Are The Cowboys Systematically Grading O-Line Prospects Too Low?
A lot of discussion about the Cowboys in the recent weeks, months and even years has centered around the O-Line and the seeming inability of the Cowboys to draft offensive linemen. BTB's own rabblerousr analyzed the issue in a lot of detail two months ago and eloquently argued that the Cowboys scouts apparently don't have the ability to recognize what makes an NFL-caliber offensive lineman, as evidenced by the Cowboys' long list of questionable draft decisions. The relegation of 2009 third round pick Robert Brewster to the practice squad recently just adds another name to round out the chamber of drafting horrors that have been the Cowboys offensive linemen.
And then there's the one that got away: On draft day 2009, the Cowboys thought they had scored a bargain when Oregon center Max Unger slipped down the draft board. They were ready to pick him in spot 51, but the Seahawks cut a deal with Bears and swiped him with the 49th pick.
More recently, BTB-member Chandus argued that "I believe that they’re mis-calculating the draft prospects ratings, if a lot of teams think that the same prospect that you’re rating in the 4th Round is actually a 3rd Rounder, you’re the one with the problem." Now that is a statement that we can put to the test. How? After the break we look at the Cowboys 2010 draft board and see if and how badly the Cowboys missed on their grades.
Shortly after the 2010 draft, a group of highly industrious BTB bloggers painstakingly decoded a video shot in the Cowboys draft room that showed the Cowboys draft board. As a result, we know the names and draft grades of 125 players on the Cowboys draft board.
Today, we look at how the Cowboys graded the offensive linemen on their draft board relative to where those players were actually picked in the draft.
O-Linemen: Cowboys grade vs actual draft spot, 2010 (click column header to sort)
| Round | Pick |
Team | Player | Position | Cowboys Grade |
Difference |
| 1 | 4 | WAS | Trent Williams | T | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 6 | SEA | Russell Okung | T | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 17 | SFO | Mike Iupati | G | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 18 | PIT | Maurkice Pouncey | C | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 23 | GNB | Bryan Bulaga | T | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 11 | SFO | Anthony Davis | T | 3 | -2 |
| 2 | 33 | STL | Rodger Saffold | T | 3 | -1 |
| 2 | 45 | DEN | Zane Beadles | G | 3 | -1 |
| 2 | 61 | NYJ | Vladimir Ducasse | T | 4 | -2 |
| 3 | 68 | KAN | Jon Asamoah | G | 3 | 0 |
| 3 | 73 | MIA | John Jerry | T | 4 | -1 |
| 3 | 98 | ATL | Mike Johnson | G | 4 | -1 |
| 3 | 92 | CLE | Shawn Lauvao | G | 5 | -2 |
| 3 | 69 | OAK | Jared Veldheer | T | 6 | -3 |
| 4 | 129 | IND | Jacques McClendon | G | 6 | -2 |
| 5 | 147 | NYG | Mitch Petrus | G | 4 | 1 |
| 6 | 179 | DAL | Sam Young | T | 5 | 1 |
Note that these are only the players the Cowboys appear to have had on their boards. A couple of names were indecipherable or simply obscured, and some notable lineman drafted fairly high like Charles Brown (2, 64), J.D. Walton (3, 80) or Bruce Campbell (4, 106) may or may not have been missing from the draft board. We'll never know with absolute certainty.
Nevertheless, we do know a couple of things. The Cowboys did have a first round grade on five of the six lineman taken in the first round. Surprisingly, they had Anthony Davis graded as only a third rounder while he ended up being the third lineman chosen in the draft overall. But five of six isn't all that bad.
It's in the later rounds that it gets really bad. The Cowboys didn't have a single lineman with a second round grade, yet three were taken in the second round.
Of the 12 lineman on the Cowboys board with a third round grade or lower, nine (or 75%) were graded at least one round lower than where they were eventually picked, one (Jon Asamoah) was graded in line with where he was picked and two (Mitch Petrus and Sam Young) were graded higher than where they were picked. This is not good.
Again, I'll just quote Chandus here because he summarizes the situation very well.
There’s more staff than just the Coaches and Jerry, the team has a scouting department that reviews film and conducts interviews and visits with prospects, and they also have a group of people that reviews the team from within and hands down their impressions to the Coaches and Jerry (weaknesses and strengths).
What we’ve seen is the result of the sum of what the Cowboys are and were they’re stuck in. They had chances to draft decent prospects, but didn’t because the scouting department view them as lower prospects as the competition or because the staff believed that they didn’t fit what they wanted on the field.
It’s easy to point at their mistakes, it’s harder to point at what they’re doing right, we can only hope that they get better at drafting OLine prospects and quick.
In economic terms, what we have here is a seller's market: In a seller's market there are more buyers than sellers, and high prices result from this excess of demand over supply. Translated to the NFL, this means that there are not enough linemen to meet the demand of NFL teams. As a result you likely have to overpay in terms of draft picks to get one.
The Cowboys' draft grades may be correct in terms of player quality/potential and fit with the Cowboys - or they may be incorrect, I'm in no position to judge. But it doesn't matter one bit. If you're grading 75% of the players (outside of first-rounders) below where they'll get picked, the likelihood of getting a lineman by sticking to your draft board is pretty slim. And the Seahawks may just swoop in again and grab another prospect right from under your nose.
Quality linemen are a scarce commodity. Other teams are 'paying' for their O-linemen with higher draft picks. If the Cowboys want to fix their line, they'll likely have to do the same. We only have one draft board to go against, but the Unger example and the history of the Cowboys drafts suggests that the 'mis-grading' of O-line talent is a persistent issue for the Cowboys.
Tomorrow, we'll look at the other position groups. The 75% 'mis-graded' rate for O-linemen (outside of first-rounders) is they highest of any Cowboys position group. But which group do you think will come in second?
70 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We need a 1st-2nd Round caliber O-linemen
We can’t expect to throw some fat guy out onto the field who is a 7th round pick and expect him to be the next Willie Roaf.
"People ask me what I do in winter when there’s no baseball. I’ll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. " ~Rogers Hornsby
Follow me on Twitter! @YankeeCountry2
Well that's not true
Isn’t that why Jerry drafted Sam Young this year?
by cryinsilverblustars4eva on Nov 11, 2010 4:46 PM CST up reply actions
There's another issue too
The Pokes seem to want the biggest O-lineman on the planet, and it’s not working. Perhaps it’s time to start looking at lineman that actually have some athletic ability instead of just being able to have tug-of-wars with elephants. Bigg can pull a horse out of a ditch, but he can’t block a speed rusher. For that matter he’s also losing to the elephants too.
If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got an electrical problem.
How interesting
The only good OL we have starting for us right now is Doug Free who isn’t the typical normal Cowboy OL draft pick or player they usually want for their OL.
by cryinsilverblustars4eva on Nov 11, 2010 4:48 PM CST up reply actions
Is Max Unger even playing that well?
Last time I checked he wasn’t, but I don’t know how he is doing this year.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
He's out for the season on IR
He started all 16 games last year, but was placed on season-ending IR with a “turf toe” like injury requiring surgery after starting in week one this year.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 11, 2010 8:41 AM CST up reply actions
and how are playing the second rounders?
i saw the other day beadles is starteer on the broncos, that surprised me, he must be doint it well but don’t know about the others
It's definitely safety
Our corners look much worse than they are because of the poor safety play.
In Romo we Trust
Nope
Safety looks surprisingly ok. Again, this is just a look at 2010. It might have been – and probably was – a total disaster in previous years.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 11, 2010 9:00 AM CST up reply actions
The other unaddressed long-term need. They need a star at that position, just like
the best Ds in the league have. What would I give for a Troy Polamalu? He’s out and the Steelers D isn’t a juggernaut anymore; he comes back, and they can win without their starting QB.
Get Jerry more involved with o-line drafts
he obviously knows what he’s doing.
It's utterly baffling. Is it another case of JJ being too loyal to people who
simply aren’t doing a good job? I’m even having doubts about draft picks the Cowboys have made over the last few years that, at the time, I thought were good. At the same time, they seem to be able to suss out those quality undrafted free agents. Either that, or they’ve just been lucky there.
All I know is, years of passing on O line picks has caught up with the Cowboys over the last three seasons, and, given how proactive JJ seems in other ways, his turning a blind eye to this issue is bizarre.
by Fernie67 on Nov 11, 2010 8:58 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Follow the money
Jerry handcuffs himself by overpaying for free agents to make up for the lack of drafting OLineman, then doesn’t want to spend what would have to be slotted for higher draft picks.
The line was faltering back when Bill came along. He wasn’t much better at drafting them, but he could find a diamond in the rough like Columbo to shore up a weakness. Now within four years we’re back to “can’t run block, can’t pass block”.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
But it's more than just the money. He's willing to pay other kinds of positions
but seems to have an allergy to drafting high and paying big for the O line. Has JJ decided he’d rather pay money for what he considers proven players, so he resorts to free agency? Drafting is always a crap shoot, no matter the position.
I also continue to believe that JJ just didn’t consider enough the extent to which Romo made the line look better than they are and engaged in a bit of magical thinking that this could go on forever without his franchise QB getting hurt.
Its not just O line
Julius Jones vs Steven Jackson
Felix Jones vs Rashard Mendenhall
I know Parcells was here for the latter, but its still the Cowboys organization. The list goes on as Jerry continues his quest to repeat the triplets.
Redskins Suck
by BleedBlueStar on Nov 11, 2010 10:34 AM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't bring Mendenhall up, but Felix Jones versus Chris Johnson may be more valid.
I say “may be” because both Felix and Chris have to have a modicum of run blocking to be effective, and Chris doesn’t have to share time (he briefly did with Lendale White, but that stopped REAL quick).
Also, Chris had a passing game that was barely acceptable, versus Tony Romo.
Thus Chris was the centerpiece of the offense, while Felix has only been a bit part. I do wish Felix’s role would increase more.
well...
seem as Dallas got it right….
Teams just been beating Dallas to these guys.. & sum teams may draft these guys a lil early too..
I know there was a lot of garbage out about Davis & was glad Dallas didnt draft him,.
i know that Ducasse kid was drafted way to early!!!!!!!! He was yank and bench in preaseason.. the rest of those guys is a giv and take thing.. it differ by boards .. and team needs how early they will be taken…
Also Charles Brown was injured so he had a red flag o him.. that is y JJ may hav skip on him in the 2nd round…
I know Burnnett had a 2nd rd grade on him and was taken in the 3rd.. Cj had a 1 or 2nd rd grade on him but was taken in the 1st … so its a giv and take thing
& plz!!!!!!!!! no more we shud hav taken Loadholt !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that guy is trash!!!!!!!!!!!!
But which group do you think will come in second?
defensive line.
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Nov 11, 2010 9:43 AM CST reply actions
It's a conundrum
I don’t know exactly how to make heads or tails out of that info, except to say that the Schramn, Brandt, Landry regime were not averse at all to drafting a good lineman high: Ralph Neely, John Niland; or to taking a good football player, even a defensive end, and turning him into a good lineman: Rayfield Wright, Mark Tuinei.
Jimmy/Jerry had success finding a jewel in a little lower round: Larry Allen, Nate Newton, Erik Williams; but I believe Mark Stepnowski was a 1st or 2nd rounder.
If you don’t have good OL play, what do you have?
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
If you don’t have good OL play, what do you have?
a bad team
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
close enough for me
Lifetime Cowboys Fan from the Swamps of Jersey
My Beer Blog: http://tiltingsuds.wordpress.com/
Mark Stepnowski was a 1st or 2nd rounder.
If you don’t have good OL play, what do you have?
2nd.
Not much.
"What a gorgeous dog. What do you feed him?"
actually Stepnoski was a 3rd rounder in '89
Aikman was the first rounder and Moose was the second rounder that year.
In Romo we Trust
Larry Allen was drafted in 1994
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
But which group do you think will come in second?
defensive line.
upon further consideration … I’m going to say LB … except it’s the other way.
they’re consistently over-rating them.
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Nov 11, 2010 9:59 AM CST reply actions
Ha ha ha. If this were Mastermind,
you’d get two white pegs for your two answers: White pegs mean you have the correct colors but in the wrong place.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 11, 2010 10:39 AM CST up reply actions
Not just an drafting issue......
It appears that we also have the same issue evaluating the talent on the team……..while they seem to have hit on Doug Free, they did not see the downward spiral that the rest of the Oline have started on (seemingly all at once)……
There are 5 Olinemen (starters) and I would guess that the avg life of a starting Olineman is less than 10 years, goes to reason, that we need to be hitting on drafting a starting Olineman every other year…….and as you can see, it has not been happening
He who laughs last, thinks slowest
I don't know if they're under valueing OL or not
As you noted, we only have one board to go off of, so we have no idea where other teams are ranking these guys. One team biting the bullet and moving up doesn’t mean that’s where everyone else had him ranked. Darious Heyward Bey was taken by the Raiders high in the 1st, but that’s not an accurate value. It only takes one team to reach and it becomes somewhat skewed. Rather than a value ranking issue I think it’s more of a PRIORITY issue. If they placed more of a priority on fixing the OL then they would maybe take a chance on someone a little earlier than their board says they should. Of course, they’d first have to acknowledge that they have a problem and that hasn’t been one of Jerruh’s strong points.
"I just wrote the check, it's up to you guys to cash it!" - Jimmy Johnson to defense after failed attempt on 4th down deep inside Cowboy territory. AND THEY DID!!!!
The Sad Truth
is that this years Oline talent coming out isn’t all that great. Hopefully some good Jr’s declare and bolster it up a little. As of right now, I don’t see a top olineman in the first 15 spots of this draft. That’s not very good and doesn’t bode well for us to solidify our line depth through the draft this year. We are going to have to focus on the OLine through FA and addres other needs (secondary and Dline) in the draft.
look
we have good draft scouts. Tom Cizkowski is a really good scout but the problem is they need to fix their OL grading system, its awful. Also they need to fix their SS FS grading system because that is a complete joke as well. Other than that I think we have a good grading system in set. I know they will fix this because its the area’s we are really hurting in now. Again take Patrick Peterson and if Deandre McDaniel slips to us in the 2nd Im taking him too because he reminds me of Morgan Burnett, the guy we should of drafted in the 2nd rd. Its time to man up and spend money a good saftey in free agency or draft one.
all of our problems go back to this 2009 draft
if we traded 8 of those 12 picks for Patrick Chung Louis Delmas Phil Loadholt Sebastian Volmer we would be in alot better spot right now
by Archie Barberio on Nov 11, 2010 10:28 AM CST reply actions
How would you know
Our grading system is set? What a joke, I do not know their grading system and I doubt anyone really knows whats going on there, if we did, we would have seen this debacle coming and not making super bowl plans. This entire franchise has a disease and its called WhereIsJimmyJohnsonITIS
Redskins Suck
it still comes back to the grades the scouts are giving them
the coaches go by what the scouts report especially in the later rounds so that seems to be the biggest problem.
it really sounds like Jerry needs to revamp his scouting department with people who understand the value of certain positions. maybe he needs to inject some youth in those areas with the landscape of the draft chaging & how successful franchises are building there teams.
this team has a lot of holes besides just on the OL/DL & its going to take a couple drafts if thats the route they go or some FA signings for a quick fix. we have holes at both safety positions (unless AoA FS & Church SS work out), ILB (Lee is the only youth we have), CB (Scandrick is either a bad fit or he’s regressed a lot/Ball just needs to be cut/maybe McCann has some potential but they need to find out asap) & TE (Witten & Phillips are solid TEs but we blew the MartyB pick).
were going to need a solid draft this April & hopefully they can secure a few potential starters out of it. i think the Giants GM did that a few years ago & its paying off big time now so maybe we can snag a couple of scouts from them or the Ravens.
the definition of insanity should have a picture of Jerry Jones next to it. he has no idea what he is doing or that its wrong...
i highly doubt D.McDaniel slips to the 2nd
he was one of the main reasons Clemson almost knocked off Arburn & Cam Newton. that was a signature game for him & if Arburn goes on to win it all, it’ll only raise his stock bc he hasn’t been stopped since.
the definition of insanity should have a picture of Jerry Jones next to it. he has no idea what he is doing or that its wrong...
In the post OCC references
my larger point was that the Cowboys seemed unwilling to trade up—to spend the extra draft picks—for an offensive lineman. If we accept this, then the fact that they tend to underrate lower-round o-line prospects is particularly problematic. Apparently, the Cowboys won’t spend a premium pick (or a combo of picks—and then can’t scoop up a mid-round prospect because, according to their draft board, they don’t believe they’ll get “value” for him.
As a result, Dallas’s scouts shop at the o-line bargain bin—and we’re stuck wearing the sweater that was picked over by everybody else.
a guy like shanahan always seems to find OL for his system
maybe it’s time, as one commenter already noted, to change the system. maybe if we were looking for a different /kind/ of OL, we could find them and coach them up. as great as houck was in the 90s, i’m just not seeing it over these last years.
While I appreciate that a great deal of effort went into this analysis, I would caution that this is based on draft selection, not performance on the field. Many of those players taken in the first round listed above will never amount to anything. At this point, only the Pittsburgh center looks like a bona fide star. And he was the fourth offensive lineman taken.
I would echo what White Wolf says above, the Cowboys seem to be enamored with the size above all. I remember a few years ago Chris Mortensen was doing his training camp bus trip. When he got to the Cowboys camp, he went on the air raving about their size, saying that they were the biggest team he had seen, they were fast, they were great, et cetera, et cetera. At that point he had been to more than 20 training camps.
Well, we all know what the performance has been. Once again, Jerry chose style (size) over substance (character, effort), and the team results have shown it.
there is no free lunch
we can say that 42 percent of the variance in team scores can be accounted for by nothing more than random sample error. The 16-game season is too small of a sample to provide much confidence that team records accurately reflect their "true" level of ability. The more games in a season, the smaller the sample error, and the more certain we could be that the teams with the better records are truly the better teams.
There’s a huge amount of randomness in the NFL. Don’t forget that if you look at the metrics which are the best predictors (efficiency stats, success rate) of future success Dallas’s offense looked like it was good enough to go to the SB (this isn’t a Carolina situation) … and Dallas was subject to a lot of bad luck (and what’s really killing Dallas now is the Romo injury and the pass defense)
If one assumes 2 of the losses were due to randomness and you flip those to wins it’s a 3-5 record … which looks a lot like the SD … and frankly I think SD has a decent chance to win the SB.
So now I get to the no free lunch point. There’s no free lunch … you can’t assume you can have all the toys AND a good offensive line .. there’s a trade off. A better OL has to be paid for somehow. If you want more OL do you mean you wouldn’t have drafted Dez? What would you get rid of? (keeping in mind that you probably had a SB quality offense).
I think any analysis that says improve the OL without saying what sacrifice to do it is flawed.
My recommendation would be to trade RB for OL. But that’s just me.
How would you pay for the OL improvement?
by Fan in Thick and Thin on Nov 11, 2010 11:51 AM CST reply actions
I would not only sacrifice RB depth, but I would also sacrifice TE depth.
If Phillips comes back from injury and plays like he did pre-injury there is no way we need Witten, Bennett, and Phillips. Plus, a better O-line likely means less 2-TE sets as we could protect easier and therefore put more WRs on the field (and run 3 WRs, 1 TE versus 2 WR, 2 TE).
Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels
I agree with this.
Before we can evaluate whatever RBs we plug into the offense, we need a line that can open holes for them. The guys I’d trade are: Barber, Felix, and Witten.
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
The patriot way is the way to draft linemen
Patriots draft primarily LEFT tackles. 3 of there 5 starters were left tackles in college, and are therefore athletic comfortable playing in space. As an example just look at what Free did at right tackle last year. An all left tackle strategy also gives you the flexibility of interchangeable parts, any guy could play any position, and allows you to get your best five on the field. I think it is an excellent methodology.
I am also, not unconvinced that Martellus Bennett’s best position might not be left tackle. He is big athletic, shows a meant streak when blocking, and most importantly 6’6" and 265.
I agree with what you are saying.
I have hated for years how the Cowboys draft guys whose question marks are often their mobility. There was a great post by Luke last offseason about the Cowboys chosen template and the problems it has in practice.
Formerly Cowboyfan729
If I had a nickel for every time the Eagles won the Super Bowl, I would have zero nickels
You know what, this might not be a crazy idea
I am also, not unconvinced that Martellus Bennett’s best position might not be left tackle. He is big athletic, shows a meant streak when blocking, and most importantly 6’6" and 265.
I’m just wondering if this move should have been done earlier? What do you guys think?
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
It's an idea, but it would be a commitment as he would have to gain some weight...
but he can block and he is athletic. But if he failed, he’d probably be too slow with the added weight to go back to TE.
There’s a side benefit though, he could always report as eligible – like in the red zone where he could sneak out to receive
When in doubt, empty your magazine
O-Linemen
Great article. Explains a lot about the problem in the trenches. Now let’s fix it Jason.
Regarding Anthony Davis
I live in the Bay Area right now, I’ve had the unfortunate experience of watching my share of 49ers games, as one of my friends covers them, and I must say, Davis looks terrible. He’s easily been the worst offensive lineman for them this year. He does not look like a first rounder at all. JMO.
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
My my my
you’ve bought into the new and improved Cowboys quickly. Nice avatar pic. Nice tagline.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 11, 2010 1:03 PM CST up reply actions
After two press conferences, I want to strap on some pads, put on a helmet and hit something.
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
And he's doing it again today
4:15 on Sunday (he said with a smile). Go Forward. Have A Great Day.
by One.Cool.Customer on Nov 11, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions
Awesome
"The biggest thing we talked about is Going Forward. Like I said, the Giants are going to be at the Meadowlands at 4:15 on Sunday afternoon. We’ve got to get ready for them. So what we need to do is learn from what happened in the past and Go Forward, starting this morning with our meetings, our walk-throughs and our practice."
-Jason Garrett, November 10th, 2010.
Drafting...
So Every Year in the Draft they say, “Don’t reach, take the best player available!” But This is what happens, we rate an offensive lineman further down and the Seahawks, the Steelers, the Patriots swoop in and now we need to replace 4 out of 5 linemen in the next 2 year!
Remember when we complained that Jerry sold the ranch to jump up and get the guy he wanted… well look at us now when we act conservatively! Some times you just have to have the _ _ _ _ s to trust your feelings and instincts and just pull the trigger….
that or go steal the guys up in New England who magically turn picks from this year into higher picks next year (Patriots have 2 picks in each of the first 4 rounds of the draft this year and odds are they will flip at least 2 of those for more next year).
Love Our Cowboys so this let down is killing me. Garrett chew their butts and make them strive for perfection. Re-awaken their desire to strike fear in opponents and make them want to hit and tackle the opponent to the ground…. “to and through the ground” we use to say (meaning pound them!). Then work some of the fat off the O-line into defined muscle in their legs so that they can at least fight well.
Oh, and Garrett when you have the beef-a-lo-s pass block have their first step be INTO the defender then back, it stops them in their tracks BEFORE they get a good head of steam going (which we don’t seem to stop very well).
Completely agree that we are having issues grading olineman
However, just because another team took a player in a different round then when we graded them doesn’t mean that they were right. How have all these players done now that they are in the league. That’s really a better indicator of when they should have been picked.
Another factor . . .
. . . is Hudson Houck! It’s a well-known fact that he prefers veterans and does not develop young linemen well — time for him to retire.
From the hometown of Bob Lilly,
The grading isn't the only problem
If you want to address a position, you’ve got to go after it sometimes. That is especially true about Oline for this team, since they decided to ignore it for years anyway.
Since they were willing to trade up for Dez, and trade up for Lee, it looks like they were reacting to make sure no one was going to make a last minute trade to come right in and pick the players right out from underneath them, like the Unger situation from 09.
The problem is, both Lee and Dez are not Olinemen, so once again, someone has evaluated the existing Oline as good enough, and they weren’t. They need to always be in “re-stock” mode, and they aren’t. The coaches are to blame for this, just as much as the scouts, because they have to be voicing they’re concerns. I don’t think they have. The Oline has been basically ignored for the better part of a decade. What is it going to take for them to get it right? Another year of drafting LB, WR, TE, DL?
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"
My... My...
Excellent work as usual, thanks for getting your hands dirty on all this… I looked up to the amount of work and decided to keep this as a belief or idea…
You pretty much validated my thoughts.
Arnold, almost 5 years of good memories, you'll be missed.
Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by 





















