Lack of Points: a Concern!
I posted this fanpost entitled "Lack of Points: a Concern?" on August 31st, 2009:
"I've absolutely loved the way the Cowboys have been moving the ball downfield while taking large chunks of time off the clock during the preseason. I think during the Niners game we moved down something like 94 yards in 8 1/2 minutes. Outstanding. That's the way to do things. Spread the ball around and be unpredictable. Everything that didn't happen last season. However, it's only logical that the more time devoted to a single drive, the less points there may be to score Frankly, I think it's sometimes been a bit discouraging as to how few returns the team has gotten as a result.
The Cowboys managed to move the ball and drain the clock numerous times during the Tennessee game and yet at one point the Titans were up 10-7, despite putting out a significantly less amount of yards and possession time. The Titans were just more efficient.
It's not a concern yet, as we have yet to see the starters play a full game. But while I like the Cowboys controlling the clock and moving the ball down the field, they may not be doing it as efficiently as possible. It might not be a good idea for the team to run every drive like that.
Something to think about."
The way the NFL ranks offensive and defensive performances is misleading. Of course, the most important aspect of winning football games comes down to scoring and denying points. This is oddly not how offense and defense is ranked. The NFL ranks offense and defense by yardage. The Saints led the NFL in offense this season averaging 403.8 yards per game. Our Cowboys were second with 399.4.
One large difference: the Saints averaged 31.9 points per game. The Cowboys? 22.6, less than both the Giants and Eagles. With all the talk about how bad the Jets' offense (passing game anyway) was this season, that team on average scored 21.8 points on only 321 yards per game.
If you were to rank the NFL by points scored, the Cowboys were 14th in 2009, between the non-playoff Falcons and the below .500 Dolphins. Not so good for the league's second-best offense.
The Cowboys had a wonderful defense (9th in yardage allowed, 2nd in scoring allowed), but on days when they can't hang with tough offensive teams like Minnesota (second in scoring offense with 29.4 ppg, 379.6 ypg), the scoring offense needs to be significantly higher.
I think it was Bill Parcells who said that for every 100 yards a team should have a touchdown. With 400 yards per game, the Cowboys fell about a single touchdown short all season.
The offensive focus for next season must be to score more points. Here's a few things that can be done:
-better kicking; Nick Folk is to blame for many of those missing points
-better catching: here's looking at you, Roy
-better OL/power running/play calling: you would think Jason Garrett would stop running Barber up the middle inches from the goal line after two consecutive failures.
Another user-created commentary provided by a BTB reader.
2 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
first
first
"what do voluntary mean?" - Darren Hambrick
Second!
I agree with you totally Grady. The only thing is, I think you have to invert those last three things in regards to matter of importance. The running offense is the biggest weakness. can Garrett fix the “broken” run Offense the Cowboys have? I’m skeptical…..
He’s had time already, and it doesn’t seem to be that important to him. I wouldn’t be surprised if offensive line isn’t considered in the draft until later rounds (once again). I want to see a bold move for a big time gaurd and tackle in the draft and free agency. I also believe they will continue using Barber in Garrett’s run offense “scheme” and philosiphy. Don’t worry though, soon people will come to realize this big flaw about Garrett, because it’s inescapable. Everything is rosy right now because the Cowboys had a good season (not great), but it almost went sour, didn’t it? Thank god for the defense. It is the offense that is the culprit, make no mistake. There is no excuse anymore. just imagine what the Cowboys COULD have done with only a “good” running game. I’m not talking about stats, I’m talking about 3rd and 3, and having confidence to run it right down a teams throat.
Pardon the pun, but Garrett needs help running the Cowboys run offense. Dan Reeves would have been perfect last year, but that didn’t work out (for some reason). The evaluation of running backs and offensive lineman IS the question, not only the use of the running backs/running game. There is alot more to a running game then handing off the ball in the lead/draw.
"Amongst the enemy's Lair, there will always be a DallasPalace!"

by 



















