Am I alone in my concerns about this Saturday night..?
Admittedly I am a glass half empty type of guy so it comes as no surprise that I’m still worried about this Saturday night. I fear that we’ll see an overconfident Cowboys team squaring off against a pissed off and hungry Eagles bunch.
Last Sunday I became more and more troubled by the fact that the Eagles were not blitzing, (as if they were holding something back). Even after it had become evident that their “rush 4/zone coverage schemes” were getting torched they still failed to bring the pressure (and at this point the score was still just 7-0). In the 2nd half they brought more pressure but nothing too exotic. I couldn’t help but wonder if the Eagles could really be so brazen? Could they really be holding back, not giving their all, and sacrifice in the process a first round bye, believing that three road wins in route to Miami would be just as easy? Perhaps the more logical explanation is that they miss the likes of Jim Johnson and Brian Dawkins.
Did perhaps the Cowboys save anything? They knew heading into last Sunday that a win meant they faced the same team two weeks in a row. Is it possible that both Phillips and Garrett kept a few things hidden in the playbook, knowing they could unleash them the following week? I do believe that Cowboys will have to unveil something the Eagles haven’t seen at some point on Saturday night in order to win.
Look at some the ghosts the Cowboys will be battling this Saturday night; such as Andy Reid and McNabb have never lost a first round playoff game, or how about the Cowboys have never beaten anyone 3 times in one season in their 50 year history? There is of course the 13 years and counting drought of playoff victories, (even the Redskins have won a playoff game in the past decade). Meanwhile the Cowboys head into this weekend with some of their personnel dealing with their own personal demons; such as Romo who is constantly disparaged (unfairly) for never having won a playoff game and Wade (perhaps somewhat fairly) criticized for having an 0-4 record in the playoffs (0-5 record in “win or go home” situations if count last year’s 44-6 debacle).
The wild card round offers a huge weekend of rematches this year as every game features teams that have already seen each other in 2009; 3 of these matchups are back to back meetings which is unheard of. The last time a back to back occurrence happened was in 2001 when the Eagles and Bucs played in week 17 and the wild card round, while the Jets and Raiders also faced each over the course of those same two weeks. The results; the Eagles won both games while the Jets and Raiders split, with Oakland taking the playoff win.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the iggles may have not turned up anything exotic but maybe it was because they tried that approach last
time and romo was did well against them when they were blitzing a lot in philly. I think McDermot tried to confuse romo with zone and hoped he would press; they also probably thought that Samuel could handle Austin one-on-one but Austin was making plays on him. I think what Austin showed them led to the slants and witten having a good day against them. I think McDermot realized after the 1st half that the zone approach with coverage was not going to work; hanson could not cover crayton or witten.
I think that McDermot will have to go all out and live and die by the blitz; even if dallas repeatedly burns his blitz and is down 14-0 he will blitz every chance he gets until there is not time left in the game; it is the only card he has to play against dallas defense, because he secondary has holes and the middle is open for slot WR and TE to make plays. Dallas will be expecting the blitz early and often, but if the running game works as well as it did last sunday then that will help negate the blitz too. Dallas’ offense vs. iggles defense is going to decide the game, because their defense has nowhere to go but up, their offense will play better and score some points this time; but I think the defense will not get above 20 points especially if dallas has 40 minutes of TOP.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
The One Important Point
that keeps being mentioned, not only by the players and staff, but by the MSM is how different this team is from years past. How they are more committed to each other and how hungry they are. Just looking at the past three games is ample proof for me because it is contrary to their past history. Need more proof? OCC can provide all of the stats better than anyone I have ever known, but it’s the feeling of this team that gives me reason to believe. One thing I am sure of is that McDermott will throw the kitchen sink at Romo Saturday.
"You have to have a stronger belief in yourself than the disbelief of others."
Antonio Ramirez Romo
Not alone...but...
Okay, first off, we all know how this team can disappoint in the most critical of circumstances. That is the emotional aspect of why I’m worried about Saturday night.
Take out the emotion and three things make me feel good about the game:
1) The Cowboys DOMINATED the line of scrimmage, particularly on offense…our poor runs were going for 3 yards. As long as we continue to get that kind of push up front, their blitz may put more pressure on Romo and maybe stack up a few more runs BUT those 15 yard runs from Felix become 60 yards to the house. That slant to Austin for 20 yards becomes a TD.
2) We played nowhere near a perfect game on offense last week (drive killing penalties, missed FG, etc.) and still kicked their proverbial tail. We have room for improvement here…
3) Tony seems to have taken a huge quantum leap forward in awareness/ball security. If he doesn’t make major mistakes, then all that Philly has left is the threat of the big play, which our D has shut down effectively both games this year.
The best, and in my opinion, only, chance the Eagles have to win this game is to come out and punch our D in the mouth early, get up a couple of TD’s on big plays (or turnovers), and quiet the crowd. Here’s to scoring on our first drive and reminding them they’re in for another long night.
GO COWBOYS!!!!!
I have noticed a new resurgence in Cowboy hating in 2007, which can only mean one thing- We're back.
All the talk about the Eagles "holding back"
just doesn’t ring true with me.
More likely, I feel almost like the Eagles came into the game last week believing all the hype the national media had given them.
I could see Philly thinking “We always finish strong, and Dallas always fizzles. All we have to do is show up and they will fold like a house of cards…”
Well, maybe not that simple, but it sure seemed like Dallas was playing at a level of intensity that Reid and Co. couldn’t handle.
To me, all the pressure is on Philly. No one expected this level of performance from Dallas.
Is Dallas going to be overconfident this weekend, I don’t think so. Are they going to be riding the momentum from last weekend? I sure hope so.
Philadelphia is the one that should be in cold sweats this week.
that which doesn't kill you, probably hurts like hell.
What bothers me...
is how this is now all playing out in terms of expectations. The Cowboys are hot. Three straight wins, beating the undefeated Saints and pitching two shutouts. And they beat the Eagles twice already. All the columnists covering both teams are saying the Cowboys have very favorable matchups. They should win. Vegas is also picking them to win. In a nutshell, it all comes down to this:
The Eagles Can’t Win, but the Cowboys Can Lose
For all the talk about good chemistry, favorable matchups, peaking at the right time, home field advantage….the game is still played on the field where anything can happen. So hell yes I am concerned. Confident but wary. The sh$t will hit the fan if we don’t pull it out Saturday.
Good way of putting it
“Confident but wary.”
My brother said something interesting though: “I think if the Cowboys were to screw up they would have screwed up already.”
Makes sense to me.
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 11-5!!!
2009 New York Jets: not 11-5 :(, but PLAYOFFS!!!
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25, despite the recent molestation at the hands of the Lakers
I think the pressure on both teams is pretty even.
Dallas has to get its 1st playoff win and it is a tough situation; the iggles are the team that has been a tough out and they have to be beaten a 3rd time to knock them out. That is a lot to have on your plate, no one will say after this game that if dallas wins it was against a scrub wildcard team that dallas beat; this victory is not only challenging but will provide vindication and confidence to win any playoff game they have this year.
The iggles have their past history dictacting the expectations on what is expected of them this year; they are the defending NFC champs, their coach does not lose opening playoff games, they always show up for the big games (they choke when they are favored) especially against dallas, they were embarrased and will play better. A lot of expectations are on this team to win, so they are under some pressure as well, especially if they get swept out of the playoffs by one of their most hated rivals after going on a 6 game winning streak (4 of 5 on the road) to end it with two straight losses to the boys will be a collosal failure to the season.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Excellent points here...
Although the Eagles are not the defending NFC champs the Cardinals are. ;-)
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
Concern yes...
I’m concerned when they play anyone.
I guess I’m not concerned with overconfidence or anything like that. I think that if they lose it will be because they are out executed not because of overconfidence.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 6, 2010 10:12 AM CST reply actions
Why I think we will win ...
1. We simply dominated them on both lines.
2. For every reason last week’s game “woulda-coulda-shoulda” been closer, there’s a counter point … they missed a FG, so did we… they turned the ball over in the red zone, so did we… they missed a sure TD pass, so did we… all their “upside” potential from this weekend is no greater than our own.
3. We WANT it just as much … don’t think for a moment the Cowboys have forgotten the taste of 44-6. And don’t think for a moment they want to spend another off-season fretting about the Iggs…
4. It’s time … too many streaks that need to end eventually, and too many reasons this is the team to do it.
5. Finally: we’re simply a better football team, from top to bottom.
Doomsday returns... Wade Phillips style.
No win is an easy win-
but how much more could they have done to give you confidence? Thats as well as we could’ve played overall
Marine by trade, Cowboys fan by birth.
I think the point is “Any Given Sunday”.
Now as an Eagles fan, obviously I’m concerned and I can only hope that Reid and the Eagles can play all their cards to get it done, but you guys are looking good — very good. Either way, anything can happen. Everyone eventually loses and teams eventually win (even if it takes 19 losses!).
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Ghosts don't
block
run
throw
catch
tackle
or do anything else to win or lose a football game.
Who was more “experienced,” Jim Kelly or Troy Aikman? The better teams win, period.
"The better teams win, period"
Wow. That’s not true. That’s why they have the cliche on ‘any given Sunday.’ If the Eagles win on Saturday, are you then conceding they are the better team? On that night, yes, but overall I don’t think so. Did you think the Giants were better than the undefeated Patriots? And how do you define “better team.” Talent, coaching, execution or simply the outcome on that particular game?
by Boundforbeach on Jan 6, 2010 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
hmmm...
The better teams win, period.
Based on this theory the Giants are clearly a better team than the Cowboys this year.
The 2009 Dallas Cowboys: Talk to me in December.
The NFC East has won 11 Super Bowls; oddly none of those have come courtesy of the Eagles.
Jason Witten said it best talking to ...
BTB earlier this year. He said something about not getting too high or too low. By every indication, this team is focused. They have had the same defense and same offense for 3 years now. So familiarity is here. The talent has been here. Despite what the pundits say, they have played in big games and won (Green Bay a couple years ago, Indy three years ago, New Orleans this year, etc.). Most of all …. they know failure, they’ve tasted that sour pill, and I just don’t think they are content with it.
Many point out that “Philly didn’t blitz”, but fail to recognize that Garrett got them in their nickel D and just exploited it with run and pass. They really didn’t get a chance to do anything.
by spadesking131313 on Jan 6, 2010 10:44 AM CST reply actions
Philly looked at the film from the first game.
They didn’t blitz as much because they wanted to see if Dallas would over prepare for the blitz and then chuck the ball into coverage. They blitzed like crazy in the first game and lost. They tried to do it differently this game to see if it would make a difference. Teams study the last four games in prep so everything the Eagles didn’t do will still be reviewed and prepped. The Cowboys are better than the Eagles. Our lines will dominate theirs and we will win. My only concern is the fluke play. Otherwise, I believe we will beat them.
Don't turn the ball over
and don’t have horrible ST play and it should be ok. If McNabb had a reputation for being super accurate or if the Eagle running game was considered really potent there might be cause for concern but neither are the case.
"Champagne for my real friends, real pain for my sham friends."
by DatNguyenNguyenScenario on Jan 6, 2010 11:46 AM CST up reply actions
My guess would be
that a large amount of phily’s lack of blitzing had to do with our ability to totally avid long yardage situations our first 3 drives. On top of that, Romo was in shotgun and we ran a spread offense a lot, making it MUCH riskier to blitz him given he already knows if its man or zone from the alignment. On top of all that, their defene has been much more suspect recently, I think they tried to play the bend but don’t break game and it bit them in the a**.
There is no freakin way philly went light in this game. No way. That was round 1 of the playoffs for them with the potential to have a home playoff game in round 2. If Philly held back, Reid/McDermott should be fired.
"If Philly held back, Reid/McDermott should be fired."
Unless, of course, Philly wins on Saturday, in which case the Cowboys coaches should be fired.
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
Philly's not a bad team
from the perspective that Wade/Garrett just lost one game, i don’t think so. We frankly got bounces and timely calls goign our way the first two games. If they go Philly’s way, who knows what would happen – though they wouldn’t win the second game anyway.
From the perspective that this team has lost two home playoff games in 3 years and we’ve had problems in december 2 of the 3…yes jerry should strongly consider firing wade.
You mean like the "bounce"interception Romo threw? While not his fault that definitely went the Iggles way...
You can’t say we didn’t have an equal number of stuff go against us as well. I seem to remember enough yellow laundry to fill up a laundry mat along with a couple of bad plays and the interception!
Just remember excuses are like a$$holes and if you are the Iggles you have a whole team of them.
I don't think
that there were that many bounces and timely calls that didn’t go both ways.
Dallas just out executed Philly, definitly in the second game.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 6, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
the first game
philly had bunches of plays brought back by calls, some of which were irrelevant to the play.
We definitely outplayed them in the second game.
Yeah
there were some calls but I think they were the right calls.
by The Immortal Iron Fist AKA AFB on Jan 6, 2010 3:00 PM CST up reply actions
I expect the game to be closer
but I don’t see what Philly could possibly do differently to change the outcome. The Cowboys thoroughly kiced their ass on Sunday on both sides of the ball. How many times was an Eagle seen limping of the field? How many passes were dropped over the middle because a Philly player heard footsteps? They were intimidated.
This certainly gives Dallas a psychological advnatage. However, it also gives Philly a sense of nothing to lose.
If Dallas doesn’t get tight, they will win again.
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
I don't think philly has "nothing to lose"
they were the nfc’s hottest team last week (whatever that means). Their season is on the line agains their hated rival and another offensive embarassment could very well lead to a change at the qb position.
Nothing to lose...
in terms of they just got whipped and if they lose again Saturday, it won’t really be a surprise. If they pull out a win in the game that really matters, nobody will remember the game from Sunday.
In an odd sense, it does put a little extra pressure on Dallas not to be the team that wins when it doesn’t matter and lose when it does.
Do not worry. (Matthew 6:27)
As far as being concerned..
Heck yes, I am. We haven’t won a playoff game in forever. There will be definitely pressure on this team and if philly scores first, this may very well turn into a dogfight that either team has an equal shot at winning.
Looking at the highlights, Philly missed tons of plays they usualymake. THey dropped practically every contested pass and McNabb stunk. The law of averages says they will execute at least a few of those plays better next week.
I’ve seen this offense struggle too many times this year to give them my complete faith after 2 good outings the last 3 games. But I do like our chances.
The offense has struggled against defenses that make all offenses struggle.
That defense is not on the Eagles team.
"Brett Favre is the best quarter back to play since Roger Goodell" my cube mate. UGHHH
Hard not to be concerned
when all the good feeling of the last three weeks could be wiped away by a loss. But I keep thinking about Raf (or was it Dave’s) post concerning playoff teams Achilles heal—Dallas just might have Philly’s number this year or at least I am hoping.
by Dave Chappelle Jr. AKA Felix Jones on Jan 6, 2010 11:51 AM CST reply actions
This idea that, because something hasn't happened recently, it's less likely to happen again, is something I just can't wrap my head around.
Go out and do it. That’s all.
I think if you put two of my best seasons together it wouldn't come up with the numbers he's going to have at the end of the season. -Troy Aikman on Tony Romo
Philly's DC
stated they got burned early when they blitzed on some MBIII runs and they backed out of it. His subsequent statements imply that he now feels that was a mistake.
I still contend the matchups have turned in our favor because of extensive injuries/substitutes on their O LIne and LB’s. Our QB pressure and run stuffing evidence of the former and our WR’s were getting past the first levels of pass defenders on slants and over the middle with regularity. I will admit when PHL did blitz we did not screen well for the most part in response. That needs to be tightened up if they’re going to blitz as much as everyone expects on SAT.
PHL always scares me – Reid overall is a good coach, but subject to brain cramps in pass/run balance and clock management. McNabb is completely capable of deliverable stunning performances – bad or good. More in our favor this season is their DB’s can be had(Dawkins is sorely missed), their running game is average at best.
One demon hanging over the Cowboys has been exorcised – the me-first, team second attitude that killed us last year. And with it, the ’can’t win in DEC/late season mantra’. Two ghosts remain – the Seattle slip and playoff fail of ‘07. Romo is haunted by the 1st, but is shedding that with each big game success. Phillips entire perception has been skewed by that Giants game, an almost ’unforgivable’ failure in the eyes of the DAL faithful. Until now.
Always be more than you appear and never appear to be more than you are
I am concerned...
as will I always be.. I’m a true blue Cowboy fan and I am concerned every week with every team. The Eagles can win the game Saturday if we don’t bring our ‘A’ game.
Go Cowboys!
2010 is OUR year.
Maybe...
…people have hyped up this game and the “revenge” factor so much that the Cowboys will feel once again feel the need to prove something. Not that I think that they don’t have enough drive already, but…
blitz
what i heard was that dallas went to empty backfield with no rb or te to help block on alot of passing downs. this forced philly to show their coverage sooner. and that allowed romo to see whether it was zone or what.
It would take a massive "crap the bed" effort for Dallas to lose.
Philly needs interceptions, fumbles, and general ineptitude on the Cowboys’ part to win this game. And I haven’t seen a whole lot of that lately.
The reason to be concerned isn't really anything to do w/the last game, but the first victory
Which was just about an even game, with one MAustin bomb the difference.
They really shut down the Cowboys O that game, and will go back to that gameplan.
Dallas does not show the ability to run against heavy blitzing usually, and the running game was the difference. I expect the Boys’ offense to struggle a lot more this time, like the earlier game.
Then the question becomes: Will they feel the pressure and tighten up, or remain calm and execute?
Still, as far as our D vs. their O, they have no running game, so while they probably will break through and score and hit some long gains, we should be able to hold them to 20 or less.
Pessimists say the cup is half-empty, while optimists say it's half-full. Well, isn't it both? Realist Larry, 2009
This whole "matchup" thing is overblown and lulling fans into a false sense of confidence
Dallas needs to prepare for a different team Saturday night or it could be another playoff nightmare for us.
Simple fact: teams that get destroyed by an opponent they know well, generally come back with a much different performance the next time around.
Too many fans on here are predicting a similar outcome to last week and I fear they might be overreacting to a crappy performance by Philly. Remember, this is an Andy reid coached team. they know how to turn up their level of play in the playoffs.
"Emotion is highly overrated in football. My wife Corky is emotional as hell but can't play football worth a damn."
- John McKay, the first coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I still think the biggest thing is that Philadelphia is probably the weakest playoff team
It has been mentioned that they have only one win against a team over .500 (Atlanta without starting QB and TB). Also, like it was mentioned, a couple of ghosts have been exorcised already. Time to finish off the rest of them. I mean they haven’t won a playoff game since ’96 but they also have never shutout two opponents in a row. How about a third and the same one twice. That would be nice.

by 




















