Seven Statistical Nuggets To Start the Off-Season
Random statistical thoughts and musings as we enter what promises to be a very, very long off-season.
1. If the Eagles' front office were to run the Dallas Cowboys ...
... I would get violently sick, Seanrude would be arrested and make the local Dallas newspapers under the headline "Deranged New Jersey Man Tries to ‘Fire’ Andy Reid", Dallas would never again win a Superbowl and Bye, Dawk :( would finally come out of the closet as a Dallas fan - in short, nothing good would come of this.
But, you've got to give it to the Eagles, they do have a crafty front office, and appear to be doing three things well:
- They have a knack for establishing high roster quality at (relatively) low cost. So do we, see also Tony Romo, Miles Austin, Jay Ratliff and perhaps one day Kevin Ogletree
- They do really well at letting go of veteran players shortly before their performance significantly declines – feasting off the free-agent mistakes other teams make in overvaluing the Eagles’ players. Recent cases in point: the Lito Sheppard trade (27 yrs, '09 5th rounder & '10 conditional pick), the Greg Lewis trade (28, '09 5th rounder) and letting the declining veterans Brian Dawkins (35) and Jevon Kearse (31) go instead of paying them outrages money. Outside of Anthony Henry (part of trade for Jon Kitna) most Dallas 'Veteran' players last year were released without getting any trade value for them (Owens, Williams, Ellis, Thomas, Davis, Pacman)
- Philadelphia is a dangerous place for any player over 30. Excluding their two kickers, McNabb and the likely-to-retire Westbrook, the Eagles have 5 players currently 30 years or old. Excluding Kitna, the Cowboys have 10.
Applying points 2 (use players in their late 20's or early 30's as trade bait) and 3 (move the over 30s into assisted living facilities) to the Dallas roster could look as follows:
Potential trade bait: Get some trade value for Barber, Crayton, Hamlin and/or James as long as they still have some gas in the tank, and Newman if the coaching staff see Scandrick as a viable replacement.
The over 30s: unfortunately, despite their age, most of these players are relatively safe, as we have hardly any suitable replacements for them. Here's looking at you, Mike Iupati.
| OFFENSE | DEFENSE | |||||||||
| Name | Pos | Roster | Exp | Age | Name | Pos | Roster | Exp | Age | |
| Kitna, Jon | QB | 53 | 13 | 37 | Newman, Terence | CB | 53 | 7 | 31 | |
| Romo, Tony | QB | 53 | 7 | 29 | Gordon, Cletis | CB | 53 | 4 | 27 | |
| McGee, Stephen | QB | 53 | R | 24 | Jenkins, Mike | CB | 53 | 2 | 24 | |
| Scandrick, Orlando | CB | 53 | 2 | 24 | ||||||
| Barber, Marion | RB | 53 | 5 | 26 | Ball, Alan | CB | 53 | 2 | 24 | |
| Choice, Tashard | RB | 53 | 2 | 25 | Floyd, Marquis | CB | RF | 2 | 29 | |
| Jones, Felix | RB | 53 | 2 | 22 | ||||||
| Donaldson, Herb | RB | RF | R | 24 | Olshansky, Igor | DE | 53 | 6 | 27 | |
| Spears, Marcus | DE | 53 | 5 | 26 | ||||||
| Anderson, Deon | FB | 53 | 3 | 26 | Hatcher, Jason | DE | 53 | 4 | 27 | |
| Bowen, Stephen | DE | 53 | 4 | 25 | ||||||
| Witten, Jason | TE | 53 | 7 | 27 | Dixon, Marcus | DE | RF | 1 | 25 | |
| Bennett, Martellus | TE | 53 | 2 | 22 | ||||||
| Phillips, John | TE | 53 | R | 22 | Siavii, Junior | DT | 53 | 4 | 31 | |
| Ratliff, Jay | DT | 53 | 5 | 28 | ||||||
| Crayton, Patrick | WR | 53 | 6 | 30 | ||||||
| Williams, Roy | WR | 53 | 6 | 28 | Brooking, Keith | LB | 53 | 12 | 34 | |
| Austin, Miles | WR | 53 | 4 | 25 | James, Bradie | LB | 53 | 7 | 29 | |
| Hurd, Sam | WR | 53 | 4 | 24 | Ware, DeMarcus | LB | 53 | 5 | 27 | |
| Ogletree, Kevin | WR | 53 | R | 22 | Carpenter, Bobby | LB | 53 | 4 | 26 | |
| Holley, Jesse | WR | RF | 1 | 26 | Spencer, Anthony | LB | 53 | 3 | 25 | |
| Ryan, Titus | WR | RF | 2 | 25 | Octavien, Steve | LB | 53 | 1 | 25 | |
| Johnson, Manuel | WR | RF | R | 23 | Johnson, Curtis | LB | 53 | 2 | 24 | |
| Williams, Jason | LB | 53 | R | 23 | ||||||
| Gurode, Andre | C | 53 | 8 | 31 | Butler, Victor | LB | 53 | R | 22 | |
| Preston, Duke | C | 53 | 5 | 27 | Hodge, Stephen | LB | IR | R | 22 | |
| Procter, Cory | C | 53 | 5 | 27 | Williams, Brandon | LB | IR | R | 21 | |
| Woods, Donovan | LB | RF | 2 | 24 | ||||||
| Davis, Leonard | G | 53 | 9 | 31 | ||||||
| Kosier, Kyle | G | 53 | 8 | 31 | Hamlin, Ken | S | 53 | 7 | 28 | |
| Holland, Montrae | G | 53 | 7 | 29 | Watkins, Patrick | S | 53 | 4 | 27 | |
| Bright, Travis | G | RF | R | 27 | Sensabaugh, Gerald | S | 53 | 6 | 26 | |
| Hamlin, Michael | S | 53 | R | 24 | ||||||
| Adams, Flozell | OT | 53 | 12 | 34 | ||||||
| Colombo, Marc | OT | 53 | 8 | 31 | Special Teams | |||||
| McQuistan, Pat | OT | 53 | 4 | 26 | McBriar, Mat | P | 53 | 6 | 30 | |
| Free, Doug | OT | 53 | 3 | 25 | Suisham, Shaun | K | 53 | 4 | 28 | |
| Brewster, Robert | OT | PUP | R | 23 | Ladouceur, L.P. | LS | 53 | 5 | 28 | |
| Buehler, David | K | 53 | R | 22 | ||||||
| No alternatives, safe despite age | Potential trade bait | |||||||||
Notes on Roster: 53: 53-man roster, IR: Injured reserve, PUP: Physically unable to perform, RF: Reserve Future
2. Quality wins
This season, Dallas had a 4-2 record against quality teams (teams with a winning record in the 2009 regular season). Only two teams had more wins against quality opponents than Dallas: Indianapolis (5-1) and New orleans (5-1). Guess which two teams are playing the Superbowl this year?
Below is a summary of quality wins for the NFC East. Notice how the Cowboys have garnered have of the quality wins of the whole divison? Notice also how the Eagles have have played the fewest quality opponents of all teams in the division? That may go some way to explaining how they ended up with an 11-5 record despite their brutal injury record.
NFC East Quality standings 2009
| Team | W | L |
| Cowboys | 4 | 2 |
| Giants | 3 | 6 |
| Eagles | 1 | 4 |
| Redskins | 0 | 7 |
3. Not all turnovers are created equal.
During the 2009 regular season, there were 872 turnovers in the NFL, or 1.7 per team per game. The Cowboys were fairly efficient in this stat department, creating only 21 turnovers in the regular season. Below is look at all 256 games this season, and how the number of turnovers correlates with the W/L record.
W/L correlation to turnovers, 2009
| 0 TO |
1 TO | 2 TO | 3 TO | 4 TO | |
| W/L | 78-22 | 91-60 | 60-73 | 23-57 | 4-44 |
| %-age | .780 | .603 | .451 | .288 | .083 |
Turnovers are clearly not the way to win games in the NFL. Duh. But here's an interesting nugget: unsurprisingly, the 12 playoff teams were able to compensate for turnovers significantly better than non-playoff teams, but the margin of difference is surprising, at least to me:
Winning percentage based on number of turnovers, 2009
| 0 TO |
1 TO | 2 TO | 3 TO | 4 TO | |
| Playoff teams |
.857 | .800 | .625 | .458 | .182 |
| Non-playoff teams | .706 | .473 | .353 | .314 | .054 |
4. Offense or Defense, which one gets you to The Tournament?
"Offense wins games, defense wins championships" is one of the more often heard phrases in football. Well, this season things certainly look different. The Colts and the Saints play the superbowl with the 18th and 25th ranked defenses by yards, and the 8th and 20th ranked defenses by points respectively. Defensive powerhouses they are not.
And of the teams making The Tournament, offense and defense are evely split. In an interesting statistical fluke this season, 9 out of the top 11 scoring offenses and 9 out of the top 11 scoring defenses made the playoffs. Also worth noting is that the Cardinals were the only playoff team that did not finish the regular season with either the offense or the defense in the top 10.
Playoff participants (*) and their ranking on offense and defense by points
| Offense | Defense | |||||
| Team |
Pts scored | Rank | Team | Pts allowed | Rank | |
| Saints* | 510 | 1 | Jets* | 236 | 1 | |
| Vikings* | 470 | 2 | Cowboys* | 250 | 2 | |
| Packers* | 461 | 3 | Ravens* | 261 | 3 | |
| Chargers* | 454 | 4 | 49ers | 281 | 4 | |
| Eagles* | 429 | 5 | Patriots* | 285 | 5 | |
| Patriots* | 427 | 6 | Bengals* | 291 | 6 | |
| Colts* | 416 | 7 | Packers* | 297 | 7 | |
| Giants | 402 | 8 | Colts* | 307 | 8 | |
| Ravens* | 391 | 9 | Panthers | 308 | 9 | |
| Texans | 388 | 10 | Vikings* | 312 | 10 | |
| Cardinals* | 375 | 11 | Chargers* | 320 | 11 | |
| Cowboys* | 361 | 14 | Cardinals* | 325 | 15 | |
| Jets* | 348 | 17 | Eagles* | 337 | 19 | |
| Bengals* | 305 | 22 | Saints* | 341 | 20 | |
5. Gratuitous cheerleader pics of the week.
The Tampa 2. Twice.
via i.cdn.turner.com
6. "Live Fast, die young": The motto of our defense in 2009
We've all given ourselves multiple virtual pats on the back for the performance of the Cowboys defense in 2009, after all, they were ranked 2nd in the league in points allowed only behind the Jets.
But what should give us pause is our 4th quarter defense:
Cowboys defensive points allowed by quarter, 2009 reg. season
| Q1 |
Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
| 27 | 80 | 34 | 109 | 250 |
First, the (statistical) good news:
- Through the first three quarters, Dallas has the best defense in the league (141 points), with the Jets a distant second (169).
- We are ranked #1 in the NFL by points allowed in the 1st and 3rd quarter and # 3 in the 2nd quarter.
And now for the (statistical) bad news:
- In the fourth quarter, our defense is ranked 24th in the league. And don't start annoying me with 'junk time' scores, other teams have them as well and don't slip as badly as the Boys.
- 44% of the total points scored on us come in the 4th quarter. In laymen's terms, that is ALMOST HALF of all points scored on us are scored in the 4th quarter. For comparison, the team allowing the fewest 4th quarter points (Saints, 48 points) allowed only 17% of their total points in the 4th quarter.
7. Quality stat of the month:
For the first time in its SBNation history, BTB has surpassed 300,000 vistors a month in January 2010, with 313 thousand vistors and counting. That's quite a step up from the 3,369 vistors in BTB's first month on SBNation in December 2005. Here's a link to Dave's first BTB post on SBNation. Oh, how time flies - well worth a read.
Among the regulars mentioned in the post still around today: Deke, Parl, CCBoy and, not surprising at all, Terry.
Special thanks to our front page staff for this achievement.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
46 comments
|
16 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And they have wonderful stats.
Which fits right in with OCC’s theme. How could they ever be left out?
Great Job
as usual OCC. Could have used more stats on the cheerleaders but not really necessary. It seems to be general consensus that new blood is needed at Oline. If the Cowboys were to move Flo inside to LG would Kosier have any trade value. Also with the play at TE of Phillips do you think they might consider Bennett available if the price was right ?
I come for the cheesecake and discover that I am referenced by name in the article
How cool is that?
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
This is actually a slightly changed quote from you that had me laughing so hard I knew I had to use it somewhere
If by some miracle, the Cowboys get a first round bye, and Wade trots out that “A Bye is the same as a playoff win” crap, I will go down to Valley Ranch and fire the SOB myself
I realize that I will be arrested and make the local newspaper under the headline "Deranged New Jersey Man Tries to ‘Fire’ Wade Phillips" but it willbe worth it
by Seanrude on Dec 29, 2009 11:57 AM EST
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 29, 2010 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
Any idea how the Cowboys compare in age to the league average? I often hear
people refer to the Cowboys as a young team, but 10 over 30 doesn’t scream youth to me.
average age of nfl teams:1 Redskins 28.02
2 Saints 27.99
3 Cardinals 27.74
3 Patriots 27.74
5 Lions 27.62
6 49ers 27.51
7 Steelers 27.50
8 Vikings 27.48
9 Seahawks 27.41
10 Falcons 27.39
11 Titans 27.29
12 Browns 27.18
13 Jets 27.16
13 Broncos 27.16
15 Bears 27.02
16 Cowboys 26.93
17 Bills 26.93
18 Chargers 26.93
19 Texans 26.89
20 Giants 26.88
21 Ravens 26.83
22 Raiders 26.82
23 Eagles 26.81
24 Rams 26.73
25 Jaguars 26.61
26 Bengals 26.60
27 Dolphins 26.47
28 Bucs 26.46
29 Panthers 26.39
30 Chiefs 26.36
31 Colts 26.34
32 Packers 26.16
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
every year Colts are among the 5 youngest teams it seems
by AustonianAggie on Jan 29, 2010 4:03 PM CST up reply actions
the hard one to understand is why the Lions are at the top portion?
Seems to me they would have the youngest team with all the rebuilding they have done since the Sanders days.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
Probably because their drafts under Millen were so bad.
FA is how they built their roster.
"Everybody wants something but nobody wants to pay the price" - Michael Irvin
Careful, numbers in this ranking may be closer than they appear
On a 53 man roster, 10 years of age differential is roughly equivalent 0.2 years at an aggregated level, i.e. the difference between say the Cowboys (16th with 26.93) and the Rams (24th with 26.73) is about 10 years age difference over the whole 53 man roster. That’s next to nothing.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 29, 2010 4:16 PM CST up reply actions
i.e. the difference between say the Cowboys (16th with 26.93) and the Rams (24th with 26.73) is about 10 years age difference over the whole 53 man roster. That’s next to nothing.
Thats why I posted this cause most teams in the Salary cap era are about the same in avg age. Dallas has more older guys but alot of younger guys than most teams which avg out usually.
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
good read OCC, rec'd
The most duh stat you showed was that teams that score the most and giving up the fewest points were mostly in the playoffs :)
I like the cheerleader one , although nothing to do with the rest, it gave it the juicy flavor to the story :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
After years of research, I too have found a killer stat
You wont believe this, but last season, the teams that scored more points than their opponents won 100% of their games! Incredible.
And I’m hot on the heels of another killer stat: I believe that teams that allow fewer points than their opponents also have a very high chance of winning their games, but I’ll need some more time on the company mainframe to verify that and it might take a couple of months.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 29, 2010 3:59 PM CST up reply actions
Don't tell Terry that cause well the Colts defense, in his opinion,
they’re mediocre. Yet the 8th scoring defense in the league lol the Saints had to score 510 though to make up for their poor defense :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
enhanced literally :)
"When people talk about Super Bowl dynasties they mention the 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 1990's Cowboys and the current New England Patriots, but nobody has dominated the Super Bowl like Anheuser-Busch. In recent years, Budweiser has been the MVP of Super Bowl advertising -- making another company the favorite to win the Ad Meter poll was never an option."
Simon Noble
She's probably somebodys' baby tonight..
If you’re not of age, Phoebe Cates I fell in love with in the space of 2 seconds during her appearance in “Fast times at Ridgemont high” coming out of the swimming pool…sweetness.
"The greatest test of courage on earth is to bear defeat without losing heart."
If I had a nickel for every time I, um, well, "enjoyed" that scene, I'd be a rich man
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
The first version of that Tampa 2 is high quality, the second one’s head looks photo shopped.
I like the Philly comparison, and agree they’ve done a good job of staying competitive without breaking the bank, but Joe Banner and the Philly braintrust clearly missed the window and took too long to provide McInjury the speedy targets he has now.
OCC, can you reverse #2 and tell us how teams did against opponents with losing records?
A tired defense in the 4th quarter? Didn’t we hear that last year (Pittsburgh and Baltimore games)? Is that a statement about our depth? our conditioning? our lack of a 365-pound NT to spell Ratliff? :-)
As for trade bait, the notion of Barber having much value is interesting. I don’t believe in trading players at any other time than when they are older and playing at a high level or younger and unable to get on the field because of who is in front of them. That means the real trade value rests with Tashard Choice.
Well done, OCC.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Opp's with losing record
Courtesy of the Giants, Panthers, 49ers and Broncos, our division has played 4 of 5 teams that ended up 8-8, so the little table below shows the record against losing teams, and the record against 8-8 teams in brackets.
DAL 6-0 (2-2)
PHI 5-1 (5-0)
NYG 5-0 (0-2)
WAS 3-2 (1-3)
One thing is interesting as I looked at the records: The Giants, who famously started 5-0, started against the following records in their first five games – 4-12, 11-5, 3-13, 4-12, 5-11. So, apart from the Dallas game which we handed them on a silver platter, no serious competition. The next four games: 13-3, 10-6, 11-5, 13-3, and voilá, the Giants are 5-4 and then sort of trundle to an 8-8 record.
Agree that the real trade value in the RBs is with Choice (and in TEs with Bennett), but that would run counter to the premise of trading players in their late 20s. Plus, particularly in the the case of Bennett, I trust the coaches to develop the talent they obviously see in him. Don’t forget, Bennett, despite entering his 3rd year as a Cowboy is still the youngest player on the team (with Felix and Phillips) and may just have needed some time to mature.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 30, 2010 12:50 AM CST up reply actions
There are tons of talented players taking my order at the drive-thru
The ones that stick have a passion for the game. The exceptions are at positions where the mental aspect of the game isn’t as great as others. Skill positions require that certain something and I am not sure Bennett has it.
We’ve traded players like Fasano and others in the past. If it helps the team, I’m fine with it.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
men you kill me with those cheerleaders
i think they’re among the best since you started to post that kind of “funny pictures”
and they root for…?
And talking about football Marc Colombo should be in the red charts
great post, will rec later
I’m sitting on a creeper at work under an f15 motor.. the cheerleaders were def a nice touch, as always haha
FEAR the STAR.
"You have been banned from Bleeding Green Nation" -JasonB
by .FRoST.USAF on Jan 29, 2010 9:40 PM CST via mobile reply actions
why on earth would the cowboys even consider to trade newman?
This is a passing league you need 3 corners at least.. you think alan ball can start? I dont.
What the French?! Toast!
I didn't say they should
what I tried to show is that the Eagles have a track record of trading players shortly before the window closes on any potential trade value. Using the same logic, I believe that TNew today would still command significant trade trade value. I’m not sure this will still be the case in a year or two.
by One.Cool.Customer on Jan 30, 2010 10:15 AM CST up reply actions
Except when they traded those players
They had already acquired better talent to replace them with, plus I don’t think the players they traded had costly contracts.
If some of the players Dallas cut last season had smaller contracts, I’m sure Dallas could have attempted to trade.
Guys on the team that would get more interest and max. trade offers: Bennett, Choice, Scandrick
Drago says, "We must break you!"
I actually advocate looking at trading Newman
His best games are behind him and you trade players when you can still get high value in return.
Guys like him, Crayton, Telly B and others should all be looked at.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
really nice article but...
Would not want to trade Tnew. 3 cover corners seem to be the minimum needed in today’s pass happy NFL.
Also, while I agree BJames is not the stud stuffer in the middle, who’s his replacement? The recent draftees for ILB haven’t hit the field yet.
"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
I don't think you can trade James
We definitely don’t have anyone who can replace him.
FEED THE BEAST!!!
Twitter Account
Trade
Wouldn’t mind trading Barber and Crayton.
I think we can find a replacement for Barber via the draft. We already have Crayton’s replacement on the roster.
FEED THE BEAST!!!
Twitter Account
OCC
You do great work brotha. I am always recommending your post on Twitter and to friends..
FEED THE BEAST!!!
Twitter Account
I'm still around from that first post
I had to come up with my current moniker because someone else in the SBnation already claimed Tom.
I can’t believe that was 5 years ago. Time flies when you are blogging about the ’Boys.
OCC, I think your fanposts ought to be considered for front page status. They always get a ton of rec’s.
Drago says, "We must break you!"
Hello "Tom"
5 years … that just impresses the heck out of me. Like many other newbies here, I’m barely out of my rookie season. Now I need to focus on avoiding that sophomore slump…
by One.Cool.Customer on Feb 1, 2010 4:10 AM CST up reply actions
+1
OCC, I think your fanposts ought to be considered for front page status. They always get a ton of rec’s.
Gratuitous cheerleader pics of the week
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…Creamsickles!
"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo
Just remember...
RBs don’t age well. Speed receivers don’t age well. Tackles don’t age well especially if they have had knee problems. Speed linebackers don’t age well either.
I don’t worry much about Leonard Davis or Andre Gurode. Andre didn’t even start for a couple years, so he still has some tread on him. Leonard has not had any health issues, so he’s probably good for a few more years as well. Free will probably replace either Colombo or Adams next year. Adams didn’t have a bad year last year, but he’s getting way to far on the bad side of 30. Colombo is a great guy to have on your line, when he’s healthy, but the Viking’s Edwards showed the Colombo’s ability to match up with speed rushers has pretty much left him. He might get healthier and do better, but his history of injuries isn’t the best. Brewster might provide some challenges to Kosiar for the left guard position.
Although Crayton is 30, he’s not a speed receiver. His asset is crisp routes and good hands, something that doesn’t break down overnight. Ogletree will provide a boost here next year, but the question is at which position and who will lose playing time. Don’t expect a WR drafted though, at least not in the early rounds. It takes too long to get WRs ready with playbook knowledge usually and we don’t have that kind of window.
I believe the biggest issue is what to do with Barber. He’s big and strong, so speed isn’t an issue, but his health has become a huge one. He’s such a bull, but he seems to take almost as much damage from his hits as he gives and his body is starting to show it. The other problem you have is that other GMs see this too, so trying to get any value out of him is not going to be easy.
Some say trading Tashard is the way to go, but even though he’s a solid back, a lot of GMs these days feel you can get a Tashard in just about any round. No need to overpay in a trade for him. Dallas probably wouldn’t even get a fourth round pick for him, the same round they picked him up in.
Sad to say, but Dallas really doesn’t have much to trade with. The value just isn’t there for other teams. Most of these players have more value with Dallas due to their knowledge of the playbook and teammates than they do elsewhere.
With free agency not looking so great this year, the draft might be our only way to trying to create competition within the team. Finding starters might be even harder, but as long as you can create competition, you can upgrade your team internally from just having that. Not the brightest option, but there appear to be a lack of them on the horizon.
I find myself wondering if Dallas would get more big plays
with a 4.3 type WR in the slot
by AustonianAggie on Feb 10, 2010 4:44 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















