What Have The Cowboys Got In Stephen McGee?
It wasn't too long ago that BTB's own Paul Alexander wrote a story on Stephen McGee titled "See What Cowboys Stephen McGee Can Do? Actually, We Already Know". Paul wrote that while he had been a big fan of McGee for a long time, and still is, he wasn't sure whether McGee would be able to take that next step necessary to play at an NFL level:
"In two training camps, McGee's unofficial, underground nickname has been "Checkdown." McGee has been unable, even in skeleton drills, to anticipate receivers coming open. McGee insists that he sees defenses clearly, and that he fully mentally processes his reads and progressions."
"For the record, I believe him. But he has the football version of a golfer's "yips." He just won't turn it loose, electing instead to lay it off underneath to a TE or RB. Stephen still wants to see a receiver come open before he throws. That's just not the way it works in the NFL."
A lot of things have changed since Paul wrote the story on November 4th of this year, chief among them the fact that Jason Garrett took over as Head Coach of the Cowboys on November 8th. But also, lo and behold, the Cowboys awarded McGee with the ‘Scout Team Player Of The Week’ award last week. Is it therefore time to reevaluate exactly what the Cowboys have got in Stephen McGee?
After the break we hear what Coach Garrett himself as well as some teammates had to say about McGee.
Below you'll find a partial transcript of Garrett's Thursday morning press conference in which he talked briefly about McGee and reflects on the great job McGee has been doing in preparing the defense over the last three weeks. Watch the full conference here, courtesy of the mothership. The McGee part starts at the 3:50 mark:
Stephen McGee has had a little bit of a challenge the last three weeks. [The room erupts in laughter, Garrett grins, chuckles]
Drew Brees to Peyton Manning to Michael Vick. Stephen McGee actually got the ‘Scout Team Player Of The Week’ last week. The description was: ‘He resembled a young Peyton Manning’, and the question always is: How young? [More laughter, more grinning, another chuckle]
But this week is a real challenge, and Stephen is a very good athlete. Those of you who know his history; he ran a lot of option, he ran a lot in college so I think he’s very natural doing that. Having sid that, it’s probably the difference between – I’ll make a baseball reference – Wakefield and Nolan Ryan. [laughter, grin, chuckle]
That guy up there in Philadelphia is awfully athletic, he’s awfully quick and he’s awfully fast – Stephen’s trying his best. [This ends the McGee segment on a more sombre note]
McGee is the quarterback of the scout team, week in and week out, and it's his job to give his best imitation of opposing quarterbacks to help prepare the defense to 'be great on Sunday'. McGee reflected on the challenge of imitating a quarterback such as Peyton Manning, whose mannerisms alone are impossible to replicate:
"Obviously, you can't do it to a 'T,'" said McGee. "We're going to try to give the [defense] the very-best look and play fast."
And he does appear to have done a bang-up job of it, judging by the scout team award and by some second-hand player comments that Matt Mosely and Randy Galloway exchanged on the Galloway and Company show (Big tip o' the hat to Lissyyyyy for the fanpost on the topic):
Mosely: There is a QB for the Cowboys… Number 7... Stephen McGee. I had numerous different players come up to me and say you could not believe the progress this guy has made
Galloway: I also had players and coaches tell me he has looked good. And last time we had a look at him in preseason he did a good job.
Mosely: Playing the role of Manning did all the gyrations, and he did a good job imitating him getting the defense ready. And now he looks like Vick, he has speed, he can scramble and throw on the run. 7 different players tell me he is the Vick of the Cowboys organization.
Galloway: Should McGee play the last two games and see what happens? [rhetorical]
In an article for ESPNDallas.com, Matt Mosely separately quotes defensive end Jason Hatcher, who spent part of Wednesday's practice chasing McGee all over the field:
"This guy's actually pretty fast," said Hatcher of McGee, who once ran for his life at Texas A&M on a weekly basis. "He's been running around like a wild man, and he can flick his wrist and fire it in there like Vick."
Mosely also reports that Martellus Bennett thinks his old teammate from Texas A&M has gotten faster since joining the Cowboys, and that he did an outstanding imitation of Manning, all the way down to his pre-snap mannerisms.
So where does that leave us? Is Stephen McGee the real deal who simply needed some time to adjust to the tempo of the NFL or is he just another guy whose acting talent is good enough to fool the Cowboys defense?
94 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good writeup.
The answer is “only time will tell.”
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
When were mathmatically eliminated
See what the kid can do. I love Kitna as a backup, but it won’t be long before he hits a Brad Johnson-like decline.
Greetings from the Humungus, the Ruler of the Wasteland, the Ayatollah of Rock and Roll-A. I laugh at your puny plans.
by Lord Humungus on Dec 9, 2010 4:51 PM CST via mobile reply actions
true ...McGee might got the JUICE!!!
Thz is something to really look at tho… If McGEE can come in and play at a high level… Then i really do believe Romo then become trade bait
I love how quickly people want to jump on the Romo as trade-bati bandwagon
Troll Hunter
Current Kills: 2
do except every1 to retire a cowboy?
wake up man!!!!!
if u hav others that can play on a high level y keep them buried?
I just hate the bandwagon that thinks that Romo is untouchable…. until he wins us a super bowl or a NFC championships he is not in the category.
He gave thz team life and a chance … but that is it he’s had 5 years already.. U just gotta check other sources.. 3 playoff births in 5 years as him at qb… no Sb title’s or NFC champs…
go on ahead make your excuses to y he should stay here….
Jerry is being forced to face his errors now.
I think he knows that Romo is not the answer, given that Kitna seems to be flourishing as QB. First he axed Wade, in a few weeks he’ll begin chopping the other dead weight around here, including Romo IMO.
by 1 proud terp on Dec 10, 2010 2:17 PM CST up reply actions
i hope so....
Just get the picks for him..
to me thz is what happens when u might draft in the 10-12 of the draft…
Any other year dallas would have been drafting in the mid 20’s and an elite QB wud just be a dream…
Now we actually got a chance guys a real chance to draft an elite QB…& to be honest it still wouldnt hurt the team none bc u still got kitna… so whats the fuss about?
Really?
Isn’t this the same fanpost by lissy? Do we really need another place to argue this, I count 3, 4 including this one.
Ah, but you are talking about the quarterback position here.
What other position can generate the level of interest that does?
Not only is the starting quarterback the most important player position for a team’s success/failure, but the backups can be very, very important at critical times.
The Cowboys have found out they already have a very, very capable #2 on the team, but there is that little detail of him being 38 years old. Kitna may not have had the wear and tear of some quaterbacks, but he has taken a lot of snaps in his career, and even the Great and Powerful Favre had the curtain snatched back this year. At some point, Dallas at least needs to get Romo’s next backup in place. If you have a player on the roster who is already learning the system, who the coaches know, and he is capable of at least stepping up into the #2 slot, why not groom him. And if he has enough talent to at least challenge to become the eventual starter, then don’’t you want to try to find out if he can really step up?
And really, what are the risks of putting Romo back in for the whole game once the team is eliminated? There may be some value in having Romo play, but I would not leave him in the whole game. This may almost be like a preseason. I’m not saying give up on winning, but see if the team can win with McGee while protecting the starting quarterback.
Of course, I thought the team should not change HC in the middle of the season, either, so I am at times slightly off target.
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
If the team planned to give him any starts,
I think Romo would be on IR by now.
by starmesh23 on Dec 9, 2010 5:06 PM CST via mobile reply actions
size, cannon for an arm, speed, mobility, intelligence
If you could build your perfect QB it would be Stephen McGee.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
Now, slow down a tad
I do think McGee has a great set of tools, but that does not mean he has the intangibles to use them effectively to become a great or even good NFL QB.
But your original point (from your fanpost) is still good – it sounds like the players are liking McGee, and it would be great to get him some real time experience. It would be especially good to get that experience against a team that is still playing for something. I would like to see McGee get 6 to 8 quarters of experience as the season finishes.
However, JG has to prioritize what he is going to do with the last 4 games. He is obviously building for the future, with an eye towards being the HC himself. I don’t know if developing McGee is going to fit into that. I just hope it does.
If at first you don't succeed - blame someone else.
I'm sure McGee is a good QB,
but I’m for WINNING every game possible, and I don’t think he gives us the best chance to do that RIGHT NOW.
(Haven’t we already beat this dead horse over the last week? Jeez, here we go again.) Lisa, I mean, Lizzy, (I’ll get it right in a second), LIssyyyy – bring your “A game” cause I haven’t changed my mind about WINNING EVERY GAME yet. Neither has Ratliff or D. Ware.
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
Short term thinking vs. long term
you can slice it anyway you like it but that is short term thinking
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
Bull.. seriously
Stop the madness and stop putting fans down.
Starting Mcgee doesn’t prove or do anything different than benching him. If he does well it doesn’t mean he’ll be a successful QB and if he does bad it doesn’t mean he’s garbage.
JG is trying to establish a culture here. About accountability, accuracy, attention to detail. He is going to try and field the best team possible.
This is his first game against the Eagles as a HC. Why would he throw that away by start his third string second year QB.
Wow, that's a bizarre statement
Starting Mcgee doesn’t prove or do anything different than benching him.
I doesn’t prove anything? In what universe does benching a QB give the same amount of insight into his abilities as playing him?
Anyhow, we are not statistically eliminated yet, so I wouldn’t start McGee just yet.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
dude
its pointless trying to discuss this subject with Lissyyyyy.
by RisingSunCowboy on Dec 9, 2010 7:06 PM CST up reply actions
Well
I’ll say this, I’ve never seen a team that had just gone 3-1 down the stretch pull their starting QB when he’s doing adequately.
Is this a different situation, sure, most 38 year old QB’s don’t play this well.
I think it sends a bad message to the rest of your team if you don’t put the best players on the field.
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
You are also ignoring the fact we went 1-7 before that and we'll not make the playoffs
I think most players know what the message is: Kitna we’ll be around for another 1 or 2 years and McGee is the future. We would like to see what we have in him.
Furthermore, from what appears to be the players’ opinion of McGee it is not like we are throwing crap onto the field. There is a fair amount of respect for his abilities amongst his teammates. I would dare to say from the quotes above that their may be a fair amount excitement among the other players as to what this young QB is capable of if he were to start.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
I'm not ignoring anything.
I’m just stating that I’ve never seen that before.
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
Plus...
what do you expect the players to say “This guy plays like complete garbage.” Not saying that he is, just saying.
Carolina’s Steve Smith said that he felt like they had 2 franchise QB’s on the roster.
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
The media didn't ask them about McGee
The players were approaching the media of their own volition, then went out of their way to talk about McGee.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
Well said, Iron Fist,
it sends a bad message to the rest of your team if you don’t put the best players on the field
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
how do you know McGee isn't better than Kitna?
I mean we aren’t exactly talking about him replacing Brady or even Romo.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
We KNOW that Kitna can win games right now, he has proven it.
We DON’T KNOW that McGee can. One day we will find out. But since we play the Eagles on Sunday and since we want to win the game, then lets go with the known quality. Ambiguity and uncertainty can be dealt with in the off season and pre-season.
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
Besides, McGee hasn't gotten any first team reps.
Kitna, a veteran who was a starter needed a couple weeks with the first team to get rolling. You really think a scout team, 2nd year, non-starter will just jump right in and do well?
- "If you know so much about women why are you here at the Gas 'n' Sip on a Saturday night completely alone drinking beers with no women anywhere?"
- "By choice! Man"
by fan since '65 on Dec 10, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions
No I said that you can't take everything the players say at face value
at times the may lie… GASP! That doesn’t mean that they always lie but often times they do color the truth when talking to the media. I know, it’s a crazy concept. I hate to rattle your world that not all professional athletes are angels.
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
Im guessing here that if players said they DID want him to play over Kitna
you would assume they were telling the truth.
You have Dionne Warwwick on speed-dial right?
"You have to play this game like somebody just hit your mother with a 2x4." -- Dan Birdwell, Oakland Raiders
Well actually yeah I would
Why would anyone say something like that if they didn’t mean that?
Sean Lissemore = The next Bruce Smith
The key word here is "assume"
and there has been A WHOLE LOT OF THAT going on around here lately.
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
bigham, the players are only lying when they disagree with "you know who"
However, if they ever start praising McGee, then all-of-a-sudden they start speaking truth. The ability to interpret this weird double-talk among the players is actually called “critical thinking” by some fans. (spoken with chagrin)
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
This team has already won its way out of a great draft pick...is it worth it?
Around here it’s all or nothing. Mediocrity SUCKS!!!
This team is out of it so let’s give our best efforts and hope the other team has more points.
I know, it’s sacrilege to hope for a loss, but dang it, these games no longer matter!!!
Trust me, I hate the Eagles with a passion, but in order to win the War, this team will need more high impact players and the best way to do that is by getting some high drat picks. So this team needs to lose out.
Losing out, by playing players that are playing for future jobs. Let’s see what the 2nd and 3rd string guys have…this is pre-season, it’s about finding out who can play and who is simply taking up a roster spot. QB is no exception.
Dallas will be 6-10
They will split the last 4 and lose both to Philly.I hate Philly but unless Vick lies down,I just do not see how the Dallas D stops him.I think they will play them tough but Philly is just better this year in my opinion.6-10 is still going to be a nice position for a decent draft pick
by Oshawa Cowboy on Dec 10, 2010 6:35 AM CST up reply actions
If he’s not in the game it’s because he hasn’t earned it.
Garrett understands the importance of hard work and remember he was a back up quarterback in this league. He had to scrap for every snap he’s gotten and that made him the man he is now. Mc Gee will get a shot eventually, and when he does he’ll be ready for it.
And I know this sounds like a flimsy excuse but I think their disgustingly huge contracts have a lot to say in those situations.
You think Jerry is going to pay Roy and Barber some of the highest amounts of money in the league for their positions to sit on the bench?
The mishandling of personnel is definitely disgusting and something that warrants our criticism in this offense. You think Holland wouldn’t be less of a liability than Gurode?
Well, Gurode grades out as the #5 Center in the NFL (combined run/pass blocking)
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
footballoutsiders.com
some of the content must be purchased; some is free
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
I’ve been kicking around an idea about finding out the average position that teams starting offensive lines are drafted and then putting that into perspective with how well they actually play. And then of course trying to divine what that means about our drafting methods in regards to the line. Scarily enough though there aren’t too many outcomes that are going to be positive for us.
So little time …
That would be an interesting read
Sounds detailed and time-consuming ;)
vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
Great minds thinking alike?
I have been planning to do almost the exact same thing, except I was going to look at all OL drafted in the 1st and 2nd round and see how they graded out in their first year from 2008-2010. The hypothesis being that even a 1st rounder is not a guaranteed improvement for the line. But I may be wrong. Might get it done over the weekend.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 10, 2010 2:20 AM CST up reply actions
2 nerds with their calculators maybe P ;
Numbers are fun though eh OCC.
We should go for it, you can do the 1st and 2nd rounds overall and I’ll take the more cohesive look after. It’s starting to slow down a bit at work so hopefully that will allow me to get onto my Evo and do some serious research. I’m going to start working on a fun little article for our Sunday night match up against the Eagles tomorrow and then get into the number crunching after that.
I don’t know about the hypothesis though, you have your Alex Barrons (a first round pick on the Cowboys that can’t even get the start over Marc “trickhip” Colombo) and then you have a ton of anchors on the left side of the line. And then you have Doug Free, who despite a few miscues is one hell of a left tackle for us. Not quite Flozell in the run blocking department; but definitely not Flo in the penalties and pass blocking either.
My hypothesis is that the Cowboys are drafting in line with a lot of other teams in the league but are having terrible luck with injuries. We took a guy the round above Doug Free who got hurt and never played in this league. If he stays healthy and we have 2 linemen of the future already in place the Cowboys don’t look as inept as they do right now.
Ha!
here I am, writing half of my post already in the comments section. My hypothesis, which I#d like to prove or disprove with some data is this:
A lot of people want an O-lineman with the first pick. The chances that he’ll be a successful starter in year one are perhaps 50/50, perhaps even lower. So hoping that we’ll fix all the issues in the O-Line with one or two draft picks is unrealistic, and we’ll likely have to go the free agent route next year at one O-line position at least.
Then again, the numbers may not prove this and I won’t have a post to write…
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 10, 2010 7:41 AM CST up reply actions
Marc Colombo, 1st round pick – 2002
Andre Gurode, 2nd round pick – 2002
Leonard Davis, 1st round pick – 2001 (second overall)
Kyle Kosiers, 7th round pick – 2002
Doug Free, 4th round pick – 2007
Cowboys average offensive linemen average a 3.0 pick taken.
New England Patriots offensive line averages 3.8 – and when you take into account the only first round pick on that line, Logan Mankins sat out for a 4th rounder for most of the year – 4.4.
I would say we are 100% on those five.
Not right now, this year, of course (they’re old). But over the course of their careers, we are batting 1.000
- "If you know so much about women why are you here at the Gas 'n' Sip on a Saturday night completely alone drinking beers with no women anywhere?"
- "By choice! Man"
by fan since '65 on Dec 10, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions
you have to take into account who's doing the drafting
were we have dip into FA to fix something the Patriots can get it done through the draft.
the definition of insanity should have a picture of Jerry Jones next to it. he has no idea what he is doing or that its wrong...
build him up, trade him
I’m a fan of the thought that we should show case him when we can to maybe gain a premium pick by trading him (although i don’t know what would be realistic).
Go Cowboys
I like the logic
Nobody is saying pull Kitna and start McGee against the Birds. After the next loss however, it may be time to give the kid 2 or 3 games to see what he can do. Worst case, we establish his true trade value and recognize we need to start grooming another. Nothing at all against Kitna. We know what we have in Kitna (exceptional backup); we don’t know what we have in McGee (scout team warrior, as of now). Let’s not repeat the mistakes of the past.
Why again this absurb fixation with trading every player on the squad?
McGee is learnning and growing.
He looked PDG (pretty damn good) in the last pre season game which was his start to finish.
Showed the ability to throw on target 40 yards downfield.
Running the scout team keeps him invilved in game planning and keeps him sharp.
C’Mon Man! Why trade him when he is following the Aaron Rogers path?
Heard of him?
Backed up Favre for years and learned while getting stronger and NFL smarter.
Maybe the Packers should have taken some goofy 2nd Round pick for him when it was offered — they would be sooooo much better off now eh?
Come on that doesn't work
Aaron Rodgers was 24 when he started for the Packers. McGee is currently 25. Romo was 26. How much longer does this kid want to wait to get his shot
Troll Hunter
Current Kills: 2
My comment may not have been clear
I forgot to spell out that the BEST case is that we see McGee is the real deal IN GAME SITUATIONS and we know we have our QB of the future or at least an acceptable backup when Kitna hangs it up. I see no downside to getting McGee meaningful reps against teams that still have a chance. We can see all we want in preseason, but I for one have been fooled by players looking good in preseason.
Shoot, fellas, let's just start all the backups and see what they can do.
Let’s start Young in place of Columbo. He’s old, too. Might as well see what he’s got. Because these games don’t mean anything to anybody, and our second year QB can probably read defenses as well as that old man playing now.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
Actually,
I think Young, or almost anybody else, would be an improvement over Colombo at this point.
by One.Cool.Customer on Dec 10, 2010 7:43 AM CST up reply actions
yeah, that might not have been the best example
Big Mark has had more than a few wiffs lately.
"We'll see." --Bill Parcells
I hope McGee gets the opportunity to show what he can do.
We know Kitna is a more than capable QB, but 38 is 38. If McGee keeps the beat rolling, I think the writing is on the wall for Romo.
if by writing you mean
in 5 years.
AFB Condensed- New name, same flavor.
Quoting yourself doesn't require your own name attached to it. I'm going to assume if there isn't anyone else's name attached it's yours.
He's already had 5 years
disappointing…
by 1 proud terp on Dec 10, 2010 2:19 PM CST up reply actions
You're back again?
Seriously. There is no writing on the wall. What will you do when Romo is named the starting QB for 2011? Will you cry? Will you give up in denial? Or will you realize that you were just flat out wrong
Troll Hunter
Current Kills: 2
I really missed you NYHorn...but I'll keep shooting.
You assume you know the future. Flip your words…what if Romo is traded and we move on with either McGee or another QB next year and have a successful year? Or better yet, if Romo continues to QB this team for the next 3 years and we never make it out of the 1st rd. of the playoffs….will you(and a handful of other knee-jerk romosexuals(thanks 5blings) apologize and admit you were wrong? Will you cry on each others shoulders? Doubt it, you’ll probably just change the subject. If Romo remains next year and we win the Superbowl, I WILL admit I was wrong. I am a man, how about you? However, as of now, my patience with the Romo Project is zero.
by 1 proud terp on Dec 11, 2010 9:55 AM CST up reply actions
So you want to take a bet?
That Romo will be traded or kicked off the team? In place of either McGee or Kitna?
and I’m the crazy one? How’s this
IF Romo is kicked off the team next year, and IF we win the Superbowl with either Kitna or McGee, and IF you are still commenting on this site I will personally apologize to you. I’m enough of a fan to want the Cowboys to win the Superbowl with anybody, except Vick.
Troll Hunter
Current Kills: 2
However the bet stands that you must do the same for me if Romo wins a Superbowl
Troll Hunter
Current Kills: 2
That's a bet!
IF we win a Superbowl with Romo, I WILL admit I was wrong and be far more critical of myself than any of you here could be. I hope I am still allowed on this site in a few years, and that I haven’t been banned for straying outside of the Romo-is-the-only-answer groupthink. I am a cowboys fan, but not a fan of all cowboys fans here. I want another Superbowl far more than Terry wants a night with Romo. If Romo proves me wrong, I will avail myself to the cruel barbs deservedly to come my way. Fair enough?
by 1 proud terp on Dec 12, 2010 6:03 PM CST up reply actions
Don't you just love when fans want to replace a damn good QB
with a #3 QB that has never played in the NFL. All because some dickhead sports writer says he runs the scout team good. Get a clue people, Romo is a top QB in this league. We all know Jerry does some dumb things, but not even Jerry is stupid enough to trade away a top QB to let a 3rd string body QB the Boys. QBs are like a good woman, if you got one you better keep her, because the next good one may not come along for awhile.
Lock n Load
by DIRE WOLF on Dec 10, 2010 12:15 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Interesting comparison you make between Romo and a good woman.
Are you trying to say something?
by 1 proud terp on Dec 10, 2010 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
Don't question my loyalties, son.
I’m Cowboys to the core. Romo-rons beware, the time with your golden boy is coming to an end.
by 1 proud terp on Dec 10, 2010 2:33 PM CST up reply actions
With fans like you the Cowboys don't need enemies.
The Ravens are pretty good, think about it.
Lock n Load
Ravens fans are pretty obnoxious.
Perhaps YOU should don some purple.
by 1 proud terp on Dec 11, 2010 9:57 AM CST up reply actions
i wouldn't call them idiots & its just an opinion.
its no secret the watch is ticking on Romo’s career to prove he can win big games consistently & he gets another chance in 2011 but you have wonder who’s going to be the next scapegoat in Dallas if another regime fails.
we all know Romo can play the game when things are going great but its when he’s faced with adversity that he hasn’t shown up. the win against the Eagles in the wildcard game was great last season but lets be honest, the ShEagles were banged up badly & we got embarrassed against the Vikings the following week. thats the time when “elite” QBs put the team on there shoulders & atleast keep it competitive. we’ve all seen Brees, Rivers, Manning, Brady, Big Ben, Favre, etc have this “it” factor & no matter the stats they get a win
the definition of insanity should have a picture of Jerry Jones next to it. he has no idea what he is doing or that its wrong...
Couldn't have said it better.
I don’t have a #9 jersey hanging in my closet because I’ve always thought Romo sucked. I came to that epiphany earlier this year. It just seems like many here are so blindly defensive of Romo, that they are content to remain in mediocrity. I want to win another Superbowl, that’s all.
by 1 proud terp on Dec 11, 2010 10:04 AM CST up reply actions
You're not a real Cowboy fan,
just another bandwagon fan.
DFW has a statue of a two time winning Super Bowl Head Coach and the greatest innovator in the history of Pro Football. Philly has a statue of a fictional boxer from a B movie. Go figure.
When I want you to determine who I'm a fan of
I’ll give you a call. Don’t bother paying your phone bill, boy
by 1 proud terp on Dec 12, 2010 6:06 PM CST up reply actions
they could atleast work him in Like Reid did Vick last season
it wouldn’t hurt to find out what he’s learned after 2 years in the system. after seeing what Choice, Lee, McCann & even Butler have proved on the field when given the opportunity, nothing would surprise me. the sooner we get the underachievers from the top to the bottom of the roster out of this organization the better off this team will be.
the definition of insanity should have a picture of Jerry Jones next to it. he has no idea what he is doing or that its wrong...

by 























