by AustonianAggie on Jan 27, 2010 11:21 AM CST up reply actions
All I have to say is good luck with that dream of drafting a first round tackle...and if Jerry moves up it def wont be a tackle..
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
it's more of a reality than trading up for a WR
You’re delusional if you think Jerry will take a WR in the first rd, not happening
In Romo we Trust
no need to trade up...Golden Tate should be for the taking right around 27...
tell you what, Jerry will be more willing to trade up for a offensive weapon than a boring lineman that will be sitting the pine all season….
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
not true at all
Whats funny is you think you know what Jerry will do but you obviously have no clue that he’s going to listen to Ciskowski and take the best player available on our board.
If it’s an OL then thats what it will be, sexy or not. Jerry has learned his lesson regarding the draft, he listens to his scouts now.
In Romo we Trust
Terry, when was the last time Jerry drafted a first round lineman?????....
thats all you need to know..
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
If you're really that simple minded Boyz
there’s really no help in making you understand drafting an OL is very possible and very likely if a good is available at 27.
In Romo we Trust
Terry you will never learn....Jerry is so predictable...
There is a better chance of Jerry trading down the first round pick than drafting a first round lineman. The value there maybe too good to pass up. Havent you paid attention to anything Jerry does on draft day, especially picking where we are. He is going to trade down. He is the king of trading down. I dont think anyone will be shocked if he does. He does it every year. If Jerry wants a lineman that bad he will draft one with the extra second round pick.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Wait a minute, when is the last time he took a WR in the 1st. WRs have a higher probability of being a bust.
He just blew his load on RW 2 years ago and has a promising Ogletree.
KICK ASS every day!!!
if he moves up the draft boards than someone will move down
only 26 people can be drafted ahead of us and not everyone needs a OLmen. I think its safe to say at 27 we will get a good O-lineman period.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
They could definitely use a G/T swing guy who can play.
He looks awesome, so far. Very powerful…stands his ground.
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 27, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
Im starting to like this Lupita(sp) more and more
They did say he struggled at T at the senior bowl practice Tuesday but he played G all though college and probably needs alot of work with technique. 1 practice isn’t exactley a body of work.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 27, 2010 1:43 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Big fish in a little pond
Iupita didn’t impress at OT, and OGs don’t get picked in the top 25. Besides, he’s not the only big OG in the draft. John Jerry goes 335, Brandon Carter run 350. Vlad Ducasse at 330 could be drafted as a OG. Finally all 320 pounds of Mike Pouncy could pust Proctor off the the roster as a OG/C backup.
I wouldn’t mind Iupita at the bottom of the first, but I have trouble with a trade up when the 2nd and 3rd picks could produce 2 future starters.
+1
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
+1 you dont draft projected guards in the first round...or guards period in the first round
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
thats not true
Alan Faneca and Steve Hutchinson were first round picks and have been studs and keys to their teams respective OLs
In Romo we Trust
Not Jerry Terry..NEVER going to happen...not a guard....lol...
Spending first round on a guard is just stupid..
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
they dont look too good these days do they...
Jerry is smart…he isn’t going to spend first round money on a rookie guard when he knows he can get good ones later or FA which has worked out pretty good….Kosier was a real good FA pickup and so was Davis. How can anyone argue they havent worked out…
Brewster if he pans out maybe the future LG of this team….everyone is so into drafting lineman, but what about the one we spent a 3rd rounder on last season?
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
I disagree
Faneca and Hutchinson have really solidified the Jets and Vikings OLs and made them two of the best OLs in the league.
BTW, we spent too much money on Davis, Jerry is on record as saying he would rather draft OL than over spend in FA on them.
In Romo we Trust
well you can blame Hutchinson for driving up the price of guards then...
Is he overpaid, maybe but he is one of the best guards in the league. Jerry just paid market value at the time..Not his mistake
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
it was his mistake for not being able to draft quality OL
Relying on FA is definitely not the way to go.
In Romo we Trust
No.
Don’t draft OL in the first round because Dallas has no luck.
That’s Boyz real reason.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 28, 2010 2:56 PM CST up reply actions
Jerry doesnt have much luck period drafting lineman....history speaks for itself
Flozell, Larry Allen what 11, 12 years ago, Gurode the most reacent….all others bust. Looks like we lucked out on Free though.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Drafting or not drafting based on "luck".
Is not a really good way to run an organization.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 30, 2010 4:18 PM CST up reply actions
Upgrading the line is certainly going to be a priority but
everyone is assuming that it’s an OT, and LT at the that. As bad as Flo can be at times, LG has been a bigger problem area IMO, especially in those games where they were physically dominated. Add to that is the fact that they seem to have tried replacing Kosier every training camp for the past three years. In order it seems that:
- They have their future LT ready to go when the Hotel goes out of business
- Kosier (LG)is job one
- Back up RT and Center are next in priority.
That’s just my uninformed view, of course…
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
Where does Free fit in all of this?
I think it’s pretty clear that he has a spot at some position.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
I think he'll replace Flo as soon as Flo gives up the ghost
And he could replace Colombo if his play declined and Flo was still productive. But I think he’s penciled in as the heir apparent. Apparently they like his work at LT in practice and a LT is much harder to find than a RT. That’s the reasoning anyhow.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
I’ve also heard someone (could have been Nate Newton?) say after Free’s first game or two, that he is more natural at LT because he sidesteps to the left easier than to the right. Seems like he did a decent job at RT after he got a bit of time there, but yeah LT is harder to replace so if they think he can play both, I suspect they’d want to put him on the left side. Also Brewster is more of a RT prospect.
how about
moving the hotel to RT this year and sliding Free in at LT?
And Columbo would go?
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:46 PM CST up reply actions
At somepoint..
he’s going to be a starter though.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 28, 2010 9:35 AM CST up reply actions
agreed..probably 2011, but he is going to be a backup again in 2010
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Dunkman, I've been singing that tune in practically all of these threads.
We all want an upgrade somewhere along the offensive line for next season. The thought of many is that LT is the most difficult position to fill and optimally you can find a franchise level player at that position in this draft. But center is an equally difficult position to fill. We all agree that that Boys are closer to having a franchise level player at C than they are at LT. But, my point here is that unless you know you are getting a franchise level player at LT, it makes little sense to carve that position out as priority #1, as they have serviceable depth there already. I contend they have 4 tackle candidates and three can at least offer decent protection as a LT. Along with Flo and Free, Kosier has the athleticism to manage the position. Free can also backup at RT.
As for guards, you have RG pretty well set. For depth, what position can 2nd year guy Rob Brewster play? Kosier can also backup both guard positions, but is probably a better LG than RG. So I agree LG is a need. But, personally, I’d prefer to try to take LG/C out with one fell swoop and get a premier C in the draft and either move Gurode to LG or, hopefully, get a guy like Pouncey who can be very effective at both positions.
If we’re looking at injury insurance, C is much more exposed than T or G. Priority 1, IMO, is an upgrade. The starting tackle position could just as easily be upgraded in the 2011 draft. Draft a T for depth, certainly. But don’t go gangbusters unless you know you have a premium prospect in your lap.
At pick 27....
Often the top rated OTs are off the board, but the interior linemen are yet to be drafted. It may well be possible to get the top overall G or C at 27, while maybe only the 5th best OT.
To me, it makes sense to strongly consider taking the top guard or center, especially when we have a viable long term candidate at the tough-to-fill LT spot (Free).
Hopefully it turns out that way.
Would be great to get the #1 or #2 interior guy while other teams are focused on pure OTs.
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 27, 2010 1:11 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldnt draft a guard that high, plus Brewster maybe that LG anyway we need.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Yup.
The Jets did this a few years ago with Nick Mangold, They took him 29th overall the same year they used the number 4 pick on D’Brickashaw Ferguson. Mangold was the All-Pro Center this year…
If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 27, 2010 1:22 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
I would rather see them get the #1 Guard or Center prospect, than the 5th or 6th rated OT.
I also agree Free could start at RT next season, and take over for Flo eventually. He’s more of a LT anyway.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 27, 2010 2:40 PM CST up reply actions
I think one of the main benefits of Iupati
has to be that he could come in and address our LG need right away, but potentially then move to RT if Brewster develops at that LG position down the road. The more and more I think about it, I am really liking Iupati as a pick for us.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Jan 27, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
more and more the NFL thinks about it
the less likely he is to fall to us at the end of the 1st round. I really think we’re gonna need to move up about 8-12 spots in order to draft him
That is certainly a possibility. However I am not so sure I would support trading up to get him since I really think we need all of our early picks in the draft. If Iupati does in fact go that high, I would rather see Dallas evaluate what is left at the OL and perhaps sit tight to get Charles Brown with that first round pick.
If I had a nickel for every Super Bowl the Eagles have won, I would have zero nickels.
by Cowboyfan729 on Jan 27, 2010 4:45 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I know D wins championships, so Jerry invests a lot in it, but I hope he's
finally going to be willing to use some high picks on the O. It’s their turn. The weaknesses on the O line have killed this team for the last three years.
Don't sell Indy's D short or even N.O. Turn over machine.
Peyton might be best ever but with Colts speed they remind me of the 90s Cowboys. Not as good in coverage but they swarm the ball.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 27, 2010 1:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Saints defense stinks
and Colts D isn’t much better. They’ll both get shredded badly which should make for the highest scoring SB ever.
It will be fun to watch, kinda like an Arena football game, but will make the football purists sick.
In Romo we Trust
I think that too...
but now watch it be like a 17-10 game.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:03 PM CST up reply actions
only if each side is committing a lot of TOs
If the Saints don’t get to Manning, it’s all over, I see them putting up a 40 burger easily if Manning has all day to throw.
In Romo we Trust
If your a top 10 QB.
You’ll put up 40 with all day to throw.
But I see the score being more of a 31-21 type of affair.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:10 PM CST up reply actions
they tend not to call holding in the Superbowl
for the entertainment factor. Manning should get the time he needs.
by I_miss_Switzer on Jan 27, 2010 2:24 PM CST up reply actions
And if the teams had equal offenses and one had a great D, I'd bet
on the one with the great D. Defense wins championships, and for you, Terry, I’ll add: unless both Ds are sub par.
lol
Saints defense stinks and Colts D isn’t much better.
One ranks 27th or so in defense and the other 7th…….yea I can see how they are similar ……geez( rolling eyes)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
try getting a clue dubious
Saints ranked 25th and Colts ranked 18th in total defense this season.
In Romo we Trust
who cares Terry they both are underrated...Again....
Saints D was harassing Favre all game…..and BTW…they had 4 TO, 5 for the game…yeah they aren’t that good…we couldnt do to Favre what the Saints did…..
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
creating TOs isn't a sign of a good defense
Defenses that give up a lot yardage like the Saints and have to rely on TOs are very overrated defenses.
Defenses just can’t rely on TOs to be successful.
And the reason the Saints defense appeared to have played better than us was because they were playing at home and had the crowd noise help them, it’s the reason the Vikes defense was so good against us.
In Romo we Trust
thats just a ridiculous statement Terry....OMG....please stop
The reason the Saints won that game was because of their defense….The saints lost in every statistical cagegory. Getting TO’s is part of being a good defense….they won games this year because of their defense this season.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
Saints didn't win that game because of their defense
Vikings gave them that game, their defense was getting their asses kicked all game long, they sucked really bad.
TOs were gifts by the Vikings, Saints had nothing to do with that.
In Romo we Trust
ok..Terry keep thinking that..lol
your in the minority there brother…punchng the ball out of Petersons hands twice during the game is just nothing right…thats not good defense…sure…lol
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
It's true whether you want to believe or not
Peterson fumbles against other defenses as well and half of those fumbles in that game were not a result of Saints punching the ball out, it was simply careless ball handling by the Vikings.
I guarantee the Colts won’t be so generous.
In Romo we Trust
Big difference when he just loses the ball or someone punches the ball out...
thats good defense….
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
good defense isn't giving up 500 yards
punching the ball out is called lucky defense and their luck will run out against the Colts.
In Romo we Trust
Terry
try getting a clue dubious Saints ranked 25th and Colts ranked 18th in total defense this season
The day you talk logical is when I will have a clue. The Colts are 8th in scoring defense……I don’t care about yards per game cause that includes garbage yards as well. Only thing that matters is how many points teams score on you. They were 8th and that is a big stat. Seems to be a pretty good defense to me. Also they are very fast and get after the QB, so they will be a big problem for NO.
I know you will come back with yards but again I will roll my eyes and laugh :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Saints defense was lucky this year
in getting the majority of those TOs against bad offenses. Against really good offenses like the Colts they will be exposed big time.
You can roll your eues and laugh all you want, but when Manning and the Colts slice and dice them like the crappy defense they really are, we’ll see who will be laughing then.
In Romo we Trust
Terry I haven't said the Saints defense is great
I have been defending the Colts against your logic. Can we stick to the point of what you just responded to? You are saying both defenses in this Superbowl are mediocre and I am saying the Colts are alot better than you ’re giving them credit. Ateam that ranks 8th in scoring on defense is pretty good. Yards can make it seem like a defense is terrible but that can vary depending on the game and how much garbage yards a team got at the end when they went to a prevent defense, etc.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Colts defense isn't good enough to stop good offenses like the Saints
but that won’t matter because the Colts will score so many points against the Saints horrid defense, the Colts can give up 24-28 points in this game and still win easily.
In Romo we Trust
Hey dubious I guess when Romo lost two fumbles on his own running with the ball was Romos fault
or was is good defense…..ah…..well, what is it Terry. Try to back out of that one pal…
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
hmm...
when were talking about Peterson running with the ball and fumbling it’s, thats Peterson’s fault he is fumble prone. If were talking the same scenerio like Romo in the Minn game running with the ball and fumbling it’s good defense by Minn…Really….LMAO! Hey Terry just like Peterson, Romo is fumble prone, has been since day one here. He did a better job this season, but the player is fumble prone like it or not…
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
all qbs fumble when they get hit like Romo got hit against the Vikings
Can’t compare RBs and QBs, like comparing apples and oranges.
In Romo we Trust
Saints led the league in turnovers. They punch for the ball on every tackle.
Indys D is fast and gets quick pressure.
KICK ASS every day!!!
Okay, Terry, whatever. D is still key most years, and it's very hard to win
consistently without a strong one. That is clearly the philosophy Jerry has followed for years, sometimes, IMO, to the detriment of the offense. I hope balance is restored this year, and the O line is overhauled.
+1 Dallas's D, Pitts D, Patriots D, S.F.s. All dynastys, all great Ds.
Wonder if their is some correlation there.
KICK ASS every day!!!
Terry missed what happened in 2007
a offense that scored almost 50 points a game got stuffed by a great pash rush and a Giants D that won that game.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
I didn't miss it and I agree a great defense stops a great offense
My point was that neither team in the SB this year has even a good defense. They both are offensive teams.
In Romo we Trust
And I will argue the Colts D is not avg
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
8th in points allowed is pretty darn good......I will take 8th in scoring allowed over 18th in total defense( based on yards allowed)
remember Dallas teams in the early 90’s? The tampa team when they had that good defense? Well the Colts play similar to those defenses, as its a bend but don’t break. They make teams go the distance to score. They don’t beat themselves as most offenses become impatient.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
no, the Cowboys defenses in the 90s didn't give up all those yards
They could actually stop teams without having to get a TO
In Romo we Trust
they were a bend but don't break defense
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
What is the weakness on the Oline?
Flo, Andre and Bigg have made ProBowls. Free proved he can start. The line always plays better with a healthy Kos. So is the weakness that several players have had injuries – that happens to every team.
Kosier is the weakness
when he has to play against a more physical front four. Colombo is a little slow in pass blocking against faster ends. They are relative weaknesses, but they set the team back in a few games this past season.
FREE THE OGLETREE!!!
The age is also a factor
I think age and health contribute to why we have collapses at the end of the season. I hope we see 2 or 3 new faces on the line next year.
+1
Flo was using every veteran trick in the book to stay alive. When old players lose it, they lose it fast. They have a tendency to get hurt and injuries linger longer. I would keep him on the team but try to go younger at both tackles. If a dominant G comes along in the draft and a weaker tackle, then go with the G. If we upgrade 2 positions then we are better,
I would rather go young and struggle early and come on late than dominate early and struggle late.
KICK ASS every day!!!
Fair enough
Seems the line take a big step back when Kosier is out. MacQ and Proctor can’t push him to the bench, maybe an early draft pick could. Bwester was already drafted to replace Columbo.
ok
Kosier is the weakness
last year the O-Line was not good cause they were missing a big piece in Kosier. Now this year they stink cause he is the weakness. We dallas fans can’t make up our minds can we :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
I was thinking the same thing. Another year of age? I don't know, but
it wasn’t pretty this year, and it seemed to be an issue of consistency more than any one player. Sometimes Flo held up, sometimes he didn’t. Sometimes Bigg was a beast, and sometimes he wasn’t. All I know is what I said below; Romo took a pounding all year, win or lose.
we all saw the same play off game
Our OLine got whipped. They got whipped vs Green Bay and a couple of other times.
What was particularly tragic was that they got whipped like this in 2007 by the Giants in the playoffs. It’s time for some new players along the line.
by AustonianAggie on Jan 27, 2010 4:34 PM CST up reply actions
correct but there will be bad games in every season
bad thing for us is this very bad game happened in the Playoffs. Still when Flo left the game, it seemed from my eyes the whole game changed. The offensive line was fine before that and then it imploded. Maybe his loss had more of an affect than we all think.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Even when the line was intact during the late-season win streak, Romo
was getting pounded. He suffered the most sacks this year of his entire career. The line is getting older and slower, and they have to address it and at least upgrade their depth and bring on players for the future. Other than Free, the backups are just bad. The fact that some players made Pro Bowls is completely irrelevant.
What is the weakness on the Oline?
OMG; did you go on vacation while the Cowboys played the Vikings? Flo is over the hill; he is hobbled. The only proven backup is Free. Kozier showed some vulnerability as did Bigg. We need a LT, times two. We need a center. I expect three new olinemen to make the team next year.
How about trying to obtain Anthony Gonzalez
from the Colts? Could he be gotten for a 3rd rounder? Or is that just completely unnecessary…
Is he available? they drafted him with a 1st rounder not long ago
still, I’d rather draft a player. If Indy is giving up on a 1st round WR, let them cut him.
by AustonianAggie on Jan 27, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
That actually...
isn’t a bad theory.
I don’t think that the Colts will want to just send a former 1st rounder away right now, but I often wonder what place Gonzalez will have on the team next year.
I don’t think that Garcon and Collie are just going to let him take over the #2 easily.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions
I'm sure they'll keep him.
He just had a freak injury early this year. They are going to have a ridiculous 4 wr set next year.
I don't think they'd cut Gonzales
but now they have four starting quality receivers. I guess that’s a good problem for the Colts to have. Of course it seems like any receiver looks like a quality player with Manning throwing him the ball.
Gonzalez was a first rounder, but has “somewhat” underachieved so far and missed virtually all of 2009 with an injury.
I still don’t think Dallas is set at WR, especially with #11. If they could replace #11 with a Gonzales or a draftee, I’d be all for it. I am not so sure Ogletree (bless his heart) and Hurd are ready for any sort of significant playing time. I could be wrong, naturally…
that kind of makes sense
I bet Indy could use a power back…but then, we can too
by AustonianAggie on Jan 27, 2010 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that Indy...
wants to take MBIII"s contract.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 1:38 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that Indy...
cares about running the ball
Then Write a Check
And add it to the deal. In other words, pay someone to take MBIII’s contract.
everyone keeps brushing me off
like this wouldn’t and shouldn’t happen but if we draft CJ Spiller he could help us out in 3 of our “needs” listed above – RB/WR/Returner… and i know that if you don’t like the idea now, if we did draft him you would fall in love with him the second he gets his first touch because he’s a touchdown waiting to happen
Rb is a strength of this team and our Olines is aging fast.
You can get a sperm cocktail of B. Sanders, Emmitt, J. Brown, and Sayers, produce a super back and it won’t make a hill of Beans if the blocking isn’t there.
This crew has shown the ability to find good backs in the later rounds if your worrying about MBIII health. Let’s get an Oline good enough for Dunkman to run through. The line is old, not very athletic, and not getting any better any time soon without youth.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Jan 27, 2010 1:18 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I don't know...
that would be a pretty badass runningback
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions
our oline
isn’t THAT bad… everyone is jumping on this viking game and seems to be forgetting that we had the 6th best passing offense and the 7th best rushing offense. also, Flo got injured that game and columbo was playing in only his 2nd game after being out of the lineup for a number of weeks. yes we did give up 34 sacks on the season but that puts us in the middle of the pack for that category so it’s not like we have a sieve for an oline… also, what have we done in recent history that makes you think we’re going to draft linemen this year that are going to make our oline this unreal blocking force? we do have free and possibly brewster that could help us out at tackle and we should start looking to get younger and if we draft spiller in the 1st we still have a number of other picks that can be used on linemen but i just think when you have a chance to add a back that could help us in more than one area and is truly a gamebreak, you do it… this is also contingent on us trading away either barber and/or choice because otherwise drafting spiller isn’t practical, obviously
You don't think
that Felix is game breaking?
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
oh no, i love felix but
could you imagine us with felix at RB (getting 15 carries, 20 touches), austin at WR and spiller returning kicks/punts, playing a little WR and spelling felix with 10 carries a game… we would be giving our opponents nightmares!
in order to get him
we’d proally be giving up our 2nd and possibly a later pick. then the best OL prospect we could get would be in the 3rd round. that seems too late considering OL is easily more pressing this offseason than a backup RB/PR
not necessarily...
if our scouting department continues it’s recent trend of finding pretty good players with mostly any of our picks no matter what round and they focus this years draft on oline then they should be able to find some good olinemen in later rounds and as UDFA since A LOT of very good linemen have actually gone undrafted
they've found some quality players in later rounds for sure
but not on the OL
they also haven't found
quality olinemen with high picks either which is why i don’t want to risk wasting one on a lineman when you can get a difference maker with unmatched speed that can fill a need (return man), create big time mismatches in the passing game, and be a co-starter at RB
so barber/choice become our numbers 3 and 4?
you’re talking about investing at least 2 quality draft picks to fill a position that doesn’t need to be addressed
no i said that we'd have to
trade one of them… and it has been stated that barber is on the trading block (just read the above article if you don’t believe me)
probably
but they aren’t drafting spiller Zero zero zero chance.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
if we keep all 3 of our current backs
you’re absolutely right but IF we trade barber and/or choice then it becomes a very real possibility
I think teams should turn over the RBs
every 3 or 4 years unless they hit on a special RB.
If thats true
then I heard that the Cowboys were looking into signing me to spell Felix.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 28, 2010 4:22 AM CST up reply actions
i'll give you that
which is why it will definitely be a long shot but one that could conceivably happen if the pieces fall right
But who's the Mom?
Then it might be worth it.
Say, one of the Williams sisters?
Tonya Harding, a little toughness?
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Jan 27, 2010 11:22 PM CST up reply actions
A sperm cocktail?
Yeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
Please..please...please....
stop.
I like CJ Spiller, I love his vesatility, and all that mumbo jumbo, but Dallas does NOT need him.
You know who else was a TD waiting to happen? Reggie Bush.
You’re putting this guy up on a plateau that he will not be able to reach.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
i was never a big fan of
reggie bush, even in college. i always thought he was over hyped. he never started (always played behind lendale white, which i thought was telling in itself) and had great players around him while spiller is on a team basically by himself where everyone knows he’s the guy and they still can’t stop him… and i know you don’t like hearing it Iron Fist but do we not “need” a great return man? could we not use a guy that is truly lightning in a bottle, can be played at multiple positions (wr, rb, pr, kr), never fumbles, has great hands, and on top of all that has great character? i know we need an olineman or two but 1) could we not draft them in rounds 2-7; 2) the odds are low that they will come in and start from day 1 (only spot that i see as being open would be LG); and 3) our success rate with olinemen is very low so i don’t want to risk using a 1st round pick on one
Dallas doesn't need that.
They have RB’s, they don’t have to use a first rounder for a return guy, and if they need a WR, take a WR.
You’re a nice guy, but I’m going to guess that you have an orange clemson tattoo somewhere on your body.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:40 PM CST up reply actions
nope
i actually am not loyal to any college team, i just become fans of great players and i think spiller is the best back i’ve seen come along in a while
Or he's Leon Washington
Which is awesome but not worth trading up for.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 2:47 PM CST up reply actions
leon isn't even close
to the same type of player… i would say spiller is more similar to a chris johnson with return ability, better hands, and more wiggle… by the time the draft rolls around spiller will probably be gone long before we pick so this will all be moot anyway but if for some reason he’s on the board at a pick that we can reasonably trade up to, we should definitely consider it because he’s that good
chris johnson with return ability?
‘better hands and more wiggle’ as well?
you must be smoking some good stuff
that's funny but
have you ever watched cj? if you have, you’d know… also, if you remember when chris johnson was coming out of the draft, everyone was saying how the titans reached for him, he couldn’t run between the tackles, he wasn’t an every-down back, he played against inferior competition, his draft position was based solely on his 40 time… this that and the other but he’s a no-brainer right now… the two RBs i liked most coming into that draft were actually chris johnson (everyone thought i was nuts back then too) and felix when everyone else was saying let’s go get mcfadden or mendenhall
Spiller is good but he isn't this unstoppable force you're making him out to be.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:24 PM CST up reply actions
no one's unstoppable but
he is VERY good… you’ll see. i just hope he doesn’t end up on the eagles cause they said they’re probably going to get rid of westbrook and they’re in the market for a RB with possibly their first pick this draft… that would not be good!
I know he's very good...
but I don’t know for a fact that he’s any better than Felix Jones.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:36 PM CST up reply actions
yes but you've got to admit
that having a team with the playmaking abilities of austin, felix, and spiller would be pretty nice! and it probably is just a pipe dream but all i know is i’d rather have him on our team than having to play against him
Yeah
but not a need at all.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
also, i'm not saying
play him as a full time WR, i’m saying play him a little as a WR to get matchup problems
And it will be in the first 16 picks probably.
Trading up for Spiller would be crazy stupid.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
Let's get Suh and McCoy too
If Spiller is around at #20 then your idea makes some sense (to Al Davis), otherwise it’s just too expensive to move up and draft at a position where the team has 3 good players.
yeah i did say
that spiller will probably be gone long before we pick so in all likelihood it will be too expensive to move up and yes we have 3 good players at that position which is also why i said we’d have to trade one of them so it would definitely have to be a perfect storm for us to land spiller but stranger things have happened
DOUG FREE at LT???
No way!!! We need a FRANCHISE LEFT TACKLE!!!
this is the draft to find it! Free flourished at RT and there’s no reason for us to ruin that progress!
what the hell is a franchise LT anyway??
I’d be happy with one that rarely gives up sacks and is decent in the running game. That could be Free, never know.
In Romo we Trust
Exactly
A franchise LT is just like a franchise RT. They both have to protect the QB, allow the RB to get the corner and a franchise player does it year after year. The difference is that a LT faces the fastest DEs and protects the blindside. Free’s work at RT showes he is ready to prove that he can be a franchise LT.
im not sure if Free is a LT...havent seen enough. He has shown he can play RT without question
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
If the boys moved up for Lupati. Assuming hes drafted between 15-25.
What would they have to give up? A second rounder?
"On a journey to anywhere you can draw your own map."
depends how high they'd have to go
Around 15-20, probably their 2nd rd pick, 20-25, probably a 3rd.
In Romo we Trust
I wouldn't want them to trade any picks between rounds 1-4
unless they add some players to key positions via FA.
BTB League Consolation Ladder Champ...thought you knew.
by Aaron Novinger on Jan 27, 2010 2:36 PM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't either
I honestly don’t think they will have to move up. The teams in front of Dallas all have bigger needs than LG. And they should have enough choices available to fill them.
It goes against common sense, but I believe Jerry when he says he’s fine with the #27 and they won’t be moving up or down.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 27, 2010 2:49 PM CST up reply actions
Just in front of us
Don’t forget all those early second slots could leapfrog above the Boys
22 Pats need youth at WR, and a front 7 pass rush
23 Pack another need for front 7 D, just switched to 3-4 or youth at DB
24 Iggles PBA, but fat Andy likes early linemen
25 Ravens need a WR
26 Cards need an OT
so if Iupati makes it to 20, could chance he slides to 27, although nobody can tell what a trade up would do.
Yep...
I don’t think there will be a need to trade up.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:35 PM CST up reply actions
lol..fat andy liking linemen
what makes u think he will pass on lupati @ 24?
He knows the value of OL
He also knows OGs don’t get drafted in the first round. Philthy has bigger needs on D, maybe even QB.
Philly
has alot of O-Lineman and alot coming back from injury. I think they will take the best player on the board but I think Defense is their need this year early.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Yep
If some team can’t live without him, maybe they leap frog Dallas, but other than Fat Andy’s obsession with the OL, no other team directly above Dallas looks like interior line is enough of a problem to justify a 1st.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 27, 2010 5:18 PM CST up reply actions
Yes
I think they will take a Left Tackle that fits their zone blocking scheme.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 28, 2010 9:32 PM CST up reply actions
Improved greatly in the second half of the season.
RW is the opposite of WR. Coincidence? I think not.
by aussie_cowboy on Jan 28, 2010 10:38 PM CST up reply actions
Philips as FB
I’m not sure who brought it up first, but I first saw it in an article by Rafael. Aaron mentions the idea again in this one. I think moving Philips to FB is a really intriguing idea. I like Deon Anderson, and I’m not advocating his release. However, I was impressed with Philips in the second half of the season, especially as a rookie. I don’t know if he can run the ball, but how many touches would he get a season? One? But I think he would be a better passing threat out of the backfield, probably a better blocker, and give Garrett more motion options out of the backfield. Does that make him an H-Back? Change his number to be a FB?
I LOVE Phillips as our FB next year
someone (Darryl Johnson?) said that a good FB needs to be able to do two of three things, block, catch, and carry. Phillips has shown promise as both a lead blocker and receiver already and I think would definitely be an upgrade over Anderson
I don't think that's necessary though.
I think there will be someone good fall to Dallas.
Is there anyone 8-10 picks above Dallas right now that are just slam dunk must have picks?
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 3:40 PM CST up reply actions
I'd go Barber and our #1
to get a truly bonefide, can’t miss OLineman
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Jan 27, 2010 11:23 PM CST up reply actions
Barber contract is a wrench in the spokes IMO
Bennett would be more likely to get a trade done, if Dallas wants to move up.
yeah, no one will want to pay that
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
by Realist Larry on Jan 28, 2010 12:24 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think Jerry really wants to
move up, but Bennett and Dallas’ #1 sould get them up to a 10 or 12 pick IMO.
Will Jerry spend a #1 on an OLman?
I don’t know if it’s sexy enough for Jerry.
history says NO :0
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Well...
I guess if history started in 1999.
If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 27, 2010 5:34 PM CST up reply actions
History can mean a number of things and not just the number zero
as in what % does he draft OL in the first round since he took over the Cowboys? By that notion , history says he doesn’t draft OL in the first round. What like 1 or 2 years out of 20?
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
One thing that isn't sexy
Watching your franchise QB repeatedly scraping himself off the carpet
Drago says, "We must break you!"
by APerfectStar on Jan 27, 2010 5:58 PM CST up reply actions
yeah, I guess throwing a rookie or a unproven player at LT is going to keep Romo off his back more right....
Its a win now league people….If you want to win now, meaning next year you don’t throw a rookie or an unproven player in the hopes your franchise QB doesnt get killled. Next year is not the time to find out if we MAY have our future LT.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
LTs drafted in the 1st round start ALL the time and do well.
LT is one of those positions that they have a better understanding of what they are looking for. They arent WRs or QBs.
You are right there will be a learning curve and he will be shakey early but I would prefer a young guy getting better every month heading to the playoffs than an older guy starting great but breaking down and growing old before our eyes every month til the playoffs.
KICK ASS every day!!!
Yep.
I don’t know why there is this myth that young offensive lineman can’t step in and start right away.
It happens ALL the time.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 29, 2010 9:05 AM CST up reply actions
yea cause some can't do any worse than what is already on the field :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
I dont think Romo will appreciate the learning curve with a rookie when this team is trying to make a run
and im sure Wade will agree. I dont see any of these rookies where he are drafting being able to compete at LT next year. They all look like they at least a year away.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
I think Romo would rather put up with struggles early in the season than struggles late during a playoff push.
Flo’s play will probably fall off the edge of the clift in Dec/Jan. If not then he will probably be hurt again.
I will have to say your absolutely right about Wade going with the old guy. His track record proves that but Im thinking if we invest in a 1st rouinder at Tackle Wade will be on board.(probably the only way Wade is on board)
KICK ASS every day!!!
he wont...its a pipe dream by many....Jerry never drafts lineman that early
His mentality is he can get them in the later rounds or FA…his track record isn’t the best at drafting lineman either. Jerry can’t get past of spending first round money on a player, especially ones that dont see the playing field..like you said Jerry taking a lineman in the first is not sexy enough.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
yeah the 49th pick in the 2nd round....not the FIRST...big difference...
they wanted Unger to eventually replace Gurode and then move Gurode to LG….that was there plan.
"Austin made the play, Austin saved the day" Brad Sham
I'm at work right now...
and I’m listening to the Brett Favre love from my office.
It is sickening.
These people tout him like a god.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 4:26 PM CST reply actions
they’re totally cool with his INT to give the game away?
by AustonianAggie on Jan 27, 2010 4:39 PM CST up reply actions
These guys aren't Minnesota fans...
they are Brett Favre fans because he’s from south MS.
It’s just like… strange.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 4:45 PM CST up reply actions
I hope he retires
With his last pass a pick!
you know we keep saying
OG and OT, I for one do not think Center is out of the question. Someone recently posted how gurode gave up the most sacks in the post season.
Anyone, have any good ideas for possible replacements for gurode, either through the draft or through free agency?
by TONYINCC on Jan 27, 2010 6:07 PM CST via mobile reply actions
It's definitly not out of question.
They would have drafted Unger last year if they had the chance.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 27, 2010 6:19 PM CST up reply actions
Pouncey is the top of the class
He should go in the second, might take a nudge up to get him.
I Loved Bruce Campbell in Army of Darkness
Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.

by 






















