Performances Of Note From The Cowboys vs. Eagles Game
For those of you that have been on BTB for a while, you know I have been a big fan of the work done by the folks at Pro Football Focus, since they are one of the few sites that record and judge individual performance for all position groups, not just the offensive skill positions. This year, there's only one number that's relevant at PFF, and that is 90. $90, to be exact. PFF have gone premium and are charging $90 for the player stats I used to recite every night before going to bed.
For the longest time, I refused to cough up the money. Not because I felt they were charging too much for their content, but because I am principally and violently opposed to paying for any content whatsoever on the internet. But principles only get you so far and a few weeks ago I caved in, let principles be principles, paid up and have been reveling in their stats ever since. But now I have to get my money's worth from those stats, so today we begin by looking at PFF's game summary of the Eagles - Cowboys game - with a lot more to come over the following days and weeks.
One important disclaimer up front. I personally love the PFF data, but I urge you to use it as a 'guideline' and not as 'the pure unadulterated truth'. We've had the discussions here over and over about the validity of their data, and they usually go something like this: "Hey, look how they graded player XYZ. That can't be right, because I have a completely different opinion of that player. And if they got that player wrong, then surely the rest of their data is junk as well." When one of these discussions popped up, I usually looked at the player stats in detail and often understood why they graded a player a certain way. Doesn't mean I agreed, but for the most part I understood how they arrived at their grades. Read up on their methodology here.
Having said all that, I don't know any of the people reviewing film, I don't even know what kind of film they're reviewing, I have no idea how objective they are in their grading and, most importantly, I don't know which plays they graded well and which they didn't. But, the numbers do make for good discussion. With that out of the way, and with apologies for the lengthy intro, here we go.
In their game summaries, PFF usually focuses on a handful of players and looks at the performances of note. They do exactly that in their game summary of the Eagles @ Cowboys game, starting with Doug Free:
Left tackle Doug Free (+4.3) had his best game of the year against the Eagles. Free’s performance is a perfect example of how to play LT in the NFL. He allowed just one pressure in 42 dropbacks (+1.5 rating in pass protection) but was at this best in the ground game (+2.4), beating up especially on backup DRE Daryl Tapp.
Overall, Free's performance shouldn't come as a great surprise to Cowboys fans. While he initially had TE help at left tackle to start the season, those training wheels quickly came off after the first couple of weeks when it became clear that that help was much more desperately needed on the right side (more on that in a minute).
For the season, PFF grade Free as the best runblocking left tackle in the league and the sixth best left tackle overall. In passblocking, he is still an above average tackle, but over the course of 13 games has given up just a little bit too much pressure (4 sacks, 7 QB Hits, 17 QB pressures according to PFF) to grade out higher.
On the right side, Marc Colombo is having a throwaway season as further evidenced by his performance (-4.2) against the Eagles:
This was Colombo’s fourth game of the season with a grade lower than -4.0 and he was poor in both pass protection and on the ground. Colombo gave up a sack, hit and two pressures in the 42 times Kitna dropped back to pass. He contributed to the 13-yard total gained when running right of the center.
For the season, Colombo has accumulated a -30.2 grade, the second worst grade in the league surpassed only by the Bears' RT J'Marcus Webb. What is particularly alarming is the dropoff from last year. In 2009, Colombo graded out with a +6.1 over the 10 regular season games he played healthy, which ranked him as the number 14 right tackle.
Various leg and knee injuries over the years have slowed Colombo down considerably. Colombo continues to struggle heroically in every game, but it is an indictment of the Cowboys' depth along the line that a guy who's so obviously unfit to play is still on the field every week. On Sunday he'll be facing the Redskins' Brian Orakpo, who leads the Redskins with 8.5 sacks. If Garrett wants a healthy Kitna after four quarters on Sunday, he'll once again have to provide significant help on the right side.
Another player PFF looked at in detail is Jay Ratliff, who they see as the third best 3-4 pass rushing NT in the game ( +11.0 rushing grade is actually up significantly vs 09). They also see him suddenly struggling in run defense this year and have strongly downgraded his run defense accordingly (+13.0 2009, -6.5 in 2010). The Eagles game was no exception to the general trend:
Jay Ratliff (-2.1) is struggling against the run, especially this year. The nose tackle made one tackle (a stop) and an assist for a run-defense grade of -1.7. He is still dangerous as a pass-rusher, however, getting a sack on 20 rushes (which accounted for his other stop). Ratliff also committed a penalty when he jumped offside.
For the season, Ratliff has a +4.8 grade (+11.0 pass rushing, -6.5 run defense). Josh Brent (+3.7) isn’t anywhere near the dominant factor that Jay Ratliff is in the passing game but at times he's looked like a better option against the run (-1.2 pass rushing, +5.3 run defense). Something that the numbers don't necessarily reflect is that more than ever, opposing offenses are keying on double-teaming Ratliff, and if they can get him blocked, there goes the run defense up the middle.
And here's another thing to consider as you look at Ratliff's grades: Marcus Spears was easily the best run defender on the team garnering a +8.6 grade in run defense through week nine (Spears injured his calf in the third quarter of the week nine game against the Packers and has since been placed on injured reserve). Through week nine, Ratliff had a +0.2 grade against the run. In the 5 games without Spears, Ratliff has a -6.7 grade against the run.
Other key players of note: Keith Brooking, who entered the game with a foot injury, had his worst grade of the season with a -2.9 as he struggled on run defense. Sean Lee (+0.8) on the other hand was good against the run and made three tackles with two stops in only 17 defensive snaps. Of note: Brooking played 39 defensive snaps, his lowest total of the whole season.
David Buehler had himself a quietly efficient game, recording his third straight grade of more than 2.0. For the season, this gives him a cumulative grade of +5.3 and ranks him 11th among all kickers. Mat McBriar, the one player who truly 'stacks one good game on top of the other' also had a good game with a +2.2. For the season, this gives him a +16.0 and ranks him as the third best punter in the league.
26 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well I guess that Spears needs to be resigned...
unless we can draft the Next Suh….or get a player like Ngata….
Knowledge and Skill overcome Superstition and Luck- Dawn Patrol Motto-Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology
by I draft the Cowboys!!!! on Dec 16, 2010 6:15 AM CST reply actions
+1
On all accounts. If Spears doesn’t require a lot of money (depending on what offers he gets from other teams) he should be resigned. We need help on the DLine.
And you said the magic word (at least in my mind) HALOTI NGATA!
Good to see the stats back-up my enthusiasm over Brent-Price’s play recently and the optimism I have for his 2011 season.
Thanks for the info OCC!
"Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable."
"Leadership is a matter of having people look at you and gain confidence, seeing how you react. If you're in control, they're in control." - Tom Landry
Frankly
And this relates to a reply to you on the Ngata idea in one of the DL posts, given that it’s the Ravens and despite the difficulties involved, I’d think it’s more likely they lock Ngata in and maybe let Yanda go FA. Even with the current CBA rules making it tough for them, I think they’d be more likely to work the deal with Ngata.
Yanda, there might be some possibilites there to alleviate our troubles on the other side of the ball. Fits into Mankins/Nicks FA-type strategy to work on the OL. Injuries and back concern me a bit, but when do they not for any player. Just another alternative we can’t afford to ignore.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
The kick-off coverage still has along way to go before they can be considered dependable without Buehler.
The guy is probably one of the team leaders in tackles on special teams because the unit is allowing the kick-returner to get that far upfield. Dallas will need to weigh the options on ST to make sure that if they replace him with a new kicker, they can provide that kicker coverage.
Ignore the Mainstream Media, EMBRACE THE HATE!!!!
Who says Beuhler is going anywhere?
by starmesh23 on Dec 16, 2010 12:12 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
ha ha ha
I know, I know. And honestly, that was half the fun of writing this post. I’m sure you’ll be pleased to hear that your boy DeSean graded out as the best offensive player for the Eagles with a 2.3. This marks the first time in his career that he has managed to put together two successive games with a grade higher than 2.0.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 16, 2010 7:33 AM CST up reply actions
Ah, a baited question!
So I will qualify my answer a little in order not to fall into that obvious trap.
DeSean’ overall grade of -4.8 is the result of three bad games: (Wk1 vs GB: -3.1, Wk4 vs. WAS: -3.0 and Wk12 vs CHI: -3.5). The official NFL game book receiving yards in those three games: 30, 19, 26. Targets vs receptions in those three games: 11-4, 7-3, 5-2. In those three games combined, DeSean saw 23 passes thrown his way and caught 9 for 75 yards. Atrocious.
Your boy is wildly erratic. A true game-changer one game (sadly, he chose Sunday for one of those), just a guy in another. Take out the three games above and he’d be ranked 21st among WRs with a 4.8 grade. Give him a decent +1.0 performance in each of those games and he’d be ranked the 7th best WR in the NFL.
As it is, DeSean’s -4.8 grade currently ranks him 85th out of 112 WRs.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 16, 2010 8:32 AM CST up reply actions
In those three games combined, DeSean saw 23 passes thrown his way and caught 9 for 75 yards. Atrocious.
Certainly atrocious if all 23 passes are on target, which we don’t really know. Anyway…
As it is, DeSean’s -4.8 grade currently ranks him 85th out of 112 WRs.
Haha, but that’s the bottom line. And that’s why I’ll never take PFF seriously. Without DeSean Jackson, does Philly beat Dallas last Sunday? I don’t know the answer to that, and I’m not sure I’d want to find out. But there’s no player in the league (Chris Johnson aside) that can score anytime he touches the football the way that Jackson can.
When they rank him 85th, they’re basically saying he’s not even a decent 3rd receiver (32 teams * 3 receivers = 96 WR’s). DeSean would be on the low end of the 3rd level of receivers (coming in at 85 in the 65-96 tier). It’s just laughable. Hell, 25th would be laughable. But 85th? I’d love to see some of the names they have ahead of him.
You're being way too literal imho
Of course DeSean is a major threat every time he touches the ball. I’m not denying that at all. He’s the No. 1 WR in the league in YPC, 7th in total yards and tied for 21st in TDs. Great, great stuff.
But these are all pure volume stats. They conveniently ignore periods of low production and hide a key fact of Jackson’s play: he is highly erratic. That’s not something you’ll see in the aggregated volume stats. The PFF stats reward consistency, and balance occasional flashes of brilliance with the occasional stinker.
As I said above, don’t take these numbers as gospel. They are merely another piece of evidence that together with volume stats, you own takeaways from watching the game and other sources of info help form a clearer picture of individual player performance.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 16, 2010 10:38 AM CST up reply actions
ha ha ha
If it’s any consolation, Miles Austin is ranked 100th with a -6.1, and they’ll get little argument from me. Is Miles Austin, in principle, one of the top WR in the league? Of course. Has he underwhelmed this season, despite ranking 17th in total yards among WR’s? Yep.
Over the last six games, Austin has caught 15 passes. Unacceptable for a No.1 wide receiver.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 16, 2010 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
I find it hard to reconcile the fact
That FO’s numbers and PFF’s numbers are polar opposites regarding both Jackson and Austin:
PFF:
Jackson: 85th/112
Austin: 100th/112
FO:
Jackson: DYAR: 19th, DVOA: 11th
Austin: DYAR: 13th, DVOA: 17th
It’s like the two places are talking about completely different players, when in actuality their both grading the same performances completely differently. And I’m more inclined to agree with FO than PFF (by and large, but especially in this instance). I’d like to see a league in which Austin and Jackson are among the worst WRs in the league. It sure isn’t this one though.
I also think people forget just how dominant Miles was when Tony was healthy. He’s struggled lately, certainly, but it would be foolish to condemn Austin’s season just because it happened to fall off the map when Kitna arrived.
Austin’s stats in games where Tony started and finished the game:
6.6 rec/game
97.2 yards/game
0.4 TD/game
Aside from the low TD rate, that’s exactly what you want from your superstar #1 WR. Those are Andre Johnson-esque numbers. And let’s not forget, Miles had a HUGE TD called back against the Vikings on a ticky-tack (imo) penalty. Had that play stood, his yards/game and TD/game would both be significantly better than they even are now.
I’m definitely concerned with Miles’ lack of sure-handedness in recent games, but I am not concerned with his lack of raw volume in the stats department. I think that’ll rebound with Tony’s return, and hopefully Miles will have fixed his hands by then, too.
I think PFF can be a good guide, but when their numbers turn up absolutely screwy results, then I have to question them. FO’s numbers are nice, because it’s just plug and chug work. There’s no room for interpretation. I’ve always heard this from coaches/players, and I believe it to be true: You can’t grade players on film very accurately if you don’t know the play that was called. If your MLB is in shallow zone coverage but leaves his zone to chase after a seam-streaking TE, it would look on TV like the CB who’s two steps behind the WR who caught a pass in the LB’s unoccupied zone is at fault, and that’s just not right. Or maybe it is right. Maybe they were actually in man coverage the CB just got completely beat while the MLB was covering the TE well down the seam. This problem is a much bigger issue when it comes to grading defenses in my opinion, but the same is still true for offenses to a lesser extent.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on any/all of this, OCC (or anyone else for that matter).
I have no problem reconciling the two
I love them both, but I think they both measure different things. FO upgrade the pure volume stats by accounting for opponent strength, game situation and other things. Great stuff. But like any volume stat, a player cannot decrease his total with a bad play.
PFF’s grading system, because it hands out negative grades as well as positive grades, can and does decrease your overall grade if you have a negative play.
Take a dropped pass. While many services track them, very few include them into any type of performance figure. According to PFF, Austin and Jackson are tied for the fourth most drops by a WR (9) in the league (Stats Inc, lists Austin with 8 and Jackson with 5 – but that’s a whole other debate). Also, taking Jackson’s targets/receptions from my comment above (23 passes thrown his way, caught 9 for 75 yards in three selected games) – how is that not a bad performance?
FO and many other stat sites that work off volume stats start their counting at 0. Everything a player does is added on top of that, sometimes in smaller, sometimes in larger increments. With PFF a bad performance is deducted from your overall rating. That is the key difference.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 17, 2010 12:34 AM CST up reply actions
But FO DOES detract "points" for bad plays
I read it every week in Quick Reads, when they’re talking about the week’s “Least Valuable WR.” It’s always something along the lines of “Player X caught only 1 of the 7 passes thrown his way, and two of them resulted in interceptions.” If FO only counted good plays, then that guy would get credit for the 1 rec he made and nothing else. But that’s not how it works; he gets the credit for the 1 rec, but he also gets penalized for the 4 incompletes and 2 INTs.
And it works both ways, mind you. I’m not just saying they’re a joke because they have DeSean as the 85th best WR. They also have Quintin Mikell as the best safety in the league. Quintin Mikell is my favorite player, but to say he’s the best safety in the league over guys like Troy Polamalu is beyond ridiculous.
Sadly, Colombo simply has to be replaced
You’ve gotta love his story, and that he overcame such a crazy injury, but his body is failing. Bigg ain’t far behind him.
Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.
perhaps you can recoup the $90.00
by requiring each of us to pay for the pleasure of your posts?
I’m eager to hear what the folks at PFF say about the other members of the Cowboys, esp. the rest of the OL and DL.
do they grade Defensive players?
I’m interested to see how Newman and Jenkins stack up against the league starting CB’s?
I, for one, thank you...
not only for the always insightful stats analysis, but for shelling out the cash to give you what you need for it. To the point a PayPal-like or other contribution to the cause entered my mind. It’d need a condition that it didn’t mean you’d have to retrieve any and all stat requests on demand though or you’d never have time for your fine analyses. Those alone are worth the $90/year. More.
And I’m with you on the content-available principle you mentioned. Thankfully, you’re less principled (kidding, OCC, just kidding). ;) You definitely get a pass on the principle issue.
Pride, Avarice, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Wrath, Sloth.
5 outta 7 ain't bad. Working on the other 2.
OCC
Does PFF grade each Cowboys player after a game? or only a few of them? I’m on the verge of paying for the package myself but would like to know exactly what I get for my $$ beforehand.
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
They grade every player on offense and defense, and some special teamers. You can sign up for a free demo here where you can apparently play around with the 2008 data to get a feeling for what you’ll be getting. The $90 gives you access to the grades for all 32 teams each week, incl. playoffs and back-data through 2008. Okay, now I’m sounding like their sales guy. Enough of that.
Send me an e-mail to the address at the bottom of the page and I’ll give you more details.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 16, 2010 11:07 AM CST up reply actions

by 
























